spectral decomposition of cloud radiative effect and … · spectral decomposition of cloud...
TRANSCRIPT
SpectralDecompositionofCloudRadiativeEffectandCloudRadiativeFeedbacks
Xiuhong Chen,XiangleiHuangTheUniversityofMichigan
QingYueCaltech/JPL
TheBillRossow Symposium:Clouds,TheirProperties,andTheirClimateFeedbacksJune6,2017,NewYork
Acknowledgements:NASATerra/Aqua&CloudSat Programs
Outline• Whygofrombroadbandtospectral?
– Twoexamples• TraitsinthespectraldecompositionofCRE• Band-by-bandLWCRE:CESMvs.obs• Band-by-bandLWcloudfeedbacks:2xCO2CESMsimulations
• Band-by-bandLWshort-termcloudradiativefeedbacks(fluctuations):modelvs.obs in2003-2013
• DiscussionandConclusions
Whatspectraldimensioncanoffer?Revealcompensatingdifferencesthatcannotberevealedinbroadbanddiagnosticsalone.
Spectraldecompositionofbroadbandlapse-ratefeedback(Huangetal.,2014,GRL)
LWBroadband H2Obands(0-540cm-1,>1400cm-1) windowregion(800-980cm-1)
òò
D
DDD
-=
v sv
vv svv
dvTB
TOAFdvTBg
)(
)()(
clear-skygreen-houseefficiencyAMIPrunsforcedbyobservedSST
Obs fromcollocatedAIRSandCERES(Huangetal.,2008;Chenetal.,2013)
(GEOS5simulationprovidedbyL.Oreopoulos etal;CanAM4providedbyJ.Cole)
A trait of spectral (band-by-band) CRE
CRELW =σTs4 −[ fσTc
4 + (1− f )σTs4 ]= f σTs
4 −σTc4"# $%
CRE(Δv) = f [Fclr (Δv)−Fcld (Δv)] Fractional contribution
r(Δv) = CRE(Δv)CRELW
=Fclr (Δv)−Fcld (Δv)
σTs4 −σTc
4"# $%
t>>1Cloudfraction:f
Fclr(Dv)
Surface
Fcld(Dv)
Tc
Ts
r(Dv) changes with Tc
288K250K220K
1. Blackbody cloud2. Ignore atmospheric absorption
Band-to-Band ratio: sensitive to CTH but not cloud amountLW CRE: sensitive to both CTH and cloud amountOutcome: ratio-then-broadband approach (Huang et al., 2014, J Climate)
Derivationofspectralfluxes/CRE/feedbacks
• Observations– InvertfromAIRSradiancesfollowingthescenetypeclassificationofCERES(Huangetal.,2008;Chenetal,2013;Huangetal.,2014)
– Outcome:spectralfluxat10cm-1intervalovertheentireLWspectrum(09/2002topresent)
– Observation-basedcloudradiativekernel(Yue etal.,2016)• Models
– Simplecodemodificationtooutputband-by-bandfluxes– Spectralradiativekernels(Huangetal.,2014,GRL)toderivespectraldetailsofPlanck/Lapse-rate/WVfeedbacks
– Adjustmentmethodstogetspectralcloudradiativefeedbacks
Observedaveragesof2003-2015
CAM5forcedwithobservedSSTfrom2003to2015(totalrun2000-2015)
DifferencesofModel- Obs
Observation Band-by-bandCRE(RRTMG_LWbandwidths)
500-630cm-1
820-980cm-1
Observation:2003-2015 CAM5forcedbyobservedSST2003-2015
(Wm-2)
(Wm-2)
500-630cm-1 500-630cm-1
820-980cm-1 820-980cm-1
CESMfully-coupledrun30-yearmean
Band-by-bandLWcloudfeedbackintheNCARCESM(2xCO2 run)
BroadbandLWcloudfeedbackSlaboceanrun:0.25Wm-2/KFullycoupledrun:0.31Wm-2/K
Notscaledwiththeband-by-banddecompositionofCRE
10-250cm-1,0.005(globalval) 250-500cm-1, 0.044 500-630cm-1,0.095
700-820cm-1,0.102 820-980cm-1,0.017 980-1080cm-1,0.017
1080-1180cm-1,2e-4 1180-1390cm-1,0.020 1390-1480cm-1,0.004
Fullycoupledrun CloudfeedbackineachbandWm-2/K
Short-termfluctuationof2003-2015(Preliminary)
• CESMsimulation:usingDessler’s methodtoobtainanestimationofshort-termcloudfeedback
• Observation:applyingYue etal.(2016)toMODIS,AIRSandCERESdatatoobtainthesamequantity
CESM,0.61Wm-2/K Obs,-0.21Wm-2/K
Long-termvs.short-termcontrast
BroadbandLWcloudfeedbackSlaboceanrun:0.25Wm-2/KFullycoupledrun:0.31Wm-2/KForcedSSTrun:0.61Wm-2/KObservation:-0.21Wm-2/K
ConclusionandDiscussion
• Spectraldecompositionhelpsrevealingcompensatingbiases.– Forcloud,ithelpsuntanglethebiasesinCTHandcloudamount
• ForRRTMGbandwidths,820-980cm-1contributesmosttotheCRE.But700-820cm-1contributesmosttothecloudfeedback(2xCO2 run)
• Thelong-termvs.short-termcloudfeedbackhasdifferentspectraldecomposition– Implications
T(z)
qH2O(z)qO3(z)qCH4(z)…
Aerosols
Tskin,es(v)
Geophysical variables Broadband Radiation Budget
F = Fv dvΔv∫
ITOA (v;θ,φ)Broadband Radiative Feedbacks
λx = −δx FδX
δXδTs
Spectral Radiances
Sounding communityEnergy budget and feedbackscommunity
Spectral FluxFv = dφ ITOA (v;θ,φ)cosθ sinθ dθ0
π2∫0
2π∫
λxv = −δx FvδX
δXδTs
Spectral Radiative Feedbacks
Cloud,ISCCPeffort
ThankYou!References:1. Huangetal.,2008:SpectrallyresolvedfluxesderivedfromcollocatedAIRSandCERES
measurementsandtheirapplicationinmodelevaluation,PartI:clearskyoverthetropicaloceans, JGR-Atmospheres,113,D09110,doi:10.1029/2007JD009219.
2. Chenetal.,2013:Comparisonsofclear-skyoutgoingfar-IRfluxinferredfromsatelliteobservationsandcomputedfromthreemostrecentreanalysisproducts,JournalofClimate,26(2),478-494,doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00212.1.
3. Huangetal.,2014:Aglobalclimatologyofoutgoinglongwave spectralcloudradiativeeffectandassociatedeffectivecloudproperties,JournalofClimate,27,7475-7492,doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00663.1.
4. Huang,X.L.,X.H.Chen,B.J.Soden,X.Liu,2014:ThespectraldimensionoflongwavefeedbacksintheCMIP3andCMIP5experiments,GeophysicalResearchLetters,41,doi:10.1002/2014GL061938.
5. Yue,Q.,B.H.Kahn,E.J.Fetzer,M.Schreier,S.Wong,X.H.Chen,X.L.Huang,2016:Observation-basedLongwaveCloudRadiativeKernelsDerivedfromtheA-Train,JournalofClimate,29,2023-2040.
Monthly griddedspectralfluxandCREavailableviahttp://www-personal.umich.edu/~xianglei/datasets.html.Thespectralradiative kernelsavailableuponrequest.
10-250cm-1,0.003 250-500cm-1, 0.046 500-630cm-1,0.072
700-820cm-1,0.070 820-980cm-1,0.023 980-1080cm-1,0.012
1080-1180cm-1,0.002 1180-1390cm-1,0.020 1390-1480cm-1,0.004
Slaboceanrun,6-35yrCloudfeedbackWm-2/K
CERES2s radiometriccalibrationuncertainty:1%(i.e.~2.5Wm-2)
Surface Type
Daytime Nighttime
OLRAIRS_Huang-OLRCERES(Wm-2)
OLRAIRS_Huang-OLRCERES (Wm-2)
Forest 0.58±1.43 -0.42±1.41
Savannas -0.03±2.52 0.68±1.50
Grasslands 0.19±2.61 0.63±1.65
Dark Desert -0.71±2.85 0.36±1.74
Bright Desert 1.67±2.62 1.42±2.28
Ocean 1.09±1.55 0.90±1.26
Allcollocatedclear-skyobservationsin2004(80°S-80°N)
(Chen et al., J Climate, 2013)
StratifyingOLRAIRS_Huang-OLRCERES(Wm-2):cloudyobservationsoverthelands
∆Tsc
f
Overdeserts Overnon-desertlands
<15k 15K-40K >40K <15k 15K-40K >40K
0.001-0.52.44±3.79
(0.9%)
3.25±5.12
(1.2%)
1.49±7.61
(0.5%)
2.34±2.86
(0.8%)
3.62±4.48
(1.3%)
2.84±5.94
(1.0%)
0.5-0.752.79±4.16
(1.1%)
3.34±7.80
(1.3%)
1.39±12.75
(0.5%)
2.90±3.86
(1.1%)
4.24±7.25
(1.7%)
2.61±11.38
(1.0%)
0.75-0.9992.67±3.67
(1.1%)
1.45±6.47
(0.6%)
-1.17±10.97
(-0.5%)
2.81±3.56
(1.2%)
3.14±6.68
(1.4%)
0.47±11.45
(0.2%)
0.999-1.02.61±2.80
(1.2%)
3.15±4.00
(1.6%)
1.28±6.64
(0.7%)
2.86±2.83
(1.3%)
4.04±4.33
(2.0%)
2.48±7.16
(1.5%)
CERES2s radiometriccalibrationuncertainty:1%(i.e.~2.5Wm-2)