semantics

53
SEMANTICS Making Meanings with Words

Upload: willow-pangket

Post on 09-May-2015

1.460 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Semantics

SEMANTICS

Making Meanings with Words

Page 2: Semantics

Words have arbitrary meanings that we can express in terms of semantic features.

Word meanings are constructed through a variety of relationship, which we refer as the nyms

Words have many nonliteral, or figurative, meanings, which are complex and abstract.

Page 3: Semantics

SEMANTICS

A branch of linguistics concerned with the nature, structure, and the development and changes of the meanings of speech forms, or with contextual meaning.

A study of how we construct and understand the meaning of words and groups of words.

Page 4: Semantics

Even sentences made up of nonsense words have some kind of meaning

Consider this sentence:

She yarped that canzos spleeked the batoids.

Page 5: Semantics

Semantic Deviance

Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.

A sentence like this is anomalous, which means they deviate from expected meanings.

Page 6: Semantics

Poetry is often based on deviations from expected meanings as well, as this poem by Shel Silverstein (1981) shows:

What Did?What did the carrot say to the wheat?“’Lettuce’ rest, I’m feeling ‘beet.’”What did the paper say to the pen?“I feel quite all ‘write,’ my friend.”What did the teapot say to the chalk?Nothing, you silly . . . Teapots can’t talk!

(Light in the Attic, p. 16)

Page 7: Semantics

Is language Natural or conventional?• In Plato’s Cratylus, Socrates,

Cratylus, and Hermogenes argue at length over whether names of things are chosen by individuals, communities, or some higher reality outside human control.

Lexical SemanticsFormal study

of the conventions

of word meaning.

Page 8: Semantics

Lexical SemanticsThe connection between a word and its meaning is arbitrary.

Onomatopeic words (onomatopoeia is Greek for name making) which are words that sound like their meanings. Also called echoic words.

The pronunciation of onomatopeic words can provide clues to their meanings.

Clues to the meaning of the word can also be derived from the morphology of a word and also form it syntactic position.

Page 9: Semantics

Etymological clues to unlock meanings.• We draw on our knowledge of the

origins of words of cognates: words that have common ancestors such as Hund in German and Hound in English.

Context: drawn from our experience. • ‘About to be caught in the act, the

burglars defenestrated the jewelry.’

Lexical Semantics

Page 10: Semantics

Some aspects of meaning can be

represented in terms of opposition expressed by binary features.

Semantic features: (+/- human) (+/- animate) (+/- young) (+/- married)

Meaning Classifications:

Semantic Features

Page 11: Semantics

The bachelor is married.

The baby drove to town in a Ford pickup.

The rock comb its hair.

Meaning Classifications:

Semantic Features

Page 12: Semantics

Nyms – meaning relationships among words – antonyms, synonyms, homonyms, etc. Opposite meanings: Antonymy Similar meanings: Synonymy Meaning categories: Hyponymy Related meanings: Polysemy Different meanings: Homonymy

Meaning Relationships: The

Nyms

Page 13: Semantics

Opposite meanings: Antonymy

• Gradable: antonyms are two ends on a scale, and there can be various gradations of each term.

Word that we think of as opposites, though oppositions may be relational, complementary, or gradable.

• Cleave can mean either to adhere closely or to divide.

Some words can have two diametrically opposed meanings:

Page 14: Semantics

Antonym typesGradable Relational Complementary

Smart/ stupid Teacher/ student Dead/ alive

Often/ rarely Friend/ enemy Before/ after

Fat/ thin Question/ answer Permit/ prohibit

Most/ least Doctor/ patient Precede/ follow

Up/ down Mother/ father Send/ receive

Tall/ short Parent/ child Beginning/end

Rich/ poor Lawyer/ client Day/ night

Opposite meanings: Antonymy

Page 15: Semantics

Words that are different in form but similar in meaning.

• Synonyms are derived form a variety of sources, and we make choices among synonyms for a variety of reasons

Synonymy allows for a variety of ways to express ideas, it can be a source of euphemisms.• Euphemisms are used to avoid offending

words or to deliberately obscure actual meanings.

Similar meanings: Synonymy

Page 16: Semantics

Euphemism

Physical persuasion - torture

Wet work - assassination

Urinate – got to the bathroom

Page 17: Semantics

Synonyms of Anglo-Saxon and Latin/ Greek Origin

LandTryHardTalk (about)CrazyGhostCleanDirtGoSeeHolySpaceheavenly

AlightAttemptDifficultDiscussInsaneSpiritSanitarySoilAdvanceVisualizeSacredCosmosCelestial

Anglo-Saxon origin Latin/ Greek Origin

Page 18: Semantics

Meaning Categories: hyponymy

Hyponym A word whose meaning is included, or entailed, in the meaning of a more general word.

Example: Thoroughbred – horseHouse - building

Page 19: Semantics

A hyponym can itself have hyponyms as shown in the diagram

bovine

Cow elk antelope deer

Guernsey Holstein Hereford

Page 20: Semantics

We use hyponymy in language to make general statements more specific:

What are you doing?

A book/ a Russian novel/ War and Peace

Page 21: Semantics

Related Meanings: Polysemy

Words that are polysemous have two or more related meanings (Greek poly “many’, semy ‘meanings’)

lip = of a cliff or part of the moutheye = the eye of the stormfoot = -of the mountain, -of the

stairsarm = arm of a chair

Page 22: Semantics

A retronym is a new word,

compound word, r phrase created to distinguish an original word from a more recent meaning of a word.

acoustic guitar/ electric guitarfilm camera/ digital camera

Retronym: another meaning relationship (type of polysemy)

Page 23: Semantics

Semantic shifts – how word

meanings changeover time. Semantics shifts happen in a variety of ways.

Meaning Change: Semantic Shift

Hund (O.E)

Hound (M.E)

dog

Particular type of dog

Shifts in connotations – changes in general meanings associated with a

word.

This process is called narrowing

Page 24: Semantics

Narrowing – change in words’ meanings over time to more specific meanings.

Broadening – change in words’ meanings over time to more general or inclusive Dogge (O.E) – referred to a

particular breed of dog and today refers to domestic canines in general Decimate (Romans) – used to mean ‘twig, tendril, or branch’, but now it means the action of twisting something’, and anything that has been twisted.

Page 25: Semantics

Amelioration – a shift to a more positive connotation.

Croon (E) – ‘to sing softly’, Kronen (Dutch) – ‘to groan or lament’. Pejoration – shifting to a more

negative connotation

Churl (present-day English – ‘a rude or ill-bred person’, (M.E – degenerated in meaning, ceorl (O.E) – ‘peasant, freeman, layman)

Page 26: Semantics

Homonyms – words that sound the

same but have different meanings (Greek Homeos ‘same’, onoma

‘name’)Verb bear - ‘to have children’ or ‘to tolerate’ Homophones - words with the same

sounds, but not necessarily share the same spelling

sole/soul, gorilla/guerilla, to/too/two

Homographs – have different meanings, the same spelling, but different pronunciations

(the bow of a ship versus a bow and arrow)

Different Meanings: Homonymy

Page 27: Semantics

Shifts in denotation – complete change in word’s meanings overtime

Blush – used to mean ‘look’ or ‘gaze’, in early (Mod.E – ‘to redden in the face from shame or modesty)

Page 28: Semantics

Making New Meanings: Figurative

LanguageFigurative language provides a tool to express a vast range of meaning beyond the primary meanings of words. Metaphor

Metaphero (Gk) – ‘to carry over’ or ‘transfer’

Metaphorical meanings reflect our conceptual structures, how we view the world.

Page 29: Semantics

Types of MetaphorsDead metaphors – those that are conventionalized in everyday speech that we don’t even realize they are metaphors.

I see your point. I’ll take a look at your paper for you. He is blind to new ideas.

Mixed metaphor – those in which parts of different metaphors are telescoped into one utterance.

- comprises parts of different metaphors

“Hit the nail on the jackpot” – “hit the nail on the head” and “hit the jackpot”

‘to achieve a goal of some kind’

Page 30: Semantics

Personification – gives human attributes to something that is not human o The gates opened their arms.

o The projects ate up all my time.o The cold knocked me out.o The idea died a natural death.

Synesthesia – a metaphorical language which one kind sensation is described in terms of another.

Color is attributed to sounds, odor to color, sound to odor, etc(sweet smell, loud colors,

Page 31: Semantics

Metonymy – refers to something by describing it in terms of something with which it is closely associated.

The pen is mightier than the sword.

Synecdoche – it uses a part of something to refer to the whole thing

Car – as wheels or a rideMore abstractGive me a hand = helpLend me an ear = your attentionTwo head are better than one = cooperation

Page 32: Semantics

Comparing meanings: Simile

Simile – differs from metaphor. A comparison of two unlike things and usually involve words like or as

She’s big as a house.We’re happy as clams.My brain is like a sieve.

Page 33: Semantics

Idioms – they are collocations of language of words or phrases with nonliteral meaning.

Kick the bucket – die

Page 34: Semantics

Semantics and Pragmatics:Making Meaning with Sentences

Sentences have meaning, derived both from their structure and from the context in which they are uttered.

Sentence meaningThe meaning of a sentence on its own regardless of its context.The literal meaning of a sentence, regardless of context.

Have you quit smoking?

Page 35: Semantics

Utterance Meaning

The unspoken or indirect meaning of sentences.The meaning of a sentence in context.

How are you doing? (when you meet someone on the street)

Are you asking information about someone’s well-being?

Are you simply saying hello in a nonliteral way?

Page 36: Semantics

Pragmatics

The study of meaning of language in context (utterance meaning).

Pragmatics overlaps semantics to provide us with a bigger picture of how we construct a meaning out of language.

Page 37: Semantics

Pragmatics: How Contexts Shapes Meaning

The meaning of utterance is bound up with the context in which you hear it.

First scenario: You hear an urgent, adult voice utter “A train is coming!” while you were standing on a railroad track not paying much attention to proximity of trains, you would, under typical circumstances, quickly move of the track safety.

Page 38: Semantics

Second scenario: A child comes up with her mother and, laughing, says, “ A train is coming!”

The social context within which a sentence is uttered can affect its meaning.

Page 39: Semantics

Speech Acts: Saying what you mean and meaning what you say

Kinds of Syntactic Structures called sentence types:

Interrogatives (questions)Imperatives (commands)Declaratives (statements)

Is it raining?Get out!I’d like a sandwich.

Page 40: Semantics

Each utterance we make carries a communicative force and can be thought of as performing a particular speech act.

Direct speech act – when sentence type corresponds to our intention.

- utterance whose meaning is the sum of its parts, the literal meaning

Is it raining?

Page 41: Semantics

Indirect speech act –Its meaning depends on context rather than on sentence type.

Have you cleaned your room?

This is a simple illustration of the complexity of speech acts and of how sentence type does not always correspond to speaker’s intention.

Page 42: Semantics

Speech act theory tries to explain more precisely how meaning and action are related to language.

- (introduced by John Austin 1962) is concerned with communicative intentions of speakers and how they achieve their communicative goals.

- communication is a series of communicative acts that are used systematically to accomplish particular purposes and having a specific force assigned to them.

Page 43: Semantics

Austin offers three basic kinds of acts that are simultaneously performed by an utterance.

Locutionary act: An utterance with particular sense and reference (the sum of its part)

Illocutionary act: The act (defined by social convention) that is performed by making the utterance: a statement, offer, promise, bet, ect.

Page 44: Semantics

Perlocutionary act: The (not necessarily intentional) effects on the audience, whether intended or unintended, brought about by the utterance

“Jo, would you like to read your poem first?”

Page 45: Semantics

Conversational Rules

Conversational rules for how to communicate spoken and unspoken messages.

Paul Grice (1975, 1989) proposed the following maxims of conversation, which continue to be an accurate description of the shared rules that speakers use in interactions.

Page 46: Semantics

Grice’s Maxim of Conversation

Maxim of QuantityMake your contribution to the

conversation as informative as necessary.

Do not make your contribution to the conversation more informative than necessary.

Maxim of QualityDo not say what you believe to be

false.Do not say that for which you lack

adequate evidence.

Page 47: Semantics

Maxim of RelevanceSay only things that are relevant.

Maxim of MannerAvoid obscurity of expression.Avoid ambiguity.Be brief (avoid unnecessary wordiness).Be orderly.

Page 48: Semantics

Grice’s Cooperative Principle

An assumption that in conversation speakers will make a sincere effort to collaboratively exchange information

Speaker meaning – meaning beyond the words alone, which the speaker assumes the hearer can interpret based on communicative context

Page 49: Semantics

Manipulating Maxim – speakers can violate maxims because of maxim clash, wherein if one maxim is to be maintained, another must be violated.

Utterances in which maxims are followed, violated, and then flouted:

1. Speaker A: Have you been to a baseball game lately? Speaker B: No, but I’m going to go to a game this weekend. (Maxims are followed)

Page 50: Semantics

2. Speaker A: When is your next class? Speaker B: Sometime this afternoon.

(maxim clash: quality, quantity)

3. Speaker A: So, do you think Maria will make it to the wedding? Speaker B: Well, she told me she was taking off work that day. (cooperative principle)

Page 51: Semantics

4. Speaker A: So, do you think Maria is having a baby? Speaker B: I have a train to catch. [flouting several maxims: (maxim of relevance, quantity, quality)]*cooperative principle – there are other interpretation on Speaker B’s statement

Page 52: Semantics

Understanding and using a language involves a complex interplay of social and linguistic factors, including our cultural expectations, attitudes about power and solidarity, social conventions, and much more.

Learning to use language may be as complex a process as acquiring the language itself, and both are essential components of our linguistic knowledge.

Page 53: Semantics

Grice’s Maxim of ConversationA. Make up a (plausible) conversational exchange in which Grice’s maxims are followed. Explain briefly how each maxim is satisfied.B. Come up with a (plausible) conversation in which at least one of Grice’s maxim is violated. Explain why the violation might take place and what influences the speakers and hearers could use to make sense of the utterances. (Remember that a violation doesn’t necessarily mean that the conversation breaks down; it is often the result of maxim clash, wherein a maxim is violated but the cooperative principle maintained.C. Now, come up with an example of a conversational exchange in which at least one of Grice’s maxims is flouted. Does the conversation break down or not? Explain briefly.