sorption—desorption studies of anionic dyes on alumina pretreated with acids
TRANSCRIPT
Colloids and Surfaces, 29 (1988) 373-389 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
373
Sorption-Desorption Studies of Anionic Dyes on Alumina Pretreated with Acids
V.K. JAIN*, G.L. MUNDHARA and J.S. TIWARI
Department of Chemistry, Rauishankar University, Raipur, Madhya Pradesh 492010 (India)
(Received 3 December 1986; accepted in final form 31 August 1987)
ABSTRACT
Sorption-desorption behaviour of the anionic dyes naphthol blue-black (NB) and lissamine green ‘BN’ (LG) on chromatographic alumina, pretreated with mineral acids, is described. Alu- mina samples of surface-phase pH 1.0-8.0 were prepared and studied for their sorption behaviour. The sorption was found to vary with surface pH of the substrate and acid used for pretreatment. Quantitative sorption was shown at pH 6 4.0 (NB) and pH < 3.5 (LG) on A1203 treated with HNO, [A&O,(n) 1, and maximum sorption occurred at pH 5.0 (NB) and pH 5.5 (LG) on Al,O, treated with H,SO, [ Al,O,(s) ] and pH 2.5 (NB) and pH 3.0 (LG) on A&O, treated with H,PO, [ A&O3 (p)] . Variation in sorption with time (10 min-72 h), temperature (30-60°C) and regen- eration of the substrates with aqueous electrolytes is also reported. Desorption efficacy of anions was in the order: PO!- > SOi- > NO,. The acid-treatment, and hence the specifically adsorbed anions (NO;, SO:-, PO:- ) , appears to modify the sorption properties of alumina significantly. It appears that the controlling force for adsorption is predominantly ion exchange. A few synthetic mixtures of the dyes were separated by column chromatography, using inorganic electrolytes as eluents.
1. INTRODUCTION
Separation techniques based on the phenomenon of adsorption have been extensively employed in many fields of research and technology. However, chemical pretreatment of the adsorbent layer, which would enhance or de- crease the capacity for differential separation, appears to be a worthwhile area of investigation. Chromatographic alumina possesses a high concentration of surface hydroxyl ions [ 11, and on chemical pretreatment, its ion-exchange properties are enhanced [ 2-71. Anderson and Malotky [ 81 pointed out that H+ ion concentration and specifically adsorbed anions (e.g., SO:-, PO:- ) modify the electrokinetic behaviour of the adsorbent, and may provide new surface groups, which like the original surface groups, may undergo a protolysis reaction. The adsorbed protolysable anions can perturb the structure of the
*Present address: Geology and Mining Department, Raipur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
0166-6622/88/$03.50 0 1988 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
374
electrokinetic double layer. It was observed [ 81 that the anions lower the iso- electric point or raise the zero point of charge, by as much as four pH units. At a fixed pH, the zeta potential is a function of protolysable anion adsorption, or alternatively, for a fixed degree of anion adsorption, the zeta potential is a function of pH. Therefore, both species, which are potential determinants, may have a role in the selective adsorption of ionic compounds, like dyes, on polar adsorbents. The studies conducted by Fuller [ 91, Jiratova and Beranek [ lo], Singh and Clifford [ 111 emphasised the importance of pretreatment of polar adsorbents with acids.
In our earlier communication [ 121, the sorption-desorption behaviour of the anionic dye Orange II (OG) on alumina pretreated with acids (HNO,, H,SO, and H,PO,) was described. To elaborate upon the work, two other an- ionic dyes, naphthol blue-black (NB) (Michrome No. 1113) and lissamine green ‘BN’ (LG) (C.I. 44090)) were studied. Distribution coefficients for the three dyes and their column chromatographic separation, based on these stud- ies, were also investigated.
2. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
HNO,/H,SO, and H,PO1-treated alumina samples of surface-phase pH 3.5-8.5 and pH 4.0-8.0, respectively, were prepared by washing the original Brockmann alumina (100 g, 100-200 mesh) with acids of different strengths (Table 1). Surface area, OH- ion-exchange capacity and anion content (NO; /SO:- /PO:- ) of the different samples were determined (Table 2).
The dyes NB (E. Merck) and LG (Chroma) were used after repeated crys- tallisation from ethanol-water mixture (1:l v/v) till the absorbance was con- stant, and chromatography showed the presence of only one component. The purified samples were dried at 80°C for 24 h to remove moisture. The II,,, values for NB and LG were determined to be 620 and 629 nm, respectively.
Stock solutions of each dye were prepared in water (0.57 mmol 1-l ) by dis- solving 0.3525 and 0.3297 g 1-l of NB and LG, respectively. From the stock solution, 2.5-80.0 ml aliquots were withdrawn, made up to 100 ml, and esti- mated calorimetrically after suitable dilution. A ‘Spekol’ spectrocolorimeter (Carl Zeiss, accuracy ? 0.5% ) was employed for estimation of the dyes. Ab- sorbance of the dyes is not affected by change in pH (1.0-8.5)) the acid used for the pretreatment or elevated temperature ( 30-60 o C ) .
Adsorption experiments were conducted by equilibrating alumina (0.1 g) with aqueous dye solutions (10 ml) of known concentration. Desorption was studied with aqueous inorganic electrolytes. The procedure for desorption was to equilibrate (24 h, 30 + 1 “C) the adsorbate (10 ml, 0.57 mmol 1-l) with the substrate (0.1 g) , reduce the volume of the solution to 5 ml, followed by addi- tion of the desorbing agent (5 ml). After 30 min, a 5-ml aliquot was withdrawn
TA
BL
E 1
Syn
thes
is o
f al
um
ina
sam
ples
of
vari
ous
surf
ace-
phas
e pH
Su
rfac
e-ph
ase
Init
ial
pH o
f th
e al
um
ina
(100
g)
Str
engt
h o
f ac
id a
dded
T
ime
of c
onta
ct d
uri
ng
pH o
f th
e w
ash
liqu
id
pH o
f th
e (2
00 m
l)
for
pret
reat
men
t sh
akin
g (m
in)
prep
ared
(N
) al
um
ina
AI&
( n
) A
I&k
(s)
AI&
(P)
HN
O,
H&
Q
H,P
O,
HN
O,
H,S
O,
H,P
O;
HN
OB
H
,SO
, H
,PO
,
8.5
8.2
8.0
7.5
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.8
4.5
4.0
3.5
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
6.0
6.0
- 5.0
5.0
4.0
- - 8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
- 5.0
5.0
-
0.01
0 0.
025
- 50
50
-
- 0.
030
0.01
25
0.05
0.
10
50
50
- 50
2
0.01
5 0.
075
0.10
20
50
5
0.01
5 0.
075
0.20
50
10
0 8
0.17
5 0.
10
0.30
20
50
10
0.
175
0.10
0.
35
50
100
12
0.02
0 0.
050
0.40
50
50
15
0.
025
0.05
0 0.
50
50
100
18
0.04
0 -
- 50
-
- 0.
050
0.10
0.
20
50
50
5 0.
075
0.50
0.
80
50
100
18
0.10
2.
00
- 50
30
0 -
8.6
8.6
- -
8.4
- 8.
4 8.
2 8.
2 8.
0 7.
8 7.
4 7.
5 7.
3 6.
9 7.
2 6.
7 6.
4 6.
8 6.
2 5.
9 6.
0 5.
7 5.
4 5.
5 5.
2 4.
9 5.
2 -
- 5.
0 4.
7 4.
4 4.
5 4.
2 3.
9 4.
0 3.
7 -
“Hou
rs.
TA
BL
E 2
Su
rfac
e ar
ea, a
nio
n c
onte
nt
and
hyd
roxi
de i
on-e
xch
ange
cap
acit
y of
alu
min
a sa
mpl
es o
f va
riou
s pH
pH o
f th
e al
um
ina
Su
rfac
e ar
ea (
S k
5 m
* g
- ’ )
A
nio
n c
onte
nt
of t
he
sam
ple
(mg-
ion
g-
’ )
Ion
-exc
han
ge c
apac
ity
(meq
gg
’ )
AM
b(n)
~l
,O:~
(s)
AI&
(P)
403(
n)
Al&
(s)
40,
(P)
3.5
4.0
4.5
4.8
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
93
105
- 90
10
5 70
93
10
7 73
96
-
- 96
10
3 74
91
10
7 67
94
11
3 73
92
10
9 -
0.18
2 0.
161
0.09
5 0.
029
0.02
8 0.
019
0.01
3 0.
006
0.25
3 0.
251
0.82
1 0.
206
0.51
3 -
- 0.
193
0.33
3 0.
142
0.20
4 0.
103
0.12
1 0.
094
-
403
( n 1
&
On(
s)
AM
A (P
)
0.72
1.
73
- 0.
58
1.39
0.
93
0.50
1.
17
0.28
0.
44
- -
0.42
1.
04
0.16
0.
40
0.98
0.
07
0.37
0.
92
0.04
0.
30
0.75
-
376
and estimated. The solution left in the flask was again given the same treat- ment after 30 and 60 min.
3.RESULTS
3.1. Variation in adsorption with time
The variation in adsorption with time (10 min-72 h) and pH was examined at 30 5 lo C. The process was fast on A1203 (n). Thus, at pH 4.0 and with lo- min contact, quantitative adsorption occurred. However, the rate of adsorption appeared to decrease with increase in pH (4.0-8.0). The equilibrium was es- tablished in 2 h. The adsorption on A&O3 (s) and Al,O,( p) seemed to be a relatively slow process. The equilibrium period was attained after 6 h
[A12G3(s)l and24h [4&(~)1.
3.2. Variation of adsorption with temperature
Studies on the variation of adsorption with temperature ( 30-60 + 0.1 ‘C, 6 h) showed that with A&O3 (n) of pH 4.0-8.0, the process was almost athermic for NB and exothermic for LG. The isosteric heats of adsorption (Q) were calculated using the Claussius-Clapeyron equation,
RT,T, C, Q ( isosteric) = -p
T -T 1 2 % 2
For the same amount of dye adsorbed, concentrations ( C1, C,) , coresponding to different temperatures ( T1, T,) , were determined from the isotherms (not shown) and then computed to calculate Q. The Q values of LG were - 3 to - 9 kcal mol-‘. Exothermic nature of adsorption was also shown by the dyes on Al,O,( s) (pH 2.0-8.0, 6 h) and Al,O, (p) (pH 2.0-6.0, 6 h). The Q values werelow (-3to -24kcalmol-lforNBand-4to -1Okcalmoll’forLG).
3.3 Adsorption as a function of pH
Changes in the nature of adsorption with pH ( 30 -t 1 o C, 24 h) are illustrated in Figs l-6. It was observed that with A1203 (n) , the affinity of the dyes for the substrate increases gradually with decrease in pH. Quantitative adsorption oc- curred at pH < 4.0 (NB) and pH 6 3.5 (LG) , and it dropped to zero at pH 8.8 for NB, and was very low in the case of LG. The adsorption on A1203 (s) in- creased in the pH range 1.0-5.0 (NB) and 2.0-5.5 (LG) and then decreased in the pH range 5.5-8.8 (NB) and 6.0-8.8 (LG) . The maximum adsorption took place at pH 5.0 ( NB) and 5.5 (LG). For A1203 (p), the adsorption in- creased in the pH range 1.0-2.5 (NB) and 2.0-3.0 (LG) and then decreased with increase in pH and dropped to zero at pH 6.5 (NB ) and 7.0 (LG) . Max-
I I I I I I I I I IO 20 30 LO
-End concn ( moles/ litre) X lo5 50
Fig. 1. Change in the nature of adsorption of naphthol blue-black from aqueous solutions on HNO,- treated alumina of varying pH. (Time, 24 h; temperature, 30 + 1 “C.)
imum adsorption was thus observed at pH 2.5 (NB) and 3.0 (LG). It was
noted that at pH < 4.0 andpH > 8.0 for NB andpH 54.5 (LG), the adsorption was in the order: A1203 (n ) > A1203 ( s ) > A&O, ( p 1, which, however, changes to A1203 (s I> A&O, ( n ) > A1203 ( p ) at pH 4.5-7.5 ( NB) and pH > 5.0 for LG. The isotherms observed were of H, L and S type (Figs l-6 ) .
-End concn (moles/litre )X105
Fig. 2. Change in the nature of adsorption of lissamine green ‘BN’ from aqueous solutions on HNO,,-treated alumina of varying pH. (Time, 24 h; temperature, 30 ?I 1 “C.)
3.4. Adsorption as a function of pH in presence of electrolytes
Adsorption of the dyes in the presence of electrolytes ( NaNO,, Na2S04 and Na,PO,) ( 30 k lo, 24 h) was investigated using identical dye and electrolyte concentrations, i.e., 0.57 mmol 1-l. The data are shown in Table 3. Sorption was observed to decrease significantly, and the order of retarding influence was: PO;- > SO:- > NO,. The three types of alumina did not show any affin- ity for the solutes at pH > 5.0 ( NB ) and pH 3 5.0 ( LG ) [ A1203 ( n ) ] , pH Z 6.0 [Al,O,(s)] andpH >4.0 (NB) andpH 24.0 (LG) [A1203(p)],withNaaP04 present in the adsorption bath. In addition, it was observed that in the presence of the electrolytes, the optimum pH for adsorption remained the same.
3 E
60
t
pti=5,0
P
pH=L.0
I ,. pH=7.0
50
LO
30
20
IO
379
l End concn (moles/ litrel x lo5
Fig. 3. Change in the nature of adsorption of naphthol blue-black from aqueous solutions on H,SO,- treated alumina of varying pH. (Time, 24 h; temperature, 30 fr 1°C.)
3.5. Reversibility of adsorption
The dyes adsorbed on the substrates [ A&O3 (n ) and A&O3 ( s) of pH 2.0-8.0 andAl,O,(p) ofpH 1.0-5.0 (NB) and2.0-5.0 (LG)] at30-tl”C (24h) were selected for desorption studies. Aqueous solutions of NaN03, Na2S04 and Na,PO, of varying concentrations (0.1 to 1 x 10m4 M) were tested as desor-
PH =6.5
----+End concn (moles/litre)X IO5
Fig. 4. Change in the nature of adsorption of l&amine green ‘BN’ from aqueous solutions on H,SO,-treated alumina of varying pH. (Time, 24 h; temperature, 30 f 1 “C.)
bents. The observations (Table 4) reveal that the adsorption is quite reversi- ble. Desorption efficacy of the anions was in the order: PO:- > SOi- > NO,, and it increased with increasing concentration of the electrolytes. The extent of desorption was found to depend on pH of the substrate as well as the acid used for the pretreatment. Thus, desorption increased with increase in pH [ A&O3 ( n ) ] ( pH 2.0-8.0 1. However, with A1203 ( s ) and A&O3 ( p ) it decreased [ pH 2.0-5.0 for A&O,(s) and pH 1.0-2.5 ( NB ) and pH 2.0-3.0 ( LG) in the case of A1203 (p) 1. Desorption was found to increase at pH 5.0-8.0 for A&O3 (s) and pH > 2.5 (NB) and pH >3.0 (LG) in the case of A&,0,(p). Thus, de- sorption was minimum at pH 5.0 (NB and LG) and pH 2.5 (NB) and pH 3.0
381
,
I
-End concn (moles/litre I X 10'
Fig. 5. Change in the nature of adsorption of naphthol blue-black from aqueous solutions on H,PO,- treated alumina of varying pH. (Time, 24 h; temperature, 30 ? lo C. )
( LG ) for A1203 ( s ) and A&O3 ( p) , respectively. It was observed that degree of desorption was in the order: A1204 ( n) > A1203 ( s) > A1203 ( p ) .
4. DISCUSSION
4.1. pH and sorption
The apparent ion-exchange nature of alumina is due to amphoteric reactions of the hydroxyl groups, as shown below:
382
0 0 16 2L 32 LO
_ End wncn Imoles/lltrel X IO5
Fig. 6. Change in the nature of adsorption of lissamine green ‘BN’ from aqueous solutions on H,,PO,-treated alumina of varying pH. (Time, 24 h; temperature, 30 f 1 “C.)
TABLE 3
Percentage decrease in the adsorption of anionic dyes (naphthol blue-black and lissamine green ‘BN’) from aqueous solutions in the presence of electrolytes on acid-treated alumina samples of varying pH”
pH of Al,%(n) Al&(s) AM&(P) alumina
NaNO,, Na,SO, Na,PO, NaNO, Na$O, Na,PO, NaN03 Na2S0, Na,PO, ~~ -~ ~~~
NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG
2.0 3.7 3.0 9.4 31.6 23.0 59.2 1.1 7.3 7.7 30.5 48.3 71.4 1.7 26.7 10.0 48.1 54.7 74.0 3.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.6 27.3 9.7 55.6 50.1 87.9 4.0 15.5 7.1 33.3 43.8 49.0 95.7 0.9 15.4 16.4 54.9 68.6 71.4 44.2 75.0 73.1 91.6 93.4 NA 5.0 25.4 10.7 57.3 54.4 NA NA 0.7 11.2 12.3 27.3 NA NA 32.5 72.0 NA NA NA NA 6.0 21.0 10.7 60.7 67.5 NA NA 0.6 10.6 14.0 32.1 NA NA - - - - - - 7.0 11.1 13.9 56.8 61.4 NA NA NA 8.1 25.9 38.7 NA NA - - - - - - 8.0 3.1 6.8 58.1 58.1 NA NA 0.9 14.5 39.4 54.5 NA NA - - - - - -
“Temperature, 30f 1°C; time, 24 h; [dye],=057 mmol l-l, [electrolyte],=0.57 mmol 1-l; NA, no adsorption.
383
TABLE 4
Percentage desorption of anionic dyes (naphthol blue-black and lissamine green ‘BN’) adsorbed on different acid-treated alumina samples by electrolytes (0.1 M)”
pH of AlzGr Cd ALO, ( 8) Al&:,(p) alumina
NaNOzI Na,SO, Na:*PO,b NaNO, Na,SO, Na,PO, NaNO,, Na,SO, Na,PG, ------
NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG NB LG
2.0 6.6 5.2 QD QD QD QD 30.4 32.5 QD 86.3 QD 87.6 - 85.8 - QD - QD 2.5 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 24.3 74.3 36.7 QD QD QD 4.0 12.5 10.0 QD QD QD QD 10.3 21.9 95.2 76.0 QD 80.7 37.2 80.1 71.6 QD QD QD 5.0 25.0 28.1 QD QD QD QD 6.2 5.8 93.0 67.8 QD 75.7 75.8 86.9 QD QD QD QD 6.0 38.2 31.1 QD QD QD QD 7.9 5.3 94.1 61.9 QD 70.8 - QD - QD - QD 7.0 52.1 39.1 QD QD QD QD 8.7 12.8 96.2 72.9 QD 86.7 - - - - - - 8.0 54.0 42.9 QD QD QD QD 17.4 18.2 QD 86.7 QD 88.9 - - - - - -
“Temperature: 30+ 1°C; [dye],=0.57 mmol I-‘; QD, quantitative desorption. “0.01 M.
>Al -OH - >Al+ + OH-
+% >AIO- + H+
(onion exchange)
(cation exchange)
Pretreatment of the substrate with an acid ( H+X- ) may cover the surface with the acid anions, and these anions may bind to the surface in different ways, depending upon the nature of anions.
>A1 - X + H,O
The network of the oxide may react or coordinate with H+ ions of the acid ( HN03, H&SO,, H,PO,) incorporating the diffusible anions (NO,, SOi- or PO:- ) . Thus, anion-exchange behaviour is imparted to the surface when the concentration of the acid increases, the surface acquires increasing positive charge, and so more diffusible anions enter. This is shown by an increase in the amount of the anions on the pretreated samples (Table 2). Thus, sorption of anionic species is likely to be enhanced with decrease in pH of the substrate surface.
The ion-exchange nature of adsorption is also indicated by the fast adsorp- tion, low values of isosteric heat of adsorption, retardation of sorption in the presence of electrolytes and the desorption characteristics.
However, a mechanism involving the formation of covalent bonds, especially at lower pH values, cannot be ruled out. This is indicated by the small effect of the electrolytes on the degree of sorption at lower surface pH values. In
384
addition, specifically adsorbed ions (X- ) may modify the adsorption behav- iour quite significantly.
4.2. Structural characteristics and adsorption
When the structural characteristics of the dyes are considered, a few impor- tant indications can be made regarding their adsorption behaviour. The gen- eral rules defined by Roosens [ 131 and Cummings et al. [ 141 may be of help in interpreting the observations. OG is a monosulphonate mono-azo dye, while NB belongs to the disulphonate-diazo group of dyes. LG has also a disulphon- ate group but lacks the azo group. The coverage factor [ 151 of the dyes, as calculated from the relationship, C.F. = 1.2 x 10m7 (ionic wt) 2.g3, was 2.8, 13.0 and 14.3 for OG, LG and NB, respectively. So, NB anions have greater affinity as compared to the other two dyes, which is reflected in terms of their Kd val- ues. Distribution coefficients (I&) for adsorption were calculated using the relation:
K =Amount of the solute on solid Amount of the solute in solution d Weight of solid I Volume of solution
The Kd was determined by batch experiment. A few Kd values utilised for chro- matographic separations are shown in Table 5.
In the pH range 4.0-7.0, NB showed a greater affinity for the substrates in comparison to LG and OG. The lesser affinity of LG as compared to NB and OG (pH 6 7.0) may be due to the absence of an azo group in its molecule [ 131, and also its relatively weaker acidic character, while its greater affinity in the alkaline pH range may be ascribed to its weak amphoteric character.
4.3. Aggregation of dyes
Anionic dyes are known to aggregate in the form of charged micelles, when adsorbed on alumina [ 161. The concentration of the dyes needed to obtain a close-packed monolayer (Am) can be computed in two ways: (i) using the formula [ 171:
S=AmXiVXaX 10v2’
where S is the surface area of the solid, N is Avogardro’s number, a is the projection area of the dye and the value determined is denoted by (Am) s; (ii) from the linear plots of l/ (B -x) versus m/x, as suggested by Mathews [ 181, where B is the number of moles of solute present in a volume V (ml) which have been equilibrated with m (g) of the adsorbent and x moles are adsorbed (leaving behind B-x moles in the same volume V) . The latter is denoted by (Am) L. This evaluation gives us an idea of the most probable monolayer ca-
TABLE 5
Separation of anionic dyes (orange II, naphthol blue-black and lissamine green ‘BN’) on acid- treated ahmina”
Sepn Constituents pH of Kd values Dye Eluent used Percent- No of mixture alumina eluted (Concn. (M) and age
and its Adsorption Desorption volume (ml)) recovery height x 102 x 10-2
(cm) (ml g-‘) (g ml-‘)
Nitric acid-treated alumina 1 OG pH 5.5 1.24
NB 12 and (20x1 2.18
cm LG column) 11.36
2 OG pH 6.0, 1.02 and 6 NB 7.93
3 OG pH 7.0 0.26 and 7 LG 0.71
4 LG pH 5.0 2.57 and 7 NB 21.19
Sulphuric acid-treated alumina 5 OG pH 5.0 6.70
and 7 NB QA’
6 OG pH 6.0 4.55 and 8 LG 7.76
7 LG pH 4.0, 1.97 and 9 NB 33.64
17.52b 13.29’ 0.56b 4.65 0.28b 2.73
OG NaNO, (0.1,50) 99.7
LG Na,PO, (0.001,25) 99.5
NB Na,PO, (0.01,30) 99.4
OG NaNO, (0.1,50) 99.7
0.50
QD”
0.26 0.41
NB Na2S0, (0.1,30) 99.5 OG NaNO, (0.1,50) 99.8
LG Na,PO, (0.1,30) 99.6
LG NaN03 (0.1,50) 99.6
0.26 NB Na2S0, (0.1,30) 99.5
0.68 OG Na,PO, (0.001,50) 99.6
0.27 NB Na,PO, (0.01,25) 99.6
4.41 OG Na,PO, (0.001,45) 99.6
0.79 LG Na,PO, (0.01,25) 99.7
2.29 LG Na,SO, (0.01,50) 99.4
0.48 NB Na,PO, (0.01,35) 99.6
“Column, quick fit glass column (10 X 1 cm) ; mixture for separation, 5.0 ml aqueous solution of each dye ( 0.23 mm01 1-l ) ; time of contact before elution 1 h [ A1203 ( n ) ] and 2 h [ Al,O, (s ) ] . bValues are for the first eluent used in the separation. ‘Values are for the second eluent used in the separation. dQuantitative desorption. *Quantitative adsorption.
pacity (Am). (x/m),, is the maximum amount of the dye adsorbed. The linear plots and the (x/m) mBIL values were obtained through equilibrium ad- sorption studies conducted in the concentration range 2.28-0.57 mmol 1-l. One of the representative figures of the linear plots is shown in Fig. 7.
1.0
1.6
0.2
0
Q pH.C.8
0 pH.5.0
. pH=6.0
. pH:
I.6
1.2
0.0
04
0 0
P m/x (gram/ mole 1 x IO3
Fig. 7. Linear plots of l/(B-z) versus m/x in liquid-solid system. (L&amine green ‘BN’ on HNO,,-treated alumina.)
In Table 6, the monolayer capacity (Am) L, and (Am) s are reported along with (x/m ) max values. Upon analysis of the results it is seen that:
(a) In the concentration range studied, (x/m) max values are generally close to the limiting (Am), values.
(b ) In case of A1203 (n) (OG and NB, pH z 4.5; LG, pH > 6.0)) the actual amount of the dyes adsorbed and the (Am) L values were lower than the (Am ) s values, indicating adsorption of single dye anions. The same behaviour was observed for A1203 (s) (OG and NB, pH > 5.5) and A1203 (p) (OG and NB, pH a3.5).
(c) With A1203 (s) the (x/m) max and (Am) L values were much higher than the calculated (Am) s values, indicating aggregation of the anionic dyes, during their adsorption. The aggregation of dye anions in the form of charged micelles
TA
BL
E 6
Com
puta
tion
dat
a of
Am
(m
onol
ayer
cap
acit
y)
of a
nio
nic
dye
s (n
aph
thol
blu
e bl
ack
an
d &
amin
e gr
een
‘BN
’) on
aci
d-tr
eate
d al
um
ina
sam
ples
of
var
iou
s pH
”
pH o
f H
NO
, H
P%
H
,PO
, al
um
ina
wm
kn
,x
(Am
)nb
(Am
I sc
(x
/~Jr
n,x
(Am
), (A
mJs
( x
/mJ
max
(A
mJL
(A
mJs
NB
L
G
NB
L
G
NB
L
G
NB
L
G
NB
L
G
NB
L
G
NB
L
G
NB
L
G
NB
L
G
2.5
154.
60
44.0
9 27
7.18
52
.82
57.1
4 66
.52
3.0
81.5
3 50
.31
96.1
5 58
.82
52.7
4 46
.52
3.5
38.3
5 41
.15
48.5
4 47
.62
52.7
4 46
.52
4.0
82.0
0 85
.46
84.0
3 88
.50
67.8
1 59
.81
110.
54
77.6
9 12
1.65
10
2.04
78
.35
69.0
8 24
.13
23.1
7 26
.32
27.1
8 52
.74
46.5
6 4.
5 60
.90
72.2
1 64
.10
78.1
3 67
.81
59.8
1 11
1.12
-
125.
00
- 78
.35
_ _
_ _
_ _
_
4.8
40.4
3 57
.61
43.4
8 66
.67
70.0
7 61
.80
- -
- -
- -
12.0
6 18
.13
12.6
6 19
.61
55.7
5 49
.17
5.0
37.7
8 52
.42
40.0
0 62
.50
70.0
7 61
.80
113.
03
95.3
4 12
3.46
10
7.53
77
.60
68.4
4 5.
5 -
- -
- -
- 96
.86
105.
79
104.
87
125.
00
87.3
9 77
.08
6.0
31.1
2 46
.98
34.4
8 51
.28
68.5
6 60
.47
- 10
0.56
-
116.
28
- 71
.10
6.5
_ -
_ _
- _
65.2
6 87
.67
67.5
7 11
1.11
80
.61
71.1
0 7.
0 20
.00
36.8
1 23
.26
44.4
4 70
.82
62.4
6 45
.20
86.0
5 51
.28
105.
26
85.1
3 75
.09
“All
val
ues
are
in m
oles
per
gra
m t
imes
106
. b(
Am
JL v
alu
es c
ompu
ted
from
lin
ear
plot
s co
nn
ecti
ng
l/(B
-x
) an
d m
/x.
‘(A
mJs
va
lues
com
pute
d fr
om s
urf
ace
area
val
ues
of
the
sam
ples
.
- -I
.- -
- .
,,,
-- .
_ .
388
is also possible for the dyes on A1203( n) (OG and NB, pH ~4.0, LG, pH < 5.0). The dyes also show higher adsorption than that indicated by the (Am) s values on A1203 (p) (OG and NB, pH d 3.0; LG, pH < 3.5).
(d) In the pH range 4.0-5.0, the adsorption on A1203 ( n) may be micellar in nature and (Am) L values were in the order: NB < LG < OG, which is the in- verse order of basicity.
(e) However, in the pH range 4.0-5.0 [ A1,03 (s) ] and 3.0-4.0 [A&O,(p) 1, the adsorption appears to be monodispersed and (Am) L values follow the or- der LG < NB < OG, which is the inverse order for cross-sectional area. The values for cross-sectional area determined for flat-orientation of the dye ions were 120,220.5 and 250 A” for OG, NB and LG, respectively.
5. CONCLUSION
The results of this investigation provide ample evidence that the ion-ex- change capacity of alumina can be suitably promoted by its treatment with acids, e.g., HN03 and H,SO,. The acid treatment, and hence the adsorption of specific anions (NO,, SO:-, PO:- ) , lowers the isoelectric point, and thus, modifies the electrokinetic behaviour of the sorbent. In addition, displacement of the OH- ions from the surface by the anions may increase anion-exchange capacity; depending on the relative position of the anions in the ion-selectivity series, i.e., OH- > PO!- > SO:- > NO;. Thus, NO; ion can be easily ex- changed by adsorbing dye anions. The H,SO, treatment appears to affect the substrate surface in a different manner. The pretreatment may lower the iso- electric point of alumina from 8.0 to pH N 5.0, as indicated by maximum ad- sorption at pH 5.0. As SOi- ions have greater affinity for the surface, they may influence the process quite considerably at pH > 5.0 (probably through a competitive effect) : At pH < 3.0, the competition between undissociated acid molecules and the product of the reaction between the dye and acid plays a prominent part, and this decreases adsorption of the solutes [ 191.
The maximum affinity of the solutes for A1203 (p ) at about pH 3.0 may be due to lowering of the isoelectric point (by as much as 5 pH units). The higher affinity of PO:- ions for surface may lower affinity of the solutes. Thus, as compared to HNO, treatment, more sites involved in specific interactions seem to be created by H,SO, and H3P04 treatment of alumina with the latter being more effective.
These findings also have practical importance, as a greater proportion of the solutes is desorbed in the presence of other inorganic ions of higher basicity. Thus, synthetic mixtures of these dyes (binary and ternary) in aqueous solu- tions were separated by column chromatography on alumina of varying pH. The experimental conditions are summarised in Table 5. The difference in the values of Kd was the basis for such separations. K,, (distribution coefficient for desorption) values were calculated according to the relation:
389
K = Amount of solute in solution Amount of solute in the solid D Volume of the solution I Weight of solid
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are thankful to Dr S.G. Tandon, Professor and Head of the Department and Dr S.S. Dave, Director, Geology and Mining, M.P., for the encouragement and provision of facilities.
REFERENCES
1
2 3
4 5 6
7
8 9
10 11 12 13 14
15 16
L.R. Snyder, Principles of Adsorption Chromatography, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1968, p. 165. G.L. Mundhara and J.S. Tiwari, J. Indian Chem. Sot., 55 (1978) 1082. M.P. Tiwari, J.S. Tiwari and G.L. Mundhara, J. Indian Chem. Sot., 56 (1979) 798; 57 (1980) 306; 57 (1980) 404. C.H. Giles and D.V. Datye, Trans. Inst. Met. Finish., 40 (1963), 113; 57 (1979) 48. G.L. Mundhara and J.S. Tiwari, J. Indian Chem. Sot., 56 (1979) 737. S. Moitra, G.L. Mundhara, J.S. Tiwari and R.K. Mishra, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 87 (1984) 582. S. Moitra, G.L. Mundhara, J.S. Tiwari and R.K. Mishra, J. Indian Chem. Sot., 61 (1984) 582. M.A. Anderson and D.T. Malotky, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 72 (1979) 413. M.J. Fuller, Chromatogr. Rev., 14 (1971) 45. K. Jiratova and L. Beranek, Appl. Catal., 2 (1982) 125. G. Singh and D.A. Clifford, Chem. Abstr., 95 (1981) 210300 k. V.K. Jain, G.L. Mundhara, R.K. Mishra and J.S. Tiwari, Surf. Technol., 26 (1985) 295. L. Roosens, Ind. Chim. Belge., 17 (1952) 211. T. Cummings, H.C. Garven, C.H. Giles, S.M.K. Rahman, J.G. Sneedon and C.E. Stewart, J. Chem. Sot., (1959) 535. C.H. Giles, A.P. D’Silva and A.S. Trivedi, J. Appl. Chem., 20 (1970) 37. C.H. Giles, E.A. Easton, R.B. McKay and C.C. Patel, N.B. Shah and D.E. Smith, Trans. Faraday Sot., 62 (1966) 1963.
17 C.H. Giles, H.V. Mehta, C.E. Stewart and S.M.K. Rahman, J. Appl. Chem., 9 (1959) 457. 18 C.A. Mathews, M.Sc. Thesis, Bombay Univ., 1980. 19 G. Bordman and W.E. Worral, Trans. Br. Ceram. Sot., 65 (1966) 343.