soil engineering and engineering geology · i nasa contractor report lunar soil engineering and...

17
I NASA CONTRACTOR REPORT LUNAR SOIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGY Prepared under NASA Contracts NSG-496 and NSR-05-003- 189 by T. William Lambe and James K. Mitchell MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY For NASA CR-6 1178 . NASA-GEORGE C. MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER Huntsville, Alabama October 20, 1967 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19670030073 2018-06-13T02:20:45+00:00Z

Upload: doxuyen

Post on 30-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

I NASA CONTRACTOR REPORT

L U N A R S O I L E N G I N E E R I N G A N D E N G I N E E R I N G G E O L O G Y Prepared under NASA Contracts NSG-496 and NSR-05-003- 189 by T. William Lambe and James K. Mitchell

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY

For

~~~~

NASA CR-6 1178

.

N A S A - G E O R G E C . M A R S H A L L S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Huntsville, Alabama October 20, 1967

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19670030073 2018-06-13T02:20:45+00:00Z

October 20, 1967 NASA CR-6 1178

/ LUNAR SOIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGY-

BY

T. William Lambe and James K . Mitchell

Prepared under NASA Contracts NSG-496 and NSR-05-003- 189 by

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts

and

University of California Berkeley , California

Space Sciences Laboratory

Distribution of this report is provided in the interest of information exchange. Responsibility for the contents res ides in the author or organization that prepared it.

N A S A - G E O R S E C . M A R S H A L L S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R

PREFACE

This paper presents the results of one phase of studies conducted

during the period, July 1-31, 1967, under NASA research contracts

NSG-496, "Lunar Surface Engineering Properties Expzriment Defini-

tion, with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,

Massachusetts, and NSR-05 -003-189, "Materials Studies Related to

Lunar Surface Exploration, I' with the University of California, Berk-

eley, California.

Both studies a r e sponsored by Code MTL, NASA Headquarters,

and a r e under the technical cognizance of the Space Sciences Labora-

tory, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center.

LUNAR SOIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGY

T. W i l l i a m Lambe? and James K. M i t c h e l l 2

P o s i t i o n Paper Prepared for NASA 1967 Summer Conference on Lunar E x p l o r a t i o n and Science,

U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a a t Santa Cruz J u l y 31 - August 13, 1967

I. INTRODUCTION

Th i s pape r sets f o r t h o b j e c t i v e s and recommendations f o r t h e develop-

ment of a long-range program i n s o i l eng inee r ing and eng inee r ing geology

f o r suppor t o f l u n a r e x p l o r a t i o n and s c i e n c e . It w a s i n t ended t o serve as

a b a s i s f o r d i s c u s s i o n s a t t h e 1 9 6 7 NASA Summer Conference on Lunar

E x p l o r a t i o n and Sc ience , Un ive r s i ty of C a l i f o r n i a , San ta Cruz, J u l y 31 -

August 13, 1967 which would l e a d t o fo rmula t ion by t h e working groups of

a sound working p l a n f o r guidance o f s o i l and rock eng inee r ing s t u d i e s .

T h i s pape r i s b r i e f and many items are covered only i n o u t l i n e form. It

i s b e l i e v e d , however, t h a t t h e major problems of l u n a r e x p l o r a t i o n t h a t

r e q u i r e a t t e n t i o n by s o i l eng inee r s and engineer ing geologists a r e noted .

Types of measurements and ana lyses t h a t may be used f o r t h e i r s o l u t i o n are

sugges t ed where a p p r o p r i a t e . It is impor tan t t o n o t e t h a t t h i s paper w a s

p repa red p r i o r t o t h e San ta Cruz Conference, and, consequent ly , does n o t

r e f l e c t any of t h e d e c i s i o n s o r p r i o r i t i e s e s t a b l i s h e d as a r e s u l t of t h e

Conference.

P r o f e s s o r and Head of t h e S o i l Engineer ing D i v i s i o n , Massachuse t t s I n s t i t U t e o f Technology, Cambridge , Massachuse t t s . A s s o c i a t e P r o f e s s o r of C i v i l Engineer ing , Un ive r s i ty of C a l i f o r n i a , Berkeley.

1

2

11. RECOMMENDATION

A coord ina ted program i n Lunar S o i l and Rock Engineer ing shou ld b e

i n i t i a t e d and developed by NASA. It i s recommended t h a t NASA e s t a b l i s h an

in-house s o i l and rock mechanics l a b o r a t o r y equipped and s t a f f e d s o t h a t

s o p h i s t i c a t e d s o i l tes ts and a n a l y s e s can be made. The pr imary f u n c t i o n

of t h i s l a b o r a t o r y should be t o a t t a c k t h e s h o r t range problems r e l a t e d t o

a l l l u n a r mis s ions , bo th manned and unmanned.

Long-term suppor t should b e provided t o two o r t h r e e u n i v e r s i t i e s

a l r e a d y s t r o n g i n s o i l and rock mechanics and wi th some expe r i ence i n t h e

space program.

u n i v e r s i t i e s should be cons idered . The r o l e s of t h e u n i v e r s i t y l abora -

t o r i e s should b e t o conduct b a s i c r e s e a r c h on l u n a r s o i l and rock p r o p e r t i e s ,

develop new methods f o r s o l u t i o n of l u n a r s u r f a c e materials problems, back

up t h e NASA in-house l a b o r a t o r y , t r a i n s t u d e n t s f o r p o s i t i o n s i n t h e space

program, and h e l p d e f i n e and s o l v e t h e many unfo reseen , b u t i n e v i t a b l e

problems t h a t w i l l a r i se .

Space s c i e n c e c a p a b i l i t y i n r e l a t e d areas w i t h i n t h e

A r e l a t i v e l y small b u t h igh q u a l i t y program of t h i s t ype shou ld r e s u l t

i n s av ings of money, t i m e , and p o s s i b l y l i f e , f a r i n excess of t h e i n v e s t -

ment.

111. GOALS

The u l t i m a t e g o a l s of t h e Lunar S o i l and Rock Eng inee r ing Program

should be :

A. To develop t h e c a p a b i l i t y of p r e d i c t i n g , a t l eas t i n a s e m i -

q u a n t i t a t i v e manner, s o i l c o n d i t i o n s a t any p o i n t on t h e moon

on the b a s i s of remote measurements.

2

B. To develop t h e c a p a b i l i t y f o r d e t a i l e d q u a n t i t a t i v e determina-

t i o n of s o i l and rock p r o p e r t i e s a t any chosen s i te where

s c i e n t i f i c o r eng inee r ing work i s contemplated.

C. To develop methods of a n a l y s i s s u i t a b l e f o r s o l u t i o n of s o i l and

rock mechanics problems on t h e moon.

D. To u t i l i z e t h e s p e c i a l environmental c o n d i t i o n s on t h e moon,

p a r t i c u l a r l y vacuum, tempera ture , and r a d i a t i o n , t o o b t a i n d a t a

t h a t w i l l a i d i n t h e unders tanding of s o i l and rock behav io r on

t h e e a r t h .

I V . LUNAR SOIL AND ROCK PROBLEMS

The fo l lowing are some of t he major problems i n l u n a r e x p l o r a t i o n

t h a t depend on s o i l and rock mechanics f o r s o l u t i o n .

A. Dynamic b e a r i n g capac i ty f o r s p a c e c r a f t l and ing .

B. Rocket b l a s t e r o s i o n problems.

C .

D. T r a f f i c a b i l i t y f o r roving v e h i c l e s and walking a s t r o n a u t s .

Contamination of systems by eroded s u r f a c e material.

T7 C. Slope s r z b i l i t y dur ing l and ing , t r a v e r s i n g , and c o n s t r u c t i n g .

F. Sampling.

G. S t a b i l i t y of l a b o r a t o r i e s and emplaced s c i e n t i f i c s t a t i o n s .

H. D r i l l i n g .

I. Underground excavat ion .

J. Underground cons t ruc t ion .

K. Underground s t o r a g e .

L . Waste d i s p o s a l .

M. Rad ia t ion s h i e l d i n g .

N. Thermal i n s u l a t i o n . 3

0. Cons t ruc t ion materials.

P. Mineral r e s o u r c e l o c a t i o n .

Problems A through H are o f immediate concern i n t h e Apollo and Apollo

A p p l i c a t i o n s Programs. Problems I through P w i l l become impor t an t shou ld

post-AAP development o f t h e moon be undertaken.

V. LUNAR SOIL E N G I N E E R I N G PROGRAM

F i r s t p r i o r i t y i n t h e Lunar S o i l and Rock Eng inee r ing Program shou ld

be t h e de t e rmina t ion of e n g i n e e r i n g pa rame te r s o f l u n a r s o i l s .

tests on r e t u r n e d samples w i l l b e needed, coupled w i t h tests run on l u n a r

s o i l i n - s i t u . For t h e conduct of s o i l and rock tests on t h e l u n a r s u r f a c e

t h e t e s t i n g equipment should be s i m p l e , rugged, a d a p t a b l e t o t h e h a r s h

l u n a r environment, and automated t o t h e e x t e n t p r a c t i c a b l e , The test

methods should y i e l d d a t a which can b e i n t e r p r e t e d mean ingfu l ly i n terms

o f t h e parameters needed f o r s o i l and rock mechanics a n a l y s e s . E x i s t i n g

and proven t h e o r i e s and methods of a n a l y s i s shou ld be used wherever

p o s s i b l e . S e l e c t i o n of tes t methods and development o f a p p a r a t u s shou ld

b e g i n immediately.

Labora to ry

A s test resul ts become a v a i l a b l e they shou ld be c o r r e l a t e d w i t h

remote s e n s i n g d a t a s o t h a t t h e r e l i a b i l i t y o f a n a l y s e s based on remote

measurements can be improved. Remote s e n s i n g , p rov ided r e l i a b l e methods

can be developed, may prove t o be t h e most economical means f o r determina-

t i o n of g e n e r a l s u r f a c e mater ia l p r o p e r t i e s .

Of second p r i o r i t y i s t h e development o f improved a n a l y t i c a l

t echn iques f o r such problems as dynamic b e a r i n g c a p a c i t y , s l o p e s t a b i l i t y

and t r a f f i c a b i l i t y . Methods of a n a l y s i s , e x c e p t p o s s i b l y i n t h e area of

t r a f f i c a b i l i t y of s o i l s and m o b i l i t y of v e h i c l e s , are r e a s o n a b l y w e l l

4

,

advanced, provided t h e a p p r o p r i a t e s o i l d a t a can be ob ta ined . The r e s u l t s

of Surveyor I and 111 have been encouraging i n p rov id ing improved estimates

of p e r t i n e n t s o i l p r o p e r t i e s ; however, t h e ranges of p o s s i b l e va lues must

be narrowed and t h e v a r i a b i l i t y from l o c a t i o n t o l o c a t i o n determined. A s

of t h i s t i m e t h e number of v a r i a b l e s s t i l l exceeds t h e number of indepen-

dent d i r e c t measurements t h a t have been made s o t h a t unproven assumptions

remain i n a l l q u a n t i t a t i v e e s t i m a t e s of s o i l p r o p e r t i e s .

Meaningful e v a l u a t i o n s of i n - s i t u s o i l s t r e n g t h and c o m p r e s s i b i l i t y

p r o p e r t i e s from t h e r e s u l t s of tests on r e t u r n e d specimens r e q u i r e s

s e c u r i n g s u i t a b l e undis turbed s a m p l e s . Thus t h e development of a p p r o p r i a t e

sampling techniques must be given high p r i o r i t y .

As t ronaut t r a i n i n g is an e s s e n t i a l component of a sound program i n

s o i l and rock eng inee r ing . S ince t h e a s t r o n a u t s w i l l be t h e "engineers i n

t h e f i e l d , " they should be educated t o some minimum l e v e l of p r o f i c i e n c y

i n t h e s e areas. It should be noted t h a t s o i l and rock eng inee r ing are f a r

from p r e c i s e q u a n t i t a t i v e d i s c i p l i n e s and expe r i ence and judgment f a c t o r s

p l a y an impor tan t p a r t i n development of optimum s o l u t i o n s t o problems.

V I . NECESSARY SOIL PROPERTY DATA FOR SOLUTION OF SPECIFIC PROBLEMS

Table 1 has been p repa red , based on t h e major problem a r e a s l i s t e d i n

S e c t i o n I V , t o i n d i c a t e s p e c i f i c p r o p e r t i e s of l u n a r materials t h a t must

b e known i f r easonab le s o l u t i o n s t o t h e problems are t o be expec ted . Also

l i s t e d are t h e a u t h o r s ' assessments of t h e s u i t a b i l i t y of e x i s t i n g a n a l y t i -

ca l methods f o r handl ing t h e problems.

\

5

V I I . PROPERTY MEASUREMENT

Table 1 relates s o i l and rock p r o p e r t i e s t o s p e c i f i c problems

a s s o c i a t e d wi th t h e s c i e n t i f i c and eng inee r ing a s p e c t s o f l u n a r explora-

t i o n . Table 2 is concerned wi th methods f o r measuring t h e d i f f e r e n t

p r o p e r t i e s . An i n d i c a t i o n (which i n many cases i s an op in ion ) i s g iven

f o r each of t h e fo l lowing f a c t o r s wherever p o s s i b l e .

A. Whether measurement can be made by remote s e n s i n g (RS), tests-

i n - s i t u (TIS) , tests on s a m p l e s a t a l u n a r base ( L B S ) , o r t e s t s

on e a r t h r e t u r n e d samples (ERS).

B. A recommendation a s t o which of t h e f o u r p o s s i b l e approaches

l i s t e d i n A shou ld be used f o r

1. Gather ing d a t a f o r c l a s s i f i c a t i o n purposes ( C ) .

2 . P re l imina ry miss ion p l ann ing (PMP).

3 . F i n a l mi s s ion p l ann ing (F’MP).

4 . Determina t ion of des ign pa rame te r s (DP) . Table 3 p r e s e n t s a l i s t i n g of some s p e c i f i c tes t methods which might

be used f o r a c q u i s i t i o n of t h e necessa ry d a t a f o r p r o p e r t y e v a l u a t i o n s .

An i n d i c a t i o n is g iven ( aga in an op in ion i n most c a s e s ) as t o t h e s u i t -

a b i l i t y of e x i s t i n g test methods, t h a t are wide ly used f o r s t u d i e s of

terrestr ia l s o i l s and rocks , f o r use i n d e t e r m i n a t i o n of l u n a r material

p r o p e r t i e s .

s u r f a c e materials are no ted where a p p r o p r i a t e . Of p a r t i c u l a r importance

i n t h e development of t e s t i n g methods and a p p a r a t u s f o r i n - s i t u l u n a r s o i l

t e s t s and tests performed a t l u n a r b a s e s i s c o n s i d e r a t i o n of t h e h a r s h

l u n a r environment , t h e n e c e s s i t y t o keep pay loads t o a minimum, t h e l i m i t e d

d e x t e r i t y of a space - su i t ed a s t r o n a u t , and t h e d e s i r a b i l i t y f o r t echn iques

t h a t are s imple , r e l i a b l e , and r a p i d .

Usefu l t echn iques a l r e a d y developed f o r s t u d y of l u n a r

V I I I . CONCLUSION

Tables 1-3 r e p r e s e n t bu t a c r u d e f i r s t a t t empt t o c l a s s i f y problems,

s o i l and rock p r o p e r t i e s , and tes t methods i n a form which may be help-

f u l i n fo rmula t ion of r e s e a r c h e f f o r t s f o r a s y s t e m a t i c program of l u n a r

e x p l o r a t i o n . Much f u r t h e r ref inement of a l l a s p e c t s of t h e t o p i c s

covered is needed and most of t h e i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s p re sen ted r e q u i r e

c r i t i c a l examinat ion i n d e t a i l . It should be no ted t h a t emphasis through-

o u t h a s been on de te rmina t ion of p r o p e r t i e s f o r u se i n s o l u t i o n of s p e c i f i c

eng inee r ing problems. Data obta ined from measurements of t h e type

sugges t ed , however, may be expected t o be of g r e a t s c i e n t i f i c va lue as

w e l l . It i s hoped t h a t t h i s paper w i l l s e r v e as a s t i m u l u s f o r s tudy by

t h e rest of t h e Working Group and t h a t a sound program i n s o i l mechanics

and eng inee r ing geology w i l l emerge.

7

Q a, Q a, a, z U 0 z m Q 0

a, )f

4 m V

*,+ U h 4

5

3

Q a, -0 a, al z U

i?

U C

E a, > 0 Ll

*r(

a a, al c h rl P m 0 Ll P.l

2

n

m a, Q U 0

9. a, Q m rl

ld a, V U 4 -r(

" 5 3

3

U c m U Ll 0 a E .,+ a, P

2 6 m U

v 4 U m .rl Ll a, U V m & rd c V

5 M c a !4 U m a G

c fd Ll U ffl I m ul a Ll U m u4 0

h V c a, a c a, a a, Q

a, E 4 w .. a, U 0 z

c 0

.r( m a, c 0 V

a, a m s m a 5 a, N .rl m m

a, a, -4 4 u V L l

e,+ a, u a Llo m L l a a - c h O U d .,+ m m a l c s 8:

4 *,+ 0 4 m a m w s o m C Q o c .,+ m (0 ala,

a m "a,

c 4 0 0

*,+ .,+ m u a l L l e m o a V

- m h 4 u m *A a,+

m L l o a l Llu o m a E - L l h a u s

e,+ u m o

2 .$:

*

5 0 n u

- m a, .4 U Ll

a l a , N a .,+ 0 m L l a a c c m o

e,+

a m N O -,+ c m a m c

c 0 .,+ U 3 4 0 m Ll 0 w a a, Q a, a, C

10 al 3 4 m 3

h U Ll a, a 0 Ll

P 4

-

8 rl P 0 &I P.l

*A Ll u m u a,

h U h

U *,+ V m a ld U

m E a, U

u s M c .4 u

e,+

V m a m V

m m 4 P

'4 m 0 Ll al

U u) ld rc P

u i a v al a,+

m m w h U

a,+

4 .A P a U m al a 0

Q C ld

c 0

M c r( 4 rl .r(

n

00 C 4

.r( U ld > ld CJ x w

u *r( U ld U m

U a!

8 rl

v) rl m

\o rl m 0 d

o\

I -

g -4 U 3 d 0 m $4 0 w a 9) a 9) z m 9) 3 rl a > h U h 0) a 0 I4 PI

h 9 ) r l u $ 4 rd *4 *4 rd t-lw a o a u9) a a a 0 f u r l

$4 0

W

m *4 U t-l 9) a 0 $4 a C 0 rl U n.

0 a

h U d m s n

U m 2 U *4 w d U

a m

h U d

9) a

h U *4 > U 0 1 a C 0 U

rl a 6 $4 al Jz .b

z

G 0 *rl U U 1 $4 U m C 0 U

a

0 $4 M & al a G 3

5

9) M a $4 0 U m a

0 $4 M $4 al V

5

s

I t-l 9) a G 1

4 a m 0 a m r( a n

V 9 ) G u 1 a & 560

V

m o

rl hl m .3 rl rl rl rl

m al U $4 1- o w m o 9) $ 4 c

0 44 a u & a a l o

X - $3 I- d

C 0 rl U m U *4 w *rl m

rl U

3 3 U s m rl

9

N $4 0 h

TI al

$ & a l &

o w w

h U $4 al a 0 bl

h U d rl d P d u) m al bl a B 0 W

m

P.4 n

C 0 *,-I m al c 0 u ‘d C m c 0 *d U V .,-I Ll

U-I

v,

h U *d

o a

U c bo rl

2 .I

f

8 U

h 4l d

al a 2

I

I . I

10

r 4 Ll 0 Lr,

h U t4 9) a 0 &I PI

a

Q P d P d G ~ d n n ~ d

u) U G 4 U

0 0

u *r( U

4 rl W

3

m

E a -PI w n v

a & w n w w

h U d m 0 t4 0 PI

0 rl

#

32l2 H d W

h U d r( r( P 4

i 0) PI

m 4

w w w v

G 0 d U d m 0 a

W

* rl

11

m $4 m U m E ld $4 ld a rl -4 0 m $4 Q

0 w 0

5

2 0 *4 u

m ? m ld m al t4

m m d U $4 P) a 0 $4 a rl 4 0 m t4 a,

0

w 0

C 0 -4 U

5

5 m m a m P) $4

*rl 1 d P) fx

c C Y o o l d O O P ) E 6 3

ld U ld a P) a 1 $4 U

h rl C 0

c 4 ld 4J P 0

m U ld 1 0. P) a 4

d. f df22

B U ld w $4 1 v)

m m a , ala 1 0 r l r l a m

m -0 0 5 2! U m a, P

a, rl e -4 m m 0 PI

P) C 0 U

C *A U m > $4 a m m e P a o l d

$4 U M 0 0 P)u b o -4 c C a P I

3 2 U m *4 m P) $4

g -4 U ld $4 U a, C 0) PI

.j

a C m

In a, rl a E m m a P) C t4 3 e, P) Ll

t U $4 ld w

I

h U t4

PI

m N *

12

m al d

5 s z"

2d U

n

5 0

rr C

v d m 'c

u a c

n a al 3 C -d U C 0 U

m w

W

: H

a d u u d r n

d c nnn n w u v w w w m 3 n u - a, rt

m U m a, U

c 0 .ri U m Ll U al

.C al P4

U I ld

C M G 2 I

Q U a, m

u ; n u U

U 3 al

Ll

J

i s h U

m a, d u & a, a 0 Ll P4 G 0 d m al c -0 4

Q\

m a, .r( U Ll a, a 0 $4 B4

-4

2 a,

=3

m U C m U

0 2 2

$

d

rl U m rl

U d s 9

d rl I

13

h U $4 PI a 0 Ll

P.4

cn E $4 0 w a U m 1

a 4 3

$4 a e -4 w h 0 w

?: 0 U V m w m -4 U m m C 1

m -0 a P) N a .rl cn 0 m p:rl

w a a > c $40 a 4 o a m m w

*rl a Ll $4 a .n O P I U w e r m d a m I 4 h 8 b I

- I 4 PI 0 m a s Lr 4 m

L

m 0 .I4 U

m ?i m m a $4 d 3 w a $4

P n m

n

W

W

I I a U U V 0 PI E h

p: - a 2

e 0 d U d m 0 a

U

14

h

5 Ll m a c 0

h h O n u a v a 4 m 4 . n

c w 0 m 0 m c ' d

m a 10 m a $4 U cn PI U 1 rl 0 m e 4

rD 4