spe distinguished lecturer · pdf filespe distinguished lecturer program primary funding is...
TRANSCRIPT
1
SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program
Primary funding is provided by
The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe
The Society is grateful to those companies that allow their professionals to serve as lecturers
Additional support provided by AIME
Society of Petroleum Engineers Distinguished Lecturer Programwww.spe.org/dl
Birol Dindoruk
Reservoir Fluid Properties (PVT): Issues, Pitfalls and Modeling Aspects
Shell International Exp. & Prod. Inc.
Society of Petroleum Engineers Distinguished Lecturer Programwww.spe.org/dl
3
Outline• Purpose/Motivation• Impact (Examples)
– Well Testing– Surface Oil Volume, Reservoir Depletion Performance
• Sources of PVT data– Main Focus Areas
• QC Considerations/Modeling Issues– Measurement errors/Sample consistency– Rules-of-thumb/Difficult Fluids– OBM– Compositional Grading/Multiple PVT’s– Viscosity– EOR
• Summary
4
Why Do We Need PVT Data?
• Many petroleum engineering calculations require PVT data:– Reserves, reservoir connectivity– Reservoir simulation/Material balance– Pressure transient testing– EOR/Injection processes– Flow-line, wellbore hydraulics calculations– Flow assurance– Production allocation and calibration– Tax implications/qualifications/quotas– Production Sharing Agreements (PSA’s)– Drilling and completion fluids
5
Example(s): Well testing equation(s), MBE
Bottom Line: Most of the equations that we use have coefficients/parameters that are functions of fluid properties.
ooBmhqk �6.162��
6
From reservoir to surface –Pressure, Volume and Temperature changes
Surface
Oil Reservoir
GOR behavior, Boi
G
OO
PVTDescription
7
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600CUMULATIVE OIL PRODUCTION (MSTB)
GO
R (S
CF/
STB
)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
GOR (SCF/STB) Pressure (psia)
From Craft & Hawkins
Reservoir Performance/Time Dependent Behavior
Pbp
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000Pressure (psia)
Oil
Visc
osity
(cp)
8
Sources of PVT data
• PVT Experiments/Measurements (need fluid samples)– Surface/Subsurface Samples
• Correlations/Analog Data• Equation of State (EOS)
representation (i.e., cubic)
Estimation/Calculation of PVT Properties
Sutton (2005)
� �22 2 bbVV
abV
RTP��
��
��
9
What Happens From Reservoir to Separators?
Plants, etc.
SurfaceFacilityModeling
Reservoir/ ProcessModeling
WellboreSimulation
10
RE: Main Focus Areas
• Primary and Secondary Production– Typically fluid properties/depletion
characteristics from reservoir to separators• Interaction with non-native (i.e., EOR)
fluids– Experiments/Modeling to capture EOR
processes (i.e., IFT� 0)• Modeling the desired processes (“EOS
work”)
11
Some Aspects of QC Considerations
• Fluid Type• Data Quality
– Sample– Lab Data
• Minimum Data Requirements• Transport Properties (Viscosity)• EOS vs Data
12
P-T Diagrams/Phase Envelope
70%
50%
20%
90%
10%
“GAS”
Pdp
2
1
Tsep&Psep
CP
PiPi
“OIL”
100% L
T
1=wet gas2=dry gas
P
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44TIME (hr)
Inst
anta
neou
s G
OR
(MSC
F/Se
p B
BL)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000P (psia)
Liq
% @
Tre
s
Liq % (Data)Liq % (Calc)
13
Classification of Reservoir Fluids
– “Cut off”/”rule of thumb” (i.e., Mc Cain)– P-T diagrams
Property BlackOil
VolatileOil
Retrograde Gas
Wet Gas Dry Gas
Initial GOR(SCF/STB)
<1750 1750-3200
>3200 >15000(<66bc/mmcf)
>100,000(<10bc/mmcf)
Initial Stock Oil, oAPI
<45 >40 >40 <70 None
C7+ >20% 20-12.5%
<12.5% <4% <0.7%
??
14
80
100
120
140
160
180
80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220Separator Temperature (F)
CG
R (S
TB/M
MSC
F)
#1#2Extended Flow1st Stage CGR: Psep = 389.7 psia (139.3 STB/MMSCF)1st Stage CGR: Psep =389.7 psia (119.5 STB/MMSCF)1st Stage CGR: Psep =550 psia (119.5 STB/MMSCF)
Impact of Test Separator Conditions on CGR
15
PCP
Pbp
T
P1 & T1
TresT1
P1 & T1
Low-T Extrapolation
Pres & Tres
Pres & Tres
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
-200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400T (F)
P (p
sia)
DATACRIT
16
Oil Base Mud (OBM) Contamination
• Specially designed HC/Oil-Base Fluids• Pose challenges to get clean samples
0.01
10.01
20.01
30.01
40.01
50.01
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Carbon Number
Wei
ght%
Acceptable C
ontamination
Black OilDry Gas
10%A
cceptable Contam
ination
Black OilDry Gas
10%
?
17
Influence of Drilling Mud/Treatments[Contamination]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
S ample Numbe r
Mas s fraction at S andface
Mas
s Fr
actio
n
N2C1
CO2C3
C4C6
C7C18
C19P
MC14
MC16
MC18
OB
MR
eser
voir
Oil+
Gas
Reservoir-1.0 0.1
-1.0 0.1
-0.80-0.70
-0.60-0.50
-0.40-0.30
-0.20-0.10
0.000.10
0.200.30
0.400.50
0.60
-0.7
0-0
.60
-0.5
0-0
.40
-0.3
0-0
.20
-0.1
00.
000.
100.
200.
300.
400.
500.
600.
7
0.00 2.50 5.00 inches
0.00
0.07
0.13
0.20
0.27
0.33
0.40
0.47
0.53
0.60
0.67
0.73
0.80
0.87
0.93
1.00
18
Oil Base Mud Contamination: Condensate
0
10
20
30
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000Pressure (psia)
Liqu
id V
olum
e (%
)
Liq %_exp (199 F) -- CONTAMINATEDLiq %_cpk (199 F) -- CONTAMINATEDLiq %_cpk (199 F) -- UNCONTAMINATED
0
10
20
30
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000Pressure (psia)
Liqu
id V
olum
e (%
)
Liq %_exp (199 F) -- CONTAMINATEDLiq %_cpk (199 F) -- CONTAMINATEDLiq %_cpk (199 F) -- UNCONTAMINATED0.01
10.01
20.01
30.01
40.01
50.01
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Carbon Number
Wei
ght%
19
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
0 10 20 30 40 50% Oil Base Mud (w/w)
Pbp
@ 2
00 F
(psi
a)Stock Tank Oil
Reservoir Fluid
Oil Base Mud Contamination: Oil
20
Compositional Grading• Compositional Grading
– Equilibrium– Non-equilibrium
• No data = No problem (“no brain & no headache”)
Depth
Detailed review is in SPE109284
Enabling Technologies: Advances in Subsurface Sampling Techniques
Anshultz Ranch SPE14412, As described by Metcalfe et al.
r1
r1
r4r3
r2
SPE116243 & 124264
21
Compositional Grading: GOR versus DepthCompositional Grading: GOR versus Depth
9000
9500
10000
10500
11000
11500
0 10000 20000 30000
GOR (SCF/STB)
Dep
th (f
t)
GOC
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
-200 0 200 400 600 800 1000T (F)
P (p
sia)
Critical Point
Black OilGas
Pres
Tres
GAS
OIL
22
9000
9500
10000
10500
11000
11500
12000
12500
13000
13500
14000
7500 8500 9500 10500 11500 12500 13500Pressure/Saturation Pressure (psia)
Dep
th (f
eet)
OIL/LIQUID
CONDENSATE/VAPOR
23
• Inferred quantity (transport property)• Leading Industrial Measurement Techniques
– Electromagnetic Viscosity Measurement– Rolling Ball Techniques– Capillary Tube– Fann-Type Devices
Liquid Phase Viscosity (Measurement Aspects)
24
Liquid Phase Viscosity (Computational Aspects)
• Heavy ends have the largest impact on liquid viscosity
• Better characterization of the plus fractions can improve the results significantly: granularity matters!
• Viscosity Models– Lohrenz-Bray-Clark/Jossi et al. Model– Corresponding States models– Friction models– Black oil correlations
25Stalkup
EOR Aspects
Dependence of residual oil saturation to capillary number
�uNCa �
26
Impact of Temperature: Viscosity
Farouq Ali (1982) SPE 9897
27
EOS The Final “Assembly” Step:
• Limitations inherent to two-constant cubic EOS (Mainly Peng and Robinson EOS and Soave modified Redlich and Kwong EOS)– Semi-empirical nature of the EOS– Volume prediction– Mixing rules– Having a fixed critical Z-factor for all the
components, etc.• Inexact fluid description (Single Carbon
Number grouping rather than detailed compositional breakdown)
PREDICTIVE CAPABILITY ISSUES:
28
Summary
• Proper PVT data/work is needed to capture– Depletion performance of the reservoir and– Interaction of injectants and the in-situ fluids
• Consistent fluid description is needed from the reservoir to the delivery point.
• “Difficult fluids” (near-critical systems, heavy fluids, contaminated fluids, lean condensates, graded systems) pose challenges– Characterization/modeling aspects– Computational aspects– Initialization aspects– Measurement aspects
29
Summary
• PVT/Fluid Properties should be used to complement the G&G information
• EOS/Computational Aspects:– QC of the data is a must– Better viscosity prediction/modeling is needed– Sample characterization/representation with minimum
# of components– Multiple (PVT’s) sample characterizations poses a
challenge
30
QUESTIONS ?