small animal radionuclide imaging: instrumentation ... · department of radiology small animal...
TRANSCRIPT
1
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Small Animal Radionuclide Imaging:Instrumentation, Performance, and Applications
Craig S. Levin, Ph.D.Stanford University School of Medicine
Department of Radiology
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Small Animal Radionuclide Imaging
•Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography (PET)Instrumentation requirements and challengesCommercially available systemsNew approaches
•Summary
Outline of talk:
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Nuclear decays of interest for imaginggenerate high energy photons
e+Gamma Ray
Annihilation Photons
Gamma decay: Nuclear de-excitation Positron decay: Nuclear transmutation
Example: 99mTc --> 99Tc + γ
Short-livedexcitednucleus
γ−ray+Stablestate ofnucleus
Example: 18F --> 18O + e+ + ν
+ e+
positron
ν+Short-livedunstablenucleus
Morestableisotope
2
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Small Animal PET System Design Wish List
•Reconstructed spatial resolution ≤ 1 mm•Uniformity of spatial resolution•Sensitivity (coincidence detection efficiency) > 10%•Energy resolution ≤ 12% FWHM at 511 keV•Coincidence time resolution ≤ 2 ns FWHM•Live time > 95%•Robust image reconstruction algorithm•Accurate data correction and calibration•Reasonable cost
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Positron Emitter Variations inpositron trajectory-Effects on resolution
depend on isotope
Variations in annihilationphoton non-collinearity-
Effects on resolutiondepend on system diameter
Variations in photoninteraction location-
Effects on resolution dependon detector element size
Detector Gantry
e+
Limitations on PET Spatial Resolution
MolecularProbe
DetectorElement
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
SPAT
IAL
RESO
LUTI
ON
(mm
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 cm10 cm20 cm80 cm
0 cm10 cm20 cm80 cm
DETECTOR ELEMENT WIDTH (mm)
SystemDiameter
FWHM FWTM
{BlurringFunctions
PositronRange
PhotonNon-collinearity
DetectorWidth
18F
Spatial Resolution Limit for 18F PET
~500µm spatial resolution (fwhm) is possible in theory
3
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Non-Uniform Resolution Due toPhoton Penetration in Crystals
= (Δd/2) r / [R+(Δd/2)]
= r / [(D/Δd)+1]
Upper Limit on Radial Resolution Blurring(see drawing for definition of symbols):
(an “upper” limit since Δx is calculatedassuming two isolated crystals as shown;the presence of other adjacent absorbingdetector crystals weights the calculationtowards shallower average interaction depth)
θi
RΔxupper
Δd
θi
r
crystalfinger
detectorgantry
Δrupper ≈ Δxupper/2 = (Δd/2)·sinθi (FWHM)
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Δrupper ≈ r / [(D/Δd)+1]
For a mouse positioned atcenter with diameter of 3 cm,at radial position r=1.5 mm,and system depth resolutionΔd=10 mm, theradial blurring contributionΔr<1.5 mm FWHM
Δd
Non-Uniform Resolution Due toPhoton Penetration in Crystals
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Challenges for High Resolution PET Detectors
Requirements for Crystal Arrays:
•Narrow (≤1 mm) for high spatial resolution•Long (20-30 mm) and tightly packed
for high coincidence detection efficiency•Need robust light signal for best coincident time resolution,
energy resolution, detection efficiency,and crystal identification; These parameters determinecontrast resolution and quantitative accuracy.
511 keV photonI. Getting light out of long,skinny crystals
4
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
High Geometric Efficiency(Ω/4π):
Photon detectors should be asclose to the body, cover aslarge an axial FOV and be astightly-packed as possible:
Ω ≈ 4π (A/D)×P
A=axial field-of-viewD=diameterP=crystal packing fraction
High Intrinsic DetectionEfficiency (ε):
511 keV photon detectorsshould have high Z, highdensity, and be thick for highstopping power:
ε = (1-e -µx)×f
µ=attenuation coefficientx=crystal thickness/lengthf=fraction of events withinenergy window
Coincidence Detection:
ε2 = [(1-e -µx)×f]2
Sensitivity (%) ≈ 100×(Ω/4π)×ε2 = 100×(A/D)×P×[(1-e-µx)×f ]2
Photon Count Sensitivity(Coincidence Efficiency) for PET
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Types of Coincidence Events
Scatter and randoms are reduced with better energy and time resolutions
Frontview
Sideview
Random
True
Scatter
Absorbedsinglephoton
Escapedsinglephoton
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Scintillator EffectiveZ
Density(g/cc)
1/eattenuation
length at511 keV
(cm)
Relativelightyield
(%NaI)
Refractiveindex
Decaytime(ns)
Peakemission
wavelength(nm)
Rugged?
“BGO” Bi4(GeO4)3 75 7.13 1.06 15 2.15 300 480 Yes“LSO”
Lu2(SiO4)O:Ce 66 7.4 1.13 75 1.82 42 420 Yes
“GSO”Gd2(SiO4)O:Ce 59 6.71 1.4 20 1.85 60 440 Yes
“LYSO”Lu1.8Y0.2(SiO4)O:Ce 65 7.1 1.2 107 1.81 40 420 Yes
“Sodium Iodide”NaI(Tl) 51 3.67 2.94 100 1.85 230 410 No
Inorganic scintillation crystals for PET
5
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Commercially Available Small Animal PETInstrumentation
•Concorde Microsystems, Knoxville TN “microPET” [Scintillation detectors (LSO), fiber-coupled]•Oxford Positron Systems, Oxfordshire, UK “HIDAC” [MWPC Detectors (lead converters, gas)]•Philips Medical Systems, Philadelphia, PA “Mosaic” [Scintillation detectors (GSO)]•GE-Suinsa Medical Systems, Madrid, Spain “eXplore Vista” [Dual-layer scintillation detectors (LSO-GSO)]•Gamma Medica, Northridge, CA “X-PET” [Scintillation detectors (BGO) + SPECT/CT]•Advanced Molecular Imaging, Quebec Canada “LabPET” [Scintillation detectors-Avalanche Photodiodes]
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Concorde Microsystems microPET Focus
Focus 120 Focus 220
Bore size 120 mm 220 mmAxial FOV 780 mm 780 mmResolution 1.3 mm 1.3 mmCoincidence Efficiency >6.5% >4.0%Energy Resolution 18% 18%Peak NEC >580kcps >700kcps
R4 & P4
Courtesy of Stefan Siegel, Concorde Microsystems
1.5x1.5x10 mm3 LSO 2.2x2.2x10 mm3 LSO
511 keV flood responseof detector block Energy spectrum in LSO
Focus
Detector cassette
Fiberoptics
PSPMT
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
microPET Focus Performance
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Image Resolution
Focus TangentialFocus RadialFocus Axial
R4 TangentialR4 RadialR4 Axial
mm
Radial Offset (mm)
•250-750 keV energy window
•10 ns timing window
•Fourier rebinning, 2D FBP
FWH
M (
mm
)
Reconstructed point source resolution
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 5 10 15
Activity (mCi)
NE
C (
kcps
)
250-750 keV 10 ns250-750 keV 6 ns350-650 keV 10 ns350-650 keV 6 ns
Count rate performance(mouse phantom)
T2
T+S+2RNEC =
T= “true” coincident rateS= scatter coincident rateR= random coincident rate
Courtesy of Yuan-Chuan Tai, Washington University
Concorde P4, FBP Concorde Focus, FBP
Fourier rebinning + 2D FBP /Ramp filter.1.2 mm
1.6 mm
2.4 mm 3.2 mm
4.0 mm
4.8 mm
6
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
microPET Focus Images
end-systole end-diastole non-gated
Courtesy of Douglas Rowland, Washington University
362.6 g S.D. Rat0.966 mCi 18FDG1.8 hr P.I. 30 min scan~23 ms frames
Cardiac Gated Images (Rat) Neuro-receptor imaging(mouse)
20 g mouse injected with 11C-CFT
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
GE-Suinsa eXplore Vista (Argus)
· Ring diameter: 11.8 cm· Aperture: 8 cm· Effective transverse field-of-view: 6 cm· Axial FOV: drT: 4.6 cm (srT = 2.0 cm)· Number of depth-of-interaction detector modules: 36 (18) PS- PMTs· Number of dual-scintillator depth-of-interaction elements: 6,084 (3,042)· Depth identification method: pulse shapediscrimination· Crystal array pitch: 1.55 mm· Total number of crystals: 12,168 (6,084)· 3D (coincidences and singles)· Total number of coincidence lines: 28.8 M (7.2M)
Detector module 511 keV field flood
crystal pitch = 1.55 mm
Spatial resolution in central slice:1.45 mm radial1.56 mm tangential1.74 mm axial3.9 mm3 Volume resolutionCoincidence timing resolution:1.5 ns FWHMCentral point source sensitivity:4.0% [250-700 keV]5.7% [100-700 keV]Peak NEC rate with mouse phantom:185,000 cps [250-700keV] @ 15 µCi/cc
Courtesy of Juan José Vaquero, Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Dual-layer LYSO-GSO detectors
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
µDerenzo Phantom3D FORE/2D FBP
1.6 mm
4.8 mm
4.0 mm
3.2 mm2.4 mm
1.2 mm
transverse sagittal coronal
cortex cortex
spinal cord
cortex
Awake Rat (F-18 FDG)
ARGUS 3D OSEM reconstruction with resolution recovery
GE-Suinsa eXplore Vista (Argus)
Courtesy of Juan José Vaquero, Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Imaging performance
7
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Brookhaven National Laboratory, USAClear PET Collaboration, Multi-nationalHamamatsu University, JapanHammersmith Medical Center, UKHarvard University, USAIndiana University, USAKing’s College UKMontreal Neurological Institute, CanadaNational Institutes for Health, USAStanford University, USAUniversitario Gregorio MarañónUniversity of California, Davis, USAUniversity of California, Los Angeles, USAUniversity of Julich, GermanyUniversity of Munich, GermanyUniversity of Pennsylvania, USAUniversity of Pisa, ItalyUniversity of Sherbrooke, CanadaUniversity of Texas, USAUniversity of Southwestern Texas, USAUniversity of Washington, USAWashington University, USA
Research Institutions Developing SmallAnimal PET Instrumentation
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
New Technologies for Small AnimalPET System Design
•Improved Scintillation Detectors•Semiconductor Detectors
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
•Narrow (≤1 mm) for high spatial resolution
•Long (20-30 mm) and tightly packed for
high coincidence detection efficiency
and…don’t forget...
•Need high light extraction with low variation for best time resolution,
energy resolution, detection efficiency, and crystal identification;
these parameters will help to optimize contrast resolution andquantitative accuracy by helping to reject background events.
511 keV photon
Is it possible to build a high performance PETsystem with 1 mm crystal pixels?
Requirements for Crystal Arrays:
8
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
How can we collect >90% of light from tinyarray crystals?
++
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
++
+
+
+
+
++
+
+
Instead ofcollecting thelight from thesmall end
(a small fraction of lightis collected)
Collect thelight fromthe long side
(a high fraction oflight is collected)
Light CollectionEfficiency:
f ∝ (A/L)(1 - 1/n2)
A
L
n = refractive index
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Light Collection Improvements (1x1 mm2 pixels)
0102030405060708090100
0102030405060708090100
LSO BGO GSO
GROUND SURFACEWHITE REFLECTOR
POLISHED SURFACEWHITE REFLECTOR
1x1x10 mm 3
0102030405060708090100
0102030405060708090100
LSO BGO GSO
1x1x20 mm 3
GROUND SURFACEWHITE REFLECTOR
POLISHED SURFACEWHITE REFLECTOR
6 mm long 20 mm long10 mm long
For proposed scheme•Nearly all available scintillation light is collected (≥95%)•Light collection efficiency is independent of crystal length,width and surface treatment•Light collection efficiency is independent of the light origin•Results in superior energy and time resolution
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
How could we collect more light from arrays ofminiscule (1 mm) crystals?
Instead of this...
Can we do this?
Photodetectorat crystal
ends
Thin photodetectors at crystal
sides
PSPMT
9
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Scintillation detector arrays with “edge-on” position sensitive avalanchephotodiode (PSAPD) arrays between crystal planes
511 keVphoton
511 keVphoton•~2 cm thick of LSO
detectors in two stackedblock modules
•Each modulecomprises 8 layers
•Each layer comprises3x8 arrays of 1x1x3mm3 LSO crystals (left)or 1 mm thick sheets(right)
•This gives ~ 1-3 mminteraction depthresolution
•Thin PSAPDs required
2 cmthick
9x9x1 mm3
LSO sheets
1x1x3 mm3
LSO crystals
Need: extremely thin PSAPD
New Approach for PET Detector Design
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
•Made by RMD, Inc.•8x8 mm2 area•Gain ~1000•Leakage Current ~1-2 µA•Capacitance ~0.7 pf/mm2
~45 pf•Noise ~130 e- rms
Two sizes: 8 mm or 13 mm
(A+B)-(C+D)X =A+B+C+D
A
B
C
D
(X,Y)
Problem: Standard PSAPD is not thin enough for high crystal packing fraction in ourproposed detector design
ScintillationLight flash
Cornercontacts
(A+C)-(B+D)Y =A+B+C+D
Selected Scintillation Light SensorPosition sensitive avalanche photodiode (PSAPD)
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Standard chip andceramic package
Thin chip and Kaptonpackage (~230 micron thick)
Flex circuitaccomodates twothin PSAPD chipson a same plane
Standard vs. Thin PSAPD
New Light Detector:Position Sensitive Avalanche Photodiode (PSAPD)
10
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Novel “edge-on” detector configuration usingposition sensitive avalanche photodiodes
One layer of detector modulecomprising PSAPD coupled to a 3x8array of 1X1X3-mm3 LSO crystals.Half ground and half polished crystalswere used to compare spatial, energyand temporal resolution performance.
1.0 mm intra-layercrystal pitch
511 keVphotons
10 mm of LSO 1x1x3mm3
LSO crystals
PSAPD + flexcircuit + reflector
(<300 µm totalthickness)
Flex circuit forsignal readoutand HV bias
1.3mm interlayercrystal pitch
2.2 cm
Novel, ultra-thin (<300 µm) position-sensitive avalanchephotodiodes (PSAPD) are placed between the crystallayers with incident 511-keV photons entering parallel tothe PSAPD plane (“edge-on”) as shown. This designgives direct measurement of photon depth-of-interactionand an effective 2-cm thickness of LSO crystal.
Groundcrystals
Polishedcrystals
Second PSAPD chiplocation (not mounted)
PSAPD chip
Flex circuit
Electricaltraces
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
jin new123x81x1x3fldr30.l
100 200 300 400 500
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500 0
5
10
15
20
25
Flood irradiation of 8x3 array of 1x1x3 mm3 crystalsside coupled to thin PSAPD
100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
50
100
150
200Polished surfacesGround surfaces {{
No intercrystal reflectors
Flood histogramProfile through center
15:1 peak:valley ratio
Excellent crystal identification due to high light collection efficiency
No intercrystal reflectors
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Spatial resolution of LSO-PSAPD detector layers
0 5 10 150
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Position (mm)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1.04 mmFWHM
100 200 300 400 500
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
12 3 4 5 6 7 8
22NaLSO PMT
PSAPD
LSOarray
Scan direction
FWHM of the point spread functionsis measured to be about 1.0 mm.Left figure shows the top view ofexperimental setup used to measurecoincidence time resolution and pointspread function by edge-on scanning.
11
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
0 50
50
100
150
200
250
0 50
100
200
300
0 50
100
200
300
400
0 50
100
200
300
400
0 5 100
100
200
300
400
0 5 100
100
200
300
400
0 50
100
200
300
0 5 100
50
100
150
200
250
0 50
100
200
300
0 50
100
200
300
400
500
0 50
200
400
600
800
0 50
200
400
600
800
0 50
200
400
600
800
0 50
200
400
600
800
0 50
100
200
300
400
500
0 50
100
200
300
0 50
100
200
300
0 50
100
200
300
0 50
100
200
300
400
0 50
100
200
300
400
500
0 50
100
200
300
400
500
0 50
100
200
300
400
0 50
100
200
300
0 50
100
200
300
Ground crystals Polished crystals
Thin PSAPD: energy spectra of individual crystals3x8 array of 1x1x3 mm3 LSO crystals
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Measured energy and time resolutions ofLSO-PSAPD modules
Experimental measurements show that the average energy resolution is 11.0±1%,coincidence time resolution is 2.1±0.1 ns.
Coincidence time spectrum
Coun
ts
40 45 50 55 60 65 700
100
200
300
400
500
600
Time difference (ns)
← FWHM: 2.1 ns
TAC Data
Gaussian FitPSAPD START,
PMT STOP
9.91%FWHM at 511 keV
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Voltage (v)
Co
un
ts
22Na Energy Spectrum
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Energy resolution comparison conventional vs. proposed high res PET
Proposed PET system:LSO-PSAPD
Conventional µPET system:LSO-Fiber-PSPMT
These proposed energy resolution improvements will yieldenhanced sensitivity, image contrast and quantitative accuracy
10.4%fwhm
at 511 keV
26.1%fwhm
at 511 keV
12
MIPS Stanford UniversityMolecular ImagingProgram at Stanford
School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology
Summary Great progress has been made in pre-clinical radionuclide imaginginstrumentation
PET:•There are now six vendors for high resolution PET systems for smallanimal imaging•Over twenty research groups working on high resolution PET systemsworld wide•Sensitivity and spatial resolution, and energy resolution all continue toimprove•Efforts to fuse this information onto high resolution CT and MR are beingmade
In order for small animal imaging to assist existing drug development andtesting protocols, must push for highly accurate image data and means toextract quantitative information that accurately characterize molecularsignals