sharing benefits of transboundary waters through cooperation david grey the world bank international...
TRANSCRIPT
Sharing Benefits of Transboundary Waters through Cooperation
David Grey
The World Bank
International Conference on Freshwater Bonn, 2001
River basin management& boundaries
• Basins within nations with strong central government
• Basins within federal nations with strong state governments (transboundary waters)
• Basins shared by nations (international transboundary waters)
Legal complexityPolitical complexity
International transboundary waters
• Extent: 260 “river” basins shared by 2+ nations
• Culture: river/society, pride, sovereignty
• Jurisdiction: no entity unless negotiated
• Politics: ‘anarchy’ of international relations
• Principles: UN Convention foundation
• Tensions: longstanding, always, growing with demand, ‘water wars’….
‘New Geography of Conflict’
“Possible flashpoint for resource conflict”
“Water systems & aquifers• Jordan• Nile• Tigris – Euphrates• Amu Darya• Indus• Mountain Aquifer (W.
Bank/Israel)”
Overview
• What are the benefits of cooperation?
• How can these benefits be shared?
• Some lessons and conclusions
Benefits of International Waters Cooperation
The Challenges The Opportunities
Level 1:
Benefits to the river
Limited water resour. management: degraded watersheds, wetlands, biodiversity, & water quality.
Improved water quality, riverflow characteristics, soil conservation, biodiversity; a pre-requisite
Benefits of International Waters Cooperation
Sub-optimal water resources development
Improved hydropower & agricultural production, flood-drought management, environmental conservation & water quality
The Challenges The Opportunities
Level 2:
Benefits from the river
Level 1:
Benefits to the river
Limited water resour. management: degraded watersheds, wetlands, biodiversity, & water quality.
Improved water quality, riverflow characteristics, soil conservation, biodiversity; a pre-requisite
Benefits of International Waters Cooperation
Sub-optimal water resources development
Improved hydropower & agricultural production, flood-drought management, environmental conservation & water quality
The Challenges The Opportunities
Level 2:
Benefits from the river
Level 1:
Benefits to the river
Limited water resour. management: degraded watersheds, wetlands, biodiversity, & water quality.
Improved water quality, riverflow characteristics, soil conservation, biodiversity; a pre-requisite
Level 3:
Costs because of the river
Tense (+/-) regional relations & political economy impacts
Policy shift to cooperation & development, from dispute; from food & energy self-sufficiency to security; reduced conflict risk & military expenditure (+/-)
Benefits of International Waters Cooperation
Sub-optimal water resources development
Improved hydropower & agricultural production, flood-drought management, environmental conservation & water quality
The Challenges The Opportunities
Level 2:
Benefits from the river
Level 1:
Benefits to the river
Limited water resour. management: degraded watersheds, wetlands, biodiversity, & water quality.
Improved water quality, riverflow characteristics, soil conservation, biodiversity; a pre-requisite
Level 3:
Costs because of the river
Tense (+/-) regional relations & political economy impacts
Policy shift to cooperation & development, from dispute; from food & energy self-sufficiency to security; reduced conflict risk & military expenditure (+/-)
Level 4:
Benefits beyond the river
Regional fragmentation
Integration of regional infrastructure, markets & trade
Sharing the benefits
The Challenge• Optimal river development may give unacceptable
distribution of benefits• A mechanism for redistribution & compensation• ‘Fairness’ – subjective & situation specific• Potential benefits to be shared
– Water quantity/quality; water supply; hydropower; agricultural production; fisheries; transport; eco-tourism; trade….
• Political decisions
Sharing the benefits
Principles• Some international consensus on principles
– 1997 UN Convention on the Law of the Non-navigable Uses of International Watercourses (SADC Protocol, etc)
• “Equitable and reasonable utilization” • “No significant harm”• No consensus on prioritization
– UN Convention ‘vital human needs’
• No consensus on specific criteria
Sharing the benefitsPotential Criteria
• Physical factors: geography, hydrology, contribution to flow • Socioeconomic factors: total population, dependent
population, economic & social needs • Water Uses: existing & potential, efficiency of use• Alternative sources: availability & costs• Externalities: upstream & downstream• Conservation: impacts & efforts to preserve• Formulae: Equal (or proportionate) shares of flows or benefits
Sharing the benefits
Past practices • Compensation for lost benefits• Equal apportionment of flow to each riparian • Prioritization of uses • Payments for water • Absolute sovereignty of tributaries • Equal allocation of benefits, and • Relinquishing of prior uses
(after: Wolf)
Sharing the benefitsSome possible mechanisms
• Water sharing– (Re)assigning rights
• Payments for water – Payment for use rights, bilateral sale or water markets
• Payments for benefits – Compensation for lost benefits, payments to allow new uses
• Purchase agreements – power, agriculture, etc.– Agreed price can effect a transfer of benefits
• Financing & ownership arrangements– Agreed terms can effect a transfer of benefits
• Bundling broader benefits– Trade, transport….
Lessons in Benefit Sharing
• Importance of political PROCESS• Perception of fairness essential to sustain cooperation
on transboundary waters• Sharing benefits &/or water• Benefit bundles: the broader the better• Innovative benefit sharing mechanisms• Unique solutions
Process: the key lesson• Imperative of trust
– Build capacity to “level playing field”– Wide civil society engagement: basin “community of interest”– Share experiences “in the bus”
• Riparian ownership: ownership builds commitment– Self-financed institutional arrangements essential
• Riparian commitment – “Shared Vision”: recognizing “win-win”– Share benefits, not only water
• Inclusiveness & subsidiarity– Build basin-wide framework– Achieve early results through sub-basin action
Conclusions• No blueprints: from simple to very complex
• Process as important as product to achieve cooperation
• Twice as long & costly as planned - & then some
• From river cooperation to economic integration
• An instrument to support PROCESS? – sustainability & security (‘public goods’)
Share experiences ...