spine cancer - sbrt treatment of previously irradiated progressive spine mets - md anderson

1
Prospective evaluation of spinal reirradiation by using stereotactic body radiation therapy: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Garg AK, Wang XS, Shiu AS, Allen P, Yang J, McAleer MF, Azeem S, Rhines LD, Chang EL. Source Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Abstract BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for previously irradiated, progressive spinal metastases may be a viable option in selected patients. The authors review a prospective series of spinal metastasis patients reirradiated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 59 patients with 63 tumors of the spine were reirradiated with stereotactic body radiotherapy between 2003 and 2009. Spinal magnetic resonance imaging was performed both before treatment initiation and at regular follow-up intervals. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was delivered to a peripheral dose of 30 grays (Gy) in 5 fractions (6 Gy per fraction), or 27 Gy in 3 fractions (9 Gy per fraction). The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0 and McCormick neurological function system were used to evaluate toxicity and neurologic status, respectively. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 17.6 months. Actuarial 1-year radiographic local control and overall survival for all patients were both 76%. Of the tumors that progressed after stereotactic body radiotherapy, 13 (81%) of 16 patients had tumors that were within 5 mm of the spinal cord, and 6 of them eventually developed spinal cord compression. Toxicity was most commonly grade 1 or 2 fatigue. Two patients experienced mild to moderate radiation injury (lumbar plexopathy) while remaining independently ambulatory and pain free. Freedom from neurologic deterioration from any cause was 92% at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Reirradiation for progressive spinal metastases with stereotactic body radiotherapy results in good local control and limited toxicity. Initial surgery should be considered for tumors within 5 mm of the spinal cord. Radiation dose should be tailored for tumors near or invading the psoas muscle secondary to observed risk of lumbar plexopathy. Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Upload: spokane-cyberknife-radiation-oncology-center

Post on 30-Nov-2015

752 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Reirradiation for progressive spinal metastases with stereotactic body radiotherapy results in good local control and limited toxicity.Cyberknife is the first and only dedicated 'Frameless' SRS/SBRT system available for removing cancerous and non-cancerous tumors throughout the body. Cyberknife is the most advanced technology for delivering SRS/SBRT treatments. It not only utilizes sophisticated image guidance but it is also the only system that has extremely advanced Tumor Tracking. Always on Target, Cyberknife treats tumors fixed or in motion with sub-millimeter accuracy, reducing, even limiting side effects and complications. And treatments are completed in 5 days or less.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Spine Cancer - SBRT Treatment of Previously Irradiated Progressive Spine Mets - MD Anderson

Prospective evaluation of spinal reirradiation by using stereotactic body radiation therapy: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Garg AK, Wang XS, Shiu AS, Allen P, Yang J, McAleer MF, Azeem S, Rhines LD, Chang EL.

Source

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for previously irradiated, progressive spinal metastases may be a viable

option in selected patients. The authors review a prospective series of spinal metastasis patients

reirradiated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

METHODS:

A total of 59 patients with 63 tumors of the spine were reirradiated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

between 2003 and 2009. Spinal magnetic resonance imaging was performed both before treatment

initiation and at regular follow-up intervals. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was delivered to a peripheral

dose of 30 grays (Gy) in 5 fractions (6 Gy per fraction), or 27 Gy in 3 fractions (9 Gy per fraction). The

National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0 and McCormick neurological function system were

used to evaluate toxicity and neurologic status, respectively.

RESULTS:

Mean follow-up was 17.6 months. Actuarial 1-year radiographic local control and overall survival for all

patients were both 76%. Of the tumors that progressed after stereotactic body radiotherapy, 13 (81%) of

16 patients had tumors that were within 5 mm of the spinal cord, and 6 of them eventually developed

spinal cord compression. Toxicity was most commonly grade 1 or 2 fatigue. Two patients experienced

mild to moderate radiation injury (lumbar plexopathy) while remaining independently ambulatory and pain

free. Freedom from neurologic deterioration from any cause was 92% at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS:

Reirradiation for progressive spinal metastases with stereotactic body radiotherapy results in good local

control and limited toxicity. Initial surgery should be considered for tumors within 5 mm of the spinal cord.

Radiation dose should be tailored for tumors near or invading the psoas muscle secondary to observed

risk of lumbar plexopathy.

Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.