seaway base metals ltd asst rpt - ontario...the south group are attributable to an intra-formational...
TRANSCRIPT
41P12SE05M 2.6904 GROVES 010
SEAWAY BASE METALS LIMITED
(TROUTFLY RESOURCES INC.)
ASSESSMENT REPORT
GROVES TOWNSHIP
ONTARIO
BY
NEIL NOVAK B.Se.
JUNE 15, 1984
2 fi 1984
MINING
i
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
These properties are located in Groves Township of the Porcupine Mining
Division of the District of Sudbury in the province of Ontario. They consist
of two separate groups of claims, the most northerly is comprised of six
claims while the southern group is comprised of four claijns totalling ten
in number.
Northern group consists of claims numbered:
P-683963 to P-683968 inclusive (6)
Southern group consist of claims numbered:
P-683891 to P-683894 inclusive (4)
These ten claims cover an area of approximately four hundred acres.
The property is currently in good standing with the provincial mining
recorder and is currently held by Troutfly Resources Inc. (a wholly owned
subsidiary of Seaway Base Metals Limited ,) with head office located at
1585-B Britannia Road East, Suites 11 5 12, Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 2M4.
LOCATION, ACCESS AND FACILITIES
These properties are located in west-central Groves Township at the
southeastern tip of Geoffrion Lake and the central portion of Shuller Lake
(see O.M.N.R. plan M.898.)
Access to the property is gained by float planes based at Gogama, Ontario
some 5.0 miles northwest of the property. Access may also be gained by canoe
by travelling from Gogama eastward along Minnisinakwa River to Duckbreast
Lake, then south to Groves Lake, two portages are required to get to Groves
Lake which, when reached is about a J mile east of the northern group,
requiring another portage. The float plane option is highly recommended
in this situation.
The crew involved in this survey established a small tent camp on the
north shore of Shuller Lake for the duration of the surveys. No facilities
were left after the completion of the survey.
HISTORY OF EXPLORATION
This general area was the focus of much exploration activity in the search
for gold and related base metals.
In 1933 exploration was carried out in the Pensyl Lake area by the
Tasmijopen Syndicate. They did a few short diamond drill holes, along with
surface trenching and stripping exposing a "rudely banded sugary or cherty
quartz vein." This vein, when sampled yielded 0.15 o.p.t. Au and 0.15 Ag 0-p-V-
drilled to a depth of 20 feet. About 500 feet east of this zone iron
formation was encountered which was heavily gossaned and yielded selected
samples of up to 0.5 o.p.t. Au plus silver. Another zone was encountered
100 feet north of this zone, which consisted of a l foot wide quartz vein
with grab samples of up to 0.5 o.p.t. Au.
In 1934 Flintoba Mines acquired a group of claims on Shuller Lake (south
group) which saw little exploration to save the opening of a few small test
pits on what they report as being "rusty shear zones in sediments."
In 1953 Falconbridge Nickel Mines entered the area and did a number
of short diamond drill holes and opened up several test pits in the
vicinity of Geoffrion Lake (currently the north group). They had interesting
results, but let the property drop due to the poor nickel-copper-gold
prices.
Groves Township saw little, if any exploration until the early 1980's
when a consortium of private and public companies pooled their resources
and flew an airborne geophysical survey over the entire southeast extension
of the Swayze Syncline. The "iron formation" of Pensyl Lake was picked up
in this EM portion of the survey and the magnetics indicate it to be
continuous from Pensyl Lake through to Shuller Lake.
SURVEY PERSONNEL
An EM 16 (VLF) and ground magnetic survey was carried out on these
properties in May 1984. Personnel involved in these surveys included John
Daley and William Dickinson, both of Thornloe, Ontario, under the auspices
of this author. All personnel were in the employ of Blue Falcon Mines
Limited of Mississauga, Ontario, on contract with Seaway Base Metals
Limited (Troutfly Resources Inc.)
SURVEY PROCEDURE
An east-west base line was established on both groups following the
centrally located claim line. This base line was cut out approximately fourf0~f
feet wide. Offsets were established every "*w hundred feet in the north
and south directions perpendicular to the base lines with stations every
one hundred feet each station being clearly flagged. Readings in the EM
survey were recorded at every station, being read in the northerly direction
in each instance. A magnetic reading was recorded at each station location,
with time variables, base station check-ins whenever possible. Total
number of feet surveyed in each survey was 44.300 feet.
ELECTROMAGNETIC CVLF) SURVEY
The very low frequency (VLF) electromagnetic survey is a passive
electromagnetic technique utilizing electromagnetic radio waves trans
mitted world wide for marine navigational purposes. The signal used in this
survey originated in Cutler, Maine, U.S.A., some 1240 kilometres to the east
at a azimuth of 104 0 , the station code is NAA, transmitted at a frequency of
17.8 khz, at a radiated power of 1000 kw.
The Geonics EM-16 hand held receiver used in this survey is capable of
measuring the variations in the tilt angle of the electromagnetic polar
ization ellipse resultant from the distortions from the normal caused by
irregular conductive bodies acted upon the transmitted signal. This unit
measures the in-phase component as a percentage of the horizontal normal
field (real component} as well as measuring the amplitude of the minor axis
of the polarization ellipse (quadrature response).
As the real component decreases and approaches zero percent, the
receiver is approaching a conductive target, and as the real component
becomes negative the receiver passes the conductor. The quadrature
response to the conductor is a semi-quantitative measurement of the inter
ference caused by overburden inconsistencies and other geologic related
quirks.
Measurements were taken along lines facing in the north (azimuth O 0)
in all instances. The values were recorded and plotted on the accompanying
geophysical plan. The results were then profiled at a scale of one inch
equals 501, and plot on the accompanying geophysical plan.
MAGNETIC SURVEY
Proton magnetometers accurately measure variations of the total intensity
of the earth's magnetic field over any given area. The resultant variations
and rate of variations of this field reflect changes in rock type, rock
constituents, as well as geologic structures and depth of magnetic bodies.
All measurements are quantitative in nature with the interpretation being
qualitative.
The Geometrics Model G-816 Portable Proton Magnetometer was used
during these surveys. This unit measures the total intensity of the
earth's magnetic field based upon an atomic constant (Proton Gyromagnetic
Ratio equal to (2.67513 0.00002) xlO4 radian l Gauss sec.). This measure
ment is independent of temperature, humidity and sensor orientation. The
unit is capable of providing one gamma accuracy, when the staff is used on the
sensor, but when the back pack mount is used accuracy is only 10 gammas
which is sufficient for surveys at the reconnaissance level.
A total of three readings were taken at each station, with the sensor
held at shoulder level. The readings were averaged, then entered into the
field book, with the time recorded at each station location.
A magnetic base station was established at line O base line station
on both the north and south properties. This station was checked into at
approximately one hour intervals during the course of the surveys.
Diurnal variations were therefore monitored within the survey periods
and corrections were made accordingly. This method, although not as
accurate as is possible, provides an acceptable observance of any micro-
pulsations during the survey period. All data was processed manually taking
into consideration all recorded drift measurements with respect to time and
reduced to a final quantitative measurement, which was plotted on the accomp
anying geophysical plans.
SURVEY RESULTS
Numerous short electromagnetic conductors were encountered during the
course of these two surveys. Nearly all conductors have a general
azimuthal direction of 090 0 20 0 . The magnetic pattern appears to follow
the overall trend of the conductive bodies with only a few minor exceptions,
where the magnetic pattern transects the electromagnetic pattern. This
occurs in the extreme southeast corner of the north group, and in the south-
west corner of the south group.
INTERPRETATION
"NORTH GROUP"
Several short electromagnetic conductors exist in this group of claims.
High magnetics are commonly associated with these short conductive zones. A
large east-west trending conductor exists, extending from the southern
extremity of Watershed Lake to the southeast corner near Shuller Creek.
About 1000' north two short conductors parallel this major conductor, which
show a very distinct magnetic high expression. Sulphides have been
located in this zone and were previously tested by diamond drilling in the
late 1950's with encouraging results with respect to Copper, Nickel and
Gold. The rocks in this area have been described as hybrid meta-tuffs of
intermediate affinities. The broken up appearance of the conductive zones
is thought to reflect isolated conductive bodies, syngenetic with the
volcanic accumulations, displaying an en-echelon concordant pattern. The
isolated magnetic highs reflect volcanics of more mafic compenents with
or without magnetic minerals.
"SOUTH GROUP"
An east-west electromagnetic pattern is also evident in this group.
Two parallel conductive bodies exist about 5000 apart in the northern half
of the group of claims. These two zones have little magnetic expression
and are thought to be reflecting a zone of felsic accumulations. Geologic
mapping and sampling of an area on strike to the west about three quarters
of a mile indicate that this zone is of volcanic-sedimentary origin with
economic to sub-economic accumulations of gold in a cherty iron formation
interbedded with felsic tuffs. It is therefore felt that this situation
exists within this claim group.
CONCLUSIONS
These EM and Mag surveys have suggested several areas of exciting
geologic and possibly economic situations. The area is typical of the
region in that several short en-echelon sulphide accumulations exist which
are syngenetic with the volcanic stratigraphy. The longer conductors in
the south group are attributable to an intra-formational cherty iron
formation within felsic tuffs, while the longer conductors in the south
group are attributable to sulphide accumulations within a mafic suite
of volcanics. Both series of conductors (north and south) contain economic
concentrations of metals. The northern series contains base metals Cu, Ni
as well as gold and platinum. The southern series contains primarily gold
with minor amounts of silver.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Detail geologic mapping and sampling is highly recommended to cover
both claim blocks. Several conductive bodies have been located and their
economic importance assessed by surface trenching and sampling. Diamond
drilling is recommended in both groups, to follow up the geologic mapping
and sampling whenever favourable results are obtained.
f his report is respectfully submitted by:
Neil Novak B.Se,
Geologist
June 15, 1984
CERTIFICATE
I, NEIL D. NOVAK, do hereby certify:
1) that I am an exploration geologist residing
at lot 7, Trillium Crt., Heidelberg, Ontario;^
2) that I am a graduate of the University of
Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, and hold a Bach
elor of Science degree as an Earth Scientist,
dated 1977;
3) that I have been engaged in the practice of
this profession since graduating;
4) that I have no interest, direct or indirect
in the properties or securities of SEAWAY BASE
METALS LIMITED.
NEIL D. NOVAK, B. Se.
Geologist
June 15, 1984
LJO O
UJo oCD
UJ O O c\J
MAGNETIC INTENSITY (fl) 1000 8 CONTOUR
ZOO # CONTOUR '
MAGNETIC DEPRESSION BASE STATION l
NOTE : All reading* artby "0" except where Indicated
IUJ O O tO
J cvJ
SEAWAY BASE METALS LTD. MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
GROVES TWP. ONTARIOSOUTH GROU
APPROVED
1000
) "
"**
-l-,
i
* 'r f
,i./i-\ f .x
* * ~i~
**sv^ V' 9 -' '
f \
\ N\
\ ,'\ ,\\ '
V
\i),
' \ -H -i . t.. .d. . * f
V1 \ ••i '
' ^ \ •.-i V
1 1• C J ' IK
-••: X,!^^^** .^tV
•* ^.
-1cf^4i^^i
1 ! X
v ' Nv,.N
\'t ""
N,
\ :,
J '•V 'i: \ ,
] \ .••,' !/ 4
l
V- 1 \l,\
u
\ \ X "i i ft*\ \ J-*- ' ^^i l j--\ v ^-; X .•;; f - 7•i' - a"f -*j; i (t
'J/ -Jii
^ -l;
•J '. ,,t
•n i ^
,, '.'\,,''v "' VJ*. '. ;•A ;' ^.... \ j ,,'
i i ) t... \j ,.
i\ /4V;
\ *\Ti-,, i
Uj \ *
'A; ! 'Vy \•i' \ i^"\ V-t A \^^,\ Vs'/ A. N. \
\^ v
^*. "^T* " """7
* J 4 -j/
;f -*' j , '/f;^
*- ' '
L•'Vv
i'-il '\ ^/,'M v ir
.1 .
-I-! i! i.-;* l^
j 1 ,.
J L
rx nix *^^'J ?n ". ^ !K/
- ?i ,'' Jiufo* * * ii '. V *l
" * ', l', b.-l M
fi J- * . tl 1 f ^^r, .v^'lA iM** i, 2i'!!I \?
gp— i*^*" ^ i , t.BASELtNE'^ *' -4 i 1 A., r ^\.'I \ 3iV* /"\i/.i ^
j *
;i J. '.
v i ; REAL COMPONENT (l*ft of lint)*
; QUAD. COMPONENT (right of line)•j'.' i
**' *' PROFILE (r*ol) — - — ' ——
j PROFILE (quod) r-~'--'--*
;v iv - ;'• * i•n i
J iii S ^
8 1 8 SBo * S 2: N M
SEAWAY BASE METALS LTD. AELECTROMAGNETIC (EMI6) V.L.F. SURVEY y ^
GROVES TWP. ONTARIO r
"SOUTH GR OUf" 1\i t\ i\ V t^ \ *oo* looo1H \\ Svi y \\ ir\ " ———— '
MEAL COMPONENT (Itft rf tin*)
QUAD. COMPONENT (r 1*4 rf It*.)
f1
•7
}f;7'; -J
^i-*VI
•It-w
1
\ \il "\ *\ j^l -
, t**i ""1 M
4 -*
k "
:Vx?"M \ ^* f V "•rt i ' -*
-i*i
•tt
*
4*
1
*'
1
••T "M**i '"' 'nit'
\••i "**
i•M '*y. j -U
.1* *| **
J-rt H "t
A * ^
S
u w
* Vit" ;vt
t '!*t "(J
| ,
I'll y*\
-fl 1 ^| '\ ;ji i A*! i -tt \ o^ \ -,. \ *
: r *** k*•l i ^
* ^7I ;'i*l !(,,, J.t /rt.
i J ifiJ '1 ! i-i: ^s * ; .^* .' nrrt f /"^ 1 Wf' y r
ri \ -Vu ! *
•*J
i * i j ~ * *™*j ?
f ' ^/t' i :;t i -i4 1 - 1
. i * i j -* !:l w^ T V
1 i"T "C*,, i 4J i-i r/*! y*n \ -rf \ T"
t *
l/:! r-, .l* ! l-*7 j i -*7 . i1**
i; i/ t t
' i/i
* • 'J
t v;^ r*
7 u'. l/.* A c\ J* !/^ ia. h1 1 - 7i\ s* f *-f* i }.f* i -.r* j i-/
, ,' i-:/ t;f ^V i -f
X u/\ ;
f ^ H7 1 ;' ,
J ^jjM'i 1 ' l
f , *tm i i fi
1 ' .n
9 j .' -ht 1 'w*t J ;.f* ! ;^* ' i -7r 1 ! Jl *, , -*
f '^ p1 \ .-41 j J .0
1,1
r(\:*/ /jJ ; /,*l '^
r\ \i* i i.*
i i/; / ;;•! \
PKOPILI
* ' f,* t!
UiV:* A'i (ii* \1 h1 v; |
I (***d) - --* - ---
^sjr**j,'ii1 ^r''S/
'A f 1'* .' J t -t7 J -*;W -*f! t.'t l -i:
7! ,i
i* i* \ -w* .' -wr 1 .^j. i *.y :,A -M
* ^
T *f/j
4 -w'f -tnii -')^ '*^|IHe5l) ;\ 4
iV,
1- . -3R ' * at
8 e 8
V
f .' .M
1 \ -'7; V:,-* X -/i^ y -*t C ;. .'-rfi f .n;m L 'JtJ" ^
k
V ^ i \\T;/
:ll?/v \tr\
r* M1
ir*
* ; IASELINE
-l ^ V. \
r* ^ '*.'' V
1 y **5 V f
* l/ ** 4^ \^^^nf^'t "^^**^
M^.jj'ta ,'''m*it ; w ajK, tt, 7fi
I.IUJ U W xvQ O OX
s? 8 ? o * S s*
^EAWAY BASE METALfl ^TPELECTROMAGNETIC (EMI6) V.L.F. SURVEY . c/
/)A7^ 'GROVES TWP. ONTARIO /^
"NORTH GROUP" t
—k! ^ 0^ J BOO* 1000'^Hkki-
MAGNETIC INTENSITY (l) ft#7 1000 l CONTOUR ————
200 f CONTOUR ——— MAGNETIC DEPRESSION vL BASE STATION m
Ootvi
3c 3t0 So o
uJ LJ U JfO O Oj:O O CJi
CO * O t CO ~^SEAWAY BASE METALS LTD.
NOTE- Alt rtodlnfi arc prifixtd
wh*r*
MAGNETOMETER GROVES TWP.
"NORTH
SURVEY ONTARIO
GROUP"
lOOO'
\PPROVED
Ministry o*NaturalResources
Ontario
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
The Mi41P12SE0508 2.6904 GROVES 900
Type of Survey(s)
J, M CAddress
it - 12Survey Company
Miut? CTODate oi'Survev (from Si to) ,
Day l Mo. l Yr. Day | Mo. | Yr.
Total Mites of line Cut
Name and Address of Author (of Geo Technical report)
fat. H '12.Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions
For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnet
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
c
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days perClaim
io(2.6
Days perClaim
Days perClaim
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Gale ulation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total Expenditures
S -s-Instructions
Total Days Credits may be a t choice. Enter number of d y in columns at right.
Datl
V-W U/0Y F^Certification Verifying Ref o
15
CTotal
)ays Credits
jportionedet the claim holder's i credits pel claim selected
;o\Aed HvSW \ \ TK Ale 3t (Signature)
Mining ClaimPrefix
P
- *.."C.Vi.
- *- : -'
, .....,^..u .
R [
Rece
Number
(M4 (i\foZ&Mt,#3b?3j f; *? GL O(J
{pX lyblbt3 (iMbtl 3(05kf}9(?(*&X3967kfWbZ
E C 0 R D
JUN 1 1 W^*^^ A 1
!ft*.v)\sid 2r
Expend. Days Cr.
t) t?"
^y^?
^//^^
-pe-irt,/^L.
tev4#~^^^^xi\^T^*
•4*fr
- D
LcAlLf
4
M
^For Office Use Only/
Total Day Recordec
(oCC
t Cr. Date Recorded 7
A^A^vlLJ^iqSVl Date Appro/fed as Recorded
Mining ClaimPrefix
V, . -
:i'^
t,
A.M.7i8|0
*ut
Number
^* P f i j- JL.* Y K
^ SO to*'sQ'if'i r~^iil[)^ n^
:r:i)P|K|p MINING DtVISK
: (S E l v f'UN l 1 88410,11,12,1,2
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work,
^~V s
Expend. Days Cr.
i
•••MMM B"
-&MT- -
10
MiniM^fTsatwO*' f/ St^m^^/BrarajJiffilrinjKRecorder f
rt of Work * "~ — "hereby certify that 1 have a persona
or witnessed same during and/or afterand intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
?.Q.i \ ^c,v ir (U;MW* Cu^M-A NJ.ote t
Datk Certified J
\ kjL*4 K 1 S ^iCerlifiloNby.lSiina^ jrel
itVM.c -
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Sur
Township o
Claim Holdi
Survey Con-
Author of F
Address of j
Covering Dz
Total Miles
SPECIAL
vey/s) l ^GfJfr
r Area (rjtQtffl
ar(8) S*4HMV
(T/fouTftipany "jsLUT
teport AJPIL
\nthor **4t( / l
fpsnf Survey M .. . .-.^,, ~~... ,^ , -
'/C c LecT&QfltAlJrMG'riC (p{.-f.2
r TiVA M. d 9^
B/IS^ /tt^T/itr. v A esouacfs)FAUow MfA/rs trDD A^di/AVL.-/* /5^^ 0/.-/BMM ^ C Mtiitoy
4*/ /O /AC/ - .hitjf lK/8^(linecutting to office)
nfT-ineCut 9. 1 **;(ti
PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
AIRBORNE
Magnetome
1PATF-XJU
Res. Geol.
DAYS L . , per claimGeophysical F-k^rnmagnrtir ^ 0
3 n
Radiometric- ...
-Other
fl^nlogir^l , i iil ,,
npnrhpmirfll T
\ CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
ter FilrrtrnnpagnAtir 1 A RaHmriptrir t(enter days per claiV) \\ \ \ U f
/ n \\ ** M W \W v""\lAl. OOr, SIHMATTTPP. KV\LkXMWWP
1 Author of Report or AgerirS*. -
Oualifirations ^"^ x ' c^- cr- f
Previous SurveysFile No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
P ^^V(prefix) ' (number)
P fc&Z&yi
f* 4630^,
P Wl&t
^ x a O ^7 ^" P p O f f v 2
f v fy 3 7w*
f 66 3.9+7 -.-f/ j n o fj f o
1 V O J f fev '
. (
RFCEIVEDJ^2G?^
^Wfi Uf;M ^rftv/,. .^tji/017
V i ' . .
I
1Fi
1
1a
IND
UC
ED
PO
LA
RIZ
AT
ION
R
ESI
STIV
ITY
GR
AV
ITY
Electrode
array
Electrode
spacing —
TVnp
nf
pWtrnHe
j i
t- i q i? O
C
1 2.
:
•5
5s
~ E
--
5'
r o
33
ar-
*- 3" •s
*- S c * r r k L
D C
5 :
r ^
t (?
2
5 2
Si
g" l
* o.
3
S 3
D^
tfL
i1
o*
O S 3' DW
*"*
1 ^3
g 3
3m
-Q
-0
^S
C
Cft
ff
tD
3
O
Ov-
v^ a o 5'
w rt" 1 5" p
n curacv.
Base
station g c" n
t* 3 O.
O* S 1-*- p- 3
Scale
consta
Corrections s
: g o. n
l
3 -*
EL
EC
TR
OM
AG
NE
TIC
MA
GN
ET
ICn
' TJ
f z
s? :
i j :
2 -
i s 1 t a. T V- "*, 0 r -
t IT
'S H o-
1k
—
^ -s f* i, V r i t l o*N L D f
Method:
Frpmipnrv 50 . W
D x' (T) O-
^ "
^
3.^
v
r^"
n •-i
*~ c
w•\
3" O
C5 O" n D 3
1 5" fs D i^ s? Si. ft3 5"
> o
o
t?^
2. 2.
|
1 i i
i3
25 as
S s
"S ~
t o
3 -s
. '
s Si .
^
o1
3 ? K \ r i?, tf ^ ^*? s •A 5 •iniiih
.
a~~-
r***
, T
)" r' x i- ^[t •v /x ^
CO
td
M
^-
tr1
DCD
&J
M
- X
l"
* *™
^
8 S
g g
5 g
s s?
i. S
l :.
OJ
JB
O
g
3
c*
rt
O
*^
fjj
rt-
Q-Q
-O
S
q
-
o
g
W
18
| B.
S -.
1- M
?w
fc
!j*
3
^*\
35
35
BS 3 3"
5- s
f f
S. 1
c" ^
p* 1 5 y if D O ^. r ™ ^j\ 0 ^
o2
-C
. w
P
'
X. S1 5 rt ••c t- O 0 l V |\ oq S:
^ff
'
0 i"t
V
2*
s o -x\
l? 0 ^ r •N "^ El i ^ y l* — 2
^
— D P* ^ ^ — - r 7 w 5 S—
? s' tt* , IA ^J ^ tO 01 s~-
4 -
\ ^ \^
^
~L ^ P
f
Q
V.JT
~"
^ ^ 1 W 0 ? 5* vi '
~ 0
o O Si S S *^ 5 r2,
* |
s1 1'
IT01
"
t2so
ivd
^
^
^rt
3 w
^
r*-
2.
sa
^ 5'
*"*
"1
n 0 ^ S/
"•^ ^ ^ 3' w
/i -fc ^v^
(Jo
1
z \ or*to
o
P3
M
0 ROUND
SURVE ^
en 1 (—1
o r* 3-
3
O S o
2
"TS
1 s ffi
* s
D.
"^•5
J p* TECHNICA
L y data
for
each ~ D
t
^
^
^
("
PO
o >
S o.
St
.|^
**"
•Si w -T
iK*
W < 1
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument--————————————————-—-.^——--——.™———.-—— Range.Survey Method —————-———-———-———.^———————.--.—-.—.—-^.—.—.—.-.-—
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument——
Values measured.Energy windows (levels) -——-———^———————^—-——-—.——.—.-—.—..—.—,.———Height of instrument——-————-—————.—————.-—-..-.—.-™Background Count.Size of detector——.—-—-..—-———-———-—————————..———.———--..-—...-..
Overburden —-———^—^-—.-^——-^————--——.—-———————.——.——.—.—.(type, depth - include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)
Type of survey———-——^-^————————————— Instrument ——————————————————————————— Accuracy__________________________Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of survey(s) ———
Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of lurvey)
Accuracy——————————————(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used———.——————.———.-—.————.——..—.——Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude_______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area-——————————-——.™————.—Over claims only..
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight—————— Method of Collection-^————^—
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth————— Terrain————————
Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: percent
p. p. m. p. p. b.
Da a
Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-( circle)
Others - _______,————-—--————.™^—.Field Analysis (.
Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used;——
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. —————————,
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ————
Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——
Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used————
.tests)
.tests)
.tests)
General. General.
/LL^v Ministry ot Technical Assess)I TT 1 Natural ii, i. /^ j-. VVy Resources Work CreditsOntario ^^
inent File2.6904
Date Mining Recorder's Report of1984 08 07 Work "a 235-84
Recorded Holder
TROUTFLY RESOURCES INCTownship or Area GR()VES ^^p
Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical 40
20
RariinniPtrir days
Oth*r days
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assested" column
Geological days
Geochemiral days
Man days CH Airborne O
Special provision Q Ground Q
[~1 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
tZ] Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Mining Claims Assessed
P 683891-94
683963-64-65-67-68
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
30 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC 20 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC
15 DAYS MAGNETOMETER 10 DAYS MAGNETOMETER
P 683966 P 683892-93
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey LJ Insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)
1984 07 11 Your File: 235 Our File: 2.6904
Mr. Bruce HanleyMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims P 683891 et al In the Township of Groves.
This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.
Yours sincerely,
S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: (416) 965-1380
A. Barr:sc
cc: Troutfly Resources Inc 1585 - B Britannia Rd E Suitee 11 S 12 M1ss1ssauga, Ontario L4W 2M4 Attn: Nell D. Novak
Ministry ofNaturalResources
UIO
1984 08 07 Your File: 235-84 Our F ile: 2 .6904
Bruce W. HanleyMining RecorderMinistry,of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact
Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.
Yours sincerely,
S. E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3
. Hurst:mc
Ends.
cc: Troutfly Resources Inc Suites 11 S 12 1505-B Britannia Road East Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2M4
cc: Mr. G. H. FergusonMining S Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario
645
Ministry of •Natural Resources
Ontario
Notice of Intent
for Technical Reports
1984 08 07
2.6904/235-84
An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.
If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.
If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.
If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the "dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.
B46 (82/5)
Mining Lands Section
Control Sheet
File
TYPE OF SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL
GEOLOGICAL
GEOCHEMICAL
EXPENDITURE
MINING LANDS COMMENTS:
Signature of Aspegsor
Date
1984 08 31 Your File: 235-84 Our File: 2.6904
Bruce W. HanleyMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
RE: Notice of Intent dated August 7, 1984 Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Mene tome ter) Survey on Mining Claims P 683891 et al In the Township of Groves
The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.
Please Inform the recorded holder of thesetrtlnlng claims and so Indicate on your records.
Youts sincerely,
S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888
S. Hurst:me
cc: Troutfly Resources Inc Suites 11 ft 12 1505-B Britannia Road East Mlsslssauga, Ontario L4W 2M4
cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining a* Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario
End.
cc: Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario
Ms*
X*
x*X*
.
NORTH GROUP
SOUTH GROUP
683964*
GOGAMA
tfc-PROPERTY
LOCATION PLAN
t ~ 1 6 miles683967 P-6839
LEGEND
GRID LINES
CLAIM POST
CLAIM LINE
CLAIM NUMBER
located, presumed
Q A O E.M. 16 CONDUCTOR s trong, moderate, weak E.M. 16 C ONDUCTOR A XIS MAGNETIC ANOMALY i 60000 Y
SCALEl = 500'
683892
P-^8 838 94
1500
SEAWAY BASE METALS LTD.GEOPHYSICAL COMPILATION PLAN
GROVES TWP. ONTARIO
APPROVED
41P12SE0508 a.6904 GROVES 200