sleep and sleep disturbance

2
COMMENTARY Pediatric Dermatology Vol. 15 No. 4 324-325, 1998 Sleep and Sleep Disturbance Ian MacLusky, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.P.C. Pulmonary Function, Laboratory and Sleep Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Approximately 30% of our life is spent asleep (up to 50% in infants). The interaction between sleep and dis- ease, however, remains a neglected area of study. Al- though we now have a much clearer understanding of the normal structure of sleep, despite 40 years of study there remain unresolved questions regarding the consequences of sleep disturbance and sleep deprivation. Sleep is not a heterogeneous state. Normal sleep is comprised of two distinct states, rapid eye movement (REM) and non-rapid eye movement (NREM), each be- ing associated with distinct EEG and behavioral charac- teristics (1). Each sleep state can be further subdivided. NREM is comprised of four distinct patterns, ranging from stage 1 (light sleep) to stage 4 (deep sleep), while REM can be subdivided into tonic and phasic periods. During a normal night, an adult has four or five sleep cycles, each approximately 90 minutes in length, char- acterized by alternating periods of NREM and REM sleep. During the initial sleep cycles, slow wave (stage 3 and 4) NREM sleep is the predominant pattern, with increasing amounts of REM and stage 1 and 2 NREM sleep as the night progresses. Although any physician can attest to the consequences of insufficient sleep, the precise role of sleep and the specific function of each sleep state remain matters for debate. NREM sleep is associated with a reduction in motor tone and respiratory and cortical activity, as well as a slowing of metabolic rate, compatible with a quies- cent or reparative function. REM sleep is characterized by both increased cortical activity (2), and increased CNS glucose metabolism (3). It is believed that REM sleep has a role in integration of CNS activity, either in consolidating new information (explaining the predomi- nance of REM sleep in infancy) or in integration of new information into long-term memory (4). It is fairly easy to document the behavioral conse- quences of sleep deprivation in adults, “being sleepy” being primarily due to overall loss of slow wave sleep, resulting in measurable decrements both in alertness and intellectual performance (5). Initial studies simply looked at the effect of overall sleep deprivation on day- time functioning. As discussed by Stores et al., subse- quent studies have suggested that not only overall sleep quantity, but also sleep quality and the consequences of sleep fragmentation may have significant impact on sub- sequent daytime functioning (5,6). Moreover, sleep has roles other than just maintaining alertness. Recent work has shown a complex interrelationship between sleep and neuroendocrine, immune function, and thermal regula- tion (7), sleep disturbance having an adverse impact on these systems. What remains unclear is how sleep dis- turbance affects these systems, and precisely how much sleep disturbance, as well as which sleep state and over how long a period, is required to have a significant im- pact. The impact of sleep disturbance in children is even less well established. First, children spend significantly more time in REM sleep than do adults (up to 50% of overall sleep compared to as little as 6% in adults) (8). As noted, the biologic necessity for REM remains un- clear, but its predominance during childhood would sug- gest a role in intellectual maturation or organization. Since muscle hypotonia is a primary feature of REM sleep, obstructive sleep apnea in children tends to occur primarily during this sleep stage, frequently resulting in selective REM sleep fragmentation. This REM sleep fragmentation has the potential for subtle but long-term impact on intellectual performance. It is, however, diffi- cult to document the consequences of sleep fragmenta- tion in children, since their symptoms differ significantly from adults. Rather than producing hypersomnolence, sleep deprivation in children produces symptoms of ir- Address correspondence to Ian MacLusky, Pulmonary Function Laboratory and Sleep Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 Uni- versity Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1x8. 324

Upload: ian-maclusky

Post on 15-Jul-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sleep and Sleep Disturbance

COMMENTARY

Pediatric Dermatology Vol. 15 No. 4 324-325, 1998

Sleep and Sleep Disturbance Ian MacLusky, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.P.C.

Pulmonary Function, Laboratory and Sleep Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Approximately 30% of our life is spent asleep (up to 50% in infants). The interaction between sleep and dis- ease, however, remains a neglected area of study. Al- though we now have a much clearer understanding of the normal structure of sleep, despite 40 years of study there remain unresolved questions regarding the consequences of sleep disturbance and sleep deprivation.

Sleep is not a heterogeneous state. Normal sleep is comprised of two distinct states, rapid eye movement (REM) and non-rapid eye movement (NREM), each be- ing associated with distinct EEG and behavioral charac- teristics (1). Each sleep state can be further subdivided. NREM is comprised of four distinct patterns, ranging from stage 1 (light sleep) to stage 4 (deep sleep), while REM can be subdivided into tonic and phasic periods. During a normal night, an adult has four or five sleep cycles, each approximately 90 minutes in length, char- acterized by alternating periods of NREM and REM sleep. During the initial sleep cycles, slow wave (stage 3 and 4) NREM sleep is the predominant pattern, with increasing amounts of REM and stage 1 and 2 NREM sleep as the night progresses.

Although any physician can attest to the consequences of insufficient sleep, the precise role of sleep and the specific function of each sleep state remain matters for debate. NREM sleep is associated with a reduction in motor tone and respiratory and cortical activity, as well as a slowing of metabolic rate, compatible with a quies- cent or reparative function. REM sleep is characterized by both increased cortical activity (2), and increased CNS glucose metabolism (3). It is believed that REM sleep has a role in integration of CNS activity, either in consolidating new information (explaining the predomi- nance of REM sleep in infancy) or in integration of new information into long-term memory (4).

It is fairly easy to document the behavioral conse-

quences of sleep deprivation in adults, “being sleepy” being primarily due to overall loss of slow wave sleep, resulting in measurable decrements both in alertness and intellectual performance (5). Initial studies simply looked at the effect of overall sleep deprivation on day- time functioning. As discussed by Stores et al., subse- quent studies have suggested that not only overall sleep quantity, but also sleep quality and the consequences of sleep fragmentation may have significant impact on sub- sequent daytime functioning (5,6). Moreover, sleep has roles other than just maintaining alertness. Recent work has shown a complex interrelationship between sleep and neuroendocrine, immune function, and thermal regula- tion (7), sleep disturbance having an adverse impact on these systems. What remains unclear is how sleep dis- turbance affects these systems, and precisely how much sleep disturbance, as well as which sleep state and over how long a period, is required to have a significant im- pact.

The impact of sleep disturbance in children is even less well established. First, children spend significantly more time in REM sleep than do adults (up to 50% of overall sleep compared to as little as 6% in adults) (8). As noted, the biologic necessity for REM remains un- clear, but its predominance during childhood would sug- gest a role in intellectual maturation or organization. Since muscle hypotonia is a primary feature of REM sleep, obstructive sleep apnea in children tends to occur primarily during this sleep stage, frequently resulting in selective REM sleep fragmentation. This REM sleep fragmentation has the potential for subtle but long-term impact on intellectual performance. It is, however, diffi- cult to document the consequences of sleep fragmenta- tion in children, since their symptoms differ significantly from adults. Rather than producing hypersomnolence, sleep deprivation in children produces symptoms of ir-

Address correspondence to Ian MacLusky, Pulmonary Function Laboratory and Sleep Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 Uni- versity Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1x8.

324

Page 2: Sleep and Sleep Disturbance

ritability, poor concentration, and reduced attention span (9). Although less obvious, the effects of sleep distur- bance on intellectual performance in children are none- theless very real. Second, children are growing. Adverse effects on neuroendocrine function have the potential for long-term sequelae, the growth failure commonly seen in children with obstructive sleep apnea possibly reflecting the impact of sleep deprivation on neuroendocrine func- tion (10). The effect of sleep disturbance on immune function in children remains a lamentably underinvesti- gated area. Therefore we need to remember not only that common diseases frequently produce sleep disturbance, but also that subsequent sleep disturbance may directly impact on both general health and response to treatment. Drs. Stores, Burrows, and Crawford are therefore to be lauded for their attempt to explore the effect of a com- mon problem, atopic dermatitis, on sleep organization in children.

REFERENCES

1. Carskadon MA, Dement WC. Normal human sleep: an overview. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, eds. Prin- ciples and practice of sleep medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:16-25.

2. Steriade M. Brain electrical activity and sensory process- ing during waking and sleep states. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, eds. Principles and practice of sleep medi- cine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994: 105-124.

3. Maquet P. Positron emission tomography studies of sleep and sleep disorders. J Neurol 1997;244:S23-S28.

4. Giuditta A, Ambrosini MV, Montagnese P, et al. The se- quential hypothesis of the function of sleep. Behav Brain Res 1995;69: 157-166.

5. Bonnet MH. Sleep deprivation. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, eds. Principles and practice of sleep medi- cine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:50-68.

6. Pilcher JJ, Huffcutt AI. Effects of sleep deprivation on performance: a meta-analysis. Sleep 1996;19:3 18-326.

7. Moldofsky H. Sleep and the immune system. Int J Immu- nopharmacol 1995; 17:649-654.

8. Anders TF, Sadeh A, Appareddy V. Normal sleep in neo- nates and children. In: Ferber R, Kryger MH, eds. Pnn- ciples and practice of sleep medicine in children. Philadel- phia: WB Saunders, 19957-18.

9. Ali NJ, Pitson D, Stradling JR. Sleep disordered breathing: effects of adenotonsillectomy on behaviour and psycho- logic functioning. Eur J Pediatr 1996;155:56-62.

10. Cooper BG, White JE, Ashworth LA, Alberti KG, Gibson GJ. Hormonal and metabolic profiles in subjects with ob- structive sleep apnea syndrome and the acute effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treat- ment. Sleep 1995;18:172-179.