special education, then & now

22
Special Education, Then & Now January 20, 1972; Hubert H. Humphrey introduces a Bill mandating education for children with disabilities. – I introduce…a bill…to insure equal opportunities for the handicapped by prohibiting needless discrimination in programs receiving federal financial assistance… – These people have a right to live, to work to the best of their ability – to know the dignity to which every human being is entitled.

Upload: kyna

Post on 20-Jan-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Special Education, Then & Now. January 20, 1972; Hubert H. Humphrey introduces a Bill mandating education for children with disabilities. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Special Education, Then & Now

Special Education, Then & Now

January 20, 1972; Hubert H. Humphrey introduces a Bill mandating education for children with disabilities.– I introduce…a bill…to insure equal

opportunities for the handicapped by prohibiting needless discrimination in programs receiving federal financial assistance…

– These people have a right to live, to work to the best of their ability – to know the dignity to which every human being is entitled.

Page 2: Special Education, Then & Now

November 29, 1975

President Gerald Ford, upon signing federal legislation (94-142) to mandate education for children with disabilities:– …this bill promises more than the federal

government can deliver, and its good intentions could be thwarted by the many unwise provisions it contains…

– Supporters of this legislation…are falsely raising the expectations of the groups affected by claiming authorization levels which are excessive and unrealistic

Page 3: Special Education, Then & Now

A Special Education Controversy

Who belongs in schools? How far do schools need to stretch to meet

student needs?

The debate continues into the new millennium

Welcome to the front lines of the new All-American Hundred Years War!

Page 4: Special Education, Then & Now

A Challenge: Think for Yourself

When was the first time you saw someone with a disability?

What do you remember? Compare your recollections with those of

someone one generation older – and one younger.

The differences will be startling!

Page 5: Special Education, Then & Now

30 Years Ago

Your local school could refuse to admit a child with a disability.

There was no place in the local school for a child with a disability.

The child and his/her parents were not welcome.

The child and the parents belonged someplace else, any place but not this place – the local community school

Page 6: Special Education, Then & Now

A Parent’s Choice: 30 Years Ago

Teach your child at home (or just have him spend his days there).

Find a space in a kind school run by dedicated religious people.

Have your child “put away” in a faceless institution for life (terminal care)

Page 7: Special Education, Then & Now

The Schools of Today

Children with disabilities are the focus of concentrated attention.

Trained professionals and researchers strive to understand disabilities and to address specific teaching methods and approaches.

Teachers actively adapt instruction. Program options seem limitless. Isolation at home, in institutions or on the

streets has been significantly reduced.

Page 8: Special Education, Then & Now

The Schools of Today: Part 2

Students with disabilities are separated into sections of the school where no one else ever goes.

No one thinks to include students with disabilities in class parties, etc.

Once formal schooling ends, many young adults with disabilities are without jobs because there is no guaranteed support

Page 9: Special Education, Then & Now

Special Education Arguments ‘02 Has the promise of special education been

met or exceeded? Has society done too much or not enough? How have the dreams of Hubert Humphrey

and the cautions of Gerald Ford been realized?

Think about the people with disabilities you remember.

I can never forget “The Room” nor the smells and things I witnessed at Walter E. Fernald School, Waltham, Massachusetts

Page 10: Special Education, Then & Now

Does Inclusion Work?

Current legislation (IDEA’97) supports inclusion as the best way to educate students with disabilities.

Critics fear that these students will lose access to necessary, specially designed instruction in the inclusionary rush to return them to the very classrooms in which they experienced failure.

What do you think?

Page 11: Special Education, Then & Now

What does Inclusion deliver?

Disability advocates affirm the positive outcomes of inclusion.

Public school administrators express concern that inclusion does not provide appropriate preparation for successful life following school.

What do you think?

Page 12: Special Education, Then & Now

Least Trained & Most Needy

Untrained teacher assistants spend too much time closely attached to individual students, often hindering the involvement of certified teachers and nondisabled peers.

Professionally trained classroom teachers are often less prepared than some assistants to work with children in inclusive settings and are unprepared to supervise assistants.

What do you think?

Page 13: Special Education, Then & Now

National Council on Disability

An independent federal agency dedicated to promoting policies, programs, practices and procedures that guarantee equal opportunity and empowerment of all individuals with disabilities

Reported in January 2000, that all 50 U.S. states are out of compliance with special education law and that must be remedied by increased federal attention.

What do you think?

Page 14: Special Education, Then & Now

Is Special Education Too Expensive? Critics contend that the number of students

identified with disabilities in increasing at an excessive rate because of funding systems that encourage over identification.

Advocates say that enrollment and costs are increasing primarily because of the increased numbers of children with more significant disabilities.

What do you think?

Page 15: Special Education, Then & Now

The Center for Special Education Finance (CSEF) Estimates that the cost of educating a child

with disabilities is 2.28 times that of educating a child without disabilities.

Actual expenditures vary widely based on individual need.

The beginnings of special education shifted responsibilities away from institutions, hospitals, insurance companies, and social agencies to schools but money has not accompanied this shift in responsibilities.

Page 16: Special Education, Then & Now

What caused the big shift?

Advances in medical technology Deinstitutionalization of children with

special needs Privatization of services Economic and Social Factors including

increases in the number of children in poverty and the number of families experiencing social and economic stress.

Page 17: Special Education, Then & Now

Medical Technology Advances

Children who would not have otherwise survived due to prematurity or disability are now surviving.

Those whose disabilities would have previously placed them in a hospital or institution are able to enter public school.

Special Education services are often recommended at infancy and children are placed in early intervention programs.

Page 18: Special Education, Then & Now

Deinstitutionalization and Privatization

The shift from state institutions toward a reliance on local school districts and collaborative or private placements is a positive one.

It provides better services within a less restrictive environment; however,

The financial resources to fund this shift did not come with the children.

Page 19: Special Education, Then & Now

A Challenging Dilemma

Children enter schools with greater needs. These needs are identified at an earlier age. The increased cost seriously compromises

regular education programs, often leading to things like larger class sizes.

We need a solution that does not blame the children or those working with them and does not pit regular education against special education.

Page 20: Special Education, Then & Now

Special Education Is Costly

PL 94-142 (1975) established a federal commitment to pay 40% of the excess cost of its special education mandate.

Currently the federal government contributes approximately 12%.

Is this a debate about cost or scarce resources?

Is this an argument about how to pay or whether to pay?

Page 21: Special Education, Then & Now

The Reality of Costs

Schools have done a good job containing costs.

Schools have rigorously applied eligibility standards and provided regular education and inclusive programming for children as alternatives to special education services.

The root causes of these increases have been factors beyond the control of schools.

Page 22: Special Education, Then & Now

Welcome to Special Education

Despite nearly 30 years of growth and progress, arguments and controversy about special education continue.

The history is short and defined by legislation since many elements of our laws are vague and undefined.

Clarity is often achieved through litigation. The foundations of special education shift

with a single court decision.