UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on

LaZk^]%�ienkZe�Zg]�\nemnkZe�oZen^l: A hZg][hhd�_hk�]^\blbhg&fZd^kl

Disclaimer: The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of

UNEP, the funders, contributory organisations or editors. The designations of material in

this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP,

the funders, or contributory organisations, editors or publishers concerning the legal status

of any country, territory, city area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its

frontiers or boundaries or the designation of its name, frontiers or boundaries. The

mention of a commercial entity or product in this publication does not imply endorsement

by UNEP.

+

and

ia

Shared, plural and cultural values of ecosystems:A handbook for decision-makers

,

r

alues off

o something diff

or eff

Preface

-

.

Contents3 5

. 6 1.1 .7

Box 1: The UK NEAFO......................................................................................................................................................8. 9

Box 2: Understanding the value of potential marine protected areas..............................................................11 Box 3: Deliberating on the future of Hastings........................................................................................................ 2

..... 3. 6

. 4. 7

6.1 .... 9 6.2

. 2 6.3

. 4 6.4 . 5 6.5 om diff . 7

6.6 . 8 . 41 .......... .. 3

7.1 .... . 37.2 . .. .. . 67.3 . 507.4 . .... . 5 7.5

. 6

/

ess diff

t adding up diff

his is because diff

y diff

y affc

ess diff

1 Introduction

0

e of clear diff

1.1 What this handbook will do

e being used in a diff

his is because diff

1

Box 1: UK NEAFO

Diffdiff

ombines diffor these diff

aff

2

business

eff

National government and its agencies

Local government

l

c

Policy analysts and consultancies

2 Why do shared, plural and cultural values matter?

ǮǮ ǮǮUnderstanding that shared values can often differ from aggregated

individual values is crucial in considering their

full impact

*)

research funders

Land managerse managers will also benefi

ff

y diff

NGOs and community and activist groups

**

Box 2: Understanding the value of potential marine protected areas

y diff

1+

Box 3: Deliberating on the future of Hastings

ange of diff

fi

tion of diffor diff

een diff

1,

y of diff

v

(Figure 2) en diff

Transcendental values

Cultural or societal values

Communal values

Group values

Deliberated values

3 What are shared, plural and cultural values?Other-regarding values

Value to society

, these diff

1-

Values

Value-concept

Indicators

Contextual

Transcen-dental

Provider

Individuals

Ad-hoc groups

Commu-nities

Society & culture

ProcessNon-delibe-rated

Delibe-rated

Scale

IndividualSocietal

Intention

Other-regarding

Self-regarding

Figure 2 The five dimensions and seven main types of shared values.

diff

1.

4 Overview of methods for assessing shared values

1/

Process:

Outcome:

Process:

Outcome:

able eff

Process:

c

Outcome:

of diff

Process:

Outcome:

able eff

11

diff

Process:

c

Outcome:

Process:

Outcome:

Process:

Outcome:

c

Process:

c

Outcome:

+)

eff

Process and outcome:

Process:

Outcome:

used eff

r

c

Process:

Outcome:

Outcome:

2+

Process:

Outcome:

Process:

Outcome:

Outcome:

Process:

2-

tion with diff

stakeholders eff

diff

een people with diff

5 Deliberation

•

tial decisions among diff•

have been overlooked.

2.

•

• metaplan

2/

timelines

• ranking

• prioritisation

• establishing a verdict

• willingness to pay

fair price

• multi-criteria (decision) analysisoss diff

•

ǮǮ ǮǮEstablishing a verdict

is a qualitative way ofappraising or choosing

a preferred option

•

20

w diff

c

(Table 1)

6 How to consider shared, plural and cultural values in decisions

r

21

Table 1. Methods and stages of the policy cycle.

22

6.1 Using existing datasets to identify shared values

or diff c

c

w

of

ailable in diff

ff

,)

t

t

Table 2.

,*

n

r

3+

6.2 Risk management for a potentially contested environmental policy on the drawing board

• Desk based cultural historical study• Media analysis• In-depth discussion groups

w diff

oach can be used eff

r

oach is useful and eff

3,

which diff

diff

ange of diff

ǮǮ

ǮǮ

Local media can be a useful source of data

3-

6.3 Social desirability of a policy programme maZm�fb`am�aZo^�lb`gbÛ\Zgmenvironmental impacts

• Social media analysis• Citizen’s jury

v

o

ǮǮ ǮǮ:�d^r�[^g^_bm�h_�\bmbs^gl �juries is that they can

incorporate a very wide range of values

3.

6.4 Management interventions related to land use change

• Analysis of published documents• In-depth discussion groups• Visualisations and scenarios• Participatory Mapping / Geographical

Information Systems (GIS)

ff

tal diff

i r

ting of such diff

diff

table eff

3/

diff

under diff

e subtle eff

io (eff

vide an eff

c

be as the use of diff

30

6.5 Comparing the wellbeingthat people derive fromdifferent potentialprotected areas

• Storytelling• Psychometric subjective wellbeing

indicators

t diff ff

s

r

of diff

, diff

diff

a

31

diff

ange of diff

-Eff

r osts of diff

r

of c

r

f

, a diff

-side eff

6.6 Project Appraisal• Deliberative Monetary Valuation (DMV) to

feed into Cost-Benefit Analysis• DMV as an alternative to Cost-Benefit

Analysis• Participatory Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA)

32

n

e

the winners and losers of diff

c

ǮǮǮǮ It is important that there bl�ln_Û\b^gm�hiihkmngbmr�mh�consider cultural, ethical and political dimensions,

Zg]�iZkmb\biZgml��transcendental values more

broadly

-)

t

r

a

c

eff

es diff

y diff

c

off

-*

e

r

t be off

off

t

off y aff

y be aff

• Participatory systems modelling (PSM)• Deliberative Monetary Valuation (DMV)

6.7 Payments for Ecosystem Services schemes

off

y diff

a

v

t will be aff

d

f

or diff

ǮǮǮǮ It is important to consider how socio-cultural,

economic, and cultural factors interact

4+

alue diff

t be off

o off

; the diff

o off

s off

e side eff

4,

w diff

diff

7 Methods case studies

7.1 Inner Forth: Linking participatory mapping and deliberative monetary valuation

r

w suff

ing diff

ǮǮǮǮ The IFLI project will… improve access, aesthetics,

interpretation, cultural heritage and skills.

4-

off

ǮǮǮǮIt is not really beautiful in the way that people usually

think...but I feel quite proud of this place.”

4.

e diff

4/

7.2 The value of potential UK marine protected areas

e diff

o diff

40

(Table 3)

Table 3. Subjective wellbeing question in the MPAs case study

41

r

c

cting diff

oss diff

e of diff

ell diff t diff

42

c

essed diff

off

.)

7.3 Hastings: Valuing the seain a broader societalcontext

ri

r

r

t

r

r

r tion eff

r

n

.*

a c

a

t

5+

(Table 4)

Table 4. Group key goals for Hastings used in MCA and DMV exercises.

City of Culture, Green Hastings, Greater City and Business as Usual

r

5,

or diff

of the diff

of diff

aff

ombined use of diff

5-

diff y of stakeholders aff

as eff

c

w

t diff t scales with diff

5.

7.4 The coast in the media

in diff

or diff

t

ed diff een diff

t diff

y diff

buff

c

, and the diff

ed with diffdiff

c

5/

7.5 Kinloch Rannoch, Forest Futures: Artisticengagement, interviews,deliberation and sociallearning to reveal hiddencultural values

e

n

, and eff

c

c

s e eff

t

ǮǮ�

50

) staff

c

y FC staff

s

ǮǮ:�\hee^\mbo^��pZed�Zg]�mZed��bg�ma^�_hk^lm�k^o^Ze^]�overt tensions, but also a sense of unacknowledged

common ground

51

c ǮǮǮǮ Much of the project

involved building bridges – both socially and

conceptually

52

In[ebla^]�bg�+)**%�ma^�GZmbhgZe�>\hlrlm^f�:ll^llf^gm�!G>:"�pZl�ma^�_bklm�\hfik^a^glbo^�ZgZerlbl�h_�ma^�lmZm^�h_�ma^�ND l�gZmnkZe�^gobkhgf^gm�bg�m^kfl�h_�ma^�[^g^_bml�bm�ikhob]^l�mh�lh\b^mr'�Mabl�aZg][hhd�bl�[Zl^]�hg�ma^�_bg]bg`l�h_�k^l^Zk\a�\hg]n\m^]�Zl�iZkm�h_�ma^�LaZk^]%�IenkZe�Zg]�<nemnkZe�OZen^l�phkd�iZ\dZ`^�h_�ma^�ND�G>:�?heehp&hg'�Ma^�ikhc^\m�pZl�\hg]n\m^]�[^mp^^g�+)*+&*-%�bgoheo^]�+*�k^l^Zk\a^kl�_khf�^e^o^g�]b__^k^gm�Ngbo^klbmb^l�Zg]�k^l^Zk\a�bglmbmnm^l�Zg]�pZl�e^]�[r�ma^�Ngbo^klbmr�h_�:[^k]^^g�Zg]�;bkfbg`aZf�<bmr�Ngbo^klbmr'�Mh�_bg]�hnm�fhk^�Z[hnm�ma^�k^l^Zk\a�maZm�mabl�aZg][hhd�bl�[Zl^]�nihg%�oblbm3ppp'ep^\'hk`'nd(laZk^]oZen^l'

Design by Anna Sutherland