simulating complex satellites and a space-based ... · pdf filesimulating complex satellites...
TRANSCRIPT
Simulating Complex Satellites and a Space-Based Surveillance Sensor Simulation
Cody R. Singletary and Francis K. Chun Department of Physics, U.S. Air Force Academy
ABSTRACT
Maintaining space situational awareness requires the ability to track earth-bound satellites in order to know and predict their position, movement, size, and physical features. However, there are many satellites in orbit that are simply too small or too far away to resolve by conventional optical imaging. We can use photometric techniques to gather information about the body in question, but the problem comes in how we interpret the light curve data. Light curves are created by measuring the intensity of reflected sunlight off of the object as it passes overhead. The intensity is dependent on a variety of factors to include the size, shape, orientation, and material composition of the satellite. When we attempt to solve the inverse problem for light curves, we are attempting to extract information about these different factors. Forward modeling of photometric light curves provides a way to generate a large amount of data under controlled conditions for working the inverse problem and is an effective way to test Non-Resolved Space Object Identification (NRSOI) techniques. Currently, there are few implementations of such modeling programs, one of which only allows simple geometric shapes with the option of antennas. We present our modification to that existing code to create complex models plus our new code to calculate shadowing on the complex object. Then we show the results from the new model and a comparison to the original tool. The next generation of space surveillance sensors will be on satellites. Space based sensors avoid many of the problems of ground based sensors, such as, waiting for lighting conditions to match satellite passes and a night sky. These sensors are restricted only by sun exclusion angle and line of sight around the Earth. This allows for more effective techniques and a much longer time on target. We present an addition to the existing code to consider a sensor in orbit. The code is generalized to provide flexibility in testing different orbital parameters and provides pass prediction with predictive forward modeling for any orbit.
1. INTRODUCTION
Space situational awareness is a mission of growing importance for the Air Force and the United States. As more and more countries develop their space capabilities, it will become vital for the U.S. to maintain awareness of all objects orbiting the earth, especially as it pertains to U.S. security and space capability. Being able to track satellites in order to maintain a catalog, will need to evolve into characterizing those satellites. High-resolution imagery of satellites will certainly provide a means of characterization, but as satellites become smaller or as the range to satellites increases, it will become harder and harder to obtain the requisite high-resolution imagery (Fig. 1). Thus other means for characterizing satellites will need to be developed. Research into non-resolvable space object identification techniques is beginning, especially with the adaptation of standard astronomical observational techniques to satellites. Analysis of a satellite’s time-varying photometric signature can provide some information on its form, fit, and function.
A satellite’s photometric light curve is the intensity of reflected sunlight off of the object as it passes overhead. The intensity is dependent on a variety of factors to include the size, shape, orientation, and material composition of the satellite. When we attempt to invert a satellite’s light curve, we are attempting to extract information about these different factors.
Forward modeling of photometric light curves provides a way to generate a large amount of data under controlled conditions for working the inverse problem and is an effective way to test Non-Resolved Space Object Identification (NRSOI) techniques. Currently there are two ways of generating this data. One is to use ray-tracing on a complex model of the satellite, a task which requires enormous computing power and time. The second way, which we are using here is to create simpler models of satellite bodies and use albedo-area calculations with the Cook-Torrance BRDF model. This is a much faster, albeit less accurate method.
Report Documentation Page Form ApprovedOMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering andmaintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, ArlingtonVA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if itdoes not display a currently valid OMB control number.
1. REPORT DATE SEP 2009 2. REPORT TYPE
3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2009 to 00-00-2009
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Simulating Complex Satellites and a Space-Based Surveillance Sensor Simulation
5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
5b. GRANT NUMBER
5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER
5e. TASK NUMBER
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Air Force Academy,Department of Physics,USAF Academy,CO,80840
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)
11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S)
12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 2009 Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 1-4 Sep, Maui, HI.
14. ABSTRACT Maintaining space situational awareness requires the ability to track earth-bound satellites in order toknow and predict their position, movement, size, and physical features. However, there are many satellitesin orbit that are simply too small or too far away to resolve by conventional optical imaging. We can usephotometric techniques to gather information about the body in question, but the problem comes in howwe interpret the light curve data. Light curves are created by measuring the intensity of reflected sunlightoff of the object as it passes overhead. The intensity is dependent on a variety of factors to include the size,shape, orientation, and material composition of the satellite. When we attempt to solve the inverse problemfor light curves, we are attempting to extract information about these different factors. Forward modelingof photometric light curves provides a way to generate a large amount of data under controlled conditionsfor working the inverse problem and is an effective way to test Non- Resolved Space Object Identification(NRSOI) techniques. Currently, there are few implementations of such modeling programs, one of whichonly allows simple geometric shapes with the option of antennas. We present our modification to thatexisting code to create complex models plus our new code to calculate shadowing on the complex object.Then we show the results from the new model and a comparison to the original tool. The next generation ofspace surveillance sensors will be on satellites. Space based sensors avoid many of the problems of groundbased sensors, such as, waiting for lighting conditions to match satellite passes and a night sky. Thesesensors are restricted only by sun exclusion angle and line of sight around the Earth. This allows for moreeffective techniques and a much longer time on target. We present an addition to the existing code toconsider a sensor in orbit. The code is generalized to provide flexibility in testing different orbitalparameters and provides pass prediction with predictive forward modeling for any orbit.
15. SUBJECT TERMS
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT Same as
Report (SAR)
18. NUMBEROF PAGES
10
19a. NAME OFRESPONSIBLE PERSON
a. REPORT unclassified
b. ABSTRACT unclassified
c. THIS PAGE unclassified
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18
Fig.
The initial Directoratedetermine observationobject idenviewed frocubesats [2sided cylindifficult to
Our first tarectangularthe code foviable mod
In additiondifferent asspace-basedata for a s
2.1. Compu
To model tindividual distance froorientationshape requthe overall
When we bfor the algofrom the recause shadused in bodcurrently c
The verticeThese vertito arrange
. 1. Degradatio
photometric me of the Air Fosatellite pass gn location. Th
ntification probom closely spac2]. The initial nders, and othe extract inform
ask was to crear solar panels) or shadowing edel, and determ
n to the complespects of obsered sensors planspace based sen
utational Algo
the intensity offacets of the siom the satellite
n of the facet wuires accounting facet intensity
began adaptingorithm. We mueflectance areadowing are lit. dy centered cocalculating the
es of the shadoices define thethe vertices in
on of high-reso
modeling tool wrce Research L
geometry and ahis tool has beeblems such as aced observers [tool included vr regular geom
mation? In answ
ate a technique and make mor
effects. Once tmine whether w
ex body modelirving with a spnned for the futnsor as it obser
2. M
rithm
f a satellite’s phimulated objece to the sensor,
with respect to tg for the shado
y by subtracting
g the code for cust find the fac
a on the shadowThese facets aordinates to printensity.
owing facet are perimeter of thorder that they
olution images
we started withLaboratory (AFallows a user ton used in the p
analyzing when[1]. A version very simple con
metric shapes. Wwering this que
to combine there complex struhis was done, w
we can extract m
ing, we felt it wpace-based sensture. We againrved other sate
MODELING
hotometric lighct for each time, the solar phasthe sun and theowing from oneg out the shado
complex shapecets which cauwed facet. Ourare previously sroject the lit “sh
e now in the plahe shadow, buy appear on the
with increasin
h was developeFRL). The simo define satellitpast by AFRL tn single facets of this tool hanvex shapes suWe ask, can westion, we had
e simple shapeuctures. Once we compared tmore informati
would be necessor, which is esn modified the ellites. This wo
OF COMPLE
ht curve, the cue step in the runse angle, the ree observer. Coe part of the saowing area from
s, we found these shadowing,
r algorithm begspecified by thhadowing face
ane of the facetut are typically e perimeter. Th
ng distance and
d in MATLABmulation uses twte size, shape, mto investigate vbecome visibles also been useuch as cubes, ree learn more wto modify the
es (e.g. rectanguwe had these cthe new resultsion. We discus
ssary to have a specially poignoriginal photomork is discussed
EX SHAPES
urrent tool sumn. The reflecteeflective propermbining simpl
atellite onto anom the facet’s a
ere were a fewcalculate the a
gins by findinghe user for the tets” into the pla
t for which weunordered. Thhe shadowed f
d/or decreasing
B® by the Direwo line elemenmaterial, and avarious non-rese or illuminateed to investigatectangular para
with complex bsoftware.
ular parallelepcomplex bodies to the old andss this work in
tool with whicnant considerinmetric modelind in Section 3.
ms up the refleced light of courrties of the facele shapes into aother part. We
albedo-area pro
w specific, majoarea of the shad whether any ftime being. Thanes of the face
e’re calculatinghe Qhull algorifacet is split int
g satellite size.
ected Energy nts (TLEs) to attitude as well solvable space ed by the sun aste glints from allelepipeds, Nodies, or is it t
iped with s, we had to ad
d to see if this iSection 2.
ch we can test ng the potentialng tool to gene
cted light from rse depends onet, and the a more complee attempt to redoduct.
or portions needow, and subtrfacets which cahe sun unit vecet for which we
g the intensity.ithm is then appto a grid of man
as
s
N-too
dapt is a
l erate
n the
x duce
ded ract it an tor is e are
plied ny
small squaintersection
Out calculadimensionsbody modepanels of 1seen in Fig
2.2. Analy
We presensimulated. occurring aaxial spinnimplementeach time sresults for
In all our pdifferent licorrect behnon-shadowfew possib
The first pa27842 (841is a dawn psatellite waorientationof AEOS arise in periand the expnon-zero re
ares and we findns is summed a
F
ations were coms, a diffuse albel which had th1m×3m×0.05mgs. 3-5 at differ
sis and Results
nt three differen These passes
at orientations ner and a nadir-ted, followed bstep to determithe shadowing
passes aside froght curve from
havior qualitatiwing lightcurv
ble sources. Th
ass (Fig. 3, Eng1 km altitude, 9pass observed fas given a spinn with its spin aand the observeiodic shadowinperimental sateesiduals thus in
d the intersectiand multiplied
Fig. 2. Schema
mpleted with tbedo of 0.3, andhe control mod
m dimensions anrent orientation
s
nt passes of ourwere simulateof 9°, 45°, and-ram pointing s
by a pass with tine magnitude g version comp
om one (not shm that of the noively. These reves. We have nhese will be dis
gagement #1) w90.2º inclinatiofrom AEOS be
nning attitude aaxis toward theer begins to seeng. Interestinglellite are identindicating a diff
ion of the shadby the area of
atic flow for ca
two models, a cd no specular r
del dimensions nd with the samns.
r complex bodyd using parame
d 90° to the termstabilized bodythe shadowing residuals. The
pared to the non
own here), theon-shadowing cesiduals reach not yet determiscussed later.
we present is fon, RAAN of 8etween 1537-15along the axial e observer. Ase the lit and shly however, foical with zero rfference betwee
dow polygon wf each square in
alculating the in
control model teflection. Theas a main body
me albedo. Th
y which are jueters for the AEminator. For thy. We simulatecode impleme
e residuals woun-shadowing v
e shadowing, orcode. While wa maximum ofined where the
for the complex84.54º, and ecc553 UT which direction. As the satellite madowed side or most of the p
residual. Only en the light cur
with the grid of n the grid, givin
ntensity for a g
that was a parae second modely with the addi
he experimenta
st a sample of EOS telescopehe satellite attied a pass witho
ented, then comuld show if ourversion.
r complex-bodwe believe not qf 0.12 stellar msupposed erro
x body in an orcentricity of 0.0
crosses the terseen in Fig. 3,
moves through if the satellite, a
pass, the light cduring the last
rves.
the facet. Finang us the shado
given facet.
allelepiped withl was an experiition of two facl, complex bod
the total numbe on Mt. Haleakitude, we ran cout the shadow
mpared the magr code is produ
dy code does shquantitatively c
magnitudes of dor occurs, but c
rbit associated 0010). On Marrminator at a 9the satellite be
its orbit, it passaccounting forcurves of the cot third of the pa
ally, the numbeowed area.
h 1m×1m×3mimental, complce-perpendiculdy model can b
ber of passes wkala with passeases for both a
wing code gnitudes reportucing different
how a slightly correct, shows difference froman attribute it t
with SSN Objrch 28, 2009, t° angle. The
egins with an ses nearly overr the seeminglyontrolled satellass does one se
er of
lex lar be
e es an
ted for
the m the
to a
ect there
rhead y late lite ee
Fig. 3. Engagement #1. The top panel shows the simulated results of the photometric tool. The image of the globe includes the terminator, a sensor site indicated by the red plus sign, and the satellite pass in yellow moving from north to south. The complex body image is the orientation of the satellite as seen from the sensor site. The plot of intensity (I) versus time shows the overall intensity in white and individual facet intensities in blue. Finally, the bottom panel is a plot of residuals or difference between the complex body with shadowing and the complex body without shadowing.
The second pass (Fig. 4, Engagement #2) we present is for the complex body in an orbit associated with SSN Object 28773 (560 km altitude, 31.41º inclination, RAAN of 335.71º, and eccentricity of 0.0007). On February 5, 2007, there is a dusk pass observed from AEOS between 0430-0500 UT which crosses the terminator at a 90° angle. This satellite was also given an axial spinner attitude. Initially, the satellite begins the pass oriented with its spin axis toward the observer. The residuals in the first third of the light curve have a higher frequency than the actual rotation rate of the satellite, however the last two-thirds of the residual plot shows shadowing occurring at the rotation frequency of the satellite. Further analysis is required to understand the difference in the shadowing frequency.
Fig. 4. Engagement #2. Same format as Fig. 3.
The final pass (Fig. 5, Engagement #3) we present is for the complex body in an orbit associated with SSN Object 27844 (1171 km altitude, 42.2º inclination, RAAN of 83.55º, and eccentricity of 0.0011). On March 13, 2009, there was a dawn pass observed at AEOS between 1545-1558 UT which crosses the terminator at a 45° angle. Contrary to the previous cases, this satellite was in a nadir-ram stabilized attitude with its body x-axis pointing to the ram and its body z-axis pointing to nadir. For this engagement, the satellite begins the pass oriented with its ram axis nearly toward the observer. As the satellite moves through its orbit, the observer begins to see an increasing and systematic shadowing effect as indicated in the residual plot. One does not see any periodic shadowing due to satellite spin since the satellite is not spinning. Additionally, as the satellite passes the observer and across the terminator, the “solar panel” appendages appear to reduce the overall intensity from the side facets of the main body as one would expect.
Fig. 5. Engagement #3. Same format as Fig. 3.
We may draw three basic conclusions from this data shown above. First, the shadowing code appears to account for one facet shadowing another facet. Second, the shadowing effect appears consistent with the satellite attitude as seen by the marked differences in the residuals between the axial-spinner and nadir-ram pointing attitudes. Finally, we were able to “measure” the shadowing effect by comparing a complex body with shadowing to one without shadowing. However, when observing an actual satellite in orbit and measuring its time-varying photometric light curve, one must devise a way to determine whether the object is indeed a complex shape exhibiting shadowing, or a simple object with no shadowing.
3. SPACE-BASED SENSOR MODELING
3.1 Pass Prediction and Visualization
The photometric tool created by AFRL and modified as described above to accommodate complex shapes has one limitation. Currently, it can only model satellites as observed from fixed ground sites. Theoretically, this tool can model a sensor site at a fixed longitude and latitude, but at an altitude representative of a satellite orbit. Of course, in doing so, one does not even come close to modeling the effects of the sensor movement on the target’s photometric light curve. With future space-based sensors planned, we decided to modify the AFRL tool to model a satellite’s photometric light curve as measured by another orbiting satellite. Most of the tool’s functions and routines were still applicable, except that now we had to modify the code to accept orbit parameters for the sensor satellite and predict when the sensor satellite will be able to observe the target satellite under various constraints such as a sun-exclusion angle and no measurements against the hard earth background. The first step in the modification was to rewrite the pass prediction code. The current pass prediction algorithm takes two-line elements (TLEs) of the observing satellite and propagates them using SGP4. It then finds the TLEs of the target satellite and propagates it using the observing satellite’s coordinates as the “ground observer” coordinates. Once both orbits were propagated, we had to calculate all ephemeris points where the Earth and the sun
excluded thoriginal co Once the avisualizatioin Fig. 6. IEarth’s surwhile the tthan the tarwhile the psatellite orbreference. It isn’t unti
Fig. 6at a lothe satvector
The secondprojection the same oblue when when viewThe sensorbeginning the hard ea
he view of the ode, so no modi
accepted passeson of the geomIt is interactiverface for sky loarget satellite orget satellite. Tportion that is vbit. The globOne can see th
il the end of th
. Globe visualower altitude tatellite target is r is green and th
d visualization along with the
orbital data as inviewing is not
wing is not possr-to-target vectof the orbits, th
arth backgroun
target. The epification of thi
s were computemetry. The firste with the user ocation referencorbit is the red-That portion ofviewable is in ybe visualizationhat for most of
he orbit does th
lization of the arget satellite. yellow when
he Sun unit ve
method plots te vector pointinn Fig. 6 with tht possible and dsible and red wtor is green andhe satellite sen
nd.
phemeris wheres aspect was ne
ed, we needed t is a three-dimable to rotate tce. As seen in-yellow trace. f the target sateyellow. The sun also shows a f the target satehe hard-earth ba
viewing possib The orbital paviewing is posctors are orang
the orbital pathng from the senhe Earth locatedark blue when
when possible. d the Sun’s locnsor cannot view
e the target waecessary.
a way to visuamensional viewthe view to any
n Fig. 6, the satFor this case,
ellite orbit thatun unit vector igreen line from
ellite orbit, the ackground exc
bility (in RA-Dath of the satelssible and red wge arrows.
hs on a right asnsor to target aned in the centern possible, whiThe beginningation and excluw the target sa
as actually lit w
alize them. Thw from far awayy angle and theellite sensor’s the satellite se
t cannot be viewis indicated bym the satellite ssatellite sensorlusion restrict
Dec projectionllite sensor is dwhen it is not p
scension, declinnd the locationr. The orbital pile the orbital pg the orbits are usion area is ye
atellite due to th
was previously
here are two basy, the “globe” ve celestial spheorbit is indicatnsor was in a hwed by the sate
y the orange arrsensor to the tar can observe tthe viewing.
n) for a satellitedark blue. Thepossible. The
nation (RA-Den of sun excluspath of the satepath of the targ
indicated by thellow. One canhe restriction o
calculated by t
sic methods fovisualization shere projected toted by the bluehigher altitude ellite sensor is rows from the target satellite fothe target satell
e sensor lookine orbital path osensor-to-targ
ec) Mollweide ion. Fig. 7 sho
ellite sensor is get satellite is bhe green squarn see that at th
of viewing agai
the
or hown
o the e trace
orbit in red target
for lite.
ng of
get
ows light
black res. he inst
Fig. 7centerwhen when and th
We found percent of approximawanted to s
Once the bmodeling. bidirectionminimal chorbit, follocoordinate
3.2 Photom
Once the mproducing have a chacurves thatshow a disobserver bto the anglasymptotespasses for object with0.15, for a
All runs ofapproximaplots, one oshowed theangles. Thalso showepoints belo
7. Visualizatior. The orbital possible, whilpossible. The
he Sun’s locatio
the pass predicruntime depen
ately six hours. simulate differ
basic pass predi All that was r
nal reflectance hange to the BRowed by the tars.
metric Data fro
modifications tocorrect resultsracteristic diffet depend only otinct diffusive eing 90° to thee between a fas of 90° and 18each of three s
h albedo of 0.3total of 6 case
f the six cases aately 300 differof a cube with e defined lowehis feature is med intensities bow the lower bo
on of the viewpath of the sae the orbital pgreen squares
on and exclusio
ction to be the nding on other s
We added a frent satellite sh
iction functionequired was todistribution funRDF calculatiorget satellite’s o
m a Space-Bas
o the original s. Earlier resea
ferences [1]. Spon the shape ofcutoff angle at
e sun. For a tetace and an edge80° correspondshapes: cube, te, and separatels.
appeared to prorent passes for specular compr bound curves
more evident inrighter than thound curve wh
wing possibilityatellite sensor path of the targ
indicate the beon area is yello
most computatselected optionfeature to save hapes for the sa
nality was compo calculate the vnction (BRDF)on code. Howeorbit, using the
sed Sensor
software was carch has shownpecifically, it af the object andt 90° solar phatrahedron, the ce [3]. Cylinderding to the end etrahedron, andly with an analy
oduce phase aneach case, whi
ponent and the s which appearn the cube than e lower bound
hich we are cur
y in RA-Dec Mis light blue w
get satellite is eginning of theow.
tionally intensins. For examplthe pass inform
ame passes, thu
pleted, we movvector from the) calculation asever to do so, we ECI coordina
omplete, we ran that the phaseappears that evd not on its sizese angle correscutoff solar phrs have two lowcaps and cylin
d cylinder. Eacytical BRDF w
ngle-magnitudeich gave a veryother a purely
r to asymptotethe cylinder dcurve as expec
rrently investig
Mollweide prowhen viewing black when vie orbits. The s
ive part of the le, a pass predimation to a fileus saving time
ved on to modie sensor to the s the observatiowe had to first ates of the satel
an test cases to e angle-magnituery object has e or material psponding to the
hase angle is 54wer bound or mndrical sides, rech of these wer
with diffuse alb
e distributions y wide distribut
diffuse cylindto dimmer mag
data. The cube cted. There ar
gating.
ojection with tis not possible
iewing is not psensor-to-targe
code, typicallyiction for six m
e so that one caand obtaining
ification of thetarget and pas
on vector. Doipropagate the llite sensor as t
verify that theude distributiona distinct loweroperties. For e face of the cu4.7° (or minimum intenespectively. Wre also run as a
bedo of 0.3 and
as expected. Wtion of phase a
der are shown ingnitude at the cwhich had a sp
re however som
the Earth in the and dark blupossible and ret vector is gree
y taking 90-95 months took an then load it iresults faster.
e photometric s that into the ing so would rsatellite sensorthe observer
e modificationsn for various ser bound brightinstance, cube
ube visible to a) correspond
nsity curves witWe ran six mont
a purely diffused specular albed
We plotted angles. Two ofn Fig. 8. All correct phase pecular compo
me unexpected
he ue ed en
if one
equire r’s
s were hapes tness es an ding th ths of e do of
f these
onent data
Fig. 8The pcompo
In our testiobservationbased sensan orbitingin a stabilizdetermine higher conand attitudsatellites th
Modificatito be worklight curvebodies, finFor the spaon-target fometrics to
The authorand their oPerformanDetachmenResearch PMr. Joe Ko
1. Hall D.
. Phase angle-hase angle is onent on the cu
ing, we noticedn pass. This isor would. Add
g sensor sees mzed nadir-ram satellite shapes
nfidence one cades on each pashan a ground b
ons to an existking properly. es. For the shadding a method ace-based sensofor different cladefine these as
rs would like tooverall commence Computing nt 15, Air ForcProgram under oesters of the S
et. al., “Separa
-magnitude disthe x axis wh
ube compared t
d the orbital sens due to the satditionally, beca
many more targpointing attituds, the more pha
an have in the iss, an orbiting sbased sensor.
ting photometriThere is still hdowing modelto generally ca
or model, futurasses of orbits, spects.
o thank Dr. Donts, suggestionModernization
ce Research Labwhich much o
Sensors Directo
ating Attitude
stributions for ahile the magnitto the purely di
nsor has the inellite sensor mause of the widet satellite attitde. Since it apase angle coverdentification. sensor could po
4. CO
ic tool to allowhowever some a, future work wall the shadowre work includclassifying av
5. ACKNO
oyle Hall and Mns, and recommn Program Offiboratory for th
of this researchorate, Air Forc
6. R
and Shape Effe
a cube (left plotude is the y aiffuse cylinder
nherent propertymoving much fade geometry chtudes than a grppears that pharage one can oAdditionally, botentially allow
ONCLUSION
w for complex sanalysis requirwould include c
wing function, ades combining iailable coverag
OWLEDGEM
Mr. Paul Kervinmendations. Wfice, the Maui Hheir support to th was conductee Research Lab
REFERENCES
fects for Non-re
ot) and cylindeaxis. Notice thr.
y of a wider coaster and farthehanges inherentround-based sese angle-magn
obtain to discerbecause of the
w for quicker id
NS
satellite shapesred to fully undcreating more
and creating a git with the shadge for different
MENTS
n for the use ofe also thank th
High Performanthe U.S. Air Fod. Finally, thisboratory.
S
esolved Object
er (right plot) frhe structure fro
overage of phaser during a passt in the orbits pnsor, especiall
nitude distributirn the lower bo
wider coveragdentification o
s and a space-bderstand the simand different tygeneralized comdowing versiont classes of orb
f their photomehe Department nce Computingorce Academy s research was
ts,” The 2007 A
from 300 passeom the specula
se angles for evs than a groundpassing each oty when the tarions can be use
ound curve, thege of phase angf shape for unk
based sensor apmulated photomypes of compomposite body Gn, researching tbits, and develo
etric modeling of Defense Higg Center and Cadet Summefunded in part
AMOS Technic
es. ar
very d-ther, get is ed to
e gles known
ppear metric osite GUI. time-oping
tool gh
er t by
cal
Conference Proceedings, Kihei, HI, 2007.
2. Hall D., “Optical CubeSat Discrimination,” The 2008 AMOS Technical Conference Proceedings, Kihei, HI, 2008. 3. "Tetrahedron." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 26 Aug 2009, 21:44 UTC. 26 Aug 2009 <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tetrahedron&oldid=310245038>.