second and final post implementation review of the ... august 31, 2011 mr. cliff guffey president...
TRANSCRIPT
LABOR
August 31, 2011
Mr. Cliff GuffeyPresidentAmerican Postal Workers
Union (APWU), AFL-CIO1300 L Street, NWWashington, DC 20005-4128
Dear Cliff,
Certified Mail Tracking Number:7009 2820 0000 8954 9391
As information, enclosed is a copy of the second and final Post Implementation Review for theManasota, FL Processing & Distribution Center (P&DC) area mail processing study.
If you have any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at 202-268-7412.
Sincerely,
/!i~Patrick M. DevineAlManagerContract Administration (APWU)
Enclosure
(CA2011-739)
Mar-31-2011
08·16·201113:05
Type of DtstI1bution Consolidated: Originating
FacfIty Name & Type: Manasota P&OC
Street Address: 850 Tallevast RoadCity: sarasota
State: FL50 Facility ZIP Code: 34260
District: SUncoastArea: SouttMtesl
Finance Number. _
CtuTent 30 ZfP Code(s): 342Miles to Gaining Facility: 51
EXFC office: Yes
Plant Manager: Donald Shandor
Senior Plant Manager: James G_ Drummer (A)
District Manager: David M. Patterson
Facmty Name & Type: Tampa P&DCStreet Address: 3501 Bessie Cofeman Blvd
City: Tampa
state: FL50 FacUity ZIP COde: 33630
District Suncoast
Area: SouthwestFinance Number: _
CtuTent 30 ZfP Code(s): 335, 336, 346eXFC office: Yes
Plant Manager:senior Plant Manager: James G. Drummer (A)
District Manager: David M. Patterson
Approvat Date: March 24,2009JmptementatIon Date: Apr-Q1-2010
PIR Type: Ftnal P1RDate Range of Data: Apr-Q1-2010:
Processing Days per Year: 310
BargaIning UnIt Hours perYeer: 1,750EAS Hours per Year: 1,825
Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of8oITowlngI November 28,2008
New FacIIIly Stan-up Costs Update 1-------------1Date & TIme this workbook was last saved:
Area VJce President: Linda J. Welch
V1ce PresIdent, Network OperationS: David E. Witliams
Area AMP Coordinator: Steve JacksonHAl Contact: Barbara Brewington
PIR Data Entry PagePage 1 of 38
Approval Signatures
Pm Type: Final PIR
to Mc1r-31-2011
P&OC
Gllfmng I'w:IIIty ......Type:F1ldIlfr lIP Codlt:~~
¢tlrmJtSCF m-Code(IJ):
ImptemeRtlldon Date: 04r01/10--------Date. -..of Data: Apr-Q1-2010
u.Ing F...., Name and Type:~ZlPee.:
Fius'tc. NIlmIler.CunQt8CF 1JPc-.~
Typeof~Co..oRdl'ld:
~OF~AeIJTY-I ICNlo'I. thetl 1M ICOllUIliIIttlletor~n~ hlfleegri(y~aI~pcllltlIl~~.~~~ancl__~.OOIIlflllIIlC:edlQOl~~It f'Y",,*,1!IIIlcm~""~and~dfurlds. ........ .,...........40f1ll(~
J
LOSM FACII.lfY:
PIant ......r:Donald .$tlandor SAO!J.L
Stmfor"...~ / I__...:::Jatnes:::::':':';::;::;';:~:;:"t,_.::,;Orum~...,.:..::.mer:':':::..J!uA}:--_-:=:::::~~~~~s::::::::=-=~_l¢/~ ~
OIAict .....eY:
OsvIdMtP~
Date
t;!t11J;
~.Lu!. '. ilJ...
~iiiMii
DilJtrict .......:
David M. PaIelSQn
i'iAIlfWSFN:!JLlTYj
P1ant~
left Blank lnten~
»116Ii&iAIq VIM PI ••ld.fIt:
Und4J.W~
VIce P".sht_ Network 0,.......:
DavId E. WilIams
<:1 1.11.'
-------------------------------_....__..-
Page 2 0#38
Executive Summary PIR Type: Final PIRlast Sawd: August 16, 2011 Date Range of Data: Apr..Q1·2010 • Mar·31·2011
Losing Facility Name and Type:Street AddrllS$:
City:
State:Current SCF ZIP Code(s):
Type of Distribution Consolidated:
Gaining Facility Name and Type:Street Address:
City:
State:Current SCF ZIP Code($):
Savings/Costs
Function 1 Workhour Savings
Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings(less MaintlTrans)
PCESIEAS Workhour Savings
Transportation Savings
Maintenance Savings
Space Savings
Total Annual Savings
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year Savings
StaffingCraft Position Loss
PCESIEAS Position Loss
lilliS [ PService
First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC O/N)
First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day)
First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day)
Customer Experience MeasurementOverall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level
Customer Experience MeasurementOverall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level
Page 30f38
Manasota P&DC850 Tallevast RoadSarasotaFL342
Final PIR V$ Pre AMP Final PIR vs Approved
$22,020,308 $19,459,225 from Workhour Costs· Combined
($480,747) ($480,747) from Other Curr vs Prop
$1,861,215 $1,410,821 from Other Curr vs Prop
$2,536,760 $2,518,646from Transportation HCRand Transportation pvs
$1,256,060 $1,100,170 from Maintenance
$0 $0 from Space Evaluation and Other Costs
$27,193,595 $24,008,115
$0 $0 from Space Evaluation and Other Costs
$27,193,595 $24,008,115
318 291 from Staffing-Cran
26 19 from Staffing-PCESIEAS
I I I III I.Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr
97.57% 97.29% from Service Performance & CSM
96.28% 95.06% from service Performance & CSM
94.12% 93.88% from SeNice Performance & CSM
88.3% from service Performance & CSM
83.5% from SeNice Performance & CSM
PIR Executive Summary
!illCalculation References
PI Iii 1J
Combined Losing and Gaining Faclffty Data:
Function 1 Workhour Cos1s
Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs(lMs Maintenance & Transportation)
PCESIEAS Workhour Costs
Transportation Costs
Maintenance Costs
Space Savings
Total Annual Cost
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year
Craft Position Total On-Rolls
PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls
PreAMP
$88,009,213
$2,685,204$11,341,339
$9,000,162$26,095,701
$0$137,131,620
$0
$137,131,620
1,605
125
Proposed
$85,448,130
$2,685,204$10,890,945$8,982,048
$25,939,811$0
$133,946,139
$0
$133,946,139
1,578
118
Final PIR
$65,988,906
$3,165,951$9,480,124$6,463,402
$24,839,642$0
$109,938,024
$0
$109,938,024
1,287
99
Function 1 Workhour Savings
Non-Processing Craft WorI<hour Savings(Ie.. MainVfrans)
PCES/EAS Workhour Savings
Transportation Savings
Maintenance Savings
Space Savings
Total Annual Savings
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year Savings
StaffingCraft Position Loss
PCES/EAS Position Loss
Page 4 of 38
Final PIR vs Pre-AMP
$22,020,308($480,747)
$1,861,215$2,536,760$1,256,060
$0$27,193,595
$0
$27,193,595
318
26
Final PIR vs Proposed(Approved) AMP
$19,459,225($480,747)
$1,410,821$2,518,646$1,100,170
$0$24,008,115
$0
$24,008,115
291
19
Approved AMP
$2,561,083($0)
$450,394$18,114
$155,890$0
$3,185,481
$0
$3,185,481
27
7
PIR Executive Summary
Losing Facility Name and Type:CurrentSCF ZIP Codets):
Type .of Distribution Consolidated:
Summary NarrativeLast Saved: August 16, 2011
Manasota P&DC342
Originating
Gaining Facility Name and Type: Tampa P&DCCurrent SCF ZIP Codets): 335, 336, 346
was from the period from April 1, 2010 - March 31, 2011. This AMPPIR shows an approximate annualized savings of $27,193,595. The average daily originatingvolume for the Manasota P&DC was 382,519 pieces at the time of the study. The actual savingsis s· oposed savings in the approved AMP study. The reasons for thisare volume reduction from the before period at both ManasotaTampa and other initiatives that occurred concurrently with the AMP. These initiativesdescribed later in this report.
Total Annual Savings
Total First Year SaVings
ApprovedAMP
$3,185,481
$3,185,481
Final PIR \IS.PreAMP$24,008,115
$24,008,115
Final PIR vs.Approved
$27,193,595
$27,193,595
Page 5 of 38
PIR Summary Narrative
RETAIL AND BUSINESS MAIL ENTRY UNIT (BMEU) IMPACTSThere have been no changes to retail or BMEU operations as a result of the AMPimplementation. There have also been no changes to local mail collection box pick-up times dueto AMP. Mailers presently are able to deposit their mail through the Manasota P&DC BMEU asdone before the AMP was Implemented. A local Manasota postmark is still available from acollection box at the Manasota P&DC.
CONCURRENT INITIATIVES FOR FY 2010During FY 10 there were other concurrent initiatives implemented that added to the reduction ofstaffing that were attributed to the total savings listed in this PIR. These savings were not as aresult of the AMP. At the time of the study, both Tampa and Manasota P&DC's were excessingclerks from their facilities due to volume reduction. Other attrition including retirements was alsohigher then normal during this time frame.
In FY10 the Suncoast District completed another AMP project for Lakeland originating mail toTampa and closed an MTE annex. The MTE closing not only saved the lease costs buteliminated numerous PVS round trips between Tampa P&DC and that annex. This accounts forpart of the PVS savings. As a result of the Manasota AMP, Tampa gained staffing (15 mailhandlers and 9 to the Maintenance craft), and eqUipment (2 NEC cancellers). The first day of thetransfer of volume from Manasota to Tampa was March 29, 2010. The first of the Impactedemployees from Manasota reported to Tampa on March 26, with the final ones reporting onMarch 29. It should be noted that given the current PIR financial model format andimplementation timeframe, there will be some savings that are attributed to both PIR's.
EMPLOYEE IMPACTSThe movement of the originating mail processing operations had an Impact on staffing andrequired the movement of personnel as listed in the study. The AMP study projected a net impactof 27 craft and 7 management positions. The PIR shows a reduction of 318 craft positionsbetween the two facilities. Total Function 1 work hour savings was projected to be $2,561,083.The Final PIR indicates a total Function 1 saVings of $22,020,308 and EAS savings of$1,861,215.
MDOs+SDOs to Craft ,
(1 :22 target)
1 : 171: 18
Craft = FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuais
'Craft = F1 + F4 at Losing F1 only at Gaining
Page 6 of 38
MDOs+SDOs to Craft ,
(1 :22 target)
1: 171 : 20
PIR Summary Narrative
TRANSPORTATIONTransportation supporting the Manasota P&DC is exclusively HCR. Because of the distance toTampa, all collection mail comes to the Manasota P&DC for cross docking for trips to Tampa.Annual net transportation savings were estimated at $18,114 in the approved study.
The transportation plan that was in the approved AMP package is as follows: savings were to beachieved by reducing 2 inline stops on the 328AJ, one inline stop on 339KE and one on 339M7.An inline stop in Tampa was added for HCR 342CE. The following routesltrips will transport thecollection mail from Manasota to Tampa. Route 33551 will transport collection to Tampa at 1600and 1830 (1830 is modified from outbound 0230). The DOV for collection will be on 34265 leaVing1915 with the Express volume as presently done. Current non-collection mail (STD) on these tripswill be moved to later 33551 trips leave at 0001, 0030 and 0145 to leave enough space for theconsolidated collections. Tampa will transport overnight collection mail back to Manasota on route34265 leaving at 2100, 33551 leaving at 2215, 2245, and 0001. The Tampa to Manasota trips areall existing trips with no modifications to them.
This plan was slightly changed after the study was approved to achieve service and improve the2000 cancellation percentage for the AMP. The following HCR routes 328AJ, 339 KE and M7,and 342 CE were changed as listed in the work study. Additional inline stops were taken out ofHCR routes 33110 and 33512 to save costs. The HCR 33551 that was implemented waschanged from the approved study. The following routes/trips will transport the collection mail fromManasota to Tampa. Route 33551 will transport collection to Tampa at 1630, 2030, and 1800.The DOV for collection will be on 34265 leaving 1915 with the Express volume. All non-collectionmail (STD) will be moved to later 33551 trips leave at 0001 and 0115. Tampa will transportovernight collection mail back to Manasota on route 34265 leaving at 2100, 33551 leaving at2215 and 2330. The HCR savings listed in the Final PIR is $1,175,480. Of which $915,821 wasfrom the elimination of routes 339M7 and 342CE. Both of the routes were eliminated not due tothis AMP.
The Tampa P&DC has made numerous changes to PVS transportation during FY 2009, FY 2010and to date in FY 2011. PVS was not impacted by this AMP. The PlR shows a total PVS savingsof $1,361,280 which are irrelevant to the AMP implementation, as there is no PVS transportationbetween Tampa and any Manasota office. Each of the PVS changes and the savings areattr butable to streamlining operations and not a part of AMP savings.
EQUIPMENT RELOCATION and MAINTENANCE IMPACTSThe AMP study projected an annual Maintenance savings of $155,890. The Final PlR shows afirst year annual savings of $1,256,060. The primary reason for this is that Tampa had more than20 Maintenance employees less than authorized staffing levels plus other initiatives that were notrelated to AMP. The AFCS's were 969'ed and disposed of at Manasota. The VFS systems arecurrently still in the facility awaiting disposition.
SPACE IMPACTS/DAR/EXPANSION OR RENOVATIONThere are no expansion or renovation projects, or other expenses associated with this AMPstUdy. The Manasota P&DC facility (280,978 sq feet) and the land it occupies are currentlyowned by the USPS. This facility does not have any leases associated with it. The acquiredspace from the AMP is currently being cleared for long term function 4 consolidations.
IMPLEMENTATION PLANIn the study it was stated that if the stUdy was approved, implementation of the mail movementwould be accomplished in phases. After approval this was actually done in a single movement ofthe mail on March 29, 2010, achieving the required timeframe for implementation.
SUMMARYThis Area Mail Processing consolidating Manasota's originating mail into the Tampa P&DC,including the additional initiatives and other non AMP related changes; have resulted inannualized savings of $27,193,595. The total savings for this Final 1-Year PIR includes 1 year ofLakeland's originating volumes due to that AMP project. Both of these PIR's are sharing the sameexact savings from Tampa's craft, Maintenance and PVS reductions. This is inflating the actualsavings from each of these AMP studies. This is a result of the Lakeland and Manasota AMPstudies being conducted simultaneously but separately.
Page 7 of 38
PIR Summary Narrative
Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction MeasurementLast Saved: August 16, 2011
PIR Type:Implementation Date:
Losing Facility: Manasota P&DCDistrict: Suncoast
Final PIR04/01/10
Fiscal Quarter
012009
022009
032009
042009
Fiscal Quarter
OvernightPercenta e
95.28%96.13%94.78%96.59%
B,IliC f)lm '.h ,,~"',," ~ -;~ ~
Gaining Facility: .-:T,.::a::..;m.:r:p:.::a...:.P.,;:&:.:D:..;C=--- _District: Suncoast
Fiscal Quarter
012009
022009
032009
042009
Fiscal Quarter
032010
042010
012011
022011
OvernightPercent e
95.86%96.64%95.91%96.08%
. ' BXliCf)lm ,';.0"'~"", G ~ 0,",,""M~~
OvernightPercenta e
97.97%97.29%96.76%97.45%
(15) Notes: _
• Customer satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer ExperIence Measurement(CEM) In 2010. Data reflects most recently completed quarter available In CEM.
01 Overall Satisfaction (Overall ExperIence)
04a Satisfaction with ReceiVing (Expenence with receMng)
08a Satisfaction with sanding (Experience with sendlng)
012a Satisfaction with most frequently visited PO (ExperIence with most frequently visited PO)
016a satisfaction with most recent contact with USPS (&penence with most recent contact with USPS)
019 Likely to recommend the USPS
Question #
Q1Q4a
Q8sQ12aQ16aQ19
Residential TopTwo Box
88.3%91.0%88.4%85.7%571%84.6%
SmJMed Bus Top Two Bo83.5%89.1%88.2%81.5%56.8%82.9%
Page 8 of 38 PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement
PIR T\'I>O': ;,,;:<ii:'i::;""...""0r.::&Li'ii==.-=_="C1iii=.."'....."""-....I CombIned Facilities I
T\'I>Oof~C_ 9!l!M!!!!l!!
Woridlour Costs • Combined Facilities"'_'-'-lG.2D\,
o.le RanQO of Ooola: "POl :I9tI to ...~.t1
PIR ¥\I'<ritlcu C<JIClI.~~
PIR Type" -::~",i:'7'a",I:c.,pt';;~'""c"C"","",~---'-"'-"""-aI!z""-<d7'''''''''''F""..."",,ptR
(1)
Gaining Facility -,T!!.a'!;mpa=,-P~&~DC~ _
Type of D1.tl1butlon Conoolldaled OriglnelJng
Workhour Costs - Gaining FacilityLut SaYed August 16, 2011
Dete Range of Data Apr 01 2010 10 MAl 312011
Final P$R
$278.337$85,515
$692.286$76<
$789.820$1.7n.OOO
$10.111$0$0$0$0
$H87.138$2.6<1.520
$294.298$0
$259.<11$137
$11~.961
$0$1,639
$0$0
$380.065$2,371,27~
$0$0
$8~
~92,267
$0$0
$96.762$1.~52.826
$H01.703$1.362.1~
$617,266$1.718.081
$599.067$147.812$8~,805
$119,803$885.~
~8.381
~,~50
$0$79,673
$160.862$88
$0$0
$767.865$0$0
$161.683$0$0
$873.092$1<5
$398218$0
$8.679$61.291
$1.262.7~9
~~1
$143.150
P R \Nonmour Costs - Galning
Fm.t P1R
$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
$1,589,&«;$310,167$173,465
$1,0«.309$507.502$221.895
$0$0$0$0$0
$50.048$898.788
$0$1.233,514
$0$305,989$612,122
$0$75,303
$324.112$37.143
$237279$1,386
$0$357.707
$79,876$26,772
$896.642$1,904
$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
$1,912,131$731,230$173.038$110,407$173.839
$58221$0
$2,823.051$6,090,706
$14,637$0$0$0
$1.914.294$1.475
$0$0
$7,804$45,090
$106$288,295
$0$0
$171.091$35.688
$0$0
$28.605$158
$893,970$1,174.182
$1.645$35,939
P R WorkhOU( Costs - Gaining
...... P1R
$3,247$25.419
$543$0
$4n.093$7
$00"
$83$47.239
$0$61.356$10.632$47.656
$4.049$178.50<4
$9.018$9.227
$13.851$661.644
$0$0$0$0
$10.970$0$0$0
$30.<411$0
$535.157$22.540$92.538
$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
P R VVorKhour Costs· Gaining
I Otttervvorkllour MoveAnalysls ILosing Faclllty: Manasota P&OC Galnlng FacUlty: Tamp!! P&OC Dale Range oIData: Q.4/01/10 to lW31/11
Final PI" Other l.osingCraft VVorkhours I I - - - -
PlR Otlw WO<1<holS Costs
Totals lM,383 17~,5tl 17~,627 $7,823,~93 $7,380,480 $7,827,172
Page 21 of 38
Totals 492,676 500,032 463,640 $20,712,824 $21,045,730 $20,266,702
PIR Other Wo<1<hour Costs
10'10 $3039 $2 553 $0 $401413 $40141310 $579547 $486820 $267,343 $4172164 $4172164 $339634410 32008 $446867 $407577 $57914 $57914 9368901 $94 434 $0 $16721 $148 846 $148 848 $13382810 $249853 $166652 $125032 $446633 $448633 $27460935 651 $493 785 $577376 $1553221 $1553221 $201866310 $1436 $1436 $0 $0 $0 $070 $6438 $6438 $0 $0 $0 $080 $122033 122033 $285524 $210487 $210487 $23284750 78 78 $0 $0 $0 $030 $89822 $69822 $33106 $125788 $125788 $7863535 $94 813 $94 813 $100,801 $188506 $188,506 $57,67435 $ $1060 $1060 $0
7483 $47463 $0$303687 $303867 $399813$168900 $186900 $92337
$60758 _~758 ---.J£$0
$68$421
PIR 01he< V\\)r!<holK Cosls
Total. 54,711 ~5,OO6 31,963 $2,569,795 $2,l19,~Ol $1,&47,~15
Page 23 of 38
Total. 187,655 167,855 1~4,696 $6,771,~ $6,771,54~ $7,632,70'<
PlR Oth<lr Worl:hou< Co.l'
Totals 11.802 10,622 5,359 $<414,191 $J72,n2 $238,518 Totals 45,101 45,101 15,5014 $1,495,791 $1,495,791 $582,820
I Distribution to Other PIR Worksheet Tabs I
78', ':.•.•.•
Cps 617, 679,7M(31)Ope 70s, 7tl6(34)
781 "'~ .... t ... l .. l
Page 24 of 38
PIR Other Workhour Costs
$'$285,524
60708081
S4n.1$1,782
$(I$6
$0$210A87
$0
Pre AMP Com_
............. 1 "'""" """"""'" 1 """"
Proposed - Combined
".1:r;
17.9<r.:SW.~
·16.• '......-$1.077.1~
~,7.(7
4200.281-$654,421
41,861,215i
~92.303
-3
-71.35
~-27.1
~·11,2;;
-1".2\1
~
-33,891
-33.4SQ
~5,006
Fln.1 PlR to Pre-AMp· Ch.noe
~·13,813
-139,600-139
_""""" 1-"'-100....""'-'_"""""
-8.78
~
~-5.81
-$.2<11
-2.5QI.nw:-52,190,38
-2,790.38.
$480.7-47-$280.281
-$1.047,890
~-$1,.410.821
!3::-11
.70.8
~·24.1
·13.11
~
inll PlR to Proposed· Chlnoe
.l2!.!-13.81
-33.042
-30,em
-56.29'
~J9(
-1
"""""'- ,-"""'" """'" ""'- 1 -",-""""lustmentiSpecla--
$465.11
$3,165,95
$4,5<0,82
$38.395.3
$20,743
$9,480,12
837,63013,606
-471.886
176,661
66,425
109,2Si
""""""'" . """"Fln.1 PlR - Combined
$1,513,00
~$<t,821,1
$41.18$,71
$21,275,<
~46.648
964.220
~123,066
S02....232.953
$1.542.2
$2,685,20
$4,821,1
541,781.63
$21.397,74
$11,341,
47.497
9n.528
505.336
242.~
~123,066
S~sot'lCnlft JoIng OplTala
-""""P'\ffllo Mal.......... tab'
s
...Qthet Cratr~sOps QOlng to 'Tfam-PV$''Malnt~·Tabt.
Tran~Op:s (ooino toT~ tab'
00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $00 0 $0 0 0 $0
TotaiAdi 0 $0 Total Adi 0 $0
Page 25 of 38
PlR ou- WO<Id1OlX Costs
Staffing - CraftLast Saved: August 16, 2011
PlR Type: Final PfR
Craft Positions
Function 1 - ClerkFunction 4 - ClerkFunction 1 - Mail HandlerFunction 4 - Mail HandierFunction 3A - Vehicle SE!rviceFunction 3B - MaintenanceFunctions 67-69 -lmtdlRahablWC
Total
Data Extraction Date: 04110111
ffi! 11 7 11 • Hi lSI III
FtJIlCtion 1 - Mail Handler
Fwction 3B - MaintenanceFt.alCfion 3A - Vehicle SsMce
Ftll1CIiion 1 - CIErt
Data Extraction Date: 04110111 VarlancM Total On-Roffs(21) (22)
Change Final Pm vs Final Pm "'sAnalysis Pre AUf' h<>pO$(!d
Positions 201l 225
Page 26 of 38 PIR Staffing - Craft
Staffing· PCESIEASlast Saved: August 16, 2011
PIR Type: Fi'Ial PlR
32
59
(till
EA&-17
EA&-19EA&-19EA&-19EAS-18EA&-18
EA&-16EA&-15
EAS-17
EAS-12
41
3938
3635
Losing Facility: Manasota P&OCData ExlIaclIoo Oata _1
(t)
PCESIEAS Positions
3130
7J
33
52
5051
555&
58
.f6 -If-__
00
51
a.-. __.. _PIlI .........,... ,.".- "'-"<I
__ (1 (
-PCESIEAS
Gllfnlngfaclllr:.:,T-ea:::::::l:=. ..:..P&OC;:::.:::..,..,=~ __ "*-Oote ...-«
I T~~::~.:r: ;: I----- (ilDooot 101hot_so.-y)
PlR Stalling • PCESIEAS
Transportation. PVSlast Saved: August 16, 2011
$0$0
{$~$30
{$141,623}! {$141,623j($202,301
(9) I (10)Vanance Variance
Final PIR vs Final PIR vsP
o$0
(8)
PIR
$4,477,172
$112,540
$4,364,633
PIR Type: Final PIR
Date Range of Data: Apr-Q1-201Q - to - Mar-31-2Q11--------F~~:g:~~~.;...P&;;.;.;DC;;;..;;... _
$63,649
$01 $0
(4) I (5)Varlanee Vananee
Final PIR vs Final PIR vsP
$0
o
$0
$63,649
$63,649
(3)
FlnalPIR
losing Facility: M1ilnsso;.;;tl!l:;:.:P:..;&DC:;;.:;:;..;:;;.. _Finance Number: _
(11) Total Final PIR vs Pre AMP Transpoftatlon..p1JS savings: ($1,361,280){This 0Wlber added 10 the Executive Summary
(12) Total Final PIR vs Proposed Transportatlon.pVS savings: ($1,361,280)(This number added to the Executive SU11JfI18IY)
(13) Notes: _
Page 29 of 38PIR Transpot1atlon - PVS
PIR Type: Final PIRLosing Facility: Manasota P&DC
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating
Data of HCR Data File: July 2010
(1)
Route #
328AJ
339KE
339M?
342CE
ooooooooooooooooooooooo
Transportation - HeRLast Saved: August 16, 2011
CT for Outbound Dock: 2:30
(10)
#DIV/O!
#DIV/Ol
#DIV/Ol
#DIV/O!
#DIV/Ol
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O!
I #DIV/O!
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O.
#DIV/O!
Page 30 of 38PIR Transportation HCR - Losing
ooooooooooooo
Totals 1,238,510
Variances Total Annual Costs
#DIVlOI#DIV/Of
#DIV/OI#DIV/O!#DIV/Of#DIV/O!#DIVlO!#DIVlO!#DIV/oI#DI
Page 310138
Cbange Analysis
Dollars
Percent
(11)
Final PIR vs Pre AMP
PIR Transportation HeR - Losing
Transportation - HeRLast Saved: August 16,2011
21:30
2:30
#DIV/Ol
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/Ol
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DNIOI
#DNIOI
#DIV/OI
#DIVIOI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
#DIV/OI
(10)
Final PIR AnnualCost/Mile
PIR Type: Originating
PIR Transportation HeR - Gaining
CETforOGP:---CT for Outbound Dock:20:35
(7)
Final PIR AnnualCost
CET for Inbound Dock:
CET for Cancellations:
oo
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
ooo
o
ooooo
o
o
o
o
oo
ooo
Gaining Facility: ...:T-=.a...:m2:p-=.a...:.P_&_D_C _
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating
Date of HCR Data File: July 2010
(1 )
AnnualMileage
age
Route #
oooooooo
Totals o
Variances Total Annual Costs
Change Analysis
Ootlars
Percent
(13) Total FInal PIR va Pre AMP Transportatlon-HCR Savings:(from losing and gaining facilities)
($1,175,480)
#ONlOt
NOIVlOl#OlVIOI
#OIVIOIHOMO!
#OIVIOI#OIVIOI#UIVIOI
(1.c) Total Anal PIR vs Propose<! Transportatlon-HCR Savings:(from losing and gaining facilities)
($1;107',386)
(15) Total Final PIR va Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HCR): ($2,536,760)(This numbef' carried fOlWsrd to the Executive Summary)
(16) Total Anal PIR va Proposed Transportation (PVS & HCR):(This number carried fOlWard to the Executive Summary )
($2,518,646)
Page 33 of 38PIR Transportation HeR - Gaining
MPE InventoryLast Saved: August 16, 2011
PIR Type: AMl PIR Date Range of Data: Apr-01-2010 - to - Mar-31-2011
Gaining Faclltty:....;.T.;;;;am;.;.,;,o;..;p8;;..P__&....;;O;..;C'-- _
Date Extraction Date: 01/11/11
Losing Facility: ..;.Mana;.;,,;=sota;;.,;~P;...&;;.;;DC;;;...;;..... _
excessed 2 OBCS and the total OUI'llbGr listed In final PIR is the corrected breakdown of machines, Added 2 NEC's fromManasota-all AFCS's were 96ged, excessed 1 OBCS..QSS and 1 OIOSS. Tl!lffipa-8dded 1 AFCS from Lakeland AMP,
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$i0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
sa
$a
$0
$0
$0
(9)
Variance InCosts
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0 I $0
(8)FlnalPIR
RelocationCosts
Carried 10Space Evaluation and
OtherCosls
17
ClOSS
FSS
DBCS
APPS
CSBCS
AFSM-All
TABBER
SBPS
UFSM
DIOSS
UPS
DBCS-OSS
MLOCR·ISS
MPBCS-OSS
POWEREDINDUSTRIAl
VEHICI.£
LCTS/LCUS
Eauioment
FC I MICRO MARK
ROBOT GANTRY
HSTS/HSUS
o
o
9
o
oo
o
o
2
oo
o
2
o
oo
o
..13
(3)
DBCS-OSS
saps
CSBCS
APPS
DBCS
TABBER
AFSM-AlL
ClOSS
UFSM
UPS
OlOSS
FSS
MLOCR·ISS
POWEREDINDUSTRIAL
VEHICLE
MPBCS·OSS
LCTS/LCUS
EquipmentAFCS
FC I MICRO MARK
ROBOT GANTRY
HSTS I HSUS
(10)Notn:
Lakeland AMP.nr..._"l"~,(.")B•."'VV V~ VI uv
MaintenanceLast Saved: August 16, 2011
PIR Type': ..:.F..:.ina.:.=.:...'P:.-'c...R:..-. _
Apr..()1-2010 : Mar-31-2011
Losing Facility: Manasota P&OC----------------Date Range of Data:
Gaining Facility: Tampa P&OC--'------------------
Workhour ActiVity
E Mall ProcessingEquipment $
E Building Equipment $
E BUilding Services $(Cuslodla/ CI<IanIngJE Maintenance Operations $
SupportE MaintenanceTraining $
Parts and Supplies
(3) (4)Variance
Final P1R FlnalPiR toCosts PreAMP
3,535,472 (229,269) $ 207,441 II LDC36
624;082 $ 625,026 il! (5,360) $ 944
--105.6721~1,569,714 $ 1,675,388 105,672 $_...._....._- ---
~554 $ 402,195 35,640 $ 35,640 11I1 LDC 39
~
10\1:823 $ 121,036 II (767) $ 11,413
-5'~iOO3 $ 6,359,115 (94,083) $ 361,111
Workhour ActiVity
Parts and Supplies
(8) (9) (10)Variance Variance
Final PIR Final P1R to Final PIR toCosts Pre AMP Pre
7'671.2~1 (SOS,3SS) $ (831.93G)
l1.833,07S r: (3&9,470) $ (37S,799)
3,871,897 343,539 $ 343,539
n2.811 (18,305) $ (18,JOS)
235,188 e' (10,745) $ (10,745)
---' ---14,384,211 (580,339) $ (893,245)
(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summa!}')
(These numbers carried fOfWafd to the Executive Summa!}')
($1,256,060)
~. ($1,100,170)
(11) Final PIR vs Pre AMP. Maintenance SavinQS: ---....(12) Final PIR vs Proposed. Maintenanr... Savina<::
-_--:.~--:.--:_--
(13) Notes: ==========·Oata in PfR cotulllfl$ t5 annualized lor First PIR.
m [ iI1iielIIRlSIR
Page 35 of 38
PIR Maintenance
Losing Facility : Manasota P&DC
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating
Place a ..x.. next to the DMM labeling Iist(s)revised as result of the approved AMP.
Distribution ChangesLast Saved: August 16,2011
PIR Type: Final PIR
Date Range of Data: Apr-01-2010 -- to -- Mar-31-2011
Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.
Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?
(3) Yes. April 1,2010
(1) DMM LOO1 DMM L011
DMM LOO2 X DMM L201
DMM LOO3 DMM L601
DMM LOO4 DMM L602
DMM LOO5 DMM L603
DMM LOO6 DMM L604
DMM LOO? DMM L605
DMM LOO8 DMM L606
DMM LOO9 DMM L60?
DMM L010 DMM L801
(2) April 8, 2010 Postal Bulletin 22287
(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts
FAST Appointment Summary ReportNASS
Facility NameTotal No-Show Late Arrival Open Closed Unschd
Month Losing I Gaining Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count % Count % Count
Feb'11 Losing Facility 342 Manasota P&DC 296 38 12.84% 91 30.74% 0 0.00% 258 87.16% 0
Mar'11 Losing Facility 342 Manasota P&DC 348 33 9.48% 83 23.85% 0 0.00% 315 90.52% 0
Feb'11 Gaining Facility TPA Tampa P&DC 15 15 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mar'11 Gaining Facility TPA Tampa P&DC 18 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
(5) Notes: ___._===========
Page 36 of 38PIR Distribution Changes
Customer Service IssuesLast Saved: Augus116. 2011
Losing Facility: Manasota P&DC
5-OIgit ZIP Code: 34260Data Extraction Date: -=04/-::-:-14/:-:"1:-:1------
o
PIR
Mon. - Fri., Sot.
P1R
o I 0
Mon. - Fri., Sat.
P1R
o
Mon. - Fri. I Sot.
21 I 3
40 I 92
P1R
305 I 266
244 I 171
on. -Fri. I Sot.1. Collection PointsNumber picked up before 1 p m.
Number picked up between 1-5 p.m.
Number picked up after 5 p m.
Totel Number of Collection Points
2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local dellvery"? [- 0 -}
3. How many "'ocal delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP? 1- 0 J
4. Delivery Performance Report
% Carriers returning before 5 p.m.
Final P1R
QuarterlFY Percent
Qtr 3110 97.1%
Qtr4l10 970%
Qtrl111 916%
QII'2111 93.1%
5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (WIndow Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mall Acceptance Hours
Final P1R
Start I End
NlA I NlA
NlA I NlA
NlA I NlA
NlA I NlA
NlA I NlA
NlA I NlA
AnalPIR
Start I End
1000 I 1830
1000 I 1830
1000 I 1830
1000 I 1830
1000 I 1830
0:00 I 0:00
7. Can custome~ obtain a local postmark in accordance with applleabM policies in the Paml Operations Manu./? Yes
8. Notes: A local collection box is set up for customers to receive a local postmark.
Gaining Facillty:...;T,,::,a:.:.,m:r:.Pa=..:-P.:::&::.D::.C _
9. What postmark Is printed on collection mall?
Page 37 of 38
TAMPA FL 335
SAINT PETERSBURG FL
04 MAY 2007 PM 1 L
~~~~
PIR Cuslomer semee Issues
Space Evaluation and Other CostsLast Saved: Augtnl16, 2011
Losing Facility: Manasota P&DC Date:__-::0:::5:!.::/0:::3~/1c..:1 _
1, Affected FadUtyFadllty Name: Manasota P&DC
Street Address: 850 Tallevast RoadCity, State ZIP: Sarasota FL
2, One-TIme Costs
Enter anyone-time costs: _ .......,;::;:........_ $0 $0(these numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section,)
3, Savings Infonnation
Space Savings ($) _-,;,=::,-,-_ SO $0(These numbers C<lrried forward to the Executive Summary)
4, Old you uWlze the acquired space as planned? Explain,
The space is being prepPed for long term plans of function 4 consolidations,
5, Notes:
Employee Relocation Costs $0 $0
Mail Processing Equipmenl Relocation Costs(from MPE Inventory)
$0 $0
Fadlity Costs(from ebove)
$0 $0
PIR costs carried forward to Executfw Summary)Total One-Time Costs $0 $0
m
Final PIR Coatper 1,000Image.
(0) (10)
Gaining Facility:..:Tc:::a:;.:m.:tp:;::ac..:P..,:&;::D::.:C::- _
FY 2009Range of Report
Losing Facility: Manasota P&DC
FY 2008
(1) (4) (S) (6)
ProductFinal PIR Final PiR Coat per
ProductAn<X:lated REC 1,OOOlmagea
Letter. Salt Lake C' 529,90 Letter.
Flatt Salt Lake C 529,66 F'...PARSCOA SaltLakeC $158<58 PARSCOA
pARS Redlteet. Salt Lake C' $3:9,16 PARSR-ed!l'ecta-
AFPS NIA NIA APPS
Page 38 of 38P R Space Evaluation and Other Costs