section xiii capacity management / throughput
TRANSCRIPT
Section XIIICapacity Management / Throughput
Summary of Recommendations• Assessment Methodology • Observations of Patient Throughput Processes• Common ThemesAssessment and Recommendations• Case Management and Nursing • Ancillary Services • Bed Assignment• Emergency DepartmentImplementation Plan and Methodology• Patient Throughput and Capacity Management – Next Steps• Patient Throughput Optimization – Implementation Plan – Phase 1
– Phase I: Case Management/Social Work– Phase I: Bed Control/Nursing Supervisors
• Patient Throughput Optimization – Implementation Plan – Phase 2– Phase II: Inpatient Nursing – Phase II: Ancillary Services
• Patient Throughput Optimization – Implementation Plan – Phase 3– Phase III: Emergency Department
• Financial Impact• Key Components for Success
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 2
Summary of Recommendations
Case Management• Reorganize Case Management/Utilization Review/Social Work/Pre-Auth to report to one Director.• Shift current Case Management model from a UR focus to a Care Coordination focus.• Determine service-specific needs for rounding practices that support discharge planning needs for
patient population.• Develop communication systems involving all care givers and family in coordination of patient
discharge.• Evaluate post-acute placement needs quickly during patient stay and communicate to the patient
and family the importance of planning for the post-acute care.• Implement processes during evening resident rounds to capture patients for anticipated discharge
the next morning – flag these patients to be discussed first during am teaching rounds, and encourage physicians to write orders during rounds.
• Implement clinical roadmaps for key high-volume DRGs.• Collaborate with physician leadership to improve outlying LOS with physician report cards.
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 3
Summary of Recommendations
Nursing• Establish Patient Throughput Steering Committee to meet on a bi-weekly basis, at a minimum, to
hear reports from front-line management involved in the patient throughput initiative and to discuss roadblocks and action plans.
• Determine official “Discharge Time” – most effective time should be before noon – and communicate expectations to all caregivers, patients and families.
• Reorganize daily “Bed Meeting” to plan for all admissions including surgical volume, cath lab procedures that convert to inpatients, clinic patients, Emergency Department admissions, etc.
• Implement accountability systems to include bed management metrics on each nursing unit and with all services that support patient movement.
• Define and implement incentive program to identify beds quickly at the front-line staff level.• Implement “day before discharge” notice program on all nursing units and develop accountability
systems to measure use of program.• Implement special flagging of lab tests, diagnostic procedures, and other support services for
improved response time for patients pending discharge.• Evaluate options for enhancing patient flow and proper utilization of Extended Stay Recovery Area,
Observation Unit, Clinical Decision Unit and specific discharge area for post-partum patients.
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 4
Summary of Recommendations
Ancillary • Laboratory
– Project capacity of phlebotomist draws based on current staffing and collection times.– Implement special flagging of lab tests for improved response time for patients pending
discharge.– Document and trial a “best practice” phlebotomy collection run.
• Radiology– Project capacity for each section based on current staffing and equipment.– It is necessary for IT to support a special flagging of diagnostic procedures in Lab and
Radiology for pre-discharged patients to improve response time for pending discharges.– Analyze no-show, add-ons, cancellations, I/P, OP, ED, walk-ins and scheduled patients by
day for trending.• Environmental Services
– Implement discharge notification system in all areas to allow prioritization of patients.– Assess staff understanding and compliance of the bed notification and cleaning process.– Implement quality, service, and cost measurement and reporting system.
• Transport– Negotiate with external customers on expectations of service; measure and report frequently.– Develop and assign specific downtime duties.
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 5
Summary of Recommendations
Bed Assignment• Define specific role for “Patient Flow Coordinator” to oversees all bed requests. • Redefine roles and responsibilities of bed assignment team.• Implement one large “Bed Board” to visualize all beds in the hospital simultaneously – begin with
a manual magnetic bed board before progressing to a more sophisticated electronic system.• Implement “one-call” system for physicians to call for direct admission of patients into hospital.• Develop process to plan for bed assignment needs using “Future Scheduled Admissions”
information in SMS.• Define and implement incentive program to identify beds quickly at the front-line staff level.• Pursue opportunities to align supply and demand of beds by service.Emergency Department• Engage key physician leaders in addressing the physician practice delays in the ED.• Develop a strong senior management message around the sense of urgency in improving patient
throughput and the role it will play in solidifying the future of UNC Hospital.• Develop and implement a core set of performance metrics and targets to increase awareness and
accountability around the patient throughput process.• Implement an organization-wide “trigger system” with clear action expectations for each patient
throughput process stakeholder during high census days and periods of ED overflow.• Conduct a detailed analysis of ED volume trends and the feasibility of utilizing the Peds ED area
as an alternate care setting to enhance patient flow.
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 6
Assessment Methodology
• Face-to-face interviews of key stakeholders in patient throughput processes• Observation of processes that impact patient throughput• Data collection and analysis
Assessment
Financial Technical CulturalTargets
Budget
Long-range Plan
Reports
Management Tools
Systems
Leadership Effectiveness
Communication Methods
Cultural Strengths
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 7
Observations of Patient Throughput Processes
• Nursing supervisor staffing meeting at 9:00 AM and 5:30 PM.• Patient discharge processes on various nursing units.• Day shift nursing report.• Day shift Charge Nurse report.• Health Unit Coordinator (HUC) and RN taking off patient orders (stat, d/c, routine).• Request for new admission process.• Multidisciplinary discharge meeting on various nursing units.• Environmental services rounds.• Bed assignment processes from bed request to official bed assignment.• Patient Transport process for a discharged patient.• Interdisciplinary rounds with various services.• Emergency Department patient flow from triage through to disposition and discharge.• CT and MRI patient flow and scheduling processes.• Laboratory drawing processes during critical early morning hours.• Inter-departmental communication methods.
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 8
Patient Throughput is a Continuous Cycle
PatientThroughput
Cycle
DischargePlanning
MD order to Discharge
Communicationof Actual
Discharge
Bed Turnaroundby Housekeeping
Decision to Admit
Registration/Bed Mgmt/
Authorization Communicate to Send/Receive
Areas
Patient Placement to Bed
Financial Verification
ActualPatient
Discharge
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 9
Patient Throughput Interdependency
Social Workers RN Bed Managers
RN Case Managers
Admitting/Financial Reps
Communication
RN/Charge RN
Communication
Com
mun
icat
ion
Com
munication
EV Services
Ancillary ServicesPhysician/PA
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 10
Patient Throughput Structural Design
Discharge Process
Bed ManagementProcess
PlanningComponent
ExecutionComponent
Turnover /Bed Cycle
Assignment /Patient
Placement
Meaningful and measurable performance metrics
Structured and streamlined communication
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 11
Common Themes
• Workarounds for patient placement results in off-service patients on many units throughout the hospital, e.g., dialysis patient will be on a general medical floor.
• Lack of a consistent message for patient throughput, particularly as it relates to a discharge process and an official “discharge time.”
• No sense of urgency for discharging patients early in the day.• Rounding practices do not support an early patient discharge.
[Portions of this page are confidential and have been redacted.]
Case Management and Nursing – Assessment
Discharge Process
PlanningComponent
ExecutionComponent
[Portions of the Assessment are confidential and have been redacted.]
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 13
University of North Carolina HospitalDischarges by Time of Day
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300
# of
Dis
char
ges
Discharges
September 20 -26, 2004
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 14
University of North Carolina Hospital NSICU Patient Flow for Transfers Out
900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900
Patient A
Patient B
Patient C
Patient D
Time from order written to bed assigned Time from bed assigned to patient moved
Goal is to have a bed assignedwithin 15 minutes of notification
and transfer a patient within1 hour of receiving the bed
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 15
University of North Carolina Hospital 3 West “Cold Bed Study”
800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200
Ideal
32121
32011
32171
32341
32331
32071
32061
32341
32072
32122
Time from Order to D/C Time from D/C to Assigned Time from Assigned to Occupied
Goal is to d/c within 2 hours of order,respond to routine clean within 30 minutes,
average room clean is 30 minutes, thenmove new patient in within 1 hour of
assignment
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 16
University of North Carolina HospitalSample Quality Metrics
INDICATORS
Area Indicator Definition Standard Frequency
Floors Discharge within 2 hours of the order
Discharges will be complete within 2 hours of the written order 2 hours Daily
Floors % of Discharges out by 11 am
Comparison of the number of discharges out by 11 AM and total discharges 11 am Daily
Floors Admission Time Admissions will be accepted to the unit within 1 hour of notification 1 hour Daily
Floors Transfer Turnaround Time
Transfers will be complete within 1 hour of notification 1 hour Daily
Environmental Bed Cleaning Turnaround Time
Measuring the time from notification of needed cleaning to actual start of cleaning 30 minutes Daily
Environmental Stat Bed Cleaning Measuring the time from notification of needed cleaning to actual start of cleaning 15 minutes Daily
PACU Excessive Stay Measuring the time from patient ready to leave PACU until actual transfer time Daily
ED Excessive stay Measuring the time from patient ready to leave ED until actual transfer out time Daily
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 17
University of North Carolina Hospital3 West Quality Metrics
% of Patients D/C by 11 am
7.7% 8.3%0.0%
40.0%
0.0%0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
9/22/2004 9/23/2004 9/24/2004 9/25/2004 9/26/2004
% of Patients D/C by 11 am Target
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 18
University of North Carolina Hospital3 West Quality Metrics
% of Patients D/C within 2 hours of Order
30.8%
41.7%
25.0%
70.0%
50.0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
9/22/2004 9/23/2004 9/24/2004 9/25/2004 9/26/2004
% of Patients D/C within 2 hours of Order Target
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 19
University of North Carolina Hospital3 West Quality Metrics
% of Patients Transferred Out within 1 hour
50.0%
33.0%
100.0%
0.0% 0.0%0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
9/22/2004 9/23/2004 9/24/2004 9/25/2004 9/26/2004
% of Patients Transferred out within 1 hour Target
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 20
University of North Carolina Hospital3 West Quality Metrics
% of Patients Transferred In / Admitted within 1 hour
27.3% 25.0%16.7%
45.5% 42.9%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
9/22/2004 9/23/2004 9/24/2004 9/25/2004 9/26/2004
% of Patients Transferred in / Admitted within 1 hour Target
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 21
University of North Carolina Hospital3 West Quality Metrics
Orders by Service
0
5
10
15
20
25
Fam Med A Med B Med E Med G Med K Med W0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
# D/C # of Orders % of Orders by 11 am
Main Admitting Services for 3 West
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 22
Case Management – Recommendations
• Reorganize Case Management/Utilization Review/Social Work/Pre-Auth to report to one Director.• Shift current Case Management model from a Utilization Review focus to a Care Coordination
focus.• Evaluate current role of CM in the ED and implement changed to ensure most efficient use of this
resource.• Identify and hire VPMA as a “Physician Champion” to support care coordination efforts and
interface with physician groups.• Determine service-specific needs for rounding practices that support discharge planning needs for
patient population.• Develop communication systems to involve all care givers and family in coordination of patient
discharge.• Evaluate post-acute placement needs as soon as possible during the patient stay and
communicate to the patient and family the importance of planning for the post-acute care.• Evaluate feasibility of Hospitalist program to enhance timeliness of patient care.• Implement processes during evening resident rounds to capture patients for anticipated discharge
the next morning – flag these patients to be discussed first during AM teaching rounds, and encourage physicians to write orders during rounds.
• Determine best methods for daily communication to patients and families regarding anticipated day of discharge and discharge needs -begin communication on the first day of a patient’s stay.
• Implement clinical roadmaps for key high volume DRGs.• Collaborate with physician leadership to improve outlying LOS with physician report cards.
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 23
Case Management Model
• All areas report to one director.• Implement VPMA role to support CRM.• Case Manager role.
– Utilize RNs as Case Managers.– Divide services or geographic units based on needs.
• 1 Case Manager per 25 to 30 patients.– Each Case Manager would be responsible for all aspects of the patient coordination.
• Utilization review of all new admissions.• Review every three days and as requested by payer.• Utilize Interqual criteria as a basis in determining LOS. • Initiate discharge planning on day of admission.• Coordinate discharge needs with Social Worker.• Manage cases as determined by medical condition.• Appropriate placement of patients on the front-end.
• Dedicated Case Managers to be responsible for coding and documentation support.• Social Workers continue to manage all psychosocial needs and discharge needs.
– 1 Social Worker per 30 to 40 patients.• Clerical support would be utilized for faxing, calling and coordinating paperwork.• Transition to a Case Management Model with a Resource Center.
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 24
Nursing – Recommendations
• Establish Patient Throughput Steering Committee to meet on a bi-weekly basis, at a minimum, to hear reports from front-line management involved in the patient throughput initiative and to discuss roadblocks and action plans.
• Determine official “Discharge Time” – most effective time should be before noon – and communicate expectations to all caregivers, patients, and families.
• Reorganize daily “Bed Meeting” to plan for all admissions including surgical volume, cath lab procedures that convert to inpatients, clinic patients, Emergency Department admissions, etc.
– Meeting should be limited to 15 minutes.– Meeting should occur each am, shortly after physician rounds.– Emergency bed meetings should occur when there is the possibility of refusing admissions.
• Implement accountability systems to include bed management metrics on each nursing unit and with all services that support patient movement.
• Define and implement incentive program to identify beds quickly at the front-line staff level.• Implement “day before discharge” notice program on all nursing units and develop accountability
systems to measure use of program.– Work with physicians to establish unit specific expectations.
• Implement special flagging of lab tests, diagnostic procedures, and other support services for improved response time for patients pending discharge.
• Evaluate the following options for enhancing patient flow and proper utilization of such units –Extended Stay Recovery Area, Observation Unit, Clinical Decision Unit.
• Evaluate need for specific discharge area for post-partum patients.
Ancillary Services – Assessment
Discharge Process
ExecutionComponent
Bed ManagementProcess
Turnover /Bed Cycle
[Portions of the Assessment are confidential and have been redacted.]
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 26
Ancillary Support – Radiology
4
6
16
1 1 1 1 1
3 3 3
7
3 3 3 3
0
4
8
12
16
20
CT MRI US MammoScreening
MammoDiagnostic
Fluoro Nuc Med PET
Day
s
Days to First Available Appointment Industry Standard
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 27
Ancillary Support – Radiology
MRI Days to first Available Appointment - Outpatient
Increased efficiency with outpatient scheduling may
impact inpatient cases12
15 15
13
11
9 9
6
9
7
9
6
15
7
16
18
1415
12
89
1110
8
1514
12
15
12 12 12
6
8
10
54
0
4
8
12
16
20
'7/27 8/2 8/10 8/17 8/23 8/30 9/7 9/13 9/17 9/27 10/4 10/11
Day
s
Inhouse MRI ACC MRI SedationsSource: Scheduling Delays Report received from Radiology
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 28
Ancillary Support – Radiology
Ultrasound - Days to First Available Appointment
The increase in US volume may start impacting inpatient flow due to the fact
that inpatients are slotted in open areas around the outpatients
3 3
8
5 53
8
54
8
1416
0
4
8
12
16
20
'7/27 8/2 8/10 8/17 8/23 8/30 9/7 9/13 9/17 9/27 10/4 10/11
Day
s
Days to First Available AppointmentSource: Scheduling Delays Report received from Radiology
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 29
3 3 3
1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
CT MRI US Diagnostic
Hou
rs
IP Average Response Time
Ancillary Support – Radiology
Source: Interviews with Management and Area Supervisors
Inpatient Response Time From Requisition to Start of Exam
Need to determine by nursing unit reasonable expectations to allow for optimal inpatient flow
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 30
Ancillary Support – Lab
Source: OP wait time received from lab
Outpatient Wait TimesMain Hospital*
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun% o
f pat
ient
s w
aitin
g <1
5min
from
ar
rival
tim
e
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 31
Ancillary Support – Lab
Source: Result Turn Around Reports received from lab Includes all sites but excludes Urinalysis and Troponin
Routine Test Turn Around Time
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
% o
f rou
tine
test
s co
mpl
eted
by
the
targ
eted
tim
e
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 32
Ancillary Support – Lab
Source: Result Turn Around Reports received from lab Includes all sites but excludes Urinalysis and Troponin
Stat Test Turn Around Time
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun% o
f sta
t tes
ts c
ompl
eted
by
the
targ
eted
tim
e
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 33
Ancillary Support – Lab
Urinalysis and Troponin are the only exceptions to the routines and stats
meeting their targets – Urinalysis is not far from the target
Unrinalysis
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun% o
f sta
t tes
ts c
ompl
eted
by
the
targ
eted
tim
e
Routine Stat Target
Source: Result Turn Around Reports received from lab
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 34
Ancillary Support – Lab
Troponin Turn Around Time
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun% o
f tro
poni
ns c
ompl
eted
by
the
targ
eted
tim
e
Day Shift Evening Shift Night Shift TargetSource: Result Turn Around Reports received from lab
Urinalysis and Troponin are the only exceptions to the routines
and stats meeting their targets –Lab is aware troponin is not
meeting the target and is working on resolution
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 35
Ancillary Support – Environmental Services
July 4-July 10, 2004
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Average Rooms Cleaned Average EVS Room Cleaning Staff Total EVS Staff
Clean Beds Vs. Staffing by Time of Day
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 36
Ancillary Support – Patient Transport Services
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Pending Response Volume
Transport Response Time
Transport is reporting incomplete response time starting when the transport is assigned. What are the customer’s
expectations? Volume is relatively flat, why is the pending + response time rising?
Min
uets
Volume
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 37
Ancillary Support – Patient Transport Services
The majority of delays are coded as “Nursing”: is this a response to time it takes from request to patient transport? Are there differences in expectations between Transport and Nursing?
Transportation Services DelaysAug. 2004
Doctor Delay12.12%
Nursing Delay53.02%
Unit Patient0.03%
Transportation Delay3.73%
Wrong Info Given1.99%
Equipment Delay6.59%
Patient In Restroom22.52%
Average Mins. Per Delay 12.1Percentage of Jobs with Delay 10.4%Total Delay Hours 171
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 38
Ancillary Support
Operational Effectiveness - Timely Deliverable Lab PhysicalTherapy Radiology EVS Transport
Preliminary/Final Report
Evaluation/Treatment
Clean Room
Transport
• Radiology: A report generation system that does not require gaps of time in between steps (in process of implementing a voice recognition system)
• PT: Prioritizing patients and leaving some for the next day• EVS: Bulk of discharges occur when least amount of EVS discharge staff is working• Transport: Huge fluctuations in workload from minute-to-minute
Challenges
Positive current state, needs little improvementNeutral current state, needs some improvement
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 39
Ancillary Support – Physical Therapy
Referral Response Time
48
24 24
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Old Target New Target Actual
Hou
rs
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 40
Ancillary Support
Proactive Management System Lab PhysicalTherapy Radiology EVS Transport
Identified/Measured Service Indicators
Target Comparison
Reporting Mechanism
Documented Proactive Approach to Outliers
Diagnosis of Issues Using Objective Data
Resolution Trials
Successful Implementations
• Indicators that are meaningful and that drive day-to-day decision making• Measuring too many or not enough indicators• Challenging or realistic targets • Staff understanding and buy-in to indicators• Believable information (perception versus reality)• Resolution trial that was ineffective – what next?
Challenges
Negative current state, needs much improvement
Positive current state, needs little improvementNeutral current state, needs some improvement
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 41
Ancillary Support
Department Culture Lab PhysicalTherapy Radiology EVS Transport
Morale
Leadership skills and implementation abilities
Staff involved in issue identification and resolution
Staff educated and involved in indicators measured, expectations and results
Department recognizes/responds to internal and external customers needs
Builds good relationships with customer departments
• Balancing quality, service and cost• Never ending demand for faster service• Differing and changing expectations from internal and external customers• Managing time to include issue resolution
Challenges
Negative current state, needs much improvement
Positive current state, needs little improvementNeutral current state, needs some improvement
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 42
Ancillary Support – Recommendations
Laboratory• Project capacity of phlebotomist draws based on current staffing and collection times.• Implement special flagging of lab tests for improved response time for patients pending discharge.• Document and trial a “best practice” phlebotomy collection run.• Incorporate order to lab received time by area into measurements and reporting.Radiology• Project capacity for each section based on current staffing and equipment.• It is necessary for IT to support a special flagging of diagnostic procedures in Lab and Radiology for pre-discharged
patients to improve response time for pending discharges.• Analyze no-show, add-ons, cancellations, I/P, O/P, ED, walk-ins and scheduled patients by day for trending.• Evaluate the need to adjust scheduling based on objective data.• Add staff managed measurements relating to quality, service and budget by area.Physical Therapy• Assess use/completion/follow-up of referral trigger within the patient assessment.• Implement discharge notification system in all areas to allow prioritization of patients.Environmental Services• Evaluate roles/responsibilities of staff and time of day for assignments.• Assess staff understanding and compliance of the bed notification and cleaning process.• Implement quality, service, and cost measurement and reporting system. • Define “stat” bed clean and who should be responsible for determining a “stat” status.Transport• Negotiate with external customers on expectations of service – measure and report frequently.• Develop and assign specific downtime duties.• Identify a secure location for equipment storage.
Bed Assignment – Assessment
Bed ManagementProcess
Turnover /Bed Cycle
Assignment /Patient
Placement
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 44
Bed Management
Bed Assignment NursingSupervisors
BedAssignment
Advance bed planning for surgical patients
Considers all possible areas for bed needs
Role in moving patients
Aware of potential discharges
Compare potential discharges with beds needed
Follow up on potential discharges
Effective Bed Management Meeting
Clear prioritization of patients in the bed assignment process
Efficient and coordinated computer systems for bed management
Efficient bed assignment process for specialty beds
• 11 computer screens to be reviewed when placing a patient• Lack of planning/trending of admissions from ED, Direct, Clinics, Cath Lab, other facilities• Required volume vs. available volume of private rooms• Need for one person to be in charge of prioritizing all patient moves (transfers, admissions, discharges)• Lack of accountability system to enforce a streamlined patient throughput process
Challenges
Negative current state, needs much improvement
Positive current state, needs little improvementNeutral current state, needs some improvement
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 45
Bed Management
Direct Admit Process Admitting
Easy access for direct admits
Timely registration process for direct admits upon arrival
Timely bed assignment process
Rapid delivery of care
User-friendly direct admit process for doctors and patients
Direct admit process that keeps direct admits out of the ED
• Long waits for bed assignments due to prioritization going to Surgery and ED, and time of discharges• Lack of constant communication and coordination with clinics and patients waiting at home • When a patient waits at home, they will typically go to the bottom of the priority list• Providing care and a comfortable space for patients waiting for a bed assignment• Inability for Physicians to order testing while patient is waiting for bed assignment
Challenges
Negative current state, needs much improvement
Positive current state, needs little improvementNeutral current state, needs some improvement
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 46
Bed Assignment Continuous Cycle
Bed assigned Bed assigned at any stage of at any stage of
the processthe process
Reviews multiple Reviews multiple screens of patientsscreens of patients
waiting for bed assignmentswaiting for bed assignmentsReferrals entered Referrals entered
in SMS in SMS
Review multiple screens byReview multiple screens byFloor for bed availabilityFloor for bed availability
Review TeleReview Tele--Tracking for Tracking for further bed assignmentfurther bed assignment
Bed Notification & Identification
Process
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 47
University of North Carolina Hospital Planning for Hospital Patient In-Flow
InpatientBed
Outpt.Procedure
ERAdmit
Day Surgery
CathLab
SurgeryAdmit
DirectAdmit
• Gray indicates currently planned volume.
• Red indicates other access areas where the admissions are not being planned for on a daily basis.
Clinic Admit
Trans. from other Hosp.
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 48
Bed Assignment – Recommendations
• Define specific role for “Patient Flow Coordinator” to oversee all bed requests. • Redefine roles and responsibilities of bed assignment team.• Implement one large “Bed Board” to visualize all beds in the hospital simultaneously – begin with
a manual magnetic bed board before progressing to a more sophisticated electronic system.• Evaluate need for new technology in Bed Assignment area to allow increased visibility of beds
and eliminate cumbersome bed assignment processes.• Implement “one call” system for physicians to call for direct admission of patients into hospital.• Develop process to plan for bed assignment needs using “Future Scheduled Admissions”
information in SMS.• Develop and implement communication system to gather all necessary information required for
proper bed assignment.• Determine most effective method to determine beds that are out of service.• Define and implement incentive program to identify beds quickly at the front-line staff level.• Pursue opportunities to align supply and demand of beds by service.
Emergency Department – Assessment
Bed ManagementProcess
Assignment /Patient
Placement
[Portions of the Assessment are confidential and have been redacted.]
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 50
University of North Carolina HospitalMain ED Census and IP Bed Request by Time of Day
June 13, 2004
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
3 0
3 5
0 :0 0 1 :0 0 2 :0 0 3 :0 0 4 :0 0 5 :00 6 :0 0 7 :0 0 8 :0 0 9 :0 0 1 0 :0 0 1 1 :0 0 1 2 :0 0 1 3 :0 0 1 4 :0 0 1 5 :0 0 1 6 :0 0 1 7 :0 0 1 8 :0 0 1 9 :0 0 2 0 :0 0 2 1 :0 0 2 2 :0 0 2 3 :0 0
T im e o f D a y
Cen
su
0
1
2
3
Inp
ati
ent
Bed
Req
M ain E D C en s u s A v g # o f IP B ed R eq 's to B ed C trl
C rit ic a l p a t ie n t flo w d e la y p o in ts / P a t ie n t d is s a t is fie r
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 51
University of North Carolina HospitalMain ED Transfers by Time of Day
June 2004 Average
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:0
0
11:0
0
12:0
0
13:0
0
14:0
0
15:0
0
16:0
0
17:0
0
18:0
0
19:0
0
20:0
0
21:0
0
22:0
0
23:0
0
Time of Day
Cen
sus
Admitted Patient ED Transfers
Majority of transfers occur during late evening and night shift
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 52
University of North Carolina HospitalED Treat and Release Patient Experience
Actual Patient Chart DataAugust 23, 2004
0:24 0:02 0:27 0:10 3:14
0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00
T&R Patient "A"
Check-In to Triage Triage to Reg Time Reg Time to ED Bed ED Bed to Assessment Time Assessment to Discharge Time
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 53
University of North Carolina HospitalED Admitted Patient Experience
Actual Patient Chart DataAugust 23, 2004
0:41 2:59 3:54 0:36
0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00
Admitted Patient "B"
ED Bed to Assessment Time Assessment Time to Bed Ctrl Request Bed Ctrl Request to Bed Assignment Bed Assignment to ED Transfer
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 54
University of North Carolina HospitalCurrent vs. Potential Emergency Department LOS
Current = June 2004 Average
3:00
4:00
1:06
2:36
0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00
Treat & Release LOS
Admitted Pt LOS
Target LOS Current Excess LOS
This potential Admit LOS improvement equates to 101 additional hrs of ED capacity per day
This potential T & R LOS improvement equates to 61 additional hrs of ED capacity per day
+
= 162 add'l hrs capacity or 47 add'l pts/day at target blended LOS
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 55
Emergency Department – Recommendations
• Develop a strong senior management message around the sense of urgency in improving patient throughput and the role it will play in solidifying the future of UNCH.
• Develop and implement a core set of performance metrics and targets to increase awareness and accountability around the patient throughput process.
• Develop a recognition program that highlights the department/unit specific improvements made in key patient throughput performance metrics on a monthly basis.
• Analyze delay reason details for all ED patient intervals.• Implement an organization-wide “trigger system” with clear action expectations for each patient
throughput process stakeholder during high census days and periods of ED overflow.• Conduct a detailed analysis of ED volume trends and the feasibility of utilizing the Peds ED area
as an alternate care setting to enhance patient flow.
[Portions of the Recommendations are confidential and have been redacted.]
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 56
Implementation Plan – Implementation Methodology
ASSESSProject “Blueprint” Development• Outline the strategic implementation plan for the project • Ensure that all initiatives move the organization toward achieving the core set of improvement goals
ANALYZEDetailed Operational Analysis• Focus intensely on operational, financial and performance trends• Initiate the implementation of the Organizational Accountability System• Implement meaningful performance indicators that truly reflect the department’s day-to-day
operations
CONFIRMPerformance Reporting Matrix Design and Implementation• Pilot new initiatives • Install a Performance Reporting Matrix • Monitor outcomes to clarify the impact and provide direction for further implementation • Customize management systems and processes while focusing on leadership development
COMMITFinalize Organizational Accountability System (OAS)• Set performance targets • Finalize performance management tools, performance and leadership metrics• Firm up streamlined, timely reporting processes
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 57
• Communicate message to all staff of overall hospital patient throughput philosophy and importance of participation at all levels of the organization.
• Develop project goals and objectives.• Initiate a project structure.
– Patient Throughput Steering Committee– Manager/Director level biweekly update meetings– Front-line staff driven workgroups
• Establish a data tracking system and baseline metrics.– Metrics must be measurable– Metrics must be timely– Metrics must be meaningful– Metrics must be simple
• Determine methods and sources for data collection.• Initiate process change trials and measure success/failure based on established metrics.• Communicate and provide feedback.
Patient Throughput and Capacity Management Next Steps
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 58
Implementation
IMPLEMENTATION PLANPHASE I: STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENTFOCUS AREAS• Case Management• Social Work• Bed Control• Nursing Supervisors
PHASE II: DISCHARGE PROCESS OPTIMIZATIONFOCUS AREAS• I/P Nursing Units• Environmental Services• PACU (limited focus)• Ancillary Services (limited focus)
PHASE III: PATIENT IN-FLOW OPTIMIZATIONFOCUS AREAS• Emergency Department
Weeks 1 - 18
Weeks 9 - 26
Weeks 19 - 36
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 59
Patient Throughput Optimization – Implementation Plan – Phase 1
Objectives• Develop and implement an enhanced patient throughput management structure and accountability
system.• Develop and implement a multi-disciplinary Care Coordination model.
Focus Areas• Case Management• Social Work• Bed Assignment• Nursing Supervisors
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 60
Implementation Action Plan – Phase ICase Management/Social Work
Phase I Project Weeks
CASE MANAGEMENT/SOCIAL WORK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Establish key performance indicators, initial performance targets and reporting process / frequency
Identify performance improvement initiative leaders and focused improvement team members
Set meeting structure for the project for both initiative-level work teams and senior mg progress reports
Identify DRGs targeted for improvement
Assess current care coordination model and discharge planning processes and the impact on patient flow
Study the roles of CM, Physicians, Nursing and Support Services in the LOS management process
Review Communication processes between Case Management staff and Nursing, Medical Staff, Pt/Family, Support Services & Referral Contacts
Analyze clinical practice patterns and cultural issues that impact the ability to optimize LOS
Review clinical pathway utilization
Review opportunities to streamline the clinical documentation process
Analyze managed care denials and related financial impact
Assess appeal and revenue recovery processes associated with managed care denials
Establish and implement care maps for specific "opportunity" DRGs identified within the top 50
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 61
Implementation Action Plan – Phase IBed Control/Nursing Supervisors
Phase I Project Weeks
BED CONTROL/NURSING SUPERVISORS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Establish key performance indicators, initial performance targets and reporting process / frequency
Identify performance improvement initiative leaders and focused improvement team members
Implement an interim bed board solution - magnetic board with all beds in service
Develop and implement improvement strategies related to bed assignment process roadblocks by patient type
Track and analyze bed assignment delay reasons by patient type
Pursue opportunities to align supply and demand of beds by service
Develop clear bed assignment guidelines by patient type
Develop and implement an enhanced process that decreases the cycle time from communication of bed needs – room clean – bed assignment – patient transfer/admission
Assist in the selection and implementation process of an electronic bed board application (if necessary)
Senior Management Progress Report
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 62
Patient Throughput Optimization – Implementation Plan – Phase 2
Objectives• Develop and implement an enhanced multi-disciplinary discharge planning and execution
process.
Focus Areas• Inpatient nursing units, including Women and Children’s (39 total units – excluding Psychiatry and
Rehabilitation)• Environmental Services
More Limited Focus• PACU• Ancillary Services – Lab, Radiology, Physical Therapy, Cath Lab
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 63
Implementation Action Plan – Phase IIInpatient Nursing (39 Targeted Nursing Units)
Phase II Project Weeks
INPATIENT NURSING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Establish key performance indicators, initial performance targets and reporting process/frequency
Identify performance improvement initiative leaders and focused improvement team members
Set meeting structure for the project for both initiative-level work teams and senior mgt progress reports
Analyze unit-specific patient mix and develop appropriate patient flow expectations and performance indicators
Develop and implement unit-specific tools to track key patient flow and discharge indicators
Develop and implement a daily day before discharge planning and communication process
Establish and implement a formalized discharge process and targeted discharge time
Establish a process to identify and communicate discharge needs upon admission
Implement a daily review process for pending discharges, and required action
Implement a special flagging of lab tests, diagnostic proceduresand other ancillary services for improved response time
Define and implement an incentive program to identify beds quickly at the front-line staff level
Evaluate the following options for enhancing patient flow: extended stay recovery area, Observation Unit, Clinical DecisionUnit, Discharge Lounge
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 64
Implementation Action Plan – Phase IIAncillary Services
Phase II Project Weeks
ANCILLARY SERVICES 9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Establish key performance indicators, initial performance targets and reporting process/frequency
Identify performance improvement initiative leaders and focused improvement team members
Set meeting structure for the project for both initiative-level work teams and senior management progress reports
Evaluate roles, responsibilities of staff and assignment methodology by shift
Assess staff knowledge and compliance of their role in patient throughput
Align staffing levels and work load by time of day to support optimal patient flow
Senior Management Progress Report
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 65
Patient Throughput Optimization – Implementation Plan – Phase 3
Objectives• Decrease the I/P delays from the ED.• Optimize the patient throughput experience within the ED.
Focus Areas• Emergency Department
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 66
Implementation Action Plan – Phase IIIEmergency Department
Phase III Project Weeks
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Establish key performance indicators, initial performance targets and reporting process/ frequency
Identify performance improvement initiative leaders and focused improvement team members
Set meeting structure for the project for both initiative-level work teams and senior mgt progress reports
Prioritize and implement improvement strategies for delay reasons for "patient in-room – disposition: patient flow
Prioritize and implement improvement strategies for delay reasons for "disposition - bed assignment“ patient flow interval
Prioritize and implement improvement strategies for delay reasons for "bed assignment - transfer" patient flow interval
Develop and implement clear expectations and indicators for timely Nursing - ED communication on IP transfers
Analyze current ED treatment philosophy and its impact on patient flow (compare to best practice)
Perform a feasibility study on utilizing the Peds ED area as an alternative care area to enhance patient flow
Senior Management Progress Report
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 67
Financial Impact
Opportunity Description Operational Impact Financial Impact Comments
Direct Financial Benefit and Impact on ROI
Decrease excessive days
Decrease excessive days by 12,000 to
14,500$4.2 M to $5.1M
Projected opportunity represents impacting total excessive days by 50% to 60% at a savings of $350 per day.
Back-fill opportunity
Additional capacity for 1,300 to 1.600 potential additional discharges
$5.5M to $6.6M
Opportunity calculation based on an estimated contribution margin/case of $4,123 per an analysis completed by Decision Support. Feasibility of back-fill opportunity will be analyzed during the implementation phase.
ED Length of Stay Reduction
Decrease in elopement rate
1 to 2 additional treat and release patients
per day$550,000
Projected opportunity represents decreasing the elopement rate from 3.8% to 2.0%, which equates to an increase in ED charges based on the average charge per visit of $914.
Indirect Financial BenefitImprove Observation I/P Conversion Process
Converting patients from Observation status to I/P when appropriate will improve revenue opportunity.
These financial benefits will be realized as a result of the Care Management initiatives of the Patient Throughput and Capacity Optimization Implementation Plan.
Decreased Variable Costs – Improved Productivity
Increased throughput without a change in staffing levels will decrease valuable costs per unit of service and increase productivity.
Accountability systems and performance metrics implemented during the engagement teach the front-line managers how to proactively manage volume and plan for daily workload.
TBD DURING IMPLEMENTATION
PHASE
Length of Stay Reduction
University of North Carolina Health Care SystemSection XIII – Page 68
Key Components for Success
• Recognize that patient throughput is a hospital-wide issue, not just an issue for particular departments, such as the Emergency Department and Surgical Service.
• Develop and communicate an overall hospital patient throughput philosophy.
• Communicate a message to all patient care givers that everyone is accountable for patient throughput.
• Establish and communicate clear, measurable indicators and outcomes.
• Measure the process on a continuous basis.
• Design and manage patient throughput as a single seamless beginning to end process.