share-based payments: fasb simplification initiative and ... · share-based payments. —transition...
TRANSCRIPT
Share-based payments: FASB simplification initiative and common challenges
August 15, 2016
American Gas AssociationAccounting Principles Committee
Agenda— ASU 2016-09 changes to current GAAP
— Practical expedients for non-public entities
— Effective date and transition
3
ASU 2016-09 summary
— FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting on March 31, 2016.
— Intended to reduce the ongoing cost and complexity of accounting for
share-based payments.
— Transition provisions for each issue is different.
— Some changes will increase volatility in reported earnings.
Improve and simplify
4
Excess tax benefits and deficiencies
— APIC pool is eliminated.
— Eliminate delay in recording
excess tax benefits to when
realized.
What’s changing?
— Volatility in reported earnings.
— Changes to diluted EPS under
the treasury stock method.
— Valuation allowances may negate
impact.
— Difficult judgments if need partial
valuation allowance.
— Similar changes for tax benefits
for ESOPs.
Observations
Transition -
- Prospective for tax benefits and deficiencies & EPS.
- Cumm Catch to BOY retained earnings for Prior unrecognized benefits.
5
Excess tax benefits exampleGrant Date
1/1/20x1
Exercise price: $40(equal to market price)
Fair value per share option: $25
Vesting: 1 year cliff
Tax rate: 40%
Exercise Activity
20x2
Fair value of shares: $100
Tax benefit realized - $24($100 - $40) * 40%
6
Journal entriesRecording excess tax benefits
20X1 Current GAAP ASU 2016-09
Dr. Compensation expense
Cr. APIC
25
25
25
25
Dr. DTA
Cr. Deferred tax benefit
10
10
10
10
7
Journal entries - continuedRecording excess tax benefits
20X2 Current GAAP ASU 2016-09
Dr. Cash
Cr. APIC
40
40
40
40
Dr. Deferred tax expense
Cr. DTA
10
10
10
10
Dr. Current taxes payable
Cr. APIC
24
14
24
-
Cr. Current tax expense 10 24
Net P&L Impact - $14
8
Diluted EPS exampleGrant Date
1/1/20x1
Share options: 100,000
Exercise price: $40(equal to market price)
Fair value per share option: $10
Vesting: 4 year cliff
Options expected to vest: 80,000 shares
Tax rate: 40%
Compensation cost: $800,000 over 4 years ($10 x 80,000 shares)
20x1 Activity
Forfeitures: 2,000 shares (Expected to be the same for next 2 years)
Average market price per share: $100
Net income: $2.0 million(Before recognition of compensation expense
related to the share option grant)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding at 12/31/x1: 200,000
9
Diluted EPS calculationFor the year ended December 31, 20x1
Current
GAAP
ASU
2016-09
Net income before SBP compensation expense $2,000,000 $2,000,000
Compensation expense related to SBP, net of income taxes
$800,000 ÷ 4 years × 60% (net of related tax effect of 40%) (120,000) (120,000)
Net Income 1,880,000 1,880,000
Weighted-average shares outstanding 200,000 200,000
Incremental Shares 30,925 50,725
Total weighted-average shares outstanding 230,925 250,725
Diluted EPS $8.14 $7.50
10
Incremental shares calculationCurrent GAAP ASU 2016-09
Shares assumed issued on exercise of options(100,000 options outstanding at beginning of year +
98,000 options outstanding at end of year) ÷ 2 99,000 99,000
Shares repurchased at average market priceTotal assumed proceeds ÷ $100 average price (68,075) (48,275)
Incremental shares 30,925 50,725
Assumed proceeds from exercise of options99,000 (average options outstanding) × $40 $3,960,000 $3,960,000
Average unrecognized compensation cost related to
future services for EPS purposes 867,500 867,500
Tax benefits credited to equity on assumed exercise
based on average market price less weighted-average
exercise price 1,980,000 0.0
Total assumed proceeds $6,807,500 $4,827,500
11
Excess tax benefit cash flow classification
— Requires an entity to present
excess tax benefits as an
operating activity.
What’s changing?
— Will result in increase in
operating cash flows.
— Eliminates need to separately
identify gross tax benefits.
Observations
Transition – prospective or retrospective transition method.
12
Forfeitures
— Estimate forfeitures (current
GAAP) or reverse
compensation cost of forfeited
awards when they occur.
— Does not apply to
modifications or business
combinations.
What’s changing?
— Entity-wide election for all
award types.
— Greater volatility if forfeitures
occur unevenly.
— May have known future
forfeitures that can’t be
eliminated yet (e.g. planned
layoff).
Observations
Transition – Cumm Catch to BOY retained earnings.
Applies to
‘service condition’
only.
13
Acquirer replacement awards
Forfeitures business combination example
— AC exchanges replacement awards that require one year of
postcombination service for awards of TC for which employees
had completed 4 of the 5 years of the requisite service period
before the business combination.
— The FV of both awards is $100 at the acquisition date.
— At the acquisition date, AC estimates that 10% of the replacement
awards will be forfeited.
14
Amount attributed to pre-combination service
Acquisition date fair value of award (ADFV) $100
Service provided to date 4 years
Total service required ÷ 5 years × 80%
80
Less estimated forfeitures in Year 5 (10%) (8)
$72
15
Forfeitures accounting policy comparison
Amount attributed to post-combination service
If forfeitures
are estimated
If forfeitures
are recognized
as they occur
ADFV $100 $100
Less estimated forfeitures (10) -
90 100
Less amount attributed to pre-combination service (72) (72)
Amount initially attributed to post-combination service $18 $28
16
Forfeitures comparison, continued— Assumptions for post-combination accounting
10% forfeiture estimate is accurate
Forfeitures occur in month 6 of Year 5
Amount attributed to post-combination service
If forfeitures
are estimated
If forfeitures are recognized as
they occur
Gross Forfeitures
Quarter 1 $4.5 $7 $ 0
Quarter 2 4.5 7 (5)
Quarter 3 4.5 4.5 0
Quarter 4 4.5 4.5 0
$18 $23 ($5)
$18
17
Tax withholding requirement
— Tax withholdings of up to the
maximum individual statutory
tax rate in the applicable
jurisdiction are permitted.
— Share withholding
disbursements are required to
be classified as a financing
activity on SOCF.
What’s changing?
— Allows companies to
determine a single rate for all
employees in a jurisdiction.
— May result in implementation
complexities.
— Policy choice currently,
predominant practice is
financing activity.
— Viewed as a substantive
treasury share repurchase.
Observations
Transition – Cumm Catch to BOY retained earnings and retrospective for
cash flows.
18
Practical expedients for nonpublic entities
— Entities can elect to use the
simplified method to
determine expected term.
— Permits a one-time policy
election to change from
measuring all liability-
classified awards at fair value
to intrinsic value.
What’s changing?
— Could be useful for nonpublic
entities that do not have
relevant historical data.
— Measurement change
provides another opportunity
for entities to make this policy
election.
Observations
Transition – Prospective for expected term, Cumm Catch to BOY retained
earnings for measurement change.
19
Practical expedient - expected termIs vesting only dependent on
a service condition?
Vesting is dependent upon satisfying a performance
condition
Is the performance condition probable of being achieved?
Estimate the expected term as the midpoint between the requisite service period and the
contractual term
Is the service period explicitly stated?
Estimate the expected term as the contractual term, if
the service period is implied
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Award contains a market condition practical expedient
does not applyNo
20
Effective date and transition
— Interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15,
2016.
Public entities
— Annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2017 and
interim periods in the following
year.
Other entities
— Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period.
However, entities must adopt the entire ASU in the same
period.
— If other than first quarter adoption, issues to be adopted
prospectively or by cumm catch are as of beginning of year.
21
Key points to remember! — Some of these changes are policy
elections.
— Consider how increased volatility in
reported earnings may affect the entities
you audit.
— Transition provisions for each issue is
different.
— Early adoption is permitted in any interim
or annual period. However, entities must
adopt the entire ASU in the same period.
— See Defining Issues 16-11.
Thank you