social work education and technology: challenges and opportunities
DESCRIPTION
Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities. Graduate School of Social Work University of Denver James Herbert Williams April 10, 2010. Faculty Leaders. Jean East Walter LaMendola Catherine Alter Julie Laser John Kayser Eugene Walls Michele Sienkiewicz. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and
OpportunitiesGraduate School of Social Work
University of DenverJames Herbert Williams
April 10, 2010
![Page 2: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Faculty Leaders
• Jean East• Walter LaMendola• Catherine Alter• Julie Laser• John Kayser• Eugene Walls• Michele Sienkiewicz
![Page 3: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
CSWEAlternative Re-affirmation Project
• A major CSWE request was to carry out a comparative study of F2F, blended, and on-line delivery of social work practice classes
• The organizing theories for our effort were those dealing with teaching and learning.
• The theories identify three important forms of presence, one of which is called social presence.
![Page 4: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
DU/GSSW Study
• Investigated student perceptions of social presence, connectedness, and learning in F2F, On-line and Blended courses
• Practice Courses– Multicultural Social Work Practice– Community I– Clinical I– Field Seminar– School Social Work
![Page 5: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
How People Learn
![Page 6: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Good Teaching Practice
![Page 7: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Community of Inquiry Model
![Page 8: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Social presence in learning communities
• Social presence “defined as the ability of learners to project themselves socially and affectively into a community of learners” (Rourke, Anderson, Garrison and Archer, 2001, p.2).
• Social presence seen as a main component of community
– Affective Communication to establish trust and respect
– Open Communication– Cohesion and
Collaboration
![Page 9: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Social presence in the classroom• Students and teachers create social presence in social work
education. Examples from good practice includeOpportunities of self disclosure
Spontaneity and humorCreating awe
Expressing emotionsForms of discussion
• Research indicates that information and communication technologies support the development of social presence
![Page 10: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Social work distance education
• Started as off-site programs often associated with meeting the needs of isolated communities
• Now communication and information technologies are in common use regardless of distance
• Schools of social work use ICT, reaching local constituencies, isolated communities, and, in fact, students around the world
![Page 11: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Presence
• presence, not distance, has returned to the center stage as a defining consideration in effective educational delivery.
• Presence is still the carrier of relationships, but with a much broader range.
• Presence is no longer contained by the physicality of the instructor as memorialized by terms such as “sage on the stage” or “guide on the side.”
![Page 12: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Three perspectives examined in DU Reaffirmation Project
• Organizational Environment• Faculty Environment• Course delivery modalities, i.e.
– Face to face– On-line– Hybrid (mixes of face to face and on-line)
![Page 13: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Organizational Environment• Study One: Leadership assessment of the organizational environment
for social work education ICT and e-learning.• Question: How are ICT and e-learning tools perceived by leaders of
schools of social work today and how is that assessment aligned with their mission and goals?
• Purpose: To report on leadership perceptions about the use and alignment of forms of distance education in schools of social work using Alan Knowles’s (2007) framework for integration of e-learning in social work education
• Method/measures: A survey of deans and directors of schools of social work was conducted on use of distance education technologies and plans in the future. Focus groups were facilitated and interviews of 15 deans were conducted at CSWE meeting in October, 2007.
![Page 14: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Organizational environment findings/ Deans
• Themes of transformation and faculty engagement considered most difficult.
• Transformation difficult because it involved risk and required a new way of thinking.
• Faculty engagement difficult because it required new learning and organizational mandates.
• Overall, many of the deans expressed strong ambivalence
![Page 15: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Faculty Environment• Study Two: Faculty engagement through a Learning Community approach• Question: How does the use of a blended learning approach with a
Faculty Learning Community facilitate the development of a learning environment that integrates new learning technologies in social work education?
• Purpose: The research literature indicates that Faculty Learning Community processes used with faculty consistently and over time can lead to the successful adoption of new learning technologies.
• Method/measures: Seven faculty and two staff participated in the study. The study used a blended collaborative learning process adapted from Vaughan(2004). The analysis included a case study, discourse analysis (Rourke, et al., 1999), and knowledge mapping tools (Horn, 2008; Kirshner, Shum & Carr, 2003).
![Page 16: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Faculty development
• Community of Inquiry theory informed 2 year process
• Explored mix of presences (cognitive, teaching, social) in course development for effective social work learning
• Faculty learning community was generated that fostered practical inquiry, course development, individual accomplishment
![Page 17: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Learning Environment• STUDY THREE: Social work practice courses in alternative course delivery
formats• Questions: • What is it that occurs in excellent face-to-face instruction that is potentially
missing in technology-based delivery of education? • How do teachers adjust their teaching approach and pedagogy to maximize
cognitive presence given different technologies of course delivery? • How do students experience online classes in comparison to face-to-face
instruction? • How do faculty experience online classes in comparison to face-to-face
instruction?• Purpose: This study directly examines the overall issue of interest to CSWE
in regard to face-to-face versus computer-mediated learning.
![Page 18: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Learning environment• Measures/methods: Short, Williams, and Christie (1976) social
presence scale, Rovai (2002) classroom community scale, Richardson and Swan (2003) student assessment of learning environment measure, the Shea, Pickett and Pelz (2003) teaching presence measure, student course evaluations, faculty reports, and student focus groups.
• Five courses: overall N of 99 students with 19 in face to face, 27 in on-line, 53 in blended coursework.
![Page 19: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Courses involved in study three
![Page 20: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Practice courses can be effectively taught in any format
• social presence and teaching presence were major influences on course outcomes and student satisfaction, regardless of format of delivery
• classroom community developed in all formats and was a significant contributor to reported learning
![Page 21: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
presence, not distance
• It is critical for CSWE to assist members in their consideration of how these learning technologies may contribute to competencies.
• The expanded capacity to creatively use forms of presence for teaching and learning is undoubtedly the most important contribution of convergent technologies to social work education thus far.
![Page 22: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Community of Inquiry
• Such a model is very useful to, and directly fits with the pedagogical goals of social work.
• It assists social work education by focusing on concepts of human presence in teaching and learning
• It assists social work practitioners by grounding convergent technologies in the “person in environment” framework.
![Page 23: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
National Leadership Needed
• Social work needs to get involved with the Sloan Consortium which helps members to improve quality, scale, and breadth of their
• Sloan-C supports the collaborative sharing of knowledge and effective practices to improve learning effectiveness, access, affordability for learners and providers, and student and faculty satisfaction.
![Page 24: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
National Leadership needed
• Social work needs to participate in the Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching (MERLOT)
• MERLOT is a set of partner organizations that provides peer reviewed and selected higher education, online learning materials
![Page 25: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
National Leadership Needed
• Strategies for faculty engagement need to be aggressively pursued by CSWE as an essential part of improved social work education.
• more visibility needed for social work experts at CSWE and NADD sharing research findings and models for curriculum development.
• Do not exclude new programs - share best practices, develop protocols, and establish criteria for excellence in social work e-learning.
![Page 26: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Local leadership needed most
• faculty must have access to the tools and support systems they need
• faculty need leadership, dedicated time, and a supportive community that facilitates the transition to a new teaching and learning environment.
• These efforts must be sustained over time to be successful
![Page 27: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Local leadership
• Increase their knowledge of the research on e-learning outcomes
• Resolve competing priorities• provide institutional support and resources• Assist with a pedagogical alignment that is
unique to a practice profession. • Knowles (2007) provides a comprehensive
beginning model to assess social work organizational environments.
![Page 28: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Research
• need for ongoing research by social work educators to address the learning of practice skills and the development of a professional identity in an e-learning environment.
• Existing evidence indicates that practice based professions can be effective in developing e-learning models of curriculum delivery
![Page 29: Social Work Education and Technology: Challenges and Opportunities](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062400/5681691d550346895de045bf/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Primary issue: How social work will…
• Address the emerging practice of intentionally blending learning technologies to best meet specific learning objectives.
• Master the expansion of human presence afforded by communication technologies
• Blend present and emerging models of content delivery to meet the needs of today’s students and tomorrow’s social workers.