social annotation in social network sites fred stutzman sils, unc-chapel hill [email protected]

12
Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill [email protected]

Upload: rose-kerry-jackson

Post on 14-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Social Annotation in Social Network

SitesFred Stutzman

SILS, UNC-Chapel [email protected]

Page 2: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Tagging in SNS?

Page 3: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Tagging One’s Self

•What are rates of maintenance and upkeep of these self tags?

•How are individuals using self tags in social network sites?

•What types of tags exist in social network sites?

Page 4: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Tag Maintenance

•Longitudinal analysis (n=3505, t=16 weeks)

•UNC-Chapel Hill Freshman, 2005

•How are self tags maintained over time?

•What are the most popular self tags?

•What is the self tag rate of change?

Page 5: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Findings

Page 6: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Findings

Element Share Rate Change Rate

Gender 98% .21%Home State 93% 1.8%

Major 85% 12%Rel. Stat. 90% 26%

Looking For 63% 28%Friends 100% 93%

Page 7: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Findings

Elements Share, 1 Share, 16 Delta

Books 4.7 4.9 43.1%

Movies 8.9 9.7 52%

Interests 7.8 8.5 54.8%

Music 13.4 14.5 55.8%

Page 8: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Self-tags in SNS

•Pilot content analysis (n=50), undergraduate profiles at UNC-Chapel Hill

•Boundary of a tag: hyperlinked referent from a profile to a “pool”

•Concentration: Fluid elements

•Specific concentration: Interests, Favorites

Page 9: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Preliminary Analysis

•Tag types

•Object - Wedding Crashers, Blink 182

•Genre - Chick Flicks, Hip-Hop, Layin’ in the sun

•Concept - Random things, All things Pumpkin

•Action - Playing (x), Chillin’

Page 10: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Preliminary Analysis

•Self tags as

• Individual descriptors (my favorite book, genres of films)

•Group memberships

•Society-level (religion, political belief)

•Present-network level (campus groups, inside jokes)

Page 11: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Next steps

•Other self-tags in profiles?

•Photo tags

•Group memberships

•Application participation

Page 12: Social Annotation in Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman SILS, UNC-Chapel Hill fred@metalab.unc.edu

Thank you

•Email: [email protected]

•Website: http://ibiblio.org/fred

•Blog: http://chimprawk.blogspot.com