seizing the agenda - raising the ceiling | moving teaching from good to great | prof. toby greany
TRANSCRIPT
From Raising the Floor to Raising the Ceiling
Whole Education 6th Annual Conference
Twitter | @WholeEducation#Seizingtheagenda
Establishing a shared vision for school improvement
Seizing the Agenda
Seizing the agenda: moving teaching from good to great
Whole Education workshop
Professor Toby Greany
November 2015
“There is nothing a politician likes so little as to be well-informed.
It makes decision making so complex and difficult.”
(John Maynard Keynes)
“For me, politics shouldn’t be some mind-bending exercise. It’s about what you feel in your gut”
(David Cameron, April 2011)
4
Dr Ben Goldacre report for DfE(2013)
Education should be more like medicine in the way it designs and uses research
We need an ‘information architecture’ and more Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs)
Evidence-based (or informed) teaching is high on the agenda
Schools in the driving seat:
• Quangos closed / stripped back
• Local Authorities – minimal resources and capacity
• Academies – autonomous and accountable
• Schools driving Initial Teacher Education through School Direct
• Teaching Schools define and disseminate effective practice through R&D and CPD roles
The onus is on schools to develop evidence-informed practice
Exce
pti
on
al C
PD
in a
pro
f’n
alle
arn
ing
com
mu
nit
y
Effe
ctiv
e le
ader
ship
Shar
ed v
isio
n, v
alu
es, a
nd
cu
ltu
re
Stim
ula
tin
g an
d in
clu
sive
en
viro
nm
ent
Bro
ad a
nd
bal
ance
d c
urr
icu
lum
Hig
h q
ual
ity
par
tner
ship
s
Rig
oro
us
self
eva
luat
ion
an
d
revi
ew
“Eight pillars - and one foundation - of greatness”
Wo
rld
cla
ss t
each
ing
and
lear
nin
g
Good to Great - adapted
Reflective Practice - Evidence informed practice - What works
In threes:
1) share an aspect of your own practice that ‘works’?
2) what's the absolute best practice in your school?
How do you know – what’s your evidence for your claims?
Research evidence
Professional expertise
and judgement
Classroom context
and learner needs
Management and pupil
data
EIP
Durbin, B. and Nelson, J. (2014). Why Effective use of Evidence in the Classroom Needs System-wide Change , NFER
Evidence-informed practice aligns internal & external knowledge
• Use praise lavishly
• Allow learners to discover key ideas for themselves
• Group learners by ability
• Encourage re-reading and highlighting to memorise key
ideas
• Address issues of confidence and low aspirations before you
try to teach content
• Present information in learners’ preferred learning style
• Ensure learners are always active, rather than listening
passively, if you want them to remember
Examples of ineffective practices …
What makes great teaching?, Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins S., & Elliot Major L., 2014
The kind of teaching needed today requires teachers to be high-level knowledge workers who constantly advance their own professional knowledge as well as that of their profession… (But) knowledge workers are not attracted by schools organized like an assembly line... To attract and develop knowledge workers… (schools must offer) the status, pay, professional autonomy, and the high quality education that go with professional work, with effective systems of teacher evaluation, with differentiated career paths and career diversity for teachers.
Schleicher, A (2011) Building a High-Quality Teaching Profession: Lessons from around the world
Teachers as knowledge workers
Knowledge of what is to be taught and of the craft of teaching
An aptitude for connecting with young people and supporting them
Able quickly to figure out when students are not learning, what they need to learn next, and to draw on a wide range of knowledge and skills
to find the right solution or combination of solutions.
Teaching: The ability to give meaning to new experiences.
Concept/skill builder: Combines pedagogical knowledge, knowledge of
the learner, knowledge of educational ends, and knowledge of the subject.
Task manager Crude knowledge of educational context and purposes. Classrooms should look busy and orderly, pupils should complete assigned tasks, the teacher should be in control.
Curriculum delivererStrong curriculum knowledge, knowledge of educational context and purposes. Learning is prescribed; the curriculum itself provides the reason why learning is important.
Source: Twistleton, 2012
“Teachers are more likely to be a task manager or a curriculum deliverer if they sustain very busy environments with no built-in developmental programme, and if they are part of an unreflective culture, with an unarticulated pedagogy…. On the other hand, the teacher is more likely to be a concept/skill builder if teaching contexts are conducive to articulation and debate about knowledge, beliefs and values; if they are able to compare/contrast/critique different approaches; and if they are helped to get on the inside of teachable moments in a way that is developmental and scaffolded”.
Prof Sam Twistleton, UCET Annual Conference Report, 2012
Developing concept/skill builders
Imagine a school in which you taught better simply by virtue of teaching in
that school. What would such a school be like?
Judith Warren Little
Developing great teachers: the school as a learning environment
“The conclusions from.. research, in both
education and nursing, confirm that the main barriers to knowledge
use… are not at the level of individual resistance but
originate in an institutional culture that does not foster learning.”
Hemsley-Brown, 2004
By design?
Through a planned sequence?
How can schools enable teachers to question, understand and enrich their practice?
Organisational structures can get in the way
By chance? By design?
Through structures?
Culture
Talking about your knowledge on a given issue
Looking at research on a given issue
and then how this can be used to
produce approaches to teaching and
learning
Trialling and embedding
these within your school
Making them a way of life
R&D – a collaborative professional learning process
There was an agenda but not outcome defined, so that I felt like I was really involved… It did feel like a kind of negotiating, a chipping away, a kind of sculpting it from what everyone’s experiences were. (Teacher participant)
(R&D is) absolutely fundamental to school improvement for us – the most important thing probably. (Senior Leader)
Maxwell and Greany, NCTL, 2015
Structured R&D can impact on individuals and schools
That’s the real challenge. The people who are involved and committed are hooked in through the research and development bit. Then, when it spreads out, if they have not been involved in that first wave, they haven’t therefore (shared) in the action learning. They hear it and say that’s a good idea but they don’t do it in the same way that embeds it as deeply in their psyche or in their pedagogy really. (Alliance R&D lead)
Maxwell and Greany, NCTL, 2015
But mobilising knowledge and evidence remains a challenge
Teacher
CPD facilitator
School leaders
Peers
Pupils
Carefully designed/aligned
teacher CPDL with a strong focus on pupil
outcomes has a significant impact on student achievement
Consistent finding across all reviews
Mobilising evidence depends on effective CPD
1. Substantive development has to be sustained over
time - 2 terms plus (but one-offs can work for very
specific practices)
2. Multiple, iterative activities and opportunities
following initial instruction to refine/adapt
practice in multiple contexts in light of pupils’
responses
3. Time alone isn’t enough - Banarama principle!
Time
Cordingley, Higgins, Greany et al, Teacher Development Trust, 2015
4 Need:
• individual starting points to be recognised and develop a collective sense of purpose
• to focus on aspirations for pupils and how they learn/ progress in response to teachers’ learning
• to explore existing theories, beliefs and practices, but often challenge these
5 Relevance matters - but that and volunteers vs conscripts matter less than environment / time /peer learning/ focus on pupils
Cordingley, Higgins, Greany et al, Teacher Development Trust, 2015
Participants
6 Formative assessment is key – for modelling approaches, refining support, contextualising for subjects/ pupil groups and evaluating impact
7 Need for external input, to challenge orthodoxies supportively - sometimes complemented by internal specialists.
8 Facilitators as subject, evaluation and process experts
9 Peer support - learning together with peers; reciprocal vulnerability speeds up risk taking
Approaches
Cordingley, Higgins, Greany et al, Teacher Development Trust, 2015
10. Setting out deliberately to develop meta-cognitive control eg by:
– Analysing and evaluating CPD content and evidence re pupils’ responses and interpreting them; and
– Iterative opportunities to encounter, understand, respond to and reflect on new approaches as part of the day job
11. School leaders must create the conditions for this -resources, modelling and challenge
12 No single element or process works – crucial to combine them, align them with goals – effectively!
Approaches
Cordingley, Higgins, Greany et al, Teacher Development Trust, 2015
• Generic pedagogic CPD – contextualisation for subjects and pupils is crucial
• Telling teachers what to do or providing materials without chance to develop skills and explore impacts
• Failing to provide a strong focus on aspirations for pupils or assessing links between teacher and pupil learning
• Providing time and or frequent support without structured opportunities to engage with, understand and reflect on the implications of new approaches/ practices
What doesn’t work?
Cordingley, Higgins, Greany et al, Teacher Development Trust, 2015
Individual
evidence
champions
within
teams
Systems &
processes that
make research,
data and evidence
available and
encourage use
Partnerships with
HEIs and
external experts
School leaders
understand and
promote
evidence-
informed practice,
via R&D and
CPDLSchool or partnership
Culture that
expects continual
and rigorous
evaluation and
review
Putting it all together
In threes:
• Who are the ‘evidence champions’ in your school?
• Draw a diagram of how knowledge and evidence of effective practice moves around your school? Does it reach everyone? Does it change practice and, if so, how?
• How robust is your CPD provision when compared to the evidence?
• What more could you do to build an evidence-informed culture?