skytrain’s experience in mitigating noise … · skytrain’s experience in mitigating noise matt...

12
SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1

Upload: others

Post on 05-Oct-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise

Matt DoyleMechanical Engineer

BC Rapid Transit CompanyVancouver, BC

1

Page 2: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

Vehicles

2

Page 3: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

Unique Components of SkyTrain• Propelled by a Linear Induction Motor mounted on the bogie (i.e. no propulsion forces through the wheels)

• Forced steering bogies (based on angle between car body and bogie) allow radial steering to curve radii of 50 m

• Fully automated operation (no drivers)  • Direct fixation of rail to concrete guideway

3

Page 4: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

Noisy History of SkyTrain –1985-1990

• Corrugation across the system, leading to extensive research and maintenance efforts

• New wheel profiles created for MK‐I vehicle• Extensive track grinding exercise, to remove corrugation and restore an appropriate rail profile

4

Page 5: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

Noisy History of SkyTrain –1990 - 2000

• Relatively steady state• Maintenance grinding efforts undertaken with in‐house staff

• Wheel turning interval fluctuated between 150K to 60K as rail grinding effort was optimized

5

Page 6: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

Noisy History of SkyTrain –2000-2010

• New vehicle introduced (with a wheel profile designed for a different system) 

• Wheel turning set at 60K for MK‐I, and 80K for MK‐II

• Start of rail spalls at joints in the system

6

Page 7: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

Rail Spall

7

Page 8: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

Noisy History of SkyTrain –2010-2015

• 48 new cars added to existing fleet• Visual evidence of rail defects accelerating in growth and appearance

• First rail break discovered in 2012 • At weld repair location

• Corrugation back across the system• Issues keeping rotary grinders in service

8

Page 9: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

Rail Defects

9

Page 10: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

Rail Defects

10

Page 11: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

Rail Defects

11

Page 12: SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise … · SkyTrain’s Experience in Mitigating Noise Matt Doyle Mechanical Engineer BC Rapid Transit Company Vancouver, BC 1. Vehicles 2

Back at the Start• Extensive grinding effort to restore rail to desired profile

• Review of wheel profiles to determine if better profile is available

• Review of maintenance effort across system, to determine resources required for optimal maintenance

12