semiotics: roland barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 fu … · ppt file · web...

29
Representation & Roland Barthes’ Sem iotics Structuralism (3)

Upload: phungkiet

Post on 05-Oct-2018

248 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Representation &Roland Barthes’ SemioticsStructuralism (3)

Page 2: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Outline 1. Representation

Representation and Production of Meaning Theories of Representation De Saussure Re-Considered: Contribution & Limitations

2. Semiotics: Major principles in semiotic readings Sign systems: fashion as an example Semiotic reading (1): denotation and connation Semiotic reading (2): first and second-order signification. (literal l

anguage and meta-language) Myth today defined

3. Examples: Images of Nature in some Landscape Paintings and Ads

Page 3: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

What is Representation?

Not Re-Presentation (原音重現,身歷其境 , 歷史現身 ) “Representation means using language to say som

ething meaningful about, or to represent, the world meaningfully, to people.” (15)

1. Using language (system of representation); 2. To produce meanings (another system of represen

tation) about (make connections among) things, and

3. To communicate them to some people.

Page 4: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

What are the two systems of representation we use in representation (meaning production)?1. Signs signifier (e.g. ‘love’ ‘I’)2. Conceptual System (pp. 17-18; e.g. love

‘romantic love,’ ‘puppy love,’ ’maternal love,’ etc.)

frequently inseparable from the signified of our languages;

Codes (pp. 21-22)

Page 5: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

What’s hidden in this stereogram

Conceptual System

Shapes formed because of 1) two-eye differences (wall-eyed; cross-eyed); 2) the gestalt laws of organization (e.g. figure and ground)

Page 6: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

What’s hidden in this stereogram

ANSWER: BUNNY!

http://www.billybear4kids.com/stereogram/bunny.html

Page 7: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

What’s this? What mental image (concept) does it correspond to?

Page 8: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Different Perspectives = Different Conceptual Systems

Page 9: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

1. Conceptual System = the Context of a sign, which determines its meaning

2. Sign system– image or English letters

Page 10: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Two Systems at Work in Representation: What kind of room is this?A restaurant or a tea house?

Signs: Red color, paper lantern, floor-to-ceiling windows, sofas, pillows, wood desk, ‘bamboo room,’ etc.

Page 11: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

What kind of room is this?

Page 12: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

The Lava Room

From Star Nightclub http://www.creamnyc.com/

Page 13: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Representation=Meaning Production

What makes the difference?

Different conceptual

frameworks, or

conceptual

systems.

Different Languages

Are these meanings absolute or relational? Why?

Page 14: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Meaning – Essential or Relational?

God Loves Me

I Teach/Contribute to Society

I Fuck/Produce Children

I Shop

I’m Happy

I Think

I AMI AMI AM

生命的意義在創造宇宙繼起的生命。

生活的意義在增進人類全體的生活﹔

1. “I” – no essence? 2. Meanings – one truer/better than the other? –produced by ourselves or a system?

* Note

Page 15: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Note: Relativism

Is there an essential definition of our selves? e. g. 生為中國 /劉家/輔大人,死為中國/劉家/輔大魂(鬼﹚。 Self(-Definition) –not essential nor unchangeable;

-- is relational (“I am A” implies “I am not B”). (i.e. binarist thinking may be at work.)

-- is usu. determined by our value systems, if not given to or imposed on us by our society.

-- can be contradictory, with so many conceptual systems we live in.

Relational view of meaning is not relativism. Relativism: Everything is ok and nothing matters.

Page 16: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Theories of Representation Reflective approach –

Some truth and functions to it (in communication, in knowledge acquisition)

Representation as “Re-Presentation” Intentional approach – Can we decide the meanings of

what we say? (p. 25) Representation as Self-Expression (得意而忘言;言止於心意深處 )

Constructivist approach – Things don’t mean; we construct meanings about them by usin

g different systems of representation. Representation as Construction: We don’t speak language; lan

guage speaks us. (Activity 4)

Page 17: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

De Saussure: Contribution & Limitations (pp. 32 – 35) Contributions to the Constructionist Theory of

Representation Arbitrary relations between signifier and signified Meanings in language can never be fixed; they are open to

changes by ‘context’ (historical, social or personal). Langue vs. parole the social part of language;

Limitations: too exclusive focus on language; Language is not a closed system. semiotics –the study

of signs (languages in a broader sense)

Page 18: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Semiotics & Roland Barthes

Page 19: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Major principles 1. All the cultural products and activities rea

d as process or results of signification. No meaning is inherent or natural.

2. There are more than one (arbitrary) relations between signifiers and signified.

(iconic --resemblance, indexical --cause, symbolic -- arbitrary).

3. There are more than one level of meanings. denotation and connotation.

Page 20: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

What kinds of signs are they?

Iconic

= airport

= Church

= crossroad

Symbolic

indexical

Page 21: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Sign System: Fashion as an Example Fashion codes (signs + concepts) (Textbook pp. 37-38) Fabric: Silk= feminine, denim= masculine,

casual, cotton = comfortable, khaki= military, formal.

skirt (+ silk)= feminine; jeans (+ cotton T-Shirt) =casual or masculine

Page 22: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Sign System: Rules of Selection and Combination All social practices as sign-systems and thus are

open to cultural interpretation (or de-mystification). e.g. the meaning of a jacket defined by its contexts. e.g. the “langue” of clothes (selection & combination)

System:a. blouse, shirt, T-shirt ;b. skirt, trousers

sentence: 1. blouse + skirt + high heeled shoes X snickers2. blouse + jeans + snickers X not for concert

Page 23: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Fashion and Myth: from denotation to connotation; description to prescription “. . . Mist gold, pure gold, and black gold are

all flashing in full glamour since most collections are heavily weighted toward evening cloths with an ostentatious dressing chic.

If gold is too much for you, don’t worry, for here comes the backup that makes you in style as well, the color of camel! As usual, camel has always been playing its role of warming up the winter, which has been so elegantly carried out by the blazing gold as it is this year. “ (Sophie Ko)

Page 24: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Fashion: from language to myth “Leather, of course, is something that can’t b

e left out in each winter.” “Fur, for sure, is a must, especially for collars, ”“As for trousers, they really do need to be slim-fi

tting and skinny-legged to be chic this season! ”

myth: 紫醉金迷、世紀末的華麗(Sophie Ko)

Page 25: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Semiotic reading (1): Denotation and Connotation

e.g. Panzani pasta1. Denotation: “the real objects in the scene”The signifiers: “these same objects photogra

phed.” 2. Connotation: “half-opened bag” spilling

out onto the table freshness, the domestic

3. Italianness (red green white)4. ‘a total culinary service” 5. Arrangement like “still life” painting

Page 26: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

a signifier + signified =

Semiotic reading (2): Different levels of signification: primary signification & secondary signification

primary signification:

Secondary signification

sign (full)--denotation

Sign (empty)/ Form+ content = sign --connotation

Page 27: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Signifier + signified =([home])

Semiotic reading (2): Different levels of signification: primary signification & secondary signification

primary signification:

Secondary signification

sign (full)--denotation

Sign (empty)/ Form+ content = sign --connotation: Homepage, country cottage, etc.

Barthes’ examples:

rose, black pebble.

Page 28: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

Signifier + signified =Young negro, in uniform, saluting,With eyes uplifted, fixed on the tricolor

Myth

primary signification:

Secondary signification

sign (full)—denotation([Black solider saluting

a French flag]) Patriotism/submission

Sign (empty)/ Form+ content = sign --connotation: France as a

Great empire, loved by all her “sons.”

colonialism militariness

Page 29: Semiotics: Roland Barthes - 輔仁大學英國語文學系 Fu … · PPT file · Web viewRepresentation & Roland Barthes’ Semiotics Structuralism (3) Outline 1. Representation

“Myth”: distortion, naturalizing The form(on the secondary level) does not

suppress the original meaning, it only impoverishes it, it puts it at a distance... myth hides nothing: its function is to distort, not

to make disappear Target: Myth has an imperative, buttonholing

character: ...it is I whom it has come to seek. ... For this interpellant speech is at the same time

a frozen speech: at the moment of reaching me, it suspends itself, turns away and assumes the look of a generality; it stiffens, it makes itself looks natural and innocent