smu form 2a 2011 application

Upload: julian-a

Post on 07-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    1/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 1 of 39August 2010

    ALTERNATIVE ROUTES TO CERTIFICATIONPROGRAM PROPOSAL

    FORM 2A

    Section 1-Program Information

    Program Name: Secondary Teacher Alternative Route (STAR)

    Institution or OrganizationName: Saint Martins University

    Type of certificate program

    x Residency Teacher Certificate

    Routes Offered

    Route 1: Alternative Route programs for classified staff with one year of instructionalexperience that hold a transferable Associate of Arts or Sciences degree.

    x Route 2: Alternative Route programs for currently employed classified staff with one year ofinstructional experience that hold a minimum of a Bachelor of Arts or Sciences degree from aregionally accredited college or university.

    x Route 3: Alternative Route for individuals with subject-matter expertise in shortage areas,currently employed outside the school system, that hold a minimum of a Bachelor of Arts orScience degree from a regionally accredited college or university.

    x Route 4: Alternative Route for individuals teaching with conditional or emergency certificates.

    Endorsement(s) for Teacher Preparation. Alternative Route Applicants must hold PESBapproval to offer endorsements. For PESB guidelines related to endorsement approval go tohttp://sites.google.com/a/pesb.wa.gov/home/prepprogram/prep_programs/approval/endorsement-approval.

    Early Childhood Early Childhood Special Education (Birth-3)

    Elementary & Middle Level (For Alternative Routes: all K-8 endorsement candidates must be

    pursuing at least one of the following shortage area endorsements along with the K-8endorsement: Mathematics, Middle Level Math, any Secondary Science, Middle Level Science,English Language Learner, Bilingual Education, Special Education or a locally identifiedshortage area).

    Elementary (K-8) with:

    Mathematics x Middle Level Math (With Secondary) x Middle Level Science (With Secondary)

    English Language Learner Bilingual Education Special Education

    http://sites.google.com/a/pesb.wa.gov/home/prepprogram/prep_programs/approval/endorsement-approvalhttp://sites.google.com/a/pesb.wa.gov/home/prepprogram/prep_programs/approval/endorsement-approvalhttp://sites.google.com/a/pesb.wa.gov/home/prepprogram/prep_programs/approval/endorsement-approvalhttp://sites.google.com/a/pesb.wa.gov/home/prepprogram/prep_programs/approval/endorsement-approvalhttp://sites.google.com/a/pesb.wa.gov/home/prepprogram/prep_programs/approval/endorsement-approval
  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    2/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 2 of 39August 2010

    Science Biology Chemistry Earth & Space Science Physics

    Locally identified shortage area:

    Secondary (5-12):

    x Science x Biology x Chemistry Earth & Space Science Physics

    x Mathematics Locally Identified Shortage area:

    All-level (P-12) Endorsements for Alternative Routes are restricted to the followingshortage areas:

    x Special Education (Birth-12)* x Bilingual x English Language Learners

    *Special education usually requires special education coursework prior to beginning theprogram

    Locally Identified Shortage area:

    Organization type

    Four-year public college or universityx Four-year independent college or university

    Community College Other public agency (ESD, School District)

    Private non-profit organization Private for-profit organization

    Section 2 -Proposal Contents

    Applicants through this program shall specify the following:

    A. Need for program

    Content Shortage Areas- The degree to which a district, or consortia of districts, are currently experiencingteacher shortages in math, science, special education and/or bilingual education/ELL. Other locally identifiedshortage areas may be documented.

    Endorsement Shortage Areas by County/ School District Demographics (alphabetical order)

    King County: The OSPI most recently published Educator Supply and Demand in Washington State 2006

    Reportindicates geographical teaching shortage areas with forecasted increasing or considerable need

    in the teaching areas of: Special Education, Mathematics, Middle Level Math/Science, ScienceEarth,Physics, Chemistry, Biology; English as a Second Language; Early Childhood Special Education (areas in

    bold indicate shortage areas to be served by this program).

    Highline School District: Highline School district serves 17,531 students and includes eighteen

    elementary schools, four middle schools, two comprehensive high schools, and ten special

    emphasis academies serving secondary students. The District includes 43.8 square miles and

    has 1010 certificated employees, and approximately 900 classified employees. Students are

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    3/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 3 of 39August 2010

    diverse with 36% minority students in 2009-10 and 21% ELL students with 70 different

    languages spoken in our students homes.

    Mason County: The OSPI most recently published Educator Supply and Demand in Washington State

    2006 Reportindicates geographical teaching shortage areas with forecasted increasing or considerable

    need in the teaching areas of: Mathematics; Middle Level Math/Science, Special Education; Science -

    Earth Science, Physics, Biology, Chemistry, (areas in bold indicate shortage areas to be served by this

    program).

    Shelton School District: Shelton School District serves 4246 students who attend three

    elementary schools, one middle school, one junior high school, one high school, and one

    alternative school. Several of Sheltons 273 teachers have been awarded Regional Teacher of

    the Year from Education Service District 113. Greater than 50% of the students in Shelton

    receive free/reduced-price meals.

    Pierce County: : The OSPI most recently published Educator Supply and Demand in Washington State

    2006 Reportindicates geographical teaching shortage areas with forecasted increasing or considerable

    need in the teaching areas of: Mathematics; Middle Level Math/Science, Special Education; Science -

    Earth Science, Physics, Biology, Chemistry, (areas in bold indicate shortage areas to be served by thisprogram).

    Clover Park School District: Clover Park School District is the 21st largest public school district in

    Washington State and fourth largest of 15 in Pierce County. The district, located immediately

    south of Tacoma, encompasses 26 square miles including the city of Lakewood, Fort Lewis Army

    Post and McChord Air Force Base. With an enrollment nearing 12,000 students, more than 40

    percent of the districts students come from military or federally connected families. Clover

    Park has 26 schools, including 17 elementary schools, four middle schools, two high schools,

    one alternative high school, and four special schools including two at Western State Hospital.

    With well over a thousand ELL students and 60 languages spoken at home, linguistic diversity is

    prominent.

    Tacoma School District: Tacoma Public Schools is the states second largest school district in theState and encompasses 56 square miles. There are 28,890 students attending Tacomas five

    high schools, nine middle schools, 37 elementary schools and 14 alternative programs. Staff

    members, full and part time exceed 3500 including 2033 teachers. The city of Tacoma is

    located on Puget Sound and has a population of 196,300.

    Thurston County: The OSPI most recently published Educator Supply and Demand in Washington State

    2006 Reportindicates geographical teaching shortage areas with forecasted increasing or considerable

    need in the teaching areas of: Mathematics; Middle Level Math/Science, Special Education; Science -

    Earth Science, Physics, Biology, Chemistry, (areas in bold indicate shortage areas to be served by this

    program).

    Olympia School District: Olympia School District enrolls 9381 students for the 2009-2010 schoolyear. Olympia School District employs approximately 1200 classified and certificated staff,

    including 524 teachers, to provide education in 18 schools. Founded in 1852, OSD is one of the

    oldest districts in the state. Our approach to educational excellence is a holistic one, with strong

    programs in IB and AP, fine arts, technology, basic education, and athletics.

    Tumwater School District: Tumwater School District encompasses 117 square miles. In addition

    to its ten schools the district operates attendant support facilities consisting of transportation,

    maintenance, food services, and the district office. The district owns just over 247 acres. It is

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    4/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 4 of 39August 2010

    situated at the southern end of Puget Sound in Thurston County, and incorporates a majority of

    the city of Tumwater, which is located approximately 65 miles southwest of Seattle, and a small

    portion of the City of Olympia. Schools are situated on both rural and urban sites.

    Yelm Community Schools: Yelm Community Schools is located in southeast Thurston County inthe Puget Sound region. Currently we serve more than 5,400 students in six elementary, two

    middle, one high and one special school. Among our approximately 650 staff are 286 teachers.

    Many of our students are from military families and represent diverse cultural backgrounds.

    It is apparent the economic challenges facing the state and its school districts have created an air of

    uncertainty among the districts in the consortium regarding specific hiring needs. They expect to do

    significant hiring in high needs areas, but are cautious about stating numbers. As a result of the

    potential restraint in hiring in the short term, there is a concern among district administrators that

    when economic conditions recover, there will be a spike in retirements as well as the need to fill

    temporarily unfilled positions, causing a substantial shortage of teachers in these high needs areas. As

    financial conditions improve, the number of positions needing to be filled is expected to exceed the

    average number during the past ten years. In a recent year, two weeks after the opening of school in

    most of those districts, our partnership districts had the following open positions: Math 14, Science

    4.5, Bilingual Education/ESL 2, Special Education 21. Other interested districts that were not formalpartners had the following openings: Math 11.5, Science 8, Bilingual Education/ESL 2.5, Special

    Education 15. This number of unfilled positions provides dramatic testimony for the need of the

    program in the partner, and similar, districts.

    Minority Teacher Shortage: Minority information for the partner districts indicate a need for increased

    minority teachers. As seen in the chart below, the percent of minority students in the districts ranges

    from 17.4% to 80.6%. With the state average of minority teachers reported by various sources as 8% to

    14%, this indicates a serious need to increase minority teachers to serve as role models for minority

    students in these districts. Saint Martins University has an overall student minority average of 27%; the

    Education Division an overall student minority average of 18%; and the Alternative Route STAR program

    a cumulative average of 17% minority candidates since 2002. The current enrollment of STARcandidates for 2010-2011 indicate 11% minority status.

    Table: Enrollment and Percentage of students by ethnicity and special programs

    Comparison CPSD Highline NTSD Olympia Shelton Tacoma Tumwater Yelm

    Enrollment 11,947 17,531 13,952 9,381 4,246 28,890 6,287 5,470

    % A Ind /Alas N 1.6 1.8 2.8 1.2 7.7 1.9 1.9 3.3

    % Asian/Pac.Isl. 10.2 19.5 13.7 9.5 2.1 13.7 4.2 3.3

    % Black 18.0 12.1 9.2 2.4 1.2 22.9 2.6 2.4

    % Hispanic 19.2 31.6 11.3 4.9 16.3 14.2 5.0 7.0

    % White43.5 29.4 60.1 75.0 70.2 47.2 82.6 77.7

    % Free/Reduced 63.9 63.4 38.6 25.3 57.7 57.0 29.0 38.8

    % Special Educ. 14.7 13.1 13.4 13.4 17.1 7.9 12.7 12.8

    % Bilingual 9.8 21.3 3.3 2.2 6.8 7.3 0.5 0.7

    Source: http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us October 2009 information available

    http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/
  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    5/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 5 of 39August 2010

    B. Market Analysis

    1. Evidence of regional need for the program -The institution or organization will identify other college ofeducation programs operating in the region and describe how the proposal addresses areas of the statethat are experiencing a shortage of certification programs to serve school districts within the region. Addressspecific information related to critical needs of regional school districts, the degree to which those needs are(or are not) currently being met, and the demographics of the region. Also include the geographic location,

    the identification of the major decision-makers, and any seasonal or cyclical trends which may impact theprogram.

    Saint Martins University proposes to serve Candidates from the south Puget Sound area, with

    particular emphasis on Pierce, Thurston, Lewis and Grays Harbor Counties, as well as sections of

    South King County. Because the service areas of programs are not clearly delineated, which existing

    programs serve the area is subject to interpretation. In addition to Saint Martins University,

    primary programs are The Evergreen State College, the University of Washington-Tacoma, Pacific

    Lutheran University, University of Puget Sound, City University and the Lesley University/TCC

    program.

    The Saint Martins Alternate Route Program has been in operation since 2002 and has successfully

    prepared candidates for positions in the service area. Saint Martins University is located in Lacey,

    WA providing ready access via Interstate 5, US Highway 101, and State Route 8. Although most of

    the candidates have come from the Olympia to Tacoma corridor, we recruit from the sparsely

    populated areas of the region such as Lewis, Grays Harbor, Pacific and Cowlitz counties. The intense

    summer institute makes it feasible for candidates from outlying areas to participate in the program.

    They can then be placed in more distant locations for their year-long internship. Historically, the

    program has received from 25 to 40 applications each year, with enrollments of from 14 to 25.

    Enrollments the past three years have been the highest in the programs history. For the 2011-2012

    cohort, interest has been strong although some individuals have cited the uncertainties about

    educational funding and have expressed concern that there may not be positions available when

    they complete the program.

    The program is intended to serve particular needs of the partnership districts as well as other

    districts based upon their needs. Key decision-makers from the university are the STAR Program

    Director, The Dean and the Associate Dean of the College of Education and Professional Psychology.

    Within the districts, key decision-makers are the Superintendents, Human Resources

    Directors/Teacher Employment Coordinators, as well as the individuals charged with placing

    Student Teachers. The STAR Program has a long history of working successfully with the various

    district personnel to meet their needs.

    2. Describe the unique features of the program design.

    The program is designed to meet the requirements of the RFP. Therefore many of the features of

    the program are held in common with other alternate route programs. However, some features do

    distinguish the STAR program from similar programs.

    It is possible to earn an MIT through participation in the STAR program. The first year is

    spent in the coursework and year-long internship leading to certification before the end of

    the first year. The second year is devoted to other MIT requirements including four classes

    for the Graduate Core and the exit requirement.

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    6/39

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    7/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 7 of 39August 2010

    B. Classroom Placement

    District partners and Alternative Route programs will describe how interns in the Alternative Route programwill be placed in K-12 classroom(s) with a trained mentor teacher(s) all day, every day for the duration oftheir mentored internship. Alternative Route programs and district partnerships must verify that they willprovide each candidate with intensive classroom mentoring until such time as the intern demonstrates thecompetency necessary to manage the classroom with less intensive supervision and guidance from the

    mentor teacher.

    All partnership members are committed to developing and maintaining a supportive and on-

    going mentoring program. In addition to participating in the Washington State Mentor Training

    Academy, the coalition will develop a district mentor program as well as participate in the

    Mentor Training Program. These certified mentors will be called upon to ensure the success

    of new teachers; and identify, recruit and develop additional mentor teachers within the ranks

    of the coalitions teaching staffs. Development programs for the Mentor Training will include

    instruction in the following: 1) Techniques for teachers working with adult learners; 2) Teaching

    strategies (cognitive coaching, learning in focused conversations); 3) Skills and technical

    needs; 4) Recognition of best practices; 5) Communication and interpersonal skills; 6) How to

    observe and evaluate a new teacher; 7) Developmental growth of a teacher what to expect; 8)

    Certification standards; 9) Assessment how do you know if there is learning; 10) Knowing and

    using all teacher support systems.

    The partnership will assign one mentor teacher to each teacher intern. The mentor teacher will

    provide the teacher intern with intensive classroom mentoring. The intent will be to provide

    the alternate route teacher candidate more responsibility and independence as the alternate

    route teacher candidate demonstrates increased competency. The mentor teacher will not be

    assigned another classroom or other duties, therefore, there will not be competition for the

    mentor teachers time and attention (with the exception ofmentors for contracted Route 4

    candidates). During the later part of the intern period, the mentor teacher will be asked to

    develop a written assessment of the alternate route teacher candidates strengths and

    weaknesses. This written assessment will be for the exclusive use of the alternate routeteacher candidate. The written assessment will also focus on suggested courses or training that

    will assist the professional development of the new teacher.

    Examples of Individual District Commitment to Mentoring

    Clover Park School District: CPSD recognizes that new and even seasoned teachers require

    help, guidance and mentoring to achieve great success in the classroom. CPSD also recognizes

    that a single approach to providing assistance and help to teachers is insufficient to the task of

    ensuring the success of our teachers. Too much rests on the quality of teachers to put anything

    less than a quality support system in place to assist teachers in the mission of teaching our

    children what they need to know to succeed and contribute to their community. The CPSD

    Teacher Support System includes: Mentor Teacher Program Manager: The Mentor Teacher Program Manager works with

    an advisory team (representatives from the teachers association and several local

    colleges and universities) to ensure that only the best teachers are selected to mentor

    student teachers or new first-year teachers.

    New Teacher Mentor Program: This program is designed to help first-year teachers

    succeed during a critical period in their professional development. The program

    involves intense mentoring, requires monthly meetings and classroom observations and

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    8/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 8 of 39August 2010

    a variety of support for mentor teachers and their first-year teachers. Monthly training

    classes are conducted for new teachers and their mentors.

    In-Building Instructional Facilitators: CPSD historically has funded at least one

    "Instructional Facilitator" in every school (two in every high school, one full time and

    one half time in every middle school and one in every elementary school). There are 31

    master teachers working as Instructional Facilitators. The Instructional Facilitator is the

    resident "mentor teacher" in each school.

    Tacoma School District: Tacoma Public Schools believes that new and veteran teachers require

    help, guidance and mentoring to achieve great success in the classroom. The Teacher Support

    System includes:

    New teacher orientation and seminars: These sessions provide information concerning

    district programs, curriculum, as well as district policies and procedures.

    New Teacher Mentor Program: This program is designed to help first and second year

    teachers succeed during a critical time in the professional development. This program

    involves intense mentoring, monthly meetings, classroom observations and a variety of

    support for mentor teachers and the beginning teachers. Funding is available to

    support the program through stipends; professional development sessions are a part ofthe program framework and include school principals. A district program facilitator

    supervises the program under the leadership of the Director of Professional and

    Organizational Development.

    Instructional facilitators, in some buildings, are assigned to provide continuous

    improvement in classroom instruction by providing instructional support to teachers in

    areas of lesson design, classroom assessment and classroom management.

    Alternative Route interns will be assigned to a specific mentor teacher for intense

    classroom mentoring until such time that the candidate demonstrates competency

    necessary to lead the classroom with less intensive supervision from the mentor.

    C. Route 1 and Route 2 Placements

    Route 1 and 2 candidates are defined as follows:

    Route 1: Alternative Route programs for classified staff (i.e. paraprofessionals) that hold atransferable Associate of Arts or Science degree.

    Route 2: Alternative Route programs for currently employed classified staff (i.e. paraprofessionals)that hold a minimum of a Bachelor of Arts or Science degree from a regionally accredited collegeor university.

    For programs offering Route 1 and 2, the Alternative Route programs and district partners will provideverification that they actively pursue means and make every effort to ensure that paraprofessionals enrolledas interns in the alternative route program retain their employment during their mentored internship. (Forexample, para-professionals may take on increased teaching responsibility in the classroom in which theyare assigned while the mentor teacher serves in a supervisory/supportive role).

    The STAR program is designed to enroll candidates for Routes 2, 3, and 4. For the Route 2

    candidates, the Director of the program works with the appropriate individuals within the

    district, usually involving the Director of Human Resources and building administrators, to

    ensure that paraprofessionals are able to continue their employment while placed in their year-

    long internship. This has been successfully implemented with previous Route 2 candidates.

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    9/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 9 of 39August 2010

    Typically, the process involves a written letter of understanding that specifies the commitments

    of the district and the university. Items contained in the agreement include such things as the

    identification of the classroom in which the candidate is to be placed, the number of hours

    weekly for which the paraprofessional salary will be paid (often, the individual is less than full

    time), the support from the mentor, the support from university supervisor, and any related

    items.

    As we move toward more internship experiences involving the co-teaching model, we believe

    the Route 2 candidates are excellent prospects for this type of agreement. The co-teaching

    model enables the candidate to have varying levels of engagement in instruction with the

    mentor involved in a variety of ways that support the candidates learning of how to

    implements teaching strategies and support student learning at a high level.

    D. Selection of a Mentor teacher

    The Mentor teacher(s) shall be defined as the teacher(s) of record in theclassroom(s) where the Alternative Route candidate is placed. The program and district may also assign acontent teacher in addition to the classroom Mentor teacher(s) to address candidate needs in specificcontent areas.

    Selection of mentor teachers will be conducted to ensure that the requirements of the RFP are met. Where possible,

    procedures established by the university and the participating districts for the selection of mentor teachers will be

    honored. However, if a conflict with grant requirements arises, the grant requirements will take precedence.

    The districts and the program provider provide the following assurances that the district supports and agrees to the

    following criteria for a teacher to be selected as a Mentor teacher:

    1. Evidence that the Mentor teacher has had a minimum of three years teaching experience andholds a continuing or professional certificate;

    The University will verify that the mentor teacher has the requisite certificate. Should anoccasion arise in which this is not possible (such as the rare case in a small school with no

    teacher in the subject with such qualifications) the university will arrange for another teacher

    who meets the qualifications to serve as a second mentor. This would only be expected to occur

    with Route 2 or Route 4 candidates.

    2. Evidence that the Mentor teacher has completed formalized Mentor training either through district,private organizations or institutions, university, OSPI mentor academies, or through onlinemodules;

    The university will verify that the mentor teacher has completed formalized mentor training. If

    the mentor teacher has not, then we will ensure that the mentor participates in such training

    including making provisions for mentor training to be offered by the university. The universityhas provided mentor training to mentors in past cohorts, basing the training on the training

    provided by OSPI mentor academies.

    3. A letter of recommendation from the Mentor teachers Principal or other District designee thatnominates them for Mentor teacher designation for a yearlong Alternative Route candidateplacement;

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    10/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 10 of 39August 2010

    Standard placement procedures for candidates involve the principal in the selection process. As

    a part of this process, we will formalize that practice by ensuring that the principal writes a

    letter recommending the mentor teacher for the mentorship position, and that the letter will

    also specify the mentor meets the eligibility requirements.

    4. District plan for providing significant time for Mentor teachers to spend with alternative routeteacher candidates throughout their internship. Partnerships must provide each candidate withintensive classroom mentoring until such time that the candidate demonstrates competencynecessary to manage the classroom with less intensive supervision from the Mentor teacher;

    As referenced in the Classroom Placement section of the proposal, extensive mentoring support

    will be provided to each candidate.

    Examples of Individual District Commitment to Mentoring

    Clover Park School District: CPSD recognizes that new and even seasoned teachers require

    help, guidance and mentoring to achieve great success in the classroom. CPSD also recognizes

    that a single approach to providing assistance and help to teachers is insufficient to the task of

    ensuring the success of our teachers. Too much rests on the quality of teachers to put anythingless than a quality support system in place to assist teachers in the mission of teaching our

    children what they need to know to succeed and contribute to their community. The CPSD

    Teacher Support System includes:

    Mentor Teacher Program Manager: The Mentor Teacher Program Manager works withan advisory team (representatives from the teachers association and several local

    colleges and universities) to ensure that only the best teachers are selected to mentor

    student teachers or new first-year teachers.

    New Teacher Mentor Program: This program is designed to help first-year teachers

    succeed during a critical period in their professional development. The program

    involves intense mentoring, requires monthly meetings and classroom observations and

    a variety of support for mentor teachers and their first-year teachers. Monthly trainingclasses are conducted for new teachers and their mentors.

    In-Building Instructional Facilitators: CPSD historically has funded at least one

    "Instructional Facilitator" in every school (two in every high school, one full time and

    one half time in every middle school and one in every elementary school). There are 31

    master teachers working as Instructional Facilitators. The Instructional Facilitator is the

    resident "mentor teacher" in each school.

    Tacoma School District: Tacoma Public Schools believes that new and veteran teachers require

    help, guidance and mentoring to achieve great success in the classroom. The Teacher Support

    System includes:

    New teacher orientation and seminars: These sessions provide information concerning

    district programs, curriculum, as well as district policies and procedures.

    New Teacher Mentor Program: This program is designed to help first and second year

    teachers succeed during a critical time in the professional development. This program

    involves intense mentoring, monthly meetings, classroom observations and a variety of

    support for mentor teachers and the beginning teachers. Funding is available to

    support the program through stipends; professional development sessions are a part of

    the program framework and include school principals. A district program facilitator

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    11/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 11 of 39August 2010

    supervises the program under the leadership of the Director of Professional and

    Organizational Development. Instructional facilitators, in some buildings, are assigned to provide continuous

    improvement in classroom instruction by providing instructional support to teachers in

    areas of lesson design, classroom assessment and classroom management.

    Alternative Route interns will be assigned to a specific mentor teacher for intense

    classroom mentoring until such time that the candidate demonstrates competency

    necessary to lead the classroom with less intensive supervision from the mentor.

    5. District acknowledgement that Alternative Route 4 candidates are eligible to be hired as theteacher of record and are considered Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT) under Federal No Child LeftBehind (NCLB) regulations. (See Appendix C for Teacher Candidates Enrolled in Alternative Routeto Certification Programs and Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT) Requirements).

    As a HQT, the Alternative Route 4 candidate will be assigned to their own classroom and a mentorteacher from the district will be assigned to the candidate. The district shall assure that the mentorteacher and the candidate have adequate time to meet during the course of the school year andthat all requirements for the selection of the Mentor teacher for Alternative Route 4 candidates willbe the same as any other Alternative Route candidate.

    District commitment letters are included in the Appendix.

    E. Field Experience Placements

    1. Determining Placements:The applicant shall describe the process by which placementswill be made. Program personnel who are authorized to request a placement and the districtpersonnel to whom the requests should be made shall be clearly identified. The agreementshould also specify that candidates will not be placed in situations in which personal relationships

    or previous experiences could interfere with objective evaluation. Alternative Route candidatesshall be placed with a Mentor teacher who meets the criteria as defined in Section D above,titledSelection of a Mentor teacher.

    Internship Application: For Route 2-4 alternative route programs, candidates would need to

    complete the internship application along with their application to the program. The internship

    application provides information for the school districts to make an appropriate placement. As

    part of the internship application, all candidates will submit a portfolio of evidence/application

    materials indicating they have sufficient knowledge/skills to begin the internship year

    experience. The portfolio includes, but is not limited to: academic preparation page, letter of

    introduction to principal and cooperating teacher, video tape of a previous teaching

    presentation (required in various methods course practicum), current WSP/FBI Fingerprint

    background check with OSPI on file, passed WEST-E exams, completed endorsementpaperwork, cumulative 3.0 or better GPA, with core classes each with a 2.0 or better.

    The program Director, Dr. Ann Gentle, will make placement requests with the assistance of the

    SMU Placement Officer, Faye Barnes. Among the stipulations regarding placement in the

    personal affidavit signed on the student teaching application are the following requirements.

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    12/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 12 of 39August 2010

    2. Background check and fingerprinting: Prior to the beginning of all field experiencesthe program will verify that candidates have cleared fingerprint and background checks conductedthrough the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction and that the program is responsiblefor assuring that the appropriate clearance remains in effect throughout the completion of anyassigned field experience.

    Prior to a candidate being allowed to be placed into a school for any internship or practicum

    experience, the university requires that the candidate has cleared fingerprint and background

    checks conducted through the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Candidaterecords are monitored to ensure that the clearance is up to date throughout the program until

    the application for certification is submitted.

    3. Brief description of the field experiences covered by the agreement:Thissection should outline the nature of the field experiences being requested and covered by theagreement. For Alternative Route candidates the basic premise is that they will be in a yearlongmentored internship with the open exit option after one half school year if the candidate hasdemonstrated that they have met competencies for certification.

    Each candidate is placed in a full-year field experience. Approximately the first eight to twelve

    weeks of the experience is considered to be practicum experience. This is an important concept

    for the candidate and the mentor to adhere to. The practicum experience allows for the

    application of concepts included in the intensive summer academy. The faculty members from

    the university can monitor those activities to ensure that the concepts are being applied

    appropriately, and to ensure that adjustments are made as needed. This process is critical to

    the success of the condensed format for the summer academy, which assumes the early stages

    of the field experience will be utilized for those experiences.

    During this phase, the candidate begins with acclimation to the classroom and school and

    engages in a variety of activities. The candidate begins with observations, but rather quickly

    transitions into a role of assisting the teacher with individual students and small groups of

    students, as well as providing limited instruction under the mentors direct supervision. Since

    the grant requires a minimum of one half year of internship, the candidate does not take full

    responsibility for the classroom until after this period is completed.

    Once the candidate has been involved in the classroom for the initial period she or he enters

    into the formal period traditionally associated with student teaching. This is done after the

    mentor teacher and university supervisor have completed formal observations of the candidate

    and are in agreement that the candidate is ready to assume full responsibility for the classroom

    with the appropriate oversight by the mentor and university supervisor (soloing).

    I understand that I am not guaranteed placement in a particular school district, school building; or with

    a particular mentor teacher, university supervisor; and that final acceptance of a student teacher is the

    prerogative of the school district. I understand that I am not to make arrangements with any school

    district or school personnel regarding my placement, and in accordance to WAC code, not be placed for

    Teacher Candidate Internship in the school or district where I graduated from. I understand I may not

    intern in the same building where a spouse/family member/friend is employed. . . . I will be prepared to

    go where Saint Martins University is able to secure a Teacher Candidate Internship position.

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    13/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 13 of 39August 2010

    During the period of soloing, the mentor provides support to the candidate, often reviewing

    lesson plans, providing suggestions and other feedback. Generally the candidate assumes the

    responsibility for the class for a minimum of 8 weeks, but the mentor and the university

    supervisor are available as resources and periodically observe to make sure all is going well and

    to provide that support that is needed for success.

    4. Roles, responsibilities, and expectations: A description ofthe roles, responsibilities,and expectations for: (1) candidates (2) supervisors and (3) mentor teachers shall be developedand shared between partners. In cases where programs have developed handbooks or othermaterials containing this information, those materials shall be reviewed by the program and thedistrict. The program shall provide evidence that they have communicated the expectations todistrict Mentor teachers.

    Roles, responsibilities and expectations have been established and are included in the Student

    teacher handbook. Each Candidate, mentor teacher, responsible building administrator, and

    university supervisor is provided with a copy of the Student Teaching Handbook.

    http://www.stmartin.edu/education/Documents/StudentTeachingHandbook/2010/TeacherCandidateHandbook-Dec2010.pdf Those roles, responsibilities and expectations are discussed in

    the initial team meetings and reviewed as appropriate throughout the experience.

    5. Other provisions: Districts and programs may mutually agree to include other provisions inaddition to those listed above governing field experiences. For PESB guidelines for fieldplacement agreements go tohttp://sites.google.com/a/pesb.wa.gov/home/prepprogram.

    Agreements include no other provisions not already addressed in other sections.

    F. Program Design

    Provide program design information for each alternative route(s) the partnership program intends to offer

    including:

    1. A detailed description of how the routes will be structured and operated by the partnership.

    The program is designed to enroll students through three of the four identified routes. Those

    routes are:

    Route 2: currently employed classified staff with a baccalaureate degree, or higher, seeking

    residency certification in subject matter shortage areas, and areas with shortages due to geographic

    location. Interns will complete a year-long or less mentored internship. Candidates in this route

    will earn a minimum of two endorsements with at least one in a subject matter shortage area,

    and/or geographic location shortage area. Interns will attend an intensive summer teaching

    academy followed by the yearlong or less mentored internship.

    Route 3: individuals who are not currently employed in the district, who hold a baccalaureate

    degree or higher and can document a minimum of one year of professional experience. Candidates

    in this route will earn a minimum of two endorsements with at least one in a subject matter

    shortage area, and/or geographic location shortage area. Interns will attend an intensive summer

    teaching academy followed by the year-long or less mentored internship.

    http://www.stmartin.edu/education/Documents/StudentTeachingHandbook/2010/TeacherCandidateHandbook-Dec2010.pdfhttp://www.stmartin.edu/education/Documents/StudentTeachingHandbook/2010/TeacherCandidateHandbook-Dec2010.pdfhttp://www.stmartin.edu/education/Documents/StudentTeachingHandbook/2010/TeacherCandidateHandbook-Dec2010.pdfhttp://sites.google.com/a/pesb.wa.gov/home/prepprogramhttp://sites.google.com/a/pesb.wa.gov/home/prepprogramhttp://sites.google.com/a/pesb.wa.gov/home/prepprogramhttp://sites.google.com/a/pesb.wa.gov/home/prepprogramhttp://www.stmartin.edu/education/Documents/StudentTeachingHandbook/2010/TeacherCandidateHandbook-Dec2010.pdfhttp://www.stmartin.edu/education/Documents/StudentTeachingHandbook/2010/TeacherCandidateHandbook-Dec2010.pdf
  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    14/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 14 of 39August 2010

    Route 4: individuals teaching with conditional or emergency substitute certificates, who hold a

    baccalaureate degree or higher. Candidates in this route will earn a minimum of two endorsements

    with at least one in a subject matter shortage area, and/or geographic location shortage area.

    Interns will attend an intensive summer teaching academy followed by the year-long or less

    mentored internship.

    For all routes candidates will be expected to pursue endorsement in one or more of the stateidentified shortage areas: Special Education, English as a Second Language, Chemistry, Science,

    Mathematics, Middle Level Math/Science, Early Childhood Special Education, Biology, (Physics, or

    Earth Science with cooperative arrangements with another recommending institution).

    2. Description of the screening process for applicants to alternative route programs, including entry requirementsspecific to each route, advising and assessment of candidates previous work experience. (Appendix A containsa detailed description of the eligibility criteria and entry requirements for each of the four routes).

    Eligibility and entry requirements: Saint Martins University will ensure compliance with the

    eligibility criteria and entry requirements, as established at Appendix A of the RFP and this

    application. All eligibility and entry requirements will be part of the application procedureestablished for all candidates.

    Districts have committed to providing a well qualified mentor teacher for each candidate. Specific

    criteria for acceptance/placement of candidates, as well as any additional district funding/support

    will be determined by the districts, in consultation with the STAR Program Director to ensure that

    all requirements of the grant are met.

    In addition to the eligibility and entry requirements specified in the RFP, Saint Martins University

    Education Division will also utilize the same application standards currently in effect for all students:

    Application requirements for Saint Martins University education programs:

    Earned C or better in a series of pre-professional courses, including: English I, English II,speech or theater, college level mathematics, introduction to psychology, human

    development, computer literacy, intercultural communication, introduction to education.

    All students must complete an on-site essay to assess basic writing and communication

    skills, as well as content.

    State, University, and Division forms including the Character and Fitness form

    Three Letters of Recommendation

    Cumulative grade point average of 3.0 or better on a 4.0 scale or a recent full semester of

    an earned 3.0 or better GPA. The 3.0 GPA must be maintained to qualify for student

    teaching.

    Successful passing of all three sections (reading, writing, math) of the WEST-B exam

    Successful passing of all WEST-E exams An interview with program personnel

    For those wishing to also earn the Masters in Teaching degree, the GRE or MAT is required.

    The screening process for applicants will include the entry requirements for the STAR Program, as

    detailed in Appendix A of the Request for Proposal (see appendices).

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    15/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 15 of 39August 2010

    Initial Screening: The Partnership will utilize several screening opportunities: Saint Martins

    University will provide initial screening to determine eligibility of the candidate for the program

    (e.g., Bachelors degree from an accredited college/university for Routes 2-4; a minimum of one

    year ofwork experience, etc.). Saint Martins will then provide application materials for each

    candidate and review all applications for completeness. A Selection Committee representing Saint

    Martins University faculty and staff and school district personnel will then rank order the

    candidates based on potential for success, endorsement areas, and long and short range goals.

    Saint Martins University faculty members believe that screening also needs to be a continuous

    process throughout the candidates programs. Screening, therefore, will also include the following:

    Final Acceptance Interview: All applicants must attend a Final Acceptance Interview, where they

    are evaluated for the program. The evaluation covers all the application materials, including on-site

    essay and program planning. In addition, the evaluation rates the applicants on the following: clear

    goals, professional impression, logical responses, voice and speech, punctuality, and listening skills.

    Test scores, recommendations, personal statement, past grades and an overall rating are also used

    to determine acceptance to the program.

    Staffing: Staffing is a screening process throughout the students educational program. The

    purpose of Staffing is to determine appropriate advising, if any, with regards to the students grades

    and/or professional dispositions. Any faculty member of the education division may recommend

    Staffing for an individual student and any faculty who has had contact with the particular student

    may give input. As appropriate, a faculty representative discusses the situation with the student

    and advises remedial actions. It is the desire of the education division faculty to promote and

    encourage the professional growth of all its students. However, if needed, the Staffing Advisor will

    counsel the student into a different career choice. The student is asked to sign the Staffing Record,

    indicating they were informed of the Staffing and the results.

    Internship Application: For Route 2-4 alternative route programs, candidates would need to

    complete the internship application along with their application to the program. The internshipapplication provides information for the school districts to make an appropriate placement. As part

    of the internship application, all candidates will submit a portfolio of evidence/application materials

    indicating they have sufficient knowledge/skills to begin the internship year experience. The

    portfolio includes, but is not limited to: academic preparation page, letter of introduction to

    principal and cooperating teacher, video tape of a previous teaching presentation (required in

    various methods course practicum), current WSP/FBI Fingerprint background check with OSPI on

    file, passed WEST-E exams, completed endorsement paperwork, cumulative 3.0 or better GPA, with

    core classes each with a 2.0 or better.

    Internship Experience: The university supervisor, classroom mentor teacher and (frequently) the

    building principal evaluate the candidate throughout the experience. If, at any time, this team

    assesses the candidate as not meeting expectations/standards, the Chair of Field Experience is

    notified of the situation. The Chair then conducts an Intervention (problem solving, one-on-one

    mentoring/tutoring). If needed, the student is pulled from the program and is typically placed in

    an intensive directed practicum for the remainder of the semester. The student may re-apply for a

    second internship experience the following semester in one of our regular programs.

    3. Teacher Development Plans- - Each Alternative Route program will provide a detailed description ofhow they will specify the alternative route coursework and training required of each candidate by

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    16/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 16 of 39August 2010

    comparing the candidate's prior experience and coursework with the state's new performance-basedstandards for residency certification and adjusting any requirements accordingly. The program will alsoprovide a description of the open exit option available to candidates in Routes 2, 3 and 4 (Appendix Bcontains desired components of a teacher development plan).

    Identification of Endorsements to be earned: All candidates will receive intensive, one-on-one

    transcript analysis to determine and identify the endorsements to be earned. According to Saint

    Martins policy, all candidates will be required to earn a minimum of 2 performance-based

    endorsementsthe first endorsement (usually in the area of the candidates Bachelors degree),

    and a second endorsement. All candidates will have the opportunity to earn a Middle Level

    endorsement either the Middle Level Math, Middle Level Science, or Middle Level Humanities. All

    candidates will earn at least one endorsement in a subject or geographic shortage area. All

    candidates will receive counseling as to the supply and demand needs for endorsements in the

    state. Candidates, as part of the application process, write an essay on their career goals. Advisors

    will use this as an additional tool to discuss possible future add-on endorsements to be earned by

    the candidates. Endorsements in Special Education, Teaching English Language Learners, Bilingual

    Education, Math, Chemistry, and/or Science are endorsements which will be specifically

    encouraged.

    Change of career candidates: The Partnership will also actively recruit individuals seeking a change

    of career. These individuals (many rich in backgrounds in science, math, and/or computer skills) will

    be retiring and/or let go from businesses/government offices/military in the process of

    downsizing. The Partnership, located in the South Sound area, is geographically located close to the

    homes of many of these individuals thus encouraging participation in the program.

    Performance-based format: Candidates will incorporate all learning opportunities as performance-

    based knowledge/skills experiences. All learning opportunities for this internship year will be

    provided during the late afternoons after school, evenings, and Saturdays (as needed) and/or

    during the summer (intensive foundations academy). Students will receive individualized

    assessment of required knowledge/skills prior to the start of the program. Waivers andsubstitutions, based on appropriate documentation, will be awarded for previous coursework and

    life experiences. Remaining required knowledge/skills will be obtained through seminars and

    modules of formalized learning opportunities in field-based settings. Candidates will earn credits in

    three ways: 1) through regular course enrollment during the summer, fall, and spring, 2) through

    modular learning opportunities throughout the program year, and 3) through credit earned by

    evaluation of documentation of previous life or work experience.

    On-site Formalized Learning Opportunities: Learning experiences will be offered at locations within

    driving distance to the candidates. The university and/or Partner districts will provide location(s)

    for the learning opportunities. Specific location of the learning opportunities will be determined by

    program and student needs/classroom locations. Candidates and instructors will meet on a pre-

    scheduled basis to capitalize on the opportunity for discussion/development of the classroom

    application of knowledge and skills. Those students who have already had the particular

    knowledge/skills waived for the scheduled learning opportunity will not be required to attend that

    seminar/module.

    Individual academic counseling: All candidates accepted to the program will have one-on-one

    transcript and life experience counseling with a Saint Martins University faculty member. The

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    17/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 17 of 39August 2010

    counseling will include a detailed program planning for the duration of the candidates program.

    The counseling will also include an evaluation of transcripts for options for additional optional

    endorsements. Candidates will be informed as to the procedure and requirements for course

    waivers (based on previous life/work experiences) and for course substitutions (for courses

    transferred for other colleges/universities).

    Waivers for courses based on previous life/work experiences will be granted upon approval of

    appropriate documentation, including, but not limited to:

    Letters of support from principals, teachers, faculty

    Samples of work products documenting appropriate knowledge/skills (e.g., lesson plans,

    samples of student work, samples of candidate responses to student work, etc. for

    paraprofessionals; samples of computer applications; etc.)

    Samples of work evaluations pertaining to other appropriate knowledge/skills (e.g.,leadership, ability to communicate in writing, ability to get along with others, etc.)

    Video-tape of candidate teaching K-12 students

    Partial waivers are also possible. Candidates may waive a portion of a course based on appropriate

    documentation, but may still need to complete a portion of the knowledge/skills. The formalizedlearning opportunities will be designed to allow candidates to attend only those seminars/modules

    needed in order to complete the required knowledge/skills.

    Early (Open) Exit: The candidate may request an Early Exit from Student Teaching at any point after

    year of internship. Approval will be granted upon positive evaluation of the Performance-based

    Pedagogy Assessment Rubric (TPA if implemented) by the classroom mentor teacher and university

    supervisor. All criteria must have been evaluated at the Met level; documentation for Positive

    Impact on Student Learning, the Comprehensive Instructional Plan portfolio, the Family

    involvement Plan, Professional Growth plan, and all other portfolio requirements must be

    completed and approved; and the candidates Final Reflection must be submitted to the supervisor.

    For all alternative routes, candidates would be able to complete the internship once thebenchmarks have all been Met on the Performance-based Pedagogy Assessment Rubric. The

    classroom mentor teacher, university supervisor, and internship seminar instructor would all need

    to approve the Early (Open) Exit.

    4. Strategies for recruiting candidates from under represented populations.

    Marketing and recruitment efforts for the STAR program will include encouragement for candidates of

    color to apply. Evening information sessions will allow candidates of color to attend and learn about

    the program. Saint Martins University currently enrolls 38% students of color and the Education

    Division enrolls 18% well above the national average of 12% minority teachers and also above thestate average of 14% minority teachers. The Saint Martins alternative route program has averaged

    13.5% minority candidates to complete the program from 2002-2003 to the current year. Participants

    in the current (2010-2011) program include 14.3% minorities.

    Completed Candidates in the Alternative Route Program Saint Martins University (includes those

    receiving the conditional loan scholarships:

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    18/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 18 of 39August 2010

    Year # White

    Candidates

    # Other Ethnic

    Candidates

    Total #

    Candidates

    % Minority

    Candidates

    2002-2003 13 5 18 27.8%

    2003-2004 14 0 14 0.0%

    2004-2005 13 3 16 18.75%

    2005-2006 13 0 13 0.0%

    2006-2007 13 2 15 13.3%

    2007-2008 17 3 20 15.0%

    2008-2009 18 3 21 14.3%

    2009-2010 22 3 25 12.0%

    2010-

    2011*

    12 2 14 14.3%

    Total

    2002-2011

    135 21 156 13.5%

    *Currently enrolled students expected to complete.

    Specific recruitment and retention strategies include:

    A. Minority teachers/alumni will be requested to be on the PEAB. The alumni will help us

    market, recruit, and retain minority students. Alternative route minority alumni will be

    specifically recruited for the PEAB.

    B. Alternative route minority alumni will be also be recruited as additional supportmentor/buddies for current minority candidates. Alumni who have been successful in the

    alternative route program will share their wisdom and success strategies to current

    candidates.

    C. Minority alternative route students will be asked to participate in Saint Martins recruiting

    events,

    D. Financial Aid, Student Accounts, Registrar and other University offices are well attuned to

    the needs of individual students. With all application materials otherwise considered

    equal, candidates of color will be given preference for acceptance to the program.

    E. Districts in the partnership will, in particular, encourage classified staff and conditional/emergency substitute teachers of color to apply to the program.

    5. The number of interns the partnership intends to enroll in each route.

    Of the total of 25 anticipated candidates in the program per year, it is anticipated that 3 will be

    Route 2, 20 will be Route 3, and 2 will be Route 4 candidates. These numbers do not represent

    allocation of slots to the Routes, but rather an estimate of the distribution that will occur.

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    19/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 19 of 39August 2010

    6. Include a description of the components of the formal mentored internship leading to the ResidencyCertificate.

    A. Full-time classroom assignment: candidates will be placed in a full-time internship position,

    starting with full-time mentoring and progressing to increasingly less intensive monitoring

    and assistance as the intern demonstrates the skills necessary to take over the classroomwith less intensive support. The intensive mentorship will be scheduled for a full year with

    a minimum of one-half of a school year, with the additional time as necessary.

    B. Identification of performance indicators: Performance indicators based on the knowledge

    and skills standards required for residency certification by the state board of education are

    included on the university web site at

    http://www.stmartin.edu/education/Documents/WACProgramAlignmentCharts.pdf . Each

    student will also be provided with charts indicating the alignment of their courses and the

    Washington Administrative Codes and program Best Practices. An evaluation rubric will be

    used to assess both. The student will also be provided a chart of performance-based items

    he/she will need to prepare prior to certification. This portfolio is prepared/finalized during

    student teaching/internship.

    C. Identification of benchmarks: Benchmarks will indicate when the standard is met for all

    performance indicators. The Performance-based Pedagogy Assessment Rubric (TPA, if

    implemented) will be used to determine that the Met benchmark has been attained.

    Criterion assessed as met, but still indicating possible improvement in the Professional

    Growth Plan are the areas the candidate should work on for additional knowledge/skills

    during the Professional Certification program.

    D. Description of strategies for assessing candidate performance on the benchmarks will

    indicate when the standard is met for each/all performance indicators: Candidates will be

    evaluated against the Pedagogy Assessment Rubric (TPA, if implemented)on a regular basis

    during their internship (at least once during the first half-year, and at least two more times

    the second half-year) by the classroom mentor teacher and the university supervisor. All

    Standards must be assessed at the Met level for the intern to be deemed eligible for EarlyExit. Students may apply for Early Exit at any time after a half-year internship has been

    completed. All Standards, endorsement competencies, and coursework knowledge/skills

    must be evaluated as being met/completed/on target.

    E. Identification of one or more tools to be used to assess a candidates performance after

    about one-half year: All candidates will be evaluated against the Pedagogy Assessment

    Rubric (TPA, if implemented); all endorsement competencies will need to have been Met;

    WEST-B and WEST-E tests taken and passed. The Classroom Learning Instructional Plan,

    Positive Impact Plan, Family Involvement Plan, Professional Growth Plan, and Personal

    Reflective paper must all be in at least draft stage. The Pedagogical Assessment

    Observation will be completed by both the mentor teacher and university supervisor at

    least once.F. Prior to recommendation for certification, the following will also need to be complete and

    approved by the certification officer, the placement officer, and/or the Dean: a) all final

    certification paperwork, including endorsement forms; b) development of a Placement File,

    including all pertinent components; c) payment of certification/placement file fees.

    http://www.stmartin.edu/education/Documents/WACProgramAlignmentCharts.pdfhttp://www.stmartin.edu/education/Documents/WACProgramAlignmentCharts.pdfhttp://www.stmartin.edu/education/Documents/WACProgramAlignmentCharts.pdf
  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    20/39

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    21/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 21 of 39August 2010

    2. Anticipated student-faculty ratio:

    Each class will be limited to 25 students. The maximum FTE student to faculty ratio is 13.3.

    3. Describe previous experience in offering programs of this type

    Saint Martins University has been offering the program since 2002. Program evaluations have

    been quite positive and employment rates for graduates of the program have been very high.

    Administrators of the schools in which interns have been placed have provided favorable

    evaluations of the candidates, frequently complimenting them as having been particularly well-

    prepared, and successful. Additionally, administrators hiring the graduates have consistently

    report satisfaction, citing the extent of the content knowledge, maturity, and teaching skill of

    the graduates.

    However, the words of one of the STAR program candidates from 2003-2004 tells it so muchmore emphatically. In writing about his recent completion of his principals credential, he

    provided the following observation to our great pleasure:

    Most importantly however, I would like you to know that my achievements have been

    built upon the solid educational foundations found at Saint Martin's University. More

    succinctly, the program courses involving lesson planning, classroom management,

    instructional practices, observations, practicums, etc. were in my opinion so closely

    related to my employment experience that the gap between theory and actual practice

    was virtually non-existent.

    I have since had the opportunity to officially mentor many new and experienced

    teachers in the improvement of classroom instructional practices, and have found that

    my certification experience is somewhat dissimilar to that of mentees and colleagues

    from other educational institutions across the nation. As such, it is to your credit that I

    write this note of acknowledgment for the positive impact you are having with students

    and schools in the field of education, and with deep appreciation to have

    experienced such an enriching, valuable, and worthwhile program found at Saint

    Martin's University.

    4. Signed Memorandum of Understanding (see Attachment A) outlining assurance of WEST-B and WEST-Etesting requirements for candidates entering the Alternative Route program and Alternative RoutesEnrollment Table and recruitment website commitments (required for PESB approval).

    The signed Memorandum of Understanding is attached to the proposal.

    H. Program Delivery

    1. Cost for candidates (Alternative Route programs must be packaged priced to reflect lower cost percandidate price than traditional programs)

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    22/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 22 of 39August 2010

    The program is provided at a substantial reduction to the basic tuition rate charged to students

    enrolled in the regular program. The table following this outlines the comparative costs. For

    those candidates pursuing the MIT degree, the costs are broken down into the cost for the first

    year which leads to certification as well as for the total cost to earn the MIT at the end of the

    second year.

    Certification Only MIT

    a. Cost for Alternative Route $16,230 $13,040 to cert

    $21,410 to MIT

    b. If applicable: Cost for

    Traditional Route

    $32,937 $27, 436 to cert

    $38,406 to MIT

    2. Length of program 11 Months to certification, MIT typically takes about 24 months total

    3. Projected start date June 20, 2011

    4. Projected enrollment 25 per year

    5. Location(s) Saint Martins University

    5300 Pacific Avenue

    Lacey, WA 98503

    And

    Selected school district schools

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    23/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 23 of 39August 2010

    Section 4- Contact Information

    Name: Roy Heynderickx, Ph.D.Title: PresidentAddress: 5300 Pacific Avenue, SE Lacey, WA 98503Telephone: 360-438-4307

    Fax: 360-438-4340Email: [email protected]

    March 10, 2011Chief Academic Officer, Date

    ESD Superintendent,Organization President orequivalent official

    Name: Joyce Westgard, Ed.D.Title: Dean, College of Education and Professional Psychology

    Address: 5300 Pacific Avenue, SE Lacey, WA 98503Telephone: 360-438-4333Fax: 360-438-4486Email: [email protected]

    Dean, Director ofDegree/Certification Unit Dateor equivalent official

    Name: See attached letters

    Title:Address:Telephone:Fax:Email:

    Endorsement by Superintendent of School District Dateor equivalent official

    Name:Title:Address:

    Telephone:Fax:Email:

    Endorsement by Superintendent of School District Dateor equivalent official

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    24/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 24 of 39August 2010

    Name:Title:Address:Telephone:Fax:

    Email:

    Endorsement by Superintendent of School District Dateor equivalent official

    Name:Title:Address:Telephone:Fax:Email:

    Endorsement by Superintendent of School District Dateor equivalent official

    Name:Title:Address:Telephone:Fax:Email:

    Endorsement by Superintendent of School District Dateor equivalent official

    Resources:Educational Benchmarking EBI; Teacher Education Exit Study; SMC Alternative Route; 2003

    Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction; Washington State; Educator Supply and Demand inWashington State 2006 Report; Spring 2007

    Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction; Washington State;http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us 2009

    information

    Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Marna Miller; Alternative Routes to Teacher Certification inWashington State: Final Report and Appendices; December 2004

    http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/
  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    25/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 25 of 39August 2010

    MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDINGBetween

    PROFESSIONAL EDUCATOR STANDARDS BOARDAnd

    Name of Organization: Saint Martins University

    Organization type

    Four-year public college or universityX Four-year independent college or university

    Community College Other public agency (ESD, School District)

    Private non-profit organization Private for-profit organization

    Memorandum of Understanding: Agreement between the Professional Educator StandardsBoard (PESB) and Saint Martins University regarding the exchange of informationrequired by the Alternative Routes to Certification Program Approval.

    Purpose of Agreement: The purpose of this agreement is to specify reporting requirements ofAlternative Routes programs approved by PESB to offer teacher and or principal preparationprograms.Period of Performance: The Agreement becomes effective the date of signature and remainsin effect until modified or cancelled by either party.Confidential Information: The term confidential information as used in this Agreementmeans any and all information provided by Saint Martins University to PESB, staff,officers, and independent contractors which is exempt from mandatory disclosure under theterms of the state public disclosure laws codified at chapter 42.56 RCW. The term confidentialinformation includes, but is not limited to:

    1. Any personally identifiable student or staff-related information, including, but not limitedto (a) staff/student names, (b) the name of a staff/students parent or other family

    members, (c) staff/student addresses, (d) the address of a staff/students family, (e)personal identifiers such as a social security number or student number orstaff/certification number, (f) personal characteristics that would make a staff/studentsidentity easily traceable, (g) any combination of information that would make astaff/students identity easily traceable, (h) test results for schools and districts whichtest fewer than ten students in a grade level, and (i) any other personally identifiableinformation, or portrayal of staff/student related information in a personally identifiablemanner. (See, specifically, RCW 42.56.230(1) which exempts personal information infiles maintained for students in public schools from mandatory public disclosure; RCW42.56.070 (1) which exempts from mandatory public disclosure information specified incertain RCWs and other statute which exempts or prohibits disclosure such asthe federal FERPA statute at 20 U.S.C. section 1332g and its implementing regulationsat 34 CFR Part 99, which prohibit the unauthorized public disclosure and redisclosure ofpersonally identifiable student information in or from student education records; thestate ethics law at RCW 42.52.050(2) which prohibits state officers and employees fromdisclosing confidential information as defined above; and RCW 28A.655.090(7), thefewer than 10 students rule.)

    Description of Data: By reference, the information coded below is the complete list of datarequired by the PESB:

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    26/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 26 of 39August 2010

    As a requirement for recommendation of approval of an Alternative Route to Certificationprogram by the Professional Educator Standards Board (PESB), the program applicant agreesto provide the PESB with the following data and comply with the following requirements foroperating an Alternative Route to Certification program.

    1) Ensure that all candidates accepted into an approved Alternative Routes program have

    passed required WEST-B and WEST-E assessments as a requirement for admission toprogram.

    2) Provide PESB with all program information in a guided format suitable for inclusion onthe PESB recruitment websitewww.pathways.wa.gov.

    3) Provide the PESB with all candidate and Mentor teacher information in a guided formatsuitable for inclusion in the Alternative Routes Enrollment Table.

    Note: Information and guided formats are provided as an addendum to this Memorandum ofUnderstanding.

    Data will be made available to PESB in a manner agreed to by both parties on a scheduleagreed to by both parties. The PESB may amend this agreement by annually negotiatingadditional items of information to be included in this memorandum of understanding. Suchamendment will be in writing and signed by both parties. Amendments will specify the data, theconvention for entering the data, and the date of execution of the amendment. Unless amendedto include confidential information, data provided under this agreement shall be available perstate public disclosure laws codified in chapter 42.56 RCW. Confidential information shall onlybe requested for use in specific projects requiring that information to conduct research oranalysis. An amendment for including confidential information shall specify safeguards forinformation and redisclosure in compliance with all relevant federal and state laws.

    Unless specified by amendment, information received by PESB from Saint Martins University

    shall be analyzed by PESB solely for the purpose of developing policy guidance for the boardand information for the general public. Each party to this Agreement is entitled to display andshare information and analysis from this exchange.

    Parties to this agreement may request and receive publicly available data held by PESB, solong as the data has been determined as re-disclosable by the source of the data. PESB is nota data source, but negotiates release of other, publicly produced data.

    Redisclosure: Except as amended for confidential information, all data exchanged through thisagreement may be redisclosed by either party.

    No Guarantee of Accuracy and Non-Liability: Neither OSPI or PESB guarantee the accuracy

    of the data provided. All risk and liabilities of use and misuse of information by either partyprovided pursuant to this Agreement are understood and assumed.Termination: Either party may at its discretion disqualify at any time any person authorizedaccess to information by or pursuant to this Agreement. Notice of disqualification shall be in writingand shall terminate a disqualified persons access to any information provided by either partypursuant to this Agreement immediately upon delivery of the notice. Disqualification of one ormore persons by either party does not affect other persons authorized by or pursuant to thisAgreement.

    http://www.pathways.wa.gov/http://www.pathways.wa.gov/http://www.pathways.wa.gov/http://www.pathways.wa.gov/
  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    27/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 27 of 39August 2010

    Nondiscrimination: No individual shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefitsof, subjected to discrimination under, or denied employment in the administration of or inconnection with any program provided by this Agreement because of race, color, creed, maritalstatus, religion, sex, national origin, Vietnam era or disabled veterans status, age, the presenceof any sensory, mental or physical disability, or political affiliation or belief, provided that the

    prohibition against discrimination in employment because of disability shall not apply if theparticular disability prevents the individual from performing the essential functions of her or heremployment position, even with reasonable accommodation. The parties agree to abide by thestandards of responsibility toward the disabled as specified by the Americans with DisabilitiesAct and applicable state law. In the event that one of the parties hereto refuses to comply withthe above provision, this Agreement may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or inpart by the other party.

    Records Maintenance: The parties to this Agreement shall each maintain books, records,documents and other evidence which sufficiently and properly reflect all work activity Theserecords shall be subject to inspection, review or audit by personnel of both parties, otherpersonnel duly authorized by either party, the Office of the State Auditor, and federal officials so

    authorized by law. All books, records, documents, and other material relevant to thisAgreement will be retained for six years after expiration and the Office of the State Auditor,federal auditors, and any persons duly authorized by the parties shall have full access and theright to examine any of these materials during this period.

    Records and other documents, in any medium, furnished by one party to this Agreement to theother party, will remain the property of the furnishing party, unless otherwise agreed. Thereceiving party will not disclose or make available this material to any third parties without firstgiving notice to the furnishing party and giving it a reasonable opportunity to respond. Eachparty will utilize reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that records anddocuments provided by the other party are not erroneously disclosed to third parties.Responsibility for Acts and Omissions: Each party to this Agreement shall be responsible

    for any and all acts and omissions of its own staff, employees, officers, and agents acting withinthe score of their responsibilities.

    Contact information and signatures:Name: Roy Heynderickx, Ph.D.Title: PresidentAddress: 5300 Pacific Avenue, SE Lacey, WA 98503Telephone: 360-438-4307Fax: 360-438-4340Email: [email protected]

    March 10, 2011

    Chief Academic Officer, DateESD Superintendent,Organization President orequivalent official

    Name: Joyce Westgard, Ed.D.Title: Dean, College of Education and Professional Psychology

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    28/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 28 of 39August 2010

    Address: 5300 Pacific Avenue, SE Lacey, WA 98503Telephone: 360-438-4333Fax: 360-438-4486Email: [email protected]

    Dean, Director ofDegree/Certification Unit Dateor equivalent official

    Name:Title:Address:Telephone:Fax:Email:

    PESB Signature Authority Date

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    29/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 29 of 39August 2010

    Addendum: Memorandum of Understanding- Alternative Routes to Certification Application

    The following guided formats and information is provided:

    1) Ensure that all candidates accepted into an approved Alternative Routes program have passed required WEST-B and WEST-Eassessments as a requirement for admission to program. Required by RCW 28A.660.040

    2) Provide PESB with the following program information in a guided format suitable for inclusion on the PESB recruitment websitewww.pathways.wa.gov:

    Name of Institution Institution Logo

    Main Address

    Site Address

    Description of Program by Site

    Routes and Endorsements offered by site

    Web page url for site

    Candidate Quote

    Coordinator information for each siteo Nameo Phone Numbero Email

    3) Provide PESB with all candidate and Mentor teacher information in a guided format suitable for inclusion in the Alternative Route Enrollme

    Table. All PESB approved Alternative Route program(s) shall use the directions below for completing the MOU requirement of enteringcandidates into the Alternative Routes Enrollment Table.

    Directions for completing the Alternative Route Enrollment TableThe PESB Alternative Route Enrollment table is essentially an Excel Spreadsheet that you fill out online. It saves, backs up, and shares the datawith the appropriate people. There is more than one tab in the workbook, but we only need the first filled out, the other tabs populate bythemselves. The key for this project is to be exact about how the data is keyed into the table (computers are very literal, and will see Science andscience differently)

    http://www.pathways.wa.gov/http://www.pathways.wa.gov/http://www.pathways.wa.gov/
  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    30/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 30 of 39August 2010

    Security/Sharing - Your work on this page is automatically saved and can been seen by PESB and anyone on in your department that you wouldlike to grant access. Permissions are granted to your school email address and will require you creating a Google login and password using yourschool email. This allows us to quickly and efficiently manage permissions. Your Google account is yours, it can be used for PESB projects, oranything other project with any other people.

    Information Type Field Name Field Definition

    Name First First name of the enrolled student

    Name Last Last name of the enrolled student

    Contact Email Contact Email for the enrolled student

    Contact Phone Contact phone number for the enrolled student

    Program Academic Yearuse "20XX-20XX" (yes, this will be the same for all students)This will be the current academic year for the cohort you are entering

    Program Institution The institution name (also the same for all your students)

    Program Site Use the city address, i.e. "Olympia" or "Seattle"

    Program Route Number Use only "1" "2" "3" or "4"

    Program Scholarship Use only "Y" or "N"

    Demographic DOB use MM/DD/YYYY format

    Demographic Gender use only "Female" or "Male" or "Not Reported"

    Demographic Ethnicity (new) This is the new Federal ethnicity codes (don't need for now)

    Demographic Race (new) This is the new Federal race codes (again, don't need for now)

    Demographic Race (old)

    Use only the letters A, B, H, I, W, M, or N"A" Asian/Pacific Islander, "B" Black/African American"H" Hispanic, "I" Native American/Alaskan, "W" White"M" Multiracial, "N" Not Reported

    Mentor and Training (1-4) Mentor Teacher Cert Number The mentor teacher's WA teaching cert number (123456A)

    Mentor and Training (1-4) Y/NDid this person have the proper Alternative Route Mentor Training?If the student has only one mentor for the year, leave the rest of the columns blank

    Expected Endorsement (1-4) EndorsementAdd the expected endorsement that this student will receive upon completion.Select your answers from the Endorsement Table belowIf only one, leave the other columns blank

    Completion Completed (Y/N/D) Has this student completed/dropped the program?

    Completion Date Completed Use MM/DD/YYYY

    Completion WA Cert Number AwardedFor our purposes, a student will not be considered completed until they havereceived a WA state certificate number (123456A)

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    31/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 31 of 39August 2010

    Endorsement Table

    Answer Options Category Answer Definition

    Art Arts Visual

    Bilingual Specialty Bilingual Education

    Biology Science Biology

    Chemistry Science Chemistry

    Dance Arts Dance

    Deaf Education Specialty Deaf EducationEarth and Space Science Earth and Space

    Early Childhood Early Childhood Education

    Early Childhood Special Ed Early Childhood Early Childhood Special Education

    Elementary Education Elementary Elementary Education

    English Language Arts Secondary English Language Arts

    English Language Learners K-12 English Language Learners

    Environmental Specialty Environmental and Sustainability Education

    Gifted Specialty Gifted Education

    Health and Fitness K-12 Health and Fitness

    History Secondary History

    Mathematics Secondary Mathematics

    Middle Level Humanities Middle Level Humanities

    Middle Level Mathematics Middle LevelMiddle Level Mathematics

    Those that a Math/Science endorsement, add to both categoriesMiddle Level Science Middle Level Middle Level Science

    Choral Music ArtsChoral MusicFor those that have "All Music," place once in each music endorsement

    General Music ArtsDesignated Arts: General MusicFor those that have "All Music," place once in each music endorsement

    Instrumental Music ArtsDesignated Arts: Instrumental MusicFor those that have "All Music," place once in each music endorsement

    Physics Science Designated Science: Physics

    Reading K-12 Reading

    Science Science All Science

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    32/39

  • 8/6/2019 SMU Form 2A 2011 Application

    33/39

    FORM 2A Alternative Routes to Certification Program Proposal PAGE 33 of 39

    June 2010

    APPENDIX AEligibility Criteria and Entry Requirements (from ESSSB 6696)

    Alternative Routes to Teacher Certification

    Alternative routes for classified staff --Route 1: Alternative route programs operating route one programs shall enroll currently employed

    classified instructional employees with transferable associate degrees seeking residency teachercertification with endorsements in special education, bilingual education, or English as a secondlanguage. It is anticipated that candidates enrolled in this route will complete both their baccalaureatedegree and requirements for residency certification in two years or less, including a mentoredinternship t