1/22/2015

1

INTER-MUNICIPAL COOPERATION FOR BETTER

URBAN SERVICES

Experience Of Joint Secretariat KARTAMANTUL

City of YogyaKARTA

Regency of SleMAN

Regency of BanTUL

KARTAMANTUL

The innovation for integrating urban

infrastructure management

The Basic Argument

Phase 1 Phase 2

Phase 3

Improving Yogyakarta Urban Agglomerations

1/22/2015

2

Area of Sleman Regency

Area of Bantul Regency

Area of Yogyakarta City

Yogyakarta Urban

Agglomeration Area

BORDER- CROSSING URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

POTENTIAL PROBLEM IN URBAN INSFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT

Before No serious problem, Everything can be managed by strong central and provincial government, and weak

local government

After (during decentralization era) The bordering local government are: Inward looking,

Over protective, Euphoria of autonomy

Main Problem: final disposal, sewer treatment plant, sewage/sewerage network, road and transportation, integrated drainage,

water resource and distribution, etc

The situation requires a

body to integrate

urban infrastructure management,

among the adjacent area

The Alternative to Solve the Problem

Joint Secretariat

KARTAMANTUL As a method for

integrating Urban

Infrastructures Management

The Vision:

Take responsibility as a bridge for the realization of an equal, fair, participative, transparent, and democratic cooperation, in order to develop the comfort, beautiful, & healthy urban agglomeration area with

the support of adequate infrastructure and a highly community participation.

1/22/2015

3

The Mission:

1.Negotiation for fair results 2.Mediate to solve problem 3.Coordination of management and

implementation process 4.Facilitation of decision making process 5.Build strong Networking 6.Initiation of change process 7.Provision of policy recommendation

6 SECTORS COOPERATION COVERAGE OF JOINT SECRETARIAT

The Think Tank:

Top Management :

Bupati / Mayor

Midle Management :

Sekda’s, Head of Planning Dept

(Steering Team)

Lower Management :

Technical Staff

(Technical Team)

The Decision Making Process: 3 Local Goverment

GOVERNING BOARD General Policy, Final Approval

3 Local Government STEERING TEAM

Direction, Instruction

HEAD/SECRETARY Management

PROVINCE STAKEHOLDER

Request

SEKBER

Operation Team

External Advisory

TECHNICAL TEAM

Preparation & Implementation

DPRD

Planning board Public Works Dept Legal Division Environmental Dept

Implementation section of local governments

1/22/2015

4

SUPPORT FOR JOINT SECRETARIAT

SEKBER KARTAMANTUL

Step 1. 2003-2004 by GTZ Strengthen its function & tasks Focus on implementation of cooperation

Support the process of effective cooperation Facilitate study on legal status and

organization form Assist to enhance decision making process Assist in stakeholder involvement

Improve communication strategy

Step 2: 2005 - 2006 by GTZ Continue to strengthen the

organization: format, function, SOP Support initiative for cooperation on

spatial planning and control Support the improvement of the

shared facility management Continue to improve communication

strategy Linking and dissemination to national

network

SUPPORT FOR JOINT SECRETARIAT

SEKBER KARTAMANTUL

Output:

Technical and organizational

advise on process oriented

institution building for inter-

municipal cooperation

Use of output:

SekBer and 3 Local Gov’s

enable to improve or change

process, procedures, or

structures (e.g. Perda, etc)

and to implement the

agreements of cooperation

Benefit:

Residents get better access

to basic infrastructure

service and to decision

making process of SekBer,

take care and share cost of

public service

Indirect impact:

Local Governments increase

accountability. Quality of

public goods and services is

increasing

Chain of result

Economic and urban

Development, Quality of life

LESSON LEARNED Cooperation of local governments is horizontal decision-

making

Benefits competitively and quality of public service

Is cost efficient, more when it is preventive

Focus on practical and feasible examples improves organizational structure and motivates cooperation

Involvement of stakeholder focus priorities

"Local governments challenge of urban growth cannot successfully confronted individually“

Needs: precise task and function of planning and service authorities of provincial, district, city government

For local governments : instruments for financing of public infrastructure and for land use regulation

1/22/2015

5

KEY SUCCES FACTOR

Motivation, common needs, strengthen cooperation commitment

Local Culture: tolerance, deliberation, equality and togetherness

Geographical characteristic

Existence of provincial governments support

Existence of external support (Donors, University)

Existence of real object of cooperation

Leadership

Supportive regulations in line with public needs

Organized administrative procedures of the Joint Secretariat

Stakeholder Involvement

Joint Secretariat Kartamantul as a

BEST PRACTICE of Municipal Cooperation

in Indonesia

Thank ’s