session 2

26
Session 2 Paperclips and Toasters: Critical Thinking in Psychology. Jamie Davies How many uses can you think of for a paper clip?

Upload: sasha

Post on 12-Jan-2016

22 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Session 2. Paperclips and Toasters: Critical Thinking in Psychology. How many uses can you think of for a paper clip?. Jamie Davies. Learning Outcomes. By the end of the session participants: Should be able to describe what critical thinking is. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Session 2

Session 2 Paperclips and Toasters: Critical Thinking in Psychology.

Jamie Davies

How many uses can you think

of for a paper clip?

Page 2: Session 2

Learning Outcomes

By the end of the session participants:

•Should be able to describe what critical thinking is.

•Have reflected on teaching critical thinking skills.

•Should be able to describe what goes into a toaster.

•Have discussed strategies to embed critical thinking skills into the curriculum.

Page 3: Session 2

Knowing a great deal is not the same as being smart;

intelligence is not information alone but also judgment, the

manner in which information is collected and used.

Carl Sagan

Page 4: Session 2

Critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally. It includes the ability to engage in reflective and independent thinking.

- Analysing arguments, claims, or evidence (Ennis, 1985; Facione, 1990; Halpern, 1998; Paul, 1992)

- Making inferences using inductive or deductive reasoning (Ennis, 1985; Facione, 1990; Paul, 1992; Willingham, 2007)

- Judging or evaluating (Case, 2005; Ennis, 1985; Facione, 1990; Lipman, 1988)

- Making decisions or solving problems (Ennis, 1985; Halpern, 1998; Willingham, 2007). 

(Lai, 2011)

Page 5: Session 2

Left to his own devices he

couldn’t build a toaster. He could just about make a sandwich and

that was it. Douglas Adams, Mostly Harmless, 1992

It takes an entire civilisation to build a toaster

Page 6: Session 2

What is critical (rational)

thinking in psychology?

Page 7: Session 2

“savvy consumers and producers of research”

(Sternberg, 1999).

Page 8: Session 2

Correlation not Causation

Page 9: Session 2
Page 10: Session 2
Page 11: Session 2
Page 12: Session 2
Page 13: Session 2

CT| Criticisms of Psychology

1. Is psychology only common sense?

2. Do psychological theories provide new insight into the human condition or do they document the obvious?

3. Does psychology simply formalise what any amateur already knows intuitively?

“Day after day social scientists go out into the world. Day after day they discover that people’s behavior is pretty much what you’d expect.”

Cullen Murphy, Editor, Atlantic Monthly (1990)

Page 14: Session 2

TASK

In pairs look at the conclusions from Lazarsfeld (1949) and suggest reasons for the findings of the study.

What could have led to his findings?

Do the conclusions make sense?

[5 minutes]

Page 15: Session 2

“Anything seems commonplace, once explained.” Dr. Watson to Sherlock Holmes

Hindsight Bias

1. “I knew it all along phenomena”– the tendency to perceive something as obvious or unavoidable, after learning of the outcome.

2. Study of Hindsight bias: Teigen (1986)• Evaluate actual proverbs and their opposites

Actual Proverb• Fear is stronger than love.• He that is fallen cannot help

him who is down.• Wise men make proverbs

and fools repeat them.

Opposite• Love is stronger than fear.• He that is fallen can help

him who is down.• Fools make proverbs and

wise men repeat them.

Page 16: Session 2

Discuss a CT class activity

How could you embed critical

thinking into your classroom

activities?

Page 17: Session 2

What is the quality of the evidence?

Could the relationship have happened by chance?Is there a control or comparison group?

Is the conclusion causal using correlational data?

Are there any confounding variables?

Are we over generalising based on an unrepresentative sample?

Are there any biases in the research or data collection methods?

Can you actually falsify the theory?

Is the study claiming to have found the answer?

Page 18: Session 2

“… science must begin with myths, and with the criticism of

myths; neither with the collection of observations, nor with the

invention of experiments, but with the critical discussion of

myths, and of magical techniques and practices.” 

Popper (1963) p66. 

Page 19: Session 2

The The Thinking Thinking Ladder.Ladder.

Charlotte Russellwww.resourcd.com

Page 20: Session 2

Developing opinions, judgements & decisions. Developing opinions, judgements & decisions. Critical thinking skills.Critical thinking skills.

Separating a whole an examining it’s Separating a whole an examining it’s component parts or features. component parts or features.

Using facts, rules, principles and applying them Using facts, rules, principles and applying them to examples or to solve a problem. to examples or to solve a problem.

Organisation and selection of facts, information Organisation and selection of facts, information and knowledge. and knowledge.

Combining or organising information to form a Combining or organising information to form a new whole or create something new. new whole or create something new.

Identification and recall of information. Also Identification and recall of information. Also known as Knowledge!known as Knowledge!

Page 21: Session 2

Thinking Ladder Tasks

Bloom-ing great!

Page 22: Session 2

Why do we study the WEIRDest people?

http://jamiedavies.co/weird

Page 23: Session 2
Page 24: Session 2
Page 25: Session 2

“Knowing a great deal is not the same as being smart; intelligence is not information alone but also

judgment, the manner in which information is collected and used.”

Carl Sagan

“savvy consumers and producers of research”

Sternberg

Page 26: Session 2

http://jamiedavies.co/nslc14@jamiedavies

Thank You