solaris symphony thin client
DESCRIPTION
Thin Client architecture & back-end Virtual Desktop DeliveryTRANSCRIPT
-Thin Client-Going Thin
Mahadzir Bin BakarBusiness – Technology ManagerSolaris Symphony Sdn. [email protected]
Agenda
• Who we are• Fat Client Issues/Challenges• Thin Client Background• Virtual Desktop Infrastructure• 2X Solutions• CENTERM Thin Client• Thin Client Benefits• Next Step
SOLARIS SYMPHONY SDN. BHD.
Founded in end 2010, focusing on information security consultancy & services.100 % Bumiputra company:• 1 sales personnel• 1 technical sales personnel• 2 technical support personnel
Our strength is on our personnel:• 3 CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker) certification• 1 CHFI (Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator) certification• 3 IBM Proventia Intrusion Prevention System certification• 2 Fortinet Firewall certification
Experiences & Projects
Past personnel experiences:• Telecommunications (MAXIS, TIME)• Logistics (DHL Asia Pacific & EMEA)• Security consultancy (MINDEF, DRB HICOM, Bank Negara)
Past significant projects:• MINDEF Network Infrastructure Design Revamp
― Project cost RM 40,000.00― Project covers MINDEF internet and DMZ network infrastructure
• MINDEF Network Security Assessment― Project cost RM 24,000.00― Project covers MINDEF critical servers (Aplikasi, Pembangunan, Teknikal & Rangkaian)
Fat Client Issues/Challenges
Management Difficulties
High IT Cost
Data Protection
Difficult to ensure data is regularly backed up
Procuring & provisioning new desktop takes a long time.
Software & OS patching coordination nightmare
Technology refresh every 3 – 5 years
Moving parts issue (CPU fan, HDD)
High utility cost (power)
Thin Client DefinitionGartner’s definition:
“ a type of client/server computing where applications are run, and data is stored, on the server rather than on the client.”
Fat Client
• Desktop PC performs computations• Data is stored in local hard disk
Thin Client
• External server performs computations• Data is stored in a central repository
Thin Client Background
• First envisioned in 1960s.• Established in 1993 by Tim Negris, Oracle Corp.• The idea was not viable at that time.
1980s – 90s:▪ Architecture relies on huge
and expensive mainframe computers
▪ Personal computers are the cheaper option.
Now:§ Cheaper and powerful
hardware.§ Personal computers
technology obsoletes very rapidly.
Thin Client Evolution
Thin Client Concept
Thin Client Computing§ Hardware/Software
• Monitor, keyboard & mouse• Hardened/Thin OS
§ Functions• Keystroke issuance• Display computing results
Data Center§ Hardware/Software
• Presentation server/Gateway• Connection broker software
§ Functions• Central computing and processing• User session management
Delta Screen Refresh
Keystrokes
VM 2 VM 3VM 1
Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
Desc • Dedicated virtual desktop environment
UserCase
• Ideal for users who require personalization and more CPU resources
Drawbacks • Fixed CPU and RAM allocation – resource underutilized
• Connection broker software could offset hardware savings
Products • Citrix XenDesktop• VMWare View• ThinLinc VDI Broker• 2x Application Server
XG
Apps
Data
OS
Apps
Data
OS
Apps
Data
OS
Hardware
Connection Broker
Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
Introduction to Centerm
About Centerm
• Founded in 2002 - engaged in telephone payment terminal and thin client's R&D, sales and service.
• Ranks No.1 for10 consecutive years in China in graphic terminal sales.
• Ranks No.1 for 5 consecutive years in China in thin clients.
• Ranks no. 1 in thin clients sale for APAC (2009)
• Important partner of Intel, Microsoft and AMD in thin client market of China.
• Microsoft Gold Partner award for consecutive 6 years.
• CENTERM thin client hardware§ Existing peripherals can be used§ Supports VMWare, Citrix, 2X and Microsoft RDP§ CENTERM thin client hardware MTBF of
approximately 7 to 8 years§ Ability to install Windows Embedded System 7* and
2X Thin OS**
CENTERM Thin Client Solutions
CENTERM Thin Client Hardware
Thin Client Benefits
Hardware clients:vendor-independence, support
of virtually all client devices and computer hardware. Less
hardware breakdowns due to minimal moving parts. Low
system requirements
Administration:central management of applications and users,
patches, software updates and upgrades, files and backups as well as hardware components
Security:central management of security
settings on the server and centrally-managed deployment
of applications or files
Mobile access: dependable access to
published applications from virtually anywhere using your
tablets, smartphones or laptops
Environmentally-friendly clients:
low energy consumption, low-
emission, fewer components, smaller
dimensions
Next Step
§ Setting up a POC/demo unit• For further understanding & exploration
Mahadzir bin [email protected]
Power Usage Comparison – Fat vs Thin
Desc • Publish on-demand applications
UserCase
• Ideal for users who require legacy applications not supported on new OS
Drawbacks
Products • Citrix XenApps• VMWare ThinApp• ThinLinc Application
Publishing• 2X Application Server
XG
Applications Publishing/Provisioning
App
2
App
3
App
1
Hardware
Connection BrokerOS
Application Publishing/Provisioning
Desc • One instance of OS to be shared by multiple users
UserCase
• Ideal for users who use minimal applications or require low CPUutilization
Drawbacks • Unless adequately protected, one virus/malware can affect whole shared OS
Products • Citrix XenDesktop• ThinLinc• Centerm CTSS
Shared Desktop(Multi-session) Apps
Data
OS
Hardware
Connection Broker
Shared Desktop
Bandwidth Consumption Comparison
Major Project ExperiencesData Center Network RedesignTIME
Customer is facing issues such as high CPU utilization, low memory usage, high traffic and concurrentsession utilization that effect the services for customers drives this project and customer decided toupgrade the existing firewall and load balancer to support it needs.
Data Center network being design based on security based practice to support customer’s serviceofferings. This includes introducing new segment/VLANs, relocation and reconfigurations of networkequipment (switch/router) and servers. New policy and firewall rules being configured to protect thenetwork and servers.
Centralized Vulnerability Management SystemMAXIS
Customer is having difficulties managing vulnerabilities in the network due to geographical and networksegmentation issues. Another pressing problem is to consolidate all devices’ security issues into oneview and track them systematically.
Solaris Symphony working together with customer leads to a customized solution where a securitymanagement system manages all devices centrally and enabling customer to perform vulnerabilitytesting remotely without having to be physically at the remote premise. All vulnerabilities are thensystematically tracked and prioritized according to risk level. This solution manage to reduce customer’slogistic spending and also reduce time to respond.
Network Infrastructure Design RevampMINDEF
Customer contracted Solaris Symphony to investigate and analyze multiple network and securityproblems faced daily.
Solaris Symphony dedicated team worked together with customer technical team to understandthe issues and produce an effective and cost minded solution for customer. Customer networkhas been redesign with minimum new product purchase and downtime.
High Availability Intrusion Prevention SystemMAXIS
Customer intends to implement intrusion prevention system with high availability in mind due tocriticality of the network.
Solaris Symphony delivers a solution where 4 pairs of IPS appliance were deployed to strategicplaces and managed centrally with one management server. Estimated daily traffic is 1TBcombined.
Major Project Experiences
Thin Client Flavours
Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
Desc • Dedicated virtual desktop environment
UserCase
• Ideal for users who require personalization and more CPU resources
Drawbacks • Fixed CPU and RAM allocation – resource underutilized
• Connection broker software could offset hardware savings
Products • Citrix XenDesktop• VMWare View• ThinLinc VDI Broker• 2x Application Server
• Publish on-demand applications
• Ideal for users who require legacy applications not supported on new OS
• Citrix XenApps• VMWare ThinApp• ThinLinc Application
Publishing• 2X Application Server
• One instance of OS to be shared by multiple users
• Ideal for users who use minimal applications or require low CPU utilization
• Unless adequately protected, one virus/malware can affect whole shared OS
• Citrix XenDesktop• ThinLinc• Centerm CTSS
Applications Publishing/Provisioning
Shared Desktop(Multi-session)