spaceobs wp2: coupling simulations to data - lpp · spaceobs wp2 : coupling simulations to...
TRANSCRIPT
-
SPACEOBSWP2: Coupling Simulations to DataWP2: Coupling Simulations to Data
Philippe Bousquet (LSCE)
Éric Buchlin (IAS)
1
-
• Sun and Earth are large and complex systems which cannot be represented at all time scales and spatial locations by direct observations,
• Numerical models have to be developed to simulate their properties and evolution
• Models allow (among other things) to interpret observations (data analysis), to provide a 4D optimized view of relevant variables (data assimilation), and to access to forecast or parameter optimization capabilities.
SPACEOBS WP2 : Coupling simulations to observations
10 years of mid-tropospheric CH4 from IASI/MetOp A and
IASI/MetOp-B averaged from July 2007 to July 2016
Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) observed by the Solar Dynamics
Observatory (SDO) on 31 August 2012 at 17.1 and 30.4 nm.
2
-
Models have to be correctly initiated in time (initial conditions) and space(boundary conditions), compared to observations (forward modelling), but alsooptimized against observations (using inversion methods).
satellitedata
Spaceweather
SPACEOBS WP2 : Coupling simulations to observations
Initial & boundaryconditions
satellitedata
Numericalpredictions
Numericalmodel
Data
assimilation
data
Comparison to observations
In-situObs.
Otherdata
Inversion to optimize inputsData
assimilation
Forward process modelling
GHGcycles
3
-
satellitedata
Spaceweather
SPACEOBS WP2 : Coupling simulations to observations
• Forward simulation of the solar coronal structure and evolution tostudy the emergence of solar events at the Sun’s surface, theirpropagation and interaction with the Earth
• Inverse simulation of the Earth carbon cycle using satellite data, as akey component of the ongoing climate change.
Objectives
Initial & boundaryconditions
satellitedata
Numericalpredictions
Numericalmodel
Data
assimilation
data
Comparison to observations
In-situObs.
Otherdata
Inversion to optimize inputsData
assimilation
Forward process modelling
GHGcycles
4
-
satellitedata
Spaceweather
SPACEOBS WP2 : Coupling simulations to observations
• Developing synergies in data assimilation between space weatherand greenhouse gases (ideas, cross-fertilization, good practices)
• Results of simulations performed will be fed into the relevantdatabases of UPSay (MEDOC and CDS/ESPRI)
Objectives
Initial & boundaryconditions
satellitedata
Numericalpredictions
Numericalmodel
Data
assimilation
data
Comparison to observations
In-situObs.
Otherdata
Inversion to optimize inputsData
assimilation
Forward process modelling
GHGcycles
5
-
SPACEOBS WP2.1 : A contribution
to space weather science
Contributors: Sacha Brun, Tahar Amari, N. Aunai, E. Buchlin, R. Grappin, Miho Janvier, R. Modolo, R. Smets
Involved laboratories: AIM, CPhT, IAS, LATMOS, LPP
6
-
• 11-yr solar activity cycle• Complex magnetic and
thermal structure
• Dynamical events: flares, Coronal Mass
SPACEOBS WP2.1 : A contribution to space weather science
Sun/heliosphere system: complex and variable
/EIT
flares, Coronal Mass Ejections (CME)…
• Propagation through the heliosphere, interaction with Earth environment
7
SoH
O/E
ITSS
T
-
SDO/AIA, NAFE, MEDOC
-
9
SoHO/EIT, SoHO/LASCO
-
• Models need to be able to reproducethese structures/events, which areat the origin of Space Weather
• Ultimate target: ability to forecast
SPACEOBS WP2.1 : A contribution to space weather science
Modelling of Sun/heliosphere
• Ultimate target: ability to forecast– emergence and triggering of solar events at the Sun– their propagation in the heliosphere– their interaction with the Earth environment
• Huge efforts made, but not easy!(large range of scales and physical processes)
10
-
SPACEOBS WP2.1 : A contribution to space weather science
1. Multi-scale photospheric magnetic field maps
Solar observations of the magnetic field (B):• Full disk or synoptic maps of projected B• Vector B in SDO/HMI active regions• Processed and combined SoHO/MDI, Hinode/SOT, Canou 2011
11
Result: multi-scale B maps (boundary condition for coronal models, and to be compared to magnetic field generation models)
-
SPACEOBS WP2.1 : A contribution to space weather science
2. 3D model of magnetic field generation and emergence
ASH code (anelastic MHD, AIM):
• Dynamo in the convective zone of the Sun• Complex interactions between compressible
turbulence and solar rotation
• Gives 11-yr cycle, sunspots/active regions…
12
• Gives 11-yr cycle, sunspots/active regions…
Result: magnetic field maps close tothe solar surface (comparison toobservations, and boundary conditionsfor coronal models)
Pinto&Brun 2013
-
SPACEOBS WP2.1 : A contribution to space weather science
3a. Data-driven simulations of the corona and heliosphere
Am
ari e
t al
. 20
14
Stru
gare
ket
al.
20
15
13
• 3D MHD (CPhT, AIM): static and dynamic, local and global, with/without currents, with different wind acceleration
• 1D hydrodynamic models (LPP) on B lines from magn. modelsResult: plasma and magnetic environment in the heliosphere; comparison with observations/measurements, or forecast.
Am
ari e
t al
. 20
14
Stru
gare
k
-
SPACEOBS WP2.1 : A contribution to space weather science
3b. Development of a a new massively parallel code
PHARE, a new hybrid Particle-In-Cell code:
• Adapted to the multi-scale physics of magnetic reconnection: better modelling of physical processes in the corona / heliosphere / magnetosphere
• Will allow obtaining better comparisons with
14
• Will allow obtaining better comparisons with observations
Inn
oce
nti
et a
l.
-
SPACEOBS WP2.1 : A contribution to space weather science
4. Comparison between models and observations
Direct comparison of observable quantities:
• Produced by forward-modelling• Obtained by in-situ measurements and remote-sensing
observations of the heliosphere
Feedback on models and their parameters
15
Feedback on models and their parameters
Turc
et a
l. 2
01
3
-
SPACEOBS WP2.1 : A contribution to space weather science
Summary
16
• Optimize use of current space instruments• Prepare for next missions with strong UPSay involvement:
Solar Orbiter (ESA), Solar Probe Plus (NASA).
-
SPACEOBS WP2.2 : A
contribution to GHG science
Contributors: P. Ciais, P. Bousquet, F.-M. Bréon, F. Maignan, G. Broquet,F. Chevallier, R. Armante, V. Capelle, O. Chomette, C. Crevoisier, D. Edouart, F. Gibert, Y. Goulas, A. Ounis, S. Payan, C. Clerbaux, K. Soudani, E. Dufrene.
Involved laboratories: ESE, LATMOS, LMD, LSCE
Objectives:
• Investigate and predict the asset of different observing systems for the monitoring of GHG fluxes, including new spaceborne instrumental concepts.
• Main focus on CO2 but interest for CH4• Instrument concepts proposed by WP3 will be tested when available.
17
-
Context : CO2 and CH4 are the main drivers of climate change
• CO2 concentrations have increasedby more than 35%
• CH4 concentrations have more thandoubled
• These two gases generate 80% of the greenhouse effect increase
SPACEOBS WP2.2 : A contribution to GHG science
The evolution of the Carbon cycle in a climate change context is very uncertain
• Currently, half of anthropogenic CO2 emission are removed from the atmosphere by natural sinks
• The precise location and processes that control these sinks are poorly known• Is the CO2 sink sustainable in the long term, or will it be affected by climate
change?
• Climate-sensitive CH4 sources remain largely uncertain
18
-
SPACEOBS WP2.2 : A contribution to GHG science
LSCE and LMD lead two satellite missions for the monitoring of CO2 and CH4 columns
MICROCARB (CNES)• CO2 (possibly also CH4)• Passive (reflection of sun light at the surface)• UPSay Scientific contributions : LSCE, LMD• Phase B. Budget needs to be completed for next phases• Launch : 2020
MERLIN (CNES/DLR)
19
MERLIN (CNES/DLR)• CH4 only• IPDA Lidar (innovative technology)• UPSAy Scientific contributions:
LSCE (PI, L4), LMD (L0 to L2)• Phase C (hardware starts !)• Launch : 2021
LMD and LSCE also participate to the ESA/FLEX mission recently selected by ESA to monitor vegetation fluorescence (proxy of photosynthesis)
-
SPACEOBS WP2.2 : A contribution to GHG science
Postdoc
• Development and management of the components of a simulation platform for GHG fluxes handling the chain between radiative transfer models LMD), flux inversion systems (LSCE), and land surface models (LSCE, LMD, ESE).
• Analysis and comparison of the potential of existing (e.g. GOSAT, OCO-2, TANSAT, IASI, …) and future missions (e.g. (Microcarb, Merlin, …) expected in this decade for CO2 and potentially CH4
• Labelisation of a PhD on fluorescence (application to IDI doctoral grants)
• GHG columns
• Surface proper es
Radia ve transfer models
Fluoresecence Land
surface model
GHG surface flu
x
e s
Chemistry transport
model
Satellite radiances
GHG global budgets
Photosynthesis Data assimila on
Process model
Product
Postdoc (Spaceobs)
PhD (IDI)
20
-
• No Hardware responsability (CNES, DLR agencies)• Scientific lead and algorithm development• Chain of data:
SPACEOBS WP2.2 : A contribution to GHG science
Level 1
Radiances
Level 2
CO2 ann CH4 Columns
Level 4
Surface fluxes
Inversion of
Radiative
Inversion of
atmospheric
21
Radiative
tranfert
atmospheric
transport
• LMD (LSCE) skills on Level 1 to Level 2• LSCE skills on Level 2 to Level 4• Postdoc :
• Improvement of Radiative transfert chain for Microcarb• Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSE)
MICROCARB MICROCARBMERLIN