spinal cord injury without radiographic -

3
RESEARCH REVIEW Spinal Cord Injury without Radiographic Ahdnormalities SCIWORA Synopsis by: William J. Owens, DC, DAAMLP Mark E, Studin, DC, FASBE(C), DAAPM, DAAMLP USE: To demonstrate the importance of thorough diagnostic exarrif- nation of trauma patients. TITLE: The Adult Spinal Cord Injury Without Radiographic Abnor- malities Syndrome: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ciinical Findings in Adults with Spinal Cord Injuries Having Normal Radiographs and Computed Tomography Studies CITATION: J Trauma. 2008; 65:86-93. AUTHORS: Georglos B. Kasimatis, MD; Ellas Panagíotopoulos, MD, PhD; Panagiotis Megas, MD, PhD; Charalambos Matzaroglou, MD; John Gliatis, MD, PhD; Minos Tyliianakis, MD, PhD; and Elias Lambiris, MD, PhD. Brain Stem Contusion Injury MedJVisualslnc. MediVisual3.com When evaluating the traumatically injured patient, correlation of all aspects of the diagnostic process is paramount to proper care. The diagnostic process starts with eliciting a complete and thorough history of the trauma and the resulting symptoms. "Eliciting" a history is different than "taking" a history. Elicit- ing a history involves the clinician asking pointed questions about each and every part of the patient's body, to ensure subtle complaints are not overlooked. In many cases, these subjec- tive complaints help to direct objective testing. Correlating the patient's history with physical examination, tab results and imaging studies helps to complete the diagnostic picture and provide the doctor with an accurate causal relationship, prognosis and treatment plan. What if the history, objective and radiological testing do not correlate? Did the patient have an accident? Go to the HR for evaluation only to be released with radiographs and CT being normal? Is it your policy to evaluate the patient or do you rely on the testing of others to diagnose your patients? This very recent paper, published in The Journal of Trauma in 2008, by Kasimatis. et al., discusses in depth the presentation of patients with cervical spine injury that had a "radiologic-clinical mismatch." The authors state, "This retrospective review provides information on adult patients with cervical spinal cord injuries whose radiographs and computed tomography studies were nomial." {Kasimatis, et al., 2008. p. 86) By definition, SCIWORA consisted of negative radiologie investigation with plain radiographs and CT scans, but not MRI. It is important to note that the authors reported, "No patient with an up- per cervical spine injur>' did have any radiological and clinical mismatch." {Kasimatis. et al.. 2008, p. 90) It was shown that, in the cases presented in this paper, the highest level of involvement was the C4-5 level, ln all patients reviewed that had SCIWORA. it was the non-boney components of the spinal cord, intenertebral disc or ligamentum flavum, that caused injury to the spinal cord, or it was an epidural hematoma. The epidural he- matoma was particularly observed in the patients with a fused spinal column, such as ankylosing spondylitis or cervical spondylosis. The authors go on to say. "SCIWORA was first described by Pange, et al. ( 1982). and is a well known entity in pédiatrie populations, but its incidence in adults varies significantly among studies." {Kasimatis, et al.. 2008. p. 90). When imaging studies are reviewed, they arc often read as having, or not having, radiological evidence of trauma. This is an important point of discussion since all struc- tures in the spine must be evaluated. The physical examination plays a very important role, as does MRI. Since SCIWORA is an entity that evolved because of the lack of soft tissue imaging in the trauma patient, MRI becomes a very important diagnostic tool prior to the chiropractic adjustment. The mechanism of injtiry in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is also important to understand, since two phases have been identi- fied. In the first phase, it is the primary injury or mechanical insult that results in the damage to spinal cord tissue. This is particularly important in patients with bone spurs, as the cord can be stretched across these structures. Secondly, there is a physiological and histochemical response to the initial trauma The following review is providedfor educational purposes only. It is not designed or intended to reproduce or replace ihe authors ' work. Readers are encouraged to obtain full licen.sed version.s of the anide as determined by Copyright Law. For information on how to obtain a py, please contact the Academy directly. www.amchiropractor.com OCTOBER 2008 I The American Chiropractor I 59

Upload: others

Post on 11-Feb-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

RESEARCH REVIEW

Spinal Cord Injury without RadiographicAhdnormalities SCIWORASynopsis by: William J. Owens, DC, DAAMLP

Mark E, Studin, DC, FASBE(C), DAAPM, DAAMLP

USE: To demonstrate the importance of thorough diagnostic exarrif-

nation of trauma patients.

TITLE: The Adult Spinal Cord Injury Without Radiographic Abnor-

malities Syndrome: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ciinical

Findings in Adults with Spinal Cord Injuries Having Normal

Radiographs and Computed Tomography Studies

CITATION: J Trauma. 2008; 65:86-93.

AUTHORS: Georglos B. Kasimatis, MD; Ellas Panagíotopoulos, MD, PhD;

Panagiotis Megas, MD, PhD; Charalambos Matzaroglou, MD;

John Gliatis, MD, PhD; Minos Tyliianakis, MD, PhD; and Elias

Lambiris, MD, PhD.

Brain StemContusionInjury

MedJVisualslnc.

MediVisual3.com

When evaluating the traumatically injured patient, correlationof all aspects of the diagnostic process is paramount to propercare. The diagnostic process starts with eliciting a completeand thorough history of the trauma and the resulting symptoms."Eliciting" a history is different than "taking" a history. Elicit-ing a history involves the clinician asking pointed questionsabout each and every part of the patient's body, to ensure subtlecomplaints are not overlooked. In many cases, these subjec-tive complaints help to direct objective testing. Correlatingthe patient's history with physical examination, tab resultsand imaging studies helps to complete the diagnostic pictureand provide the doctor with an accurate causal relationship,prognosis and treatment plan.

What if the history, objective and radiological testing do notcorrelate? Did the patient have an accident? Go to the HR for

evaluation only to be released with radiographs and CTbeing normal? Is it your policy to evaluate the patientor do you rely on the testing of others to diagnose yourpatients?

This very recent paper, published in The Journalof Trauma in 2008, by Kasimatis. et al., discusses indepth the presentation of patients with cervical spineinjury that had a "radiologic-clinical mismatch." Theauthors state, "This retrospective review providesinformation on adult patients with cervical spinal cordinjuries whose radiographs and computed tomographystudies were nomial." {Kasimatis, et al., 2008. p. 86)

By definition, SCIWORA consisted of negativeradiologie investigation with plain radiographsand CT scans, but not MRI. It is important to notethat the authors reported, "No patient with an up-per cervical spine injur>' did have any radiologicaland clinical mismatch." {Kasimatis. et al.. 2008,p. 90) It was shown that, in the cases presentedin this paper, the highest level of involvement wasthe C4-5 level, ln all patients reviewed that hadSCIWORA. it was the non-boney components ofthe spinal cord, intenertebral disc or ligamentumflavum, that caused injury to the spinal cord, orit was an epidural hematoma. The epidural he-matoma was particularly observed in the patientswith a fused spinal column, such as ankylosingspondylitis or cervical spondylosis. The authorsgo on to say. "SCIWORA was first described byPange, et al. ( 1982). and is a well known entity inpédiatrie populations, but its incidence in adultsvaries significantly among studies." {Kasimatis,

et al.. 2008. p. 90). When imaging studies are reviewed, theyarc often read as having, or not having, radiological evidence oftrauma. This is an important point of discussion since all struc-tures in the spine must be evaluated. The physical examinationplays a very important role, as does MRI. Since SCIWORA isan entity that evolved because of the lack of soft tissue imagingin the trauma patient, MRI becomes a very important diagnostictool prior to the chiropractic adjustment.

The mechanism of injtiry in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is alsoimportant to understand, since two phases have been identi-fied. In the first phase, it is the primary injury or mechanicalinsult that results in the damage to spinal cord tissue. This isparticularly important in patients with bone spurs, as the cordcan be stretched across these structures. Secondly, there is aphysiological and histochemical response to the initial trauma

The following review is provided for educational purposes only. It is not designed or intended to reproduce or replace ihe authors ' work.Readers are encouraged to obtain full licen.sed version.s of the anide as determined by Copyright Law. For information on how to obtain a

py, please contact the Academy directly.

www.amchiropractor.com OCTOBER 2008 I The American Chiropractor I 59

that causes further damage to the spinalcord, "...among which free radical forma-tion, vascular disttirbances and apoptosisare the principal ones." (Kasimatis, et a!..2008. p. 91).

This study reports some interestingfinal points:1. "A rate of around 5% may be con-

sidered as representative of the tmeincidence of cervical SWIWORA."(Kasimatis, et al., 2008. p. 90).

2. "Children beiow 8 years and the el-derly above 60 are mostly affected,but the two populations have differentcharacteristics." (Kasimatis. et al.,2008, p. 90). In children, the dispro-portionate size of the head related tothe neck causes excessive injury, whilein the elderly it has more to do v ithpre-existing degenerative changes andloss of disc height. Since the pre-exist-ing changes in the spine are the issue,consideration of this phenomenonin any patient that has pre-existingchanges in the spine, regardless of age,is appropriate.

3. "... .the physician dealing with a pos-sible SCIWORA patient should be

aware that the correlation of physicalexamination with the radiologicalstudies is mandatory, and he shouldperform MRI in all cases."" (Kasimatis,etal.,2008, p. 92)

When evaluating patients that are trau-matically injured, correlation of all clini-cal findings is mandatory, especially priorlo chiropractic adjustment. In the caseof spinal cord compromise, direct andspeedy neurosurgical referral is critical.

Each issue, a clinical topic will be providedby Drs. Mark Studin & William J. Owens ofthe American Academy of Medical Legal Pro-fe.Ksionats (AA MLP), which is a national non-profit oi'ganizafion comprised of doctors andlawyers. The purpose oj the organization is toprovide its members with current research intrauma and spinal-related topics to keep theprofe.ssional on file cutting edge of healfhcarc.Members may also sit for a Diplomate ex-amination and be conferred a DA A MLP. Theorganization also offers .support to the indi-vidual member s practice. To team more, go towww.aamlp.org or call f-7!6-22H-3847.\

Crossword Puzzle Answers

Al

T

U

N

1

T

U

P

B

{^

p

jgust Is

J

sue

M A R K

U

EG

U

L

A

T

^

N

S

A

0 F 1 C

L fA)N

1 1 D

C

r

E

R C

S

,P

1

N

A

L

Ü

t

,C,

0

M

P

R

E

S

S

1

0N

T M

E N

G 1

L 1

R E

C \R)

T

E

R

A

P

E

U

T

1

C

E

X

L

R

, -1

E

T

R

A

N

E

D

E

|T

S

R

A

Y

D E

N

E

W

E

A

L

A

N

D

G

S

P

CT'

N

M

E;D

1

{C,A

L

L

Y

N

E

C

E

5

S

A

R

Y

V

V

r 1 A

~

0

W

T

E

C

ïï:

B

L

00

F

1

E

L

D

September Issue

M 1 G R

SH0E

TAND1NG

B

U

E

s|^p)

R 0

TITR)

0 D 1

ARCH1V1NGFUNC

T10N

1 NtE

T R U M

N

X

T

E

A

THYR01D

F

L

E

0

E

N

"R"

N

E

E

B

SADERS

RESP0NS

L

E

V

T

THREE

C0UR

SGE

1

G0A

¿¿x'

ADVERTISING DIRECTORY

RS#

50

68

19

N/A

86

10

78

83

69

22

5

36

37

26

95

17

76

59

2

4

98

23

55

31

52

88

N/A

57

43

38

72

81

64

21

35

13

29

27

67

16

54

49

99

42

N/A

73

ADVERTISER

3 Care Therapeutics. LLC

Access Heatlh Consultants

AC Grace

AMC

Amrex- Zetron

Antalgic Trak

Anthony Robbins

Atrium

Axiom Worldwide

Biopharma Scientific

Bonaparte Galleries

Breakthrough Coaching

Chiropractie Leadership Alliance

Chirotouch

Chopra Centers

CMCS

Demartini Seminars

Disc Force

Douglas Laboratories

Enzyme Formulations

Eon Systems

Erchonia

Fernandez Consultiing

Foot Levelers

Footmaxx

F4CP

Freedom Awaits

Human Touch. Lie

Impac

!n Phase Technologies

Integrated Orthotics Labs

King Bio

Kool N' Fit

Leander Health Tech

Life West University

Matlin

Multi Radiance

Nutri-West

Oxyhealth Inc-

Parker College Of Chiropractic

PBI / Myovision

Sombra

Stately Creations

Texas Beautiful Image, Inc.

Ulan Nutritional Systems

Universal Del Medical

Pt)/;

30

18

7

BB

51

27

48

1

28

43

28

30,31

C4

33

52

54

31

21

3.25

37

24

5

56

02,23

C3

61

11

39

44,45

9

17

29

48

2

57

47

36

13

16

53

49

41

18

38

19

56

60 I The American Chiropractor I OCTOBER 2008 www.amchiropractor.com