sme and clusters in russian regions > cases and lessons...
TRANSCRIPT
1
SME and Clusters in Russian Regions > Cases and Lessons for SME Policy
Alexey Prazdnichnykh
Bauman Innovation, Academy of National Economy
VII Knowledge Economy ForumAncona, Italy, June 17 – 19 2008
2
Content
1. SME performance of Russian economy
2. Cluster specific barriers for SME development > 3 Cases from Russian regions
3. Lessons for SME Policy
3
Industry structure of small business sector in Russia
Small business (<50 people) share of total employment, 2003
Source: OECD (2005), RCSME (2004), Rosstat (2007), analysis by Bauman Innovation* Employment data corresponds to the international definition of small enterprises (50 people or less). Industry statistics on small business in Russia
corresponds to the national definition of small business (excl. farm employment), which includes enterprises with 50-100 employment for some sectors
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%
Russia*
USA, 2000
Switzerland
Great Britain
Ireland
Finland
Germany
France
Sweden
Austria
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Italy
Agriculture15%
Manufacturing14%
Construction13%Wholesale and
retail trade37%
Real estate, renting and business activities
8%
Other industries
13%
SME underperformance of Russian economy is a challenge for the economic and industrial development
4
Small business (<50 people) share of capital investment in manufacturing, 2002
Small business (<100 people) share of employment in manufacturing, 2002
Source: OECD (2005), Rosstat (2007), analysis by Bauman Innovation* Employment data refer to firms with 100 or less employed for all countries. Investment data for countries except Russia refer to firms with 50 or less
employed (international definition of small enterprises). Investment data for Russia refer to firms with 100 or less employed, excl. individual entrepreneurs
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Russia, 2005SlovakiaGermany
IrelandFrance
USA, 2001Austria
Great BritainFinland
HungaryCzech Rep.
PolandAustralia
NorwayJapanSpain
PortugalItaly
Korea, Rep.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Russia, 2005
Japan, 2003
Slovakia
Korea, Rep., 2003
Poland
Australia
Austria
Hungary
Czech Rep., 2003
Sweden
Great Britain
France, 2003
Portugal
Italy, 2003
Small business share of manufacturing employment and capital investment in Russia is also comparatively low
5
Entrepreneurships
SME development
SME integration in cluster
Entrepreneurial activity, SME and cluster development are 3 important interrelated “ingredients” of Russian economy diversification and regional development
6
Total entrepreneurial activity, 2006
Source: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2007), World Bank (2007)
Australia
Argentina
Belgium
Brazil
Great BritainHungary
Germany
Greece
Denmark
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Island
Spain
Italy
Canada
China
Columbia
Latv ia
Malay sia
Mexico Netherlands
Norway
UAERussia
SingaporeSlov enia
USA
Tailand
Turkey
Uruguay
Philippines
FinlandFrance
CroatiaCzech Rep.
Chile
Sweden
South Af rica
Jamaica
Japan
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
- 5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000 25 000 30 000 35 000 40 000 45 000GDP per capita PPP, 2005
Tota
l ent
repr
eneu
rial
act
ivity
inde
x (T
EA
), 20
06
Low level of entrepreneurial activity in Russia can also explain low level of SME development
7
Content
1. SME performance of Russian economy
2. Cluster specific barriers for SME development > 3 Cases from Russian regions
3. Lessons for SME Policy
8
Ecosystem of suppliers
Access to the market &
competition
Financial resources
Infrastructure
Human Capital
Technological capacity
Administrative barriers & regulation
• Access to the market • Access to raw materials• Competition • Structure of industry
• Relations with “anchor”company (i.e. OEM)
• Cooperation among SMEs
• Specialized service providers
• Production (industrial) real estate
• Logistic infrastructure • Incubators • Electricity supply
• Process technology and equipment
• Technological level of suppliers
• Administrative barriers • Industry and issues
specific regulation • Engineers • Skilled workers • Managers • Specialized educational
programs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
• Financial recourses for starting and development of company
Enabling environment is becoming more important for SME development in Russian regions…but now it is driven by “endowment” factors
Source: Bauman Innovation, “OPORA”
9
Архангельская областьКластер продуктов издерева
Республика ТатарстанАвтомобильный кластер
КраснодарскийкрайАгро-пищевойкластер
Томская областьКластер информационно-коммуникационных технологий
Пермский крайХимический кластер
Agro & food processing cluster in Krasnod region
Forest products cluster in Arhangelsk region
Chemical products cluster in Perm region
Automotive cluster in Tatarstan region
ICT cluster in Tomskregion
• Interviews with companies (10-15)
• Survey of companies (35-50)• Structured meeting/workshop
with key companies
Barriers for SME development are cluster and regional specific and regional and local administration can play important roles
10
Case 1 - Agro & food processing cluster in Krasnodar region
11
Access to the market & competition
1 • Availability and quality of raw materials
• Distributors and efficiency of market channels
• Market power of buyers (consolidation)
• Availability of skilled workers
• Availability of engineers and related specialists
• Availability of business development educational programs
• Availability of short term financial resources (less than 1 year)
• Availability of long term financial resources (more than 5 years)
• Availability of leasing services
Human Capital
2
Financial resources
3
Enabling environment for agro & food processing cluster in Krasnodarregion (1/2)
Positive assessment Negative assessment
Source: interviews and survey of companies in the cluster, Bauman Innovation, “OPORA”
12
Infrastructure
4 • Quality of logistic infrastructure
• Availability of production (industrial) real estate
• Availability of land
• Availability of new process technology and equipment
• Technological level of companies
• Technological level of suppliers
• Level of administrative barriers
• Quality of tax administrative processes
• Customs procedures
Technological capacity
5
Administrative barriers & regulation
6
Positive assessment Negative assessment
Enabling environment for agro & food processing cluster in Krasnodarregion (2/2)
Source: interviews and survey of companies in the cluster, Bauman Innovation, “OPORA”
13
Goals for cooperation Intensity and efficiency of SME’scooperation
Cooperation in agro & food processing cluster in Krasnodar region
New product development
Human capital
Joint promotion on national market
Quality improvement & cost reduction
Joint procurement
Joint promotion on int. market
SME’scooperation
with…
Anchor company
Research Institute
Technical School
University
SMEs
Source: interviews and survey of companies in the cluster, Bauman Innovation, “OPORA”
14
Case 2 – Automotive cluster in Tatarstan region
15
Access to the market & competition
1 • Availability and quality of raw materials
• Procurement policy of the anchor company (OEM)
• Availability of foreign customers
• Availability of skilled workers
• Availability of engineers and related specialists
• Availability of business development educational programs
• Availability of short term financial resources (less than 1 year)
• Availability of long term financial resources (more than 5 years)
• Availability of leasing services
Human Capital
2
Financial resources
3
Enabling environment for automotive cluster in Tatarstan region (1/2)Positive assessment Negative assessment
Source: interviews and survey of companies in the cluster, Bauman Innovation, “OPORA”
16
Infrastructure
4 • Availability of production (industrial) real estate
• Quality of transport infrastructure
• Quality of electricity supply
• Technological level of companies
• Availability of new process technology and equipment
• Technological level of suppliers
• Level of administrative barriers
• Quality of tax administrative processes
• Industry specific regulation
Technological capacity
5
Administrative barriers & regulation
6
Positive assessment Negative assessment
Enabling environment for automotive cluster in Tatarstan region (2/2)
Source: interviews and survey of companies in the cluster, Bauman Innovation, “OPORA”
17
Goals for cooperation Intensity and efficiency of SME’scooperation
New product development
Human capital
Joint promotion on national market
Quality improvement & cost reduction
Joint procurement
Joint promotion on int. market
SME’scooperation
with…
Anchor company
Research Institute
Technical School
University
SMEs
Cooperation in automotive cluster in Tatarstan region
Source: interviews and survey of companies in the cluster, Bauman Innovation, “OPORA”
18
Case 3 – ICT cluster in Tomsk region
19
Access to the market & competition
1 • Government procurement
• IPP regulation
• Availability of foreign customers
• Availability of engineers and related specialists
• Availability of business development educational programs
• Quality of Life in region for human capital retaining
• Availability of venture capital
• Availability of financial resources for commercialization of technology (seed and pre-seed)
• Availability of leasing services
Human Capital
2
Financial resources
3
Positive assessment Negative assessment
Enabling environment for ICT cluster in Tomsk region (1/2)
Source: interviews and survey of companies in the cluster, Bauman Innovation, “OPORA”
20
Infrastructure
4• Availability of production (industrial) real estate
• Availability of office space
• Availability of business incubator space
• Quality of technology transfer/commercialization office
• Technological level of companies
• Availability of new product and process technology
• Level of administrative barriers and industry specific regulation
• Quality of tax administrative processes
• Customs procedures
Technological capacity
5
Administrative barriers & regulation
6
Positive assessment Negative assessment
Enabling environment for ICT cluster in Tomsk region (2/2)
Source: interviews and survey of companies in the cluster, Bauman Innovation, “OPORA”
21
Goals for cooperation Intensity and efficiency of SME’scooperation
New product development
Human capital
Joint promotion on national market
Quality improvement & cost reduction
Joint procurement
Joint promotion on int. market
SME’scooperation
with…
Anchor company
Research Institute
Technical School
University
SMEs
Cooperation (with partners in Russia) in ICT in Tomsk region
Source: interviews and survey of companies in the cluster, Bauman Innovation, “OPORA”
22
Content
1. SME performance of Russian economy
2. Cluster specific barriers for SME development > 3 Cases from Russian regions
3. Lessons for SME Policy
23
…Lessons for SME policy
• Differences in enabling environment across Russian regions and clusters are key challenge for national SME policy
• Some of regional differences can be explained be efficiency of SME policy of regional administration
• Regional and local governments will play more important role in SME development
• Regional SME policy (short and medium term) can be focused on some important issues: infrastructure (i.e. industrial/suppliers park), availability of financial resources, regional innovation infrastructure and administrative barriers
• Two different models of regional SME policy is emerging in Russia (“less involvement” and “more dirigistic”)
• National SME policy should be more focused on stimulating and supporting regional SME policy
SME & clusters in Russian regions and…
• Low level of SME development in Russian economy in general and in manufacturingsectors
• Entrepreneurship activity, SME and clusterdevelopment are 3 important interrelated “ingredients”
• Current SME drivers in Russian regions are based on “endowment” factors like market size
• Regional specific enabling environment is becoming more important for SME & cluster development
• Competitive strategy of SMEs in Russia is more regional and national market oriented
• Intensity and efficiency of SME’s cooperation is low
• Access to the market (i.e. market channels, OEM procurement policy and government procurement) is important enabling factor
• Availability of financial resources and cluster specific infrastructure is also important
Short and medium term challenges for SME policy in Russia