speaking assessment criteria
DESCRIPTION
SPEAKING Assessment Criteria. SPEAKING Assessment Criteria. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Mark
COMMUNICATION
Criteria
9-10
Very GoodInformation, ideas and points of view are presented and explained with confidence. Can narrate events when appropriate.
7-8
GoodA good amount of information andpoints of view are conveyed andregularly developed
5-6 SufficientA reasonable amount of informationand points of view are conveyed andsometimes developed
3-4
LimitedSome simple information andopinions are conveyed. Few responses are developed.
1–2 PoorLittle relevant informationcommunicated.Very few appropriate responses aredeveloped.
0 No relevant information conveyed. A zero score.
RANGE OF LANGUAGEMark Criteria
9–10 A wide range of vocabulary,complex structures and a variety ofverb tenses. Errors usually appearin more complex structures.
7–8 A range of vocabulary; somecomplex structures and a variety ofverb tenses attempted, though notalways well formed. Some errorsoccur but the message is clear.
5–6 Limited vocabulary; sentencesgenerally simple but occasionallymore complex. Errors are quitefrequent, but the language is moreaccurate than inaccurate.
3–4 Very limited vocabulary; short,simple sentences. Errors veryfrequent.
1–2 Isolated words of vocabulary.Occasional short phrases. Errorsoften impede communication.
0 No language produced is worthyof credit.
SPEAKINGAssessment Criteria
INTERACTION AND FLUENCY
Mark Criteria
5 Responds readily and showsinitiative. Conversation sustainedat a reasonable speed, languageexpressed fluently.
4 Answers without hesitation andextends responses beyond theminimum with some flow oflanguage.
3 Ready responses; some evidence ofan ability to sustain a conversation;little if any initiative.
2 Some reaction. Sometimes hesitant,little natural flow of language.
1 Little reaction. Very hesitant anddisjointed.
0 No language produced isworthy of credit.
PRONUNCIATION AND INTONATION
Mark Criteria5 Responds readily and shows
initiative. Conversation sustainedat a reasonable speed, languageexpressed fluently.
4 Answers without hesitation andextends responses beyond theminimum with some flow oflanguage.
3 Ready responses; some evidence ofan ability to sustain a conversation;little if any initiative.
2 Some reaction. Sometimes hesitant,little natural flow of language.
1 Little reaction. Very hesitant anddisjointed.
0 No language produced isworthy of credit.
Mark
COMMUNICATION
Criteria
9-10
Very GoodInformation, ideas and points of view are presented and explained with confidence. Can narrate events when appropriate.
7-8
GoodA good amount of information andpoints of view are conveyed andregularly developed
5-6 SufficientA reasonable amount of informationand points of view are conveyed andsometimes developed
3-4
LimitedSome simple information andopinions are conveyed. Few responses are developed.
1–2 PoorLittle relevant informationcommunicated.Very few appropriate responses aredeveloped.
0 No relevant information conveyed. A zero score.
RANGE OF LANGUAGEMark Criteria
9–10 A wide range of vocabulary,complex structures and a variety ofverb tenses. Errors usually appearin more complex structures.
7–8 A range of vocabulary; somecomplex structures and a variety ofverb tenses attempted, though notalways well formed. Some errorsoccur but the message is clear.
5–6 Limited vocabulary; sentencesgenerally simple but occasionallymore complex. Errors are quitefrequent, but the language is moreaccurate than inaccurate.
3–4 Very limited vocabulary; short,simple sentences. Errors veryfrequent.
1–2 Isolated words of vocabulary.Occasional short phrases. Errorsoften impede communication.
0 No language produced is worthyof credit.
SPEAKINGAssessment Criteria
INTERACTION AND FLUENCY
Mark Criteria
5 Responds readily and showsinitiative. Conversation sustainedat a reasonable speed, languageexpressed fluently.
4 Answers without hesitation andextends responses beyond theminimum with some flow oflanguage.
3 Ready responses; some evidence ofan ability to sustain a conversation;little if any initiative.
2 Some reaction. Sometimes hesitant,little natural flow of language.
1 Little reaction. Very hesitant anddisjointed.
0 No language produced isworthy of credit.
PRONUNCIATION AND INTONATION
Mark Criteria5 Responds readily and shows
initiative. Conversation sustainedat a reasonable speed, languageexpressed fluently.
4 Answers without hesitation andextends responses beyond theminimum with some flow oflanguage.
3 Ready responses; some evidence ofan ability to sustain a conversation;little if any initiative.
2 Some reaction. Sometimes hesitant,little natural flow of language.
1 Little reaction. Very hesitant anddisjointed.
0 No language produced isworthy of credit.