short food chains and the rural development dynamic

14
Short food chain activities: some reflections and future directions for research Damian Maye Countryside and Community Research Institute, Gloucester ‘Food from here’ Conference, Coventry University

Upload: countryside-and-community-research-institute

Post on 14-Jun-2015

274 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Some reflections and future directions for research’ and arguements that we need to reposition short food chain activities beyond the ‘rural local’/value-added market-based model that they are more commonly associated with.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

Short food chain activities: some reflections and future directions

for researchDamian Maye

Countryside and Community Research Institute, Gloucester

‘Food from here’ Conference, Coventry University

3rd July 2013

Page 2: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

• The ‘quality turn’ (Ilbery & Kneafsey, 2000)• SFSCs: niche market; retain added value;

more direct connections with consumers• 3 types (Marsden et al., 2000): face-to-face;

spatially proximate; spatially extended• Protect rural places; the ‘rural local’ • CAP reforms; endogenous rural dev.

Page 3: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

• SFSCs = new agrarian model of rural dev.• The IMPACT study (Ploeg et al., 2000;

Marsden et al, 2002; Renting et al., 2003)• “The ability of quality products to secure premium

prices and so generate excess profits is a central plank of (this) market-led, value added model” (Goodman 2004: 8; emphasis added).

• Need to extend SFSC focus beyond the ‘rural local’ arena and the activities covered.

3

Page 4: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

Recent ‘food system shocks’

• Horsemeat scandal• Food price inflation• Food security = new food policy master

frame (Mooney and Hunt; 2009; Maye and Kirwan, 2013)

• Shocks redefine and revalue SFSCs concept?• Value-added model is too narrow?• Multiple transition pathways

4

Page 5: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

5

Landscape Pressures

MainstreamFood System

Bottom Up Innovations

Time

Scales of Transition

Adapted from Geels & Schott, 2007

Page 6: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

UK food security discourse: where are LFNs/SFSCs?

• ‘Official’ UK food security discourse• LFNs/SFSC activities are sidelined (Kirwan

and Maye, 2013)• Support is rhetorical• Sector-level aggregate data are missing• Sustainable fs is not achieved by expanding

LFNs/the SFSC niche

6

Page 7: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

Alternative transition pathways?

• This dismissive view of LFNs/SFSCs is a missed opportunity?

• Need to focus more on the micro-level and community needs

• Market-orientated SFSC model describes ‘first generation’ food relocalisation (Goodman et al., 2012)

• But mix of community-orientated projects7

Page 8: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

Local Food programme

• £60 million programme.

• Launched in 2007.

• Distributes funds to more than 500 food related projects, ranging from small grants of £2000 up to £500,000.

• Aim: to make locally grown food accessible and affordable to local communities.

• Ongoing evaluation from November 2009-March 2014. 8

Page 9: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

LF activity types funded:

9

Community food growing

Education & Learning

Allotments

School grounds

Sharing best practise / networking

Celebrating food cultures

Community supported agriculture

Catering

Community gardens

Food co-ops

City farms

Farmers markets

Redistribution of Food

Box schemes

Community land management

Composting

Social enterprise

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

155

115

59

56

19

16

15

14

14

11

9

9

6

3

3

2

1

Page 10: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

General observations

• LF supporting community-based projects• Mobilising SFSC concept at community scale• Activities extend beyond ‘rural local’ model• Many LF projects are not about food (i.e.

more than just the veg); pretext & vector for social agency (Kirwan et al., 2013)

• Many LF projects are urban/peri-urban.

10

Page 11: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

Civic food networks

• Introduced by Renting et al (2012) to examine new sources of c-p innovation.

• The role of civil society as a governance mechanism for agri-food networks has increased in significance.

• Changing relations between agri-food networks and urban-rural relations; often cities are the starting point.

11

Page 12: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

Short chain activities in urban and peri-urban contexts• SUPURBFOOD (www.supurbfood.eu)• Food policy now viewed as an urban issue• The city-region concept (see Jonas, 2012)• Three activities:

– Closing waste, water & nutrient cycles– Shortening food chains– Multi-functional land use

• Synergies & innovative policy frameworks12

Page 13: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

13

Page 14: Short food chains and the rural development dynamic

Conclusions

• LFNs/SFSCs and the ‘rural local’• Official fs policy has sidelined LFNs/SFSCs• Need to reassess/revalue the form these

networks take and where they take place• Social and community values; civic food

networks; peri-urban and urban contexts• Proactive forms of place-based governance

14