sigsand 2013

34
Descartes vs Heidegger: Ontological Perspectives in the Design of Learning Management Systems SIGSAND 2013 John S. Chapman [email protected] @chapmjs

Upload: john-chapman

Post on 04-Aug-2015

36 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sigsand 2013

Descartes vs Heidegger: Ontological Perspectives in the Design of Learning

Management Systems

SIGSAND 2013 John S. Chapman

[email protected] @chapmjs

Page 2: Sigsand 2013

Instruction, Learning, Technology, Design

Instructional Psychology & Technology

Page 3: Sigsand 2013
Page 4: Sigsand 2013

Grade Book Metaphor

Transmit Course Content Syllabus, Assigned reading

Grades

Page 5: Sigsand 2013

What would it be like?

Is there an alternative metaphor?

Page 6: Sigsand 2013
Page 7: Sigsand 2013

Descartes vs Heidegger: Ontological Perspectives in the Design of Learning

Management Systems

1. Cartesian Worldview 2. Heideggerian Worldview

3. Implications for LMS Design

Page 8: Sigsand 2013

Cartesian Worldview

Res extensa (extended substances) Res cogitans (thinking substances)

Page 9: Sigsand 2013

Cartesian Worldview

Representations Correspondence

Detachment

Page 10: Sigsand 2013

Cartesian Worldview

“Based on our mental representations of the external world we are able to formulate intentions and plans,

make decisions, and from these perform actions in the world.”

Riemer, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2013). Rethinking the place of the artefact in IS using Heidegger’s analysis of equipment. European Journal of Information Systems.

Page 11: Sigsand 2013

Theories about Relationships

Properties of material entities (LMS) And

Mental entities (beliefs, norms, intentions)

Page 12: Sigsand 2013

Form follows function

Shape of a building should be determined by its function

Page 13: Sigsand 2013

Technology Adoption

Match task requirements (mental entity) with

Technology features (material entity)

Riemer, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2013).

Page 14: Sigsand 2013

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_theater

Page 15: Sigsand 2013

Heideggerian Worldview

Page 16: Sigsand 2013

Hammering

"To the person doing the hammering, the hammer as such does not exist.“

Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Page 17: Sigsand 2013

Hammering

"As observers, we may talk about the hammer and reflect on its properties, but for the person engaged in … hammering, it does

not exist as an entity."

Page 18: Sigsand 2013

"[The hammer] is not present any more than are the tendons of the hammerer's arm.“

Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

Page 19: Sigsand 2013

Learning to Walk

"As I watch my year-old baby learn to walk and pick up objects, I may be tempted to say

that she is 'learning about gravity.‘”

Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

Page 20: Sigsand 2013

“But if I really want to deal with her ontology--with the world as it exists for her--there is no

such thing as gravity." Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

Page 21: Sigsand 2013

Typing

"As I [am typing], I am in the same situation as the hammerer. I think of words and they

appear on my screen."

Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

Page 22: Sigsand 2013

Typing

"There is a network of equipment that includes my arms and hands, a keyboard, and many complex devices that mediate between

it and a screen."

Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

Page 23: Sigsand 2013

Driving

“In driving a car, the control interaction is normally transparent. You do not think ‘How

far should I turn the steering wheel to go around that curve? In fact, you are not even aware (unless something intrudes) of using a

steering wheel.”

Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

Page 24: Sigsand 2013
Page 25: Sigsand 2013

You cannot avoid acting You cannot step back and reflect

The effects of actions cannot be predicted You do not have a stable representation of

the situation Every representation is an interpretation

Language is action (more than fact)

Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

Page 26: Sigsand 2013

Ontology: What kinds of entities exist in the world?

Heidegger: What are the kinds of ways that

entities can be in the world?

Page 27: Sigsand 2013

Heidegger’s Being and Time

The way of being for humans: Engagement in Practices (Dasein)

Page 28: Sigsand 2013

Heideggerian Worldview

"Objects and properties are not inherent in the world, but arise only in an event of breaking

down in which they become unready-to-hand.“

Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986).

Page 29: Sigsand 2013

Object Properties In-order-to

Towards-which

(task at hand)

For-which (of the

practice)

For-the-sake-of (social

identity)

Hammer Wooden

shank, metal head

To-put-nails-in

Joining wood

Building houses

To-be-a-carpenter

Word processor

Blank screen,

formatting tools

To-write-an-article

To submit to a journal

To publish research

To-be-an-academic

Page 30: Sigsand 2013

Cartesian LMS Design

Traditionally, research into LMS Design is “an object with designed properties (the IT

artifact) but at the same time it hides the particular nature of technology when it is in

fluent everyday use.”

Riemer, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2013).

Page 31: Sigsand 2013

Coupling

Hammer is coupled with the hand and arm.

Page 32: Sigsand 2013

LMS Coupling

Improve coupling between the learner the LMS and the practice of learning.

Page 33: Sigsand 2013

Heideggerian LMS Design

Research the “fluent,” “withdrawn” use of LMS

Riemer, K., & Johnston, R. B. (2013).

Page 34: Sigsand 2013

Thank you

John S. Chapman [email protected]

@chapmjs