slac hep budget meeting summary discussion charts

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009

SLAC HEP Budget MeetingSummary Discussion Charts

S. M. Kahn, D. B. MacFarlane, R. AlvaSLAC

Rev 5 – Preliminary


Outline of Presentation* Statement of SLAC PPA Vision and Near-Term Priorities for

Operating Programs, and New Projects.– Addresses Laboratory role, strengths and strategic goals and program

objectives.

* Scenario A, (B, C)– B&R Reallocation Summary Sheet– High Level Summary– 2009-2011 Detailed year-by-year breakouts– Summary Budget Spreadsheet

* Backup Material on Individual Programs– ATLAS, EXO-200 and EXO, LSST, JDEM, SuperB, Theory, Accelerator

Development, ILC SRF, PEP-II D&D, Detector R&D Test Beam.


SLAC Vision for Particle Physics and Astrophysics

* Maintain a leading role at the Energy Frontier through enhanced participation in ATLAS, the current LHC machine, and their planned upgrades, and through leadership of R&D for the ILC and associated detector concepts.

* Become the lead laboratory within the DOE-SC complex for particle astrophysics and cosmology, and for non-accelerator physics generally. (KIPAC, FGST, LSST, JDEM, EXO, GeODM, AGIS, CMB).

* Maintain strong partnerships at the Intensity Frontier through facilitating US participation in an international SuperB Project, and through supporting the design and development of the Project X facility.

* Become the lead laboratory within the DOE-SC complex for electron accelerator research. Play a stewardship role for accelerator physics across disciplines within the Office of Science. Develop key innovations and technologies for future high-gradient accelerators.


SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and Astrophysics: Operating Programs

* Continue to facilitate the optimal exploitation and preservation of the BaBar dataset.– Support necessary computing infrastructure through the completion of the intense and

steady analysis phases – Facilitate transition into the archival phase, and ensure that the BaBar data remain

accessible to a broad community.

* Operate the LAT for FGST, and continue to spearhead scientific discovery with this unique particle astrophysics observatory.

– Support the operations, software development, and instrument support functions of the LAT, as performed by the ISOC.

– Maintain a vigorous LAT-based scientific analysis program at SLAC.

* Play a significant role in ATLAS and LHC accelerator commissioning, initial science analyses, and computing support.

* Maintain world-leading accelerator-science program– World-leading programs in beam physics theory, advanced computation, and accelerator

design.


SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and Astrophysics: Operating Programs

* Maintain a crucial, enabling role in technology development for the ILC.– L-band rf.– Electron source.– Final focus and IR design.

* Lead high-gradient X-band research in the US.– Establish the fundamental limits to acceleration gradient and the optimal design of rf

structures.

* Maintain world-leading theoretical programs in particle physics and particle astrophysics and cosmology.

* Plan and execute the orderly D&D of the BaBar detector and the PEP-II facility.


SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and Astrophysics: New Programs

* Bring LSST into development as a joint NSF-DOE project.– Lead the design and development of the LSST camera.– Participate in the data management, with particular emphasis on new tools for handling and

querying the extremely large database.– Shepherd the involvement of the HEP community in this exciting dark energy experiment.

* Play a major role in the upgrade of the ATLAS detector and the LHC– ATLAS Phase 1: Insertable B-layer project.– ATLAS Phase 2: Tracker and TDAQ upgrades.– Enhancement of ATLAS computing at SLAC.– Extend LHC contributions to include fabrication of upgrade collimators, development of PS2

design, and LLRF and feedback improvements.

* Construct and operate FACET for forefront experiments in beam-driven plasma wakefield acceleration.

* Participate in JDEM construction, development, and science analyses.– Provision of warm electronics for one or more of the focal plane instruments.– Possible role in fine guiding.– Participation in weak lensing and strong lensing science investigations.


SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and Astrophysics: New Programs

* Develop and construct a ton-scale version of EXO for the initial suite of mid-scale experiments at DUSEL.

– Complete operation and testing of EXO-200.– Perform the necessary R&D and engineering for full-EXO.

* Facilitate a significant US role in SuperB in Italy.– Provide components from PEP-II to reduce the cost of SuperB construction.– Play a leadership role in the machine design and construction.– Develop and coordinate participation in the SuperB detector collaboration.

* Participate in Project-X R&D with contributions to rf power systems.

* Perform state of the art experiments in laser dielectric acceleration.

* Develop high power X-band rf sources to optimally exploit high gradient structures.

* Initiate and maintain R&D efforts to a enable a SLAC leadership role in longer-range programs:

– SiD, GeODM, and AGIS


SLAC HEP Budget Meeting UpdateModified Scenarios B and C

S. M. Kahn, D. B. MacFarlane, R. AlvaSLAC

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 9

Modified Scenario B

* High Level Impacts– Maintains present core research staffing levels with no need for reductions through attrition. – BABAR D&D as planned; PEP-II D&D delayed until 2012. – LSST ramp-up, assume $1.5 M (FY10) and $3M (FY12) of PED funding. – EXO concept only developed at the 200 kg level.– Reduced electron research program due to BABAR falloff; reduced SuperB involvement, & small

ongoing ILC detector R&D studies.– Continue growth of ATLAS, leading to SLAC role on ATLAS Phase 1 IBL and TDAQ ATLAS upgrades

with BNL as lead; continue effort on LHC accelerator commissioning and upgrades.– Accelerator science program as planned. – Develop test beam and X-band rf source proposals for future funding consideration.– Project X & JDEM warm electronics role commensurate with additional funding from lead labs and/or

other agencies.

2009 -2015

Description FY 2008FY 2009

Mod. FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Core Programs 60,865$ 61,181$ 62,780$ 64,665$ 66,605$ 68,604$ 70,663$ 72,782$

B Factory Ops/D & D 35,994$ 12,907$ 11,034$ 10,010$ 9,496$ 9,330$ 9,330$ 9,330$

Projects /LHC /ILC/Other 6,568$ 21,464$ 17,312$ 24,248$ 25,675$ 31,113$ 44,566$ 34,032$

SLAC Total 103,427$ 95,552$ 91,126$ 98,923$ 101,776$ 109,047$ 124,559$ 116,144$

SLAC FTEs* 366 349 345 341 347 353 353 353

* does not include Projects or SciDAC


Modified Scenario B* Strategic Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?

– Maintain leadership in current electron accelerator physics, but future direction in doubt without clear path for SuperB and ILC physics programs.

– Establish SLAC as the lead laboratory in particle astrophysics and cosmology for DOE-SC, although prospects for development of future underground program unclear.

– Continue leadership role at the Energy Frontier through an enhanced role in ATLAS and ongoing development of the ILC.

– Play a stewardship role for accelerator physics across disciplines within the Office of Science. Develop key innovations and technologies for future high-gradient accelerators.

* What major accomplishments have been or will be achieved?

– BABAR Intensive and Steady analysis supported.– FGST support and science exploitation.– LSST executed as a major DOE contribution to the project.– Enhanced ATLAS role enabled, including upgrade contribution.– FACET implementation and development of acc science novel concepts.

* Significant issues and concerns– No provision for full EXO as part of initial suite of DUSEL experiments.– No provision for US contribution to SuperB if project proceeds on projected timescale.– No provision for industrialization of SC RF 1.3 GHz sources.

2009 -2015


Modified Scenario B

* High level impacts– No further attrition in core staff. ATLAS growth continues, electron reduced and

reduced Super B involvement; some attrition in Theory.* Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?

– As previously noted.* What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?

– In addition to previously noted, LSST CD-1, R&D for full EXO and SuperB concept development.

– FACET starts construction and acc science ramps-up according to plan.– JDEM warm electronics and Project X role commensurate with external funding.

* Significant issues and concerns– Accelerated FACET construction funded from stimulus package will be challenging.

2009

Description FY 2008Delta

FY09-FY08FY 2009Mod. CR % Change

Core Programs 60,865$ 316$ 61,181$ 1%

B Factory Ops/D & D 35,994$ (23,087)$ 12,907$ -64%

Projects /LHC /ILC/Other 6,568$ 14,896$ 21,464$ 227%

SLAC Total 103,427$ (7,875)$ 95,552$ -8%

SLAC FTEs* 366 (17) 349 -5%



Modified Scenario B

* High level impacts– Reduction of 4 FTEs in B Factory Ops; BABAR D&D continues as planned, but not yet able to start of

PEP-II D&D– Project line: LSST ramp-up assumes ~$1.5 M of PED funding in 2010, with FACET construction ending.– PED funding for ATLAS phase 1 upgrade with BNL as lead.

* Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?– As previously noted.

* What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?– BABAR Intensive analysis winds down and transitions to Steady analysis.– ATLAS IBL design effort achieves CD-1.– LSST proceeds to CD-2.– Finish FACET construction, ramp-up PWFA and laser accelerator science as planned.– JDEM warm electronics and Project X role commensurate with external funding.

* Significant issues and concerns– Some competition for people and resources among construction projects.

2010

Description FY 2008FY 2009Mod. CR

Delta FY10-FY09 FY 2010 % Change

Core Programs 60,865$ 61,181$ 1,599$ 62,780$ 3%

B Factory Ops/D & D 35,994$ 12,907$ (1,873)$ 11,034$ -15%

Projects /LHC /ILC/Other 6,568$ 21,464$ (4,152)$ 17,312$ -19%

SLAC Total 103,427$ 95,552$ (4,426)$ 91,126$ -5%

SLAC FTEs* 366 349 (4) 345 -1%



Modified Scenario B

* High level impacts– Another 4 FTE reduction in B Factory Ops; BABAR D&D and PEP-II maintenance at ~$6.5M, but

resources are insufficient to start PEP-II D&D until 2012.– Project line increases by ~$7M due to: LSST ramp-up (assuming $3M of PED funding for FY2011), the

first fulll year of FACET operations, and an additional $1M investment to replace aging KIPAC computing equipment.

– Construction funding for ATLAS phase 1 upgrade with BNL as lead.– Continue planned Accelerator Science growth.

* Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?– As previously noted.– Moving ATLAS phase 1 upgrade and LSST projects through CD reviews into the construction phase.

* What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?– As previously noted.– BABAR Steady analysis ongoing.

* Significant issues and concerns– Phasing of new initiative development schedules.

2011

Description FY 2008FY 2009Mod. CR FY 2010


Core Programs 60,865$ 61,181$ 62,780$ 1,884$ 64,665$ 3%

B Factory Ops/D & D 35,994$ 12,907$ 11,034$ (1,023)$ 10,010$ -9%

Projects /LHC /ILC/Other 6,568$ 21,464$ 17,312$ 6,936$ 24,248$ 40%

SLAC Total 103,427$ 95,552$ 91,126$ 7,797$ 98,923$ 9%

SLAC FTEs* 366 349 345 (4) 341 -1%



SLACModified Scenario B

detail

B&R Description FY 2008FY 2009Modified

FY 2010 Modified FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

KA1202011 Accelerator Operations: PEPII MMS 15,534 1,913 1,970 2,030 KA1202011 Accelerator Operations: PEP II D&D 566 583 600 5,000 9,250 9,250 9 ,250 KA1202012 Detector Operations 8,610 3,867 3,226 2,872 1,500 KA1202012 Babar D&D 4,181 4,374 4,428 2,916 KA120201 B-fac tory Operations Total 24,144 10,527 10,153 9,930 9 ,416 9,250 9,250 9,250

ST B Factory 39 35 31 37 43 43 43B-fac tory Comple x Total 35,994 12,907 11,034 10,010 9,496 9,330 9,330 9 ,330

0 -4,009 (3,386) 730 246 80 80 80 Control 35994 16,916 14,420 9,280 9,250 9,250 9,250 9 ,250

Core ResearchFTEs 25 30 35 40 44 44 44

KA110102 Proton Research ops 3,200 6,254 7,419 8,717 10,079 11,301 11,640 11,989 FTEs 35 30 25 20 16 16 16

KA120102 Electron Research ops 8,899 7,178 6,389 5,506 4,571 3,788 3,902 4 ,019 FTEs 92 92 92 92 92 92 92

KA130102 Non-Accelerator Research ops 15,757 22,669 23,349 24,049 24,771 25,514 26,279 27,067 FTEs 40 39 38 37 37 37 37

KA140102 Theoretical Research ops 7,300 7,725 7,756 7,789 7,823 8,058 8,300 8 ,549 Core EPP Research 35,156 43,825 44,913 46,061 47 ,243 48,661 50,121 51,625

Core Technologies R&DFTEs 40 41 42 43 43 43 43

KA150102 National La b Acce l Science 9,201 9,802 10,096 10,599 11 ,117 11,450 11,794 12,147KA150102 Na tiona l Lab Accel S cience EQU 300 300 309 318 328 338 348

FTEs 18 18 18 18 18 18 18KA1502011 Ge nera l Accel Development 11,232 4,052 4,173 4,298 4,427 4,560 4,697 4 ,838

FTEs 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 KA150302 National La b De te ctor De velopme nt 5,276 3,203 3,299 3,398 3,500 3,605 3,713 3 ,824

Core Technologies R&D 25,709 17,356 17,868 18,604 19 ,362 19,943 20,542 21,157

FTEs ST 263 263 263 263 263 263 263

Core Programs 60,865 61,181 62,780 64,665 66,605 68,604 70,663 72,782 0 5,386 5,311 5,472 5,636 5,806 5,981 6 ,160

Control 60,865 55,795 57,469 59,193 60,969 62,798 64,682 66,622

KA1301032 LSST MIE 0 0 1,446 3,000 5,000 10,000 23,000 12,000KA1301032 EXO R&D 0 0 - - - - - - KA1501041 FACET: MIE 0 8,000 - - - - - KA1501041 FACET: Ops 0 0 2,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6 ,000

Research Projects Total 0 8,000 3,446 9,000 11,000 16,000 29,000 18,000

LHC R&D ProgramKA1102054 ATLAS Ope rations 668 622 641 660 680 700 721 743 KA1102053 LHC Support (LARP) 1,405 1,467 1,511 1,556 1,603 1,651 1,701 1 ,752

LHC R&D Program Total 2,073 2,089 2,152 2,216 2 ,283 2,351 2,422 2,495FTEs 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

ILC R&DKA1502021 Lab ILC Acce l R&D 3,670 11,300 11,639 11,988 12,348 12,718 13,100 13,493

ILC R&D Total 3,670 11,300 11,639 11,988 12,348 12,718 13,100 13,493 FTEs 41 41 41 41 41 41 41

OtherKA120103 Univers ity S ervice Accounts 69 31 31 - - - - KA130102 Na tiona l Lab Resea rch EQU - 1,000 - - - - KA140103 Lab SciDAC Resea rch 702 0 - - - - - - KA140104 Theory Othe r 54 44 44 44 44 44 44 44

Other Total 825 75 75 1,044 44 44 44 44FTEs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Projects/LHC/ILC/Other 6,568 21,464 17,312 24,248 25 ,675 31,113 44,566 34,032FTEs: w/o Research Projects or SciDAC 47 47 47 47 47 47 47

SLAC HEP Total 103,427 95,552 91,126 98,923 101,776 109,047 124,559 116,144 FTEs: SLAC HEP Total w/o R Projects & SciDAC 349 345 341 347 353 353 353


Modified Scenario C

* High Level Impacts– Expands Scenario B to include full-scale EXO and significant US role in SuperB.

• Begin full EXO in FY2013, as part of the initial suite of experiments at DUSEL, with PED in FY2011-2012, construction start in FY2013 and SLAC as lead.

• Begin SuperB as a new construction project starting in FY2012, with PED in 2011, assuming investment in detector and accelerator by US community with SLAC as lead.

– Exploit core data management capability developed for BABAR to enable enhanced ATLAS Analysis Facility.

– Assume funding to construct test beam for detector R&D program (2009 and 2010),– Assume successful competition for accelerator development funding

• X-band rf sources, $9M over 5 years to develop viable rf source. • TT60 High Radiation Test Facility, $1M to provide beam dump and window by end of CY2010.

2009 -2015

Description FY 2008FY 2009Mod. PB FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Core Programs 60,865$ 62,740$ 64,571$ 66,494$ 68,488$ 70,544$ 72,661$ 74,841$

B Factory Ops/D & D 35,994$ 14,169$ 15,480$ 16,030$ 13,046$ 9,330$ 9,330$ 9,330$

Projects /LHC /ILC/Other 6,568$ 22,624$ 24,910$ 38,178$ 49,255$ 62,507$ 84,873$ 70,672$

SLAC Total 103,427$ 99,533$ 104,961$ 120,701$ 130,789$ 142,381$ 166,864$ 154,843$

SLAC FTEs* 366 360 383 394 384 372 372 372



Modified Scenario C

* Strategic Priorities: What Scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?

– A program at this level is commensurate with the full vision we articulated for PPA at SLAC.

* What Major accomplishments have been or will be achieved?– Enhanced ATLAS role enabled, including major upgrade contribution.– BABAR Intensive and Steady State analysis supported; D&D completed in a

timely way.– SLAC and US community provide crucial leadership for SuperB project in Italy,

with BABAR and PEP-II components and major new hardware contributions.– FGST support and science exploitation.– LSST executed as a major DOE contribution to the project.– FACET implementation and development of Acc Science novel concepts.– Full EXO developed as a major component of the initial program at DUSEL.

* Significant issues and concerns:– Phasing of various construction remains a significant challenge.

2009 -2015


Modified Scenario C

* High level impacts– Expand the scope of FACET to include the double sail boat configuration.– Initial $0.75M funding for test beam facility based on proposal

* Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?– Continue development of full EXO and SuperB for consideration in later years.

* What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?– FACET construction accelerated.– Test beam design completed and construction started.

* Significant issues and concerns– FACET cost estimates yet to be baselined and confirmed.

2009

Scenario B +

Description FY 2008Delta

FY09-FY08FY 2009Mod. PB % Change

Core Programs 60,865$ 1,875$ 62,740$ 3%

B Factory Ops/D & D 35,994$ (21,825)$ 14,169$ -61%

Projects /LHC /ILC/Other 6,568$ 16,056$ 22,624$ 244%

SLAC Total 103,427$ (3,894)$ 99,533$ -4%

SLAC FTEs* 366 (6) 360 -2%



Modified Scenario C

* High level impacts– Remaining $0.75M funding for test beam facility based on proposal

* Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?– Moving full EXO R&D forward and continuing to develop US role on SuperB.

* What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?– Complete test beam and begin operations. – Begin new accelerator development projects.

* Significant issues and concerns– Potential competition for resources as multiple construction projects ramp-up.

2010

Scenario B +

Description FY 2008FY 2009Mod. PB


Core Programs 60,865$ 62,740$ 1,830$ 64,571$ 3%

B Factory Ops/D & D 35,994$ 14,169$ 1,311$ 15,480$ 9%

Projects /LHC /ILC/Other 6,568$ 22,624$ 2,286$ 24,910$ 10%

SLAC Total 103,427$ 99,533$ 5,428$ 104,961$ 5%

SLAC FTEs* 366 360 23 383 6%



Modified Scenario C

* High level impacts– PED funding for full EXO ~$1.9M for 2011 assuming construction starts in FY13.– PED funding for SuperB $2.4M for the detector and $3.3M for the collider, assuming construction starts

in FY12. – Strengthen data analysis capability with the ATLAS Analysis facility: $1.5M for equipment and $1.2M

operational support, ramping to 7 FTEs in 2012.– Additional $1M (non-core) for general accelerator development.

* Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?– Moving full EXO and SuperB from development into construction.

* What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?– EXO and SuperB proceed to CD-1.– Begin development of ATLAS Analysis Facility.– Continue accelerator development projects.

* Significant issues and concerns– Aggressive program for current workforce.

2011

Scenario B +

Description FY 2008FY 2009Mod. PB FY 2010


Core Programs 60,865$ 62,740$ 64,571$ 1,923$ 66,494$ 3%

B Factory Ops/D & D 35,994$ 14,169$ 15,480$ 550$ 16,030$ 4%

Projects /LHC /ILC/Other 6,568$ 22,624$ 24,910$ 13,267$ 38,178$ 53%

SLAC Total 103,427$ 99,533$ 104,961$ 15,740$ 120,701$ 15%

SLAC FTEs* 366 360 383 11 394 3%



SLACB&R Description FY 2007 FY 2008

FY 2009Modified President Proposal FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

KA1202011 Accelerator Operations: PEPII MMS 36,400 15,534 1,913KA1202011 Accelerator Operations: PEP II D&D 1,000 7,000 9,250 9 ,250 9,250 9 ,250 9,250 KA1202012 Detector Operations 23,946 8,610 3,867 3 ,226 2,872 1 ,500 KA1202012 Babar D&D 5,009 4 ,374 3,828 2 ,216 KA120201 B-fac tory Operations Total 60,346 24,144 11,789 14,600 15,950 12,966 9,250 9,250 9,250

ST B Factory 43 61 67 55 44 44 44B-fac tory Comple x Total 78,496 35,994 14,169 15,480 16,030 13,046 9,330 9 ,330 9,330

0 0 -2,747 1,060 6,750 3 ,796 80 80 80 Control 78496 35994 16,916 14,420 9,280 9 ,250 9,250 9 ,250 9,250

Core Research

FTEs ST 264 264 264 264 263 263 263

Core Programs 48,569 60,865 62,740 64,571 66,494 68,488 70,544 72 ,661 74,841 0 0 6,945 7,102 7,301 7 ,519 7,746 7 ,979 8,219

Control 48,569 60,865 55,795 57,469 59,193 60,969 62,798 64 ,682 66,622

Research ProjectsKA1301032 LSST MIE 0 0 0 1,446 3,000 5,000 10,000 23 ,000 12,000 KA1301032 EXO R&D 0 0 0 1,860 4 ,020 10,720 20 ,360 20,360 KA12010 - ** S upe r B De te ctor - P ED 2,400 5 ,000 5,800 5 ,800 5,500 KA1301032 JDEM* warm electronicsKA12 IBL (FYI only…SLAC not the lead) KA15020 - ** S upe r B Colla ide r - P ED 3,300 7 ,800 7,800 6 ,750 3,050 KA1501041 FACET: MIE 0 0 7,200 7,113 1,205 - - - - KA1501041 FACET: Ops 0 0 0 100 6,000 6 ,180 6,365 6 ,556 6,753

Research Projects Total 0 0 7,200 8,659 17,765 28,000 40,685 62 ,466 47,663

LHC R&D ProgramKA1102054 ATLAS Ope rations 180 668 622 641 660 680 700 721 743 KA1102053 LHC Support (LARP) 898 1,405 1,467 1,511 1,556 1 ,603 1,651 1 ,701 1,752 KA11 ATALS Analysis Facilities EQU - 1,500 2 ,300 2,300 2 ,300 2,300 KA11 ATALS Analysis Facilities Ops - 1,208 1 ,750 1,803 1 ,857 1,912

LHC R&D Program Total 1,078 2,073 2,089 2,152 4,924 6,333 6,454 6,579 6,707FTEs 6 6 11 13 13 13 13

ILC R&D Total 16,716 3,670 10,460 10,774 11,097 11,430 11,773 12 ,126 12,490 FTEs 37 37 37 37 37 37 37

OtherKA120103 Univers ity S ervice Accounts 193 69 31 31 - - - - KA130102 Na tiona l Lab Resea rch EQU - - 1,000 - - - - KA140103 Lab SciDAC Resea rch 680 702 0 - - - - - - KA140104 Theory Othe r 54 54 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 KA1502011 Gene ral Acce l De ve lopme nt- Non Core 2,000 3,000 3,348 3,448 3,551 3,658 3,768KA1502011 Gene ral Acce l De ve lopme nt- Non Core -EQU 0 250 0 0 0 0 0

Other Total 927 825 2,075 3,325 4,392 3,492 3,595 3,702 3,812FTEs 10 15 15 15 15 15 15

Projects/LHC/ILC/Other 18,721 6,568 21,824 24,910 38,178 49,255 62,507 84,873 70,672FTEs: w/o Research Projects or SciDAC 53 58 63 65 65 65 65

SLAC HEP Total 145,786 103,427 98,733 104,961 120,701 130,789 142,381 166,864 154,843 FTEs: SLAC HEP Total w/o R Projects & SciDAC 360 383 394 384 372 372 372

Modified Scenario C


What is next with the budget * As previously mentioned, with the exception of FACET the 2009 and 2010 budgets are

very consistent with current level of spending. Thus what you should expect is :– Minor or no changes to your budget. – But there will be some major re-bucketing in the “DOE - HEP B&R codes”, that may mean new

charge numbers for your group.– Potentially more granularity in our tracking by project, particularly in KIPAC. – Please support these changes working with your Financial Planner.

* Mid Year Check-Point – We have already started our Mid year checkpoint, during this and next month. One of the

Financial Planners will be meeting with you to review your budget and current level of spending

– This is a good time to correct spending trends to avoid overspending, but also to ensure that the right people and services get charged to the correct accounts. Your financial planner will be working with you.

* Specifically if you are new to owning a budget. – There is an overview training that should answer most of your questions, about finance and

budget management . You are encouraged to attend.– The training will be held at Kavli 3rd Floor Conference Room, next Wednesday (3/25) from

10:00-11:30 am.– You can sign-in via SLAC web.

slac hep budget meeting summary discussion charts

Documents

particle physics

accelerator physics

accelerator design

accelerator development

leading role

preliminary budget briefing

budget briefing w

ohep staff