social accounting matrix for ecuador, an income ......through the years 2006 and 2014 sorce: inec,...
TRANSCRIPT
Social Accounting Matrix for Ecuador, an income distribution outlook
CENTRAL BANK OF ECUADOR
October 15th , 2020
Seminar on National Accounts for Latin America and the Caribbean: The future of Economic Statistics
PRESENTATION CONTENT
What is a Social AccountingMatrix (SAM) and what is itused for?
Methodology
InformationSources
DevelopedProducts
Result Analysis
1
2
3
45
1: What is a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) and what isit used for ?
1: What is a SAM and what is it used for ?
• It is a matrix that represents thecircular flow of income for aparticular economy and a specificyear (particular time period)
• It links the productive sector withthe functional distribution ofincome regarding economic actorsand the use that the latter give toincome.
•The SAM addresses issues ofpersonal income distribution andhousehold spending patterns.
Definition
•Distributive analysis of totalincome and expenditurestructure
• Industrial interrelationships witheconomic agents
• SAM is an input for staticsimulations (fixed coefficientmodels).
• Input for the elaboration ofcomputed general equilibriummodels
Applications
1: What is a SAM and what is it used for ?
Types of matrices
Traditional SAM
Table Supply and Demand (TSD) without
transformation +
Integrated EconomyTable (IET)
SAM Input Output Matrix
(IOM)
TSD transformed in (IOM)
IOM Industry
SAM System OfNational
Accounting(SNA)
A perspective of resourcesand uses
2: Methodology
2: Methodology: Deductive Method
Development of a
Macro
SAM
• It shows the macroeconomic aggregates that must be divided
• It allows a verification of the macroeconomic balances in National Accounts
Development of a Micro
SAM
• Industries, products and agents are disaggregated
• TSD at level 1 and IET for 5 institutional sectors including the Rest of the World
• IOT I*I is also used
Openinghouseholds
• In order to obtain deciles of consumption and income, household surveys arecarried out : there are 10 different households
• Determination of variable structures are needed including: income,expenditure, transfers and salaries
• An econometric model is applied to correct compensation for under-declarationand reach the level of the Macroeconomic National Accounts
• An econometric model is applied for the structure of the Capital Account
2: Methodology: MICRO-SAM Opening
Production
Matrix
Supply and intermediatedemand (ID)
IOT symmetric matrix
Import +
M de ID
Taxation of products
Subsidies ofproducts
Custom duties
Functional IncomeDistribution
Wages and salaries plus social
contributions
Gross operatingsurplus + mixed
income
Taxes on production
Final DemandVectors
Non-profitInstitutions (NPI)
Final GovernmentConsumption
Final HouseholdConsumption
Gross FixedCapital Formation
(GFCF)
Exports
Redistribution ofIncome Matrix
Dividends
Utilities
Interest gains
Transfers
Capital Account
Savings
Net Loan
Change Existences
Gross FixedCapital
Formation
3: Information Sources
3: Information Sources
• Generation and use of production in current values
• 72 products and 69 activitiesSupply – Demand Table (SDT)
• It uses the symmetric matrix of 71 x 71 industries in current valuesImput and Output Matriz (IOM)
• It offers a global vision of the economy through institutional sectors:Societies, Households, Government, NPISH, Rest of the world)Integrated Economic Table (IET)
• Disaggregation through household deciles of income
• Functional and personal distribution of the income
• 5th and 6th ECV surveys were used (2006-2007 and 2014).
Conditions of Life Survey (ECV)
• Disaggregation of deciles of consumption specific productsIncome and Expenditure HouseholdSurvey (ENIGHUR )
• Disaggregation of deciles of income for Gross Fixed Capital Formation
Employment and UnemploymentSurvey (Enemdu) + NationalEconomic Census (CENEC)
4: Developed Products
Traditional
view SAM 2007
Traditionalview SAM
2014
SAM view IOM 2007
SAM view IOM 2014
Shock simulator of
SAM 2007 IOM view
Shock simulator SAM2014 IOM view
4: Developed and Published
https://contenido.bce.fin.ec/documentos/PublicacionesNotas/Catalogo/CuentasNacionales/MCS/Indice.htm• Matrix at macro and micro level• Simulators• Methodological Notebooks• Distributive Analysis
5: Results Analysis
Distributive Statistics
1: Personal HoseholdIncome Structure
2: HoseholdExpenditure Structure
5: Results Analysis
5: Results Analysis, Distributive Statistics
There is a distributive change in income between Ecuadorian households through the years 2006 and 2014
Sorce: INEC, ECVDeveloped by: Central Bank of Ecuador
Sorce : INEC, ECVDeveloped by: Central Bank of Ecuador
39.3
44.8
52.2
38.3
25.8
13.60
18.80 20.10
12.90
5.70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1995 1998 1999 2006 2014
Poverty and Extreme Poverty ConsumptionNational (urban y rural)
Poverty Extrem Poverty
0.42
0.440.45 0.46
0.410.40
0.420.42 0.43
0.39
0.37
0.380.39
0.40
0.35
0.32
0.34
0.36
0.38
0.4
0.42
0.44
0.46
0.48
1995 1998 1999 2006 2014
Gini Coeficient of consumption
National Gini Urban Gini
5: Results Analysis, Personal Household’s Income
At a microeconomic, thetotal income between
households is analyzed:
The richest decile (tenth) represented 15.6 times higherthan the total income of the poorest decile in 2007, however for 2014 this relationship is 12.2 times richer
.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
Decile1 Decile2 Decile3 Decile4 Decile5 Decile6 Decile7 Decile8 Decile9 Decile10
2.33.4
4.35.1
6.17.2
8.9
11.3
15.6
35.9
2.74.0
4.85.7
6.67.8
9.1
11.4
15.0
33.0
Evolution of the participation of total income by deciles
Income Structure 2007 Income Structure 2014
The growth in income is reflected in the final consumption expenditure of households.
5: Results Analysis, Household Expenditure Structure
00
05
10
15
20
25
30
Decile1 Decile2 Decile3 Decile4 Decile5 Decile6 Decile7 Decile8 Decile9 Decile10
3.8
4.85.5
6.37.2
8.29.3
11.5
15.0
28.5
4.25.4 6.0
6.97.6
8.79.8
11.4
14.7
25.4
Structure of final consumption of manufactured prodcts
Structure 2007 Structure 2014