sourcing productivity final

27
title title

Upload: balazs-paroczay

Post on 29-Jan-2018

116 views

Category:

Business


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sourcing productivity final

title title

Page 2: Sourcing productivity final

what is the ultimate contribution

of a sourcer?

hire

submission

lead identified

HM interview

recruiter interview

offer

Page 3: Sourcing productivity final

3

submission

lead identified

Page 4: Sourcing productivity final

4

hire

submission

lead identified

HM interview

recruiter interview

offer

Page 5: Sourcing productivity final

5

business case

standard production requires standard procedures

need for high quality control over each production step

production is automatized and repeatable and owned by the sourcer

injected by LEAN waste reduction

continuous process improvement

Page 6: Sourcing productivity final

6

Creating sourcing microsteps 8 sourcing microsteps

1. Pipeline 2. To Be Contacted

3. Contacted

4. Requested More Info 5. Candidate Not Interested 6. Application Received 7. Rejected by Sourcer

8. Candidate Submitted

Page 7: Sourcing productivity final

7

Creating sourcing microsteps 8 sourcing microsteps grouped into 4 action items Candidate Identification

1. Pipeline 2. To Be Contacted

Candidate Connection 3. Contacted

Candidate Engagement 4. Requested More Info 5. Candidate Not Interested 6. Application Received 7. Rejected by Sourcer

Screening & Submissions 8. Candidate Submitted

I

C

E

S

Page 8: Sourcing productivity final

8

I C E S

Page 9: Sourcing productivity final

9

I C E S

If C/I is lower... Too many non-contacted candidates

Building pipeline? Conduct talent mapping? Realized late mismatched profiles? Unsure about candidate profile? Misunderstanding/lack of clarity of the job profile? Need to recap on Vacancy Intake?

>95%

Page 10: Sourcing productivity final

10

I C E S

If E/C is lower... Too many non-replied/non-engaged candidates

Contacted non-relevant profiles? Using not good enough email/phone content? Lack of call to action? Overdose? Credibility issue? Country specific? Other reasons (e.g. holiday season)?

>66%

Page 11: Sourcing productivity final

11

I C E S

If S/E is lower... Too many non-submitted candidates

Can sell the position? Can close the deal (call)? Overqualify? Too many unknown info for the candidate? Was not precise enough in searching?

>15%

Page 12: Sourcing productivity final

I C E S

standardized sourcing production control time spend and motion/activity made predict cost spend plan and forecast productivity

channels countries clients

bring in continuous delivery improvement

Page 13: Sourcing productivity final

13

97% Pretty significant profile results Easy-to-connect

71% Good reply rate Common communication channel High no interest ratio (62% of all

engaged) 11% Very low submission rate Hard to sell Hard to close

13 1

I C E S

Page 14: Sourcing productivity final

14

96% Pretty significant profile results* * Based on 60+ different sourcing channels

73% Exceptional reply rate

15% Standard submission rate

9 1

I C E S

Page 15: Sourcing productivity final

15

94% Just OK 1st conversion rate Could find better quality

candidates

81% Excellent reply rate because

contact details are added

21% Semi-active candidates

6 1

I C E S

Page 16: Sourcing productivity final

16

I

C

E

S

client 1 client 2 client 3

The same technician job in 4 countries. A lot of talent pool building, strong employee referral channel. Similar, four Nordics countries.

New client, quite attractive brand but a rather special one. Only Luxembourg-based jobs but the sourcing scope is international.

Mature RPO client, serving some 20+ countries in EMEA. Widely diverse jobs (Engineering, R&D, IT, Sales etc.). Almost unknown brand.

70% 99%

46%

35%

98%

82%

23%

72%

56%

Page 17: Sourcing productivity final

17

I

C

E

S

client 1 client 2 client 3 4 7 6

1 submission

70% 99%

46%

35%

98%

82%

23%

72%

56%

Page 18: Sourcing productivity final

L x

T = SP

# of qualified candidate leads

Quality C/I x E/C x S/E

(conversion rate)

Time spend SOURCING PRODUCTIVITY

Q

Page 19: Sourcing productivity final

19

implementation Training, training, training, training, training, traini..... Give ownership to Sourcers on production Steering on output rather than input Bi-weekly sourcing performance reports Piñata Day

Page 20: Sourcing productivity final

20

piñataday Boost the last conversion rate (S/E) No new leads, no new reqs –> calling only! S/E: 9,6% 15,6% over 10 weeks

Page 21: Sourcing productivity final

what is the ultimate contribution

of a sourcer?

Page 22: Sourcing productivity final

22

I

C

E

S

client 1 client 2 client 3

H

4 8 7

1 hire

11 50 41

95%

72%

56%

24% 13% 13%

98%

82%

23%

99%

46%

35%

Page 23: Sourcing productivity final
Page 24: Sourcing productivity final
Page 25: Sourcing productivity final

sourcer productivity calculator 200+ shares | 1.000+ visitors

thebalazs.com here!

Page 26: Sourcing productivity final

key take-aways

1.sourcers are here to make hires together with the recruiters

2.productivity targets must be set realistically and based on math (conversion ratios)

3.sourcing productivity can be built as a „LEAN factory”

Sweet and easy

Page 27: Sourcing productivity final

27