shape anisotropy and magnetization modulation in hexagonal cobalt nanowires
TRANSCRIPT
FULL
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200701010
PAPERShape Anisotropy and Magnetization Modulation in HexagonalCobalt Nanowires**
By Zuwei Liu, Pai-Chun Chang, Chia-Chi Chang, Evgeniy Galaktionov, Gerd Bergmann, and Jia G. Lu*
Ferromagnetic cobalt nanowires with high-crystalline quality are synthesized using a low-voltage electrodeposition method.
High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) results show that the nanowires are
uniform in size, and consist of predominantly hexagonal close-packed (hcp) structure with the magnetocrystalline easy axis
(c-axis) perpendicular to the wire axis. Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) measurements illustrate the
dominance of shape anisotropy, manifested by the weak temperature dependence of the enhanced coercive field along the wire
axis. Furthermore, the magnetic structures of individual, segmented, or intersected nanowires are studied using magnetic
force microscopy. This reveals a strong dipole at the two ends of the wire, together with a spatial magnetization modulation along
the wire. Based on theoretical modeling, such intrinsic modulation is attributed to magnetization frustration due to the
competition between the magnetocrystalline polarization along the easy axis and the shape anisotropy along the wire axis.
1. Introduction
Development of novel magnetic materials has played an
important role in modern day science and technology.
Nanomagnetism research sparks interests in fundamental
physics and renders promising technological applications.
Compared with bulk and thin film, nanowires with high aspect
ratio not only have the advantage of enhanced surface-
to-volume ratio but also possess favorable dipolar magnetic
properties. In addition, magnetic nanowires with good
conductivity are ideal for studying one-dimensional electron
spin dynamics[1–3] and magnetic domain-wall dynamics.[4–9]
Technologically, vertical magnetic nanowire arrays embedded
in an insulating matrix may serve as a high density patterned
perpendicular magnetic medium. This type of patterned
medium not only supersedes the storage capacity of conven-
tional longitudinal media, but also achieves superior signal-
to-noise ratio with reduced transition position jitter [10] as
compared to thin film perpendicular recording media. These
advantages make magnetic nanowires potential elements for
[*] Z. Liu, C.-C. Chang, G. Bergmann, J. G. LuDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles, CA90089-0484 (USA)E-mail: [email protected]
P.-C. ChangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles, CA90089-0484 (USA)
[**] Zuwei Liu and Pai-Chun Chang contributed equally to the manuscript.The authors are indebted to Dr. Tore Niermann and Dr. XiaoshengFang for HRTEM imaging, Dr. James O’Brien for SQUID measure-ment, Profs. Richard Thompson, Hans Bozler, Carsten Ronning, andMarkus Muenzenberg for helpful assistances. The work is supportedby NSF grants ECS 0729612 and DMR 0742225.
Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1573–1578 � 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag
high-performance memory storage. Furthermore, employing
magnetic nanostructures in integrated magneto-electronic
devices[11], biosensors,[12] and for in vivo cellular study [13]
holds great promise. Even though there have been many
investigations into magnetic nanowires, there is still much to be
explored and understood. In our research, one system we have
studied is cobalt, which has large magnetic moments and
effective magnetic interactions. This paper presents the
synthesis and material characterizations of Co nanowires
exhibiting a strong dipole with a magnetization modulation
along the longitudinal wire axis.
2. Synthetic Approach
The template-assisted electrodeposition method[14,15] has
proven to be a successful technique to synthesize vertically
aligned metallic nanowires. By controlling the deposition
conditions and the geometry of porous anodic aluminum oxide
(AAO) template, this method enables better stoichiometric
composition and geometric dimension of the as-grown
nanowires. Previous reports based on this method suffer from
poor filling rate due to the high deposition voltage[16,17]
required to overcome the oxide barrier layer. Since the
hydrogen evolution that originates from the reduction–
oxidation reaction easily blocks the AAO channels and thus
hinders the nanowire growth. In our experiment, we employ a
flip-chip process to remove the barrier layer before electro-
deposition, thus the deposition potential is lowered and
high-quality crystalline nanowires are obtained with filling
rate as high as 90% in the AAO template. (Detailed process is
described in the Experimental Section.)
GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 1573
FULLPAPER
Z. Liu et al. /Magnetization Modulation in Cobalt Nanowires
Figure 1. SEM images of Co nanowire arrays. a) Top view of Co nanowire embedded in AAOtemplate showing high filling rate. b) Without AAO template, bundles of Co nanowire stand alone onthe working electrode without support. Region enclosed the white circle indicates the exposedworking electrode posts.
1574
A top view of AAO template with Co nanowires embedded
in the pores is shown in Figure 1a. The average response of
such an ensemble array of Co nanowires has been stu-
died.[18–23] In order to characterize individual wires for better
understanding of their properties, the as-prepared template
with embedded Co nanowires is placed in NaOH solution to
remove the AAO matrix. Figure 1b shows bundles of Co
nanowires lie on the substrate after the removal of the matrix,
the bottom electrode can be clearly
observed in the form of dots because of
the electrode metal deposition into the
AAO pores.
Figure 2. a) XRD pattern of Co nanowire sample compared with hcp Co powder (PDF#05-0727) withthe strongest peak from (002). There are peaks contributed from Au and weaker ones from Ti thatexist in sample suspension. b) TEM image shows a Co nanowire with high aspect ratio and diameteraround 90 nm. c) HRTEM image exhibits the hcp crystal structure and the stacking direction along(01–10), where the 10-layer spacing is around 2.2 nm. d) Electron diffraction pattern shows thesingle-crystalline structure and corresponding growth direction (01–10).
3. Material Characterization
3.1. Structural Characterization
X-ray diffraction (XRD) results for Co
nanowires are shown in Figure 2a, which
matches with the hexagonal phase of
standard Co powder pattern (PDF#05-
0727). The strongest peak (002) indicates
that the most dominant plane is (001).
Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
(data not shown) shows that the nano-
wires are pure Co, without Au or Ti
impurities. Figure 2b is a transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) image dis-
playing a single Co nanowire having
diameter around 90 nm and length over
10 mm. By adjusting the deposition rate
during the growth, long-range single-
crystalline Co nanowires have been
achieved. Although some segmental
grains can be observed, the elongated
grain size is usually on the order of 10 mm.
To confirm further the crystalline struc-
ture, a high-resolution transmission elec-
www.afm-journal.de � 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
tron microscopy (HRTEM) image and
select-area electron diffraction (SAED)
pattern, shown in Figure 2c and d, reveal
the dominant hexagonal close-packed
(hcp) crystalline structure. They indicate
that the stacking direction is along [01–10]
with interplane distance around 0.22 nm,
and the c-axis [0001] (easy axis) is per-
pendicular to the wire axis. In addition, on
the surface of the wire, a thin oxide layer
of �3 nm was observed.
3.2. Electrical Transport
Measurements
Hcp Co is a typical ferromagnetic
metal. To characterize the electrical property, Au/Ti electro-
des are patterned using photolithography onto single Co
nanowires. Figure 3a shows a nanowire (length 12mm and
diameter 90 nm) with four metal contacts. Standard four-probe
resistivity measurements are performed. The linear voltage
versus current characteristics indicate that good Ohmic
contacts are achieved. As the current is applied on electrodes
Iþ and I� as labeled in the figure, the voltages on electrodes
Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1573–1578
FULLPAPER
Z. Liu et al. /Magnetization Modulation in Cobalt Nanowires
Figure 3. a) Microscope image of a nanowire and four lithography-patterned electrodes withequal spacing (�2 mm). b) Standard four-probe transport measurement shows Ohmic behaviorwith an estimated resistivity �50 mV � cm.
Vþ and V� are measured, yielding a resistance of 130V. Using
simple Drude model, the resistivity is estimated to be about
50mV � cm from the imaged nanowire geometry, and the
electron mean free path is around 1 nm based on the Fermi
energy EF¼ 0.81 Rydberg.[24] The resistivity is an order of
magnitude larger than the bulk value, and of the same order as
that of a 15 nm thickCo thin filmdeposited on SiO2 substrate.[25]
4. Magnetic Properties
4.1. Magnetic Hysteresis Response
Owing to the reduced dimension and elongated structure,
magnetic nanowires possess unique magnetic properties.
SQUID and magnetic force microscopy (MFM) have been
performed to investigate the magnetic structure of the
as-synthesized Co nanowires. As shown in Figure 4a, the
coercivity (Hc) measured in a magnetic field perpendicular
(transverse) to the wire axis is determined to be 15Oe,
comparable to the bulk value of �20Oe. The coercivity is
Figure 4. a) Hysteresis behavior of Co nanowire (NW) with magnetic field H parallel and perpenanowire at different temperatures illustrate the weak temperature dependence of coercivity.
Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1573–1578 � 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA,
found to increase with decreasing diameter
(data not shown). In contrast, when magnetic
field is applied parallel (longitudinal) to the
wire axis, Hc increases by two orders of
magnitude to 1.1 kOe. This enhanced long-
itudinalHc manifests that the wire axis is the
preferred overall magnetization direction.[26]
The shape anisotropy dominance has been
further validated from the temperature
dependence of the hysteresis response.
Unlike the bulk material, temperature has
shown to have little effect on the coercivity.
As plotted in Figure 4b, the coercivity
remains almost constant as the temperature
increases from 1.8K to room temperature.
This implies that the shape anisotropy
prevails over the magnetization fluctuation.
4.2. Spatial Magnetization Modulation
The magnetic structures of Co nanowires were studied using
the MFM technique (Veeco Dimension V). To conduct a
systematic study, all nanowires presented here are grown under
the same synthesis conditions and possess similar magnetic
properties. To determine the contribution from the cobalt
oxide layer, nanowires that go through oxidation process are
measured, and they give nomagnetic signal. Figure 5a shows an
atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of a straight wire that
has a length around 16mm and a diameter of 90 nm. The MFM
tip (field strength of �10Oe) has a magnetization vertical to
the nanowires lying horizontal on SiO2 substrate. Since the
MFM response is proportional to the second derivative of the
stray field of the sample at the tip position, the vertical
component of the field is mainly measured. To confirm that the
magnetic signals are intrinsic, measurements were performed
with a MFM tip magnetized subsequently in two opposite
polarization directions. The corresponding MFM images and
phase-change profiles are displayed in Figure 5b. In addition to
the strong dipoles at the two ends of the wire, this nanomagnet
ndicular to wire axis. b) Hysteresis responses of Co
Weinheim www.afm-journal.de 1575
FULLPAPER
Z. Liu et al. /Magnetization Modulation in Cobalt Nanowires
Figure 5. a) AFM image of a single nanowire with diameter of 90 nm andlength of 16mm. b) Detailed magnetic structure of single nanowire probedby a MFM tip with two opposite polarizations (top and bottom panels). Thecross-section phase-change profiles along the nanowire show quasiper-iodic modulation with identical period (T) around 700 nm. c) Schematicshowing the magnetization M (indicated by red arrows) modulates sinu-soidally along the wire axis.
Figure 6. a) Two sets of AFM and MFM images of one Co nanowirebefore and after sectioning by applying a voltage, showing a dipole at thesectioning points B and C. b) Phase profiles along the nanowire before andafter sectioning, indicating a similar modulation period T.
1576
exhibits finer dark–bright quasiperiodic magnetization mod-
ulations along the wire. The modulation period T is estimated
to be �700 nm. In contrast, by probing the nanowire with tip
polarized in the opposite orientation, the magnetic signal and
the phase profile are reversed, as demonstrated in the bottom
panel of Figure 5b, but maintain the same periodicity.
Furthermore, such spatial modulation persists after applying
an external field (�0.5 T) perpendicular to the wire axis.
From theoretical studies[18,26], this magnetization modula-
tion originates from the competition between the magneto-
crystalline polarization along the easy axis and the shape-
anisotropy energy along the wire axis. In a simple model, if
Co wire was an isotropic ferromagnet then the magnetization
M would align parallel to the wire axis. In the case when M
forms an angle u with the wire axis, the wire experiences a
shape demagnetization energy Ud (u)¼(U0/2)sin2u, where
U0¼m0M02V/2, M0 is the saturation magnetization, and V is
the volume. The alignment of the magnetization parallel to the
wire axis is favored as Ud¼ 0 for u¼ 0. However, since the
hcp-structured Co possesses a large crystalline anisotropy
energy in which the easy axis is perpendicular to the wire axis, a
magnetization along the wire axis, costs an energy of
Uca¼ k1þ k2, where k1¼ 0.34U0 and k2¼ 0.13U0 represent
www.afm-journal.de � 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH
Co anisotropy.[27] In [26], this problem is investigated
analytically. It is found, in the thin wire limit, that the angle
u between the magnetization and the wire axis is modulated
sinusoidally along the wire axis. Figure 5c depicts a schematic
of the magnetization modulation.
To investigate further the spatial modulation of magnetiza-
tion, a Co nanowire is imaged before and after sectioning into
separate segments. By applying 5V across a 5mm long Co
nanowire, the wire can be easily burned into two shorter
segments. Left panels in Figure 6a show themorphology before
and after sectioning.One can clearly see that the nanowire is cut in
the middle. By recording the phase change along the wire, the
corresponding MFM images (right panels in Fig. 6a) reveal a
pronounced pair of poles with opposite orientations (Fig. 6b) at
the cut points (labeled B and C).
& Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1573–1578
FULLPAPER
Z. Liu et al. /Magnetization Modulation in Cobalt Nanowires
Figure 7. a) AFM image of a shorter nanowire in contact with a longer Conanowire in the dashed circle. b) MFM image demonstrates the magne-tization alteration due to the interaction between the long and the shortnanowires. Inset shows induced transverse magnetic structure.
Such uniquemagnetizationmodulation is found to change in
the case of nanowires with kinks (data not shown), and when
two Co nanowires come in contact with each other, their
interaction induces magnetic structure variations. As shown in
the AFM topography image of Figure 7a, two Co nanowires
touch within the dashed circle. The correspondingMFM image
shown in Figure 7b presents the magnetic structure resulting
from the interaction between the long and the short wires. The
long wire here displays magnetic poles of same polarity at the
wire ends, in contrast to the dipoles of opposite polarity
observed on individual wires. The short wire acts as if it has
magnetically ‘‘cut’’ the long wire, so around their contact point a
head-to-head configuration prevails, as depicted by the dashed
white arrows. More interestingly, the interaction of the two
nanowires induces strong transverse magnetic structures in the
long wire below the contact point. It is illustrated by the
head-to-tail white arrows enlarged in the inset of Figure 7b. The
origin of this phenomenon can be attributed to that the short wire
pins the magnetic poles (across the wire width) at the contact
point, and the interaction is strong enough to form transverse
magnetic structures. This rich phenomenon needs future detailed
theoretical modeling to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
5. Conclusions
Hexagonal Co nanowires with diameter around 90 nm have
been synthesized using a low voltage electrodeposition method.
Structural characterizations indicate that the as-synthesized Co
nanowire mainly has an hcp single-crystalline structure with
easy axis perpendicular to the wire axis. The resistivity of the
nanowire is estimated to be 50 mV � cm. Investigating the
magnetic properties, SQUID data show strong shape aniso-
tropy manifested in the weak temperature dependence of the
Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1573–1578 � 2008 WILEY-VCH Verl
hysteresis responses for field along the wire axis. In addition,
fromMFM imaging the existence of distinct dipoles of opposite
polarity at the wire ends is observed as well as a spatial
magnetization modulation along the wire with a period around
700 nm. Such modulation is shown to originate from the
competition between the magnetocrystalline polarization
along the easy axis and the dominant shape anisotropy along
the wire axis.
6. Experimental
Highly ordered porous AAO templates are prepared by a two-stepanodization method. High purity aluminum chips (99.999%) are firstelectropolished in a mixture of perchloric acid (HClO4) and ethylalcohol (C2H5OH). The first anodization process is conducted in oxalicacid (H2C2O4) to form the first layer of aluminum oxide. In this step,the pores are not uniformly distributed. This first layer is then removedin a solution of phosphoric and chromic acid, leaving close-packedorifices on the Al chip surface. The second anodization is performedunder the same condition as the first anodization. Consequently,uniformly distributed pores with diameter around 90 nm and aninterpore distance of ca. 150 nm are formed in the AAO template.
For the flip-chip process, a thin Ti/Au bilayer is first coated on thetop side of AAOwith revealed pores, serving as the working electrode.The template is then flipped over and epoxy-bonded to a poly-vinylchloride plastic substrate and submerged into HgCl2 to removethe unwanted Al layer which is now on the top side. Afterwards, thealuminum oxide barrier layer is removed using an ion-millingpore-opening process.
The electrodeposition of Co nanowires is performed in thegalvanostat with CoSO4 electrolyte at room temperature. Theamplitude of the applied AC current is increased gradually to maintaina deposition potential at 1V for 3 h. This method enables a relativelyslow growth rate that improves the pore filling rate and wirecrystallinity.
Received: September 04, 2007Revised: February 20, 2008
[1] F. B. Mancoff, N. D. Rizzo, B. N. Engel, S. Tehrani, Nature 2005, 437,
393.
[2] M. Hayashi, L. Thomas, C. Rettner, X. Jiang, S. P. P. Parkin,
Europhys. Lett. 2007, 78, 67006.
[3] T. Ohgai, X. Hoffer, L. Gravier, J. E. Wegrowe, J. P. Ansermet,
Nanotechnology 2003, 14, 978.
[4] I. N. Krivorotov, N. C. Emley, J. C. Sankey, S. I. Kiselev, D. C. Ralph,
R. A. Buhrman, Science 2005, 307, 228.
[5] D. Ravelosona, S. Mangin, Y. Lemaho, J. A. Katine, B. D. Terris, E. E.
Fullerton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 186604.
[6] G. S. D. Beach, C. Nistor, C. Knutson, M. Tsoi, J. L. Erskine, Nat.
Mater. 2005, 4, 741.
[7] E. Y. Vedmedenko, A. Kubetzka, K. von Bergmann, O. Pietzsch, M.
Bode, J. Kirschner, H. P. Oepen, R. Wiesendanger, Phys. Rev. Lett.
2004, 92, 077207.
[8] N. Vernier, D.A. Allwood, D.Atkinson,M.D. Cooke, R. P. Cowburn,
Europhys. Lett. 2004, 65, 526.
[9] T. Ono, H. Miyajima, K. Shigeto, K. Mibu, N. Hosoito, T. Shinjo,
Science 1999, 284, 468.
ag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim www.afm-journal.de 1577
FULLPAPER
Z. Liu et al. /Magnetization Modulation in Cobalt Nanowires
1578
[10] H. Pozidis, W. Haberle, D. Wiesmann, U. Drechsler, M. Despont,
T. R. Albrecht, E. Eleftheriou, IEEE Trans.Magn. 2004, 40,
2531.
[11] D. A. Allwood, G. Xiong, C. C. Faulkner, D. Atkinson, D. Petit, R. P.
Cowburn, Science 2005, 309, 1688.
[12] D. H. Reich, M. Tanase, A. Hultgren, L. A. Bauer, C. S. Chen, G. J.
Meyer, J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 7275.
[13] A. Prina-Mello, Z. Diao, J. M. D. Coey, J. Nanobiotechnol 2006,
4, 9.
[14] V. Caffarena, J. L. Capitaneo, R. A. Simao, A. P. Guimaraes, Mater.
Res. 2006, 9, 205.
[15] A. Huczko, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 2000, 70, 365.
[16] M. Darques, A. Encinas, L. Vila, L. Piraux, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
2004, 37, 1411.
[17] M. Kroll, R. E. Benfield, J. C. Dore, D. Grandjean, G. Schmid, Eur.
Phys. J. D 2001, 678, 6.
[18] A. Fert, L. Piraux, J Magn Magn Mater 1999, 200, 338.
www.afm-journal.de � 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH
[19] T. M. Whitney, J. S. Jiang, P. C. Searson, C. L. Chien, Science 1993,
261, 1316.
[20] W. Wernsdorfer, B. Doudin, D. Mailly, K. Hasselbach, A. Benoit, J.
Meier, J.-P. Ansermet, B. Barbara, Phys.Rev.Lett. 1996, 77, 1873.
[21] L. Belliard, J. Miltat, A. Thiaville, S. Dubois, J. L. Duvail, L. Piraux, J
Magn Magn Mater 1998, 190, 1.
[22] Y. Henry, K. Ounadjela, L. Piraux, S. Dubois, J. M. George, J. L.
Duvail, Eur. Phys. J. B 2001, 20, 35.
[23] A. Encinas-Oropesa, M. Demand, L. Piraux, I. Huynen, U. Ebels,
Phys. Rev. B. Condes. Matter Mater. Phys. 2001, 63, 104415.
[24] N. I. Kulikovt, E. T. Kulatov, J. Phys. F; Met. Phys. 1982, 12, 2267.
[25] K. Yamada, W. E. Bailey, C. Fery, S. X. Wang, IEEE Trans.Magn.
1999, 35, 2979.
[26] G. Bergmann, J. G. Lu, Y. Tao, R. S. Thompson,Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77,
054415.
[27] R. C. O’Handley, Modern Magnetic Materials: Principles and Appli-
cations, Wiley-Interscience, New York 1999.
& Co. KGaA, Weinheim Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1573–1578