solutions · 2014-01-14 · gure : the diameter fqlies along the line pi, while the secant snalso...

17
36/ SOLUTIONS SOLUTIONS No problem is ever permanently closed. The editor is always pleased to consi- der for publication new solutions or new insights on past problems. 1464. [1989 : 207 ; 1990 : 282-284] Proposed by George Tsintsifas, Thessaloniki, Greece. Let A 0 B 0 C 0 be a triangle inscribed in a triangle ABC, so that A 0 BC, B 0 CA, C 0 AB. (a)? Prove that BA 0 A 0 C = CB 0 B 0 A = AC 0 C 0 A (1) if and only if the centroids G, G 0 of the two triangles coincide. (b)? Prove that if (1) holds, and either the circumcenters O,O 0 or the orthocenters H, H 0 of the triangles coincide, then ΔABC is equilateral. (c)? If (1) holds and the incenters I,I 0 of the triangles coincide, characterize ΔABC . Solution by C.R. Pranesachar, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. (c)? We will show that, as in part (b), (1) together with I = I 0 imply that ΔABC (as well as ΔA 0 B 0 C 0 ) must be equilateral. Let BA 0 A 0 C = CB 0 B 0 A = AC 0 C 0 A = w be the common ratio into which the sides are divided by A 0 ,B 0 , and C 0 . Let, further, BC = a,CA = b, AB = c, area [ABC]= F , semiperimeter of triangle ABC = s, its inradius = r, and inradius of triangle A 0 B 0 C 0 = ρ. A B C A 0 B 0 C 0 I r ρ Crux Mathematicorum, Vol. 39(1), January 2013

Upload: others

Post on 31-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

36/ SOLUTIONS

SOLUTIONS

No problem is ever permanently closed. The editor is always pleased to consi-der for publication new solutions or new insights on past problems.

1464. [1989 : 207 ; 1990 : 282-284] Proposed by George Tsintsifas, Thessaloniki,Greece.

Let A′B′C ′ be a triangle inscribed in a triangle ABC, so that A′ ∈ BC, B′ ∈CA, C ′ ∈ AB.

(a)? Prove that

BA′

A′C=CB′

B′A=AC ′

C ′A(1)

if and only if the centroids G,G′ of the two triangles coincide.

(b)? Prove that if (1) holds, and either the circumcenters O,O′ or the orthocentersH,H ′ of the triangles coincide, then ∆ABC is equilateral.

(c)? If (1) holds and the incenters I, I ′ of the triangles coincide, characterize∆ABC.

Solution by C.R. Pranesachar, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.

(c)? We will show that, as in part (b), (1) together with I = I ′ imply that ∆ABC(as well as ∆A′B′C ′) must be equilateral. Let

BA′

A′C=CB′

B′A=AC ′

C ′A= w

be the common ratio into which the sides are divided by A′, B′, and C ′. Let,further, BC = a,CA = b, AB = c, area [ABC] = F , semiperimeter of triangleABC = s, its inradius = r, and inradius of triangle A′B′C ′ = ρ.

A

B CA′

B′

C′I

r

ρ

Crux Mathematicorum, Vol. 39(1), January 2013

SOLUTIONS / 37

By the Cosine formula we have

A′B′2

= A′C2 + CB′2

− 2 ·A′C · CB′ · cosC

=a2

(1 + w)2+

b2w2

(1 + w)2− 2abw

(1 + w)2· (a2 + b2 − c2)

2ab

=1

(1 + w)2

�b2(w2 − w) + c2w + a2(1− w)

�.

Also

[IA′CB′] = [IA′C] + [ICB′] =1

2r ·A′C +

1

2r · CB′

=1

2· Fs· (a+ bw)

(1 + w)=

(a+ bw)F

(a+ b+ c)(1 + w);

and

[B′A′C] =1

2·A′C · CB′ · sinC =

1

2

abw

(1 + w)2· 2F

ab=

wF

(1 + w)2.

Hence

[IA′B′] = [IA′CB′]− [B′A′C]

=(a+ bw)F

(a+ b+ c)(1 + w)− wF

(1 + w)2=

F

(1 + w)2· (bw2 − cw + a)

(a+ b+ c).

Now the inradius ρ of triangle A′B′C ′ is given by

ρ = 2 · [IA′B′]

A′B′;

so

ρ2 = 4 · [IA′B′]2

A′B′2=

4F 2

(1 + w)2(a+ b+ c)2· (bw2 − cw + a)2

(b2(w2 − w) + c2w + a2(1− w)).

We have two further expressions for ρ2 obtained by cyclically permuting a, b, c inthe last expression. Canceling the common factor 4F 2/((1 + w)2(a+ b+ c)2), wehave

(aw2 − bw + c)2

(a2(w2 − w) + b2w + c2(1− w))=

(bw2 − cw + a)2

(b2(w2 − w) + c2w + a2(1− w))

=(cw2 − aw + b)2

(c2(w2 − w) + a2w + b2(1− w)).

From the equality of the second and third quotients we get (after cross-multiplying and removing the nonzero factor w(w2 − w + 1)(a+ b+ c)),

(b3 + c3 − b2c+ bc2 − ab2 − ac2)w2 − 2ca(c− a)w

− (a3 + b3 + a2b− ab2 − a2c− b2c) = 0. (2)

Copyright c© Canadian Mathematical Society, 2014

38/ SOLUTIONS

Similarly from the equality of the first and third quotients we get

(c3 + a3 − c2a+ ca2 − bc2 − ba2)w2 − 2ab(a− b)w− (b3 + c3 + b2c− bc2 − b2a− c2a) = 0. (3)

We know that if two quadratic equations P1t2 + Q1t + R1 = 0 and

P2t2 +Q2t+R2 = 0 have a common root then

(R1P2 −R2P1)2 = (Q1R2 −Q2R1)(P1Q2 − P2Q1).

Thus, eliminating w from the quadratic equations (2) and (3), we get on factoring

(a+ b+ c)(a2 + b2 + c2 − bc− ca− ab)× (a3 + b3 + c3 + abc)(a3 + b3 + c3 − 2ab2 − 2ac2 + abc)2 = 0.

Since the first and third factors on the left are positive, one of the remaining factorsmust be zero. From the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality applied to the vectors (a, b, c)and (b, c, a), we know that a2 +b2 +c2−bc−ca−ab = 0 implies a = b = c. Finally,if a3 +b3 +c3−2ab2−2ac2 +abc = 0, we observe that had we chosen other pairs ofequations in the previous argument we would have cyclically permuted the rolesof a, b, c in equations (2) and (3), resulting in a3 + b3 + c3 − 2bc2 − 2ba2 + abc = 0and a3 + b3 + c3 − 2ca2 − 2cb2 + abc = 0. From these three equations we deducethat

a(b2 + c2) = b(c2 + a2) = c(a2 + b2),

from which we again conclude that a = b = c.

No other solutions have been received.Pranesachar used MAPLE for his computations, but the results can be verified easily en-

ough by hand. He remarked that because his calculations used squares of distances, his argumentshows further that I could not even be an excentre of triangle A′B′C′. He went on to prove thateven if the ratio w were allowed to be negative (in which case A′, B′, and C′ lie outside triangleABC), the incentres of the two triangles would coincide only if the triangles were equilateral.Because the proof of this claim is similar to the above solution, we will not reproduce it here.This result is in contrast with Problem 1492(b) [1999 : 508-510], where he with his coauthor B.V.Venkatachala showed that there exist nonequilateral triangles for which the incentre of ∆ABCcoincides with an excentre of ∆A′B′C′ when condition (1) is replaced by the requirement thatAA′ = BB′ = CC′.

3701. [2012 : 23, 25] Proposed by R. F. Stockli, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Let S be the set of all real continuous functions f defined on the closedinterval [0, 1] with f(0) = f(1) = 0. Find all numbers 0 < r < 1 such that forevery f belonging to S there exists c = c(f) and d = d(f) belonging to [0, 1] suchthat d− c = r and f(c) = f(d).

I. Solution by George Apostolopoulos, Messolonghi, Greece.

The values of r are reciprocals of positive integers exceeding 1.For integers n ≥ 2, let f(x) satisfy the conditions of the problem and let

g(x) = f

�x+

1

n

�− f(x)

Crux Mathematicorum, Vol. 39(1), January 2013

SOLUTIONS / 39

for 0 ≤ x ≤ (n−1)/n. Suppose that g(x) never vanishes. Then g(x) must be eitheralways positive or always negative. But then

0 <n−1Xi=0

����g�i

m

����� =n−1Xi=0

����f�i+ 1

n

�− f

�i

n

�����=

�����n−1Xi=0

f

�i+ 1

n

�− f

�i

n

������ = |f(1)− f(0)| = 0,

a contradiction. Therefore f(x+1/n) = f(x) for some x ∈ [0, 1−1/n] and r = 1/nsatisfies the condition of the problem.

However, we give a counterexample for any other value of r ∈ (0, 1). Supposethat k = 1− rb1/rc. Since 0 < 1/r − b1/rc < 1, it follows that

0 < k = 1− rb1/rc < r.

Define f(0) = 0, f(k) = −b1/rc and f(r) = 1. Extend f linearly to the intervals[0, k] and [k, r]. For 0 ≤ x ≤ 1− r, let f(x+ r) = f(x) + 1. It is clear that f(x+ r)never equals f(x). In addition,

f(1) = f

�k +

�1

r

�r

�= f(k) +

�1

r

�= 0.

II. Solution by AN-anduud Problem Solving Group, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.

First let r = 1/n for a positive integer n exceeding 1. Define g(x) as inthe foregoing solution. Then for f(x) satisfying the conditions of the problem,g(0) + g(1/n) + g(2/n) + · · ·+ g((n− 1)/n) = f(1)− f(0) = 0. Hence either all ofthe g(i/n) must vanish, or there are indices i < j for which g(i/n) and g(j/n) haveopposite signs. In the latter case, since f(x) is continuous, there exists c ∈ [i/n, j/n]for which f(c+ 1/n)− f(c) = 0.

On the other hand, let r ∈ (0, 1) not be the reciprocal of an integer. For0 ≤ x ≤ 1, define

f(x) =�

sinπx

r

�2− x

�sin

π

r

�2.

Then f(x) is continuous, f(1) = f(0) = 0 and

f(x+ r) =

�sin

π(x+ r)

r

�2

− (x+ r)�

sinπ

r

�2=�

sin�πxr

+ π��2− (x+ r)

�sin

π

r

�2=�

sin�πxr

��2− x

�sin

π

r

�2− r

�sin

π

r

�2= f(x)− r

�sin

π

r

�2.

Since sin(π/r) 6= 0, f(x+ r) 6= f(x) for all x ∈ [0, 1− r].

Copyright c© Canadian Mathematical Society, 2014

40/ SOLUTIONS

Also solved by ROY BARBARA, Lebanese University, Fanar, Lebanon ; MICHEL BA-TAILLE, Rouen, France ; OLIVER GEUPEL, Bruhl, NRW, Germany ; and the proposer. Geu-pel provided a piecewise linear example for the case 1/r not an integer. Bataille gave the sameexample as in the second solution. There was one incorrect solution.

3702. [2012 : 23, 25] Proposed by Nguyen Thanh Binh, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Let the incircle (with centre I) of triangle ABC touch the sides BC at D,CA at E, and AB at F . Define M and P to be the points where BC intersectsthe lines IE and IF , N and Q to be the second intersections of the incircle withIE and IF , and R and S to be the second intersections of the incircle with MQand PN . If H and K are the points where NQ intersects ER and FS, prove that∠KDH = ∠BAC.

I. Solution by the proposer.

We will prove that DK is perpendicular to IF . Since IF is, by definition, alsoperpendicular to AB, we will be able to deduce that KD||BA. A similar argumentwill give us DH||AC, so that the angles KDH and BAC have corresponding sidesparallel and are therefore equal as claimed.

Consider the portion of the given configuration shown in the accompanyingfigure : the diameter FQ lies along the line PI, while the secant SN also passesthrough P . The line PD is tangent at D to the circle with centre I, and thechords SF and QN intersect at K. Define the further points T = QS ∩NF andU = TK ∩QF . We are to prove that TK is perpendicular to QF at U and passesthrough D.

D

FI

K

N

P Q

S

T

U

Note that because QF is a diameter of a circle through S and N , K is theorthocentre of triangle QFT ; it follows that TK defines the third altitude, whenceTU ⊥ QF . It remains to show that D lies on TK. To that end we note that thequadrilateral SQUK (with right angles at S and U) is cyclic, so that ∠SQK =∠SUK. Similarly, the cyclic quadrilateral FNKU gives us ∠KFN = ∠KUN . We

Crux Mathematicorum, Vol. 39(1), January 2013

SOLUTIONS / 41

have, therefore,

∠SUN = ∠SUK + ∠KUN = ∠SQK + ∠KFN

= ∠SQN + ∠SFN = 2∠SQN = ∠SIN.

Thus, SUIN is a cyclic quadrilateral and, therefore, PS · PN = PU · PI.But PD2 = PS · PN , whence PD2 = PU · PI. Since PDI is a right-angledtriangle, we deduce that DU is perpendicular to PI. In other words, D lies on theperpendicular to PI through U , as do T and K. We conclude that the lines DKand PI(= IF ) are perpendicular, as desired. A similar argument using M in placeof P finishes the proof.

II. Composite of solutions by Vaclav Konecny, Big Rapids, MI, USA ; and by PeterY. Woo, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, USA.

Starting with the cyclic quadrilateral FQSN whose side FQ is the diameterof the incircle Γ, point K is the intersection of its diagonals while the externalpoint P is the intersection of two of its sides. The tangent to Γ from P touchesit at D and, therefore, DK is the polar of P ; furthermore, the point where DKmeets Γ again, call it D′, must be the point where the second tangent from Ptouches Γ. Consequently, PI is the perpendicular bisector of DD′ and, since Fis also on this line, we conclude that DK ⊥ IF . But IF ⊥ BA, so KD||BA.Similarly, H lies on the polar of M and therefore DH ⊥ IE, or DH||AC. Thus,∠KDH = ∠BAC, as desired.

Also solved by MICHEL BATAILLE, Rouen, France ; OLIVER GEUPEL, Bruhl, NRW,Germany ; and EDMUND SWYLAN, Riga, Latvia.

The projective theorem used in solution II applies to any cyclic quadrilateral FQSN ,whether or not one of its sides is a diameter. Specifically, if FQSN is a convex quadrilateralinscribed in a circle with centre I, and the points K,P , and D are related to the quadrilateralas in the problem, then DK ⊥ PI. As far as this editor can see, none of the submitted solutionscould be easily modified to provide an elementary Euclidean proof of this more general result.

3703. [2012 : 24, 26] Proposed by Panagiote Ligouras, Leonardo da Vinci HighSchool, Noci, Italy.

Let a, b, and c be the sides, and r the inradius of a triangle ABC. Provethat

a 3√abc

bc(a2 + bc)+

b 3√abc

ac(b2 + ca)+

c 3√abc

ab(c2 + ab)≤ 1

8r2.

Solution by John G. Heuver, Grande Prairie, AB.

Let H denote the summation on the left side of the given inequality. Then

H =3√abc

abc

�a2

a2 + bc+

b2

b2 + ca+

c2

c2 + ab

�. (1)

In the solution to Crux problem 3374 [2009 : 414–415] Peter Y. Woo proved that

a2

a2 + bc+

b2

b2 + ca+

c2

c2 + ab≤ a+ b+ c

2 3√abc

. (2)

Copyright c© Canadian Mathematical Society, 2014

42/ SOLUTIONS

Let s and R denote the semi-perimeter and circumradius of triangle ABC, respec-tively. It is well known that abc = 4rsR which, when combined with (1) and (2)then yields

H ≤ a+ b+ c

2abc=

2s

8rsR=

1

4rR≤ 1

8r2

since 2r ≤ R by Euler’s Inequality.

Also solved by SEFKET ARSLANAGIC, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia andHerzegovina(two solutions) ; RADOUAN BOUKHARFANE, Polytechnique de Montreal, PQ ;

KEE-WAI LAU, Hong Kong, China ; SALEM MALIKIC, student, Simon Fraser University,Burnaby, BC(two solutions) ; PAOLO PERFETTI, Dipartimento di Matematica, Universitadegli studi di Tor Vergata Roma, Rome, Italy ; EDMUND SWYLAN, Riga, Latvia ; and theproposer. There was also one incomplete solution.

3704. [2012 : 24, 26] Proposed by Richard McIntosh, University of Regina,Regina, SK.

Let p ≡ 1 (mod 3) be a prime and let n be an integer satisfying n2+n+1 ≡ 0(mod p). Prove that (n+ 1)p ≡ np + 1

�mod p3

�.

Composite of similar solution by George Apostolopoulos, Messolonghi, Greece ; andMichel Bataille, Rouen, France.

Let Z[x] denote the ring of all polynomials in x with integer coefficients.Since p | n2 + n+ 1 implies p2 | (n2 + n+ 1)2, it suffices to prove that

p(x2 + x+ 1)2 | (x+ 1)p − xp − 1

in Z[x].Let f(x) = x2 + x + 1 and g(x) = (x + 1)p − xp − 1. Since p |

�pk

�for all

k = 1, 2, . . . , p − 1 and g(x) =Pp−1k=1

�pk

�xp−k, clearly p | g(x). It now suffices

to show that the two complex roots, ω and ω, of f(x), where ω = −1+√3i

2 , aremultiple roots of g(x).

Since ω2 + ω + 1 = 0, ω3 = 1 and p ≡ 1 (mod 3) we have ωp = ω. Hence,

g(ω) = (ω + 1)p − ωp − 1 = (−ω2)p − ωp − 1 = −ω2 − ω − 1 = 0 .

Furthermore, g′(x) = p(x+ 1)p−1 − pxp−1 so

g′(ω) = p((ω + 1)p−1 − ωp−1) = p((−ω2)p−1 − ωp−1) = p(1− 1) = 0 .

Therefore, both ω and ω are multiple roots of g(x) ; that is, (f(x))2 | g(x)and our proof is complete.

Also solved by ROY BARBARA, Lebanese University, Fanar, Lebanon ; BRIAND. BEASLEY, Presbyterian College, Clinton, SC, USA ; JOHN HAWKINS and DAVIDR. STONE, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA ; JOEL SCHLOSBERG, Bay-side, NY, USA ; ALBERT STADLER, Herrliberg, Switzerland ; and the proposer. There wasalso a partially incorrect solution which claims that the condition p ≡ 1 (mod 3) follows fromthe other given condition. The example n = 1 and p = 3 shows that the claim is false. Ho-wever, it is interesting to note that using Fermat’s little theorem one can easily show that if(n+ 1)p ≡ np + 1 (mod p) then p ≡ 1 (mod 3) or p = 3.

Crux Mathematicorum, Vol. 39(1), January 2013

SOLUTIONS / 43

3705. [2012 : 24, 26] Proposed by Michel Bataille, Rouen, France.

Let ABC be a scalene triangle and G its centre of gravity. Let theperpendicular to BC through G meet the internal bisector of ∠BAC at A′.

(a) Show that G and the orthogonal projections of A′ onto the lines AB andAC are collinear.

(b) If B′ and C ′ are defined similarly to A′, prove that

GA′ ·GB′

CA · CB+GB′ ·GC ′

AB ·AC+GC ′ ·GA′

BC ·BA=

1

9.

Similar solutions by AN-anduud Problem Solving Group, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia ;and by Peter Y. Woo, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, USA.

(a) Define A2 to be the point where AA′ again intersects the circumcircle of triangleABC. Denote the midpoint of side BC by A1, and note that A1A2 ⊥ BC. BecauseGA′ has been defined to be perpendicular to BC, we have A1A2||GA′, whencetriangles AA′G and AA2A1 are homothetic with ratio of magnitude 2

3 . If A1, B1, C1

are the feet of perpendiculars dropped from A2 to BC,CA,AB, then these pointslie on a line, namely the Simson line of A2 with respect to ∆ABC. If D and E arethe orthogonal projections of A′ onto the lines AC and AB, then the dilatationwith centre A and ratio 2

3 that shrinks ∆AA2A1 to ∆AA′G takes B1 to D and C1

to E ; consequently, D,E,G are collinear.

(b) From the right triangle BA2A1 we see that A1A2 = BC2 tan A

2 ; from thedilatation of part (a) we have GA′ = 2

3A1A2. Thus,

GA′

BC=

1

3tan

A

2.

Multiplying this by the analogous quotient with respect to the point B′ and sideCA, we have

GA′ ·GB′

CA · CB=

1

9tan

A

2tan

B

2.

Continuing in this manner, we deduce that

GA′ ·GB′

CA · CB+GB′ ·GC ′

AB ·AC+GC ′ ·GA′

BC ·BA

=1

9

�tan

A

2tan

B

2+ tan

B

2tan

C

2+ tan

C

2tan

A

2

�.

The sum in parentheses on the right is known to be 1 (this is just the tangent-of-a-sum identity applied to three angles that sum to 90◦), which completes theproof of part (b).

Also solved by GEORGE APOSTOLOPOULOS, Messolonghi, Greece ; RICARDOBARROSO CAMPOS, University of Seville, Seville, Spain ; OLIVER GEUPEL, Bruhl, NRW,Germany ; VACLAV KONECNY, Big Rapids, MI, USA ; EDMUND SWYLAN, Riga, Latvia ;

Copyright c© Canadian Mathematical Society, 2014

44/ SOLUTIONS

TITU ZVONARU, Comanesti, Romania ; and the proposer. There was one incomplete submis-sion.

Konecny observed that the role of G can be replaced by any point M (except A) on themedian AA1 ; specifically, the featured solution to part (a) shows that if A′ were defined to bethe intersection of the bisector of ∠BAC with the perpendicular to BC through M , then M iscollinear with the orthogonal projections of A′ onto the lines AB and AC.

3706. [2012 : 24, 26] Proposed by Vo Quoc Ba Can, Can Tho University ofMedicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho, Vietnam.

Prove that for all positive real numbers a, b, c, and d which satisfy a, b, c ≥ 1and abcd = 1, X

cyclic

1

(a2 − a+ 1)2≤ 4 .

I. Solution by Michel Bataille, Rouen, France.

Since 2(x2 − x + 1)2 − (x4 + 1) = (x − 1)4 ≥ 0 for all real x, it suffices toshow that

1

a4 + 1+

1

b4 + 1+

1

c4 + 1+

(abc)4

(abc)4 + 1≤ 2

or, equivalently,

1

a4 + 1+

1

b4 + 1+

1

c4 + 1≤ 1 +

1

(abc)4 + 1.

Thus, we have to establish that

f(u) + f(v) + f(w) ≤ f(u+ v + w)

where u = ln a, v = ln b, w = ln c, and

f(x) =1

e4x + 1− 1

2.

It is straightforward to check that f(0) = 0, f ′(x) < 0 and f ′′(x) > 0, so thatf(x) is negative, decreasing and convex on (0,∞). Thus f ′(x) increases to 0. Foreach fixed y ≥ 0, let φ(x) = f(x+y)−f(x)−f(y). Then φ(0) = 0 and the derivativeφ′(x) = f ′(x + y) − f ′(x) is positive on (0,∞), so that f(x + y) ≥ f(x) + f(y).Therefore

f(u+ v + w) ≥ f(u+ v) + f(w) ≥ f(u) + f(v) + f(w)

and the desired inequality follows.

II. Solution by the proposer.

First we establish that, for x, y ≥ 1,

1

g(x)2+

1

g(y)2≤ 1 +

1

g(xy)2,

Crux Mathematicorum, Vol. 39(1), January 2013

SOLUTIONS / 45

where g(t) = t2 − t+ 1. The difference between the two sides of this inequality is�1− 1

g(x)2

��1− 1

g(y)2

�+

1

g(xy)2− 1

g(x)2g(y)2,

a fraction whose denominator is g(x)2g(y)2g(xy)2 and whose numerator is

(g(x)− 1)(g(x) + 1)(g(y)− 1)(g(y) + 1)g(xy)2

+ (g(x)g(y)− g(xy))(g(x)g(y) + g(xy))

= x(x− 1)(x2 − x+ 2)y(y − 1)(y2 − y + 2)(x2y2 − xy + 1)2

− (x− 1)(y − 1)(x+ y)(2x2y2 − xy(x+ y) + x2 + y2 − x− y + 2).

= (x− 1)(y − 1)[xy(x2 − x+ 2)(y2 − y + 2)(x2y2 − xy + 1)2

− (x+ y)(2x2y2 − xy(x+ y) + x2 + y2 − x− y + 2)].

Since(x2 − x+ 2)(y2 − y + 2)(x2y2 − xy + 1) ≥ 4

and4xy = 2(x+ y) + (2x− 1)(2y − 1)− 1 ≥ 2(x+ y),

this numerator is not less than

(x− 1)(y − 1)(x+ y)

×[2(x2y2 − xy + 1)− 2x2y2 + xy(x+ y)− (x+ y)2 + 2xy + (x+ y)− 2]

= (x− 1)(y − 1)(x+ y)[xy(x+ y)− (x+ y)2 + (x+ y)]

= (x− 1)2(y − 1)2(x+ y)2 ≥ 0.

Hence, for a, b, c ≥ 1 and d = (abc)−1,

1

g(a)2+

1

g(b)2+

1

g(c)2≤ 1 +

1

g(ab)2+

1

g(c)2

= 2 +1

g(abc)2= 2 +

1

g(1/d)2

= 2 +d4

g(d)2≤ 4− 1

g(d)2,

which is the desired result. The final inequality is due to the fact that

2− 1 + d4

g(d)2=

(1− d)4

g(d)2≥ 0.

III. Solution by Kee-Wai Lau, Hong Kong, China.

We prove thatnXk=1

1

(x2k − xk + 1)2≤ n

Copyright c© Canadian Mathematical Society, 2014

46/ SOLUTIONS

subject to the restrictions x1, x2, · · · , xn−1 ≥ 1 and x1x2 · · ·xn = 1. This holds forn = 2.

Denote the left side by fn(x1, x2, · · · , xn−1) with xn dependent on the re-maining variables. Assume as an induction hypothesis that

fn(x1, x2, · · · , xn−1) ≤ n

subject to the stated conditions. Assume that x1, x2, · · · , xn ≥ 1, thatx1x2 · · ·xnxn+1 = 1 and fn+1(x1, · · · , xn) is the analogous left side of the in-equality. Then

fn+1(x1, x2, · · · , xn−1, 1) = fn(x1, x2, · · · , xn−1) + 1 ≤ n+ 1.

It remains to show that

fn+1(x1, x2, · · · , xn−1, xn) ≤ fn+1(x1, x2, · · · , xn−1, 1)

when x1, · · · , xn ≥ 1. Now

∂fn+1

∂xn=

2(1− 2xn)

(x2n − xn + 1)3+

2

xng(x1x2 · · ·xn)

where g(t) = t4(2−t)(t2−t+1)−3. When x1x2 · · ·xn ≥ 2, then g(x1, x2, · · ·xn) ≤ 0

and ∂fn+1

∂xn≤ 0.

Now suppose that 1 ≤ x1x2 · · ·xn ≤ 2. Since

g′(t) = t3(t− 1)(t2 − t− 8)(t2 − t+ 1)−4 < 0

for 1 < t < 2, then g(t) is decreasing. Since 1 ≤ xn ≤ x1x2 · · ·xn ≤ 2, it followsthat g(xn) ≥ g(x1x2 · · ·xn) and

∂fn+1

∂xn≤ 2(1− 2xn)

(x2n − xn + 1)3+

2x3n(2− xn)

(x2n − xn + 1)3

=−2(xn + 1)(xn − 1)3

(x2n − xn + 1)3< 0

for xn > 1, so that fn(x1, · · · , xn) is a decreasing function of xn and the desiredresult follows.

IV. Solution by Haohao Wang and Yanping Xia, Southeast Missouri State Uni-versity, Cape Girardeau, MO, USA.

Define fn(x1, x2, · · · , xn−1) as in the foregoing solution with xi ≥ 1 (1 ≤i ≤ n− 1) and xn = (x1x2 · · ·xn−1)−1. We have to show that fn is maximized at(1, 1, · · · , 1), where it assumes the value n.

A critical value fn occurs in the interior of its domain if and only if

0 =∂fn∂xi

=2

xi[h(xn)− h(xi)]

Crux Mathematicorum, Vol. 39(1), January 2013

SOLUTIONS / 47

or h(xn) = h(xi) for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1, where h(t) = t(2t − 1)(t2 − t + 1)−3. Since,for t > 1, h′(t) = −(t − 1)(8t2 + t − 1)(t2 − t + 1)−4 < 0, h is strictly decreasingon [1,∞) so the condition for an extremum is x1 = x2 = · · · = xn. This implies

that h(x1) = h(x−(n−1)1 ). However, h(t) > h(t−1) when t > 1, so that h(x1) >

h(xn−11 ) > h(x−(n−1)1 ) from which we see that there are no extrema in the interior

of the domain of f .Consider the values of fn on the boundary of its domain, say where xn−1 = 1.

Then fn(x1, x2, · · · , xn−2, 1) = fn−1(x1, x2, · · · , xn−2)+1 with x1, x2, · · · , xn−2 ≥1 and x1x2 · · ·xn−1 = 1. By descent, we eventually need to prove the result forn = 2. But this follows from

1

(x21 − x1 + 1)2+

1

(x−21 − x−11 + 1)2

= 2− (1− x1)4

(x21 − x1 + 1)2,

with equality if and only if x1 = x2 = 1. The desired result follows.

Also solved by GEORGE APOSTOLOPOULOS, Messolonghi, Greece ; RADOUANBOUKHARFANE, Polytechnique de Montreal, PQ ; and OLIVER GEUPEL, Bruhl, NRW,Germany. Geupel pointed out that the problem was previously posed by the propo-ser in Vietnamese and reproduced his solution. He refers us to Problem 1.45 on page38f in the e-paper toanhocmuonmaumain.pdf, available on the MathLinks forum websitewww.mathlinks.ro/viewtopic.php ?t=197674. There was one incorrect solution.

It is straightforward to adapt the first two solutions to establish generalizations of the lasttwo.

3707. [2012 : 24, 26] Proposed by Ovidiu Furdui, Campia Turzii, Cluj, Romania.

Let k and m be positive integers. Prove that

Z ∞0

sin2k x

(π2 − x2)((2π)2 − x2) · · · ((kπ)2 − x2)dx = 0 .

I. Solution by Michel Bataille, Rouen, France.

Let I be the given integral. Then I =R∞0 f(x)dx where f(x) = 0 when x

is a positive multiple of π and f(x) = (sin2k x)(Qkj=1((jπ)2 − x2)−1 otherwise for

x ≥ 0. For 1 ≤ j ≤ k,

sin2k x

j2π2 − x2=

sin2k−1 x

jπ + x· sin(jπ − x)

jπ − x· (−1)j−1

and limx→jπ(sin(jπ−x))(jπ−x)−1 = 1, so that limx→jπ f(x) = 0 and f(x) is conti-

nuous on [0,∞). ThusR (k+1)π0 f(x)dx exists. Since also |f(x)| ≤ (

Qkj=1 |(jπ)2 −

x2)|−1 for x ≥ (k + 1)π andR∞(k+1)π(

Qkj=1 |(jπ)2 − x2|)−1dx < ∞, the integral I

exists.We have the partial fraction decomposition

1Qkj=1(jπ)2 − x2

= aj

�1

jπ + x+

1

jπ − x

�,

Copyright c© Canadian Mathematical Society, 2014

48/ SOLUTIONS

so that it suffices to prove that

Z ∞0

�sin2k x

jπ + x+

sin2k x

jπ − x

�dx = 0.

Recall thatR∞0 (sin2k x)x−1dx exists. Then

Z ∞0

�sin2k x

jπ + x+

sin2k x

jπ − x

�dx =

Z ∞0

sin2k x

jπ + xdx+

Z jπ

0

sin2k x

jπ − xdx−

Z ∞jπ

sin2k x

x− jπdx

=

Z ∞jπ

sin2k u

udu−

Z 0

sin2k v

vdv −

Z ∞0

sin2k w

wdw,

using the respective substitutions x = u− jπ, x = jπ − v, x = jπ + w. Thus

Z ∞0

�sin2k x

jπ + x+

sin2k x

jπ − x

�dx =

Z ∞jπ

sin2k x

xdx+

Z jπ

0

sin2k x

xdx−

Z ∞0

sin2k x

xdx = 0

as desired.

II. Solution by Oliver Geupel, Bruhl, NRW, Germany.

We prove the more general statement, that for positive integers k and m,

Z 1

0

| sinx|m

(π2 − x2)((2π)2 − x2) · · · ((kπ)2 − x2)dx = 0.

For each positive integer k, let qk(x) =Qkj=1(x− jπ)(x+ jπ). Then

1

qk(x)=

kXj=1

aj

�1

x− jπ− 1

x+ jπ

where aj = 1/q′k(jx).

We establish, by induction on k, the identity

∞Xn=0

1

qk(x+ nx)=

k−1Xn=0

kX

j=n+1

aj

!�1

x+ nπ+

1

x− (n+ 1)π

�.

The case k = 1 is covered by the equation

∞Xn=0

1

q1(x+ nπ)= a1

∞Xn=0

�1

x+ (n− 1)π− 1

x+ (n+ 1)π

�= a1

�1

x− π+

1

x

�.

Suppose that the identity has been established when the degree of q(x) is

Crux Mathematicorum, Vol. 39(1), January 2013

SOLUTIONS / 49

less than 2k. Then

∞Xn=0

1

qk(x+ nπ)=∞Xn=0

1

qk−1(x+ nπ)+∞Xn=0

ak

�1

x+ nπ − kπ− 1

x+ nx+ kπ

=k−2Xn=0

k−1Xj=n+1

aj

!�1

x+ nπ+

1

x− (n+ 1)π

�+ ak

k−1Xj=−k

1

x+ jπ

=k−1Xn=0

kX

j=n+1

aj

!�1

x+ nπ+

1

x− (n+ 1)π

�,

as desired.For the result, we have that

Z ∞0

| sinx|m

qk(x)dx =

∞Xn=0

Z (n+1)π

| sinx|m

qk(x)dx =

∞Xn=0

Z π

0

| sin(x+ nπ)|m

qk(x+ nπ)dx

=

Z π

0| sinx|m

∞Xn=0

1

qk(x+ nπ)dx =

Z π

0f(x)dx,

where

f(x) = | sinx|mk−1Xn=0

kX

j=n+1

aj

!�1

x+ nπ+

1

x− (n+ 1)π

�.

Note that f(x) = −f(π − x). Therefore,

Z π

0f(x)dx = −

Z π

0f(x− π)dx = −

Z 0

πf(u)(−du) = −

Z π

0f(x)dx,

whenceR π0 f(x) = 0 and the conclusion of the problem follows.

Also solved by PAOLO PERFETTI, Dipartimento di Matematica, Universita degli studidi Tor Vergata Roma, Rome, Italy ; and the proposer. Perfetti set sinx = 1

2i(eix − e−ix) and

used contour integration to solve the problem.

3708. [2012 : 24, 26] Proposed by Vaclav Konecny, Big Rapids, MI, USA.

Construct the isosceles trapezoid with three equal sides a, with a straightedgeand a compass alone, provided that its base b = AB and the angle α (0◦ < α < 90◦)at the base are given.

Solution by Chip Curtis, Missouri Southern State University, Joplin, MO, USA.

Construct rays with initial points A and B that intersect at a point C suchthat ∠CAB = ∠CBA = α. Let the bisector of ∠CAB intersect BC at D, andthe bisector of ∠CBA intersect AC at E. Construct segment DE. Then ABDEis the desired isosceles trapezoid. Proof : Since ∠CED = ∠CAB = α, we have∠AED = 180◦ − α. Since ∠EAD = α/2,

∠EDA = 180◦ − α

2− (180◦ − α) =

α

2.

Copyright c© Canadian Mathematical Society, 2014

50/ SOLUTIONS

It follows that triangle ADE is isosceles with base angles at A and D. Thus,AE = ED. By symmetry BD = DE, so that AE = ED = DB.

Also solved by ROY BARBARA, Lebanese University, Fanar, Lebanon ; MICHEL BA-TAILLE, Rouen, France ; OLIVER GEUPEL, Bruhl, NRW, Germany ; JOHN G. HEUVER,Grande Prairie, AB ; EDMUND SWYLAN, Riga, Latvia ; TITU ZVONARU, Comanesti, Ro-mania ; and the proposer. There was one incorrect submission.

Most of the constructions used the bisectors of the base angles as in the featured solu-tion. For the solutions of Konecny and of Zvonaru, they constructed the length a after havingdetermined that a = b

1+2 cosα= bt

t+b, where t = AC (in the notation of the featured solution).

Bataille located the reference I.M. Yaglom, Geometric Transformations I, MAA (1962) pages132-133, where a more challenging variant of our problem can be found : Given ∆ABC (notnecessarily isosceles), construct D on side BC and E on side AC such that AE = ED = EB.

3709. [2012 : 25, 27] Proposed by Pham Van Thuan, Hanoi University ofScience, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Let a, b, and c be nonnegative real numbers, k and l ≥ 0 and define

a+ b

2−√ab = k2 ,

a+ b+ c

3− 3√abc = l2 .

Prove that

max(a, b, c) ≥ min(a, b, c) +3

2(k − l)2 .

Solution by Oliver Geupel, Bruhl, NRW, Germany, expanded by the editor.

We set M = max(a, b, c), m = min(a, b, c) and assume, without loss ofgenerality, that a ≤ b.

Note that

k2 =2

3(b− a)− 1

6(b+ 6

√ab− 7a) ≤ 2

3(M −m)

since 0 ≤ b− a ≤M and b+ 6√ab− 7a ≥ 0. Hence

k −r

2

3(M −m) ≤ 0 ≤ l . (1)

By Schur’s inequality we have for x, y, x ≥ 0, that

x2(x2 − y2)(x2 − z2) + y2(y2 − z2)(y2 − x2) + z2(z2 − x2)(z2 − y2) ≥ 0

which together with the AM-GM inequality then yields

x6 + y6 + z6 + 3x2y2z2 ≥Xcyclic

(x4y2 + x2y4) ≥ 2(x3y3 + y3z3 + z3x3) . (2)

Setting x6 = a, y6 = b and z6 = c, then (2) becomes

a+ b+ c+ 33√abc ≥ 2(

√ab+

√bc+

√ca)

ora+ b+ c

3≥ 2

3(√ab+

√bc+

√ca)− 3

√abc .

Crux Mathematicorum, Vol. 39(1), January 2013

SOLUTIONS / 51

Hence,

l2 =a+ b+ c

3− 3√abc ≤ 2

3

�a+ b+ c−

√ab−

√bc−

√ca�

. (3)

We now prove the inequality below :

2(a+ b+ c−√ab−

√bc−

√ca) ≤ 3k2 + 2(M −m) . (4)

To this end we consider three cases separately :

Case (i). If a ≤ b ≤ c, then M −m = c− a, so (4) becomes

2�a+ b+ c−

√ab−

√bc−

√ca�≤ 3(a+ b)

2− 3√ab+ 2(c− a) .

The last inequality above, after straightforward computations, reduces to

5a+ 2√ab+ b ≤ 4

√bc+ 4

√ca

which is true since 4a ≤ 4√ca and a+ 2

√ab+ b ≤ 4

√bc.

Case (ii). If a ≤ c ≤ b, then M −m = b− a and after simplifications (4) reducesto

5a+ 2√ab+ 4c ≤ 4

√ca+ 4

√bc+ 3b

which is true since 5a = 4a+a ≤ 4√ca+√bc, 2√ab ≤ 2b and 4c = 3c+c ≤ 3

√bc+b.

Case (iii). If c ≤ a ≤ b, then M −m = b− c and (4) reduces to

a+ 2√ab+ 8c ≤ 4

√bc+ 4

√ca+ 3b

which is true since a+ 2√ab ≤ b+ 2b = 3b and 8c ≤ 4

√bc+ 4

√ca.

This completes the proof of (4).From (3) and (4) we deduce

l2 ≤ k2 +2

3(M −m) ≤

�k +

r2

3(M −m)

�2

so

l ≤ k +

r2

3(M −m) . (5)

From (1) and (5) we obtain

|k − l| ≤r

2

3(M −m)

and the desired conclusion follows.

Also solved by the proposer.

Copyright c© Canadian Mathematical Society, 2014

52/ SOLUTIONS

3710. [2012 : 23, 25] Proposed by Billy Jin, Waterloo Collegiate Institute andEdward T.H. Wang, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON.

Given n ∈ N, show that there exists a k ∈ N such that for all m ≥ k,there exists a sequence of m consecutive natural numbers which contains exactlyn primes.

Solution by Victor Pambuccian, Arizona State University West, Phoenix, AZ,USA.

We claim that the statement of the problem holds with k = pn where pnrepresents the nth prime.

To prove the claim, let m ≥ k be an integer, and let fm(x) be the numberof primes in the set {x, x+ 1, . . . , x+m− 1}. Then

fm(x+ 1) = fm(x) + εm(x), (1)

where εm(x) ∈ {−1, 0, 1}. Then, since m ≥ pn, we must have fm(1) ≥ n and sincethe numbers (m+1)!+2, (m+1)!+3, . . . , (m+1)!+m+1 are all composite, we musthave fm((m+1)!+2) = 0. Thus, from (1), the list fm(1), fm(2), . . . , fm((m+1)!+2)contains all integers from 0 to fm(1) ≥ n (and possibly some greater than fm(1)),hence there is a number, y, between 1 and (m+ 1)! + 2 such that fm(y) = n andtherefore there are exactly n primes in the list y, y + 1, . . . , y +m− 1.

Also solved by GEORGE APOSTOLOPOULOS, Messolonghi, Greece ; ROYBARBARA, Lebanese University, Fanar, Lebanon ; RADOUAN BOUKHARFANE, Po-lytechnique de Montreal, PQ ; OLIVER GEUPEL, Bruhl, NRW, Germany ; ALBERTSTADLER, Herrliberg, Switzerland ; and the proposers.

Crux MathematicorumFounding Editors / Redacteurs-fondateurs : Leopold Sauve & Frederick G.B. Maskell

Former Editors / Anciens Redacteurs : G.W. Sands, R.E. Woodrow, Bruce L.R. Shawyer

Crux Mathematicorum

with Mathematical Mayhem

Former Editors / Anciens Redacteurs : Bruce L.R. Shawyer, James E. Totten, Vaclav Linek,

Shawn Godin

Crux Mathematicorum, Vol. 39(1), January 2013