spokane math symposium november 2010

16
Addressing “The Math Problem:” Working Together on “Group-Worthy” Work Dr. Bill Moore Washington State Board for Community & Technical Colleges 360-704-4346, [email protected] Re-Thinking Pre-college Math Project Spokane Area Math Symposium November 2010

Upload: bill-moore

Post on 19-Jan-2015

378 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Overview/update of K-16 math issues in Washington state

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010

Addressing “The Math Problem:”

Working Together on “Group-Worthy” Work

Dr. Bill MooreWashington State Board for Community & Technical Colleges

360-704-4346, [email protected] Re-Thinking Pre-college Math Project

Spokane Area Math SymposiumNovember 2010

Page 2: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010

Outline of Comments

1. What the work is really about

2. Why it’s “group-worthy”

3. How we’re approaching the work

4. Value/role of collaborative networks

Page 3: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010

It’s About Equity, Not Just Math

Page 4: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010

Why the Work is Group-Worthy

TIME

RESOURCES BIASES & ATTITUDESCONTROL

INERTIA

STRUCTURES & LOGISTICS

INCENTIVES

EGO

AUTONOMY

COMPLEXITY OF SYSTEMS

Page 5: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010

Administrative Support:Addressing Barriers to Transforming Practice

Page 7: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010

Source: Uri Treisman & Jenna Cullinane, UT-Austin, from Achieving the Dream data

32% 27% 41%

33% 26%41%

Page 9: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010

Faculty Inquiry Groups

Knowledge Exchange Networks

Re-Thinking Pre-College Math

Page 10: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010

Changing the Core

We put an enormous amount of energy into changing structures and usually leave

instructional practice untouched…We are attracted and drawn to these [efforts] because they’re visible and, believe it or not, easier to do than to make the hard changes, which are

in instructional practice…

Richard Elmore, “The Limits of ‘Change’,” January/February 2002

Page 11: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010

Fundamental Shift: “Open Source

Teaching”Our understanding of learning will accelerate faster in

a teaching community that acts like a learning system—one that makes knowledge of what it takes to learn explicit, adapts it, tests it, refines practice, reflects, rearticulates, and shares that new knowledge. Teaching must become problematized, innovative and professional, taking research as its model.

Diane Laurillard, “Open Teaching: The Key to Sustainable and Effective Open Education”

Page 12: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010
Page 13: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010

And Another Problem…“The student described a terrific course offered by the college of agriculture, consisting of realistic problems tackled by student teams exploring and using the resources of a research university.‘I have never learned so much in a class. I didn’t even know I could learn like that.’‘That professor must be a wonderful teacher,’ I responded.The student laughed. ‘We did all the work; he just assigned the problems and helped out. He doesn’t know how to teach.’”

Larry Spence, “The Case Against Teaching,” Change, November/December 2001

Page 15: Spokane Math Symposium November 2010

“Ladder of Engagement”Issue-oriented repository of

exemplary practices & resources