seismic risk assessment in urban areas - …ares.tu.chiba-u.jp/workshop/peru2005/07 olarte...
TRANSCRIPT
SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN URBAN AREASSEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN URBAN AREAS
Dr. Ing. Jorge Olarte NDr. Ing. Jorge Olarte NavarroavarroDirector Director -- CISMIDCISMID
UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE INGENIERIA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE INGENIERIA Facultad de Ingeniería CivilFacultad de Ingeniería Civil
CENTRO PERUANO JAPONES DE INVESTIGACIONESCENTRO PERUANO JAPONES DE INVESTIGACIONESSISMICAS Y MITIGACION DE DESASTRES SISMICAS Y MITIGACION DE DESASTRES -- CISMIDCISMID
JapanJapan--PeruPeru WorkshopWorkshop onon EarthquakeEarthquake DisasterDisaster MitigationMitigation, Lima 2005, Lima 2005
1. Methodology to Vulnerability and Seismic Risk Assessment
2. Studies on Vulnerability and Seismic Risk in Marginal-UrbanAreas, Essential Buildings, Historical Building and InsuranceIndustry
PRESENTATION OUTLINEPRESENTATION OUTLINE
MethodologyMethodology toto VulnerabilityVulnerability andand SeismicSeismic RiskRisk AssessmentAssessment
)(4
)(2
24321 TSNh
Nai π
ηββββγρ
=
E γ( ) 1 eln 0.5( )
γ
γo
ε
⋅
−:= γo
BSH Log Pr 60%≥( )−
Ie= Eo.G.Sd.T
Ιv=ΣΚj Wj (Benedetti y Petrini)
(Hirosawa)
(ATC-FEMA)
(Miranda y Ordaz)
ComputationalComputational ModelModel DiagramDiagram
MethodologyMethodology toto VulnerabilityVulnerability andand SeismicSeismic RiskRiskAssessmentAssessment
2. Studies on Vulnerability and Seismic Riskin Marginal-Urban Areas, EssentialBuildings, Historical Buildings andInsurance Industry
StudyStudy onon SeismicSeismic VulnerabilityVulnerability ofof thetheLima Marginal Lima Marginal AreaArea ““El AltilloEl Altillo--RimacRimac””
StudyStudy onon SeismicSeismic VulnerabilityVulnerability ofof thethe Lima Lima Marginal Marginal AreaArea “El Altillo“El Altillo--Rimac”Rimac”
PLANO DE UBICACION
SeismicSeismic VulnerabilityVulnerability ofof El AltilloEl Altillo--RimacRimac
Vulnerability Index (Benedetti y Petrini) Degree of Damage caused by a strongearthquake intensity (350 gals)
SeismicSeismic VulnerabilityVulnerability ininLima Lima CenterCenter (Mesa Redonda)(Mesa Redonda)
FEMAFEMA--ATCATC
Photo
Croquis
Modifiers
Final Score Evaluation required ?
Occupants
Personal background
Generalfeatures
of theBuilding
EvaluationFormat
FEMA-ATC
Type
Obtained Damage Factors (ATC-21)
BSHAdobe
BSH; 2.00
BSH; 1.50
BSH; 0.50
BSH; 0.000.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
VI VII VIII IX
Tesis Vulnerabilidad Sismica en Mesa RedondaBach. Roberto Rojas Castro (2003)
BSH
Exponencial (BSH)
BSHAdobe
BSH; 2.00
BSH; 1.50
BSH; 0.50
BSH; 0.000.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
VI VII VIII IX
Tesis Vulnerabilidad Sismica en Mesa RedondaBach. Roberto Rojas Castro (2003)
BSH
Exponencial (BSH)
BSHAlbañileria
BSH; 4.00
BSH; 2.50
BSH; 1.00
BSH; 0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
VI VII VIII IX
Tesis Vulnerabilidad Sismica en Mesa RedondaBach. Roberto Rojas Castro (2003)
BSH
Exponencial (BSH)
BSHAlbañileria
BSH; 4.00
BSH; 2.50
BSH; 1.00
BSH; 0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
VI VII VIII IX
Tesis Vulnerabilidad Sismica en Mesa RedondaBach. Roberto Rojas Castro (2003)
BSH
Exponencial (BSH)
BSHPorticos de Concreto
BSH; 4.00
BSH; 1.50
BSH; 1.00
BSH; 6.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
VI VII VIII IX
Tesis Vulnerabilidad Sismica en Mesa RedondaBach. Roberto Rojas Castro (2003)
BSH
Exponencial (BSH)
BSHPorticos de Concreto
BSH; 4.00
BSH; 1.50
BSH; 1.00
BSH; 6.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
VI VII VIII IX
Tesis Vulnerabilidad Sismica en Mesa RedondaBach. Roberto Rojas Castro (2003)
BSH
Exponencial (BSH)
BSHAlbañileria No Confinada
BSH; 2.00
BSH; 0.50
BSH; 0.00
BSH; 3.00
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
VI VII VIII IX
Tesis Vulnerabilidad Sismica en Mesa RedondaBach. Roberto Rojas Castro (2003)
BSH
Exponencial (BSH)
BSHAlbañileria No Confinada
BSH; 2.00
BSH; 0.50
BSH; 0.00
BSH; 3.00
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
VI VII VIII IX
Tesis Vulnerabilidad Sismica en Mesa RedondaBach. Roberto Rojas Castro (2003)
BSH
Exponencial (BSH)
BSH Values and Modifiers
Reporte para unSismo Leve
_
ACAC 0% 0%
ANCANC 0% 0%
PCP C 0% 0.72%
QAQ A 5.04% 5.04%
TIPO BSHL<0.5 BSHL<1.0
TIPOLOGIAS
Quincha - AdobeQA
Porticos de ConcretoPC
Albañileria No ConfinadaANC
Albañileria ConfinadaAC
LIGHT EARTHQUAKE
Evaluación con BSHMayor BSH menor vulnerabilidad.BSH = 1.0, Prob. 1/10 sea VulnerabilidadBSH = 0.5, Prob. 1/3 sea VulnerabilidadLas Edificaciones con BSH:• Menor a 1.0 necesitan una evaluación mas rigurosa, con gran posibilidad de necesitar reforzamiento.• Menor a 0.5 se encuentran en peligro de colapso.
LIGHT EARTHQUAKE
Reporte para unSismo Moderado
ACAC 0% 0.000
ANCANC 2.88% 2.880
PCPC 7.19% 10.790
QAQA 5.04% 16.550
TIPO BSHM<0.5 BSHM<1.0
TIPOLOGIAS
Quincha - AdobeQA
Porticos de ConcretoPC
Albañileria No ConfinadaANC
Albañileria ConfinadaAC
TIPOLOGIAS
Quincha - AdobeQA
Porticos de ConcretoPC
Albañileria No ConfinadaANC
Albañileria ConfinadaAC
SISMO MODERADO
Evaluación con BSHMayor BSH menor vulnerabilidad.BSH = 1.0, Prob. 1/10 sea VulnerabilidadBSH = 0.5, Prob. 1/3 sea VulnerabilidadLas Edificaciones con BSH:• Menor a 1.0 necesitan una evaluación mas rigurosa, con gran posibilidad de necesitar reforzamiento.• Menor a 0.5 se encuentran en peligro de colapso.
MODERATE EARTHQUAKE
MODERATE EARTHQUAKE
Reporte para unSismo Severo
ACAC 8.63% 28.06%
ANCANC 11.51% 11.51%
PCPC 16.55% 25.18%
Q AQA 22.3% 22.3%
TIPO BSHS<0.5 BSHS<1.0
TIPOLOGIAS
Quincha - AdobeQA
Porticos de ConcretoPC
Albañileria No ConfinadaANC
Albañileria ConfinadaAC
TIPOLOGIAS
Quincha - AdobeQA
Porticos de ConcretoPC
Albañileria No ConfinadaANC
Albañileria ConfinadaAC
Evaluación con BSHMayor BSH menor vulnerabilidad.BSH = 1.0, Prob. 1/10 sea VulnerabilidadBSH = 0.5, Prob. 1/3 sea VulnerabilidadLas Edificaciones con BSH:• Menor a 1.0 necesitan una evaluación mas rigurosa, con gran posibilidad de necesitar reforzamiento.• Menor a 0.5 se encuentran en peligro de colapso.
SEVERE EARTHQUAKE
SEVERE EARTHQUAKE
SeismicSeismic VulnerabilityVulnerability AssessmentAssessmentofof Lima Lima CathedralCathedral
SponsoredSponsored by BCPby BCP
Painting “Panorama de Monroy” (Cusco Cathedral) 31 / 03 / 1650 earthquake
SeismicSeismic VulnerabilityVulnerability AssessmentAssessmentofof Cuzco Cuzco CathedralCathedral
SponsoredSponsored by by TelefonicaTelefonica
Seismic Risk And VulnerabilityAssessment of Insured Buildings
In Lima and Callao(8,000 insured buildings)
SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT (PML) OF INSURED BUILDINGS IN SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT (PML) OF INSURED BUILDINGS IN LIMA AND CALLAOLIMA AND CALLAO
The project was carried out by 80 peopleamong researchers, professionals, graduates,technical personal and administrationpersonal.
Five Task-Groups:- Seismic Hazard – Geotechnical Studies- Vulnerability and Field-Work- Structual Analysis- Informatic - GIS- Seismic Risk.
2 international experts:- Dr. Mario Ordaz-UNAM (México)- Dr. Miguel Herraiz-U Complutense (España)
Spectral Relation(El Remanso-Molina Vieja)
Foto 5. Medicion de Microtrepidaciones en un area libre en el cruce de los jironesMoquegua, Dansey, y Cañete.
Environmental Vibration Measurement(Microtremors)
Spectral Relation H/V San Isidro)
Insured Buildings in San Isidro
SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF INSURED BUILDINGS IN LIMA AND CALLAOSEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF INSURED BUILDINGS IN LIMA AND CALLAO
EDIFICACIONES POR TIPO DE ESTRUCTURA
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
TIPO DE ESTRUCTURA
NU
ME
RO
DE
ED
IFIC
AC
ION
ES
EDIFICACIONES POR NUMERO DE PISOS
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
NUMERO DE PISOS
EDIFICACIONES POR CONSERVACION
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
B R M NE
ESTADO DE CONSERVACION
EDIFICACIONES POR AÑO DE CONSTRUCCION
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
-25 26-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
56-60
61-65
66-70
71-75
76-80
81-85
86-90
91-95
96-00
01- NE
AÑO DE CONSTRUCCION
NU
ME
RO
DE
ED
IFIC
AC
ION
ES
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
NO
IDE
NT
IFIC
AD
OS
CURVA PML Lima-Perú (42 Distritos)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
PERIODO DE RETORNO (Años)
PM
L (%
)
SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF INSURED BUILDINGS IN LIMA AND CALLAOSEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF INSURED BUILDINGS IN LIMA AND CALLAO
• It will be possible to count on a reliable informationsource to analyse and to estimate the vulnerabilityand risk conditions in metropolitan scope, which allowto adress the growing process of the city in betterlevel of safety.
• The study above is a powerful tool to be incorporatedinto the Field Planning and Urban DevelopmentProjects in districtal and provincial level.
Benefits to Lima and Callao Councils :BenefitsBenefits toto Lima Lima andand Callao Callao CouncilsCouncils ::
Benefits to Lima and Callao Councils :BenefitsBenefits toto Lima Lima andand Callao Callao CouncilsCouncils ::
• Base Information to the incorporation of the DisastersPrevention Issues in the Development Projects.
• Currently, International Financial Institutions (BID) demand Prevention studies as a requirement to theDevelopment Projects Evaluation.
• It will be possible to start policies, which consider the“Risk Transfer” (Insurance) in benefit of the local Population.
ConclusionsConclusions
1. Integral studies on vulnerability and seismic risk are required for essential buildings in Lima and other cities.
2. These tasks should be carried out by regional and local governments and scientific institutions related to Preventionand Disasters Mitigation.
3. The outcomes in Lima show the necessity of developmentprojects on seismic vulnerability reduction in essentialbuildings.