self-excited vibration ii

Upload: kush-dewangan

Post on 03-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    1/13

    II. Self-excited vibration in machining operations

    Sources of vibration in machining operations:

    Forced vibration caused by rotating unbalances in machinery Self-excited vibration caused by positive feedback mechanism leading

    to dynamic instability of cutting process

    Consequences: Poor surface finish, reduction of tool lifetime, damage toworkpiece, tool or machinery

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    2/13

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    3/13

    Negative velocity dependence of cutting force due to thermal feedback:

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    4/13

    0 1 2 3 4

    8

    F0

    F

    C u t

    t i n g

    f o r c e

    Cutting speed v / v1

    Example: Exponential velocity dependence of cutting force

    ]exp[)()( 10 vvF F F vF +=

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    5/13

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    6/13

    II.1 Regenerative vibration in high-speed machining

    Observation:

    Surface oscillationfrequency at a givencutting speedapproximately matchesnatural frequency offree tool oscillations inperpendicular direction

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    7/13

    Feedback due to dependence of cutting force oncutting depth when cutting into previously machinedsurface

    Increased surfaceundulation

    Increasing oscillationin cutting force magnitude

    Increasing oscillation ofcutting tool

    cutting width

    Phase lag betweencutting force andtool oscillation

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    8/13

    Mechanical model of regenerative tool vibration:

    dh

    dF F

    t xT t xhF hF kx xc xm

    x=

    +==++

    '

    )]()(['' 0&&&

    is proportional to cutting width w

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    9/13

    k F

    t xT t x x x x

    '

    )]()([2 20200

    =

    =++

    &&&

    After shifting coordinates to eliminate constant force F h0 and transformationto canonical form

    Crucial argument: Boundary of stability separates a regime of exponentiallydamped oscillations from a regime of exponentially growing oscillations

    At boundary of stability: Oscillations are neither growing nor damped

    Consequence: We can assume solution in the form )exp()( t i X t x =

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    10/13

    [ ]

    ( )[ ] ( )( )[ ]20

    20

    2220

    020

    2

    12

    41

    1)exp(21

    +=

    =

    +

    M

    T ii

    Minimal critical value of the feedback parameter: At

    Below this parameter, no instability can occur at any frequency. In physicalterms, this means that there is a minimal chip width below which cutting isabsolutely stable irrespective of spindle speed.

    ( ) 2120 +=

    )1(2min +=

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    11/13

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    12/13

    Diagram has the shape of a sequence of lobes. Interpretation of the lobediagram:

    Instability occurs first where the spindle speed (revolutions per second)times the number of oscillations on the workpiece surface (the lobenumber)matches the natural frequency of the tool oscillation (in Hertz)

    At higher cutting parameters the instability boundaries expand andultimately merge.

    For each cutting parameter there is a highest spindle speed wherethe cutting operation becomes absolutely stable.

  • 7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II

    13/13

    Summary: Sources of vibration in machining operations

    Forced vibration due to rotating unbalances in machinery -> vibrationamplitude varies weakly with machine speed, vibration amplitude isindependent of cutting parameters, vibration frequency = rotation speed

    of machine Self-excited vibration -> vibration amplitude varies strongly with spindlespeed and chip width (vibrations emerge suddenly upon a smallchange of parameters), vibration frequency = natural frequency of tooloscillations

    Consequences: Poor surface finish, reduction of tool lifetime, damage toworkpiece and machinery.

    Diagnostics: Measure frequency and amplitude of vibration while varying

    spindle speed and chip width.

    Mitigation: If forced vibration: move rotation speed out of resonance.If self-excited: fine tune rotation speed, reduce chip width.