slovakia / slovaquie / eslovaquia · 2014-12-10 · 3 nám. l. stúra 1 812 35 bratislava slovakia...

SLOVAKIA / SLOVAQUIE / ESLOVAQUIA

1

Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species

of Wild Animals

Format for reports of Parties on implementation of theConvention on the Conservation of Migratory Species

of Wild Animals (revision of January 2002)

Reporting format agreed by the Standing Committee at its 23rd meeting (Bonn, December 2001) for voluntary use byParties, on a trial basis, for reports submitted to COP7. Refer to separate instructions on completing the report.

The questions below combine elements of Resolution 4.1 (Party Reports) adopted by the Fourth Meeting of theConference of the Parties (Nairobi, June 1994) and Resolution 6.4 (Strategic Plan for the Convention on MigratorySpecies 2000-2005), adopted by the Sixth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (Cape Town, November 1999), as wellas commitments arising from other operational Resolutions and Recommendations of the Conference of the Parties.

Which agency has been primarily responsible for the preparation of this report?

Ministry of the Environment

List any other agencies that have provided input:State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic

I(a). General Information

Please complete any unfilled boxes and amend and/or update as appropriate the information provid ed in the table below:

Reports submitted: 2002

Period covered by this report: 1998 - 2001

Date of entry into force of the Convention in Slovakia: 1 March 1995

Territory to which the Convention applies: Slovak Republic

Reservations (against species listings): None

Designated Focal Point:

Mr. Peter PilinskýMinistry of the EnvironmentDept. of Nature and Landscape ProtectionNám. L. Stúra 1812 35 BratislavaSlovakia

Tel.: (+421 7) 59 56 21 89Fax: (+421 7) 59 56 25 33E-mail: [email protected]

Appointment to the Scientific Council:

Dr. Marcel UhrínDirector GeneralNational Park Muránska Planina Administrationstr. Janka Král'a 1205001 RevúcaSlovakia

Tel.: (+421 58) 442 2061Fax: (+421 58) 441 6119E-mail: [email protected]

Alternate member:

Ing. Ján TopercerComenius UniversityBotanic GardenDetached Unit03815 Blatnica 315Slovakia

Tel.: (+421 43) 494 82 13Fax: (+421 43) 494 82 13E-mail: [email protected]

2

Membership of the Standing Committee: Not applicable

Competent authority: Ministry of the Environment (nature conservation)

Ministry of Agriculture (hunting & huntable species)

Implementing legislation: Act of the Ministry of Agriculture 172/1975 onhunting

Law 17/1992 on Environment

Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic No.287/1994 on Nature and Landscape Protection

Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic No.115/1995 on the Protection of Animals

Other relevant conventions/agreements (apart from CMS) towhich Slovakia is a Party:

Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especiallyas Waterfowl Habitats wetlands (Ramsar Convention);

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD);

Convention on the Conservatio of European Wildlife andNatural Habitats (Bern Convention).

National policy instruments (e.g. national biodiversityconservation strategy, etc.):

National biodiversity conservation strategy (NBCS);

Action plan for implemantation of NBCS ( 1998 – 2010);

National Environmental Action plan II;

National strategy for sustainable development;

Great Bustard MoU: Party Signed but not yet entered force Non-party

National Contact Point

Regional Unit of State Nature Conservancy of the SlovakRepublic

Name: Jozef ChavkoAddress:str. Hanulova5/DP.O.Box 155844 40 BratislavaSlovakia

Tel.: (+421 7) 64 36 99 46Fax: (+421 7) 64 28 39 82

E-mail: [email protected]

EUROBATS: Party Signed but not yet entered force Non-party

Competent authority: Ministry for the Environment

Name: Mr. Peter PilinskýAddress:Ministry of the EnvironmentDept. of Nature and Landscape ProtectionNám. L. Stúra 1812 35 BratislavaSlovakia


Appointed member of the Advisory Committee

Name: Dr. Marcel UhrínAddress:National Park Muránska Planina Administrationstr. Janka Král'a 1205001 RevúcaSlovakia

Tel.: (+421 58) 442 2061Fax: (+421 58) 441 6119E-mail: [email protected]

Membership of other committees or working groups:

AEWA: Party Signed but not yet entered force Non-party

Administrative Authority

Name:Address:Ministry of the EnvironmentDept. of Nature and Landscape Protection

Appointed member of the Technical Committee

Name:Address:State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak RepublicLazovná 10

3

Nám. L. Stúra 1812 35 BratislavaSlovakia


Administrative Authority for huntable species

Ministry of the AgricultureDivision for ForestryDobrovicova 12812 66 Bratislava 1Slovakia

Tel.: (+421 7) 59 26 65 14Fax: (+421 7) 59 26 65 11

P.O.Box 5974 01 Banská BystricaSlovakia

Tel.: (+421 48) 415 42 69Fax: (+421 48) 415 50 27E-mail: [email protected]

Membership of other committees or working groups:

4

I(b). Additional General Information

1 Which other government departments are involved in activities/initiatives for the conservation of migratory species inyour country? (Please list.)

1a If more than one government department is involved, describe the interaction/relationship between these governmentdepartments:

2 List the main non-governmental organizations actively involved in initiatives for the conservation of migratory species inyour country, and describe their involvement:

Working Group on Research and Protection of Birds of Prey and Owls (SVODAS) is NGO, whose goals are:

research and conservation of birds of prey and owls in Slovakia; to organize people involved in research andconservation activities; to promote conservation of raptors in public, to provide consulting and organize activitiesconcerning research and conservation.

SVODAS especially concentrates on monitoring of the breeding occurrence of the most endangered species,identification of the factors that are a treat to these species, protection of nesting sites and other. Special attention is givento the problem of electrocution of birds on electric poles of 22 kV power lines. In cooperation with the European ringingcenter in France, SVODAS conducts a ringing program.

Society for Protection of Birds in Slovakia (SOVS)is NGO, which participates in:

research into the ecology and population trends of endangered bird species and their habitats; restoration of habitatssuitable for endangered species, reparation and undertaking of awareness campaigns for the specific groups of stake-holders (hunters, land owners); environmental education at schools.

3 Describe any involvement of the private sector in the conservation of migratory species in your country:

No records

4 Note any interactions between these sectors in the conservation of migratory species in your country:

No records

5

II. Appendix I species

1. BIRDS

1.1 General questions on Appendix I bird species

1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I birdspecies:

Ministry of Environment, Division of Nature and Landscape Protection

2 Is the taking of all Appendix I bird species prohibited by the national implementing Yes Nolegislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?

If other legislation is relevant, please provide details:

2a If the taking of Appendix I bird species is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes Nobeen granted to the prohibition?

If Yes, please provide details:

3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I bird species:

3a What actions are being undertaken to overcome these obstacles?

3b What assistance, if any, does your country require in order to overcome these obstacles?

4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerbird species, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, already introduced exoticspecies (Article III(4)(c))?

4a Describe any factors that may limit action being taken in this regard:

4b What assistance, if any, does your country require to overcome these factors?

1.2 Questions on specific Appendix I bird species

The following section contains a table for each Appendix I bird species for which your country is considered to be a RangeState. Please complete each table as appropriate, providing information in summary form. Where appropriate, pleasecross-reference to information already provided in national reports that have been submitted under other conventions(e.g. Convention on Biological Diversity, Ramsar Convention, CITES). (Attach annexes as necessary.)

SpeciesHaliaeetus albicilla– Common Name(s) White-tailed Eagle

1 Is your country a Range State for this species? Yes No

2 Please provide published distributionreference:

TRNKA, R., TRNKA , A., BOHUŠ, M. 1998. Occurence, abundance, monitoring and conservation of the White-tailed Eagle(Haliaeetus albicilla) in Slovakia in 1996-1997. Nature Conservation Vol.16, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia: 177-191. (inSlovak)

3 Summarise information on population size, trends and distribution (if known):

55 – 60 wintering specimens (45 specimens on Danube in 2002), increasing population trend, most abundant along

6

Danube, since 1999 they have bred here. In 2002 there are 4 breeding pairs along Danube, 1 breeding pair in VihorlatMts., other 2 possible breeding pairs are near Oravska water reservoir and Latorica river. Breeding is being regularlymonitored. During spring migration few specimens occured on Liptovska Mara (3-4 specimens) water reservoir andOravska water reservoir (8-11).

Within the period 1998-2001 – breeding of 3 pairs on Danube has been recorded in 2001, 2 breeding were not succesfulldue to disturbance by forestry activities and illegal video shooting. Further possible breeding of 1 pair near Oravska waterreservoir and 1 pair near Latorica river, has been recorded. There were 40-50 wintering specimens (30-40) along Danube.

During winter accounting along the Danube organized by State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic -Administration of the Danube Floodplains Protected Landscape Area in cooperation with the Faculty of Natural Sciencesof the Comenius University Bratislava and Hungarian Fertőd – Hanság National Park on 26th January 2002 total of 45specimens have been recorded in section between Bratislava and Ostrihom.

4 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)

Research - mapping of occurence, winter accounting of White-tailed Eagles along Danube and in Norther Slovakia,project „Monitoring and protection of White-tailed Eagle in Slovakia“ – R. Trnka, J. Lengyel (SNC SR), Dr. M. Bohuš(FNS Comenius University Bratislava).

Monitoring - monitoring of the breeding pairs in Danube Floodplains - Dr. M. Bohuš, P.Rác (FNS ComeniusUniversity Bratislava), J.Lengyel, J.Chavko (SNC SR), winter accounting (SNC SR - Danube Floodplains PLA, FNS CUBratislava, Mr. Váczi Miklós -NP Fertőd – Hanság, Hungary), nest watching (SNC SR – J. Chavko)

Habitat protection - legislative protection of the habitats (designation of the Protected Range Oravska waterreservoir), 2001/2002 – negotiation on assigning the 500m wide buffer zone around the nest trees for 3 breeding pairsduring the breeding season

Habitat restoration - installation of artificial nests for White-Tailed Eagles near Oravska water reservoir in theframework of the project „Monitoring and protection of White-tailed Eagle in Slovakia“ – R. Trnka (SNC SR)

Other - Winter auxiliary feeding of the White-Tailed Eagles on Oravska and Liptovska Mara water reservoir in theframework of the project„Monitoring and protection of White-tailed Eagle in Slovakia“ – R. Trnka, P. Majko (SNC SR)

5 If no activities have been carried out for this species in the reporting period, what has prevented such action being taken?

6 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species:

- Winter accounting on Danube (Southern Slovakia), Oravská, Liptovská Mara, Tvrdošín, Bešeňová, Nová Bystricawater reservoirs (Northern Slovakia), Zemlínska Šírava water reservoir, Senné & Latorica Ramsar Sites (EasternSlovakia)

- Monitoring

- Nest watching and control of the nesting pairs along Danube and in Northern (Oravská water reservoir) and Eastern(Vihorlat Mts.) Slovakia

- Winter auxiliary feeding of the White-tailed Eagles on Oravská and Liptovská Mara water reservoirs

SpeciesAquila clanga– Common Name(s) Greater Spotted Eagle



HUDEC, K.,ČERNÝ, W. et al. 1977. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds 2. Academia, Prague,Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic: 138-142. (in Czech)

TRNKA, A. 1997. Current List of Birds of Slovakia. Trnava University for Slovak Rarities Committee, Trnava, Slovakia.


Seldom and extremely rare occurrence during the spring and autumn migration

7


Contact person: Jozef Chavko, Birds of Prey and Owls Research and Conservation Group (SVODAS), Hanulova5/D, 844 40 Bratislava, Slovakia

Research

Monitoring – Members of the SVODAS during their other monitoring activities have made some records of thespecies.

Habitat protection

Habitat restoration

Other


Exclusively rare occuring species, protection is restricted only to migration period


Monitoring of migration occurrence

SpeciesAquila heliaca– Common Name(s) Imperial Eagle



HUDEC, K.,ČERNÝ, W. et al. 1977. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds 2. Academia, Prague,Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic: 127-135. (in Czech)


DANKO, Š. et al. 1964. BUTEO Vol. 6, Slovakia. (in Slovak)


Slovak population currently (year 2002) comprises of approximately 40 breeding pairs, trend of the population size isslightly increasing, especially in Eastern Slovakia


Contact persons: Jozef Chavko & Štefan Danko, Birds of Prey and Owls Research and Conservation Group(SVODAS), Hanulova 5/D, 844 40 Bratislava, Slovakia

Research – monitoring of population dynamics, human impacts, food requirements, habitat requirements, etc.

Monitoring – population monitoring throughout Slovakia; almost the entire population is being monitored bySVODAS in cooperation with the State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic.

Habitat protection – guidance of the forestry activities through the negotiation on Forest Management Plans,individual actions on habitat protection.

Habitat restoration – restoration of feeding grounds in the framework of theSpermophilus citellusRestitutionProgramme

Other – nest improvements, nest watching, habitat photo-documentation


Lack of financial sources decreased the opportunities of species protection and management.


- Regular and consistent monitoring of population, especially breeding population

- Monitoring of the population dynamic and trends

- Monitoring of human impact

- Elimination of adverse anthropogenic influence

- Restitution of food sources – restitution of prey species

- Protection of nests against robbers

- Protection and management of the nesting sites in accordance with the Recovery Plan, Action Plan for

8

Implementation of the National Biodiversity Strategy, requirements of the international treaties etc.

- Daily species protection, fixing of the nests damaged by wind, saving of the youngs endangered by kainism andpossible wounds etc.

- Awareness campaign among hunters for prevention of illegal shooting and poisoning of the eagles.

- Implementation of the project of 22 kV electric wires adaptation to prevent the species from accidental wounds andkills

SpeciesAnser erythropus– Common Name(s) Lesser White-fronted Goose



DANKO, Š. 1995. Waterfowl and water-related birds of Senné –Iňačovce (Eastern Slovakia) fishpond area during 1975 –1994. Tichodroma Vol. 8, Bratislava, Slovakia: 22 – 47. (in Slovak)

HUDEC, K. et al. 1994. Fauna of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Birds 1. Academia, Prague, CzechRepublic. (in Czech)

KALIVODOVÁ , E., DAROLOVÁ, A. 1998. Birds of Slovak Section of the Danube and Žitný ostrov. Edition Biosphere, Serieof scientific literature Vol. A1, Bratislava, Slovakia. (in Slovak)

Group of authors, 2002. Atlas of the Distribution of Birds in Slovakia (in press).



Occurrence of the species in Slovakia is evaluated as rare, uncommon. There are older records from the DanubianLowland (1960ies, HUDEC et al., 1994). In Eastern Slovakia is also rare, recorded only several times inside the NationalNature Reserve Senne-fishponds and its surroundings (1970ies – 1980ies, DANKO, 1995).

TRNKA (1997) evaluates the species as rare visitor (vagrant), recorded in Slovakia only before 1990ies.


Research

Monitoring – Since late 1990ies the winter waterfowl accounting is being organized by Society for Protection ofBirds in Slovakia (SOVS) –the BirdLife International partner (coordinator Jozef Ridzoň). Untill 1996 the wintermonitoring was organized by Dr. A. Darolová from the Zoological Institute of the Slovak Academy of Science inBratislava

Habitat protection

Habitat restoration

Other



According to the character of occurrence of the species in Slovakia, no special activities are being planned for the future.

SpeciesAythya nyroca– Common Name(s) Ferruginous Pochard, Ferruginous Duck



DANKO, Š. 1995. Waterfowl and water-related birds of Senné –Iňačovce (Eastern Slovakia) fishpond area during 1975 –1994. Tichodroma Vol. 8, Bratislava, Slovakia: 22 – 47. (in Slovak)

HUDEC, K. et al. 1994. Fauna of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Birds 1. Academia, Prague, CzechRepublic. (in Czech)

KALIVODOVÁ , E., DAROLOVÁ, A. 1998. Birds of Slovak Section of the Danube and Žitný ostrov. Edition Biosphere, Serieof scientific literature Vol. A1, Bratislava, Slovakia. (in Slovak)

9

Group of authors, 2002. Atlas of the Distribution of Birds in Slovakia (in press)


TRNKA, A., 1997. Ornithocenoses of the Pusté Úľany fish ponds – proposed protected site. Nature Conservation Vol 15,Slovak Environmental Agency, Centre of Nature and Landscape Protection Banská Bystrica, Slovakia: 175 – 182. (inSlovak)


TRNKA (1997) evaluates the species as breeding, and regular migrating and wintering species in the period 1990 –1997.Number of breeding pairs is estimated on 20 – 40, while the population trend within 1973 to 1994 is evaluated as“moderate decrease of population by 20 to 50 %“ – the statement is adopted from the MURIN et al. (1994).

In Western Slovakia the species bred near the Gabčíkovo a Číčov (HUDEC et al., 1994), KALIVODOVÁ et DAROLOVÁ

evaluate the species as rare and uncommon breeder of Danubian area. At the pr esent time (2000 – 2001) the species wasnot recorded as breeding in Western Slovakia (RÁC in verb.).

In Záhorie Lowland the species bred near Jakubovo (HUDEC et al., 1994), currently breeding of the species is not known.(JUREČEK in verb.). In Eastern Slovakia the species bred more frequently on several sites (Medzibodrožie, inundation areaof the Latorica river Senné-Iňačovce fishpond area and NNR Senné-fishponds (on the both last sites during 1970 – 19853-10 pairs bred annually), in Košice basin 4 -6 pairs bred annually (HUDEC, l.c.). DANKO (1995) evaluated the species inNNR Senné-fishponds and surrounding fishpond area as sporadically breeding in the number of 10 – 11 pairs (in 1975 –1994). Currently the breeding of the species in the same area is expected but exact number is not known (DANKO,KAŇUCH in verb.).


Research

Monitoring - contact person: Samuel Pačenovský (SOVS), since 2001 also Jozef Lengyel, State Nature Conservancyof the Slovak Republic (SNC SR), Administration of the PLA Dunajské luhy

Habitat protection – protection and management of the Senné-fishponds NNR in cooperation of SNC SR and SOVS(coordinator of SOVS –Dr. Pavol Kaňuch)

Habitat restoration

Other



Future activities will be concentrated on the monitoring and protection of historical and other suitable nesting sites.

SpeciesOtis tarda– Common Name(s) Great Bustard



HUDEC, K.,ČERNÝ, W. et al. 1977. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds 2. Academia, Prague,Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic. (in Czech)



Currently the population of the Great Bustard in Slovakia is represented by 10 nesting hens, wintering populationcomprise of the specimens breeding in Hungary and Austria too, those visit Slovak territories in approximate number of100 specimens. Population in Slovakia is at the critical limit of extinction and it requires supernormal conservationmeasures.

10

4 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available.)Contact person for theconservation of the Great Bustard in Slovakia: Jozef Chavko, Štate Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic

Research - focused on human impact, influence of agricultural activities

Monitorin – regular monitoring within the species range in Slovakia

Habitat protection – guidance on inappropriate agricultural activities (airplane application of pesticides and nutrients,restriction of the isecticides use, guidance on production of inappropriate crops)

Habitat restoration – land rental and planting of native plant communities, restoration of native species of plants andanimals (insects, steppe species)

Other – protection against disturbance on nesting habitats, guidance on hunting, elimination of improper predators onnesting sites.


In the period before year 2000 the habitat protection was not adequately ensured, and/or it was not oriented onestablishment and maintenance of basic habitat reguirements of the species - establishment of permanent wasteland plots.


- habitat protection - long-term land rental and establishment of the wasteland plots on key sites of the speciesoccurrence (nesting and display sites), conservation programme will require consecutive establishment of 2-3pertmanent wasteland plots (of steppe character) with the total area of app. 1000 to1500 ha inside the historicalrange of the species in Slovakia. The established plots will have function of the gene -pool areas for restoration ofthe steppe fauna and flora,

- establishment of the conservation regime to prevent the disturbance on key sites of the species occurence

- conservation and management of the nesting places in accordance to National Recovery Plan for the Great Bustard,Action Plan for the Implementation of the National Biodiversity Strategy, requirements of international treaties etc.

If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any other bird species that islisted in CMS Appendix I, but which is not included in the tables above, please complete a table (provided below) for eachspecies.

Species name,Common Name(s):Acrocephalus paludicola, Aquatic Warbler


HUDECK., et al. 1983. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds 3/II. Academia, Prague, CzechoslovakSocialistic Republic. (in Czech)



In the 1970’s, the species has been registered as accidental breeder in the Eastern Slovakia (no estimations on populationsize has been done) and it has been observed regularly in a small number (up to 5 specimens) on migration in the WesternSlovakia as well. Since that time, no more regular registrations are available and in the Western Slovakia they are missingalmost at all. Until this time it is registered only occasionally on migration (1-2 specimens) and almost exclusively in theEastern Slovakia.

However, no special research and/or regular monitoring of the species have been provided, so it is expected, the species isa regular migrant in small number in Slovakia.


Research

Monitoring

Habitat protection

Habitat restoration

Other


11

Especially due to a small number of specimens only occasionally registered in the country, no special efforts onmonitoring and/or habitat protection activities have been implemented.


There is an effort to monitor the occurrence of the species on appropriate localities especially in the Eastern Slovakia andto prove the regular/irregular migration and probably breeding of the species on these sites.

12

2. MARINE M AMMALS

2.1 General questions on Appendix I marine mammals

1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listedmarine mammals:


2 Is the taking of all Appendix I marine mammals prohibited by the national Yes Noimplementing legislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?

If other legislation is relevant, please provide details: Thus the Slovakia is not a range state for these species thelegislation prohibit the taking of all species listed in the appendices of international treaties for those Slovakia is acontracting party.

2a If the taking of Appendix I marine mammals is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes Nobeen granted to the prohibition?


3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I marine mammals:

Slovakia is not a range state for marine mammals listed in Appendix I



4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerspecies of marine mammal, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, alreadyintroduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))?



2.2 Questions on specific Appendix I marine mammals

If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any marine mammal speciesthat is listed in CMS Appendix I, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.

Species name,Common name(s):




Research

Monitoring

Habitat protection

13

Habitat restoration

Other



14

3 MARINE TURTLES

3.1 General questions on Appendix I marine turtles

1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listedmarine turtles:


2 Is the taking of all Appendix I marine turtles prohibited by the national implementing Yes Nolegislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?


2a If the taking of Appendix I marine turtles is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes Nobeen granted to the prohibition?


3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I marine turtles:

Slovakia is not range state for marine turtles listed in Appendix I



4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerspecies of marine turtles, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, alreadyintroduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))?



3.2 Questions on specific Appendix I marine turtles

If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any marine turtle speciesthat is listed in CMS Appendix I, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.




3 Indicate (with an ‘X’) and briefly describe any activities that have been carried out in favour of this species in thereporting period. (Please provide the title of the project and contact details, where available):

Research

Monitoring

Habitat protection

15

Habitat restoration

Other


5 Describe any future activities that are planned for this species?

16

4 TERRESTRIAL M AMMALS (OTHER THAN BATS )

4.1 General questions on Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats)

1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listedterrestrial mammals (other than bats):


2 Is the taking of all Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats) prohibited by Yes Nothe national implementing legislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?


2a If the taking of Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats) is prohibited by Yes Nolaw, have any exceptions been granted to the prohibition?


3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats):

Slovakia is not a range state for mammal species listed in Appendix I



4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerspecies of terrestrial mammal (other than bats), including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling oreliminating, already introduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))?

4a Describe any factors which limit action being taken in this regard:


4.2 Questions on specific Appendix I terrestrial mammals (other than bats)

If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any terrestrial mammalspecies (other than bats) that is listed in CMS Appendix I , please complete a table (provided below) for each species.





Research

Monitoring

17

Habitat protection

Habitat restoration

Other



18

5 BATS

5.1 General questions on Appendix I bats

1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listedbats:


2 Is the taking of all Appendix I bats prohibited by the national implementing Yes NoLegislation cited in Table I(a) (General Information)?


2a If the taking of Appendix I bats is prohibited by law, have any exceptions Yes NoBeen granted to the prohibition?


3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I bats:

Slovakia is not a range state for bat species listed in Appendix I



4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerspecies of bats, including strictly controlling the introduction of, or controlling or eliminating, already introduced exoticspecies (Article III(4)(c))?



5.2 Questions on specific Appendix I bat species

If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any bat species that is listedin CMS Appendix I, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.





Research

Monitoring

Habitat protection

19

Habitat restoration

Other



20

6 OTHER TAXA

6.1 General questions on Appendix I species belonging to other taxa

1 Identify the Ministry, agency/department, or organisation responsible for leading actions relating to Appendix I listedspecies belonging to taxa not included in sections 1-5 above:


2 Is the taking of all Appendix I species belonging to taxa not included in Yes Nosections 1-5 above, prohibited by the national legislation listed as beingimplementing legislation in Table I(a) (General Information)?


2a If the taking of Appendix I species belonging to taxa not included in Yes Nosections 1-5 above is prohibited by law, have any exceptions beengranted to the prohibition?


3 Identify any obstacles to migration that exist in relation to Appendix I species belonging to taxa not included in sections1-5 above:

Slovakia is not a range state for these species



4 What actions have been taken to prevent, reduce or control factors that are endangering or are likely to further endangerspecies belonging to taxa not included in section 1-5 above, including strictly controlling the introduction of, orcontrolling or eliminating, already introduced exotic species (Article III(4)(c))?



6.2 Questions on specific Appendix I species belonging to other taxa

If you have information indicating that your country should be considered a Range State for any Appendix I listed speciesthat belongs to taxa not included in sections 1-5 above, please complete a table (provided below) for each species.





Research

21

Monitoring

Habitat protection

Habitat restoration

Other



7 LISTING OF OTHER ENDANGERED MIGRATORY SPECIES IN APPENDIX I

1 Is your country a Range State for any other endangered migratory species Yes No

not currently listed in Appendix I?


1a Is your country taking any steps to propose listing any of these species? Yes No


1b What assistance, if any, does your country require to initiate the listing of these species?

22

III. Appendix II Species

1. INFORMATION ON APPENDIX II SPECIES

Information pertaining to the conservation of Appendix II species that are the object of CMS Agreements will have b eenprovided in periodic Party reports to those instruments. It will suffice therefore to reference (below), and preferablyappend, a copy of the latest report that has been submitted to the secretariat each of the Agreement/MoUs to which yourcountry is a Party.

GREAT BUSTARD MoU (2001)

Date of last report: - Period covered:

EUROBATS (1994)

Date of last report: 2001 Period covered: 2001

AEWA (1999)

Date of last report: - Period covered:

2. QUESTIONS ON CMS AGREEMENTS

2.1 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to birds

1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address theConservation needs of Appendix II bird species?

If Yes, what is the current state of development?

2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes NoOf any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressThe conservation needs of Appendix II bird species?


3 If your country has initiated or is participating in the development of an Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding,what assistance, if any, does your country require in order to initiate or participate in the instrument’s development?

4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for birds, including Memorandum of Yes NoUnderstanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?


2.2 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to marine mammals

1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address theConservation needs of Appendix II marine mammal species?


2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes NoOf any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressThe conservation needs of Appendix II marine mammal species?



23

4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for marine mammals, including Yes NoMemorandum of Understanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?


2.3 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to marine turtles

1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address theConservation needs of Appendix II marine turtles?


2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes NoOf any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressThe conservation needs of Appendix II marine turtles?



4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for marine turtles, including Yes NoMemorandum of Understanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?


2.4 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to terrestrial mammals (other than bats)

1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address the conservationNeeds of Appendix II terrestrial mammal species (other than bats)?


2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes NoOf any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressThe conservation needs of Appendix II terrestrial mammal species (other than bat s)?



4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for terrestrial mammals (other than bats), Yes NoIncluding Memorandum of Understanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?


2.5 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to bats

1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address theconservation needs of Appendix II bat species?


2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes Noof any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressthe conservation needs of Appendix II bat species?



24

4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for bats, including Memorandum of Yes NoUnderstanding, planned by your country in the future?


2.6 Questions on CMS Agreements relating to other taxa

1 In the current reporting period, has your countryinitiated the development of any Yes NoCMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, to address theconservation needs of Appendix II species belonging to taxa notincluded in sections 1-6 above?


2 In the current reporting period, has your countryparticipated in the development Yes Noof any CMS Agreements, including Memoranda of Understanding, which addressthe conservation needs of species belonging to taxa not included in sections 1-6 above?



4 Is the development of any CMS Agreement for other taxa, including Memorandum of Yes NoUnderstanding, planned by your country in the foreseeable future?


3. LISTING OF MIGRATORY SPECIES IN APPENDIX II

1 Is your country a Range State for any migratory species that has an unfavourable Yes Noconservation status, but is notcurrently listed in Appendix II and could benefitfrom the conclusion of an Agreement for its conservation?


1a Is your country taking any steps to propose the listing of this/these species in Appendix II? Yes No


1b What assistance, if any, does your country require to initiate the listing of this/these species?

25

IV. National and Regional Priorities

1 Does the conservation of migratory species currently feature in any national Yes Noor regional policies/plans (apart from CMS Agreements)


1a Do these policies/plans cover the following areas (if yes, please provide details):

Yes No

Economic development

Land-use planning

Designation and development of reserves

Development of ecological networks

Planning of powerlines

Planning of fences

Planning of dams

Other

V. Policies on Satellite Telemetry

1 In the current reporting period, has your country undertaken Yes Noconservation/research projects that use satellite telemetry?

If Yes, please provide details (Indicate inter alia the scientific justification for the research, describe briefly the measurestaken to ensure that risks to the welfare of individual animals and – in the case of severely depleted populations – to thespecies are minimised, and summarise the results obtained):

2 Are any future conservation/research projects planned that will use Yes Nosatellite telemetry?

If Yes, please provide details (including the expected timeframe for these projects):

If No, please explain any impediments or requirements in this regard:

VI. Membership

1 Have actions been taken by your country to encourage non-Parties Yes Noto join CMS and its related Agreements?

If Yes, please provide details. (In particular, describe actions taken to recruit the non-Parties that have been identified bythe Standing Committee as high priorities for recruitment.)

1a Identify the agency, department or organization responsible for leading on this action in your country:

26

VII. Global and National Importance of CMS

1 Have actions been taken by your country to increase national, regional Yes Noand/or global awareness of the relevance of CMS and its global importancein the context of biodiversity conservation?


2 Identify the agency, department or organization responsible for leading on this action in your country:

VIII. Mobilization of Resources

1 Has your country made financial resources available for conservation activities having Yes Nodirect benefits for migratory species in your country?


Project “Death poles” aimed at preventing birds from electrocution on electric poles of the external 22 kV power lines inSlovakia, gradual ecologization of 22 kV power lines.

Project “Protection of the imperial eagle” & implementation of National Action Plan for Imperial Eagle aimed at regularmonitoring of the population, regulation of the forest management plans in order to avoid wood logging in regular nestinghabitats, documentation of occurrence of the species during breeding, migration and winter season.

Project “Conservation of Golden Eagle in the Carpathian region” aimed at monitoring of the breeding occurrence,guarding of the nest during breeding season.

Project “Re-establishing of the Great Bustard population in border region with Austria and Hungary” – trilateral projectaimed at the sustainable use of land in breeding habitats of Great Bustard.

Project “Ciconia” aimed at monitoring of the breeding population of White Stork in Slovakia.

Project aimed at the supporting of nesting habitats of peregrine and saker falcons.

Implementation of National Action Plan for Corncrake (Crex crex).

Implementation of National Action Plan for Great Bustard (Otis tarda).

2 Has your country made voluntary contributions to the CMS Trust Fund to support Yes Norequests from developing countries and countries with economies in transition?


3 Has your country made other voluntary financial contributions to support Yes Noconservation activities having direct benefits for migratory species in othercountries (particularly developing countries)?


4 Has your country provided technical and/or scientific assistance to Yes Nodeveloping countries to facilitate initiatives for the benefit of migratoryspecies?


Zoological Garden Bratislava, Slovakia participate in Reintroduction Project of Scimatar-horned Oryx to Sidi TouiNational Park, Tunisia

5 Has your country received financial assistance/support from the CMS Trust Yes NoFund, via the CMS Secretariat, for national conservation activities havingdirect benefits for migratory species in your country?


6 Has your country received financial assistance/support from sources other Yes Nothan the CMS Secretariat for conservation activities having direct benefit formigratory species in your country?


GEF; REC Budapest; Wetlands International; Program PIN MATRA; PHARE, British Embassy, Know How Found;

Ramsar Small Grants Fund,

27

IX. Implementation of COP Resolutions and Recommendations

Please summarize the measures undertaken by your country to impleme nt the substantive, operational Resolutions andRecommendations adopted by the Conference of the Parties, where these have not been mentioned elsewhere in thisreport, giving particular emphasis to those adopted by at the Sixth Meeting (Cape Town, November 1999).

Resolution 6.1. – Concerted Actions for Appendix I species

Slovak republic is a Range State for the only one Appendix I species according to resolution 3.2,4.2, 5.1 and 6.1. - (Otis tarda)for which concerted actions should be undertaken.

Trilateral project aimed at the recovery of Great Bustard population in border region (Austria, Hungary), as well as aimed at thepropagation of environmental friendly methods in agriculture and land use.

Resolution 6.4. – Strategic plan for the CMS

Main objectives and the relevant operational objectives of the Strategic Plan of CMS for 2000 –2005 have been incorporated into the Action Plan for implementation of National Biodiversity Conservation Strategy, as well as in to the National Action Planfor implementation of Ramsar Strategic Plan.

Other remarks:

28

Annex: Questions on specific Appendix II species

The tables below contain the list of all species listed in Appendix II. Boxes have been checked to indicatethe species for which your country is considered to be a Range State. Please amend the boxes whereappropriate. (If you wish to provide further information on any of these species, please attach as anannex.) Please also provide published distribution references where available.

Species RangeState

Not aRange State

Extinct Noinformation

available

Published distributionreference

CHIROPTERA

Rhinolophus ferrumequinum

(only European populations)

UHRIN et al. (1996)

Rhinolophus hipposideros


UHRIN et al. (1996)

Rhinolophus euryale


UHRIN et al. (1996)

Rhinolophus mehelyi


Rhinolophus blasii


Myotis bechsteini


DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)HORÁČEK et al. (1995)

Myotis blythi


DANKO et MIHÓK (1989)

Myotis brandtii



Myotis capaccinii


Myotis dasycneme


UHRIN et al. (1995)HORÁČEK et HANÁK (1989)MATIS et al. (2000)

Myotis daubentoni


UHRIN et al. (1995)

Myotis emarginatus



Myotis myotis



Myotis mystacinus



Myotis nattereri



Pipistrellus kuhli


Pipistrellus nathusii



29

Species RangeState

Not aRange State


available


Pipistrellus pipistrellus



Pipistrellus savii


Nyctalus lasiopterus


DANKO (1974)

Nyctalus leisleri



Nyctalus noctula



Eptesicus nilssonii



Eptesicus serotinus



Vespertilio murinus



Barbastella barbastellus



Plecotus auritus



Plecotus austriacus



Miniopterus schreibersii


UHRIN et al. (1997)

Tadarida teniotis

CETACEA

Platanista gangeticagangetica

Pontoporia blainvillei

Inia geoffrensis

Delphinapterus leucas

Monodon monoceros

Phocoena phocoena

(North and Baltic Sea populations)

Phocoena phocoena

(western North Atlantic population)

Phocoena phocoena

(Black Sea population)

Neophocaena phocaenoides

Phocoenoides dalli

Phocoena spinipinnis

Phocoena dioptrica

30

Species RangeState

Not aRange State


available


Sousa chinensis

Sousa teuszii

Sotalia fluviatilis

Lagenorhynchus albirostris

(only North and Baltic Seapopulations)

Lagenorhynchus acutus


Lagenorhynchus australis

Lagenorhynchus obscurus

Grampus griseus


Tursiops aduncus

(Arafura/Timor Sea populations)

Tursiops truncatus


Tursiops truncatus

(western Mediterraneanpopulation)

Tursiops truncatus


Stenella attenuata

(eastern tropical Pacific population)

Stenella attenuata

(Southeast Asian populations)

Stenella longirostris

(eastern tropical Pacificpopulations)

Stenella longirostris


Stenella coeruleoalba


Stenella coeruleoalba


Delphinus delphis


Delphinus delphis


Delphinus delphis


31

Species RangeState

Not aRange State


available


Delphinus delphis


Lagenodelphis hosei


Orcaella brevirostris

Cephalorhynchuscommersonii

(South American population)

Cephalorhynchus eutropia

Cephalorhynchus heavisidii

Orcinus orca

(eastern North Atlantic population)

Orcinus orca

(eastern North Pacific population)

Globicephala melas


Berardius bairdii

Hyperoodon ampullatus

PINNIPEDIA

Phoca vitulina

(only Baltic and Wadden Seapopulations)

Halichoerus grypus

(only Baltic Sea populations)

Monachus monachus

PROBOSCIDEA

Loxodonta africana

SIRENIA

Trichechus manatus

Dugong dugon

ARTIODACTYLA

Vicugna vicugna

Oryx dammah

Gazella gazella

GAVIIFORMES

Gavia stellata

(Western Palearctic populations)

ReM, ReW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Gavia arctica arctica ReM, ReW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Gavia arctica suschkini

Gavia immer immer

(Northwest European population)

RaM, RaW according to TRNKA

(1997)

32

Species RangeState

Not aRange State


available


Gavia adamsii

(Western Palearctic population)

PODICIPEDIFORMES

Podiceps grisegenagrisegena

ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)

Podiceps auritus


RaM, RaW according to TRNKA

(1997)

PELECANIFORMES

Phalacrocorax nigrogularis

Phalacrocorax pygmeus AcB, AcV? according to TRNKA

(1997)

Pelecanus onocrotalus


AcV according to TRNKA (1997)

Pelecanus crispus [AcV] according to TRNKA (1997)

CICONIIFORMES

Botaurus stellaris stellaris


ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Ixobrychus minutus minutus


ReB, ReM, [AcW] according toTRNKA (1997)

Ixobrychus sturmii

Ardeola rufiventris

Ardeola idae

Egretta vinaceigula

Casmerodius albus albus


ReB, ReV, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Ardea purpurea purpurea

(populations breeding in theWestern Palearctic)


Mycteria ibis

Ciconia nigra ReB, ReM, [AcW] according toTRNKA (1997)

Ciconia episcopusmicroscelis

Ciconia ciconia ReB, ReM, AcW according toTRNKA (1997)

Plegadis falcinellus ReV according to TRNKA (1997)

Geronticus eremita

Threskiornis aethiopicusaethiopicus

Platalea alba

(excluding Malagasy population)

Platalea leucorodia RaB, ReV according to TRNKA

(1997)

Phoenicopterus ruber

33

Species RangeState

Not aRange State


available


Phoenicopterus minor

ANSERIFORMES

Dendrocygna bicolor

Dendrocygna viduata

Thalassornis leuconotus

Oxyura leucocephala

Cygnus olor ReB, ReW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Cygnus cygnus ReM, ReW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Cygnus columbianus AcV according to TRNKA (1997)

Anser brachyrhynchus AcV according to TRNKA (1997)

Anser fabalis ReM, RaV, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Anser albifrons ReM, [AcV], ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Anser erythropus [RaV] according to TRNKA (1997)

Anser anser ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Branta leucopsis

Branta bernicla

Branta ruficollis

Alopochen aegyptiacus

Tadorna ferruginea

Tadorna cana

Tadorna tadorna RaM, RaW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Plectropterus gambensis

Sarkidiornis melanotos

Nettapus auritus

Anas penelope ReM, ReW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Anas strepera ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Anas crecca ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Anas capensis

Anas platyrhynchos ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Anas undulata

Anas acuta RaB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Anas erythrorhyncha

34

Species RangeState

Not aRange State


available


Anas hottentota

Anas querquedula ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)

Anas clypeata ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)

Marmaronettaangustirostris

Netta rufina ReB, ReM, [AcW] according toTRNKA (1997)

Netta erythrophthalma

Aythya ferina ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Aythya nyroca ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Aythya fuligula ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Aythya marila ReM, RaW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Somateria mollissima RaM, RaW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Somateria spectabilis

Polysticta stelleri

Clangula hyemalis RaM, RaW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Melanitta nigra ReM, RaW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Melanitta fusca ReM, RaW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Bucephala clangula ReM, ReW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Mergellus albellus ReM, ReW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Mergus serrator ReM, RaW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Mergus merganser ReM, ReW according to TRNKA

(1997)

FALCONIFORMES

Pandion haliaetus ReM, AcW? according to TRNKA

(1997)

GALLIFORMES

Coturnix coturnix coturnix ReB, ReM, [AcW] according toTRNKA (1997)

SPHENISCIFORMES

Spheniscus demersus

PROCELLARIIFORMES

Diomedea exulans

35

Species RangeState

Not aRange State


available


Diomedea epomophora

Diomedea irrorata

Diomedea nigripes

Diomedea immutabilis

Diomedea melanophris

Diomedea bulleri

Diomedea cauta

Diomedea chlororhynchos

Diomedea chrysostoma

Phoebetria fusca

Phoebetria palpebrata

Macronectes giganteus

Macronectes halli

Procellaria cinerea

Procellaria aequinoctialis

Procellaria aequinoctialisconspicillata

Procellaria parkinsoni

Procellaria westlandica

GRUIFORMES

Porzana porzana



Porzana parva parva ReB, ReM according to TRNKA

(1997)

Porzana pusilla intermedia [AcV] according to TRNKA (1997)

Fulica atra atra

(Mediterranean and Black Seapopulations)

Aenigmatolimnasmarginalis

Sarothrura boehmi

Sarothrura ayresi

Crex crex ReB, ReM according to TRNKA

(1997)

Grus leucogeranus

Grus virgo (Syn.Anthropoides virgo)

[AcV] according to TRNKA (1997)

Grus paradisea

Grus carunculatus

Grus grus ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Chlamydotis undulata

(only Asian populations)

36

Species RangeState

Not aRange State


available


Otis tarda ReB, ReW according to TRNKA

(1997)

CHARADRIIFORMES

Himantopus himantopus RaB, RaV according to TRNKA

(1997)

Recurvirostra avosetta ReB, RaV according to TRNKA

(1997)

Dromas ardeola

Burhinus oedicnemus RaB, RaM according to TRNKA

(1997)

Glareola pratincola AcV according to TRNKA (1997)

Glareola nordmanni AcV according to TRNKA (1997)

Pluvialis apricaria ReM, [AcW] according to TRNKA

(1997)

Pluvialis squatarola ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Charadrius hiaticula ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Charadrius dubius ReB, ReM according to TRNKA

(1997)

Charadrius pecuarius

Charadrius tricollaris

Charadrius forbesi

Charadrius pallidus

Charadrius alexandrinus AcB, ReM, according to TRNKA

(1997) according to KRIŠTÍN et al.(1998) evaluated as DD

Charadrius marginatus

Charadrius mongulus

Charadrius leschenaultii

Charadrius asiaticus

Eudromias morinellus [RaM] according to TRNKA (1997)

Vanellus vanellus ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)

Vanellus spinosus

Vanellus albiceps

Vanellus senegallus

Vanellus lugubris

Vanellus melanopterus

Vanellus coronatus

Vanellus superciliosus

Vanellus gregarius (SynChettusia gregaria)

Vanellus leucurus

Gallinago media RaM according to TRNKA (1997)

37

Species RangeState

Not aRange State


available


Gallinago gallinago ReB, ReM, ReW according toTRNKA (1997)

Lymnocryptes minimus ReM, RaW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Limosa limosa ReB, ReM according to TRNKA

(1997)

Limosa lapponica RaM according to TRNKA (1997)

Numenius phaeopus ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Numenius tenuirostris

Numenius arquata ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)

Tringa erythropus ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Tringa totanus ReB, ReM, AcW according toTRNKA (1997)

Tringa stagnatilis ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Tringa nebularia ReM, [AcW] according to TRNKA

(1997)

Tringa ochropus ReM, ReW according to TRNKA

(1997)

Tringa glareola ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Tringa cinerea AcV according to TRNKA (1997)

Tringa hypoleucos ReB, ReM, RaW according toTRNKA (1997)

Arenaria interpres ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Calidris tenuirostris

Calidris canutus RaM according to TRNKA (1997)

Calidris alba RaM according to TRNKA (1997)

Calidris minuta ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Calidris temminckii ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Calidris maritima

Calidris alpina ReM, [AcW] according to TRNKA

(1997)

Calidris ferruginea ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Limicola falcinellus ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Philomachus pugnax ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Phalaropus lobatus ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Phalaropus fulicaria

Larus hemprichii

Larus leucophthalmus

Larus ichthyaetus

(West Eurasian and Africanpopulation)

Larus melanocephalus AcB according to TRNKA (1997)

38

Species RangeState

Not aRange State


available


Larus genei

Larus audouinii

Larus armenicus

Sterna nilotica nilotica

(West Eurasian and Africanpopulations)

Sterna caspia

(West Eurasian and Africanpopulations)

ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Sterna maxima albidorsalis

Sterna bergii

(African and Southwest Asianpopulations)

Sterna bengalensis

(African and Southwest Asianpopulations)

Sterna sandvicensissandvicensis

Sterna dougallii

(Atlantic population)

Sterna hirundo hirundo


ReB, ReM according to TRNKA

(1997)

Sterna paradisaea

(Atlantic populations)

Sterna albifrons RaB, ReM according to TRNKA

(1997)

Sterna saundersi

Sterna balaenarum

Sterna repressa

Chlidonias niger niger ReB, ReM according to TRNKA

(1997)

Chlidonias leucopterus

(West Eurasian and Africanpopulation)

[RaB] according to TRNKA (1997)

CORACIIFORMES

Merops apiaster ReB, ReM according to TRNKA

(1997)

Coracias garrulus ReB, ReM according to TRNKA

(1997)

PSITTACIFORMES

Amazona tucumana

PASSERIFORMES

Hirundo atrocaerulea

Acrocephalus paludicola [AcB], RaM according to TRNKA

(1997)

39

Species RangeState

Not aRange State


available


TESTUDINATA

Chelonia depressa

Chelonia mydas

Caretta caretta

Eretmochelys imbricata

Lepidochelys kempii

Lepidochelys olivacea

Dermochelys coriacea

Podocnemis expansa

CROCODYLIA

Crocodylus porosus

ACIPENSERIFORMES

Huso huso BARUŠ, OLIVA et al. (1995)

Huso dauricus

Acipenser baerii baicalensis

Acipenser fulvescens

Acipenser gueldenstaedtii BARUŠ, OLIVA et al. (1995)

Acipenser medirostris

Acipenser mikadoi

Acipenser naccarii

Acipenser nudiventris BARUŠ, OLIVA et al. (1995)

Acipenser persicus

Acipenser ruthenus

(Danube population)

BARUŠ, OLIVA et al. (1995)

Acipenser schrenckii

Acipenser sinensis

Acipenser stellatus BARUŠ, OLIVA et al. (1995)

Acipenser sturio

Pseudoscaphirhynchuskaufmanni

Pseudoscaphirhynchushermanni

Pseudoscaphirhynchusfedtschenkoi

Psephurus gladius

LEPIDOPTERA

Danaus plexippus

ORECTOLOBIFORMES

Rhincodon typus

40

All species of each of the Families below are listed in Appendix II. If your country is a Range State forany of the species in these Families, please enter th e species name in the first column, under the relevantFamily heading. Please indicate (with a ‘X’) whether your country is a Range State or the species isextinct and, where appropriate, please provide published distribution references. (Space is provided forten species in each Family. If additional lines are required, please attach the information as an annex.)

Species Range State Extinct Published distributionreference

Order FALCONIFORMES , Family Cathartidae

RangeState

Extinct

RangeState

Extinct

RangeState

Extinct

RangeState

Extinct

RangeState

Extinct

RangeState

Extinct

RangeState

Extinct

RangeState

Extinct

RangeState

Extinct

RangeState

Extinct

Order FALCONIFORMES , Family Accipitridae

Pernis apivorus RangeState

Extinct ReB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

full reference and abbreviations explained in Annex

Milvus migrans RangeState


Milvus milvus RangeState

Extinct ReB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)

Haliaeetus albicilla RangeState


Gyps fulvus RangeState

Extinct RaV according to TRNKA (1997)

Circaetus gallicus RangeState


Circus aeruginosus RangeState

Extinct ReB, ReM, RaW according to TRNKA (1997)

full reference and abbreviations explained in Annex

Circus cyaneus RangeState

Extinct ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)

Circus macrourus RangeState

Extinct RaM according to TRNKA (1997)

Circus pygargus RangeState

Extinct ReB, ReM, [AcW] according to TRNKA (1997)

Order FALCONIFORMES , Family Falconidae

41


Falco naumanni RangeState

Extinct [RaB], [RaM] according to TRNKA (1997)

Falco tinnunculus RangeState

Extinct ReB, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)

Falco vespertinus RangeState

Extinct RaB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Falco columbarius RangeState

Extinct ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)

Falco subbuteo RangeState


Falco cherrug RangeState


Falco peregrinus RangeState

Extinct RaB, ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)

RangeState

Extinct

RangeState

Extinct

RangeState

Extinct

Order PASSERIFORMES, Family Muscicapidae

Erithacus rubecula RangeState


Luscinia luscinia RangeState


Luscinia megarhynchos RangeState


Luscinia svecica RangeState


Phoenicurus ochruros RangeState


Phoenicurus phoenicurus RangeState


Saxicola rubetra RangeState


Saxicola torquata RangeState


Oenanthe oenanthe RangeState


42

Annex:

List of further Appendix II species of the Order Falconiformes, Family Accipitridae and OrderPasseriformes, Family Muscicapidae.


Order FALCONIFORMES , Family Accipitridae

Accipiter gentilis RangeState


full reference and abbreviations explained below

Accipiter nisus RangeState


Buteo buteo RangeState


Buteo rufinus RangeState

Extinct RaM, RaW according to TRNKA (1997)

Buteo lagopus RangeState

Extinct ReMf, ReWf according to TRNKA (1997)

Aquila pomarina RangeState


Aquila clanga RangeState

Extinct RaM, [AcW] according to TRNKA (1997)

Aquila heliaca RangeState


Aquila chrysaetos RangeState


Hieraaetus pennatus RangeState

Extinct RaB, ReM according to TRNKA (1997)

Order PASSERIFORMES, Family Muscicapidae

Monticola saxatilis RangeState


Turdus torquatus RangeState


Turdus merula RangeState


Turdus pilaris RangeState


Turdus philomelos RangeState


Turdus iliacus RangeState

Extinct [AcB], ReM, ReW according to TRNKA (1997)

Turdus viscivorus RangeState


Locustella naevia RangeState


Locustella fluviatilis RangeState


43


Locustella luscinioides RangeState


full reference and abbreviations explained below

Acrocephalus melanopogon RangeState

Extinct ReB, ReV according to TRNKA (1997)

Acrocephalus paludicola RangeState

Extinct [AcB], RaM according to TRNKA (1997); according toKRIŠTÍN et al. (1998) evaluated as DD

Acrocephalus schoenobaenus RangeState


Acrocephalus palustris RangeState


Acrocephalus scirpaceus RangeState


Acrocephalus arundinaceus RangeState


Hippolais icterina RangeState


Sylvia nisoria RangeState


Sylvia curruca RangeState


Sylvia communis RangeState


Sylvia borin RangeState


Sylvia atricapilla RangeState


Phylloscopus trochiloides RangeState

Extinct AcB, RaM according to TRNKA (1997); according toKRIŠTÍN et al. (1998) evaluated as DD

Phylloscopus sibilatrix RangeState


Phylloscopus collybita RangeState


Phylloscopus trochilus RangeState

Extinct ReB, ReM, AcW? according to TRNKA (1997)

Regulus regulus RangeState


Regulus ignicapillus RangeState

Extinct ReB, ReM, AcW according to TRNKA (1997)

Muscicapa striata RangeState


Ficedula parva RangeState


Ficedula albicollis RangeState


Ficedula hypoleuca RangeState


Panurus biarmicus RangeState


45

Further reference and remarks on specific Appendix II fish species

Species Further reference and remarks

ACIPENSERIFORMES

Huso huso last record from the slovak section of the Danube dated in 1925 (KHIN 1957); evaluated as EXaccording to proposal of the Red List of Fish of Slovakia (HENSEL2001); currently being bredonly ex-situ in the Institute of Fishing and Aquaculture located in Častá

Acipenser gueldenstaedtii last records from the Danube originate to 1st half of the 20th century (HOLČÍK, 1989) indicatedin BARUŠet OLIVA (1995); evaluated as EX according to proposal of the Red List of Fish ofSlovakia (HENSEL2001); breeding only ex-situ in the Institute of Fishing and Aquaculturelocated in Častá

Acipenser nudiventris last records from the Danube according to HECKEL et KNER (1858) and HERMAN (1887) inBARUŠet OLIVA (1995); evaluated as EX according to proposal of the Red List of Fish ofSlovakia (HENSEL2001)

Acipenser ruthenus

(Danube population)

according to proposal of the Red List of Fish of Slovakia the species is evaluated as LR:cd(HENSEL2001); only species of the order not being protected in Slovakia; it is being used forcommon fishing, bred also in facilities of Institute of Fishing and Aquaculture inČastá

Acipenser stellatus last catch from the Danube near Komárno (from 1926) indicated by HOLČÍK (1959) in BARUŠ

et OLIVA (1995); evaluated as EX according to proposal of the Red List of Fish of Slovakia(HENSEL2001)

Abbreviations used for the evaluation of occurence character(TRNKA 1997):Re: regular for the period 1990-1997Ra: irregular (rare) for the period 1990-1997Ac: accidental for the period 1800-1997 (up to 10 occurences only)B: breeding birdsM: migrating birdsW: wintering birdsV: visitor[ ]: occurence before 1990 onlyf: fluctuating species

Status according to Red List of Birds of Slovakia(KRIŠTÍN et al. 1998):EX ExtinctCR Critically EndangeredEN EndangeredVU VulnerableLR Lower Risk

cd conservation dependentnt near threatenedlc least concern

DD Data DeficientNE Not Evaluated

46

References:

BARUŠ, V., OLIVA , O. (eds.) 1995. Lampreys(Petromyzontes)and Fish(Osteichtyes)(1).Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Republic. Academia, Prague, Czech Republic. (in Czech)

DANKO, Š. 1974.Nyctalus lasiopterus(Schreber, 1780) in Czechoslovakia. Lynx Vol. 15,Czechoslovakia: 5–8. (in Slovak)

DANKO, Š. 1995. Waterfowl and water-related birds of Senné –Iňačovce (Eastern Slovakia)fishpond area during 1975 – 1994. Tichodroma Vol. 8, Bratislava, Slovakia: 22 – 47. (inSlovak)

DANKO, Š. et al. 1964. BUTEO Vol. 6, Slovakia. (in Slovak)

DANKO, Š., MIHÓK, J. 1989. New data on the occurence of bats in Eastern Slovakia.Proceedings of the East-Slovakian Museum, Natural Sciences Vol. 29, Košice, Slovakia:131–160. (in Slovak)

Group of authors, 2002. Atlas of the Distribution of Birds in Slovakia (in press).

HENSEL, K. 2001. Proposal of Red List of Fish of Slovakia. State Nature Conservancy of theSlovak Republic, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia. Msc. (in Slovak)

HORÁČEK, I., HANÁK, V. 1989. Distributional status ofMyotis dasycneme.In: HANÁK, V.,HORÁČEK, I., GAISLER, J. (eds.). European Bat Research 1987, Charles Univ. Press, Prague,Czech Republic: 565–590.

HORÁČEK, I., HANÁK, V., ZIMA , J., ČERVENÝ, J. 1995. Towards the bat fauna of Slovakia I. -Summer discoveries 1979-1992. Bats 1: 39–54. (in Czech)

HUDEC K., et al. 1983. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds 3/II.Academia, Prague, Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic. (in Czech)

HUDEC, K. et al. 1994. Fauna of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Birds 1.Academia, Prague, Czech Republic. (in Czech)

HUDEC, K., ČERNÝ, W. et al. 1977. Fauna of the Czech and Slovak Socialistic Republic. Birds2. Academia, Prague, Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic. (in Czech)

KALIVODOVÁ , E., DAROLOVÁ, A. 1998. Birds of Slovak Section of the Danube and Žitnýostrov. Edition Biosphere, Serie of scientific literature Vol. A1, Bratislava, Slovakia. (inSlovak)

KRIŠTÍN, A., DANKO, Š., DAROLOVÁ, A., KOCIAN, Ľ., KROPIL, R., MURIN, B., STOLLMANN ,A., URBAN, P. 1998. Red List and Ecosozological Status of Birds (Aves) of Slovakia.Ochrana prírody 16. Slovak Environmental Agency – Centre of Nature and LandscapeProtection Banská Bystrica, Slovakia: 219-232. (in Slovak)

MATIS, Š., DANKO, Š., PJENČÁK, P., UHRIN, M., FULÍN, M. 2000. New data on the occurenceof Pond bat (Myotis dasycneme) in Slovakia, Vespertilio 4, Bat Protection Group Slovakiaand Czech Bat Conservation Trust, Revúca and Prague: 127–134. (in Slovak with Englishsummary)

TRNKA, A. 1997. Current List of Birds of Slovakia. Trnava University for Slovak RaritiesCommittee, Trnava, Slovakia.

TRNKA, A., 1997. Ornithocenoses ofthe Pusté Úľany fish ponds – proposed protected site.Nature Conservation Vol 15, Slovak Environmental Agency, Centre of Nature and LandscapeProtection Banská Bystrica, Slovakia: 175 – 182. (in Slovak)

TRNKA, R., TRNKA , A., BOHUŠ, M. 1998. Occurence, abundance, monitoring andconservation of the White-tailed Eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) in Slovakia in1996-1997. NatureConservation Vol.16, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia: 177-191. (in Slovak)

UHRIN, M., DANKO, Š., OBUCH, J. 1995. Distribution of bats in Slovakia, part II, In: URBAN,P. (ed.): Research and Conservation of mammals in Slovakia 2, Slovak Environment AgencyBanská Bystrica, Slovakia: 71–85. (in Slovak)

47

UHRIN, M., DANKO, Š., OBUCH, J., HORÁČEK, I., PAČENOVSKÝ, S., PJENČÁK, P., FULÍN, M.1996. Distributional patterns of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in Slovakia. Part 1, Horshoebats (Rhinolophidae). Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem. 60, Prague, Czech Republic: 247-279.

UHRIN, M., LEHOTSKÁ, B., BENDA, P., LEHOTSKÝ, R., MATIS, Š. 1997. Distribution of bats inSlovakia, Part 3,Miniopterus schreibersi.Vespertilio 2: 113–130. (in Slovak)

slovakia / slovaquie / eslovaquia · 2014-12-10 · 3 nám. l. stúra 1 812 35 bratislava slovakia...

Documents