sep 1996r-41 troi engineering data transmittal of/67531/metadc688287/m2/1/high... · engineering...

O f 1 I ~ E D T 618855

SEP 1996r-41 ENGINEERING DATA TRANSMITTAL 37 trOI

2. TO: (Receiving Organization) Distribution

5. Proj./Prog./Dept./Div.:

WHC TWRS Disposal

3. Frun: (Or ig inat ing Organization) 4 . Related EDT No.: WHC TWRS Disposal Engineering 606379 R. J. Parazin 6. Cognizant Engr.: 7. Purchase Order No.:

R. J. Parazin N /A Enqi neeri nq I 8. O r i g i n a t o r R m r k s :

The attached Design Requirements Document is issued for approval and re1 ease.

9. Equip./Conponent No.:

10. System/Bldg./Facility: N/A

11. Receiver Remarks: 11A. Design Basel ine Document? [ ] YNI [ X I NO

I 17. SiQNATURElDiSTFllBUTiON

I S m Appmval Designator lor required signature.)

N/A 12. n a i o r *Sun. Dug. NO.: 13. Pern i t /Penni t A w l i c e t i o n No.: 1 4 . Required Response Date:

Originator 10, Receiving 0qaniZ.tiin I

15. DATA TRANSMITTED

'Om 10) Documantlorawing NO. Shoot ID' IAl IC1

NO. NO. NO. IEI Title or Dsscriptlon of Data

Transminsd

0 TURS P r i v a t i z a t i o n Phase 1 L i q u i d E f f l u e n t Transfer S i s . Design R e q d i r e n t s DOC

1 WHC-SD-WM-DRD-014

._

80-7400-1 72-1

( F ) (G) ( H ) (1) APPIOV~ Reaeon 0"gi. R e i r

for n a t ~ r ~, nlor Trans- Oispo- Dispo-

mittal mition mition

N/A lP3

Approval Dosignator IF1 E. S. (1. D or NIA ISM WHC-CM-3-6. Sec.12.7l

Reason for Tranmdttal IGI Oirpdtion IHI Ill 4. Fbviewsd nolcommnt 1. Approval 4. Review 1. Approved

2. Relaass 6. Post-Rs-w 2. Appmvod wkommsnt 6. Reviewed wlmmmsnt 3. Inlormation 6. Dist. IReWiPt Acknow. Requiredl 3. Disapproved wkomment 0. Receipt acknowbdgad

R

WHC-SD-WM-DRD-014 Revision 0

DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT

PRIVATIZATION PHASE I

LIQUID EFFLUENT TRANSFER SYSTEMS

prepared by ICF Kaiser Hanford Company for Westinghouse Hanford Company

SEPTEMBER 1996

Prepared by: A - R I , P& A.N. Palit, ICF KH/TFRSO Piping Engineer

Concurrence: W Q. J.a.-yicholson, ICF KHlTFRSO Piping Lead Engineer

C o n c u r r e n c e : p 8 M.D. Rickenbach, ICF KH/TFRSO Principal Lead Engineer

C o n c u r r e n c e : B . / U b x 7. l t ”~? J.T. Koberg, ICF KH/TFRSO Project Manager

913.1 96 Date

WHC-SD-WM-DRD-014, Rev. 0 8

TWRS PRIVATIZATION PHASE 1 LIQUID EFFLUENT TRANSFER SYSTEMS DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT

R. J . Paraz in Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, WA 99352 U.S. Department o f Energy Contract DE-AC06-87RL10930

EDT/ECN: 618855 UC: 721 Org Code: 73520 Charge Code: D627F B&R Code: EW3130000 To ta l Pages: 38

Key Words: TWRS P r i v a t i z a t i o n , Phase 1, l i q u i d e f f l u e n t t r a n s f e r , p r i v a t i z a t i o n , p r i v a t i z a t i o n con t rac to r , e f f l u e n t t reatment , 1 i q u i d e f f l u e n t des ign requirements, DRD

Abs t rac t : The DOE-RL i s pursu ing a new business s t r a t e g y o f h i r i n g p r i v a t e c o n t r a c t o r s f o r t reatment o f Hanford tank waste. Th is ' p r i v a t i z a t i o n ' i n i t i a t i v e i nc ludes design, p e r m i t t i n g , cons t ruc t i on , operat ions, d e a c t i v a t i o n and decommissioning o f t ank waste t reatment f a c i l i t i e s . The TWRS P r i v a t i z a t i o n I n f r a s t r u c t u r e P r o j e c t i s p a r t o f t h e f i r s t phase o f t h e i n i t i a t i v e and inc ludes severa l sub-pro jects t o p rov ide key phys i ca l i n t e r f a c e s and se rv i ces needed t o suppor t t h e miss ion. One sub-pro ject i s t o p rov ide t r a n s f e r systems i n t e g r a t e d w i t h 200 Area l i q u i d e f f l u e n t f a c i l i t i e s t o s e r v i c e t h e p r i v a t e con t rac to rs . Th i s document presents t h e a p p l i c a b l e l i q u i d e f f l u e n t t r a n s f e r systems' des ign requi rements t o be used as a bas i s f o r conceptual design.

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. t rade name, trademark, manufacturer, o r otheruise, does not necessar i ly c o n s t i t u t e o r i n p l y i t s endorsement, r e c m n d a t i o n , o r favor ing by the Uni ted States C o v e r m n t o r any agemy thereof o r i t s con t rac to rs o r subcontractors.

Reference he re in t o any s p e c i f i c c m r c i a l product, process, o r se rv i ce by

Pr in ted i n the Uni ted States Docunent Contro l Services, P Fax (509) 376-4989.

of .o.

America. Box 1970,

To ob ta in copies o f t h i s d o c w n t , contact: UHCIBCS MaiLstop H6-08. Richland UA 99352, Phone (509) 372-2420;

Approved for Public Release

A-6400-073 (10195) GEF321

WHC-BD-WM-DRD-014 Revision 0

DESIGN REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT

FOR

PRIVATIZATION PHASE I

LIQUID EFFLUENT TRANSFER SYSTEMS

SEPTEMBER 1996

Prepared for

U. S. Department of Energy Richland Field Office Richland, Washington

Westinghouse Hanford Company Richland, Washington 99352

11


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 .O SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 IDENTIFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 SYSTEMOVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.3 DOCUMENT OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.1 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.2 NON-GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . 5

3.0 SYSTEM FUNCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1 DEFINITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2 CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

3.2.1 PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.2.2 SYSTEM RELATIONSHIPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 0 3.2.3 EXTERNAL INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 0 3.2.4 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4 3.2.5 SYSTEM QUALITY FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4 3.2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.2.7 TRANSPORTABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.8 FLEXIBILITY AND EXPANSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.9 PORTABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

3.3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 3.3.1 MATERIALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 3.3.2 ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3.3.3 NAMEPLATES AND PRODUCT MARKINGS . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3.3.4 WORKMANSHIP . . . . . . . 18 3.3.5 INTERCHANGEABILITY . . . . . . . 3.3.6 SAFETY . . . . . . . . . . 18 3.3.7 HUMAN ENGINEERING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 3.3.8 NUCLEAR CONTROL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 3.3.9 SECURITY.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.3.10 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PRO USAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.3.1 1 COMPUTER RESOURCE RESERVE CAPACITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.3.1 2 PIPING AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT DESIGN AND

CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.4 DOCUMENTATION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.5 LOGISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 . . . . . . . . . 3.5.1 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION . . . . . . 21

3.5.2 WASTE HANDLING, STORAGE, AND DISPOS . . . . . . 22 3.5.3 TRANSPORTATION . . . . 22 3.5.4 SUPPLYISUPPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

... 111

WHC-SO-WM-DRO-014 Revision 0

3.6 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 3.6.1 PERSONNEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 3.6.2 TRAINING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

3.7 CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBORDINATE ELEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.8 PRECEDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.9 QUALIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.1 0 STANDARD SAMPLE . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

OR PILOT LOT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 4.1 RESPONSIBILITY FOR INSPECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 4.2 SPECIAL TESTS AND EXAMINATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 4.3 REQUIREMENTS CROSS REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . 3.1 1 PREPRODUCTION SAMPLE, PERIOD1 ION SAMPLE, PILOT

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.0 PREPARATION FOR DELIVERY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.0 NOTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1 INTENDEDUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.1 Missions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1.2 Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.1 RADIOACTIVE, DANGEROUS LIQUID EFFLUENT . . . . . . . 31 6.2.2 NON-RADIOACTIVE, NON-DANGEROUS LIQUID EFFLUENT . . . . 31

6.3 ABBREVIATIONSAND ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

7.0 APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

6.2 DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

iv

WHC-SO-WM-DRD-014 Revision 0

TABLES

Table 4.3-1 Requirements Cross Reference . . . . . . . . . . 25

FIGURES

Figure 3.1-1 Non.Radioactive. Non-Dangerous Liquid Effluent System Architecture . . . 7 Figure 3.1-2 Radioactive. Dangerous Liquid Effluent System Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Figure 3.2-1 NomRadioactive. Non-Dangerous Liquid Effluent Transfer System . . . . . 1 2 Figure 3.2-2 Radioactive. Dangerous Liquid Effluent Transfer System . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3

WHC-SO-WM-ORO-014 Revision 0

1 .O SCOPE

1 .I IDENTIFICATION

Program: Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS)

Project: TWRS Privatization Infrastructure Project (IP)

Systems: Non-Radioactive, Non-Dangerous Liquid Effluent Radioactive, Dangerous Liquid Effluent

1.2 SYSTEM OVERVIEW

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Richland Operations Office, is pursuing a new business strategy of hiring private contractors (PC) for treatment of Hanford Site tank wastes. This strategy, called privatization, includes design, permitting, construction, operation, and deactivation of equipment and facilities for treatment of tank wastes. The Phase I of the privatization includes supernatant pretreatment, low level waste (LLW) immobilization, and an optional high-level waste (HLW) immobilization. The TWRS Privatization Infrastructure Project (IP) is a part of the first phase of the privatization initiative. The IP consists of several sub-projects which will provide key physical interfaces and services needed to support the privatization mission. The liquid effluent transfer is one of the sub-projects.

During Phase I the Double Shell Tank (DST) supernate would be provided t o t w o private contractors for pretreatment and immobilization into a low-activity waste (LAW) product from June 2002 through June 2007. The PC facilities may run through 201 1 if extended by DOE. The DOE or its agent, the Project Hanford Management Contractor (PHMC) is responsible for accepting liquid effluent from boundary of the PC facilities for disposal at the 200 Area liquid effluent disposal facilities.

1.3 DOCUMENT OVERVIEW

This document sets forth functional requirements, performance requirements, interface requirements, and design constraints for the liquid effluent transfer systems identified in Section 3.1. These requirements and constraints will be used t o develop the Design Requirements Baseline for the liquid effluent transfer systems.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The following documents of the exact issue shown form a part of the requirements of this Design Requirements Documents (DRD) t o the extent specified herein. In the

1


event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this DRD, due t o subsequent compliance document interpretations or revisions, the requirements of this DRD shall be considered a superseding requirement until required DRD changes are instituted through the formal change control process.

2.1 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

SPECIFICATIONS:

1 0 CFR 835

29 CFR 191 0

40 CFR 6 1

40 CFR 262

40 CFR 268

60FR31115

DOEIRL, 5400.xy

DOEIRL, 5400.1

DOE/RL-90-43

DOE 1540.1

DOE 5400.5

DOE 5480.4

DOE 5480.7A

DOE 5480.1 9

DOE 5480.20A

DOE 5480.23

Department of Energy Occupational Radiation Protection

Occupational Safety and Health Standards

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants - 1994

Hazardous Waste Management

Land Disposal Restrictions

EPA Approval of Delisting Petition, DOE/RL-92-72

Radiation Effluent Monitoring and Environmental Surveillance

General Environmental Protection Program

LERF Part B Permit Application

Materials Transportation and Traffic Management

Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment (1 990a)

Environmental Protection, Safety and Health Protection (1 993)

Fire Protection (1 993)

Conduct of Operations Requirements for DOE Facilities (DOE 1990)

Personnel Selection, Qualification, Training, and Staffing Requirements at DOE Reactor and Non-Reactor Facilities

Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports

2

WHC-SD-WM-DRO-014 Revision 0

DOE 5700.6C

DOE 5820.2A

DOE 6430.1A

Quality Assurance (DOE 1991)

Radioactive Waste Management

United States Department of Energy, General Design Criteria (DOE 1989)

DE-RP06-96RL13308

STANDARDS:

MIL-STD-14721)

TWRS Privatization Request for Proposals (RFP)

Human Engineering Design Criteria for Military Systems Equipment and Facilities

DRAWINGS:

NIA

OTHER PUBLICATIONS:

GC-LOAD-01

GG-DWG-01

HSRCM-I

NUREG 0 7 0 0

NUREG CR-2496

UCRL 15673

WHC-CM-2-14

WHC-CM-3-5

WHC-CM-4-3

WHC-CM-4-40

Standard (RL 1993)

AIE General Standard

Hanford Site Radiological Control Manual

Guidelines for Control Design Reviews

ch-Civil Design Criteria, Design Loa r Facilities

Human Engineering Design Considerations for Cathode Ray Generated Displays

Human Factors Design Guidelines for Maintainability of DOE Nuclear Facilities

Hazardous Material Packaging and Shipping

Document Control and Records Management Manual

Industrial Safety Manual

Industrial Hygiene Manual

3

W H C-C M-4-4 6

WHC-CM-6-3

WHC-CM-7-5

WHC-EP-0063-4

WHC-IP-1 140

WHC-IP-1043


Non-Reactor Facility Safety Analysis Manual

Drafting Standards Manual

Environmental Compliance

Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria

Workmanship Standards

WHC Occupational ALARA Program

WHC-SD-GN-DGS-30008 Design loads for New Underground DSTs and Associated Underground Process Piping

WHC-SD-GN-DGS-30011 Radiological Design Guide

WHC-SD-WM-DRD-013 Design Requirements Document for Privatization Phase I, Roads & Rail System Modifications & Site Development

200 Area Treated effluent disposal Facility Interface WHC-SD-W049H-ICD-001

WHC-SD-ETF-WAC-00 1

WHC-SD-W 1 05-SAR-00 1

WHC-SD-TWR-ES-002

WHC-SD-WM-ES-396

WHC-SD-WM-FRD-020

WAC-1 73-200

WAC 173-216

WAC 173-303

Permit No. ST4500

Control Document

Acceptance of Feed Streams for Treatment at the LERF/ETF complex

Liquid Effluent Retention Facility FSAR

Engineering Study, TWRS Privatization Phase I, Raw and potable water Service (Draft)

Engineering Study, Privatization Phase I, Liquid Effluent Transfer Systems (Draft)

TWRS Functions and Requirements Document

Water Quality Standards for Ground Waters of State of Washington

State Waste Discharge Permit Program

Dangerous Waste Regulations

State Waste Discharge Permit

4


Permit No. ST4502 State Waste Discharge Permit

2.2 NON-GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

DRAWINGS:

H-2.140342, Rev. 2

H-2-79604, Rev. 2

Civil Line H STA 0 + 00 t o STA 3 2 + 23

Piping Plot and Key Plans 242-A Evap Cond Stream

SPECIFICATIONS:

N I A

STANDARDS:

ANSIIANS-3.2-88 Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants

ASME-NQA-1-1989-1 A Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Facilities (1 986)

NFPA 70 National Fire Protection Association, National Electric Code (1 993)

5


3.0 SYSTEM FUNCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

3.1 DEFINITION

The primary function of the liquid effluent transfer system is to support transfer of the effluents from the PCs' site boundaries t o the 200 Area liquid effluent disposal facilities as follows:

Liquid effluents which meet interface acceptance criteria for discharge directly t o the 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility (TEDF). Figure 3.1- 1 depicts the architecture required to accomplish the effluent transfer.

Liquid effluents which require treatment and meet interface acceptance criteria for discharge directly t o the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) and subsequent treatment in the Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). Figure 3.1-2 depicts the architecture required t o accomplish the effluent transfer.

0

The major sub-elements that makeup a liquid effluent transfer system are briefly described below:

a. Piping system. The effluent transfer piping system consisting of primary pipe for non-radioactive, non-dangerous effluents or double-contained pipe for radioactive, dangerous effluents used t o route the effluent liquid, flanges, couplings and other ancillary equipment (e.g., fittings, valves).

b. Transfer pumps. The effluent transfer mechanism required t o provide motive force t o move liquid effluent from source location in the PC facility t o the destination at the disposal site.

c. Instrumentation and control system. The effluent transfer instrumentation and control system consisting of the controls, monitoring devices, instrumentation devices and cabling required to properly supervise and operate the effluent transfer.

d. Power system. The effluent transfer power system consists of transformers, load centers, motor control centers, distribution boxes, power cabling, and associated ancillary equipment for items requiring electrical power.

6

WHC-SD-WM-DRD-014 Revision 0 ..

Figure 3.1 -1 Non-Radioactive, Non-Dangerous Liquid Effluent System Architecture

7

STORAGE STATION LOPTIONALI

L LOAD OUT STATION

FACILITY it 1

STORAGE STATION (OPTIONAL1

LOA0 OUT STATION FACILITY it 2

PRIVATIZATION - CONTRACTORS ~

- P I P I N G SYSTEM

OPERATIONS

L c

TWRS PRIVATIZATION

INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT

GD -EFFLUENT) RETENTION FACILIT IES

CONDENSATE L I N E FROM 242-A EVAPORATOR

- 200 EAST AREA DISPOSAL FACILITY


3.2 CHARACTERISTICS

3.2.1 PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS

The system components shall meet the following performance characteristics specified within this document.

3.2.1.1

3.2.1.2

3.2.1.3

3.2.1.4

3.2.1.5

3.2.1.6

Non-Radioactive, Non-Dangerous Effluent Discharge Flow Rate. The non- radioactive, non-dangerous effluent discharge f low rate from t w o contractors combined shall be 133,000 cubic meterdyear I35 Mgallyear) maximum. The rate is a bounding figure acknowledged both by the bidding PCs and DOE-RL during phase 1A negotiations. The postulated volume is subject t o further negotiation before the definitive design stage (RFP volume 300,000 cubic meterslyear).

Radioactive, Dangerous Effluent Discharge Flow Rate. The radioactive, dangerous effluent discharge f low rate from t w o contractors combined shall be 100,000 cubic meterdyear (26 MgaVyear) maximum (RFP volume 100,000 cubic meters/year).

Minimum Liquid Velocity. The piping system, for both types of effluents mentioned under section 3.1, shall be provided for collection and disposal of effluent liquid from the PC facilities and installed with a slope for gravity draining. The minimum liquid velocity of 61 centimeters (2 feet1 per second at the average rate of f low shall be maintained.

Motive Force. The PC, for each type of effluent mentioned under section 3.1, shall connect its facility t o the tie-in provided for the effluent transfer at the PC's site perimeter. The effluent transfer mechanism at the PC facility shall provide motive force to move liquid effluent from the source t o the destination.

Monitoring Effluent Stream Parameters. The contractor generating facility will monitor each type of effluent mentioned under section 3.1 for f low and applicable process upset on a real-time and historical basis and indicating parameters such as pH, conductivity, total alpha, and total beta. Monitoring system will initiate automated corrective actions, as appropriate, t o protect the integrity of both the disposal facility and discharged effluent.

Radioactive, Dangerous Effluent Waste Acceptability Criteria. The waste acceptability criteria for storage and treatment at LERF/ETF have not been determined at this time. Only the waste codes listed under Fool through F005 in the Delisting Petition can be accepted currently for treatment at the ETF. However the following operability parameters can be assumed as the starting point for the definitive design stage:

9


a. Single phase aqueous waste streams containing no separable organics. b. Minimize colloidal matter to protect filters in the ETF from plugging. c. Minimize scale forming compounds concentrations within limitations of the

Ultra Violet/oxidation and Reverse Osmosis units. d. Minimize concentrations of corrosive constituent, such as chloride and

fluoride. e. Minimize concentration of constituents that can absorb ultra-violet light t o

the extent destruction of targeted organics is significantly compromised. f . Waste streams containing no solids which rnay settle in the LERF basins. g. The concentration of ammonia limited t o 1 w t % (10.000 mg/L or 5 8 MI.

Non-Radioactive, Non-Dangerous Effluent Acceptance Criteria. The effluent must meet the 200 Area TEDF Waste Acceptance Criteria (WHC-SD-W049H-

3.2.1.7

ICD-0011.

3.2.2 SYSTEM RELATIONSHIPS

Relationships between the functions performed by the effluent transfer systems and other, interfacing system functions cannot be identified at this time.

3.2.3 EXTERNAL INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS

3.2.3.1 Physical Descriptions. The physical interfaces described herein are based on the recommended routing of the underground effluent transfer piping (WHC- SD-WM-ES-396) and these interfaces are depicted in Figure 3.2-1 and -2. Additional scope and modification of the contents of this section rnay be required based on the results of the Baseline Comparison.

Buried pipelines will be used t o transfer liquid effluents from PC facilities to the disposal sites. The effluent tie-in points for both the PC facilities will be located east of the grout vaults approximately between the coordinates N.39550/N.41400and W.44950/W.43600. Each PC will discharge t w o fluid streams: Non-Radioactive Non-Dangerous Liquid Effluent and Radioactive, Dangerous Liquid Effluent. The privatization contractors shall not commingle different waste types.

Non-Radioactive Non-Dangerous Liquid Effluent. The proposed common route begins at coordinates W43650 and N41430 east of the PC facilities and runs straight west upto W45000. The route then turns north along the proposed interior road east of the PC facilities up t o the proposed north asphalt concrete pavement (ACP) road for the privatization phase I stage (WHC-SD- TWR-ES-002, Alternative 6). The route continues west along the north ACP road and tie-in wi th the corresponding existing disposal line suitable for the type of the effluent. The effluent pipeline will tie-in to the H LINE (Drawing H-2-140342) at N41050. The routing configuration is shown in Figure 3.2-1.

3.2.3.2

1 0

3.2.3.3


Radioactive, Dangerous Liquid Effluent. The radioactive, dangerous liquid effluent pipeline will run parallel to non-radioactive non-dangerous liquid effluent and tie-in to the existing 242-A Evaporator condensate discharge line PC5000 (Drawing H-2-79604) at N41050. The routing configuration is shown in Figure 3.2-2.

11

TREATED EFFLUENT DISPOSAL F A C I L I T Y

(TEDF)

EXISTING L I N E PROPOSED NEW L I N E

- -___-

WHC-SD-WM-DRD-014 Revision 0 ,_

I f

Figure 3.2-2 Radioactive,Dangerous Liquid Effluent Transfer System

13


3.2.4 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

The transfer system components and piping shall be constructed of materials that are compatible wi th the effluent t o be placed in the primary system and must have sufficient strength and thickness t o prevent failure owing to physical contact wi th the effluent t o which it is exposed, climatic conditions, and the stress of daily operation (including stresses from nearby vehicular traffic) to meet the reliability requirements outlined in Section 3.2.5.1.

3.2.4.1 Protective Coatings

This paragraph is not applicable to this specification.

3.2.5 SYSTEM QUALITY FACTORS

3.2.5.1

3.2.5.1.1

3.2.5.1.2

3.2.5.2

3.2.5.2.1

3.2.5.2.2

Reliability The degree of redundancy, reliability, and availability shall correspond to a systematically determined safety classification for all systems, structures, and components. An approved reliability Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) analysis shall be performed for the designed system.

Design Life The effluent transfer system shall be designed for a service life of 15 years.

Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) Requirements cannot be identified at this time.

Maintainability. The design of equipment shall incorporate the objective of efficient maintainability. The surveillance, testing, and maintenance of a system and its restoration to operational effectiveness shall be achieved at minimum cost wi th a minimum level of support services. Maintenance, inspection, and testing capabilities shall be incorporated where required in the design in accordance wi th DOE Order 6430.1A4, section 1300-3.5.

Accessibility. The system design shall consider the maintainability factors peculiar to the specific equipment t o be used in the facility. Facility design shall provide for routine maintenance, repair, or replacement of equipment subject to failure. Ancillary equipment shall be located in areas least likely t o be contaminated.

Testing. The design shall include provisions for periodic testing of piping, monitoring, surveillance, and alarm systems. In addition, the design shall provide the capability to test periodically, under simulated emergency conditions, safety class items that are required t o function under emergency conditions. Safety class systems shall be in place testable in terms of

14


pressure, filtration or removal efficiency, alarm capability, leak resistance, and the like. Safety class items shall be designed to be testable on a regular schedule.

Shielding. Where permanent shielding is impractical and operational or maintenance access is required, the distance between radioactive components shall be designed t o permit installation of temporary shielding around items that contribute substantially to the dose rate.

Future Use. Facilities or modifications t o facilities shall be designed such that, at the end of the facility's design life, exposures during surplus facility maintenance, surveillance, and decontamination or decommissioning activities shall be As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) (WHC-IP- 10431.

3.2.5.2.3

3.2.5.2.4

3.2.5.2.5

3.2.5.3

3.2.5.4

Mean Time to Repair (MTTR). Requirements cannot be identified at this time,

Availability. The effluent transfer system shall be available to perform transfers throughout its design life.

Additional Quality Factors

This paragraph is not applicable t o this specification.

3.2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.

The Effluent Transfer System shall be designed t o withstand the environmental conditions specified below while performing to the requirements specified in 3.2.1.

3.2.6.1 External -Weather Related. The effluent transfer system shall be designed t o withstand the natural environments of the Hanford Site listed below. Thermal effects of the soil shall also be considered for the buried portions of the system.

Temperatures: Maximum temperature: 48.9OC (1 20OF) Minimum Temperature: -35.5OC(-32OF) Rate of increase: 28.9OC (52OF) per 2 4 hours, maximum pH Range 2.0 - 12.5

Relative Humidity: The system shall be designed t o operate within a relative humidity range of 0 to 1 0 0 %

PreciDitation:

15

WHC-SD-WM-DRO-014 Revision 0

The system shall be designed to withstand a 25 year, 24 hour mean precipitation of 4 c m (1.56 in).

Blowing Dust and Smoke: The system shall be designed to withstand periods of blowing dust and smoke with the following characteristics: Visibility:

Frequency: Duration: 24 hrs. per occurrence

External - Natural Induced Forces. All Effluent Transfer System safety class components shall comply wi th the design loads for nonreactor structures specified in "Hanford A/E Standards, Architectural/Civil, GC-LOAD-01, Design Loads for Facilities".

Internal - Radionuclide. The Effluent Transfer System elements shall be capable of withstanding the worst case liquid waste radionuclide concentrations acceptable for treatment at the ETF.

9.65 km (6 miles) or less with sky completely obscured 1 0 times per year, maximum

3.2.6.2

3.2.6.3

3.2.6.4 Internal - Effluent Chemical Characteristics. The Effluent Transfer System elements shall be capable of withstanding the liquid waste chemical composition ranges acceptable for treatment at the TEDF or ETF.

Internal - Pressure. Effluent Transfer System elements shall withstand the maximum pressure developed at the PC facility and required to move the effluent from the PC facility to the disposal facility.

3.2.6.5

3.2.7 TRANSPORTABILITY.

The effluent transfer system elements shall be designed t o be handled, packaged, marked and transported in accordance wi th DOE Order 1540.1, "Materials Transportation and Traffic Management" to assure materials reach destination in good order.

3.2.8 FLEXIBILITY AND EXPANSION.

The system shall incorporate a design that addresses anticipated future needs. Changeable, movable and demountable material shall be considered where functional requirements are likely t o change. Design solutions shall demonstrate methods for modification and expansion including modularity, additional capacities (unless otherwise restricted in other sections of these criteria), and other techniques when justified on a Life Cycle Cost (LCC) basis.

1 6


3.2.9 PORTABILITY.


3.3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

The system shall be designed and constructed in accordance wi th DOE Order 6430.1 A, General Design Criteria. The criteria in Sections 99.0, "Non-Nuclear Facilities - General", Section 99.17, "Radioactive Liquid Waste Facilities" and Section 1300 "Special Facilities" are applicable.

3.3.1 MATERIALS.

3.3.1.1

3.3.1.2

3.3.1.2.1

3.3.1.3

3.3.1.3.1

3.3.1.4

3.3.1.4.1

3.3.1.5

Toxic Products and Formulations. The effluent transfer system shall be designed without components or hardware which uses asbestos, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), or ozone depleting chemicals.

Secondary Containment. All waste bearing elements of the radioactive, dangerous effluent transfer system shall be doubly contained.

Materials. The secondary containment system shall be constructed of materials that are compatible wi th the effluent t o be transferred.

Underground Pipe.

Backfill Material. The effluent transfer system components that are placed underground and backfilled shall be provided wi th a backfill material that is a noncorrosive, porous, homogeneous substance and that is installed so that the backfill is placed completely around the system and compacted t o ensure that the buried system is fully and uniformly supported.

Decontamination and Decommissioning. The effluent transfer system and its components shall be designed to facilitate decontamination for maintenance and operations, and t o simplify decontamination and decommissioning and/or increase the ootential for reuse.

Hazardous Materials Handling. The effluent transfer system elements shall be designed t o be handled, packaged, marked and transported in accordance wi th WHC-CM-2-14 "Hazardous Materials Packaging and Shipping" so that transfer system elements can be appropriately transported following usage (e.g., t o maintenance depots, to deactivation facilities at the end of their design life, etc.).

Smooth Surfaces. All surfaces that are potentially susceptible t o exposure to contamination shall be designed t o have a smooth, non-porous, surface finish

1 7


which is free of cracks, crevices, and sharp corners.

3.3.1.6 Corrosion Protection. The Effluent Transfer System shall implement corrosion protection t o achieve the design life specified in 3.2.5.1.1. This shall be accomplished through the use of corrosion resistant materials for Effluent Transfer System elements in contact wi th the corrosive environmental conditions specified in section 3.2.6. In addition, dissimilar metals and soil shall be considered and corrosion protection system implemented where needed.

3.3.2 ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION.


3.3.3 NAMEPLATES AND PRODUCT MARKINGS.

Specific guidelines for addressing labeling shall be followed and are contained in NUREG 0700, Section 6.6, MIL-STD-l472D, Section 5.5 and the DOE Order for Conduct of Operations, DOE 5480.19, Chapter 18, Equipment Piping and Labeling.

Equipment Labeling. Equipment and any parts of that equipment t o be used by personnel shall be identified wi th appropriate labels. The label shall indicate clearly and concisely the function and purpose of the item being labeled.

Durability. Permanent labels shall be attached t o the specific component or equipment in such a manner that environmental conditions or usage by personnel will not remove or destroy the label.

Legibility. Labeling shall be legible and conform to human visual capabilities and limitations in regard t o physical characteristics such as letter and symbol size, contrast, font, simplicity, spacing and stroke width.

3.3.3.1

3.3.3.2

3.3.3.3

3.3.4 WORKMANSHIP

The effluent transfer system elements shall conform t o the workmanship standards specified in WHC-IP-1 140, "Workmanship Standards".

3.3.5 INTERCHANGEABILITY.

This paragraph is not applicable to this specification

3.3.6 SAFETY.

It is the policy of the Project Hanford Management Contractor t o assure that all

1 8


activities are strictly controlled, from design, t o operation and maintenance, all components, systems, and processes must meet safety and environmental requirements. Requirements and standards outlined in DOE 5480.4, Environmental Protection, Safety and Health Protection, applicable to system design shall be incorporated for safety.

3.3.6.

3.3.6.

3.3.6.1

3.3.6.1.1

3.3.6.1 .I .I

.I .2

.I .3

a.

b.

C.

d.

e. f .

9.

3.3.6.1.1.4

Personnel Safety.

Radiological Safety. The design shall minimize exposures of personnel and the general public t o hazardous materials by emphasizing ALARA concern during all design, construction, and operational phases.

General Public Dose Limit. The system shall be designed such that exposure of members of the public t o radiation sources as a consequence of all routine DOE activities, including transfer activities, shall not cause, in a year, an effective dose equivalent greater than 1 rnSv (100 mrem).

Occupational Worker. The dose rates for the occupational worker shall not exceed the dose rate specified in Section 3.3.6.1.1.3.a.

Radiological Design. The effluent transfer system design shall follow the general design criteria contained in 1 0 CFR 835, DOE Order 6430.1 A and WHC-SD-GN-DGS-30011 and shall incorporate the following into the design:

Individual worker dose shall be ALARA and should be less than 5 rnSv (500 mrem) per year Discharges of radioactive liquid t o the environment are covered by the provisions of DOE 5400.5 and should not degrade the groundwater. Control of contamination should be achieved by containment of radioactive material Efficiency of maintenance, decontamination, operations, and decommissioning shall be maximized. Components should be selected t o minimize the buildup of radioactivity. Support facilities shall be provided for donning and removal of protective clothing and for personnel monitoring, when required. Neutron quality factor of 20 for conditions of unknown spectra (or doubling of the neutron quality factor associated wi th known neutron energies) should be used for design purposes. Design analyses based on these neutron quality factors are intended t o be used to estimate the additional construction cost that would result if the neutron quality factor was increased. The results of these analyses should be used t o ascertain the economic feasibility for incorporating such modifications in the final design.

Best Available Technology. For facility design, Radiation Protection

19


3.3.6.1.2

3.3.6.1.3

3.3.6.2

3.3.6.2.1

Equipment and hardware that impacts personnel or public radiation exposure shall meet Best Available Technology (BAT) criteria. BAT is the use of the most current proven state-of-the-art instrumentation, dosimetry and other hardware t o enhance and improve the radiation protection of personnel and the public wi th only a small weighing factor given to the economic impact,

Lock & Tag. The effluent transfer system shall be designed to accept lockout devices on components and systems t o protect against the unexpected release of all sources of hazardous energy or materials. Examples include, but are not limited to: electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, chemical, radiation, and thermal energies, as well as various forms of potential (stored) energy, such as in springs, compressed gases, or suspended objects.

Fire Protection. Fire protection provisions for the liquid effluent transfer system and its components shall comply wi th DOE 6430.1A, Section 1530 and DOE 5480.7A.

System Safety.

Interlocks. The transfer system shall be designed to secure and isolate a transfer of radioactive waste in the event of a system failure (i.e., primary containment failure).

3.3.7 HUMAN ENGINEERING.

Human Factors criteria documented in DOE 6430.1 A, Section 1300-1 2 shall apply t o the construction and operation of the effluent transfer system.

3.3.7.1 Human Dimension. Equipment that is to be used by personnel shall be designed or selected t o accommodate their body dimensions. This equipment includes control panels, work tables and counters, enclosures, seating, storage, special clothing, and any other equipment designed for an operator. The design of equipment for personnel shall accommodate a wide variety of body dimensions. Generally, it is recommended that equipment dimensions accommodate the f i f th t o ninety-fifth percentile of the user population. For recommended data representing these percentiles, see NUREG 0700, Section 6.1, and MIL-STD-l472D, Section 5.6.

3.3.8 NUCLEAR CONTROL


3.3.9 SECURITY.

20

WHC-SO-WM-ORD-014 Revision 0

Existing safeguards and security measures will not be impacted by the Effluent Transfer System or its operation. No new measures beyond current practices will be required for the effluent transfer system.

3.3.1 0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY USAGE.


3.3.1 1 COMPUTER RESOURCE RESERVE CAPACITY.


3.3.12 PIPING AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.

3.3.12.1 Placement. The secondary containment system shall be sloped to allow for drainage, accumulation, and removal of liquids resulting from leaks or spills.

3.3.12.2 Structural Support. The structural support design for the secondary containment systems must be at a minimum, placed on a foundation or base capable of providing support to the secondary containment system, resistance t o pressure gradients above and below the system, and capable of preventing failure due to settlement, compression, or uplift.

3.3.

3.3.

3.4

3.5

3.5.1

2.3 Containment. Ancillary equipment shall be provided wi th secondary containment (e.g., trench, jacketing, double-walled piping).

2.4 Physical Protection. The ancillary equipment shall be supported and protected against physical damage and excessive stress due t o settlement, vibration, expansion, or contraction.

DOCUMENTATION

Records, documents, and document control pertinent t o design functions shall be in accordance with WHC-CM-3-5. Drafting Standards for drawings shall be in accordance with ICF Kaiser Company’s A/E General Standards, GG-DWG-01, Revision 0. No requirements in accordance wi th any applicable state or federal regulations have not been identified at this time.

LOGISTICS

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION

Remote, limited, or contact maintenance and operation will be in accordance with the following threshold values. The requirements of hazardous materials and associated maintenance and operation considerations, if applicable, have not been

21

WHC-SO-WM-ORD-014 Revision 0

identified at this time.

3.5.1.1

3.5.1.2

3.5.1.3

Fully Remote Maintenance and Operation. Each system or portion of a system having radiation levels greater than 5 0 mrem/hr contact exposure will be designed t o be remotely maintained and operated or designed t o require no maintenance and be remotely operated.

Limited Contact Maintenance and Operation. Each system or portion of a system having radiation levels greater than 0.25 mrem/hr t o less than or equal to 5 0 mrem/hr will be designed for limited contact maintenance and operation. Designs shall consider remote removal of radiation sources and decontamination prior to personnel entry.

Full Contact Maintenance and Operation. Each system or portion of a system having radiation levels less than or equal t o 0.25 mrem/hr will be designed for full contact maintenance and operation.

3.5.2 WASTE HANDLING, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL

Solid waste handling, storage and disposal shall be performed in accordance with WHC-SD-GN-DGS-30011, Section 10.1 through 10.3 and WHC-CM-7-5, Section 7.0.

3.5.3 TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.


3.5.4 SUPPLYISUPPORT.

The system design shall, t o the greatest extent practicable, use readily available parts and components.

3.6 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING

3.6.1 PERSONNEL


3.6.2 TRAINING


3.7 CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBORDINATE ELEMENTS

Requirements cannot be identified at this time.

22


3.8 PRECEDENCE

This DRD documents the appropriate functions, requirements, interfaces, and architectures t o ensure that the identified mission of the liquid effluent transfer systems is: (a) adequately integrated into the overall TWRS mission and other projects; and (b) designed to the proper system level requirements. For the precedence of requirements contained herein, see the TWRS Systems Engineering requirements database (WHC-SD-WM-FRD-020, RDD-100) for their hierarchial relationships. Those requirements which are the closest to the "imposed" requirements in the hierarchy (e.g., CFRs, DOE Orders, etc.) shall carry precedence over those requirements several layers removed from the imposed requirement.

3.9 QUALIFICATION

See section 4.0.

3.10 STANDARD SAMPLE


PREPRODUCTION SAMPLE, PERIODIC PRODUCTION SAMPLE, PILOT OR PILOT LOT


3.1 1

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS

4.1 RESPONSIBILITY FOR INSPECTION

The design contractor shall be responsible for the performance of all inspections for each system developed in accordance wi th this DRD. Inspections shall be conducted at the contractor facilities or the facilities of his choice with the approval of the procuring authority. The procuring authority reserves the right t o witness or perform the specified inspections.

4.2 SPECIAL TESTS AND EXAMINATIONS

Any special tests and examinations required for sampling, lot formation, qualification evaluation, and any other tests or examinations as necessary shall be define within the design documents for the project.

4.3 REQUIREMENTS CROSS REFERENCE

23


Qualification shall be performed on system hardware representative of the approved production design. Qualification of the system t o assure compliance wi th the requirements of Section 3 shall be by examination, demonstration, test, and analysis, as defined below and shall be satisfied at the level of assembly specified in Table 4.3-1. Test program data may be used t o assure compliance with requirements. Definitions of examination, demonstration, test and analysis are as follows:

a.

b.

C.

d.

Examination. Examination is an element of inspection consisting of investigation, without the use of special laboratory appliances or procedures t o determine compliance wi th requirements.

Demonstration. Demonstration is an element of inspection that is limited t o readily observable functional operation t o determine compliance with requirements. This element of inspection does not require the use of special equipment or sophisticated instrumentation.

Test. Test is an element of inspection that employs technical means including (but not limited to) the evaluation of functional characteristics by use of special equipment or instrumentation, simulation techniques, and the application of established principles and procedures t o determine compliance wi th requirements. The analysis of data derived from test is an integral part of this inspection.

Analysis. Analysis is an element of inspection, taking the form of the processing of accumulated results and conclusions, intended t o provide proof that verification of a requirement(s1 has been accomplished. The analytical results may be comprised of a compilation of interpretation of existing information or derived from lower level examinations, tests, demonstrations, or analysis.

The environmental capability of equipment shall be demonstrated by appropriate testing, analysis, and operating experience, or other methods that can be supported by auditable documentation, or a combination of these methods.

Unless otherwise specified tests shall be made at standard ambient conditions.

24


Table 4.3-1 Requirements Cross Reference

TITLE INSPECT ELEMENT

SECTION 3 PARAGRAPH

NUMBER

3.2 I Characteristics

3.2.1 I Performance Characteristics

3.2.1.1 Non-Radioactive, Non-Dangerous Effluent Discharge Flow I Rate

3.2.1.6 Radioactive, Dangerous Effluent Waste Acceptability Criteria

3.2.1.7 Non-Radioactive, Non-Dangerous Effluent Acceptance Criteria

3.2.2 System Relationships

3.2.3 External Interface Requirements

3.2.3.1 Physical Descriptions

3.2.3.2 Non-Radioactive, Non-Dangerous Liquid Effluent

3.2.3.3 Radioactive, Dangerous Liquid Effluent

25


OF ASSEMBLY

26


3.3.1.4.1

3.3.1.5

3.3.1.6

TITLE SECTION 3

PARAGRAPH NUMBER

Hahardous Materials Handling

Smooth Surfaces

Corrosion Protection

3.2.6.3 I Internal - Radionuclide

3.2.6.4 I Internal - Effluent Chemical Characteristcs

3.2.6.5 I Internal - Pressure

3.2.7 I Transoortabilitv

3.2.8 I Flexibilitv and ExDansion

3.2.9 I Portabilitv

3.3 I Desian and Construction

3.3.1 I Materials

3.3.1.1 I Toxic Products and Formulations

3.3.1.2 I Secondarv Containment

3.3.1.2.1 I Materials

3.3.1.3 I Underground Pipe

3.3.1.3.1 I Backfill Material

3.3.1.4 I Decontamination and Decommissioning


OF ASSEMBLY

28

TITLE SECTION 3

PARAGRAPH NUMBER

3.3.6.2.1

3.3.7

3.3.7.1

3.3.8

3.3.9

3.3.10

3.3.1 1

3.3.12

3.3.1 2.1

3.3.1 2.2

3.3.12.3

3.3.12.4

3.4

3.5

3.5.1

INSPECT ELEMENT

1 3.5.1.2 29


OF ASSEMBLY

S = System, I = Intermediate, and C = Component

30


5.0 PREPARATION FOR DELIVERY


6.0 NOTES

6.1 INTENDED USE

The intended use of the liquid effluent transfer system is t o provide a means by which effluents can by transferred from the PC facilities and the 200 East Area effluent disoosal facilities as defined in Section 3.0 of this document.

6.1 .I Missions

The mission of the liquid effluent transfer system is described in section 3.1 wi th the performance characteristics outlined in section 3.2.

6.1.2 Hazards

Hazards associated wi th the liquid effluent transfer system and its design will be documented by the Safety Analysis Report for the system as defined by DOE 5480.23, Nuclear Safety Analysis Reports.

6.2 DEFINITIONS

6.2.1 RADIOACTIVE, DANGEROUS LIQUID EFFLUENT

Dilute process waste liquid effluents which require treatment and meet interface acceptance criteria for discharge directly, or wi th minimal pretreatment, to the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) and/or to the Effluent treatment Facility (ETF) for subsequent treatment in accordance wi th State Waste discharge Permit NO. ST-4500.

6.2.2 NON-RADIOACTIVE, NON-DANGEROUS LIQUID EFFLUENT

Uncontaminated waste water which meets interface acceptance criteria for discharge directly t o the 200 Area treated Effluent Disposal Facility (TEDF) as specified in State Waste discharge Permit No. ST-4502.

6.3 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

The acronyms and abbreviations listed below are used in this specification.

31


ACP ALARA BAT DOE DRD DST ETF

HLW IP LCC LERF LLW Mgal MTBF MTTR PC PCB PHMC RAM RCRA TEDF TWRS WAC WHC

gpm

Asphalt Concrete Pavement As Low As Reasonable Achievable Best Available Technology Department of Energy Design Requirements Document Double Shell Tank Effluent Treatment Facility gallon per minute High Level Waste Infrastructure Project Life Cycle Cost Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Low Level Waste million gallons Mean Time Between Failure Mean Time To Repair Privatization Contractor Polychlorinated Byphenyls Project Hanford Management Contractor Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability Resource Conservation and recovery Ac t Treated Effluent Disposal Facility Tank Waste Remediation System Washington Administrative Code Westinghouse Hanford Corporation

7.0 APPENDICES

The requirement of this section cannot be identified at this time.

32

To D i s t r i b u t i on

U.S. Deoartment o f Enerqy Richland Ooerations O f f i c e

E. M. Bowers N. R. Brown T. R. Hoertkorn (w. A. (RtWEerford R. B. Simmons-Green

ICF Ka iser Hanford ComDany

D. L. F o r t J. T. Koberg M. D. Rickenbach E. F. Yancey A. N. P a l i t

P a c i f i c Northwest Nat iona l Laboratory

B. A. Reynolds

Westinqhouse Hanford ComDany

R. U. E l w e l l P. F e l i s e J. S. G a r f i e l d K. A. Gasper M. N. Is lam(2) A. R. Johnson D. W. Lindsey S. S. Lowe P. C. M i l l e r

From Page 1 of 1 WHC TWRS Process Design Date 09/30/96 R. J. Parazin

Central F i l e s ( o r i g i n a l t 1)

Project TitleMlork Order TWRS P r i v a t i z a t i o n Phase I L i q u i d E f f l u e n t Trans fer Systems Design Requirements Document

s7-55 K6-51 84-55 A2-45 s7-53

63-12 63-12 63-12 63-10 63-12

P7-19

S7-12 84-55 H5-49 63-21 R3-08 H6-20 S6-71 H6-29 R1-51 H5-49

A3-88

EDT No. 618855

ECN No. N/A

X X X X X

X X X

X

X X X X X X X X X X

X

Name

X

Text Text Only Attach./ EDT/ECN MSlN With All Appendix Only

Attach. Only

A-6000-135 (01193) UEF067