sectionii-screeningtesting.ppt

49
Section II Pre-Participation CV Screening and Clinical Exercise Testing

Upload: cardiacinfo

Post on 29-Jun-2015

160 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Section II

Pre-Participation CV Screening and Clinical Exercise Testing

Page 2: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Pre-Participation CV Screening

Purpose of pre-participation screening Components of screening

CH 2 Guidelines PAR-Q Signs and symptoms of CHD – Table 2-1 Risk Factors – Table 2-2 Initial Risk Stratification – Table 2-3

ACSM Guidelines for Screening Table 2-7

Page 3: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Pre-Participation CV Screening

State of the Practice KJM research paper

New AHA/ACSM position paper AHA website

Page 4: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

General Purposes of Exercise Testing (ETT or GXT)(CH5 ACSM Guidelines)

**Evaluate Exercise Capacity** Evaluate functional capacity

VO2 max

Symptom-limited VO2 (SL-VO2)

Peak VO2

Evaluate fitness Pre-post exercise training program

Page 5: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

**EXERCISE TEST FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CAD**

Principle of diagnostic ETT: Ischemic responses such as ST segment

depression and angina indicate the presence of CAD.

Page 6: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Example

Rest Absence of symptoms Normal ECG

During Exercise Symptoms ST depression

Page 7: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Exercise tests used to evaluate patients with a history of chest pain

Typical CP of probable ischemic origin

Atypical Cp of probable non-ischemic origin

Recurrent or worsening angina

Page 8: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Evaluate other symptoms

Dyspnea (shortness of breath)

Syncope (dizziness)

Unusual fatigue

Page 9: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

**ESTIMATE PROGNOSIS AND SEVERITY OF CAD**

Abnormal test results can give an indication of severity of disease (bot not the location of stenosis)

More severe CAD --- poorer long-term prognosis

Page 10: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

ETT Findings Indicating Poorer Prognosis

Limited exercise capacity

Exercise induced hypotension (EIH)

Marked ST depression

Angina with any of the above

Page 11: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

**EVALUATE ARRHYTHMIAS**

Detection of arrhythmias

Assessment of anti-arrhythmia therapy

Page 12: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

**EVALUATION OF THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS**

Pre-post CABG or PTCA to evaluate “revascularization”

Evaluation of medical therapy

Page 13: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

**BASIS FOR EXERCISE PRESCRIPTION***

Determine maximal (peak) heart rate

Determine exercise tolerance

Determine ischemic threshold

Page 14: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

**POST-MI EVALUATIONS**

Pre-discharge activity guidelines

Evaluate prognosis

Page 15: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

MEASUREMENTS DURING THE EET

1. ECG Continuous (oscilloscope) Intervals (each stage of graded test)

Page 16: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

MEASUREMENTS DURING THE EET

2. Heart Rate Each stage Peak exercise Calculate % age predicted maximal

heart rate (APMHR) achieved HR achieved during test / predicted

maximal heart rate (using 220-age) x 100

Page 17: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

MEASUREMENTS DURING THE EET

3. Blood Pressure Each stage Peak exercise Recovery Evaluate normal/abnormal response to

exercise

Page 18: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

MEASUREMENTS DURING THE EET

4. Symptoms and exertion Angina(1-4 scale) RPE Shortness of breath (SOB) Dizziness Other

Page 19: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

MEASUREMENTS DURING THE EET

5. Exercise Duration Use to estimate VO2 max

Sequence for measurements during the EET – Guidelines Table 5-1 pg. 95

Page 20: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

ETT TERMINATION POINTS

ACSM Guidelines – Table 5-4 pg. 97

Page 21: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

INTERPRETATION OF DIAGNOSTIC EXERCISE TEST

CH 6 ACSM GUIDELINESCH 28 RESOURCE MANUAL

Page 22: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS

Positive exercise test *ST segment depression and/or angina

Negative exercise test (“Normal”) for ischemic changes

Page 23: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS

Non-Diagnostic, indeterminate, or inconclusive test results Dependent upon APMHR achieved

Negative exercise test for angina and ischemic ST segment changes at an inadequate peak heart rate

Results of the test can not be used to “rule out” CAD

Page 24: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

(+) TEST RESULTSMARKEDLY (+) and BORDERLINE (+)

Severity of ECG changes Presence and severity of angina Early onset of ischemic changes Normal BP vs. exercise hypotension

Page 25: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY

Terms used to describe how reliable a test distinguishes diseased from non-diseased states.

Guidelines Table 6-16 pg. 140

Page 26: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Sensitivity: A measure of the test’s ability to give a positive (+) result when the subject does have disease.

Specificity: A measure of the test’s ability to give a (-) result when the subject does not have disease.

Page 27: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

“Positive” and “Negative” exercise test results can be compared to angiographic findings:

True Positive (TP): ( ) ETT and ( ) angiogram

True Negative (TN): ( ) ETT and ( ) angiogram

False Positive (FP): ( ) ETT and ( ) angiogram

False Negative (FN): ( ) ETT and ( ) angiogram

Page 28: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Sensitivity: TP / TP X FN X 100

Specificity: TN / TN X FP X 100

Page 29: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Some possible reasons for low Specificity [=high FP]: table 6-18

1. LOW pre-test likelihood of disease Example: women; young age; low risk

factor profile; asymptomatic

2. Abnormal resting ECG Example: ST changes at rest

Page 30: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

3. Medications which affect the ECG Example: digitalis

4. Normal variant Example: ECG has ST segments that

look like ischemic ST depression

Page 31: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Some possible reasons for low Sensitivity: [high FN] table 6-17

1. Inadequate leads monitored

2. Canceling vectors

3. Single vessel disease

Collaterals during exercise

Page 32: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ETT RESULTS

1. Prevalence of disease in the population tested (“Baye’s Theorem”) influences predictive value of ETT results The pre-test likelihood of disease

influences the post-test probability of having the disease

Page 33: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Example: (+) ETT: 50 y/o male; HTN;

hypercholesterolemia; Hx CP with exertion

(+) ETT: 25 y/o female; normal BP; (-) RF’s; asymptomatic

Page 34: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ETT RESULTS

2. Exercise test results influence predictive value

Example: Drastically (+): early onset of ischemic

changes (low workrate and low heart rate) and/or marked ST depression and angina

Page 35: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Severity of ECG changes (ST depression)

Amplitude Example:

• 1mm = borderline• 2mm = moderate• >2mm = severe

Slope Unsloping Horizontal Downsloping

Page 36: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

EXERCISE TESTING MODALITIES and PROTOCOLS

Numerous exercise modalities Treadmill Cycle ergometer Steps Field tests

Numerous protocols Varying MET increments

Page 37: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

“Graded Protocols”

Vary speed (mph) of walking & grade (% inclination) in stages (usually 2-3 min)

Page 38: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Commonly used treadmill protocols:

(standard) Bruce Modified Bruce Balke Naughton Modified Astrand Ramp protocols Ellestad Individualized Ramp tests

Page 39: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

General characteristics of treadmill protocols:

Continuous Multistage (“graded”) Start low MET level (2-3 METS) Increase workrate 1-3 METS/stage Last between 6-15 minutes Use large muscle groups Do not require significant skill

Page 40: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Testing protocol should be appropriate for the person being tested

Example: athlete vs. early post-MI

Page 41: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

TREADMILL PROTOCOLS

Standard Bruce – diverse Modified Bruce – low-moderate exercise

tolerance and/or difficulty with gait Balke – avg. to above avg. fitness levels Naughton – severely limited exercise

tolerance RAMP – low level to athletic protocols

Page 42: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

CYCLE VS. TREADMILL EXERCISE TESTS

Page 43: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

1. ADVANTAGES OF CYCLE:

Portable Quiet and less upper extremity

movement Easier to assess BP ECG may show less artifact Important for persons with difficulty

with gait

Page 44: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

2. DISADVANTAGES OF CYCLE

Underestimate VO2 max and HR max

(a) Unfamiliarity with cycling

(b) smaller muscle mass

Page 45: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

3. SENSITIVITY TO DETECT CAD

No significant difference

Page 46: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

MAXIMAL EXERCISE TESTS

PREDICTION EQUATIONS USED FOR THE ESTIMATION OF VO2 MAX

Page 47: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Estimation of VO2 max based on actual (direct) measures of VO2

Physiologic Principle of Estimating VO2 max: VO2 is directly related to workrate,

therefore, estimations of VO2 max can be made on standardized tests by determining the highest workrate that can be achieved and calculating the energy cost of that power output.

Page 48: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Estimation can result in large potential errors:

Non-Standardization Hand held exercise vs. non-hand held Population specific equations Inappropriate test endpoints Familiarization

Page 49: SectionII-ScreeningTesting.ppt

Protocol specific equations:

EXAMPLE: Bruce treadmill: Males: VO2 max = 3.88 + [.056 x (time-

sec)] Female: VO2 max = 1.26 + [.056 x

(time-sec)]