self-excited vibration ii
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
1/13
II. Self-excited vibration in machining operations
Sources of vibration in machining operations:
Forced vibration caused by rotating unbalances in machinery Self-excited vibration caused by positive feedback mechanism leading
to dynamic instability of cutting process
Consequences: Poor surface finish, reduction of tool lifetime, damage toworkpiece, tool or machinery
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
2/13
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
3/13
Negative velocity dependence of cutting force due to thermal feedback:
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
4/13
0 1 2 3 4
8
F0
F
C u t
t i n g
f o r c e
Cutting speed v / v1
Example: Exponential velocity dependence of cutting force
]exp[)()( 10 vvF F F vF +=
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
5/13
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
6/13
II.1 Regenerative vibration in high-speed machining
Observation:
Surface oscillationfrequency at a givencutting speedapproximately matchesnatural frequency offree tool oscillations inperpendicular direction
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
7/13
Feedback due to dependence of cutting force oncutting depth when cutting into previously machinedsurface
Increased surfaceundulation
Increasing oscillationin cutting force magnitude
Increasing oscillation ofcutting tool
cutting width
Phase lag betweencutting force andtool oscillation
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
8/13
Mechanical model of regenerative tool vibration:
dh
dF F
t xT t xhF hF kx xc xm
x=
+==++
'
)]()(['' 0&&&
is proportional to cutting width w
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
9/13
k F
t xT t x x x x
'
)]()([2 20200
=
=++
&&&
After shifting coordinates to eliminate constant force F h0 and transformationto canonical form
Crucial argument: Boundary of stability separates a regime of exponentiallydamped oscillations from a regime of exponentially growing oscillations
At boundary of stability: Oscillations are neither growing nor damped
Consequence: We can assume solution in the form )exp()( t i X t x =
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
10/13
[ ]
( )[ ] ( )( )[ ]20
20
2220
020
2
12
41
1)exp(21
+=
=
+
M
T ii
Minimal critical value of the feedback parameter: At
Below this parameter, no instability can occur at any frequency. In physicalterms, this means that there is a minimal chip width below which cutting isabsolutely stable irrespective of spindle speed.
( ) 2120 +=
)1(2min +=
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
11/13
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
12/13
Diagram has the shape of a sequence of lobes. Interpretation of the lobediagram:
Instability occurs first where the spindle speed (revolutions per second)times the number of oscillations on the workpiece surface (the lobenumber)matches the natural frequency of the tool oscillation (in Hertz)
At higher cutting parameters the instability boundaries expand andultimately merge.
For each cutting parameter there is a highest spindle speed wherethe cutting operation becomes absolutely stable.
-
7/28/2019 Self-Excited Vibration II
13/13
Summary: Sources of vibration in machining operations
Forced vibration due to rotating unbalances in machinery -> vibrationamplitude varies weakly with machine speed, vibration amplitude isindependent of cutting parameters, vibration frequency = rotation speed
of machine Self-excited vibration -> vibration amplitude varies strongly with spindlespeed and chip width (vibrations emerge suddenly upon a smallchange of parameters), vibration frequency = natural frequency of tooloscillations
Consequences: Poor surface finish, reduction of tool lifetime, damage toworkpiece and machinery.
Diagnostics: Measure frequency and amplitude of vibration while varying
spindle speed and chip width.
Mitigation: If forced vibration: move rotation speed out of resonance.If self-excited: fine tune rotation speed, reduce chip width.