sims intellectual property hal r. varian. sims outline types of intellectual property –trademarks...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
224 views
TRANSCRIPT
SIMS
Intellectual Property
Hal R. Varian
SIMS
Outline
• Types of intellectual property– Trademarks– Trade secrets– Patents– Copyright
• Background + tech issues for each one
SIMS
Trademark• Trademark
– Identify a product or service – name, logo, etc.• Incentive to invest and maintain reputation• Legal issue: avoid consumer confusion
– Is there an attempt to confuse or mislead?
– Claim a trademark™ or register a trademark®
• Only applies within a particular line of business • E.g. Apple computer, Apple music, Continental Airlines, Continental
Tires, etc.
– Abandonment or genericide• Use it or lose it• Aspirin is generic in US, not Canada• Requirement to enforce: owners don’t want you to “xerox a copy”,
“photoshop a page”, “google someone”
SIMS
Trademark issues• Domain name system
– Cybersquatting: choose domain names that are trademarks: ATT.org, IBM.org. More TLDs.
– ICANN’s Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy
• Use of trademark terms in <meta>– Oppedahl & Larson v. Advanced Concepts– Playboy v Terri Welles
• Use of trademark in keyword adv– Geico v Google: Not infringing to sell keyword “GEICO”
to other advertisers– However, advertisers may not use trademark in
infringing way– Europe sees things differently…
SIMS
Trade secrets• Confidential method or process, which confers
economic benefit, is kept secret• Unlimited life but easy to lose, no requirement to
disclose as with patent– Someone else can file a patent on your trade secret and
you can be sued for infringement!
• Discovering trade secrets– Lawful methods (reverse engineering)
• But: anticircumvention legislation for DRM systems
– Unlawful methods• Espionage, theft, etc.
– Anti compete clauses for workers?
SIMS
Patents
• Exclusive right to an invention for a limited amount of time in exchange for disclosure– File for patents in particular jurisdiction– Gives you a “license to sue”
• Dimensions of a patent– Length – time of protection– Width – breadth of coverage– Height – standard of novelty
SIMS
Patent length
• Tradeoff– Monopoly price for k years– Then competitive price forever
• Social cost to consumers of delaying low price• Profit to producers creates incentive to innovate
– Optimal life of patent trades these two things off• It appears that 20 years isn’t unreasonable• In theory would like different years for different
industries, but this is difficult to implement
SIMS
Breadth of patent• Software patents
– Ideas cannot be patented– Mathematical formulas and algorithms cannot be
patented– But devices that use them can be patented– What’s the difference between implementing an
algorithm in hardware software? Hardware is just “frozen software”.
• Business process patents– Reverse auction– Rounding up when making change
SIMS
Standard of novelty
• Cannot be “obvious to someone skilled in the art”– But the person skilled in the art may be without a
shred of creativity…– Perception of reduced patent quality in recent
years– Particularly true in “software and process patents”
where record of prior art is minimal• Amazon’s patent on “one click purchase”
– Patent examiners are overworked and underpaid…
SIMS
Examples of granted patents
4,022,227: Method of concealing partial baldness
5,443,036: Method of exercising a cat
SIMS
Patent explosion
Source: Bronwyn Source: Bronwyn HallHall
SIMS
Explanations of 1986 patent explosion
• According to Hall (2004)…– 1982 creation of Court of Appeals for Fed
Circuit courts made patents more likely to be upheld
– 1985 TI sues Japanese semiconductor firms and wins
– 1986 Kodak-Polaroid decision on instant cameras: preliminary injunction to stop production + $1B judgment
SIMS
Patent arms race
• If competitor uses yo, you have to patent in order to countersue
• Leads to arms race in patents– Each side needs bargaining chips for
settlements and/or cross licensing– Like cold war missels
• The big danger is the outsider (“patent terrorist”) who has nothing to lose
SIMS
Patent thicket
• May need to search thousands of patents– Very difficult to find all the relevant patents– Very easy to infringe
• Holdup problem: search is a sunk cost– Once you do find patent holder, it may try to
extract extortionary terms– Easier just to counterarm yourself with defensive
patents
SIMS
Examples of outsiders• Submarine patents
– Deliberately draw out application process • Patent published long after application filed (Lemelson: 18-39 year
delay on machine vision patents)• Then demand license fees
– Now no longer possible due to 18 month publication requirement
• Patent trolls– Acquire portfolio which it never intends to put in production, but
looks for infringers from whom troll demands a license
• Research in Motion (Blackberry) v NTP, Inc. infringement case on wireless email– Perhaps $1 B in settlement + 9% royality
SIMS
Copyright
• Motivation for copyright is in US Constitution:– “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts,
by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries”
• Originally 14 year term to American authors + 14 year renewal– US did not sign international copyright treaties until
1891 – temptation to free ride on English literature was too strong
– What made the US sign in 1891? – Examples of developing countries
SIMS
Piracy and pcGDP
SIMS
Growing complexity• Copyright act of 1909
– More works of authorship such as• Mechanical reproductions, performance rights, print
rights, grand rights, etc.
– Extended term to 28 years + 28 years
• Further extensions– 1962: 47 years, 1978: 67 years, 1998: life of
author + 70 years, 95 years for works for hire. Is that really a “limited time”?
– Furthermore, extensions were applied retroactively!
SIMS
Economics of extension
• Value of the extra years is tiny– Only reason to do it was the retroactive
extension!– What was original intent of the authors of
the Constitution?
• Supreme Court decision on Eldred case– “small number” logic
SIMS
Other terms and conditions• Fair use – a defense against accusation of
infringement. Issues:1. the purpose and character of the use, including
whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
SIMS
Other issues• Doctrine of first sale
– Once you buy work, can do with it what you will• Libraries, used books
– Can be set aside by legislation: in US cannot rent CDs, but you can rent DVDs
• Home copying– Sony v Universal Studios, 1984– VCR had substantial non-infringing uses (e.g.,
time shifting)
SIMS
Tradeoffs• Allowing some copying…
– Makes work more valuable– But may reduce sales– I.e., increases price, reduces quantity sold– Want to find optimal point…
• Example– Academic journals and photocopying– News stories on the web
SIMS
Problems with copyright• No central registry, search costs are
high– Debate on this topic
• Very long lifetime– Counterbalanced by strong fair use?
• Impact of internet– Incidental copies– Thumbnails of photos: Kelly v Ariba Soft
SIMS
Google Library project
• Digitize books– Show snippets as a result of searches [next slide]– Opt out by publishers
• Assoc. of American Publishers filed law suit• Issues
– Copying for purpose of allowing people to find works
– Fair use (as with thumbnail images)– Transactions costs (opt out rather than opt in)– Hold up
SIMS