secondary-research group 14

Upload: suyash-jain

Post on 07-Jul-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/19/2019 Secondary-Research GROUP 14

    1/4

    Group No. : 14 RP-1 Date: 18th January 2016

    SECONDARY RESEARCH

    REPORT

    ON

    The Pervasiveness of Stories

    and

    Narratives in Organization Life

      Submitted !"

      #RO$P NO % &'

      Su!ash (ain)C*&+,

      Yash -anga.)C*/0,

      Shubham

    Neema)C*/+,

  • 8/19/2019 Secondary-Research GROUP 14

    2/4

    Group No. : 14 RP-1 Date: 18th January 2016

    The self is a fundamental concept in psychological theory, holding a central position in

     psychoanalytic (Kohut, 1977) and humanistic (Rogers, 1959) theories. Sinha(!!9) argues

    that the centrality of "or# in people$s life may differ, %ased on the different functions that

    &"or#$ may ser'e for them, ho"e'er, the influence of $"or#$ on $self(and 'ice 'ersa) can hardly

     %e o'eremphasied. She says $meaning of "or#$ lead to discussions around $identity$ and

    separating the t"o can cause serious gaps in understanding. The selfconcept has traditionally

     %een structured as a su%stance or thing that is, its meaning has %een deri'ed from a

    categorical structure (*andler, 19+).-rites (19+) supported the notion that the selfconceptre/uires a narrati'e structure. 0e "rote 2The self is a #ind of aesthetic construct, recollected

    in and "ith the life of e3perience in narrati'e fashion2. -rites held that the selfconcept

    consists of a narrati'ely structured recollected self, and he understood that the more complete

    the story, the more integrated the self. Self#no"ledge is an appropriation of the past. 4hen

    this appropriation is not recollecti'e, integrati'e, and selfdisco'ering, then the person

    e3periences un happiness or a form of despair.n recent years, reformers of %oth pri'ate and

     pu%lic institutions ha'e preached that fle3i%le, glo%al corporations pro'ide a model of

    freedom for indi'iduals, unli#e the e3perience of fi3ed %ureaucracies *a3 4e%er once called

    an 6iron cage. Sennett argues that, in %anishing old ills, the ne"economy model has created

    ne" social and emotional traumas. 8nly a certain #ind of human %eing can prosper in

    unsta%le, fragmentary institutions the culture of the ne" capitalism demands an ideal self

    oriented to the short term, focused on potential a%ility rather than accomplishment, "illing to

    discount or a%andon past e3perience. ut narrati'es present a different case .:arrati'e is first

    and foremost a prodigious 'ariety of genres, themsel'es distri%uted amongst different

    su%stances ; as though any material "ere fit to recei'e man$s stories.

  • 8/19/2019 Secondary-Research GROUP 14

    3/4

    Group No. : 14 RP-1 Date: 18th January 2016

    ne"s item, con'ersation. *oreo'er, under this almost infinite di'ersity of forms, narrati'e is

     present in e'ery age, in e'ery place, in e'ery society= it %egins "ith the 'ery history of

    man#ind and there no"here is nor has %een a people "ithout narrati'e (arthes,

    1977).:arrati'e refers to any "ay of representing a series of e'ents as a se/uence that mo'es

    from a point of %eginning to a finishing point. These e'ents can %e real or imagined, and they

    can pertain to anything that the author has in mind (-or'ellec, !1). There is a common

    narrati'e pattern that underlies and configures people$s temporally structured selfconcept.

    There are, ho"e'er, differences in the plot lines used %y indi'iduals to organie their life

    e'ents into a temporal unity. >lot lines used in the construction of selfnarrati'es are not

    usually created from scratch. *ost often they are adaptations of plots from the literary and

    oral stories produced %y one$s culture (0orne, 1991). The gro"ing returns of narrati'eanthropology, en/uiry, and politics ha'e prompted a 'i'id interest among organiational

     practitioners, scholars and students for narrati'es from, in, a%out, around, and for

    organiations. The gro"ing returns of narrati'e anthropology, en/uiry, and politics ha'e

     prompted a 'i'id interest among organiational practitioners, scholars and students for

    narrati'es from, in, a%out, around, and for organiations (-or'ellec, !1).8ur e3perience and

    memories include a 'ast aggregation of narrati'ely structured episodes and stories. :arrati'e

    structure is used to ma#e meaningful the actions of friends and ac/uaintances, pu%lic

    indi'iduals and groups, and go'ernments and institutions. t is also used to interpret and gi'e

    coherence to past episodes in our o"n li'es and to configure future acti'ities that "e e3pect to

    lead to desired outcomes. n addition, narrati'e is used to gi'e form and meaning to our li'es

    as a "hole (0orne, 1991).

    0orne (1991) argues that e3periences result from interaction of cogniti'e organiing process

    "ith cues from e3ternal perpetual senses, internal %odily sensation and cogniti'e memories.

    -onsciousness gi'e meaning to this cues %y identifying as a part of structure. :arrati'e is one

    of the cogniti'e process that gi'es meaning to temporal e'ents %y identifying them as parts of

    a plot. The narrati'e structure is used to organie e'ents into 'arious #inds of stories= for

    e3ample, the stories or histories of nations, %iographical or auto%iographical stories of

  • 8/19/2019 Secondary-Research GROUP 14

    4/4

    Group No. : 14 RP-1 Date: 18th January 2016

    indi'iduals, and imaginati'e or fictional stories in the form of no'els and fairy tales. n

    addition to these pu%lic stories, indi'iduals construct pri'ate and personal stories lin#ing

    di'erse e'ents of their li'es into unified and understanda%le "holes. These are stories a%out

    the self. They are the %asis of personal identity and selfunderstanding and they pro'ide

    ans"ers to the /uestion 24ho am ?2 These narrati'e representations or concepts of our sel'es

    share "ith other #inds of stories the narrati'e structure= they differ, ho"e'er, in the unfinished

    nature of their plots and in the personal nature of the e'ents a'aila%le for inclusion in the

    story. Stories are narrati'es that operate as a schematic structuring of temporal e'ents.

    *andler (19+) "rote that 2stories ha'e an underlying, or %ase, structure that remains

    relati'ely in'ariant in spite of gross differences in content from story to story2 (p. ). The

    structure consists of a num%er of ordered constituents. The story se/uence %egins "ith asetting in "hich the narrator introduces the characters, the location, and the time in "hich the

    story ta#es place.@nderstanding one$s self as a su%stance, consisting of a list of properties,

    fails to e3press the unfolding and storied nature of human e3istence. Aie"ing one$s self as a

    narrati'e, in "hich Bife e'ents are configured and made meaningful %y personal plots or story

    lines, emphasies the constructi'e and interpretati'e nature of the self. 4hen the self is

    'ie"ed in terms of narrati'e, the e3perience of angst and despair is understood to %e

    symptomatic of the fact that one$s personal plot can no longer hold together one$s life e'ents

    nor produce a unified and integrated e3perience of self.