september 2007 - dublin
DESCRIPTION
Magnetic Field Upper Limits for Jet Formation. M. Kaufman Bernadó 1,* & M. Massi 1 1 Max Planck Institut für Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany * Humboldt Research Fellow. September 2007 - Dublin. Magnetic Field Upper Limits for Jet Formation. Necessary initial condition: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
September 2007 - Dublin
Magnetic Field Upper Limits
for Jet Formation
M. Kaufman Bernadó1,* & M. Massi1
1Max Planck Institut für Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany*Humboldt Research Fellow
Magnetic Field Upper Limits for Jet Formation
Necessary initial condition:a low magnetic field at the NS surface or at the last stable orbit of the accretion disk.
Aim: to quantify this important parameter and therefore give an upper limit for the magnetic field strength for which an ejection could happen in a NS or BH XRB system, as well as to predict the corresponding behaviour for Active Galactic Nuclei using standard scaling.
When will an accreting NS become a microquasar and when, on the other hand, an X-ray pulsar?
When will a BH XRB system be able to evolve into a microquasar phase?
PB > Pp
PB vs Pp
Initial Conditionfor Jet Formation:
twisted B
Magnetic Linesare compressed
PB
AMPLIFIED
START
PB < Pp
increaseM
Cycle A
The formation of a jet is based on
a competition process between the magnetic field pressure, PB, and the plasma pressure, Pp.
Summarised in a flowchart.
Numerical simulations show that the launch of a jet involves
a weak large-scale poloidal magnetic field anchored in
rapidly rotating disks or compact objects (Meier et al. 2001).
The strength of the large-scale poloidal field must be low enough that the Pp dominates PB (Blandford 1976).
Only under that condition, PB < Pp, the differentially rotating disk is
able to bend the magnetic field lines in a magnetic spiral (Meier et al.
2001).
Because of the increasing compression of the magnetic field lines, the
magnetic pressure will grow and may become larger than the gas
pressure on the surface of the accretion disk, where the density is lower.
Then, the magnetic field becomes “active”, i.e. dynamically dominant, PB > Pp, and the plasma has to follow the twisted magnetic field lines,
creating two spinning-plasma flows.
The generation of jets and their presence in XRBs is coupled to the
evolution of a cycle that can be observed in the X-ray states of this
kind of systems.
We therefore complement the jet formation flowchart showing the parallelism between the presence of a jet and the different X-ray states.
YES
BH: HIGH/SOFT-------------
NS: BS / FB
BH: LOW/HARD------------ NS: IS / HB
new compressionof the
magnetic lines
reconnection
BH: VERY HIGH----------- NS: NB
stored magneticenergy released
untwistedB
no JETis formed
two spinning plasma flows
a JETis formed
QUIESCENT
NO BTwisted?
Neutron Star:X-ray Pulsar
increaseM
increaseM
PB > Pp
Cycle B
START
JET FORMATION PB < Pp
Magnetic Field Upper Limit
Alfvén Radius
The Basic Condition
The distance at which the magnetic and plasma pressure balance each other.
BH Last Stable Orbit
RA / RLSO = 1
RA / R* = 1
NS Surface Radius
Using observed values of B and M
for NS XRBs,
Classical X-ray Pulsarsms X-ray PulsarsAtoll SourcesZ sources
Upper Limit for B
Z sources
Atoll Sources
ms X-ray Pulsars
108.2 G
107.7 G
107.5G
The association of a classical X-ray pulsar (B ~ 1012 G) with jets is excluded even if they accrete at the Eddington critical rate.
Theses theoretical values are in complete agreement with the up to now existing observational data:
The magnetic field strength has been determined in a Z-source,
with jets, Scorpius X-1, using magnetoacoustic oscillations in
kHz QPO reaching values of 107-8 G (Titarchuk et al. 2001)
Millisecond X-ray pulsar could switch to a microquasar phase during maximum accretion rate.In fact, in the millisecond source SAX J1808.4-3658 (which shows hints for a radio jet) the upper limit of the magnetic field strength was found to be a few times 107 G (Gilfanov et al. 1998).
Classical X-ray pulsar: in agreement with the systematic search of
radio emission in this kind of sources with so far negative result
(Fender et al. 1997; Fender & Hendry 2000; Migliari & Fender 2006)
Schwarzschild Stellar Mass BH Kerr Stellar Mass BH
Schwarzschild and Kerr Supermassive BHs Upper Limit for B with Eddington mass accretion rate
Stellar-Mass BHSchw
Stellar-Mass BHKerr
Supermassive BH
1.35 x 108 G
5 x 108 G
105.9 G
For a BH of the same mass Blandford & Payne (1982) established B < 104 G at 10rg.
Scaling our value, which is relative to LSO=6rg, to 10rg we get
B < 104 G in complete agreement with the results of
Blandford & Payne (1982).
Note: in the specific case of a supermassive Schwarzschild BH of
108 we get B < 104.3 G.
The analysis of the basic condition for jet formation presented here has as well some important implications.
astro-ph/0709.4287(A&A, in press)
Some Atoll sources have been detected in radio (Fender &
Hendry 2000; Rupen et al. 2005) and recently evidence for a
JET has been found in some of them (Migliari et al. 2006,
Russell et al. 2007).