september 24, 2013 special meeting agenda packet

City Council Agenda of 2 September 24, 2013

NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING

AN AGENDA OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS 9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, September 24, 2013

McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room 500 Rio Concho Drive

San Angelo, TX 76903 THE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTH MAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE IS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, ROOM 210, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. every day for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting.

As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate” Thank You!

I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.)

A. Call to Order

B. Prayer and Pledge

II. REGULAR AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT 1. Consideration of approving an amendment to Vision Plan component of the San Angelo

Comprehensive Plan update adopted in 2009, specifically properties located within an approximately 1,800 foot radius of the intersection of Armstrong Street and 28th Street in north-central San Angelo (Presentation by Interim Senior Planner Jeff Hintz)

2. Consideration of approving an amendment to Vision Plan component of the San Angelo Comprehensive Plan update adopted in 2009, specifically properties located south from the intersection of Grand Canal Road and US Highway 277, south to the city limit line, and properties located just east of the city limits line, but outside the city limits in southern San Angelo (Presentation by Interim Senior Planner Jeff Hintz)

3. First Public Hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending Chapter 12 pertaining to Mobile Home Regulations of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 “PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT”, ARTICLE 12.500 “MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS”, OF THE SAN ANGELO CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE 12.500 TO READ, “MANUFACTURED HOME AND MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS”; RESTATING SECTION 12.503 “SKIRTING” BY ADDING MANUFACTURED HOMES AND PROVIDING AN EXCEPTION FOR LICENSED DEALERSHIPS AND RETAILERS; AMENDING SECTION 12.504 “TEMPORARY MOBILE HOME INSTALLATION” BY AMENDING THE SECTION TITLE TO “TEMPORARY MANUFACTURED HOME, MOBILE HOME OR BUILDING INSTALLATION”, AND RESTATING SUBPARAGRAPHS (a) AND (c) OF SAID SECTION TO REFERENCE MANUFACTURED HOME; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

City Council Agenda of 2 September 24, 2013

(Presentation by Interim Senior Planner Jeff Hintz) 4. Discussion and possible action on matters related to the fiscal year 2013-2014 budget to include:

a. Stormwater Fund b. Wastewater transfers c. General capital projects d. Other items as needed (Presentation by Budget Manager Morgan Chegwidden)

III. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

5. Announcements and consideration of Future Agenda Items The Regular City Council meeting on Tuesday, October 15, 2013, will be held at 5:30 P.M.

6. Adjournment

Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, Friday, September 20, 2013, at 5:00 P.M.

/s/________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

City of San Angelo Finance Department

Memo Date: September 17, 2013

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Morgan Chegwidden, Budget Manager

Subject: Agenda Item for September 24, 2013 Council Meeting

Contact: Morgan Chegwidden, Budget Manager, 653-6291

Caption: Regular Item

Discussion and possible action on matters related to the fiscal year 2013-2014 Budget to include:

a. Stormwater Fund;

b. Wastewater transfers;

c. General capital projects, and;

d. Other items as needed.

Summary: As requested last meeting:

a. Today’s discussion also serves to provide greater detail on the Stormwater fund as requested by Council. Detailed justification is attached for your reference.

b. Staff has presented options on changing the Wastewater PILOT transfer.

We continue to work with the City Attorney’s Office to draft a solution as requested by Council.

c. We will discuss opportunities to fund general capital projects. The budget

was adopted with a total of $1,756,529. Council further moved to allocate $316,000 to Fairmount Cemetery improvements. Each year $250,000 is set aside for Fire truck replacement. That leaves $1,190,529 remaining available for allocation to other general capital projects. Eligible projects include street reconstruction, storm water quantity improvements, Fort Concho rehabilitations, and 19th street sidewalks, etc. A complete list of projects eligible for consideration is located in the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan.

Fiscal Year 2014 Budget $1,756,529 Fairmount Cemetery (316,000) Fire truck (250,000) Remainder Available $1,190,529

d. And finally, staff can speak to other budget items the Council has need of

discussing at this meeting. These other items can include cell phone research, Workers Compensation Fund budget, Hotel Occupancy Tax allocations to Convention & Visitors Bureau and San Angelo Cultural Affairs Council, and other issues as needed.

History: Staff has discussed with Council during June, July, and August 2013 the budget priorities. On September 3, 2013 the City Council adopted the 2013-2014 budget ordinance. Financial Impact: None at this time. Related Vision Item (if applicable): Financial Vision. Other Information/Recommendation: N/A. Attachments: Stormwater Fund budget detailed justification; 2013-2018 Capital

Improvement Plan. Presentation: By Morgan Chegwidden Publication: None Reviewed by Director: Tina Bunnell, Finance Director, 657-4268

P R E P A R E D 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 B U D G E T P R E P A R A T I O N W O R K S H E E T P A G E 1

F O R F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 1 4 A C C O U N T I N G P E R I O D 1 1 / 2 0 1 3

2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F

2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &

A C C O U N T N U M B E R A C C O U N T D E S C R I P T I O N A C T U A L S O R I G B U D G E T B U D G E T Y T D A C T U A L S P R O P O S E D B U D 1 3 - 1 4 E N T R Y

F U N D 2 4 0 S T O R M W A T E R

R E V E N U E

2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 1 7 . 0 0 - 0 0 S T O R M W A T E R F E E 2 , 4 7 6 , 2 7 3 - 2 , 5 8 6 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 5 8 6 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 3 1 9 , 0 8 7 - 2 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 - 1 3 , 5 0 0 -

L E V E L T E X T T E X T A M T

0 4 0 5 S T O R M W A T E R F E E O N R E S I D E N T I A L A N D C O M M E R C I A L

C U S T O M E R S 2 , 5 8 6 , 5 0 0

I N C P E R S K - M T 4 - 1 7 - 1 3 1 3 , 5 0 0

2 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 6 1 . 1 0 - 0 0 I N T E R E S T O N I N V E S T M E N T S 1 , 3 5 6 - 0 0 2 , 6 8 6 - 3 , 0 0 0 - 3 , 0 0 0 -


0 4 0 5 P E R S K - M C 4 - 1 7 - 1 3 3 , 0 0 0

3 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 8 0 . 1 0 - 0 0 M I S C 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 8 0 . 6 0 - 0 0 D I S C O U N T S 1 8 - 0 0 4 0 - 0 0

2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 9 1 . 2 0 - 0 0 T R A N S F E R F R O M G E N E R A L 9 5 , 0 0 0 - 9 5 , 0 0 0 - 9 5 , 0 0 0 - 7 9 , 1 5 0 - 9 5 , 0 0 0 - 0


0 4 0 5 R E V E N U E R E C E I V E D F R O M G E N E R A L F U N D S F O R M O W I N G O F 9 5 , 0 0 0

R I G H T O F W A Y S A N D E A S E M E N T S N O T A S S O C I A T E D W I T H

S T O R M W A T E R

9 5 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 3 9 2 . 1 0 - 0 0 S A L E O F F I X E D A S S E T S 0 0 0 0 0 0

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

* R E V E N U E 2 , 5 7 2 , 6 4 7 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 4 0 0 , 9 6 3 - 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 - 1 6 , 5 0 0 -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

* * S T O R M W A T E R 2 , 5 7 2 , 6 4 7 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 4 0 0 , 9 6 3 - 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 - 1 6 , 5 0 0 -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

* * * S T O R M W A T E R 2 , 5 7 2 , 6 4 7 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 - 2 , 4 0 0 , 9 6 3 - 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 - 1 6 , 5 0 0 -



2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F

2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &



D E P T 5 8 S T O R M W A T E R

D I V 0 0 S T O R M W A T E R

E X P E N D I T U R E

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 1 0 F U L L - T I M E S A L 5 9 6 , 0 0 6 6 7 2 , 0 0 8 6 7 2 , 0 0 8 5 0 9 , 3 6 3 6 4 9 , 7 6 0 2 2 , 2 4 8 -


0 4 0 5 4 / 2 9 / 1 3 B E N C H M A R K - L B 6 4 9 , 4 6 7

* * * D O N O T C H A N G E A N Y T H I N G A B O V E T H I S L I N E * * *

C O R R E C T E D B E N C H 5 - 7 L B 5 5 6 -

5 / 2 3 / 1 3 L B I N C R E A S E T O B A L B G T A F T E R C O R R E C T I O N S 8 4 9

6 4 9 , 7 6 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 3 0 O V E R T I M E 3 , 6 7 6 6 , 0 0 0 6 , 0 0 0 3 , 5 2 8 6 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 O V E R T I M E E X P E N S E S 6 , 0 0 0

6 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 3 2 S I C K L E A V E B U Y B A C K 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 4 0 L E A V E P A Y O F F S 6 4 , 4 9 9 0 0 1 4 , 1 8 6 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 5 0 I N C E N T I V E P A Y 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 1 - 6 0 C A R A L L O W A N C E S 1 , 0 6 3 1 , 0 6 3 1 , 0 6 3 6 6 5 1 , 0 6 3 0


0 4 0 5 M O V E 2 5 % O F S T O R M W A T E R E N G I N E E R 1 , 0 6 3

1 , 0 6 3

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 1 0 G R O U P I N S U R A N C E 8 2 , 2 7 1 1 0 8 , 6 9 6 1 0 8 , 6 9 6 7 3 , 1 9 1 1 2 5 , 1 5 9 1 6 , 4 6 3


0 4 0 5 4 / 2 9 / 1 3 B E N C H M A R K - L B 1 2 5 , 1 5 9

* * * D O N O T C H A N G E A N Y T H I N G A B O V E T H I S L I N E * *

1 2 5 , 1 5 9

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 1 1 R E T I R E E I N S U R A N C E 8 , 9 3 8 0 0 1 0 , 7 2 6 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 2 0 F I C A 4 8 , 0 9 2 5 4 , 7 2 1 5 4 , 7 2 1 3 9 , 5 6 7 4 9 , 6 3 8 5 , 0 8 3 -


0 4 0 5 4 / 2 9 / 1 3 B E N C H M A R K - L B 4 9 , 6 8 1

* * * D O N O T C H A N G E A N Y T H I N G A B O V E T H I S L I N E * *

C O R R E C T E D B E N C H 5 - 7 - 1 3 L B 4 3 -

4 9 , 6 3 8

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 3 0 R E T I R E M E N T 1 2 0 , 4 8 3 1 3 5 , 4 0 5 1 3 5 , 4 0 5 9 9 , 6 4 7 1 1 8 , 8 1 2 1 6 , 5 9 3 -


0 4 0 5 4 / 2 9 / 1 3 B E N C H M A R K - L B 1 2 2 , 9 4 2


C O R R E C T E D B E N C H 5 - 7 - 1 3 L B 1 0 5 -

5 / 3 1 / 1 3 L B T M R S D E C R E A S E 4 , 0 2 5 -

1 1 8 , 8 1 2

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 5 0 U N E M P L O Y M E N T I N S U R A N C E 0 0 0 0 0 0



2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F

2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &






2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 2 - 6 0 W O R K E R S C O M P . I N S U R A N C E 3 2 , 6 9 1 3 4 , 2 6 6 3 4 , 2 6 6 3 0 , 7 7 3 3 8 , 8 2 7 4 , 5 6 1


0 4 0 5 4 / 2 9 / 1 3 B E N C H M A R K - L B 3 8 , 9 7 2


C O R R E C T E D B E N C H 5 - 7 - 1 3 L B 1 4 5 -

3 8 , 8 2 7

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 2 0 P R O F E S S I O N A L S E R V I C E S 9 5 , 8 2 0 9 2 , 9 7 2 1 1 4 , 1 0 0 7 6 , 4 0 2 1 1 4 , 1 0 0 2 1 , 1 2 8


0 4 0 5 U C R A C O N T R A C T 9 2 , 9 7 2

5 / 2 3 / 1 3 L B I N C R T O B A L A N C E B U D G E T 2 1 , 1 2 8

1 1 4 , 1 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 2 1 A U D I T I N G F E E S 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 3 2 S O F T W A R E M A I N T E N A N C E 4 , 4 9 3 3 , 5 0 0 5 , 5 0 0 5 , 4 5 0 3 , 5 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 E S R I - A R C E D I T O R L I C E N S E - S E C O N D A R Y / M A I N T A I N A N C E / 3 , 5 0 0

T E C H S U P P O R T ( G I S S T O R M W A T E R )

E S R I S P A T I A L A N A L Y S T E X T E N S I O N A N N U A L M A I N T E N A N C E

( G I S S T O R M W A T E R )

A U T O C A D A N N U A L M A I N T E N A N C E

3 , 5 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 3 3 C O M P U T E R M A I N T E N A N C E 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 M E M O R Y U P G R A D E , N E T W O R K C A B L E S , 1 , 0 0 0

1 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 4 0 T E C H N I C A L S E R V I C E S 1 1 , 2 7 8 2 0 , 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 5 , 6 6 3 2 0 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 L A B S A M P L E A N A L Y S I S A F T E R E A C H R A I N E V E N T 2 0 , 0 0 0

2 0 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 3 - 5 0 S P E C I A L S E R V I C E S 1 , 1 0 9 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 3 4 7 5 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 -


0 4 0 5 C O N T R A C T C L E A N I N G , C O N T R A C T T V I N S P E C T I O N , 1 0 , 0 0 0

E D U C A T I O N A N D S T O R M W A T E R P E R M I T F E E S

5 / 2 3 / 1 3 L B D E C R T O B A L B U D G E T 5 , 0 0 0 -

5 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 1 1 W A T E R / S E W E R U T I L I T I E S 5 , 3 4 6 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 6 , 6 7 2 1 0 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 W A T E R A N D S E W E R U T I L I T Y B I L L S , W A T E R B I L L S F O R 1 0 , 0 0 0



2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F

2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &






S W E E P E R W A T E R C O N S U M P T I O N

W A T E R F E E S F O R S W E E P E R W A S H D O W N S T A T I O N

1 0 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 1 3 E L E C T R I C I T Y 3 , 2 2 7 3 , 0 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 3 , 0 3 3 3 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 P A R T I A L P A Y M E N T O F E L E C T R I C I T Y P A Y M E N T 3 , 0 0 0

3 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 2 3 C U S T O D I A L 9 0 6 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 8 3 1 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 C U S T O D I A L S U P P L I E S F O R R E S T R O O M S A N D B U I L D I N G 1 , 0 0 0

M O P S , B R O O M S , C A N L I N E R S , P A P E R T O W E L S , T O I L E T T I S S U E

1 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 0 G E N E R A L M A I N T E N A N C E 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 1 B L D G . & G R O U N D S M A I N T . 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 2 E Q U I P M E N T M A I N T E N A N C E 4 9 9 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 3 5 7 1 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 H P P L O T T E R , O C E S C A N N E R , P R I N T E R , G P S U N I T , C O M P U T E R 1 , 0 0 0

P A R T S , A N D S E R V I C E S S P L I T B E T W E E N E N G I N E E R A N D

G I S A N A L Y S T

1 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 3 V E H I C L E M A I N T E N A N C E 8 2 , 3 6 2 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 7 6 , 1 3 7 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 S H O P C H A R G E S F O R 5 S W E E P E R S , 5 M O W I N G T R A C T O R S , 1 0 0 , 0 0 0

1 B A C K H O E , 2 E X M A R K M O W E R S , 2 1 2 Y A R D D U M P T R U C K ,

1 W H E E L L O A D E R , 1 S K I D S T E E R L O A D E R A N D T R A I L E R ,

1 E X M A R K T R A I L E R , 9 P I C K U P S , 1 B R U S H C H I P P E R ,

6 Y A R D D U M P T R U C K , 3 B A T W I N G S H R E D D E R S , 4 - 6 F T

S H R E D D E R S , 1 H E R B I C I D E S P R A Y U N I T , B O B C A T S H R E D D E R ,

1 P O N T O O N B O A T , 2 F L A T B O T T O M B O A T S

1 0 0 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 4 S T A T I O N A R Y E Q U I P . M A I N T . 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 3 5 S Y S T E M M A I N T E N A N C E 1 6 , 7 7 4 3 0 , 0 0 0 4 0 , 0 0 0 2 9 , 5 1 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 C O N C R E T E , R E B A R , P A T C H I N G M A T E R I A L , L I M E S T O N E , P A I N T 5 0 , 0 0 0

P V C P I P E , C O R R G A T E D P I P E , S T E E L P I P E , G R O U T

L U M B E R F O R F O R M S , S T O R M D R A I N G R A T E S , R I P R A P

E R O S I O N B L A N K E T S , E R O S I O N R O L L S , S T A P L E S

5 0 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 4 - 4 2 R E N T O F E Q U I P M E N T 2 , 8 7 2 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 4 , 2 2 4 1 0 , 0 0 0 0



2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F

2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &







0 4 0 5 R E N T A L O F S P E C I A L I Z E D E Q U I P M E N T S U C H A S G R A D A L L , 1 0 , 0 0 0

V A C - C O N F O R C O N T R A C T C L E A N I N G ,

K Y O C E R A C O L O R C O P I E R L E A S E

1 0 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 2 0 I N S U R A N C E - C A T A S T R O P H E 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 2 1 I N S U R A N C E - L I A B I L I T Y 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 3 0 C O M M U N I C A T I O N 2 , 8 1 0 4 , 0 0 0 4 , 0 0 0 1 , 8 6 1 4 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 V O I C E O V E R I P P H O N E S F O R S T O R M W A T E R S U P E R I N T E N D E N T 4 , 0 0 0

E N G I N E E R , G I S A N A L Y S T , S U P E R V I S O R A N D S W I N S P E C T O R

I N T E R N E T C O N N E C T I O N S E R V I C E

4 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 3 1 C E L L U L A R P H O N E 4 , 0 5 2 5 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 3 , 8 0 9 5 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 C E L L P H O N E C H A R G E S F O R S T O R M W A T E R S U P E R I N T E N D E N T , 5 , 0 0 0

E N G I N E E R , S W I N S P E C T O R A N D G I S A N A L Y S T

2 C R E W L E A D E R S

5 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 4 0 A D V E R T I S I N G 1 4 , 4 9 4 2 0 , 0 0 0 2 0 , 0 0 0 1 2 , 9 0 9 2 0 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 L A M A R B I L L B O A R D S , S T A N D A R D T I M E S , F A M I L Y M A G A Z I N E , 2 0 , 0 0 0

C O N E X I O N H I S P A N A ,

2 0 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 5 0 P R I N T I N G & C O P Y I N G 3 3 2 5 0 2 5 0 1 2 5 0 0


0 4 0 5 B U S I N E S S C A R D S , M A P P R O D U C T I O N C O S T S , K Y O C E R A 2 5 0

C O P I E S , P O S T E R S , B O O K M A R K S , B R O C H U R E S ,

O T H E R / D E S I G N

2 5 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 8 0 T R A V E L & L O D G I N G 7 , 3 6 1 7 , 5 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 1 , 9 2 3 7 , 5 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 T R A V E L E X P E N S E S F O R S T O R M W A T E R S U P E R I N T E N D E N T , C I T Y 7 , 5 0 0

E N G I N E E R , S T O R M W A T E R E N G I N E E R , A N D G I S A N A L Y S T , T O

A N N U A L E P A R E G I O N A L S T O R M W A T E R C O N F E R E N C E .

T R A V E L E X P E N S E S T O N A T I O N A L E S R I C O N F E R E N C E I N

S A N D I E G O F O K R G I S A N A L Y S T .

T R A V E L E X P E N S E S T O E S R I T R A I N I N G I N S A N A N T O N I O

F O R G I S A N A L Y S T



2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F

2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &






7 , 5 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 8 1 M I L E A G E 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 R E I M B U R S E M E N T F O R M I L E A G E T O G I S A N A L Y S T F O R F I E L D 1 , 0 0 0

W O R K , M I L E A G E T O A N D F R O M C O N F E R E N C E S A N D S C H O O L S

1 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 9 0 C O N V E N T I O N S & S C H O O L S 3 , 6 3 7 7 , 5 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 5 0 0 7 , 5 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 E S R I I N S T R U C T O R L E A D T R A I N I N G F E E S 7 , 5 0 0

A N N U A L E P A R E G I O N A L S T O R M W A T E R C O N F E R E N C E

R E G I S T R A T I O N C I T Y E N G I N E E R A N D S T O R M W A T E R E N G I N E E R

G I S A N A L Y S T , A N D S T O R M W A T E R S U P E R I N T E N D E N T

C O N T I N U I N G E D U C A T I O N T R A I N I N G F O R C O N T I N U I N G

E D U C A T I O N C R E D I T S F O R P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R

( S T O R M W A T E R E N G I N E E R )

C A R T I G R A P H U P D A T E S A N D M A I N T E N A N C E

W A T E R A N D W A S T E W A T E R C E U C O U R S E S

7 , 5 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 5 - 9 1 P R O F . D U E S & S U B S C R I P T I O N S 2 4 7 5 0 0 5 0 0 7 5 5 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R L I C E N S E Y E A R L Y R E N E W A L 5 0 0

W A T E R A N D W A S T E W A T E R L I C E N S E R E N E W A L F O R

S T O R M W A T E R S U P E R I N T E N D E N T

5 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 0 O F F I C E S U P P L I E S 1 , 6 6 5 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 8 4 2 2 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 P E N S , N O T E P A D S , F O L D E R S , P A P E R C L I P S , F O A M B O A R D , 2 , 0 0 0

C U T T E R S , C O P Y P A P E R F O R K Y O C E R A , N O T E B O O K S ,

T A B L E T S .

2 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 1 F O R M S 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 2 M I N O R A P P A R A T U S & T O O L S 2 7 , 8 2 3 3 0 , 0 0 0 1 3 , 0 0 0 4 , 7 3 6 2 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 -


0 4 0 5 W E E D E A T E R S , S H O V E L S , 3 0 , 0 0 0

C H A I N S A W S , P O L E S A W S , R A K E S , B R O O M S , W A T E R C A N S ,

F U E L C A N S , C H A I N S ,

5 / 2 3 / 1 3 L B D E C R T O B A L B U D G E T 1 0 , 0 0 0 -

2 0 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 3 U N I F O R M S 1 , 5 6 7 6 , 5 0 0 6 , 5 0 0 3 , 2 4 3 6 , 5 0 0 0



2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F

2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &







0 4 0 5 U N I F O R M S F O R 2 1 S T O R M W A T E R E M P L O Y E E S 6 , 5 0 0

6 , 5 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 4 P O S T A G E & S H I P P I N G 5 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 5 1 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 E D U C A T I O N M A I L O U T S 1 0 0

1 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 6 G E N E R A L S U P P L I E S 4 , 9 7 5 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 , 1 8 4 5 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 S U R V E Y S T A K E S , F L A G G I N G , K E Y S , W E E D E A T E R H E A D S 5 , 0 0 0

W E E D E A T E R S T R I N G , R A G S , C H A I N S A W C H A I N S

R E P A I R S O N L A W N E Q U I P M E N T

5 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 7 C O M P U T E R S U P P L I E S 1 5 5 2 , 5 0 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 -


0 4 0 5 P L O T T E R C A R T R I D G E / P R I N T H E A D S , P L O T T E R I N K J E T B O N D 1 , 0 0 0

R O L L P A P E R , P L O T T E R P H O T O G R A P H I C R O L L P A P E R ,

K Y O C E R A T O N E R

1 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 1 8 S A F E T Y S U P P L I E S 9 , 8 4 4 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 4 , 0 9 9 1 0 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 C O N E S , B A R R E L S , H A R D H A T S , R U B B E R B O O T S , S A F E T Y 1 0 , 0 0 0

G L A S S E S , R U B B E R G L O V E S , L E A T H E R G L O V E S

1 0 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 2 6 G A S O L I N E 1 0 1 , 6 2 4 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 7 5 , 5 6 3 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 0


0 4 0 5 F U E L F O R F L E E T 1 0 0 , 0 0 0

1 0 0 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 6 - 5 0 C H E M I C A L & M E D I C A L 4 , 6 7 7 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 6 7 5 , 0 0 0 5 , 0 0 0 -


0 4 0 5 H E R B I C I D E 1 0 , 0 0 0

5 / 2 3 / 1 3 L B D E C R T O B A L A N C E B U D G E T 5 , 0 0 0 -

5 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 8 - 3 1 B I L L I N G C H A R G E 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 8 - 6 0 F R A N C H I S E F E E 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 4 3 9 . 0 8 - 9 0 A D M I N S E R V I C E S T R A N S F E R 0 1 3 2 , 6 3 6 1 3 2 , 6 3 6 1 1 0 , 5 3 0 1 3 2 , 6 3 6 0



2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 I N C / ( D E C ) O F

2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 R E V I S E D 2 0 1 2 - 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 - 1 4 1 2 - 1 3 O R I G &







0 4 0 5 I N D I R E C T C O S T - T R X F R T O G E N E R A L F U N D F O R S V C S 1 3 2 , 6 3 6

P R O V I D E D P E R I N D I R E C T C O S T P L A N - M T 8 - 3 - 1 2

1 3 2 , 6 3 6

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 2 0 B U I L D I N G S 2 8 , 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 3 0 I M P R O V E M E N T S N O T B L D G . 7 0 , 2 7 9 7 1 1 , 8 5 1 9 5 0 , 7 2 3 0 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 2 1 1 , 8 5 1 -


0 4 0 5 R E D A R R O Y O T R A I L C O N T R I B U T I O N 5 0 0 , 0 0 0

5 0 0 , 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 4 1 M A C H I N E R Y 1 9 8 , 9 7 7 2 6 0 , 5 3 2 5 3 2 0 2 6 8 , 8 0 0 8 , 2 6 8


0 4 0 5 M A C H I N E R Y R E P L A C E M E N T F U N D S 2 6 8 , 8 0 0

2 6 8 , 8 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 4 2 V E H I C L E S 1 1 6 , 5 3 3 7 0 , 0 0 0 7 0 , 0 0 0 5 1 , 3 7 8 8 1 , 5 0 0 1 1 , 5 0 0


0 4 0 5 P I C K U P R E P L A C E M E N T F U N D S 8 1 , 5 0 0

8 1 , 5 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 4 4 T E C H N O L O G Y C A P I T A L 6 , 9 9 2 0 2 , 5 0 0 1 , 5 0 0 0 0

2 4 0 - 5 8 0 0 - 8 0 0 . 0 7 - 5 0 C O N T I N G E N C I E S 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 , 8 5 5 2 1 1 , 8 5 5


0 4 0 5 M A C H I N E R Y A N D V E H I C L E R E P L A C E M E N T F U N D 2 0 7 , 8 3 0

I N C R E A S E T O B A L A N C E B U D G E T - M C 8 - 9 - 1 3 4 , 0 2 5

2 1 1 , 8 5 5

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

* E X P E N D I T U R E 1 , 7 8 8 , 7 3 5 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 1 , 2 6 4 , 8 8 4 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 1 6 , 5 0 0

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

* * S T O R M W A T E R 1 , 7 8 8 , 7 3 5 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 1 , 2 6 4 , 8 8 4 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 1 6 , 5 0 0

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

* * * S T O R M W A T E R 1 , 7 8 8 , 7 3 5 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 2 , 6 8 1 , 5 0 0 1 , 2 6 4 , 8 8 4 2 , 6 9 8 , 0 0 0 1 6 , 5 0 0

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

* * * * S T O R M W A T E R 7 8 3 , 9 1 2 - 0 0 1 , 1 3 6 , 0 7 9 - 0 0

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7 8 3 , 9 1 2 - 0 0 1 , 1 3 6 , 0 7 9 - 0 0

City of San Angelo

Memo

Meeting Date: September 17, 2013

To: City Council members

From: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner

Subject: Vision Plan - Proposed Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for

the following area of the City:

Location: Properties located within an approximately 1,800 foot radius of the

intersection of Armstrong Street and 28th Street in north-central San Angelo. Please see attached maps in this report for a more graphic depiction of this area.

Purpose: Approval of this request will change the Vision Plan Map of the area

Contacts: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner -and- 657-4210

AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services

Caption: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO VISION PLAN COMPONENT

OF THE SAN ANGELO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ADOPTED IN 2009, SPECIFICALLY PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN AN APPROXIMATELY 1,800 FOOT RADIUS OF THE INTERSECTION OF ARMSTRONG STREET AND 28TH STREET IN NORTH-CENTRAL SAN ANGELO.

Summary: The City Council may:

Approve the proposed Vision Plan map amendments as presented; Remand the Vision Plan map back to Planning Commission for further discussion; or Deny the proposed Vision Plan Map Amendment in its entirety or on a property by property basis; or Make Changes deemed necessary and approve the request.

Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed Vision

Plan Map Amendment. Planning Commission recommend approval of this request by a vote of 5-0 at the August 19, 2013 meeting.

History and Background:

Mr. Art De La Pena approached staff about a zone change to a commercial usage in April of 2013 on a property he owns in this area. After discussion with staff and further elaboration into the business type that was proposed, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would need to take place before this request for commercial usage could be finalized. This request was brought to the Planning Commission on May 20th and the Planning Commission directed staff to re-examine the Comprehensive Plan's Vision Plan map in this area, and study the area to bring back a report and any recommended changes at a future meeting.

Analysis:

The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.

Generally speaking, the predominant land use of this area if one was forced to pick one word and summarize it would be residential. The overwhelming majority of this study area (95% of the parcels studied) were existing or currently zoned for residential development. That being said, staff is aware of the commercial presence in the area consisting of TX DOT, KLST & KSAN, as well as an auto repair shop (that is currently under construction), Vision Oil Tools (currently under construction), and the municipal water district office in this area. Many of these uses have existed for decades, but the major changes to the area are south of 28th Street and on the west side of Armstrong Street. in 2012, the Planning Commission heard a request for zone change that allowed the present construction of the auto repair shop in this area. Recently the site of Vision Oil Tools transitioned from an outdoor storage facility of vehicles, to that of a warehouse and office. This area has infrastructure present and is currently is overwhelmingly residential in nature. In looking at the Census Data for this area from 2010, this area is home to approximately 300-350 people at this current time; this is not exact, but it staff's best guess based upon the Census data gathered and remaining properties not included in the Census data. The data presented accounts for most of this area rather well, but there are areas included in staff's study area that do not match a Census Tract or Block. This is generally avoided whenever possible, so the data can be as accurate as possible; in this case it was not able to be avoided and the tract with the missing blocks (see attached map) stretches east to the Paulann area. As such it was not included in order to keep the data as accurate to this area as possible. The exact number of population for the blocks highlighted is 283 people at the time the Census information was collected in late 2009 and early 2010.

At this time there were slightly more males than females; with a one exception (see the median age for Block 5006), the median ages for this study area are in the early 30's to early 50's. This grouping of people occupied 103 housing units, 80 of which the owner resided in and 23 which were rented out. The average household size for those units that were rented and those units that were owner occupied varied slightly, but the overall average for all the tracts was right around 3 persons per household. When looking at the age distribution and family distribution (knowing the average household is right around 3 people), this is very important to consider when making future land use decisions for this particular area. This tells one examining the numbers that the majority of this population are of working age and live in a family situation; 85% (240/283) of people identified their living situation as a family household at the time of the Census. When looking at the age of the existing population who are presently referred to as children or young adults, the majority of this group will be of working or post secondary education age (assumed to be 15-18 for this purpose) over the next decade. This means, this area will transition from more of a family environment, with children playing and a bit more noise to that of a quieter area in the coming decade. As children leave the house and venture out on their own, the needs and desires of the area will change. As adults with children reach retirement age, some may have more money since they are assumed in many cases, to no longer be supporting their offspring. In moving forward, alternative living options for current residents will likely become an issue for this area as yard maintenance and other home ownership responsibilities may become more of a problem in the future. As such, proper opportunities for a retirement center or assisted living facilities may become a desirable outcome in the future. Without them, many people could be forced to relocate from the neighborhood where they have lived for many years due to a lack of housing choices in an appropriate scale and location within the neighborhood. Now that there is a little bit of understanding about the existing population and area, staff can begin to address the current Vision Plan Map and any changes that need to be made to it. This area currently has a good network of collector, arterial, and local streets to handle traffic circulation both now and in the future for this residential development. Caution needs to be exercised when adding new commercial development so that it is focused at nodes to create centers of activity. Not only is clustering of commercial enterprises and higher density residential land uses consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, but it keeps existing neighborhoods of single family nature at this time quiet and isolated. Additionally, it keeps these traffic generating uses at major intersections where traffic can be handled and dispersed adequately, away from quiet residential neighborhoods. By keeping commercial uses at busier corners or nodes, and introducing appropriate buffers into the neighborhoods mixes of land uses can occur that promote appropriately scaled developed and isolation of neighborhoods at the same time. Long strips of commercial development along major corridors and four lane roads may seem popular in the short term, but are not sustainable or conducive to redevelopment in the long term. Chadbourne Street is a prime example of this; a commercial strip of zoning was designated in the 1950's and introduced zoning that was not of an appropriate intensity or scale to the surrounding neighborhoods. As a result, many of these neighborhoods now see dilapidated buildings, lowered property values, and less interest to develop and/or redevelop properties. Commercial and neighborhood

development can be compatible with one another when appropriate scale and intensity are observed through planning efforts. That being said, the red on the vision map indicates commercial type development and would also include the most intense land uses this area would see. Another key component of this proposed Vision Plan Map is the buffering of the neighborhoods from commercial usage with lower intensity Neighborhood Centers (in pink) intended for neighborhood scale commercial development and higher density residential development. This higher intensity residential development could come in the form of townhomes, duplexes, multi-family dwellings, twin homes, retirement centers, or assisted living facilities to name a few of the housing choices. Back to our population who will be nearing retirement age in the next 20-25 years (some sooner); these folks probably like the neighborhood they live in and in some cases will not be able to maintain and keep up with a traditional yard and single-family house; others may be able to, but simply will not want to any longer. Now is the time to plan for this before it is too late. Higher density residential development is of an appropriately scaled density to work as a buffer from the single family residences present in this area into the commercial uses and busier roadways. This type of buffer is only a suggestion, but would be one that would work rather well in the Neighborhood Center or Transitional (in brown) envisioned areas. Currently, there are Heavy Commercial and General Commercial Zoning Districts abutting directly to Single-Family Residentially Zoned properties. At the time being, this has worked in some cases, but in the past outdoor storage of unlimited quantity was separated from these residences with only a privacy fence as a buffer. A privacy fence is a PART of a buffering strategy, but is certainly not the entire buffer. A strategy of uses and zoning districts working together will promote protection of property values and keep neighborhoods isolated and quiet, which is exactly what they have been intended for. The Transitional envisioned areas have been located around the areas where the highest intensity uses would conceivably be allowed through this proposed amendment (bear in mind, no buffer is currently in existence or planned for at this moment in time). Transitional areas have a unique goal in the sense of the comprehensive plan; one being a transition from a more intensive area or zoning to that of a less intensive land use or zoning; two, being a buffering land usage to help isolate. Goal Two of the Transitional Areas section of the Comprehensive Plan states:

"Transition Areas should be used to graduate density and intensity of activity to maintain connectivity (to commercial areas), improve pedestrian experience, and provide areas for increased housing and nonresidential options not currently being met."

With the population characteristics this area has, coupled with the existing land use patterns observed in the field, transitional usage is something that is lacking in this area in general. There is a stark contrast in land uses in terms of intensity of uses. Heavy intensity commercial areas may be appropriate in this area and necessary in the future, however industrial certainly is not appropriate in this area under any circumstance. The proposed Vision Plan map allows for some higher intensity commercial activities and more importantly provides opportunities to diversify both housing and commercial options in the area. Transitional areas also can function as lower intensity commercial

zoning providing a buffer and transition from that of a higher commercial zoning or intensity. Zoning decisions in the future will be based upon this map in accordance with state law and as such, it is extremely important to get them right. Mistakes in zoning can take decades to correct and even then the damage has already been done to the community and surrounding property owners through devaluation of property and disinvestment in property. This leads to a loss in tax base as properties fall into disrepair and abandonment, this trend also pushes development further and further outside of the City. The proposed amendment will allow this area to grow sustainably for the current term and the future; this amendment works for current commercial property owners and even gives those property owners surrounding the commercial developments many options to develop their property for the first time. Most importantly, the character and quietness of existing residential developments can be protected in the short term and in the future. A lot of this area has room for infill development through subdivisions of property, but there are still opportunities for first time development of a properties that currently sit vacant. As such, it is paramount that this Vision Plan match the desires and goals of the community before the development begins in the first place. Staff finds that if this proposal is approved that development will occur in a sustainable and responsible manner both now and in the future, something paramount in this neighborhood as with any other in the community. For all of these reasons, staff recommends approving the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan's Vision Plan Map.

Attachments: Summary table of land uses observed in study area;

Current Vision Plan Map of the area; Current land use map of the area; Proposed Vision Plan Map; Map showing Census Data Blocks; Census Demographic Data for the area; and Draft minute excerpt from the August 19, 2013 Planning

Commission Meeting.

Presentation: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner

Total Parcels % Parcels Land Area (acres) % Land Area

Vacant Land Residential (VLR) 89 35.60% 102.35 36.44%

Low Density residential (LDR) 81 32.40% 112.6 40.09%

Higher Density Residential (HDR) 67 26.80% 28.4 10.11%

Non-neighborhood Commercial (NNC) 7 2.80% 26.7 9.51%

Neighborhood Serving Commercial (NSC) 4 1.60% 3.78 1.35%

Vacant Land Commercial (VLC) 2 0.80% 7.05 2.51%

Total 250 100.00% 280.88 100.00%

Block 5000, Block 5001, Block 5006, Block 5007, Block 5008, Block 5009, Block 5017, Total59 33 17 5 9 13 18 283

35 20 8 4 5 9 11 155

2 0 1 0 0 0 0 8

2 0 1 0 0 0 1 7

6 4 1 0 0 0 3 22

5 1 1 0 0 0 1 11

4 1 1 1 1 1 0 11

1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5

1 2 1 0 1 0 1 9

2 1 0 0 0 0 0 7

2 4 0 1 0 0 1 13

2 2 0 0 1 1 0 8

1 1 0 0 0 1 1 8

0 0 1 0 0 1 1 8

0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4

0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3

1 1 0 0 1 1 0 6

1 1 1 0 0 1 1 7

1 0 0 0 0 1 0 6

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

24 13 9 1 4 4 7 128

1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6

3 2 0 0 0 0 0 10

0 2 1 0 1 0 0 8

2 1 2 0 0 1 0 8

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

1 1 1 0 0 0 0 9

3 1 0 0 0 0 0 7

4 0 1 0 1 1 0 9

1 2 1 1 0 1 4 14

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5

1 2 1 0 0 0 0 11

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4

2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 1 0 0 1 0 0 5

0 0 1 0 0 1 1 4

2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

1 0 0 0 1 0 0 4

P12: SEX BY AGE - Universe: Total 2010 Census Summary File 1

Block 1013, Total: 129 Male: 63 Under 5 years 5 5 to 9 years 3 10 to 14 years 8 15 to 17 years 3 18 and 19 years 2 20 years 0 21 years 1 22 to 24 years 0 25 to 29 years 3 30 to 34 years 3 35 to 39 years 4 40 to 44 years 5 45 to 49 years 2 50 to 54 years 4 55 to 59 years 5 60 and 61 years 0 62 to 64 years 3 65 and 66 years 2 67 to 69 years 1 70 to 74 years 2 75 to 79 years 2 80 to 84 years 4 85 years and over 1 Female: 66 Under 5 years 4 5 to 9 years 5 10 to 14 years 4 15 to 17 years 2 18 and 19 years 2 20 years 1 21 years 0 22 to 24 years 1 25 to 29 years 3 30 to 34 years 6 35 to 39 years 3 40 to 44 years 2 45 to 49 years 4 50 to 54 years 4 55 to 59 years 7 60 and 61 years 3 62 to 64 years 3 65 and 66 years 0 67 to 69 years 2 70 to 74 years 1

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010

75 to 79 years 2 80 to 84 years 5 85 years and over 2

Block 5000, Block 5001, Block 5006, Block 5007, Block 5008, Block 5009, Block 5017,

32.5 38.5 19.5 43.5 48.5 52.5 44.519.3 39 17.5 32.5 48.5 55.5 25.541 38.5 30.5 46.5 54.5 44 48.8

P13: MEDIAN AGE BY SEX - Universe: 2010 Census Summary File 1

Block 1013, Median age --


Both sexes 41.3 Male 39.5 Female 44.5

Block 5000, Block 5001, Block 5006, Block 5007, Block 5008, Block 5009, Block 5017, Totals

59 33 17 5 9 13 18 283

57 32 17 5 9 13 18 277

47 25 13 0 9 13 16 228

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 6 3 5 0 0 2 44

2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6

2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

P1: RACE - Universe: Total population2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public

Block 1013, Total: 129 Population of one race: 126 White alone 105 Black or African American alone 0 American Indian and Alaska Native 3 Asian alone 0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific 0 Some Other Race alone 18 Two or More Races: 3 Population of two races: 3 White; Black or African American 0 White; American Indian and Alaska 2 White; Asian 0 White; Native Hawaiian and Other 0 White; Some Other Race 1 Black or African American; American 0 Black or African American; Asian 0 Black or African American; Native 0 Black or African American; Some 0 American Indian and Alaska Native; 0 American Indian and Alaska Native; 0 American Indian and Alaska Native; 0 Asian; Native Hawaiian and Other 0 Asian; Some Other Race 0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific 0


Block 5000, Block 5001, Block 5006, Block 5007, Block 5008, Block 5009, Block 5017, Totals

18 12 6 2 4 7 6 103

13 5 5 1 3 7 5 80

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 0 1 0 0 0 0 6

2 1 0 1 0 0 0 10

2 1 1 0 0 2 3 15

0 1 2 0 0 1 1 12

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

2 1 0 0 2 2 0 10

2 1 1 0 0 2 1 16

2 0 0 0 1 0 0 5

5 7 1 1 1 0 1 23

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

2 3 1 0 0 0 1 9

1 3 0 0 1 0 0 7

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Householder 75 to 84 years 0 Householder 85 years and over 1


Householder 55 to 59 years 1 Householder 60 to 64 years 0 Householder 65 to 74 years 0


Householder 85 years and over 2 Renter occupied: 7 Householder 15 to 24 years 0



Owner occupied: 41 Householder 15 to 24 years 0 Householder 25 to 34 years 3

H17: TENURE BY AGE OF 2010 Census Summary File 1

Block 1013, Total: 48

Block 5000, Block 5001, Block 5006, Block 5007, Block 5008, Block 5009, Block 5017, Total

59 33 17 5 9 13 18 283

26 10 9 4 1 7 4 123

18 10 3 0 3 6 13 99

15 13 5 1 5 0 1 61

H11: TOTAL POPULATION IN 2010 Census Summary File 1

Block 1013, Total population in occupied housing 129


Owned with a mortgage or a loan 62 Owned free and clear 46 Renter occupied 21


59 33 17 5 9 13 18 283

59 33 17 5 9 13 18 283

53 30 15 4 7 9 15 240

14 9 4 1 2 3 4 67

11 4 1 1 2 3 3 42

3 5 3 0 0 0 1 25

11 1 2 1 1 3 2 37

18 12 9 2 2 3 5 83

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

5 3 0 0 0 0 0 20

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3

0 0 0 0 1 0 3 7

1 2 0 0 1 0 1 10

6 3 2 1 2 4 3 43

3 3 1 1 1 4 1 22

2 3 1 1 1 4 1 20

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

1 0 1 0 1 0 1 14

1 0 1 0 1 0 0 11

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3

2 0 0 0 0 0 1 7

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

P29: HOUSEHOLD TYPE BY 2010 Census Summary File 1

Block 1013, Total: 129 In households: 129 In family households: 107 Householder: 30 Male 17 Female 13 Spouse 16 Biological child 32 Adopted child 0 Stepchild 5 Grandchild 12 Brother or sister 2 Parent 0 Parent-in-law 0 Son-in-law or daughter-in-law 2 Other relatives 3 Nonrelatives 5 In nonfamily households: 22 Male householder: 8 Living alone 7 Not living alone 1 Female householder: 10 Living alone 8 Not living alone 2 Nonrelatives 4 In group quarters: 0 Institutionalized population 0 Noninstitutionalized population 0

Block 5000, Block 5001, Block 5006, Block 5007, Block 5008, Block 5009, Block 5017,

3.28 2.75 2.83 2.5 2.25 1.86 33.38 4 2.4 4 1.33 1.86 3.43 1.86 5 1 5 0 1


Total 2.69 Owner occupied 2.63 Renter occupied 3

H12: AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE OF 2010 Census Summary File 1

Block 1013, Average household size --


18 12 6 2 4 7 6 103

14 9 4 1 2 3 4 67

11 1 2 1 1 3 2 37

3 8 2 0 1 0 2 30

1 3 0 0 1 0 1 10

2 5 2 0 0 0 1 20

4 3 2 1 2 4 2 36

3 3 2 1 2 4 1 31

1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5

P18: HOUSEHOLD TYPE - Universe: 2010 Census Summary File 1

Block 1013, Total: 48 Family households: 30 Husband-wife family 16 Other family: 14 Male householder, no wife present 4 Female householder, no husband 10 Nonfamily households: 18 Householder living alone 15 Householder not living alone 3

NOTE: A household that has at least one

member of the household related to the

householder by birth, marriage, or

adoption is a "Family household." Same-

sex couple households are included in the

family households category if there is at

least one additional person related to the

householder by birth or adoption. Same-

sex couple households with no relatives of

the householder present are tabulated in

nonfamily households. Responses of

"same-sex spouse" were edited during

processing to "unmarried partner."

"Nonfamily households" consist of people

living alone and households which do not

have any members related to the Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010


20 13 6 2 4 8 7 115

18 12 6 2 4 7 6 103

2 1 0 0 0 1 1 12

Total: 55 Occupied 48 Vacant 7


H3: OCCUPANCY STATUS - Universe: 2010 Census Summary File 1

Block 1013,

IX. Discussion and possible action to amend portions of the Vision Plan

Component of the 2009 update to the San Angelo Comprehensive Plan,

specifically Properties located within an approximately 1,800 foot radius of the

intersection of Armstrong Street and 28th Street in north-central San Angelo.

Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner, came forward to present this item. This item was requested by a property owner within the study area. No notification was required for this request as a Vision Map Amendment does not re-zone anyone's property. Mr. Hintz discussed the characteristics of the area and explained the process that was taken by staff to study and research the area. The area is home to several commercial entities at this time including a warehouse, television studios, and a TXDot office and warehouse. General rationale for the amendment was presented as to why certain envisioned areas were placed onto the map as well. Some general discussion about what types of land uses were appropriate in each envisioned area, and would be appropriate given the surroundings of the area. No one came forward to speak in favor or in opposition of the amendment to the Vision Plan Map. Motion to approve as presented was made by Sammy Farmer and seconded by Mark Crisp. The motion passed 5-0.

City of San Angelo

Memo

Meeting Date: August 20, 2013



Subject: Vision Plan - Proposed Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for

the following area of the City:

Location: Properties located south from the intersection of Grand Canal Road

and US Highway 277, south to the City Limit Line, and properties located just east of the City Limits line, but outside the City Limits in southern San Angelo. Please see attached maps on this report for a more detailed description.

Purpose: Approval or modification of this request will forward that

recommendation to City Council for a final decision on the matter.

Contacts: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner - and- 657-4210

AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services

Caption: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO VISION PLAN COMPONENT

OF THE SAN ANGELO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ADOPTED IN 2009, SPECIFICALLY PROPERTIES LOCATED SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF GRAND CANAL ROAD AND US HIGHWAY 277, SOUTH TO THE CITY LIMIT LINE, AND PROPERTIES LOCATED JUST EAST OF THE CITY LIMITS LINE, BUT OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS IN SOUTHERN SAN ANGELO.


Approve the proposed Vision Plan map amendments as presented; Remand the Vision Plan map back to Planning Commission for further discussion; or

Deny the proposed Vision Plan Map Amendment in its entirety or on a property by property basis.

Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed Vision

Plan Map Amendment. At the July 15 Planning Commission Meeting, the proposal was recommended for approval by a vote of 6-0.


This majority of this area was annexed to the city limits in 1997. At that time, many of the uses in place included heavier commercial and lighter industrial types. Since that time, neighborhood type development has occurred behind these developments and south of Grand Canal Road.

This proposed amendment was passed partially by the Council at the May 14th meeting with the remainder of the area being remanded to the Planning Commission for further discussion and future submittal of an alternate proposal to the Council at a future date. At the June 17 Planning Commission meeting, staff was directed to come up with a proposal that was more compatible and less of a change than that of the original amendment. The final map in this report illustrates this revised proposal as a result of discussions with the Planning Commission and City Council.

Analysis:

The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.

This area, prior to annexation in 1997, was home to more sprawling, but higher intensity land uses; several of these land uses and the structures associated with them are still present to this day. As early 1999, the properties south of Grand Canal Road were subdivided; the area near the intersection for Templin Court and Grand Canal Road was established around 2000. In later years, this residential development continued to the north and east along Grand Canal Road and in 2005, a re-subdivision of this area created Clarice Court. Upon examination of the area, nearly all of these lots have been filled by single family homes, with the exceptions being a couple of lots closest to the industrial and heavier commercial development. This area is home to uses at opposite ends of the land use spectrum that result in some incompatibilities. Generally speaking, residential areas are more successful when isolated from higher-intensity land uses allowed in industrial type zoning. This isn't to say the two designations cannot work in close proximity to one another, but the Comprehensive Plan seeks to buffer these types of land uses with some intermediate zoning designation and land use. In the case of this general region, that bridge or buffering area is not in place. Given that these juxtapositions of land uses occur, it would be prudent for this area to be re-envisioned now so that development in the future can be harmonious with what is present now.

Staff does realize that the industrial areas with higher intensities of land uses were in place prior to the development of this residential neighborhood. As such, it would be highly advantageous to now establish nodes of industrial and commercial areas so that the long term benefit and enjoyment of properties within this area will continue well into the future. Several of the goals within the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan is to create predictable land use patterns and consistent development throughout the community for residential, commercial, industrial and other properties. By allowing no transition or "step-down" area from higher-intensity uses into much lower-intensity residential uses, the predictability of future developments is compromised. Developers Clearly, the stark contrast in place now between these land uses (at extreme opposites of the land use spectrum) does not lend itself to predictability; the proper way to build in and create it is an amendment to the Vision Plan Map within the Comprehensive Plan. It should also be pointed out that this proposed amendment is a vision of the future and does not actually rezone property. However, if the present development patterns of this residential area continue, some commercial opportunities or mixed use opportunities may present themselves in the future. Industrial areas (as currently visioned) do not allow for either of these to occur without an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. By addressing these realities now, future owners, developers, and investors in property will be afforded opportunities to diversify the development in the area. As areas become more diverse, people are able to meet daily needs within walking distance, factories and businesses are able to have workers who live nearby, and commercial enterprises are located much closer to their customer bases. Locating and excluding land uses from one another does not necessarily lead to successful long-term sustainability. Having large pockets and strips of commercial areas creates traffic congestion; if these areas are not spread out in proportion to the population base of the community, areas of town become congested at certain times while other areas go underutilized and eventually developers and property owners become disconnected from that area; over time the area becomes forgotten and eventually, disinvestment occurs. By addressing this issue now, diversification may occur and new development opportunities can be realized before it becomes too late. As industrial and commercial trends change, the highest and best use of the land also changes. Having exclusively one type of envisioned development can lead to negative consequences for an area. By providing for a wide range of uses, the area can re-invent itself while still retaining the predictability and consistency of development everyone in the community seeks. Diversification allows areas to feed off of one another, creating synergy that maintains activity - and thus, business - on a long-term basis. Regarding the proposed changes to the Vision Plan map: the most noticeable one is that the large swath of land area currently envisioned as "Industrial", directly adjacent to the neighborhood areas, has been removed and replaced with other more compatible use types. Staff has found that "Transitional" areas - shown as brown on the proposed Vision Plan map excerpt - will be much more compatible with the existing neighborhood both now and in the future. These transitional areas will allow for development opportunities that are at a more appropriate intensity and density for the adjacent properties, and which factor in the street network and its capabilities. "Transitional" areas in this sense could potentially allow for intermediate uses such as offices, self

service storage warehouses, and higher-density residential opportunities to name but a few. The second change is the large, dark green parcel located north of Grand Canal Road. Currently envisioned for neighborhood development, this parcel is federally owned and contains a drainage area that would likely not be developed in the future. By preserving this area now as open space, it allows some predictability for neighbors both north and south of the canal some assurances that the area is not anticipated for development. It is also a more accurate representation of the property itself, and helps meet the suggestions from the Comprehensive Plan that encourage every neighborhood to be close to types of green space - which can include areas that are not necessarily limited to parks. Just south of the intersection of Grand Canal Road and Templin Court another parcel has been identified as open space; this area is a low spot where drainage currently flows, preserving this as open space in the future will also greatly benefit this area. Two other changes occur at the core of the residential area; a "Neighborhood Center" indicated in pink has been added, and the "Industrial" development at western edge of the city limits (surrounded by current and future envisioned areas of "Neighborhood" development) has been replaced with a "Neighborhood" development designation. This "Neighborhood Center" is intended for lower-intensity commercial enterprises that, generally speaking, will serve the neighborhood without the full intensity of development that commercial areas allow. In addition, higher-density residential opportunities are also encouraged within "Neighborhood Centers". Generally speaking, "Neighborhood Centers" should be located at nodes on key intersections; in this case, when factoring in traffic patterns and accessibility, this particular parcel is readily and easily accessible to the established neighborhoods without having to access Highway 277. As such, the "Neighborhood Center" located south of the existing city limits line has been replaced with rural envisioned development. East of Highway 277, a large strip of commercial development was envisioned for the future. In analyzing this area, several parcels currently sit vacant or underutilized at this time that already have commercial zoning designations. Given the isolation and lack of thru streets to these properties, coupled with the fact that vacant commercially-zoned properties exist north and east of this study area, and within the study area, more commercial envisioned development is not necessary for the area at this time. In the future, changed conditions may require that this area be looked at again, but for the time being the balance of commercial properties in this area is more than the area needs for the foreseeable future. Commercial areas have been located between industrial properties in such a way that the commercial properties are adjacent to neighborhoods and transitional areas for the most part. The transition from industrial, into commercial or transitional, and finally into neighborhoods is something that is highly recommended within the Comprehensive Plan and by Planning staff. The transitions - if established in this order - are logical and predictable, and if followed, will lead to predictable development that all property owners can enjoy both now and in the future. By creating buffer zones and transitions between industrial areas, they will be allowed to flourish without being a detriment to the neighboring, less intensely used properties. By adding in some commercial areas that will serve as a buffer to the neighboring residential uses, more diverse opportunities

may exist which will benefit all residents of the area and the community as a whole. Presently, this area is all envisioned for industrial development which would not allow for neighborhood serving businesses or general retail establishments. Given the growing and established neighborhoods in this area, not capitalizing on this opportunity to introduce these types of developments now, before it gets to be too late would be a mistake. These commercially-envisioned areas are located in highly visible areas and will allow for the highest and best uses of these properties without being a detriment to the function of the roadways, traffic patterns, and land use patterns now or in the future.

Attachments: Current Vision Plan Map of the area;

Originally proposed Vision Plan map of the area which was

remanded back to Planning Commission; Thoroughfare Plan map of the area; Revised Vision Plan Map of the area as resulting from

discussion with Planning Commission and City Council; July 15 draft Planning Commission Minutes; June 17 Planning Commission Minutes; May 14 City Council Minutes; and April 15 Planning Commission Minutes.


IX. Discussion and possible action to amend portions of the Vision Plan

Component of the 2009 update to the San Angelo Comprehensive Plan, as

remanded to Planning Commission by the City Council regarding the following

amendment previously approved by the Planning Commission:

Properties located south from the intersection of Grand Canal Road and US Highway 277, south to the City Limit Line, and properties located just east of the City Limits line, but outside the City Limits in southern San Angelo.

Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner came forth to speak on proposed changes to the

original proposed Plan presented and remanded back by City Council. The area is located along Grand Canal Road in southeast San Angelo. The original proposed Plan incorporates buffers between residential and industrial zones as well as relocating the proposed Neighborhood Center, in an area south of Grand Canal Road. Transition designation was used as buffers – which could in this instance allow for CN, CO and CG zoning and which could possibly allow for increased density, residential development or neighborhood scale compatible commercial development. The drainage canal is being proposed for Open Space, since the area is un-buildable and serves as open space now and likely will continue to do so in the future.

Mr. Wynne was in favor of the current Vision Plan that exists, and was partially

amended by the City Council as a result of a recent zone change in the area. Mr. Wynne expressed concern for an area that is being proposed for ‘Commercial’, but is industrial in nature, with the possible plans for expansion.

Mr. Smith stated that the designation will not affect the current zoning and the uses

allowed in the district. Mr. Hintz elaborated on this point and stated that this is a Vision Plan for the next 25-50 years; this process does not change anyone's zoning, nor does it require anyone to apply for a zone change.

Mr. Hintz mentioned that the proponents are able to make the request for a zone

change – but staff and the Planning Commission are legally required to use the Vision Plan as a central component in making a recommendation to the City Council, who in turn is also guided by this document, when making zoning decisions.

Ms. Jackson asked about the existing uses for the area being proposed for

Transitional. Mr. Wynne stated that there are some houses and warehouses in this area. Mr. Hintz stated that the transitional areas were currently occupied by a residence, contractor, and the other was vacant at this time. Mr. Smith believed some of these areas might be a good place to develop townhouses or other higher density residential projects.

Some discussion about the order of the maps in the report took place and Mr. Hintz apologized for the titling mishap, but clarified which map that was presented contained the proposed request by staff as directed at the last Planning Commission meeting. Motion to approve was made by Ryan Smith and seconded by Valerie Priess and passed 6-0.

B: Properties located south from the intersection of Grand Canal Road and US Highway 277, south to the City Limit Line, and properties located just east of the City Limits line, but outside the City Limits in southern San Angelo.

Mr. Hintz explained the history of what was proposed and went through how it is

different as presented. A portion of this amendment was approved by the City Council, however the remainder was remanded to the Planning Commission for more discussion. More transitional envisioned areas were put into place with an enlarged commercial use; the commercial uses were added in places where industrial envisioned use was directly adjacent to neighborhood envisioned uses. City Council had directed staff and the Planning Commission to work to find a Vision that was a bit more in line with some of the current uses of property that was less drastic of a change as presented at the time.

Mr. Wynne didn’t see the box factory of being neighborhood center in the future, and

anticipated several other industrial uses to be present for some time. Mr. Lawrence explained the rationale behind the area not being a neighborhood any longer due to heavy emphasis on industrial uses.

Joe Grimes made a motion for staff to come up with a compromise on the current

amendment presented today and what Council was looking for in this particular area. Valerie Priess seconded this motion, which passed 5-0.

Minutes Vol. 104 May 14, 2013 Z 13-13: David and Pam Hilton AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 525 Preusser Street, located at the southwest corner of Preusser Street and North Poe Street. This property specifically occupies the Ellis Addition Block 4, N 115' of Lots 1 & 2 and E 33.5' of Frary Addition, Block 19, Lot 6, in central San Angelo, adding the zoning classification of Historic Overlay (HO) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplement Record. General discussion was held on the L-shaped lot, staff’s explanation noting the historic designation is applied by the tax parcel, and that such designation only applies to the structure. Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Silvas and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously. DIRECTION TO STAFF TO REMAND THE AMENDMENT TO VISION PLAN COMPONENT OF THE SAN ANGELO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ADOPTED IN 2009, SPECIFICALLY PROPERTIES STARTING APPROXIMATELY 800 FEET WEST FROM THE INTERSECTION OF LOOP 306 AND BAZE STREET, THENCE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION TO FM 2105, AND EASTERLY THROUGH THE CITY LANDFILL AND ENCOMPASSING PROPERTIES ANNEXED TO THE CITY LIMITS IN DECEMBER OF 2011, AND CITY OWNED PROPERTIES EAST OF NORTH US HIGHWAY 67 NORTH AND EAST OF THE CURRENT INDUSTRIAL PARK IN THE FAR NORTHEAST PORTION OF SAN ANGELO Interim Senior Planner Jeff Hintz presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplement Record. General discussion was held on the types of zoning classifications, allowable uses within the classifications, the need to provide flexibility to the owners by designating the entire area industrial, and the necessary notification requirements should the classifications change. Motion, to remand the amendment to the Planning Commission, particularly to further review the commercial designation within the proposed area, was made by Councilmember Morrison and seconded by Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE THOROUGHFARE PLAN COMPONENT OF SAN ANGELO'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, SPECIFICALLY PLANNED PROJECTIONS OF SMITH BOULEVARD AND PAULANN BOULEVARD AND OTHER PLANNED THOROUGHFARES IN NORTHEAST SAN ANGELO Interim Senior Planner Jeff Hintz presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplement Record. General discussion was held on the future planned roads and future connectivity. Motion, to approve the amendment, as presented, was made by Councilmember Morrison and seconded by Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED PROPOSAL TO VISION PLAN COMPONENT OF THE SAN ANGELO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ADOPTED IN 2009, SPECIFICALLY PROPERTIES LOCATED SOUTH FROM THE INTERSECTION OF GRAND CANAL ROAD AND US HIGHWAY 277, SOUTH TO THE CITY LIMIT LINE, AND PROPERTIES LOCATED JUST EAST OF THE CITY LIMITS LINE, BUT OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS IN SOUTHERN SAN ANGELO; AND, DIRECT TO STAFF TO REMAND

Minutes Page 511 May 14, 2013 Vol. 104 THE REMAINING PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER REVIEW Interim Senior Planner Jeff Hintz presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplement Record. General discussion was held on the impact to existing businesses, Motion, to accept, as presented, was made by Councilmember Alexander. Motion failed due to the lack of a second. Motion, to approve proposed the changes bounded by Clarice Court , north grand canal road to east of 277, including Grand Canal Point Addition Tracts 1,2,3,4 and Sunset Ranch Estates , Lot 17, as presented; and, remanding the remaining proposed changes to the Planning Commission, was made by Councilmember Hirschfeld and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Further discussion was held on the future development of housing located next to commercial zoned properties, conditional uses, allowable uses within the various zones, protecting the future development for the existing property owners, future property uses, and correcting those with non-compliance zone uses. A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously. FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO PD 13-02: Luke Burnett AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT 1245 Grand Canal Road, located approximately 500 feet east of the intersection of Grand Canal Road and Clarice Court. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Sunset Ranch Estates, Section Two, Block Two, Lot 17B in southern San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Office Warehouse (OW) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY Interim Senior Planner Jeff Hintz presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplement Record. Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Morrison. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER #15 TO INCLUDE THE REPAIR OF THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE WEST OF ABE STREET UNDER THE AGREEMENT WITH TEMPLETON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., CONSTRUCTION MANGER AT RISK, FOR THE CONCHO RIVER & PARKS REHABILITATION PROJECT PK-05-10 IN THE AMOUNT OF $167,128.00, AND REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR SAID AMOUNT TO BE FUNDED IN EQUAL PARTS BY RIVER PROJECT CONTINGENCY FUNDS AND THE CITY SELF-INSURANCE FUND; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CHANGE ORDER Parks and Recreation Director Carl White presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplement Record. Motion, to approve the change order, as presented, was made by Councilmember Morrison and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. General discussion was held on whether to repair or rebuild the bridge, and the cost differential. A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously.

VII. Discussion and possible action to amend portions of the Vision Plan

Component of the 2009 update to the San Angelo Comprehensive Plan,

specifically properties located south from the intersection of Grand Canal

Road and US Highway 277, south to the City Limit Line, and properties located

just east of the City Limits line, but outside the City Limits in southern San

Angelo.

Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner came forward to present this request. Staff recommends approving amendments to the Vision Plan. He explained how the industrial uses could be buffered away from the area, and that industrial uses had already existed in the area. He showed a drainage area on the map and explained an intersection that was problematic, discussing how TXDot had already been apprised of accidents that had occurred there and was aware of the problem. Mr. Grimes questioned the neighborhood center section of the proposed amendment. Mr. Hintz explained that it would better serve the current neighborhood, however, the current proposal did not provide ease of accessibility and also that traffic problems could arise due to the intersection. The current Vision Plan shows the area as industrial. Luke Burnett spoke in favor of the Vision Plan amendment. He explained how he approached the City about buying a lot in the area; lot 17. He explained how he wanted to buy the property and fabricate steel buildings in the area, that the steel supplier was nearby, with easy access to the highways. He understood that a zone change could not be recommended by staff without it meshing with the Vision Plan. He explained what his intentions for the area is, which will be discussed in the upcoming case at this meeting (PD13-02: Luke Burnett). No opposition was presented. Mr. Grimes made a motion to approve the staff recommended changes, Mr. Smith seconded it. Motion passed unanimously, 6-0.

City of San

Angelo

Memo

Meeting Date: August 6, 2013



Subject: An ordinance amending the Mobile Home Skirting

Regulations for commercial properties selling mobile and manufactured homes.

Purpose: Adoption of this ordinance will change skirting requirements

for commercial properties with manufactured homes for sale. This ordinance also updates terminology referring to these types of dwelling units by adding the term Manufactured Home.

Contacts: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services &

Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner 325-657-4210

Caption: FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF AN

ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 ENTITLED “PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT”, ARTICLE 12.500 ENTITLED “MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS”, BY AMENDING ARTICLE’S TITLE TO READ, “MANUFACTURED HOME AND MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS”; REPEALING SUB-SECTION 12.503 ENTITLED “SKIRTING”, ENACTING A NEW SUB-SECTION 12.503 ENTITLED “SKIRTING” AND ADDING SUB-SECTION 12.503(a) AND SUB-SECTION 12.503(b); RENAMING 12.504 ENTITLED “TEMPORARY MOBILE HOME INSTALLATION”, TO “TEMPORARY MANUFACTURED HOME, MOBILE HOME OR BUILDING INSTALLATION”, ADDING REFERENCE TO “MANUFACTURED HOME” IN SUB-SECTION 12.504(a) AND SUB-SECTION 12.504(c), OF THE SAN ANGELO CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.


1) Approve the Amendment; or 2) Modify and approve the Amendment; or 3) Deny the Amendment.

Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed

amendment to the Mobile Home Skirting Regulations and Terminology.


In November of 2011 the Planning Commission heard and approved with conditions case CU 11-16. During this presentation there was some discussion regarding the skirting of mobile or manufactured housing units. The way the ordinance is currently written, all mobile and manufactured homes regardless of the zoning classification they are in, are required be skirted if in place for over 120 days. This would include any dealership selling or displaying these types of homes for perspective buyers. As a result of this discussion with the Planning Commission members, staff has added a clause exempting Mobile and Manufactured Home dealers from this skirting requirement. Skirting is required on mobile homes to ensure consistent development patterns and consistent appearance within San Angelo's neighborhoods. Un-skirted mobile homes appear out of character and stand out in a neighborhood. In addition, leaving the housing unit un-skirted allows for easy access to the underside of the structure by rodents, pests, and other creatures. These types of creatures have a tendency to chew on wires, pipes, and generally speaking do not belong living beneath someone's housing unit. Skirting is essential in helping to keep these creatures away from the underside of manufactured or mobile residential units; in a commercial or industrial trade area this is less of a concern as these homes are for sale and display and not intended or allowed to be lived in under any circumstance. Being forced to skirt homes that are not intended for residential use places an unnecessary hardship on dealers and businesses selling these homes in staff's findings. If the homes are for sale and display at a licensed mobile home dealership, neighborhood character is much less of an issue. Manufactured Home dealerships are classified in the Zoning Ordinance as "Wholesale Trade" and this type of use is allowed in the more intensive commercial and any industrial zoning designations. Placement of this type of land use adjacent to a neighborhood would require a zoning district that is not compatible with the neighborhood and surrounding land uses and is not likely to be recommended by Planning staff. 315.G.4.b of the Zoning Ordinance specifically states that the sales of manufactured homes are classified as wholesale trade, not retail sales

and service. This assures that this type of land use will only occur in the more intensive commercial areas and any industrial area within the City Limits. As such the visual impacts of not skirting a manufactured home for sale will not be felt by residential neighborhoods generally speaking.

Attachments: minute excerpt from November 2011 Planning

Commission; draft ordinance with changes highlighted in red.


IV. Request for approval of Conditional Use. [Planning Commission makes final

decision; appeals may be directed to City Council.]

A. CU 11-16: Lucky Seven Enterprises

a request for approval of a Conditional Use to allow Wholesale Trade in a General Commercial (CG) zoning district, on the following property:

4100 Ben Ficklin Road, a 3.17 acre parcel situated between Lancer Lane & Ben Ficklin Road, and located roughly 270 feet east from the intersection of Mobile Park Drive and Lancer Lane, out of the South Concho Mobile Home Park, Tract 2, in south central San Angelo.

Jesus Vazquez, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff recommendation of approval. Five notifications were sent out, with 2 returned in favor and 1 returned in opposition. The subject property is surrounded by CH, CG/CH, and OW to the north and east. To the west and south is RM-1 and RS-1 zoning. A current mobile home park exists to the west of the site and an RV sales use is to the north. The Vision Map component of the Comprehensive Plan calls for ‘commercial’ at this location. The property is currently vacant and undeveloped. Mr. Vazquez reviewed the possible actions on this case. The site does provide an ease of access to the nearby thoroughfare of South Bryant Boulevard. In addition, the wholesale use is consistent with the ‘commercial’ called for at this location. The notification returned in opposition had a concern with the traffic being send northward down South Bryant as there is an existing “blind spot” for traffic at the intersection of Ben Ficklin road. Ben Jenkins asked a question about the requirement in the City Ordinance that mobile or manufactured homes be skirted if left in place for a particular period of time. Staff responded that this requirement is a requirement not of the Zoning Ordinance, but of the general City Ordinance, and was re-iterated within the staff report to make the proponent aware. Joe Grimes asked about the proximity to the residential zoning to the south. Staff explained that the commercial zoning exists today at this location; while not ideal, the nature of this request does not allow for a removal of that zoning designation; however, the chance to hear a Conditional Use request allows the Commission to place any conditions as it deems necessary to make the use more appropriate at that location. Ben Jenkins also asked about the need for curbing. Staff responded that, in situations where subdivisions are required, curbing is generally a requirement of street improvements; however, in the case of a Conditional Use, it is often considered on a case-by-case basis. Particularly if the site is already laid out and buildings in place, there are entry and exit points that are articulated. In this case, it is certainly a possibility – however, because the land is vacant and undeveloped, there is not ultimately knowledge of how the site will develop. Bill Lawrence asked if mobile or manufactured homes could be built or assembled on site, and staff clarified that they could not; this would constitute a manufacturing use which is not allowed in the CG zoning district. Construction work requiring a permit would also not be allowed on the site as it is currently zoned. No one came forward to speak in favor or in opposition to the request. The Commission asked questions about the safeguards in place to prevent individuals for living in these structures. Staff explained the requirement for privacy fence as it is written in the ordinance.

Bill Lawrence asked the proponent, Clint Hemby, if the venture would be for new or used mobile or manufactured homes. The proponent indicated that the mobile or manufactured homes would be new, although they would accept trade-ins. The staff pulled up the aerial photos and Mr. Hemby indicated that there would be a main entry-exit point midway along the lot, onto Ben Ficklin Road. Sam Tambunga made the point that this location would allow these structures to be moved with the utilization of Loop 306. Motion, to approve as presented, with the additional condition that curbing be added along the frontage of the lot, along Ben Ficklin Road, was made by Ben Jenkins and seconded by Bill Wynne. This curbing may be typical or lay-down curb, with the curb cut as required by City Ordinance. The motion passed unanimously, 6-0.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 “PLANNING

& DEVELOPMENT”, ARTICLE 12.500 “MOBILE HOME

REGULATIONS”, OF THE SAN ANGELO CODE OF

ORDINANCES BY AMENDING THE TITLE OF ARTICLE

12.500 TO READ, “MANUFACTURED HOME AND

MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS”; RESTATING SECTION

12.503 “SKIRTING” BY ADDING MANUFACTURED

HOMES AND PROVIDING AN EXCEPTION FOR

LICENSED DEALERSHIPS AND RETAILERS;

AMENDING SECTION 12.504 “TEMPORARY MOBILE

HOME INSTALLATION” BY AMENDING THE SECTION

TITLE TO “TEMPORARY MANUFACTURED HOME,

MOBILE HOME OR BUILDING INSTALLATION”, AND

RESTATING SUBPARAGRAPHS (a) AND (c) OF SAID

SECTION TO REFERENCE MANUFACTURED HOME;

PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR A

PENALTY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:

Section 1.) THAT, Chapter 12, “Planning & development”, Article 12.500 “Mobile Home

Regulations’ is hereby amended by amending the title of Article 12.500; by

restating section 12.503 “Skirting”, by amending section 12.504 “Temporary

Mobile Home Installation” by amending the Section title and restating

subparagraphs 9a) and (c) of said section, to read as:

ARTICLE 12.500 MANUFACTURED HOME AND MOBILE HOME

REGULATIONS

Sec. 12.503 Skirting

(a) All manufactured homes and mobile homes for use as a dwelling in any

area determined appropriate by the municipality, including a subdivision, planned unit

development, single lot and rental community or park, which have been in place for a

period greater than one hundred twenty (120) days, shall be skirted in accordance with

the official code of the city.

(b) Exception: There is excepted from this provision any manufactured home

or mobile home displayed for sale by a manufactured home or mobile home dealership

and/or retailer licensed under the Texas Occupations Code, Chapter 1201 Manufactured

Housing, Section 1201.101, and meeting all City Ordinances, in this instance, no skirting

shall be required.

Sec. 12.504 Temporary Manufactured Home, Mobile Home or Building Installation

(a) A manufactured home, mobile home or building may be temporarily

installed on a site, during the construction or reconstruction of a home or building on the

same site, with permission of the city council.

(c) Any request for installation of a manufactured home, mobile home or

building which would remain for more than one year shall first be heard by the planning

commission after notification of property owners within two hundred feet (200') of the

proposed site. The planning commission shall forward its recommendation to the city

council for final action at a regular meeting of said council.

Section 2.) THAT, the terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be

severable in that if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid,

the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

Section 3.) THAT, the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:

Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a

misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be subject to a fine as provided for in

Section 1.106 of this Code. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate

offense.

Section 4.) THAT, this Ordinance shall be effective on, from and after the date of adoption.

INTRODUCED on the 6th day of August, 2013, and finally PASSED,

APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the 20th day of August, 2013.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO

ATTEST: BY:

Dwain Morrison, Mayor

By: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form:

AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Lysia H. Bowling

Development Services City Attorney

september 24, 2013 special meeting agenda packet

Documents

regular city council

city council meetings

city clerk

city council agenda

city hall

council meeting contact

city limits line

budget items