smv 150 + sof 400 open-label optimist-2 study: smv + sof for genotype 1 and cirrhosis w12 objective...
TRANSCRIPT
SMV 150 + SOF 400
Open-label
OPTIMIST-2 Study: SMV + SOF for genotype 1and cirrhosis
W12
Objective– Superiority of SVR12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml) versus a historical control (composite
of SVR with SOF + PEG-IFN + RBV in naïve and SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV in experienced patients (SVR12 of 70%) : lower limit of the 95% CI for the SVR12 > historical control SVR12. Analyses by ITT
Lawitz E. EASL 2015, Abs LP04
N = 103SVR12
* Liver biopsy or Fibroscan > 12.5 kPa or Fibrotest > 0.75 + APRI > 2
OPTIMIST-2
Design
18-70 yearsHCV genotype 1
Naïve or pre-treatedwith IFN-based regimen
Non-decompensated cirrhosis*
HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/mlNo prior therapy with PI
No HBV or HIV co-infection
OPTIMIST-2 Study: SMV + SOF for genotype 1and cirrhosis
N = 103Median age, years 58
Female 19%
Race : white/black 80% / 18%
Body mass index 28.8
Genotype1a Q80K+1a Q80K-1b
33%37%30%
IL28B non-CC genotype 72%
HCV RNA log10 IU/ml, median 6.8
Fibroscan score > 20 kPa 15/26 (58%)
Prior treatment with IFN-based regimen, n (%)RelapseNon-responseIFN-intolerantOther
52 (51%)2
179
25
Baseline characteristics and patient disposition
OPTIMIST-2 Lawitz E. EASL 2015, Abs LP04
SVR12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), % (95% CI), intent-to-treat
OPTIMIST-2 Study: SMV + SOF for genotype 1and cirrhosis
OPTIMIST-2 Lawitz E. EASL 2015, Abs LP04
25
50
100
75
83*(75.8-91.1)
*Superior to historical control
88(78-98)
Overall Naïve 1aQ80K+
Experienced
79(67-91)
74
9284
1aQ80K-
1b
N 103 50 53 34 38 310
Genotype
CC
86 8579
CT TT
29 54 19
IL28B
> 20
80
100
≤ 20
15 11
Fibroscan
%
Failures, overall and according to sub-groups, N (%)
* 7/12 had genotype 1a and prior null response to PEG-IFN + RBV
Resistance testing (population sequencing) of 14 failures– NS3 resistance emergence to SMV, N = 11 (position 168 alone or R155K
alone or combined with mutations at other positions)– Resistance to SOF (S282T) : 0
N = 103
On-treatment virologic failure 3
Relapse, N (%)Naïve patientsExperienced-patientsFibroscan > 12.5 to ≤ 20 kPa Fibroscan > 20 kPa
13 (13%)6%
19%0%
14%
OPTIMIST-2 Study: SMV + SOF for genotype 1and cirrhosis
OPTIMIST-2 Lawitz E. EASL 2015, Abs LP04
OPTIMIST-2 Study: SMV + SOF for genotype 1and cirrhosis
N = 103
Grade 3 adverse event 5
Grade 4 adverse event 1
Serious adverse event 5
Adverse event with fatal outcome 1 (road traffic accident)
AE leading to discontinuation 3 (sepsis ; rash, death by road accident)
AE in ≥ 10% in either groupHeadacheFatigueNausea
212111
AEs of interestRash (any type)Pruritus PhotosensitivityDyspneaIncreased bilirubin
1614532
Grade 3 amylase elevation / Grade 4 lipase 6 / 1
Adverse events
OPTIMIST-2 Lawitz E. EASL 2015, Abs LP04
Summary– The combination of SMV + SOF for 12 weeks
• demonstrated superiority in SVR12 rates (83%) versus the historical control (70%) in treatment-naïve and -experienced HCV genotype- 1 infected patients with cirrhosis
• achieved SVR12 rates higher for genotype 1a without Q80K (92%) versus those with Q80K (74%)
– SVR12 was ≥ 85% for patients with IL28B CC or CT, for treatment-naïve patients and for patients with platelet count ≥ 90,000/mm3
– SVR12 was ≥ 94% for cirrhotic patients with albumin ≥ 4 g/dl and FibroScan score >12.5 to ≤ 20 kPa
– Viral relapse was the primary reason for not achieving SVR12 – Patient-reported outcomes scores significantly improved from baseline,
as observed by the Week 12 follow-up visit coincident with the SVR12 assessment
– SMV + SOF for 12 weeks was safe and well tolerated; most adverse events were Grade 1 or 2
OPTIMIST-2 Study: SMV + SOF for genotype 1and cirrhosis
OPTIMIST-2 Lawitz E. EASL 2015, Abs LP04