small grains management field day · 5 progress on the ‘born, bred, and brewed in new york’...
TRANSCRIPT
Small Grains Management Field DayPoormon Farms
Seneca Falls, NYJune 6, 2019
An Educational Program of the Integrated Field Crop, Soil, and Pest Management Program Work Team; Cornell Cooperative Extension; the Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station; and Cornell University Sections of Soil and Crop Sciences, Plant Breeding and Genetics, and Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology.
Agenda 1 Sign-in, name tags, and refreshments 9:30 am
**Remember to sign DEC & CCA CEU sheet prior to start of program
2 Welcome and introductions 10:00 am
3 2019 Crop development and management observations 10:05 am Cornell Cooperative Extension Field Crops Educators
4 Small grain breeding, varieties, and availability of seed 10:25 am David Benscher and Phil Atkins pp 2 - 11
5 Progress on the ‘Born, Bred, and Brewed in New York’ spring barley variety 10:40 am development, Daniel Sweeney
6 Nitrogen fertility for small grains 10:50 am Mike Stanyard
7 Update on integrated disease management in small grains - including 11:00 am new fungicide options, Gary Bergstrom pp 12 - 22
8 New developments in the barley-malt-beer value chain 11:15 am Various speakers including Jeff Trout, grower, Judd Hallett, maltster, and Jon Paul Partee, brewer
10 Updates and comments from attendees 11:30 am
Adjourn 12:00 pm
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 2
2018 Cornell Small Grains Regional Trial EntriesSoft White Winter Wheat Regional Red Winter Wheat Regional
Years Mkt Years MktEntry Name Tested Class Pedigree/Origin - Contact Entry Name Tested Class Pedigree/Origin - Contact
1 Houser 40 SWW B/N10//82A1/3/H-HR/YW/4/GE//CI 12658/Alaskan/3/Avon (Cornell) 1 Otsego 13 SRW Ohio State U. (OH751)2 Caledonia 28 SWW Offtype selection out of Geneva (Cornell) 2 Erie (OH02-12686) 9 SRW Foster/Hopewell//OH581/OH5693 Cayuga 26 SWW Reselection of NY262-37-10W (Cornell) 3 Pioneer 25R40 6 SRW Pioneer Hybrid International4 Medina 16 SWW MD286-21/Harus 4 IL04-8445-440 5 SRW U of Illinois5 Hopkins 14 SWW NY7387/Caledonia//Caledonia-2///Caledonia 9-10 (BC2F4select) 5 Pioneer 25R25 4 SRW Pioneer Hybrid International6 NY99056-161 8 SWW NY85020-395/Pio25W33 (10+6) 6 Hilliard (VA11W-108) 4 SRW Virginia Crop Improvement7 NY94052-6090B-1074 6 SWW CaledoniaReselect - selected white kernels 7 MI14R0329 3 SRW Michigan State U8 NY01003-1184 2 SWW Caledonia x Pio25W60 8 L11418 2 SRW LimaGrain - Ken McClintock9 NY10127-10-04-1305 2 SWW 09099-26 x 09090-2 9 NY11013-10-72-1314 2 SRW 10011-6 x Ava = OH02-12686/Ava-6//Ava10 NY11025-07-08-1369 2 SWW 10080-1 x Pio25w36 = 03179-10/Pio25w36-1//Pio25w36 10 NY11013-10-15-1312 2 SRW 10011-6 x Ava = OH02-12686/Ava-6//Ava11 NY02007-1206 2 SWW NY7387/Cayuga/Superior 11 OH12-259-48 1 SRW Ohio State U. 12 NY11014-9-25-1319 2 SWW 10061-4 x Ava = 03179-10/Ava-4//Ava 12 NY12005-1-5-9 1 SRW13 NY11025-02-04-1365 2 SWW 10080-1 x Pio25w36 = 03179-10/Pio25w36-1//Pio25w36 13 NY12015-2-1-4 1 SRW14 NY11025-07-17-1371 2 SWW 10080-1 x Pio25w36 = 03179-10/Pio25w36-1//Pio25w36 14 NY04006-1245 1 SRW P98134B3-1-4-6/Caledonia//Caledonia 3///Caledonia(BYDV)15 NY10102-1-14-1276 1 SWW 09019-1 x 03179-10=(OH02-12678/03179-10-3//03179-10-1///03179-10)15 NY11013-10-6-1311 1 SRW16 NY12016-1-1-7 1 SWW E2041 x OH751 16 SW70SR 1 SRW Seedway, Hall NY17 NY12006-2-1-27 1 SWW Medina x 03180-10 17 SW64SR 1 SRW Seedway, Hall NY18 NY12006-2-1-7 1 SWW Medina x 03180-10 18 L11639 1 SRW Limagrain - Ken McClintok19 NY10102-1-08-1274 1 SWW 09019-1 x 03179-10=(OH02-12678/03179-10-3//03179-10-1///03179-10)19 L11725 (DH) 1 SRW Limagrain - Ken McClintok20 NY12030-1-1-1 1 SWW 99021 x 94025 20 L11719 (DH) 1 SRW Limagrain - Ken McClintok21 NY11025-02-23-1367 1 SWW 10080-1 x Pio25w36 = 03179-10/Pio25w36-1//Pio25w36 21 L11434 1 SRW Limagrain - Ken McClintok22 NY12006-2-1-6 1 SWW Medina x 03180-10 22 NY12016-1-1-11 1 SRW E2041 x OH75123 NY12006-2-1-10 1 SWW Medina x 03180-10 23 NY12002-1-2-24 1 SRW24 NY12031-1-1-11 1 SWW 94025 x 99038 24 NY11024-01-11-1363 1 SRW25 NY12030-1-1-9 1 SWW 94025 x 99038 25 OH12-228-42 1 SRW Ohio State U. 26 NY11014-9-60-1320 1 SWW 10061-4 x Ava = 03179-10/Ava-4//Ava 26 NY11030-5-12-1341 1 SRW27 NY11014-9-17-1318 1 SWW 10061-4 x Ava = 03179-10/Ava-4//Ava 27 OH13-49-22 1 SRW Ohio State U. 28 NY12006-2-1-18 1 SWW 10061-4 x Ava = 03179-10/Ava-4//Ava 28 NY12020-1-2-15 1 SRW29 NY12006-2-1-20 1 SWW 10061-4 x Ava = 03179-10/Ava-4//Ava 29 NY11029-10-24-1340 1 SRW30 NY10102-1-04-1273 1 SWW 09019-1 x 03179-10=(OH02-12678/03179-10-3//03179-10-1///03179-10)30 NY11020-1-45-1332 1 SRW
Spring Oat Regional Trial Winter Malting Barley Regional TrialYears Entry # Yrs Rows Breeder
Entry Name Tested Pedigree/Origin - Contact 1 Charles 6 2 USDA - [email protected] OGLE 40 Brave//Tyler/Egdolon 23 (Astro/PI 193027) 2 Saturn 6 6 [email protected] NEWDAK 33 ND810104=RL 3038/ Goodland// Ogle 3 10467r2 5 6 [email protected] IL00-7267(Corral) 12 IL95-4774/IL95-8346 4 KWS Scala 5 2 KWS4 SD081107 7 IL99-1338//ND011054/SD020835 5 SY Tepee (209-66) 5 2 MaltEurope5 MN09255 7 SA050128/ND020965 6 Endeavor 5 2 USDA - [email protected] SD111946 5 IL99-1338//ND011054/SD020835 7 Nectaria 4 2 Secobra7 SD111922 5 IL99-1338//ND011054/SD020835 8 AC 07/041/8 (Flavia) 4 2 Ackermann Saatzucht GmbH8 Hidalgo 4 SynAgri 9 KWS Somerset (KW2-237)3 2 KWS9 Vitality 3 SynAgri 10 KWS2-430 3 2 KWS10 Hayden 3 Seedway 11 06-OR-9 3 6 OSU11 Streaker 3 SDSU - M. Caffe 12 SU-Mateo 2 2 BRGD.2448 x Malwinta12 Buff 3 SDSU - M. Caffe 13 Vincenta 2 2 [(01/329/2 x Metaxa) x Wintmalt] x Wintmalt13 IL10-9867 3 Saber/ BT333// Saber 14 10/069/1 2 6 Ackermann Saatzucht GmbH14 SD120640 3 IL02-8658/SD060130 15 Alba 2 6 OSU15 MNBT1021-1 2 Shelby 427/5/(A. strigosa PI 258731/Ogle)C1//*4 Saber 16 DH130910 2 2 SHORT11-7 (TC6W265)/HERZ 29494/2991 (35)16 MNBT1020-1 2 Shelby 427/5/(A. strigosa PI 258731/Ogle)C1//*4 Saber 17 Calypso 1 2 Limagrain17 SD120419 2 SDSU - M. Caffe 18 Violetta 1 2 Limagrain18 CDC Norseman 2 OT590/CDC Minstrel 19 Wintermalt 1 6 Cornell19 IL12 - 9020 1 8024, 8044 (fill plots umopn17) 20 DH131055 1 2 OR818/KW2-04220 Newburg (ck) 1 HiFi/ND990232 21 DH131738 1 2 OR910/05-5401/0521 WIX10055-8 1 WIX8791-1 / WIX8826-4 22 DH130935 1 2 OR818/KW2-04222 WIX10169-5 1 WIX9182-1/Robust 23 Buck (Naked) 1 6 Strider/Doyce
24 #STRKR (Naked) 1 6 Maja/Legacy/Maja/3/Doyce25 10.1150 (Naked) 1 6 Fridericus x Maja/Legacy//Maja/3/Doyce26 10.1618 (Naked) 1 6 Fridericus x Maja/Legacy//Maja/3/Doyce27 OSU1-4 (Naked) 1 2 Himalaya/3/Luca/Waxbar//Luca28 OSU1-6 (Naked) 1 2 Himalaya/3/Luca/Waxbar//Luca
Spring Malting Barley Regional TrialRow Years
Entry Name No. Tested Pedigree/Origin - Contact1 Conlon 2 6 NDSU2 Quest 6 6 UMN3 KWS Tinka 2 5 KWS4 ND Genesis 2 4 NDSU5 Harmony* 6 4 SynAgri6 Oceanik* 6 4 SynAgri7 AAC Synergy 2 3 AgCanada8 Newdale 2 3 AgCanada9 KWS 15/3716 2 2 KWS10 09N2-67 2 2 UMN11 08MT-03 2 2 UMN12 KWS Jessie 2 1 KWS13 KWS Chrissie 2 1 KWS14 LCS Opera 2 1 LimaGrain15 LCS Sienna 2 1 LimaGrain16 Explorer 2 1 NDSU17 2ND33757 2 1 NDSU18 2ND33760 2 1 NDSU19 DH130910 2 1 OSU20 DH131055 2 1 OSU
21 DH131742 2 1 OSU22 DH130935 2 1 OSU
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 3
2018 Soft White Winter Wheat Summaries - Cornell University
Grain Yield (kg/h) Test Lodging Head Winter Preharvest FHB FHB FHB Regional Locations Weight Score Date Surv Height Sprouting Incid. Sev. Index
Entry Ith-McGIth-Ket SenCoTSenCoF Mean Rank kg/hl Rank 0-9 2 Loc % cm 0-9 Rank % % % Rank1 Houser 6715 5846 6037 5258 5964 22 75.0 17 6.3 6/4 96 115 5.6 28 na na na na2 Caledonia 6231 5372 6433 6081 6029 17 75.0 19 0.0 6/4 97 92 5.8 30 91 42 39.1 273 Cayuga 5874 5466 6096 5763 5800 25 76.6 2 3.3 6/5 96 123 1.9 1 na na na na4 Medina 6399 5594 6532 5969 6124 9 75.9 6 1.7 6/4 95 104 3.3 4 61 18 10.8 125 Hopkins 6814 5650 6904 5745 6278 4 75.7 8 0.7 6/2 99 90 5.1 23 na na na 306 NY99056-161 6422 5345 6459 6252 6119 10 76.0 5 3.0 6/5 95 100 5.4 26 31 14 4.1 17 NY94052-6090-1074 6408 6021 6524 5778 6183 7 75.5 12 0.0 6/5 100 104 4.4 16 41 18 6.8 68 NY01003-1184 5546 4867 6513 6799 5931 24 74.5 22 0.0 6/6 45 93 4.3 12 61 43 26.4 269 NY10127-10-04-1305 5405 6019 5558 5557 5635 27 74.4 24 2.3 6/4 90 89 4.0 8 70 38 26.3 2510 NY11025-07-08-1369 5306 5709 6670 6287 5993 20 73.6 28 0.0 6/3 88 90 3.8 6 59 20 11.9 1511 NY02007-1206 6008 5949 6345 6111 6103 12 76.8 1 1.7 6/6 93 92 3.3 3 79 33 25.7 2412 NY11014-9-25-1319 6540 5989 6533 6639 6426 1 75.7 7 1.0 6/4 78 95 3.8 7 30 16 5.5 413 NY11025-02-04-1365 6331 5827 6168 5630 5989 21 75.7 9 0.7 6/3 96 90 5.1 24 49 21 8.8 1014 NY11025-07-17-1371 5522 4981 6098 6358 5740 26 75.2 16 0.0 6/3 75 93 5.6 27 51 16 8.1 915 NY10102-1-14-1276 6413 5922 6510 5324 6042 16 74.1 26 3.0 6/2 98 99 3.5 5 56 28 15.9 2116 12016-1-1-7 5358 4684 6217 6125 5596 28 73.5 29 2.3 6/2 50 88 4.2 11 56 19 9.7 1117 12006-2-1-27 6418 5794 6318 5783 6078 14 75.3 14 2.0 6/5 94 89 4.5 19 59 24 15.2 1918 12006-2-1-7 6637 5813 6581 5830 6215 6 76.2 4 3.0 6/5 98 104 3.2 2 71 24 17.7 2319 NY10102-1-08-1274 6058 5877 7077 5484 6124 8 74.6 20 2.7 6/2 96 98 4.3 13 50 16 8.0 820 12030-1-1-1 6556 5365 6364 6187 6118 11 74.1 27 2.7 6/7 95 92 4.1 9 55 19 11.1 1321 NY11025-02-23-1367 5436 5229 5604 6112 5595 29 74.5 21 0.3 6/2 78 92 4.5 18 39 16 5.4 322 12006-2-1-6 6244 5978 6195 5589 6002 19 75.6 11 3.3 6/6 95 94 4.4 17 66 26 17.2 2223 12006-2-1-10 6507 5826 6257 5703 6073 15 75.0 18 1.0 6/6 94 94 4.4 14 60 23 14.4 1824 12031-1-1-11 5388 4836 5748 5988 5490 30 73.3 30 0.0 6/9 75 91 4.6 21 41 35 14.4 1725 12030-1-1-9 6538 5066 5916 6236 5939 23 74.3 25 0.3 6/6 98 95 5.4 25 59 19 11.2 1426 NY11014-9-60-1320 5989 5605 6553 6183 6082 13 75.3 13 0.3 6/3 88 93 5.7 29 28 21 4.4 227 NY11014-9-17-1318 6841 6009 6388 6142 6345 2 76.4 3 0.7 6/5 96 94 4.7 22 30 18 6.0 528 12006-2-1-18 5975 5874 6839 6277 6241 5 74.4 23 1.7 6/5 85 92 4.6 20 55 24 13.1 1629 12006-2-1-20 6579 5933 6780 5972 6316 3 75.2 15 0.0 6/5 96 101 4.4 15 63 25 15.3 2030 NY10102-1-04-1273 6011 5852 6611 5606 6020 18 75.6 10 4.3 6/3 90 93 4.1 10 58 14 7.9 7
Mean 6149 5610 6361 5959 6020 75.1 1.6 5/25 89 96 4.4 54 23 13.3CV 58.0 5.2 7.5 7.0
Cumulative Summary Grain Yield Lodging Head FHB FHB FHB Preharv WSSMV Height Winter 7 Year 5 Year 2 Year Test Weight 0-9 0-9 Date %Inc %Sev Index Sprout Rating cm Surv
Entry kg/h b/a kg/h b/a kg/h b/a 5 Yr lb/b 2 Yr lb/b 5 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr 2Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr1 Houser 5146 77 5366 80 5623 84 72.8 57.3 72.2 56.9 3.7 4.0 6/1 na na na 5.1 6.3 114 972 Caledonia 5441 81 5765 86 5967 89 72.4 57.0 72.7 57.2 0.3 0.2 6/1 75 31 25.6 5.6 5.7 92 983 Cayuga 4948 74 5303 79 5554 83 76.3 60.1 76.0 59.8 4.0 2.4 6/3 na na na 2.1 6.3 123 964 Medina 5517 82 5832 87 6074 90 74.3 58.5 74.4 58.6 0.9 1.2 6/2 37 16 6.3 3.4 7.0 109 975 Hopkins 5639 84 6025 90 6257 93 73.0 57.5 73.5 57.9 0.8 0.5 5/31 na na na 5.3 5.3 95 996 NY99056-161 5679 84 5989 89 6039 90 73.9 58.2 74.8 58.9 1.6 2.0 6/2 20 9 2.3 4.8 5.7 102 977 NY94052-6090B-1074 5929 88 6026 90 73.7 58.0 74.0 58.2 0.6 0.3 6/3 28 24 5.6 3.8 7.0 105 1008 NY01003-1184 5895 88 73.5 57.9 0.6 6/3 51 36 19.1 4.0 2.7 100 729 NY10127-10-04-1305 5823 87 73.4 57.8 1.3 6/1 58 26 16.6 3.9 5.7 94 9410 NY11025-07-08-1369 6115 91 72.1 56.8 0.2 5/31 53 22 11.7 3.6 6.3 92 9111 NY02007-1206 6130 91 74.8 58.9 0.8 6/3 49 22 14.0 3.3 7.0 99 9612 NY11014-9-25-1319 6282 93 73.8 58.1 0.8 6/1 27 15 4.5 4.0 5.0 100 8813 NY11025-02-04-1365 5825 87 73.6 57.9 0.3 6/1 39 16 6.1 4.7 4.7 94 9714 NY11025-07-17-1371 5889 88 73.0 57.5 0.3 5/31 52 21 11.0 5.5 7.3 94 85
M.E. Sorrells, D. Benscher, J. Tanaka, Amy Fox - Department of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Cornell University
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 4
2018 Red Winter Wheat Summaries - Cornell University Grain Yield (kg/h) Test Preharvest Winter FHB
Regional Locations Weight Lodg. Head Sprouting Surv. Height Incid. Sev. IndexEntry Ith-Sny Ith-KetSenCoTSenCoTMean Rank kg/hl Rank 0-9 Date 0-9 Rank % cm % % Rank
1 Otsego 5902 5381 6027 5031 5585 30 76.4 12 3.7 6/3 1.1 3 93 100 NA NA NA NA2 Erie (OH02-12686) 5517 6418 6602 5827 6091 21 75.4 21 1.3 6/5 4.2 22 80 91 51 15 8 83 Pioneer 25R40 6908 6744 6811 7500 6991 1 76.2 16 2.0 6/2 4.4 26 88 81 73 15 11 254 IL04-8445-440 6168 6314 6478 6574 6384 10 77.9 3 2.7 6/2 2.7 12 88 90 49 18 9 155 Pioneer 25R25 6703 7049 7255 6494 6875 3 74.7 25 0.7 6/4 4.1 20 90 89 66 13 10 236 Hilliard (VA11W-108) 5920 6700 6593 6689 6476 7 76.4 11 0.0 6/3 5.9 30 80 93 63 13 8 127 MI14R0329 5890 6270 6659 6696 6379 11 76.1 17 0.0 6/4 4.1 21 75 94 56 16 9 198 L11418 5969 6669 6512 6041 6298 16 76.9 7 6.3 5/31 1.4 4 90 89 59 14 8 119 NY11013-10-72-1314 5864 6310 6626 6491 6323 15 74.8 24 1.3 6/5 2.5 11 88 103 33 11 4 510 NY11013-10-15-1312 6312 6543 6669 6273 6449 9 76.5 10 7.3 6/5 1.9 8 88 103 20 18 3 311 OH12-259-48 5908 6009 6331 6459 6177 20 78.3 1 0.0 6/3 3.8 18 88 98 76 20 16 2812 12005-1-5-9 5874 5625 5993 6070 5890 26 77.2 5 2.0 6/2 3.8 19 85 79 48 22 10 2213 12015-2-1-4 5866 6421 6222 6243 6188 19 76.7 9 1.0 6/5 1.4 5 87 89 55 16 9 2014 NY04006-1245 5967 6223 6322 6454 6241 17 74.9 22 0.0 6/4 3.7 17 90 94 80 30 24 2915 NY11013-10-6-1311 6115 6563 6560 6146 6346 13 75.6 20 1.3 6/6 2.9 13 82 100 50 14 7 716 SW70SR 6709 6412 6866 6485 6618 5 76.9 8 0.0 6/4 1.8 7 94 86 56 14 8 917 SW64SR 6832 6589 6659 6611 6673 4 74.5 28 3.7 5/31 4.3 23 85 85 73 13 9 1718 L11639 6116 6354 6590 5817 6219 18 77.1 6 7.3 5/31 3.6 16 80 96 33 9 3 119 L11725 (DH) 6765 6267 6689 6206 6482 6 74.2 29 1.3 6/2 0.3 1 93 89 56 19 12 2620 L11719 (DH) 6581 6813 6922 7527 6961 2 76.2 15 1.7 6/2 4.5 27 90 80 70 14 10 2121 L11434 6176 5698 6199 6043 6029 23 77.5 4 1.3 5/30 5.5 29 75 88 36 11 4 622 12016-1-1-11 6596 6346 6327 6101 6342 14 74.7 26 1.3 6/3 1.7 6 78 96 44 21 9 1623 12002-1-2-24 5665 5671 6292 5293 5730 29 73.8 30 2.3 6/2 2.3 10 88 85 54 21 12 2724 NY11024-01-11-1363 5894 6322 6127 5791 6034 22 78.1 2 0.0 6/3 4.5 28 95 103 30 24 8 1025 OH12-228-42 6814 6462 6590 6011 6469 8 75.9 18 3.3 6/3 4.3 24 93 101 38 9 3 426 NY11030-5-12-1341 6397 6185 6645 6280 6377 12 76.3 13 2.7 6/5 3.0 14 85 94 69 15 10 2427 OH13-49-22 5989 6034 5800 6116 5985 24 75.7 19 0.0 6/3 3.2 15 93 98 50 17 9 1328 12020-1-2-15 5724 5840 6082 5455 5775 28 74.5 27 2.0 6/4 0.7 2 92 98 53 18 9 1429 NY11029-10-24-1340 5603 5881 6093 5821 5850 27 76.3 14 1.3 6/8 2.0 9 83 103 26 10 3 230 NY11020-1-45-1332 5764 5761 5880 6295 5925 25 74.8 23 0.0 6/4 4.3 25 88 95 61 15 9 18
Mean 6150 6262 6447 6228 6272 76.0 1.9 6/3 3.1 87 93 53 16 9CV 5.4 3.6 6.2 6.7
Cumulative Summary Preharv FHB FHB FHB Grain Yield Lodg. Height Head Winter Sprout WSSMV Incid. Sev. Index
4 Year 3 Year 2 Year Test Wt(2Yr) 0-9 cm Date Surv. 0-9 Rating % %Entry kg/h b/a kg/h b/a kg/h b/a kg/hl lb/b 2 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr 1Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr
1 Otsego 5777 86 5970 89 5710 85 74.0 57.8 2.6 101 6/1 95 0.8 2.7 61 14 52 Erie (OH02-12686) 6336 94 6628 99 6497 97 74.5 58.2 1.2 96 6/3 88 3.5 5.7 42 13 23 Pioneer 25R40 6969 104 7229 108 7075 105 75.1 58.6 1.0 87 5/30 93 2.7 7.0 75 14 64 IL04-8445-440 6646 99 6820 101 6727 100 76.0 59.4 2.1 95 5/29 92 1.6 5.0 38 16 25 Pioneer 25R25 6721 100 6976 104 6709 100 73.6 57.5 0.3 90 6/1 92 2.3 6.0 53 11 26 Hilliard (VA11W-108) 6511 97 6679 99 6291 94 74.8 58.4 0.5 98 5/30 90 3.1 6.3 55 12 67 MI14R0329 6557 98 6412 95 74.8 58.4 0.5 98 6/1 83 2.5 5.7 52 14 38 L11418 6428 96 74.9 58.5 4.7 93 5/28 94 0.9 5.0 47 13 39 NY11013-10-72-1314 6239 93 74.0 57.8 1.2 107 6/4 93 1.4 6.3 27 10 510 NY11013-10-15-1312 6563 98 74.9 58.5 4.2 106 6/2 89 1.0 6.0 21 16 3
M.E. Sorrells, D. Benscher, J. Tanaka, A. Fox - Department of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Cornell University
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 5
2018
Win
ter
Mal
ting
Bar
ley
Regi
onal
Tri
al S
umm
ary
- C
orne
ll U
nive
rsit
y
Gra
in Y
ield
(kg/
h)W
int
FHB
FHB
FHB
FHB
PHS
Powd
ery
Kern
elon
Mal
tBar
ley
Beta
All M
alt
Regi
onal
Loc
atio
nsTe
st W
eigh
tLod
g.He
ight
Head
Surv
Inc
Sev
Inde
xFH
BDO
NSc
ore
PHS
Mild
ewSc
ald
Wt
6/64
"Ex
tPro
tein
DPGl
ucan
FAN
Qual
Entry
Row
Ith-S
nyIth
-Ket
SenC
oTSe
nCoF
Mea
nb/
aRa
nkkg
/hlR
ank
0-9
cmDa
te%
%%
(%)
Rank
ppm
0-9
Rank
0-9
0-9
(mg)
(%)
(%)
(%)
ASBC
ppm
ppm
Scor
e1
Char
les
228
5518
7742
6544
4233
6062
2854
.828
5.6
645/
2784
4710
55
131.
623
0.0
7.5
3394
8111
.295
185
227
252
Satu
rn6
6603
4722
6769
6044
6034
112
258
.226
2.7
795/
2891
7217
1218
140.
02
0.0
3.3
3685
7510
.569
714
120
NA3
1046
7r2
655
4442
7959
3871
4157
2610
64
62.5
111.
078
5/26
8380
1714
2120
0.9
210.
02.
837
9581
10.5
108
296
157
NA4
KWS
Scal
a2
4891
3521
5303
5755
4867
9021
59.9
242.
774
5/28
8357
1911
1714
0.9
220.
73.
344
9980
11.1
139
125
145
305
SY T
epee
(209
-66)
255
8329
3051
0960
2949
1391
1660
.822
4.0
795/
2886
4812
610
60.
314
0.0
3.0
3992
8111
.117
910
817
537
6En
deav
or2
4247
3718
5499
5035
4625
8624
61.0
203.
382
5/28
8638
125
317
4.8
280.
35.
333
8282
10.7
146
265
185
307
Nect
aria
253
9146
4656
8159
0354
0510
07
64.3
80.
879
5/27
8847
116
915
1.9
253.
04.
546
9881
11.2
9447
914
535
8Fl
avia
(AC
07/0
41/8
)2
5084
3674
5119
5712
4897
9119
62.3
131.
769
5/26
8355
179
1514
1.7
240.
05.
243
9781
10.8
118
290
115
289
KWS
Som
erse
t2
5465
3248
4985
5793
4873
9120
61.7
161.
881
5/25
7647
157
139
0.6
180.
52.
545
9981
10.2
147
107
124
3110
Dona
u (K
WS2
-430
)2
5476
3224
6174
6064
5234
9710
61.4
172.
179
5/28
7350
105
610
2.3
270.
33.
845
9880
10.9
148
169
125
3011
06-O
R-9
652
5150
5561
1453
9354
5310
16
58.3
250.
891
5/30
8962
2213
209
0.3
156.
30.
833
9079
10.5
134
309
127
NA12
SU-M
ateo
252
1235
3648
8260
0849
0991
1761
.319
2.4
845/
2989
339
42
30.
719
0.0
2.7
3995
7910
.812
244
211
321
13Vi
ncen
ta2
4172
1730
4813
5095
3952
7327
57.1
276.
076
5/27
9147
115
77
0.1
70.
24.
837
8779
11.0
128
209
139
2114
10/0
69/1
667
3849
0461
5264
6660
6511
31
60.9
211.
479
5/27
9182
2621
2619
0.0
11.
24.
339
9679
10.1
112
452
126
NA15
Alba
656
2452
0768
3353
3557
5010
73
60.4
231.
385
5/30
9165
1913
1912
0.2
126.
30.
230
8879
10.2
9960
211
7NA
16DH
1309
10 (F
ac)
246
3449
2743
8156
7049
0391
1864
.87
1.9
815/
2786
4512
611
140.
03
0.0
0.8
4897
8111
.413
728
615
435
17Ca
lyps
o2
6257
3821
6240
5974
5573
104
562
.314
1.9
865/
2792
5011
68
60.
210
0.0
2.8
4495
8210
.314
421
713
734
18Vi
olet
ta2
5978
2740
5645
5600
4991
9314
62.3
122.
076
5/26
9053
148
1414
0.1
40.
32.
042
9781
11.4
123
307
164
3319
Win
term
alt
648
7938
7555
1546
5847
3288
2261
.418
4.1
945/
2693
7321
1623
220.
28
0.0
4.8
3164
7810
.911
456
514
4NA
20DH
1310
55 (F
ac)
252
6342
0353
5249
9949
5492
1562
.910
1.3
875/
2892
189
21
70.
213
3.2
1.3
4998
7912
.112
627
318
030
21DH
1317
38 (F
ac)
255
5233
3052
1160
4450
3494
1362
.015
2.3
735/
2592
7021
1522
260.
517
2.7
3.0
4598
8112
.211
536
314
634
22DH
1309
35 (F
ac)
257
4635
5951
7466
7052
8798
863
.79
1.2
805/
2686
7015
1016
91.
926
0.0
2.5
4498
8011
.612
945
414
637
23Bu
ck (N
aked
)6
5545
4847
5530
4337
5065
9412
72.8
13.
986
5/29
8768
2819
2520
0.1
50.
23.
331
4987
10.5
9680
099
NA24
#STR
KR (N
aked
)6
4287
4257
5747
4288
4645
8623
69.4
23.
379
5/28
8180
4133
2727
0.2
110.
54.
830
3485
10.6
8563
797
NA25
10.1
150
(Nak
ed)
656
4546
4751
0454
3952
0997
1167
.14
0.1
835/
2786
8820
1824
310.
16
2.0
3.8
3153
8611
.210
353
910
7NA
2610
.161
8 (N
aked
)6
5155
4817
5225
5812
5252
989
68.0
33.
281
5/26
9188
4136
2825
0.2
90.
02.
730
7084
11.1
130
903
87NA
27OS
U1-4
(Nak
ed)
243
2939
5847
1847
2844
3382
2665
.35
2.4
765/
2688
5012
612
170.
316
0.0
3.7
3878
8410
.989
679
105
2528
OSU1
-6 (N
aked
)2
4310
3895
4862
5128
4549
8525
65.0
62.
678
5/27
8647
105
415
0.7
200.
03.
535
7885
11.2
7362
810
423
Mea
n52
0438
9854
4155
5650
2593
62.6
2.4
805/
2787
5817
1115
0.8
14.5
1.0
3.3
3986
8110
.911
840
713
630
CV10
.811
.012
.29.
0* f
eed
barle
yCu
mul
ativ
e Su
mm
ary
FHB
FHB
FHB
FHB
Kern
elon
Mal
t Bar
ley
Beta
All M
alt
G
rain
Yie
ldTe
stTe
stLo
dgHe
ight
Head
Win
tIn
cSe
vIn
dex
DON
PHS
Powd
ery
Brac
k-W
t6/
64"
ExtP
rote
inDP
Gluc
anFA
NQu
al
6 Ye
ar
3 Y
ear
2
Yea
rW
t(3yr
)W
t(2yr
)0-
9cm
Date
Surv
%%
%pp
mSc
oreM
ildew
Scal
dlin
g(m
g)(%
)(%
)(%
)(A
SBC)
ppm
ppm
Scor
eEn
tryRo
wkg
/hb/
akg
/hb/
akg
/hb/
akg
/hl
lb/b
kg/h
llb
/b2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr0-
90-
90-
90-
92
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr1
Char
les
230
7057
3644
6832
6561
56.2
43.9
53.2
41.6
5.7
665/
2474
3815
5.3
19.5
1.5
0.0
6.5
833
9080
10.8
107
180
222
242
Satu
rn6
4841
9057
9510
858
7010
959
.246
.357
.745
.11.
679
5/26
7861
138.
128
.30.
00.
02.
03
3788
7610
.286
609
128
NA3
1046
7r2
643
6481
5510
102
5321
9963
.449
.561
.748
.20.
578
5/24
7073
1410
.528
.70.
60.
01.
81
3796
8110
.110
718
918
0NA
4KW
S Sc
ala
238
4271
4800
8944
4783
61.5
48.0
60.1
46.9
1.6
725/
2573
4414
6.9
16.8
0.9
0.4
4.0
444
9880
10.9
148
9715
935
5SY
Tep
ee (2
09-6
6)2
3957
7448
8191
4761
8962
.348
.760
.447
.22.
379
5/26
7644
135.
523
.10.
40.
12.
14
4094
8110
.816
674
180
366
Ende
avor
238
6172
4605
8645
4384
63.2
49.4
60.7
47.4
2.1
835/
2671
339.
23.
218
.84.
90.
43.
82
3481
8110
.512
725
718
930
7Ne
ctar
ia2
5044
9451
9497
63.5
49.6
62.6
48.9
0.7
795/
2488
4711
5.4
21.3
1.6
2.8
2.4
044
9681
11.0
122
326
168
318
Flav
ia (A
C 07
/041
/8)
249
4192
4590
8563
.349
.561
.848
.21.
068
5/23
8155
158.
325
.41.
30.
14.
31
4297
8110
.411
918
113
241
9KW
S So
mer
set
251
4796
4976
9262
.648
.961
.247
.81.
283
5/24
7160
159.
324
.70.
60.
41.
82
4498
8010
.815
479
138
3910
Dona
u (K
WS2
-430
)2
5198
9750
6894
63.1
49.3
61.5
48.1
1.5
815/
2676
3911
4.1
16.0
2.2
0.3
2.8
246
9881
10.9
145
131
143
3911
06-O
R-9
653
0099
5219
9759
.246
.257
.745
.01.
094
5/28
8268
2214
.420
.50.
24.
30.
53
3284
7810
.712
229
512
8NA
12SU
-Mat
eo2
4986
9361
.047
.71.
386
5/27
7946
136.
819
.70.
80.
01.
82
4095
8010
.311
734
812
230
13Vi
ncen
ta2
4116
7757
.244
.73.
575
5/25
7338
124.
315
.70.
10.
13.
38
4090
8011
.212
116
714
033
1410
/069
/16
5517
103
60.7
47.4
1.2
785/
2478
7919
15.4
34.8
0.0
0.8
3.8
039
9580
10.2
109
345
128
NA15
Alba
654
5210
159
.846
.71.
583
5/28
8372
1913
.218
.10.
34.
60.
10
3081
7810
.497
532
118
NA16
DH13
0910
248
3290
63.9
49.9
1.0
805/
2580
4811
5.4
28.8
0.0
0.0
1.3
047
9781
11.2
140
171
176
35M
.E. S
orre
lls, D
. Ben
sche
r, J.
Tan
aka,
Am
y Fo
x - D
epar
tmen
t of P
lant
Bre
edin
g &
Gen
etic
s, C
orne
ll U
nive
rsity
Ack
now
ledg
emen
t of F
undi
ng S
ourc
es:
New
Yor
k St
ate
Ag
& M
arke
ts, U
.S. W
heat
and
Bar
ley
Scab
Initi
ativ
e, G
enes
ee V
alle
y R
egio
nal M
arke
t Aut
horit
y
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 6
2018 Winter Malting Barley Fertility Trial - Cornell University
Nitrogen Rates (lbs/a)+30# preplant Nitrogen Rates (lbs/a)Grain Yield (kg/h) 27 54 81 Mean** b/a Powdery Mildew (0-9) 27 54 81 MeanKWS Scala 4153 4648 3817 4206 78 KWS Scala 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.7SY Tepee 3853 4464 4455 4257 79 SY Tepee 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Endeavor 4157 3895 3720 3924 73 Endeavor 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.3Flavia 4429 4628 4080 4379 81 Flavia 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Calypso 5020 5070 5027 5039 94 Calypso 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Violetta 4514 4446 4118 4359 81 Violetta 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.3Mean(ns) 4354 4525 4203 4361 81 Mean(ns) 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.2b/a 81 84 78 81 cv= 14.0
Test Weight (kg/hl) 27 54 81 Mean lb/b Scald 27 54 81 MeanKWS Scala 64.3 64.7 62.4 63.8 49.8 KWS Scala 2.5 3.5 4.0 3.3SY Tepee 63.7 62.7 64.6 63.6 49.7 SY Tepee 3.0 3.5 2.5 3.0Endeavor 66.0 66.1 64.2 65.4 51.1 Endeavor 5.5 4.0 6.5 5.3Flavia 65.6 66.0 63.4 65.0 50.8 Flavia 4.5 6.0 5.0 5.2Calypso 66.3 67.4 67.2 66.9 52.3 Calypso 2.5 3.0 3.0 2.8Violetta 67.5 64.4 66.6 66.1 51.7 Violetta 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0Mean(ns) 65.5 65.2 64.7 65.1 50.9 Mean(ns) 3.2 3.7 4.0 3.6lb/b 51.2 50.9 50.6 50.9 39.8
Lodging (0-9) 27 54 81 Mean Height 27 54 81 MeanKWS Scala 0.0 2.5 5.5 2.7 KWS Scala 69 76 78 74SY Tepee 5.0 3.5 5.0 4.5 SY Tepee 78 79 81 79Endeavor 1.5 2.0 4.5 2.7 Endeavor 81 85 81 82Flavia 0.0 0.0 4.0 1.3 Flavia 68 67 73 69Calypso 1.5 1.0 4.0 2.2 Calypso 85 86 87 86Violetta 2.0 2.5 4.0 2.8 Violetta 75 77 78 76Mean* 1.7 1.9 4.5 2.7 Mean(ns) 76 78 79 78
Protein % 27 54 81 Mean** Heading Date 27 54 81 MeanKWS Scala 11.6 12.3 13.0 12.3 KWS Scala 5/29 5/27 5/27 5/27SY Tepee 11.4 12.4 12.6 12.1 SY Tepee 5/27 5/28 5/27 5/27Endeavor 11.3 12.1 12.8 12.1 Endeavor 5/27 5/28 5/27 5/27Flavia 10.5 11.8 12.1 11.5 Flavia 5/26 5/26 5/25 5/25Calypso 10.8 12.0 12.5 11.7 Calypso 5/26 5/27 5/27 5/26Violetta 11.2 12.5 13.0 12.2 Violetta 5/25 5/26 5/25 5/25Mean** 11.1 12.2 12.7 12.0 Mean(ns) 5/26 5/27 5/26 5/26
M. E. Sorrells, D. Benscher, J. Tanaka, A. Fox Dept of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Cornell UniversityFunding Sources: New York State Ag & Markets, Genesee Valley Regional Market Authority
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 7
2018 Hybrid Winter Rye Regional Trial - Cornell University
Grain Yield (kg/h) Test Lodging Winter Regional Locations Weight Score Height Surv.
Entry Sny Ket SenT SenF Mean Rank kg/hl Rank 0-9 2 Loc %1 Brasetto (180 k/m2) 6193 6851 7146 6298 6622 14 70.9 16 4.2 124 732 Brasetto (200 k/m2) 6347 6218 7562 6484 6653 13 71.1 14 4.7 128 833 Brasetto (250 k/m2) 6519 6947 7250 5643 6590 15 70.9 17 4.3 127 804 KWS H-144 (Gatano) 6490 7044 6825 4711 6267 17 70.5 20 5.7 126 535 Danko 6046 5670 4921 5009 5411 18 73.0 2 3.2 141 676 AC Hazlet 5731 5410 5154 4736 5258 19 72.2 5 2.5 140 607 KWS H-145 (KWS Binntto) 7598 7011 7138 7025 7193 7 70.5 19 3.5 126 708 KWS H-149 (KWS Dolaro) 8229 6977 6953 7144 7326 3 71.9 9 2.0 122 779 Erie (wheat ck) 4701 6112 4846 4054 4928 20 74.5 1 0.0 88 9210 KWS-H-162 (Vinetto) 7447 7173 7456 6765 7210 6 72.3 4 1.8 128 6311 KWS-H-168 (Loretto) 7582 6974 7033 6496 7021 8 71.0 15 4.7 133 7812 KWS-H 172 (Piano) 7231 6176 7512 7036 6989 9 70.7 18 3.5 123 6713 KWS Serafino 7064 6250 7011 5938 6566 16 72.0 8 3.7 131 5714 KWS-H176 8276 7543 6443 6605 7217 5 71.7 11 4.0 131 8315 KWS-H177 7319 7756 7872 6869 7454 2 71.4 12 3.0 135 6716 KWS-H178 7898 7143 7843 7099 7496 1 71.8 10 4.3 135 8217 KWS-H179 6676 6528 7634 6818 6914 10 71.3 13 4.7 135 7818 KWS-H180 7092 6659 7063 6758 6893 11 72.0 6 4.0 130 6719 KWS-H181 7429 7054 7479 7165 7282 4 72.6 3 2.2 130 7320 KWS-H182 6570 6749 7378 6521 6804 12 72.0 7 3.7 130 80
Mean 6922 6712 6926 6259 6705 71.7 3.5 128 73CV 8.3 5.9 12.7 8.7
Cumulative Summary Grain Yield Test Weight Lodging Head Height Winter 5 Year 4 Year 2 Year 2 Year 0-9 Date cm Surv.
Entry kg/h b/a kg/h b/a kg/h b/a kg/hl lb/b 2 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr1 Brasetto (180 k/m2) 6865 109 6625 106 6619 105 69.6 55.7 2.8 5/24 131 872 Brasetto (200 k/m2) 6664 106 6448 103 6557 104 69.9 56.0 3.1 5/23 134 923 Brasetto (250 k/m2) 6796 108 6497 104 6515 104 69.9 55.9 2.8 5/24 133 904 KWS H-144 (Gatano) 6581 105 6369 101 6373 102 69.3 55.4 4.2 5/21 131 775 Danko 5316 79 5045 75 5068 75 71.3 57.0 2.8 5/25 148 836 AC Hazlet 4934 79 4763 76 5074 81 70.6 56.5 2.6 5/25 154 807 KWS H-145 (KWS Binntto) 7026 112 7139 114 68.6 54.8 2.5 5/26 131 858 KWS H-149 (KWS Dolaro) 7003 112 7285 116 69.8 55.8 1.1 5/25 134 889 Erie (wheat ck) 4927 78 4411 70 68.1 54.5 1.2 5/24 93 9610 KWS-H-162 (Vinetto) 7228 115 70.8 56.6 1.3 5/22 133 8211 KWS-H-168 (Loretto) 7121 106 69.8 55.8 3.5 5/22 143 8912 KWS-H 172 (Piano) 6949 111 68.6 54.8 2.4 5/21 126 83
M.E. Sorrells, D. Benscher, J. Tanaka, Amy Fox - Department of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Cornell University
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 8
2018 GVRMA Winter Grains Summaries
Winter Grains Grain Yield (kg/h)Market Convent Mgmt Covent Organic Mgmt Organic Overall
Source Entry Type Ith-Ket Ped Mean Rank Freev Ped Mean Rank Mean Rank1 Erie Soft Red Wheat 6155 4207 5181 5 4232 4244 4238 4 4709 42 Medina Soft White Wheat 5859 3443 4651 6 3472 4606 4039 6 4345 53 Warthog Hard Red Wheat 5313 3545 4429 8 3541 3881 3711 10 4070 64 NuEast Hard Red Wheat 5048 3868 4458 7 3538 4100 3819 8 4138 75 KWS Scala Malting Barley 3608 2009 2808 12 3772 3820 3796 9 3302 116 SY Tepee Malting Barley 3440 2912 3176 11 2792 4517 3655 11 3415 127 KWS Sommerset Malting Barley 4313 2485 3399 10 3367 4288 3828 7 3613 98 Flavia Malting Barley 4155 2907 3531 9 4384 3775 4080 5 3805 89 Brasetto Hybrid Rye 6886 6059 6473 3 3950 5352 4651 2 5562 210 Danko Rye 5678 5001 5340 4 2784 3283 3033 12 4187 1011 KWS Binntto Hybrid Rye 7644 6226 6935 1 4051 5446 4748 1 5842 112 KWS Gatano Hybrid Rye 7094 6002 6548 2 4098 4846 4472 3 5510 3
Mean 5433 4055 3665 4347 4006 4375CV 8.4 16.5 12.2 19.7
Test Weight (kg/hl)Market Convent Mgmt Covent Organic Mgmt Organic Overall
Source Entry Type Ith-Ket Ped Mean Rank Freev Ped Mean Rank Mean Rank1 Erie Soft Red Wheat 76.1 76.0 76.1 3 76.5 77.1 76.8 3 76.4 32 Medina Soft White Wheat 74.9 72.8 73.8 4 73.9 74.8 74.3 4 74.1 43 Warthog Hard Red Wheat 77.8 76.7 77.2 2 76.9 76.8 76.8 2 77.0 24 NuEast Hard Red Wheat 79.7 80.3 80.0 1 79.7 79.6 79.7 1 79.8 15 KWS Scala Malting Barley 61.3 62.0 61.6 12 60.8 60.2 60.5 12 61.1 126 SY Tepee Malting Barley 64.3 64.3 64.3 10 59.7 62.3 61.0 11 62.6 107 KWS Sommerset Malting Barley 63.6 63.4 63.5 11 60.9 61.2 61.1 10 62.3 118 Flavia Malting Barley 66.2 65.5 65.8 9 61.9 60.4 61.2 9 63.5 99 Brasetto Hybrid Rye 70.5 73.3 71.9 7 67.2 72.2 69.7 6 70.8 710 Danko Rye 73.0 74.3 73.7 5 66.6 73.0 69.8 5 71.7 511 KWS Binntto Hybrid Rye 69.5 71.7 70.6 8 65.0 70.5 67.8 8 69.2 812 KWS Gatano Hybrid Rye 71.1 73.3 72.2 6 66.7 72.2 69.5 7 70.8 6
Mean 70.7 71.1 70.9 68.0 70.0 69.0 69.9
Winter HeadSurv Date
Market Convent OrganicSource Entry Type Ith-Ket Freev1 Erie Soft Red Wheat 100 5/302 Medina Soft White Wheat 100 5/313 Warthog Hard Red Wheat 100 5/304 NuEast Hard Red Wheat 100 5/275 KWS Scala Malting Barley 85 5/246 SY Tepee Malting Barley 92 5/247 KWS Sommerset Malting Barley 87 5/258 Flavia Malting Barley 88 5/229 Brasetto Hybrid Rye 9310 Danko Rye 7511 KWS Binntto Hybrid Rye 9012 KWS Gatano Hybrid Rye 88
Mean 92 5/26M. E. Sorrells, D. Benscher, J. Tanaka, A. Fox Dept of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Cornell UniversityFunding Sources: New York State Ag & Markets, Genesee Valley Regional Market Authority
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 9
2018 Spring Oat Regional and Cumulative Summaries - Cornell University
Grain Yield (kg/h) Test Wt (kg/hl) Height HeadEntry Ith-Hel Ith-Ket SteCo. GenCo. Mean Rank Mean Rank Lodging cm Date
1 OGLE 1248 2068 2606 1674 1899 20 41.9 22 2.0 78 6/302 NEWDAK 1279 2217 2085 2526 2027 17 44.0 15 6.0 88 6/283 IL00-7267(Corral) 1674 2457 2816 1580 2132 15 43.0 19 3.7 75 7/44 SD081107 1313 2016 2438 2895 2165 14 45.9 10 0.0 85 7/35 MN09255 1669 3072 3250 3131 2781 2 50.0 3 4.0 85 7/66 SD111946 1309 2657 2930 3186 2521 5 47.7 6 1.3 83 7/37 SD111922 1362 2644 2826 2813 2411 9 46.2 9 0.7 83 7/38 Hidalgo 1313 2166 2594 1618 1923 18 43.6 17 4.3 75 7/79 Vitality 1506 2090 2412 2269 2069 16 43.4 18 2.7 88 7/610 Hayden 1454 3106 3347 3293 2800 1 47.8 5 0.7 85 7/311 Streaker 678 1478 2075 1418 1412 22 62.4 1 3.0 80 6/2712 Buff 685 2031 2589 2006 1828 21 55.4 2 0.7 80 6/2613 IL10-9867 1053 2469 2423 2721 2167 13 42.0 21 0.3 75 6/2614 SD120640 1282 2963 2967 2510 2431 7 46.3 8 1.0 90 6/2715 MNBT1021-1 1379 2340 2949 3203 2468 6 44.9 12 0.3 85 6/2916 MNBT1020-1 1623 2051 3116 2901 2423 8 44.6 14 1.0 75 7/217 SD120419 1680 2221 2563 3057 2380 11 47.6 7 0.3 78 7/318 CDC Norseman 1575 2822 3341 2642 2595 4 45.7 11 1.0 83 7/419 IL12 - 9020 1676 3062 3309 2942 2747 3 48.2 4 2.3 75 6/2920 Newburg (ck) 1265 2112 3164 2888 2357 12 43.8 16 3.7 95 7/421 WIX10055-8 978 1920 2169 2605 1918 19 42.9 20 6.3 88 7/322 WIX10169-5 1434 2704 2871 2628 2409 10 44.7 13 2.3 80 7/3
Mean 1338 2394 2765 2568 2266 46.5 2.2 82 6/26CV 9.7 22.6 16.1 9.6
Cumulative Summary Grain Yield Test Weight Head Lodging Height 6 Years 4 Years 3 Years 2 Years 2 Years Date 0-9 cm
Entry kg/h b/a kg/h b/a kg/h b/a kg/h b/a kg/hl lbs/b 2 Yr 2 Yr 2 Yr1 OGLE 2508 70 2383 66 2115 59 2138 60 40.9 32.0 6/26 1.5 792 NEWDAK 2671 74 2379 66 2205 61 2203 61 42.9 33.5 6/26 4.0 883 IL00-7267(Corral) 2731 76 2470 69 2093 58 2064 58 41.1 32.1 6/29 2.8 784 SD081107 2904 81 2662 74 2284 64 2373 66 44.0 34.3 6/30 0.0 855 MN09255 2970 83 2799 78 2473 69 2614 73 47.0 36.7 7/2 2.0 886 SD111946 2846 79 2548 71 2694 75 45.2 35.3 6/29 0.9 847 SD111922 2840 79 2509 70 2635 73 44.2 34.5 6/29 0.3 858 Hidalgo 2275 63 1895 53 1849 52 41.4 32.4 7/4 4.2 799 Vitality 2081 58 2012 56 41.9 32.7 7/4 4.1 9110 Hayden 2594 72 2852 80 45.4 35.5 6/30 0.3 8611 Streaker 1734 48 1523 42 57.5 44.9 6/25 4.5 8412 Buff 1854 52 1910 53 52.0 40.6 6/24 1.3 8413 IL10-9867 2403 67 2510 70 41.5 32.4 6/25 0.4 7914 SD120640 2494 70 2681 75 44.0 34.4 6/26 0.5 9415 MNBT1021-1 2670 74 42.7 33.4 6/26 1.2 8816 MNBT1020-1 2765 77 43.3 33.8 6/28 0.9 7917 SD120419 2633 73 44.3 34.6 6/29 0.5 8018 CDC Norseman 2806 78 43.7 34.2 7/1 1.9 89M. E. Sorrells, D. Benscher, A. Fox, J. Tanaka - Department of Plant Breeding & Genetics - Cornell University
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 10
2
018
Spri
ng M
altin
g B
arle
y R
egio
nal S
umm
ary
- Cor
nell
Uni
vers
ity
Gra
in Y
ield
(kg/
h)Te
stPr
ehar
vSp
otFH
BFH
BFH
BKe
rnel
onM
alt
Barle
yBe
taAl
l Malt
Regio
nal L
ocat
ions
Wei
ght
Lodg
Head
Heig
htSp
rout
Blot
chRu
stIn
cSe
vIn
dex
DON
Wt.
6/64
Extra
ctPr
otei
nDP
Glu
can
FAN
Qua
lity
Entry
Row#
Clas
sIth
-Hel
Ith-K
etSt
eCo.
Gen
Co.
Mea
nRa
nkKg
/hl
Rank
0-9
Date
cm0-
9Ra
nk0-
90-
9%
%%
Rank
ppm
(mg)
%%
%AS
BCpp
mpp
mSc
ore
1Co
nlon
2M
alt
1346
1883
3089
569
1722
1959
.016
N6/
2571
4.5
225
637
83.
44
8.1
42.2
96.3
78.1
12.9
6163
322
027
2Qu
est
6M
alt
2900
3728
3692
618
2734
559
.513
O6/
2679
2.4
33
225
92.
02
5.8
32.7
89.5
78.8
11.8
8562
022
7N/
A3
KWS
Tink
a2
Mal
t12
5218
9030
8755
816
9720
57.5
20N
7/2
682.
76
40
3010
3.3
36.
838
.596
.677
.912
.469
355
260
254
ND G
enes
is2
Mal
t15
3526
2440
2911
8823
4412
60.0
9E
6/30
714.
018
33
4812
5.9
105.
741
.896
.379
.211
.367
605
206
345
Harm
ony
6Fe
ed24
2333
0137
1710
9526
347
57.0
217/
283
4.0
192
258
169.
519
4.1
37.2
95.3
75.1
11.7
5057
121
1N/
A6
Ocea
nik
6Fe
ed30
0138
5344
1111
1030
943
58.3
186/
3082
2.1
22
145
167.
112
5.1
38.8
94.1
76.7
11.6
4865
016
3N/
A7
AAC
Syne
rgy
2M
alt
1591
3241
3744
986
2390
1159
.015
7/1
724.
120
32
2517
4.3
78.
341
.691
.180
.111
.879
184
260
328
Newd
ale
2M
alt
1505
2908
3727
1170
2328
1460
.28
7/2
693.
616
30
3722
8.3
145.
438
.696
.679
.612
.310
725
524
234
9KW
S 15
/371
62
Mal
t11
1121
2733
9010
8119
2716
57.7
197/
459
2.8
75
040
93.
65
5.2
40.0
97.4
79.9
10.8
6918
225
139
1009
N2-6
72
Mal
t19
0334
0036
7591
924
748
60.5
57/
474
4.1
213
220
71.
71
6.4
41.6
97.2
79.2
12.2
6634
922
034
1108
MT-
032
Mal
t18
6127
1333
7316
2723
9310
62.6
17/
471
3.4
144
032
225.
29
4.1
41.4
91.5
79.2
12.6
7036
421
535
12KW
S Je
ssie
2M
alt
2107
4055
4595
1758
3129
258
.717
6/26
602.
88
50
6512
8.3
159
40.3
89.0
80.4
11.0
6978
244
2813
KWS
Chris
sie
2M
alt
2130
3924
4440
1835
3082
460
.27
6/26
623.
415
60
8317
14.3
227.
141
.293
.380
.210
.758
228
229
3314
LCS
Oper
a2
Mal
t24
8642
4551
1723
5335
501
59.6
126/
3062
2.9
96
047
136.
011
11.8
38.4
94.4
81.8
10.2
5945
123
135
15LC
S Si
enna
2M
alt
2137
3272
4029
1237
2669
660
.72
7/3
703.
817
51
5516
9.1
183.
940
.394
.580
.211
.061
304
245
3316
Expl
orer
2M
alt
1895
2642
4148
1047
2433
959
.810
7/2
601.
31
50
4717
8.4
166
41.9
92.7
78.3
12.2
7217
122
143
172N
D337
572
Mal
t11
5222
3331
6586
618
5418
60.6
47/
372
2.9
114
745
2310
.020
11.3
40.0
96.5
79.8
11.5
5331
223
040
182N
D337
602
Mal
t19
6328
4136
2888
323
2913
60.2
66/
2970
2.5
44
438
124.
58
8.5
42.3
95.0
80.0
11.4
6136
122
240
19DH
1309
10 (F
ac)
2M
alt
1824
2735
2873
1562
2249
1560
.73
6/28
592.
65
50
5215
8.0
137.
447
.891
.576
.014
.299
330
236
1820
DH13
1055
(Fac
)2
Mal
t11
1016
7426
2213
5416
9021
59.1
147/
159
3.4
136
147
168.
417
6.5
48.0
91.2
74.6
15.6
105
375
249
1621
DH13
1742
(Fac
)2
Mal
t95
414
1827
9829
413
6622
59.6
117/
366
3.0
124
040
93.
96
6.1
42.8
96.9
77.4
12.2
9425
329
713
22DH
1309
35 (F
ac)
2M
alt
1645
2223
2538
1226
1908
1756
.722
6/25
522.
910
74
7014
10.1
213.
942
.091
.375
.713
.982
367
226
22M
ean
1810
2860
3631
1152
2363
59.4
6/30
683.
14.
11.
744
.814
.16.
640
.994
.078
.612
.172
364
232
CV14
.317
.79.
925
.1Cu
mul
ativ
e Su
mm
ary
PreH
arv
FHB
FHB
FHB
Kern
elon
Mal
tBa
rley
Beta
All M
alt
Gra
in Y
ield
Tes
t Wei
ght
Head
Lodg
.Ht
.Sp
rout
Inc
Sev
Indx
DON
Wt.
6/64
Extra
ctPr
otei
nDP
Glu
can
FAN
Qua
lity
3 Y
ears
2 Y
ears
2 Y
ears
Date
0-9
cm0-
9%
%%
ppm
(mg)
%%
%AS
BCpp
mpp
mSc
ore
Entry
Row#
Clas
skg
/hb/
akg
/hb/
akg
/hl
lbs/
b2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr2
Yr1
Conl
on2
Mal
t20
6738
2256
4260
.046
.96/
220
703.
447
115.
35.
642
.397
80.5
12.3
8148
822
532
2Qu
est
6M
alt
2513
4727
9752
59.7
46.7
6/23
077
1.5
4011
4.4
4.7
32.5
9280
.511
.188
448
218
NA3
KWS
Tink
a2
Mal
t23
7244
2427
4558
.045
.36/
290
672.
452
127.
16.
240
.896
80.8
11.2
8222
524
033
4ND
Gen
esis
2M
alt
2494
4628
6353
60.5
47.3
6/25
073
3.3
5714
9.1
5.6
42.1
9781
.810
.385
356
208
365
Harm
ony
6Fe
ed25
2947
2838
5357
.444
.86/
280
892.
960
169.
54.
137
.894
76.7
11.1
6447
321
4NA
6Oc
eani
k6
Feed
2933
5533
2562
57.9
45.2
6/27
085
1.4
6515
10.0
5.1
38.7
9378
.510
.657
492
174
NA7
AAC
Syne
rgy
2M
alt
2680
5029
7455
59.4
46.4
6/28
073
4.2
3313
3.9
8.6
40.8
9382
.110
.899
126
251
358
Newd
ale
2M
alt
2367
4426
9050
60.1
47.0
6/30
069
4.5
5018
9.0
5.1
36.9
9281
.311
.311
218
023
834
9KW
S 15
/371
62
Mal
t25
9948
57.7
45.1
6/30
061
2.0
3812
4.2
6.4
38.8
9381
.79.
961
114
232
3810
09N2
-67
2M
alt
3027
5661
.147
.76/
290
762.
738
94.
36.
041
.496
81.0
11.5
6925
021
833
1108
MT-
032
Mal
t28
7553
62.9
49.2
6/30
070
2.3
4820
8.6
4.6
41.4
9381
.611
.567
241
209
37M
. E. S
orre
lls,
D. B
ensc
her,
J. T
anak
a, A
. Fox
Dep
artm
ent o
f Pla
nt B
reed
ing
& Ge
netic
s, C
orne
ll Un
iver
sity
Fu
ndin
g So
urce
s: N
ew Y
ork
Stat
e Ag
& M
arke
ts, G
enes
ee V
alle
y Re
gion
al M
arke
t Aut
horit
y
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 11
2018 Spring Malting Barley Fertility Trial - Cornell University
Nitrogen Rates (lbs/a) Nitrogen Rates (lbs/a)Grain Yield (kg/h) 27 54 81 98 Mean(ns) b/a Height (cm) 27 54 81 98 Mean(ns)AAC Synergy 3752 3442 3328 3649 3543 66 AAC Synergy 76 77 79 78.0 77.7Newdale 3039 2734 3257 2961 2998 56 Newdale 74 72 72 76.7 73.8KWS Tinka 2410 2937 2395 2692 2608 48 KWS Tinka 74 72 71 74.3 72.8ND Genesis 2986 2972 3107 2787 2963 55 ND Genesis 73 77 75 75.0 75.1Mean(ns) 3047 3021 3022 3022 3028 56 Mean(ns) 74.3 74.5 74.5 76.0 74.8b/a 57 56 56 56 56 cv=18.5
Test Weight (kg/hl) 27 54 81 98 Mean lb/b Heading Date 27 54 81 98 Mean**AAC Synergy 62.2 60.9 60.3 61.3 61.2 47.8 AAC Synergy 7/1 7/1 7/2 7/2 7/1Newdale 60.9 61.7 59.5 61.1 60.8 47.5 Newdale 7/6 7/3 7/3 7/5 7/4KWS Tinka 61.9 61.1 60.6 60.6 61.0 47.7 KWS Tinka 7/3 7/3 7/2 7/4 7/3ND Genesis 61.7 60.4 60.2 60.5 60.7 47.4 ND Genesis 6/27 6/27 6/27 6/28 6/27Mean(ns) 61.7 61.0 60.1 60.9 60.9 47.6 Mean(ns) 7/1 7/1 7/1 7/2 7/1lb/b 48.2 47.7 47.0 47.6 47.6 37.2
Lodging (0-9) 27 54 81 98 Mean(ns) Beta-Glucan ppm 27 54 81 98 Mean(ns)AAC Synergy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 AAC Synergy NA NA NA NANewdale 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Newdale NA NA NA NAKWS Tinka 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 KWS Tinka NA NA NA NAND Genesis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ND Genesis NA NA NA NAMean* 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mean(ns)
Protein % 27 54 81 98 Mean** FAN ppm 27 54 81 98 Mean(ns)AAC Synergy 11.5 11.3 11.4 11.9 11.6 AAC Synergy NA NA NA NANewdale 11.3 11.3 12.1 12.0 11.7 Newdale NA NA NA NAKWS Tinka 11.9 11.8 12.2 12.5 12.1 KWS Tinka NA NA NA NAND Genesis 11.1 10.7 11.1 11.3 11.1 ND Genesis NA NA NA NAMean** 11.5 11.3 11.7 11.9 11.6 Mean(ns)
M. E. Sorrells, D. Benscher, J. Tanaka, A. Fox Dept of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Cornell UniversityFunding Sources: New York State Ag & Markets, Genesee Valley Regional Market Authority
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 12
Effic
acy
of fu
ngic
ides
for w
heat
dis
ease
con
trol
bas
ed o
n ap
prop
riate
app
licat
ion
timin
g*
*C
ompi
led
by G
ary
C. B
ergs
trom
, Cor
nell
Uni
vers
ity (M
ay 2
019)
New
pro
duct
s in
201
9 Fu
ngic
ide(
s)
Pow
dery
m
ildew
St
agon
ospo
ra
leaf
/glu
me
blot
ch
Sept
oria
leaf
bl
otch
Ta
n sp
ot
Strip
e ru
st
Leaf
rust
Stem
rust
Fusa
rium
he
ad
blig
ht9
Har
vest
R
estr
ictio
n C
lass
A
ctiv
e in
gred
ient
Pr
oduc
t R
ate/
A (
fl.
oz)
Strobi-lurin
pico
xyst
robi
n 22
.5%
A
proa
ch S
C6,
7 6.
0 - 1
2 G
V
G
VG
V
G
E1
VG
V
G
NL
Feek
es 1
0.5
fuox
ystr
obin
40.
3%
Evito
480
SC
4,,6
,7,8
2.0
– 4.
0 G
--
--
V
G
--
VG
--
N
L Fe
ekes
10.
5 an
d 40
day
s
pyra
clos
trob
in 2
3.3%
H
eadl
ine
SC
6.0
- 9.0
G
V
G
VG
E
E
1 E
G
N
L
Feek
es 1
0.5
Triazole
met
cona
zole
8.6
%
Car
amba
0.7
5 SL
10
.0 -
17.0
V
G
VG
--
V
G
E
E
E
G
30
day
s
prop
icon
azol
e 41
.8%
Ti
lt 3.
6 EC
G
ener
ics
4.0
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
VG
P
Feek
es 1
0.5
prot
hioc
onaz
ole
41%
Pr
olin
e 48
0 SC
5.
0 - 5
.73
--2
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
G
30
day
s
prot
hioc
onaz
ole1
9%
tebu
cona
zole
19%
Pr
osar
o 42
1 SC
4 6.
5 - 8
.2
G
VG
V
G
VG
E
E
E
G
30 d
ays
Mixed modes of action5
tebu
cona
zole
22.
6%
trifl
oxys
trob
in 2
2.6%
A
bsol
ute
500
SC4
3.3
G
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
NL
35 d
ays
cypr
acon
azol
e 7.
17%
pi
coxy
stro
bin
17.9
4%
Apr
oach
Prim
a SC
6,7
3.4-
6.8
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
E
VG
V
G
NL
45 d
ays
prop
icon
azol
e 11
.7%
az
oxys
trob
in 7
.0%
Ava
ris 2
00 S
C
14
.0
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
E
E
VG
N
L Fe
ekes
10.
5
fluox
astr
obin
14.
8%
flutr
iafo
l 19.
3%
Fort
ix4,
6,7,
8 4.
0 –
6.0
--
--
VG
V
G
E
VG
V
G
NL
Feek
es 1
0.5
and
40 d
ays
pydi
flum
etof
en 1
3.7%
pr
opic
onaz
ole
11.4
%
Mira
vis
Ace
SE
Pend
ing
in N
YS
13.7
V
G
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
G
Feek
es 1
0.54
fluap
yrox
ad 2
.8%
py
racl
ostr
obin
18.
7%
prop
icon
azol
e 11
.7%
N
exic
or E
C6,
7,
7.0
– 13
.0
G
VG
V
G
E
E
E
VG
N
L Fe
ekes
10.
5
fluxa
pyro
xad
14.3
%
pyra
clos
trob
in 2
8.6
%
Pr
iaxo
r4 ,7
4.0
– 8.
0 G
V
G
VG
E
V
G
VG
G
N
L Fe
ekes
10.
5
prop
icon
azol
e 11
.7%
az
oxys
trob
in 1
3.5%
Q
uilt
Xcel
2.2
SE
Afr
ame
Plus
2.2
SE
10
.5 -
14.0
V
G
VG
V
G
VG
E
E
V
G
NL
Feek
es 1
0.5
prot
hioc
onaz
ole
16.0
%
trifl
oxys
trob
in 1
3.7%
D
elar
o 32
5 SC
4 8.
0 G
V
G
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
VG
N
L Fe
ekes
10.
5 35
day
s
prot
hioc
onaz
ole
10.8
%
trifl
oxys
trob
in 3
2.3%
St
rate
go Y
LD4
4.0
G
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
VG
V
G
NL
Feek
es 1
0.5
35 d
ays
be
nzov
indi
flupy
r 2.9
%
prop
icon
azol
e 11
.9%
az
oxys
trob
in 1
0.5%
Tr
ivap
ro S
E4 9.
4 –
13.7
V
G
VG
V
G
VG
E
E
V
G
NL
Feek
es 1
0.5
and
14
days
met
cona
zole
7.4
%
pyra
clos
trob
in 1
2%
Twin
Line
1.7
5 EC
4 7.
0 –
9.0
G
VG
V
G
E
E
E
VG
N
L
Feek
es 1
0.5
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 13
* Ada
pted
for N
ew Y
ork
by G
ary
C. B
ergs
trom
from
info
rmat
ion
deve
lope
d by
the
USD
A-N
IFA
Com
mitt
ee o
n M
anag
emen
t of S
mal
l Gra
in C
erea
l Dis
ease
s (N
CER
A-18
4). T
his
info
rmat
ion
is
prov
ided
onl
y as
a g
uide
. It
is th
e re
spon
sibi
lity
of th
e pe
stic
ide
appl
icat
or b
y la
w to
read
and
follo
w a
ll cu
rrent
labe
l dire
ctio
ns.
No
endo
rsem
ent i
s in
tend
ed fo
r pro
duct
s lis
ted,
nor
is c
ritic
ism
m
eant
for p
rodu
cts
not l
iste
d. M
embe
rs o
r par
ticip
ants
in th
e N
CER
A-18
4 co
mm
ittee
ass
ume
no li
abilit
y re
sulti
ng fr
om th
e us
e of
thes
e pr
oduc
ts.
Effic
acy
cate
gorie
s: N
L=N
ot L
abel
ed a
nd
Not
Rec
omm
ende
d; P
=Poo
r; F=
Fair;
G=G
ood;
VG
=Ver
y G
ood;
E=E
xcel
lent
. 1 Ef
ficac
y m
ay b
e si
gnifi
cant
ly re
duce
d if
solo
stro
bilu
rin p
rodu
cts
are
appl
ied
afte
r stri
pe ru
st in
fect
ion
has
occu
rred.
2 I
nsuf
ficie
nt d
ata
to m
ake
stat
emen
t abo
ut e
ffica
cy o
f thi
s pr
oduc
t 3 R
ates
of 5
.0 to
5.7
fl o
z ar
e la
bele
d on
ly fo
r app
licat
ions
at f
low
erin
g to
sup
pres
s Fu
sariu
m h
ead
blig
ht; L
ower
rate
s of
4.3
-5.0
fl o
z ar
e la
bele
d fo
r app
licat
ions
to c
ontro
l fol
iar a
nd s
tem
di
seas
es.
4 Aer
ial a
pplic
atio
n is
not
allo
wed
in N
ew Y
ork.
5 P
rodu
cts
with
mix
ed m
odes
of a
ctio
n ge
nera
lly c
ombi
ne tr
iazo
le a
nd s
trobi
lurin
act
ive
ingr
edie
nts.
Nex
icor
, Pria
xor,
and
Triv
apro
incl
ude
carb
oxam
ide
activ
e in
gred
ient
s.
6 Thi
s pr
oduc
t is
not f
or s
ale,
dis
tribu
tion,
or a
pplic
atio
n in
Nas
sau
or S
uffo
lk C
ount
ies.
7 A
eria
l app
licat
ion
of th
is p
rodu
ct is
not
allo
wed
with
in 1
00 fe
et o
f sur
face
wat
ers.
8 A
pplic
atio
n of
this
pro
duct
is n
ot a
llow
ed w
ithin
100
feet
of c
oast
al m
arsh
. 9 A
pplic
atio
n of
pro
duct
s co
ntai
ning
stro
bilu
rin a
ctiv
e in
gred
ient
s m
ay re
sult
in e
leva
ted
leve
ls o
f the
myc
otox
in d
eoxy
niva
leno
l (D
ON
) in
grai
n da
mag
ed b
y he
ad s
cab.
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 14
Fu
ngic
ides
Reg
iste
red
for C
ontr
ol o
f Im
port
ant B
arle
y D
isea
ses
in N
ew Y
ork
*C
ompi
led
by G
ary
C. B
ergs
trom
, Cor
nell
Uni
vers
ity (M
ay 2
019)
New
pro
duct
s in
201
9
Fung
icid
e(s)
Pow
dery
m
ildew
S
tago
nosp
ora
blot
ch
Net
bl
otch
S
pot
blot
ch
Sca
ld
Rus
ts
(Puc
cini
a sp
p.)
Sup
pres
sion
of
Fu
sari
um
head
blig
ht1
Rat
e/A
(f
l. oz
.)
Late
st g
row
th
stag
e or
day
s to
ha
rves
t re
stri
ctio
n
Cla
ss
Act
ive
ingr
edie
nt
Pro
duct
Rat
e/A
(f
l. oz
) Fo
liar
/ ste
m
dise
ases
A
eria
l app
licat
ion
in N
YS
?
Strobilurin
pico
xyst
robi
n 22
.5%
A
proa
ch S
C2,
3 6.
0 - 1
2 Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö
N
L Fe
ekes
10.
5 Y
es, a
eria
l app
l.2
fluox
ystr
obin
E
vito
480
SC
2,3
,4
2.0
– 4.
0 Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö
N
L Fe
ekes
10.
5 an
d 40
day
s N
o ae
rial
app
l.
pyra
clos
trob
in 2
3.3%
H
eadl
ine
SC
6.
0 - 9
.0
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö
Ö
NL
Fe
ekes
10.
3
Yes
, aer
ial a
ppl.2
Triazole
met
cona
zole
8.6
%
Car
amba
0.7
5 S
L 10
.0 -
14.0
Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö
G
ood
effic
acy1
13
.5 -
17.0
30
day
s
Yes
, aer
ial a
ppl.
prop
icon
azol
e 41
.8%
Ti
lt 3.
6 E
C
Gen
eric
s
4.0
2.0
– 4.
0 (e
arly
se
ason
su
ppre
ssio
n)
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö
Ö
Poo
r ef
ficac
y1
4.0
45 d
ays
Y
es, a
eria
l app
l.
prot
hioc
onaz
ole
41%
P
rolin
e 48
0 S
C
2.8
- 4.3
Ö
NL
Ö Ö
Ö
Ö
Goo
d ef
ficac
y1
5.0
- 5.7
32
day
s
Yes
, aer
ial a
ppl.
prot
hioc
onaz
ole1
9%
tebu
cona
zole
19%
P
rosa
ro 4
21 S
C
6.5
- 8.2
Ö
NL
Ö Ö
Ö
Ö
Goo
d ef
ficac
y1
6.5
– 8.
2
30
day
s
No
aeri
al a
ppl.
Mixed class
tebu
cona
zole
22.
6%
trifl
oxys
trob
in 2
2.6%
A
bsol
ute
500
SC
3.
3 Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö
N
L
35 d
ays
N
o ae
rial
app
l.
tebu
cona
zole
22.
6%
trifl
oxys
trob
in 2
2.6%
A
bsol
ute
500
SC
3.
3 Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö
N
L
35 d
ays
N
o ae
rial
app
l.
prop
icon
azol
e 11
.7%
az
oxys
trob
in 7
.0%
A
vari
s 20
0 S
C
Qui
lt 20
0 S
C
10.5
- 14
.0
7.0
– 14
.0 (e
arly
se
ason
su
ppre
ssio
n)
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö
Ö
NL
45 d
ays
Y
es, a
eria
l app
l.
prot
hioc
onaz
ole
16.0
%
trifl
oxys
trob
in 1
3.7%
D
elar
o 32
5 S
C4
5.7
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö
Ö
NL
40 d
ays
N
o ae
rial
app
l.
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 15
pydi
flum
etof
en 1
3.7%
pr
opic
onaz
ole
11.4
%
Mira
vis
Ace
SE
Pend
ing
in N
YS
13.7
Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö G
ood
effic
acy1
13.7
Fe
ekes
10.
54
fluap
yrox
ad 2
.8%
py
racl
ostr
obin
18.
7%
prop
icon
azol
e 11
.7%
N
exic
or E
C6,
7,
7.0
– 13
.0
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
NL
Feek
es 1
0.5
fluxa
pyro
xad
14.3
%
pyra
clos
trob
in 2
8.6%
Pr
iaxo
r2,3
4.0
– 8.
0 Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö N
L Fe
ekes
10.
5 Ye
s, a
eria
l app
l.2
prop
icon
azol
e 11
.7%
az
oxys
trob
in 1
3.5%
Q
uilt
Xcel
2.2
SE
Afr
ame
Plus
SE
10.5
- 14
.0
7.0
– 14
.0 (e
arly
se
ason
su
ppre
ssio
n)
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
NL
45 d
ays
Ye
s, a
eria
l app
l.
prot
hioc
onaz
ole
10.8
%
trifl
oxys
trob
in 3
2.3%
St
rate
go Y
LD
2.3
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
NL
35
day
s
No
aeria
l app
l. be
nzov
indi
flupy
r 2.9
%
prop
icon
azol
e 11
.9%
az
oxys
trob
in 1
0.5%
Tr
ivap
ro S
E 9.
4 –
13.7
Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö N
L 45
day
s
No
aeria
l app
l.
met
cona
zole
7.4
%
pyra
clos
trob
in 1
2%
Twin
Line
1.7
5 EC
7.
0 –
9.0
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
Ö Ö
NL
Fe
ekes
10.
5
No
aeria
l app
l. * Th
is in
form
atio
n is
pro
vide
d as
a g
uide
for t
he c
onve
nien
ce o
f bar
ley
prod
ucer
s in
New
Yor
k. R
egis
tratio
ns a
re g
rant
ed a
nd
with
draw
n an
d la
bels
are
cha
nged
con
tinuo
usly
. No
endo
rsem
ent i
s in
tend
ed fo
r pro
duct
s lis
ted,
nor
is c
ritic
ism
mea
nt fo
r pro
duct
s no
t lis
ted.
It is
the
resp
onsi
bilit
y of
the
pest
icid
e ap
plic
ator
by
law
to re
ad a
nd fo
llow
all
curre
nt la
bel d
irect
ions
and
rest
rictio
ns. A
Ö m
ark
indi
cate
s th
at c
ontro
l of a
dis
ease
is in
clud
ed o
n th
e pr
oduc
t lab
el w
here
as N
L in
dica
tes
it is
not
a la
bele
d us
e.
1 Sta
tem
ents
of r
elat
ive
effic
acy
for s
uppr
essi
on o
f Fus
ariu
m h
ead
blig
ht s
ever
ity a
nd re
duct
ion
of c
onta
min
atio
n of
gra
in b
y th
e m
ycot
oxin
, deo
xyni
vale
nol,
are
base
d on
con
sens
us re
sear
ch o
bser
vatio
ns b
y m
embe
rs o
f the
USD
A-N
IFA
Com
mitt
ee o
n M
anag
emen
t of S
mal
l Gra
in C
erea
ls (N
CER
A-1
84);
mem
bers
of N
CER
A-18
4 as
sum
e no
liab
ility
resu
lting
from
use
of t
hese
pro
duct
s.
2 Aer
ial a
pplic
atio
n is
allo
wed
exc
ept w
ithin
100
feet
of s
urfa
ce w
ater
s.
3 Thi
s pr
oduc
t is
not f
or s
ale,
dis
tribu
tion,
or a
pplic
atio
n in
Nas
sau
or S
uffo
lk C
ount
ies.
4 A
pplic
atio
n of
this
pro
duct
is n
ot a
llow
ed w
ithin
100
feet
of a
coa
stal
mar
sh.
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 16
WHEAT (Triticum aestivum, ‘Erie’, ‘Hilliard’, ‘Pioneer 25R25’, ‘Pioneer 25R40’) Fusarium head blight (scab); Fusarium graminearum
J.K. Starr, K.L. Myers, A. Lugo-Torres, L.A. Kane, J.A. Cummings and G.C. Bergstrom, Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, and P.J. Stachowski, Cornell Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Evaluation of integrated methods for management of Fusarium head blight and foliar diseases of winter wheat in New York, 2018.
The trial was conducted at Musgrave Research Farm in Aurora, NY in a Lima silt loam soil planted in a field that was fallow in 2016 and was cropped to corn in 2015. The field was planted on 29 Sep 2017 with four soft red winter wheat varieties, ‘Erie’ (moderately susceptible to Fusarium Head Blight (FHB)), ‘Hilliard’ (moderately resistant to FHB), ‘Pioneer Brand 25R25’ (moderately resistant to FHB), and ‘Pioneer Brand 25R40’ (moderately susceptible to FHB). The experiment was set up as a completely randomized block design with a split-plot arrangement, with cultivar as the main plot and the treatments as subplots, randomized in four replicated blocks. Main plots were sown with wheat at 120 lb/A with a 10-ft wide commercial no till grain drill. Subplots were 20 × 10 ft. The plots were fertilized at planting (200 lb/A of 10-20-20) and topdressed on 23 Apr (60 lb/A of urea, providing an additional 27.6 lb/A of nitrogen). A treatment of Miravis Ace was applied on 1 Jun at Feekes growth stage (FGS) 10.3. Treatments of Miravis Ace or Caramba were applied on 3 Jun at anthesis or FGS 10.51. A treatment of Prosaro was applied on 7 Jun at FGS 10.53. Each of the fungicidal treatments included the non-ionic surfactant Induce at a rate of 0.125% vv. A spray inoculation of a conidial suspension of Fusarium graminearum (40,000 spores/ml) was conducted after the fungicide had dried to enhance the development of Fusarium head blight (FHB). Fungicide treatments and F. graminearum inoculum were applied by a tractor-mounted CO2 sprayer with TeeJet-AI3070 nozzles, 20-in. apart, pressurized at 40 psi, and calibrated to deliver 20 gal/A at 3 MPH. Incidence and severity (percent of symptomatic spikelets on symptomatic heads) of FHB in each plot were rated on 21 Jun and used to calculate FHB Index, where FHB index = (FHB severity * FHB incidence)/100. Foliar diseases were rated on 21 Jun as percent severity on flag leaves (average rating for whole plot). Grain was harvested on 16 Jul from a 20 × 5 ft area in each subplot using a SP20 Almaco plot combine. Grain moisture, plot yield, and test weight were recorded. Yield and test weight were adjusted to bu/A and lb/bu, respectively, at 13.5% moisture. Fusarium damaged kernels (FDK) were evaluated post-harvest as a percentage of kernels visibly affected by FHB out of a 100 kernel subsample from each plot. Analysis of deoxynivalenol (DON) concentration (ppm) in grain was conducted in the Mycotoxin Analysis Laboratory at the University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN with support from the U.S. Wheat and Barley Research Initiative. Treatment means were calculated, subjected to analysis of variance, and separated by Tukey-Kramer HSD test (P = 0.05).
Warm, dry conditions prevailed through flowering and grain forming stages, thus were conducive to low foliar disease and low levels of DON. Fusarium head blight severity was significantly higher in Erie and lowest in Pioneer 25R25. Although the FHB severity was highest in Erie, the test weight also was highest in Erie and significantly lower in Pioneer 25R25. When the cultivars were analyzed separately, both Miravis Ace treatments and Prosaro applied at FGS 10.53 reduced FHB incidence in Erie. Test weight in Erie was higher in the Miravis Ace applied early treatment and lower in the Prosaro applied early treatment. In Pioneer 25R40, FHB severity was reduced in the Prosaro applied late treatment. When the treatments were averaged across cultivars, FHB incidence, FHB index and DON were lower for both Miravis Ace treatments and Prosaro applied at FGS 10.53. The DON for all treatments and varieties was below the 1 ppm threshold. In a year with low disease and mycotoxin pressure, each of the fungicides and application timings reduced DON and FHB variables.
Plant Disease Management Reports 13:CF064 Page 1
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 17
Cultivar, treatment, and amount/A
FHB Incidence
(%)
FHB Severity
(%)
FHB Index
FDK (%)
DON (ppm)
Test weight
(lb/bu)
Yield (bu/A)
Hilliard
Non-treated 7.5 a 15.0 ab 1.1 a 0.8 a 0.4 a 62.4 a 80.7 a
Miravis Ace (13.7 fl oz) at FGS 10.3 4.5 a 18.8 a 1.3 a 0.8 a 0.3 a 62.4 a 82.5 a
Miravis Ace (13.7 fl oz) at FGS 10.51 3.5 a 13.8 a 0.7 a 0.3 a 0.3 a 62.5 a 82.1 a
Prosaro 421SC (6.5 fl oz) at FGS 10.51 4.5 a 20.0 a 0.9 a 0.5 a 0.4 a 62.4 a 88.3 a
Prosaro 421SC (6.5 fl oz) at FGS 10.53 4.0 a 13.8 a 0.7 a 0.5 a 0.2 a 62.4 a 89.3 a
HSD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
CV (%) 73.3 47.75 105.44 138.03 83.08 0.51 8.66
Erie
Non-treated 8.5 a 36.3 a 3.1 a 1.8 a 0.5 a 62.4 b 90.1a
Miravis Ace (13.7 fl oz) at FGS 10.3 1.5 b 11.3 a 0.4 b 0.5 a 0.1 b 62.8 a 82.2 a
Miravis Ace (13.7 fl oz) at FGS 10.51 3.0 b 11.3 a 0.5 b 0.0 a 0.2 b 62.6 ab 75.1 a
Prosaro 421SC (6.5 fl oz) at FGS 10.51 5.0 ab 25.0 a 1.6 ab 1.0 a 0.2 b 62.4 b 68.2 a
Prosaro 421SC (6.5 fl oz) at FGS 10.53 3.0 b 20.0 a 0.7 b 0.5 a 0.1 b 62.5 ab 82.6 a
HSD (P=0.05) 5.25 NS 2.06 NS 0.29 0.28 NS
CV (%) 81.61 82.83 112.70 206.90 97.67 0.38 16.45
Pioneer 25R25
Non-treated 5.5 a 22.5 a 1.6 a 0.8 a 0.6 a 61.3 a 78.3 a
Miravis Ace (13.7 fl oz) at FGS 10.3 2.0 a 10.0 a 0.3 a 1.0 a 0.1 b 61.6 a 80.5 a
Miravis Ace (13.7 fl oz) at FGS 10.51 1.0 a 6.3 a 0.1 a 0.8 a 0.2 ab 62.6 a 83.3 a
Prosaro 421SC (6.5 fl oz) at FGS 10.51 1.0 a 2.5 ab 0.1 a 1.5 a 0.3 ab 60.5 a 81.2 a
Prosaro 421SC (6.5 fl oz) at FGS 10.53 1.0 a 3.8 a 0.2 a 0.5 a 0.2 ab 62.5 a 92.1 a
HSD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS 0.39 NS NS
CV (%) 173.35 131.96 134.39 101.32 100.15 2.91 12.02
Pioneer 25R40
Non-treated 5.5 a 21.3 a 1.8 a 0.5 a 0.2 a 62.5 a 84.2 a
Miravis Ace (13.7 fl oz) at FGS 10.3 2.0 a 10.0 ab 0.4 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 62.6 a 80.8 a
Miravis Ace (13.7 fl oz) at FGS 10.51 3.5 a 15.0 ab 1.1 a 0.8 a 0.1 a 61.6 a 88.3 a
Prosaro 421SC (6.5 fl oz) at FGS 10.51 4..0 a 15.0 ab 1.0 a 1.0 a 0.2 a 62.5 a 84.2 a
Prosaro 421SC (6.5 fl oz) at FGS 10.53 1.0 a 5.0 b 0.1 a 0.5 a 0.1 a 62.6 a 80.4 a
HSD (P=0.05) NS 13.41 NS NS NS NS NS
CV (%) 127.28 103.36 156.82 109.96 97.21 1.59 7.53
Cultivar mean
Erie 4.2 a 20.8 a 1.2 a 0.9 a 0.2 a 62.5 a 79.7 a
Hilliard 4.8 a 16.3 ab 0.9 a 0.8 a 0.3 a 62.4 ab 84.6 a
Pioneer 25R25 2.1 a 9.0 b 0.5 a 0.6 a 0.3 a 61.8 b 83.1 a
Pioneer 25R40 2.3 a 13.3 ab 0.9 a 0.6 a 0.1 a 62.4 ab 83.6 a
HSD (P=0.05) NS 10.27 NS NS NS 0.75 NS
CV (%) 104.83 91.38 140.67 147.46 98.09 1.73 11.54
Treatment mean
Non-treated 6.8 a 23.8 a 1.9 a 0.9 a 0.4 a 62.2 a 83.3 a
Miravis Ace (13.7 fl oz) at FGS 10.3 2.5 b 12.5 a 0.6 b 0.6 a 0.2 b 62.3 a 81.5 a
Miravis Ace (13.7 fl oz) at FGS 10.51 2.8 b 11.6 b 0.6 b 0.4 a 0.2 b 62.4 a 82.2 a
Prosaro 421SC (6.5 fl oz) at FGS 10.51 3.6 ab 15.6 ab 0.9 ab 1.0 a 0.2 ab 62.0 a 80.5 a
Prosaro 421SC (6.5 fl oz) at FGS 10.53 2.3 b 10.6 b 0.4 b 0.5 a 0.2 b 62.5 a 86.1 a
HSD (P=0.05) 3.30 12.11 1.10 NS 0.20 NS NS
CV (%) 104.83 91.38 140.67 147.46 98.09 1.73 11.54 * Column numbers followed by different letters are significantly different at P=0.05 as determined by Tukey-Kramer HSD.
Plant Disease Management Reports 13:CF064 Page 2
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 18
BARLEY (Hordeum vulgare, ‘LCS Calypso, ‘AC Flavia’, ‘KWS Scala, ‘KWS Somerset’) Fusarium head blight (scab); Fusarium graminearum Spot blotch; Bipolaris sorokiniana Scald; Rhynchosporium secalis
J.K. Starr, K.L. Myers, A. Lugo-Torres, L.A. Kane, J.A. Cummings and G.C. Bergstrom, Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, and P.J. Stachowski, Cornell Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Evaluation of integrated methods for management of Fusarium head blight and foliar diseases of winter malting barley in New York, 2018.
The trial was conducted at Musgrave Research Farm in Aurora, NY in a Lima silt loam soil planted in a field that was fallow in 2016 and was cropped to corn in 2015. The field was planted on 29 Sep 2017 with four 2-row winter malting barley cultivars, ‘LCS Calypso’, ‘AC Flavia’, ‘KWS Scala’, and ‘KWS Somerset’. The experiment was set up as a completely randomized block design with a split-plot arrangement, with cultivar as the main plot and the treatments as subplots, randomized in three replicated blocks. Main plots were sown with barley at 96 lb/A with a 10-ft wide commercial no till grain drill. Subplots were 20 × 10 ft. The plots were fertilized at planting (200 lb/A of 10-20-20) and topdressed on 23 Apr (60 lb/A of urea, providing an additional 27.6 lb/A of nitrogen). Treatments of Prosaro or Caramba were applied on 29 May at full-head emergence or Feekes growth stage (FGS) 10.5. A treatment of Caramba was applied on 1 Jun at FGS 10.51. Each of the fungicidal treatments included the non-ionic surfactant Induce at a rate of 0.125% vv. A spray inoculation of a conidial suspension of Fusarium graminearum (40,000 spores/ml) was conducted after the fungicide had dried to enhance the development of Fusarium head blight (FHB). Fungicide treatments and F. graminearum inoculum were applied by a tractor-mounted CO2 sprayer with TeeJet-AI3070 nozzles, 20-in. apart, pressurized at 40 psi, and calibrated to deliver 20 gal/A at 3 MPH. Incidence and severity (percent of symptomatic spikelets on symptomatic heads) of FHB in each plot were rated on 14 Jun and used to calculate FHB Index, where FHB index = (FHB severity * FHB incidence)/100. Spot blotch, caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana, and scald, caused by Rhynchosporium secalis, were rated on 14 Jun as percent disease severity on flag leaves and one leaf below the flag leaf (average rating for whole plot). Grain was harvested from a 20 × 5 ft area in each subplot using a SP20 Almaco plot combine on 16 Jul. Grain moisture, plot yield, and test weight were recorded. Yield and test weight were adjusted to bu/A and lb/bu, respectively, at 14.5% moisture. Analysis of deoxynivalenol (DON) concentration (ppm) in grain was conducted in the Mycotoxin Analysis Laboratory at the University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN with support from the U.S. Wheat and Barley Research Initiative. Treatment means were calculated, subjected to analysis of variance, and separated by Tukey-Kramer HSD test (P = 0.05). Warm, dry conditions prevailed through flowering and grain filling stages, thus were conducive to low foliar disease and low levels of DON. Powdery mildew and leaf rust were not observed. When the cultivars were analyzed separately, the only significant disease variable to report was an increased level of scald in ‘AC Flavia’. Application of Prosaro at head emergence reduced scald in ‘AC Flavia’ compared to other treatments. When the results of the treatments were combined, ‘KWS Somerset’ and ’LCS Calypso’ were more resistant to spot blotch and scald, whereas ‘AC Flavia’ and ‘KWS Scala’ showed an increased susceptibility to these foliar diseases. ‘AC Flavia’ had the highest test weight compared with ‘KWS Scala’ and ‘KWS Somerset’. However, ‘KWS Somerset’ had the highest yield compared to all other cultivars when treatments were combined. It was observed that ‘LCS Calypso’ was negatively impacted by heavy bird feeding damage throughout the growing season. DON levels in all treatments of all varieties were well below the acceptable 1 ppm threshold. A small decrease in DON was noted in response to both Caramba applications when observing treatments averaged across cultivars. In a year and location with low disease and mycotoxin pressure, choice of variety resulted in significant effect on yield and scald severity, whereas fungicide treatment did not.
Plant Disease Management Reports 13:CF063 Page 1
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 19
Cultivar, treatment, and amount/A
Spot Blotch
(%)
Scald (%)
FHB Incidence
(%)
FHB Severity
(%)
FHB Index
DON (ppm)
Test weight
(lb/bu)
Yield (bu/A)
LCS Calypso
Non-treated 0.1 a 0.1 a 0.7 a 0.3 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 45.3 a 76.9 a
Prosaro 421SC (8.2 fl oz) at FGS 10.5 0.7 a 0.1 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 46.6 a 84.8 a
Caramba 0.75EC (17.0 fl oz) at FGS 10.5 1.1 a 0.1 a 0.7 a 0.3 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 45.5 a 89.0 a
Caramba 0.75EC (17.0 fl oz) FGS 10.51 0.1 a 1.1 a 1.3 a 0.7 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 48.1 a 79.7 a
HSD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
CV (%) 245.02 191.64 195.4 195.4 233.55 90.72 4.45 17.60
AC Flavia
Non-treated 4.3 a 55.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 48.3 a 83.3 a
Prosaro 421SC (8.2 fl oz) at FGS 10.5 2.0 a 18.7 b 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 50.8 a 82.1 a
Caramba 0.75EC (17.0 fl oz) at FGS 10.5 3.3 a 31.7 a 2.0 a 0.7 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 48.2 a 77.3 a
Caramba 0.75EC (17.0 fl oz) FGS 10.51 3.0 a 46.7 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 48.2 a 81.8 a
HSD (P=0.05) NS 27.05 NS NS NS NS NS NS
CV (%) 40.02 48.48 248.63 233.55 248.63 135.39 4.20 14.03
KWS Scala
Non-treated 4.0 a 51.7 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 46.8 a 66.2 a
Prosaro 421SC (8.2 fl oz) at FGS 10.5 3.0 a 27.5 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 42.9 a 76.1 a
Caramba 0.75EC (17.0 fl oz) at FGS 10.5 3.0 a 25.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 42.8 a 74.1 a
Caramba 0.75EC (17.0 fl oz) FGS 10.51 3.3 a 53.3 a 0.7 a 0.3 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 42.8 a 74.7 a
HSD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
CV (%) 51.96 50.19 331.66 331.66 331.66 331.66 8.01 13.03
KWS Somerset
Non-treated 0.1 a 2.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 45.5 a 101.6 a
Prosaro 421SC (8.2 fl oz) at FGS 10.5 0.4 a 0.4 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.2 a 44.2 a 99.7 a
Caramba 0.75EC (17.0 fl oz) at FGS 10.5 1.0 a 2.4 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.2 a 45.5 a 89.6 a
Caramba 0.75EC (17.0 fl oz) FGS 10.51 0.1 a 1.7 a 0.7 a 0.3 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 45.9 a 96.6
HSD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
CV (%) 149.32 94.50 233.55 233.55 233.55 107.75 4.71 7.49
Cultivar mean
LCS Calypso 0.5 b 0.3 b 0.7 a 0.3 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 46.4 ab 82.6 b
AC Flavia 3.2 a 43.0 a 0.5 a 0.2 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 48.9 a 81.1 b
KWS Scala 3.4 a 40.5 a 0.2 a 0.1 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 43.9 b 72.5 b
KWS Somerset 0.4 b 1.6 b 0.3 a 0.2 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 45.3 b 96.9 a
HSD (P=0.05) 1.37 15.73 NS NS NS NS 2.72 12.02
CV (%) 100.50 118.91 238.77 234.52 276.57 96.79 6.55 16.55
Treatment mean
Non-treated 2.1 a 27.2 a 0.2 q 0.1 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 46.5 a 82.0 a
Prosaro 421SC (8.2 fl oz) at FGS 10.5 1.4 a 10.2 a 0.2 a 0.1 a 0.0 a 0.1 a 46.4 a 86.6 a
Caramba 0.75EC (17.0 fl oz) at FGS 10.5 2.1 a 19.8 a 0.7 a 0.3 a 0.0 a 0.0 b 45.5 a 82.5 a
Caramba 0.75EC (17.0 fl oz) FGS 10.51 1.6 a 25.7 a 0.7 a 0.3 a 0.0 a 0.0 b 46.3 a 83.2 a
HSD (P=0.05) NS NS NS NS NS 0.05 NS NS
CV (%) 100.50 118.91 238.77 234.52 276.57 96.79 6.55 16.55 * Column numbers followed by different letters are significantly different at P=0.05 as determined by Tukey-Kramer HSD.
Plant Disease Management Reports 13:CF063 Page 2
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 20
BARLEY (Hordeum vulgare) Fusarium head blight; Fusarium graminearumLeaf rust; Puccinia hordeiSpot blotch; Bipolaris sorokinianaScald; Rhynchosporium secalis
A. Lugo-Torres and G.C. Bergstrom, Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, D. Benscher and M.E. Sorrells, Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Evaluation of Fusarium head blight and foliar diseases on winter malting barley varieties in New York,2018.
Winter malting barley trials were conducted in the Snyder and Ketola experimental fields of Cornell University in Tompkins County, and in commercial fields at Poormon Farm in Seneca County and Freier Farm in Ontario County. Each trial was a randomized complete block design with three replicates of 28 varieties. These were primarily malting barley varieties, but also included the feed variety ‘Saturn’ and the naked (hulless) varieties ‘1- 4’, ‘1-6’, ‘10.1150’, ‘10.1618’, ‘#STRKR’, and ‘Buck’. Plots were 13 ft long and 6 rows wide with 7-in. row spacing. Seed was sown at a rate of 120 lb/A on 28 Sep 2017 at Freier, 3 Oct 2017 at Ketola and Poormon, and 10 Oct 2017 at Snyder. Fields were fertilized with 200 lb/A pre-plant application of 10:20:20 (delivering 30 lb/A of nitrogen), and in the spring were top-dressed with 150 lb/A of 34:0:0 at three different rates for each replicate delivering 27,54 and 81 lb/ac of nitrogen, respectively. No fungicides or insecticides were applied, and noartificial inoculations were performed. Foliar disease severities were estimated across the plot as percentage of the top two leaves affected at soft dough stage, Feekes growth stage (FGS) 11.2. Fusarium head blight (FHB) incidence was estimated by counting the number of symptomatic heads out of 50 randomly selected heads. Foliar diseases and FHB incidence were evaluated on 8 Jun at Snyder and Ketola fields, and on 11 Jun at Poormon and Freier farms. Disease incidence and severity means were analyzed with ANOVA and separated by Tukey’s HSDtest (P=0.05).
Due to dry conditions from head emergence through grain formation, only low levels of FHB, spot blotch and leaf rust were observed. The lowest incidence of FHB was consistently observed in the lines ‘SU- Mateo’,‘Endeavor’, and ‘Sommerset’, and the greatest incidence was observed in ‘DH130935’. Varieties ’06-OR-9’ and ‘Alba’ rated the highest for powdery mildew consistently in Snyder, Ketola and Freier fields. Most varieties appeared resistant in each location. Scald was severe only in Ketola, where ‘Charles’ had a greater severity rating than any other variety. ‘Flavia’ and ‘Endeavor’ exhibited more scald severity than the other malting varieties. Inthis year that was only moderately conducive for foliar disease, powdery mildew and scald were controlled sufficiently by choice of resistant variety.
Plant Disease Management Reports 13:CF062 Page 1
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 21
10.1150
10.1618
#STRKR
Buck
Saturn
P value
6
6
6
6
6
3.83 ab
3.83 ab
1.5 ab
0.67ab
1.67 ab
0.0486
0 b
0.17 b
0.67 b
0.17 b
0.33b
<0.0001
0.17b
2.33b
0.33b
0.50b
21.67a
<0.0001
3.50a
2.33a
0.17a
2.00a
3.50a
0.1958
38.33bcd
0.17e
6.67de
3.50e
0e
<0.0001
3.50b
0b
18.50ab
0b
0b
0.0047
3.00b
3.67b
11.67b
6.67b
0.50b
<0.0001
5.33bc
2.17c
5.33bc
9.00abc
10.17abc
0.0003
*Column numbers followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P=0.05 as determined byTukey’s HSD.
ows
6
6
6
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Snyder Ketola Snyder Ketola* Snyder Ketola Snyder Ketola0.16 b 0 b 0.33b 2.00a 73.33a 13.67ab 0.33b 0.17c
1.17 ab 0.17 b 0.33b 0a 8.67cde 0.33b 10.00b 13.33abc
2.83ab 0.17 b 2.33b 0.50a 0.33e 0b 5.00b 3.67bc
1.33 ab 0.17b 0.67b 1.67a 0.33e 0b 13.33b 13.33abc
1.83 ab 0.17 b 0.17b 0a 0.17e 0b 25.00b 33.33a
0.33 b 0 b 0.33b 2.17a 75.00a 46.67a 0b 0.17c
1.83ab 0.17 b 0.83b 2.17a 0e 13.33ab 0.67b 1.83c
1.17 ab 3.17 a 0b 2.67a 0.33e 0b 85.00a 28.67ab
1.33 ab 0 b 0.83b 0.17a 0.17e 0.33b 2.33b 0.67c
5.83a 1 b 7.33b 2.00a 0.33e 0b 0.67b 2.00c
1.17 ab 0b 0.50b 2.00a 38.33bcd 23.33ab 2.17b 0.83c
2.17 ab 0.33b 0.67b 6.67a 48.33ab 0.50b 0.33b 5.00bc
0.67 ab 0 b 0b 0.50a 7.33de 0.50b 21.67b 10.17abc
0.5 b 0.17 b 0b 1.67a 2.33e 0.17b 3.67b 5.67bc
2 0.33 b 0.17b 1.00b 0.67a 2.17e 0b 0.67b 8.67abc
2 0.83 ab 0.17 b 2.00b 2.00a 1.00e 0.17b 2.33b 3.67bc
2 2 ab 0.33 b 2.00b 0.50a 41.67abc 3.67b 3.67b 1.83c
2 0.17 b 0.17b 1.00b 0.17a 0e 0b 1.00b 8.33abc
2 1.83 ab 1.67ab 2.00b 6.67a 0.33e 0b 0.83b 2.00c
2 1.33 ab 0 b 2.00b 3.33a 0.33e 0b 25.00b 15.33abc
2 1 ab 0.33b 3.67b 6.67a 0.50e 0b 0.50b 0.50c
2 1.5 ab 1.33 ab 5.33b 0a 0.17e 0b 11.67b 4.00bc
2 1.5 ab 0.33 b 1.0b 0.33a 2.00e 0b 16.17b 5.17bc
FHB Incidence Spot Blotch Powdery Mildew Scald(%) (%) (%) (%)
Entry R
06-OR-9
10/069/1
10467r2
Wintermalt
Flavia Alba
Calypso
Charles
DH130910
DH130935
DH131055
DH131738
Endeavor
KWS ScalaKWS
SomersetKWS2-430
Nectaria
SU-Mateo
SY Tepee
Vincenta
Violetta
1—4
1—6
Plant Disease Management Reports 13:CF062 Page 2
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 22
10.1150
10.1618
#STRKR
Buck
Saturn
P value
6
6
6
6
6
0a
0a
0.17a
0a
0a
0.3292
0.17a
0.17a
0a
0.17a
0a
0.4349
0.00a
1.67a
0.33a
0a
3.50a
0.0114
31.67abcd
13.33bcd
0.67e
0.17e
2.00de
<0.0001
1.0bc
0.50c
2.17bc
2.00bc
0.50c
<0.0001
0.83bc
0.17bc
0.67bc
5.33abc
0.50bc
0.0001
*Column numbers followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P=0.05 as determined byTukey’s HSD.
FHB Incidence (%) Spot Blotch(%)
PowderyMildew (%)
Scald (%)
Entry Rows Seneca Ontario Ontario Ontario Seneca Ontario County* County* County* County County County
06-OR-9 6 0.33a 1.17a 0.17a 51.67a 0.67c 0.50bc
10/069/1 6 0a 0.33a 0a 0.50e 6abc 10.83a
10467r2 6 0.17a 0a 0a 10.33bcde 0.67c 2.00bc
Wintermalt 6 0a 0a 0a 0.33e 4.50bc 8.33ab
Flavia 2 0a 0.17a 0.17a 3.33de 11.17a 3.67abc
Alba 2 0a 0a 1.67a 36.67ab 0.50c 0c
Calypso 2 0.17a 0.33a 0.33a 2.00de 0.83c 0.33bc
Charles 2 0a 0.33a 00a 0e 7.00ab 6.67abc
DH130910 2 0a 0.33a 0.33a 6.83bcde 0.67c 1.00bc
DH130935 2 0a 0.33a 3.33a 5.83cde 2.00bc 0.67bc
DH131055 2 0a 0.17a 0a 35.00cde 0.83c 0.67bc
DH131738 2 0.17a 0.33a 0a 25.00abcde 0.50c 0.67bc
Endeavor 2 0a 0.17a 0a 3.33de 3.67bc 0.83bc
KWS Scala 2 0a 0a 0.17a 3.33de 5.00bc KWS
3.83abc
Somerset 2 0a 0a 0.50a 1.67e 0.67c 0.50bc
KWS2-430 2 0a 0.50a 0.67a 2.33de 0.83c 0.33bc
Nectaria 2 0a 0.17a 0.33a 5.33cde 1.00bc 2.00bc SU-Mateo 2 0a 0.17a 0.67a 0.33e 0.50c 0.50bc SY Tepee 2 0a 0.17a 0.67a 0.33e 0.67c 0.83bc
Vincenta 2 0a 0.17a 0.50a 1.83de 4.17bc 1.17bc
Violetta 2 0.17a 1.17a 0.33a 1.00e 0.50c 0.50bc
1—4 2 0.17a 0.33a 0a 3.33de 1.00bc 2.17bc
1—6 2 0a 0a 0.17a 5.00de 2.17bc 2.17bc
Plant Disease Management Reports 13:CF062 Page 3
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 23
Choose variety based on market demand and regional performance dataChoose varieties based on Cornell University’s variety-screening program to select modern varieties that have the potential to perform well in NY. Cornell evaluates malting barley varieties for yield, grain quality, lodging, and disease resistance potential.
Use certified seed to insure variety purity so that you deliver to the malthouse the variety for which you contracted. Using certified seed reduces the risk of introducing weeds, and also reduces the risk of seed borne diseases that can affect yield and quality.
Do not mix varieties within a field or in the bin. Malthouses are looking for lots of malting barley of the same variety so they can malt uniformly and sell a consistent product.
Have a marketing plan before you plantContact a malthouse before planting to determine their need for the crop and preferred varieties. A contract with a malthouse is recommended. The contract should be specific to the variety(s), acres contracted, price/bu, and the grain quality parameters required to fulfill the contract. Contracts allow:
1. malthouses to secure the quality and quantity of barley they need, and2. growers’ security to have a home for the malting barley they grow, provided it meets
quality standards.
Grow winter barley vs. spring barley based on risk/benefit for your farmChoices between winter and spring malting barley should be based on understanding the risk, yield, grain quality, and recommendations of the malthouse to which you are selling.
Average winter barley yields are typically 60-80 bushels per acre– but they are also the least winter-hardy small grain that can be grown in New York so management guidelines for planting date and depth and soil drainage must be followed or frost heaving and plant death will occur. Since snow cover is key to protecting winter barley from extreme temperatures and drying winds, some degree of winter damage may occur in fields lacking snow cover, even if best practices were followed. Avoid varieties that are not winter hardy.
Average spring barley yields are typically 40-60 bushels per acre. Management guidelines for planting date and soil drainage must be followed or spring barley yield potential will be low from late planting. Head emergence and grain filling during warmer weather for spring barley is often more conducive for fungal diseases.
Winter barley
Spring barley
MALTING BARLEYKEYS TO SUCCESSFUL PRODUCTION IN NEW YORK STATE
Cornell Cooperative Extension
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 24
Plant in well-drained fields with pH of 6.3 or higherPlant malting barley on well-drained fields with a pH of 6.3 or greater. Compared to other small grains, malting barley is markedly less tolerant of wet soils and low pH. Malting barley should ideally be planted in soils that:
1. have good soil health and a well-drained texture (good infiltration and percolation potential),
2. are not subject to a persistently high-water table that inhibits drainage (despite well-drained soil textures), and
3. have a low chance for ponding (topography that allows for surface drainage). Winter barley can more commonly suffer from wet soils because of exposure to spring thaw conditions.
Malting barley should not be planted without first soil testing potential fields for pH and other plant nutrients.
Target planting in mid-September and early April for optimal standsPlanting date, rate, and seed depth are important to achieve your desired plant population. Winter barley should be ideally planted the second or third week of September. Spring barley should be planted in early April to strongly reduce summer weed pressure and maintain yield potential which drops by ~0.5-1 bushel per day after April 15th.
Plant malting barley at a rate of two bushels (96 lbs) per acre. Higher seeding rates may increase lodging, disease potential, and lead to smaller and more variable kernels.
Plant seed 1-1.5 inches deep with a grain drill. Shallow planting hinders proper root development; this is particularly crucial for winter barley. Do not broadcast seed of a malting barley crop as seed depth will be inconsistent and may result in stands that are too thick, thin, or variable.
Optimize fertilization to achieve yield and grain protein targetsNitrogen fertility management is important for malting barley to yield well and meet malting quality standards. The protein content in malting barley should generally be >9% and <12.5%. Protein levels are dependent on available N. Targeting N fertility can be difficult though because of potential losses due to denitrification and leaching with high precipitation and variable soil drainage. Also, malting barley N fertility rates have not been thoroughly evaluated in the Northeast to date. Growers need to consider N contributions from previous crops, manure, and nitrogen fertilizer to preserve grain quality and avoid lodging. Given what is known for spring barley, apply 30-60 pounds per acre of N at planting. For winter barley apply 20-30 pounds
per acre of N at planting in the fall and target 80-120 pounds of N per acre at green-up in early spring or split applied between green-up and stem elongation. Growers will need to adjust nitrogen rates for
their situation to achieve the desired crude protein. Over-fertilizing with N can also make barley more prone to lodging. Because barley already has relatively soft straw, and our climate commonly has
midsummer rain, dew, and wind that puts extra weight on grain heads, targeted N fertility is a key component of managing barley lodging. All other nutrients should be applied according
to soil tests.
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day HandoutsPage 25
MALTING BARLEY KEYS TO SUCCESSFUL PRODUCTION IN NEW YORK STATE
Reduce disease and mycotoxin risk through integrated managementUse integrated strategies to control Fusarium head blight, other diseases, and
their effects on grain. There are no varieties with high Fusarium head blight resistance, though some possess moderate resistance. Management of Fusarium
head blight requires an integrated strategy that includes less susceptible varieties, cultural practices, and fungicidal protection. Malting barley markets are very stringent
about the DON (deoxynivalenol, aka, “vomitoxin”) mycotoxin levels found in grains infected with Fusarium. Grain lots that test >1 ppm for DON concentrations are likely to be rejected
for malting. The Fusarium head blight pathogen spreads mostly via spores in the air and is common because many grasses and corn are hosts. Barley should not be grown continuously, nor
after corn or wheat, but in rotation with non-grass crops; planting barley into corn residues should especially be avoided. Fusarium infection occurs when there is persistent moisture on the heads from
head emergence through the early grain formation stages. Fungicides to suppress Fusarium head blight should be applied when nearly all seed heads on the primary stems in a field have emerged from the boot. If weather conditions prevent fungicide application at this optimal timing, research has shown that fungicide application up to 7 days after full head emergence will still result in significant disease and toxin suppression, whereas fungicide application prior to head emergence has little benefit. For Fusarium suppression, only use labeled, recommended triazole fungicides (Caramba, Prosaro) at the full-labeled rate. Foliar fungal diseases, such as spot blotch, scald, powdery mildew, and leaf rust, may require management by planting varieties with resistance to specific diseases and/or by spraying labeled fungicides at appropriate timing for disease control. Fungicide products that include a strobilurin ingredient should not be applied after the flag leaf is visible to avoid an increased risk of DON mycotoxin accumulation in grain.
Utilize the best tools to manage weeds in your fieldsGood weed control is essential to achieving high yields and allowing for the crop to be more easily combined and stored. Good pre-emergence weed control, timely spring seeding, strong crop competition (full, healthy, well-nourished stands), and weed seed bank control with herbicides and/or cultivation and crop rotations are important to managing weeds in northeastern grains. Herbicides such as 2,4-D and dicamba (Banvel, Clarity), bromoxynil (Buctril), and thifensulfuron + tribenuron (Harmony Extra) may provide annual broadleaf control. Pinoxiden (Axial XL) is labeled for annual grass control (ie. foxtail species) in spring barley. Pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil (Huskie) is also labeled for marestail control in winter barley. Read the label before use for specific rates, application timing, and weeds controlled. If using growth regulators such as 2,4-D and dicamba products, apply before stem elongation.
Weeds can also be controlled by cultivation with a tine weeder; typically, at least two passes are used, with one just before seedling emergence and another at the 3 to 5-leaf stage.
2019 Small Grains Management Field Day Handouts Page 26
Timely harvest is essential to produce malt-quality grainMaturing malting barley should be harvested as close to maturity as possible to reduce pre-harvest sprouting. Pre-harvest sprouting or “pre-germination” occurs when the grain has begun to mature and dry in the field but rain and/or dew is sufficient for the kernel to begin germinating. Do not allow barley to dry and then gain moisture before harvest if possible. Monitor diligently for physical signs of maturity (green color disappearance from glumes and peduncle, nodding grain heads) and target harvesting malting barley between 16-20% moisture if you have sufficient grain drying capacity. Allowing malting barley to field dry to the 12-13% kernel moisture level needed for long-term storage will lead to pre-harvest sprouting if excess moisture is present. A germination rate of ≥95% is desired for malting. Pre-harvest sprouting damage also limits the length of time the seed may be viable even if germination is 95% or better at harvest. Growers can also use varieties with resistance to pre-harvest sprouting in addition to timely harvest.
Precision drying, cleaning, and storage will sustain grain quality to end marketsGrain drying equipment, cleaning and storage are key tools for northeastern malting barley production. Malting barley production is often compared to certified seed production; barley kernels need to be high quality, uniform, clean, and most importantly - alive. Additional cleaning is usually needed to remove weed seeds and green matter that impart moisture and (sometimes) off- flavors. Access to at least a rotary cleaner is a must, but more cleaning equipment may be needed. Grain cleaning can also cull out diseased kernels that are often lighter than healthy ones. Lodged barley may also need to be cleaned to remove stones after harvest. Harvesting at higher moisture levels requires growers to have a robust grain-drying system that can move sufficient air and/or provide low-grade heat (≤100°F, no greater) if needed. Adequate cleaning, drying and storage should be lined up well before harvest.
For more information, consult Cornell University’s malting barley website:
fieldcrops.cals.cornell.edu/small-grains/malting-barley
This publication was produced with support from the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, the Genesee Valley Regional Market Authority,
the New York Farm Viability Institute, Cornell Cooperative Extension, and Cornell University School of Integrative Plant Science.
MALTING BARLEY KEYS TO SUCCESSFUL PRODUCTION IN NEW YORK STATEMay 2018
Cornell Cooperative Extension