searches for supersymmetry in multileptonic signatures at...
TRANSCRIPT
Searches for Searches for Supersymmetry Supersymmetry ininMultileptonic Multileptonic Signatures Signatures atat thethe
TevatronTevatron
Giulia Manca, University ofLiverpool
Workshop on Collider PhysicsArgonne National Laboratory,
8-12 May 2006
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
1 OutlineOutline
• Supersymmetry• The Tevatron and its
experiments• Searching for SUSY• Conclusions• Outlook
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
2
Higgs
γ
G~
νe νµ ντ
e µ τ
Standard Model Particles Susy Particles
Quarks Leptons Force particles Squarks Sleptons SusyForce particles
Higgsino
Graviton GravitinoG~G
Higgs
SupersymmetrySupersymmetryExtends the Standard Model (SM) by predicting a new symmetry:spin-1/2 matter particles (fermions) <=> spin-1 force carriers (bosons)
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
3
Higgs
γ
G~
νe νµ ντ
e µ τ
Standard Model Particles Susy Particles
Quarks Leptons Force particles Squarks Sleptons SusyForce particles
Higgsino
Graviton GravitinoG~G
Higgs
SupersymmetrySupersymmetryExtends the Standard Model (SM) by predicting a new symmetry:spin-1/2 matter particles (fermions) <=> spin-1 force carriers (bosons)
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
4
Higgs
γ
G~
νe νµ ντ
e µ τ
Standard Model Particles Susy Particles
Quarks Leptons Force particles Squarks Sleptons SusyForce particles
Higgsino
Graviton GravitinoG~G
Higgs
SupersymmetrySupersymmetryExtends the Standard Model (SM) by predicting a new symmetry:spin-1/2 matter particles (fermions) <=> spin-1 force carriers (bosons)
χ±i
χ0i
~
4 neutralinos
2 charginos
~
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
5
Higgs
γ
G~
νe νµ ντ
e µ τ
Standard Model Particles Susy Particles
Quarks Leptons Force particles Squarks Sleptons SusyForce particles
Higgsino
Graviton GravitinoG~G
Higgs
SupersymmetrySupersymmetryExtends the Standard Model (SM) by predicting a new symmetry:spin-1/2 matter particles (fermions) <=> spin-1 force carriers (bosons)
χ±i
χ0i
~
4 neutralinos
2 charginos
~
New Quantum Number R-Parity ⇒Lightest Sparticle (LSP) stable!
2sLBp 1)(R ++
!= +1 (SM particles)-1 (Susy particles)
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
6
Higgs
γ
G~
νe νµ ντ
e µ τ
Standard Model Particles Susy Particles
Quarks Leptons Force particles Squarks Sleptons SusyForce particles
Higgsino
Graviton GravitinoG~G
Higgs
SupersymmetrySupersymmetryExtends the Standard Model (SM) by predicting a new symmetry:spin-1/2 matter particles (fermions) <=> spin-1 force carriers (bosons)
χ±i
χ0i
~
4 neutralinos
2 charginos
~
New Quantum Number R-Parity ⇒Lightest Sparticle (LSP) stable!
2sLBp 1)(R ++
!= +1 (SM particles)-1 (Susy particles)
broken
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
7 Limitations of Standard ModelLimitations of Standard Model
• Stabilisation of Higgs mass at EW scale• Couplings don’t unify at one scale• Dark Matter• Dark Energy• Neutrino masses• Gravity
H Hf
f
Standard Model
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
8 Limitations of Standard ModelLimitations of Standard Model
• Stabilisation of Higgs mass at EW scale• Couplings don’t unify at one scale• Dark Matter• Dark Energy• Neutrino masses• Gravity
H Hf
f
Standard Model
SUSYSUSY
H Hf
f~
~
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
9 Limitations of Standard ModelLimitations of Standard Model
• Stabilisation of Higgs mass at EW scale• Couplings don’t unify at one scale• Dark Matter• Dark Energy• Neutrino masses• Gravity
H Hf
f
Standard Model
SUSYSUSY
H Hf
f~
~
SUSY
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
10 Limitations of Standard ModelLimitations of Standard Model
• Stabilisation of Higgs mass at EW scale• Couplings don’t unify at one scale• Dark Matter• Dark Energy• Neutrino masses• Gravity
H Hf
f
Standard Model
SUSYSUSY
H Hf
f~
~
SUSY
->->LSP LSP
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
11 Limitations of Standard ModelLimitations of Standard Model
• Stabilisation of Higgs mass at EW scale• Couplings don’t unify at one scale• Dark Matter• Dark Energy• Neutrino masses• Gravity
H Hf
f
Standard Model
SUSYSUSY
H Hf
f~
~
SUSY
->->LSP LSP
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
12
Wide range of signatures: look for SuSy specific signatures or
excess in SM ones; examples:
SupersymmetrySupersymmetry: how ?: how ?
Large Missing Energy ET
Isolated leptons
Multijets
…and many more!!
χ0 χ±mSugra:
!
˜ q ˜ g
Rp : LSP
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
13
Wide range of signatures: look for SuSy specific signatures or
excess in SM ones; examples:
SupersymmetrySupersymmetry: how ?: how ?
Large Missing Energy ET
Isolated leptons
Multijets
…and many more!
χ0 χ±mSugra:
!
˜ q ˜ g
Rp : LSP
10101212
1010
101044
((fbfb))
Remember : VERY SMALL cross sections !!
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
14
Wide range of signatures: look for SuSy specific signatures or
excess in SM ones; examples:
SupersymmetrySupersymmetry: how ?: how ?
Large Missing Energy ET
Isolated leptons
Multijets
…and many more!
χ0 χ±mSugra:
!
˜ q ˜ g
Rp : LSP
10101212
1010
101044
((fbfb))
Remember : VERY SMALL cross sections !!
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
15
hep-ph/9311269EWEW
scalescale
GUTGUTscalescale
HiddenHiddenSectorSector
GRAVITY
RadiativeRadiativeEWSBEWSBCorrectionsCorrections
mSugramSugra: a working model: a working model• SUSY broken through gravity• Five parameters:
M0:common scalar mass atGUT scale
M1/2:common gaugino mass atGUT scale(i.e. M1(GUT)=M2(GUT)=M3(GUT)= M1/2 )
A0: common trilinear scalarinteraction at the GUT scale(Higgs-sfermionR-sfermionL)
tanβ: ratio of Higgs vacuumexpectation values
Sign(µ), the higgsino massparameter(µ2 determined by EWSB)
• Lightest supersymmetricparticle(LSP) is the χ0
1, stable
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
16 mSugra mSugra Existing LimitsExisting Limits : LEP: LEP•• LSP ~ 50 GeV/cLSP ~ 50 GeV/c22
•• Chargino > 103 GeV/c Chargino > 103 GeV/c22 (heavy sneutrinos); (heavy sneutrinos); •• Sleptons > Sleptons > 90-100 GeV/c90-100 GeV/c22 fo forr M( M(χχ00
11)<M()<M(llRR)); ;
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
17 The The TevatronTevatron
p p at ECM 1.96 TeV• High Luminosity
Tevatron ~1.5 fb-1! Record L=1.7x1032 cm-2 s-1
• CDF and D0 running athigh efficiency
Mar01-Aug05750 pb-1
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
18 The The TevatronTevatron
p p at ECM 1.96 TeV• High Luminosity
Tevatron ~1.5 fb-1! Record L=1.7x1032 cm-2 s-1
• CDF and D0 running athigh efficiency
Mar01-Aug05750 pb-1
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
19 The The TevatronTevatron
p p at ECM 1.96 TeV• High Luminosity
Tevatron ~1.5 fb-1! Record L=1.7x1032 cm-2 s-1
• CDF and D0 running athigh efficiency
Mar01-Aug05750 pb-1
design goal
base goal
Still long way to go!
We arehere
Trileptons Trileptons at the at the TevatronTevatron
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
21
Higgsinos andgauginos mix
CHARGINOSNEUTRALINOS
pp
~
1
±!
~
0
2!
~
0
1!
~
0
1!
l
l
l
!
Low background Easy to trigger
LOW MODEL DEPENDENCE
Striking signature at Hadron Collider,THREE LEPTONS
In mSUGRA Rp conserved scenario,LARGE MISSING TRANSVERSEENERGY from the stable LSP+ν
The The trilepton trilepton signalsignal
GOLDEN SIGNAL AT THE TEVATRON !!
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
22 Chargino-Neutralino Chargino-Neutralino productionproduction……
~
0
2!
~
1
±!
W*
q
q
t-channelinterferes
destructively
q
'q
~
q
~
0
2!
~
1
±!
Low cross section (weakly produced)
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 50010-3
1
10-2
10-1
10 SUSY σ(pb) vs sparticlemass(GeV/c2) for√ s=1.96 TeV
T. Plehn, PROSPINO
χ02 χ±1
Tevatron sensitive to the BULKregion in WMAP data
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
23 ……and decayand decay
~
0
1!
~
0
2!
Z*l
l
~
0
2!
l
l~
l ~
0
1!
~
1
±!
!
l~
l ~
0
1!
~
1
±!
l
!~
! ~
0
1!
~
0
1!
~
1
±!
W*!
l
Leptons of 1st, 2nd
generation are preferredLeptons of 3rd generation
are preferred
Best reach Tevatronfor mass sleptons~mass
chargino
Char
gino
Dec
ayNeu
tralino
Dec
ay
Leading lepton
Next-To-Leading lepton
Third lepton
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
24
Missing Transverse Energy(MET)
e µ
µ
Finding SUSY at CDFFinding SUSY at CDFCENTRAL REGION
µ
Had Calorimeter
Muon system
Drift chamber
EmCalorimeter
η=0η=1
Recover loss inacceptance dueto cracks in thedetector if weaccept muonswith no hits in
the MuonChamber
Real MET Particles escaping detection (n)
Fake METMuon pT or jet ET mismeasurementAdditional interactionsCosmic ray muonsMismeasurement of the vertex
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
25 DO detectorDO detector
η=1.0η=0
η=2.0
η=3.0η=1.0
η=3.6
•Coverage to muons up to eta~2
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
26 The SM Control SamplesThe SM Control Samples
Lepton ID efficienciesTrigger efficienciesCalibrationLepton E and P ScaleLuminosity
Fake rates Jet Energy Scale
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
27 The tuning of the detector responseThe tuning of the detector response
Generatorlevel MEt
Raw Met afterreconstruction
Corrected Met
WithoutMinimum
bias
The final plot!
MC Z/γ∗−>ττ
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
28 Learning from Data: Z Learning from Data: Z ppTT
Events in the tailbackground toSUSY events!
Tune for parton KT and QCDscale in MC Generators
Trileptons Trileptons at CDFat CDF
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
30 How to investigate How to investigate thethe different scenarios? different scenarios?
Low tanβregion
High tanβregion
sensitiveto leptonic τ
decay
sensitiveto all τdecaysHigh pT Single Lepton710e±e±,e±µ±, µ±µ±
High pT Single LeptonOngoingeµ + e/µ
Low pT Dilepton312µµ + e/µ
Low pT DileptonOngoingeµ/µe + track
610
Ongoing
350
750
LUM
Low pT Dilepton
Low pT Dilepton
High pT Single Lepton
High pT Single Lepton
TRIGGER PATH
eµ + e/µ
ee + track
ee + e/µ
µl + e/µ
CHANNEL
Low tanβ scenario tanβ=5 , 38%
High tanβ scenario tanβ=20, 100%
Full acceptance
coverageHigh pT data-sample benchmark
to understand low pT data-sample
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
31 How to investigate How to investigate thethe different scenarios ? different scenarios ?
Low tanβregion
High tanβregion
sensitiveto leptonic τ
decay
sensitiveto all τdecaysHigh pT Single Lepton705e±e±,e±µ±, µ±µ±
High pT Single LeptonOngoingeµ + e/µ
Low pT Dilepton310µµ + e/µ
Low pT DileptonOngoingeµ/µe + track
610
Ongoing
350
750
LUM
Low pT Dilepton
Low pT Dilepton
High pT Single Lepton
High pT Single Lepton
TRIGGER PATH
eµ + e/µ
ee + track
ee + e/µ
µl + e/µ
CHANNEL
Low tanβ scenario tanβ=5 , 38%
High tanβ scenario tanβ=20, 100%
Full acceptance
coverageHigh pT data-sample benchmark
to understand low pT data-sample
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
32 Analysis StrategyAnalysis StrategyCOUNTING EXPERIMENTCOUNTING EXPERIMENT• Optimise selection criteria for best
signal/background value;• Apply selection criteria to the data
• Define the signal region and keep itblind
•Test agreement observed vs.expected number of events inorthogonal regions (“controlregions”)
•Look in the signal region andcount number of SUSY events !!Or set limit on the model
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
33
e
µ
µ
νµ
pp
BackgroundsBackgrounds
• HEAVY FLAVOUR PRODUCTION
Leptons mainly have low pT
Leptons are not isolated
MET due to neutrinos
• DRELL YAN PRODUCTION +additional lepton
Leptons have mainly high pT
Small MET
Low jet activity
• DIBOSON (WZ,ZZ) PRODUCTION
Leptons have high pT
Leptons are isolated and separated
MET due to neutrinos
irreducible backgrounde
e
µ
µ
γpp
The third leptonoriginates from γ
conversion
µ
µpp
π0The third lepton isa fake lepton
e
e
Backgrounds: Backgrounds: how to reduce themhow to reduce them??
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
34 Selection criteria:Selection criteria: Mass Mass
Dimuon events
Mll<76 GeV & Mll >106 GeV
Mll> 15 (20,25) GeV
min Mll < 60 GeV
(dielectron+track analysis)
Rejection of J/Ψ, Υ and Z
Dimuon Mass(GeV/c2)
SUSY
SUSY
SUSY
SUSY
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
35 ΔΦΔΦ( ( l,l ) , Jet Veto,) , Jet Veto, Missing EnergyMissing Energy
HT=∑jetETj
Jet ET > 20GeV
KinematicVariable
n. Jets <2
Trileptonanalyses
HT < 80GeV
Dielectron+ track
analysis
Kinematic Cut
Analysis
Rejection of DY and high jetmultiplicity processes
SUSY
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
36 Understanding of the DataUnderstanding of the DataEach CONTROL REGION is investigated with different jet multiplicity-check NLO processes with 2 leptons requirement - gain in statistics with 3 leptons requirement - signal like topology
Invariant Mass 15 76 106
10
1
5
??
Z + fakeDY + γ
Diboson
M
ET
SIGNALREGION
Very good agreement between SM prediction and observed data
µµ-like signL=704 pb-1
L=704 pb-1
EWK low DY Zmass
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
37 Systematic uncertaintySystematic uncertainty
Major systematic uncertainties affecting themeasured number of events
ee+lepton (high-pt)
Signal
Lepton ID 5%
Muon pT resolution 7%
Background
Fake lepton estimate method 5%
Jet Energy Scale 22%
Common to both signal and background Luminosity 6% Theoretical Cross Section 6.5-7% PDFs 7%
Z->ee MC
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
38 Results !Results !Look at the “SIGNAL” region
01.01±0.070.78±0.15 µe +e/µ
11.61±0.220.64±0.18 µµ +e/µ
00.49±0.060.17±0.05ee + e/µ
00.17±0.040.13±0.03 µµ +e/µ (low-
pT)
0.36±0.27
3.18±0.33
ExampleSUSY
Signal
10.48±0.07ee+track
96.80±1.00e±e±,e±µ±, µ±µ±
Obs-erveddata
Totalpredicted
backgroundAnalysis
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
39 HighestHighest lepton-pt eventlepton-pt event
220 GeV/c2Mass OS1
12 GeV/c2Mass OS2
In the ee like-sign analysis, we observe one interesting event
e- : 103 GeV
MET : 25 GeV
γ : 15 GeV
e- : 107 GeVe+ : 5 GeV
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
40 LimitLimitNo SUSY :(•Combined all analyses toobtain a limit on the massof the chargino in mSugra-like scenariowith no slepton mixingslepton masses ~ neutralinomasses• Observed limit:
M(χ±1) ~ 127 GeV/c2
σxBR ~ 0.25 pb
• Sensitive up to massesM(χ±
1) ~ 140 GeV/c 2 σxBR ~ 0.2 pb
Better than LEP andTevatron Run I
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
41 LimitLimit
But : we are modeldependent !
In “standard” mSugraSensitive to charginomasses of ~ 116 GeV/c2
Not able to exclude thisparticular region ofparameter space withthese results …
Trileptons Trileptons at DOat DO
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
43 Chargino Chargino and and Neutralino Neutralino in 3in 3ll+E+ETT
In mSUGRA:3 leptons+ET
Luminosity ~350 pb-1
Use tau leptons
43.85±0.75SUM
10.64±0.38µ±µ±
00.58±0.14eτ+t
10.36±0.13µτ+t
21.75±0.57µµ+t
00.31±0.13eµ+t
00.21±0.12ee+t
OBSERVEDSM expectedSelection
M(eτ) (GeV/c2)
PRL 95,151805 (2005)
6 analyses:-2l(l=e,µ,τ)+isolated track or µ±µ±
− ET and topological cuts (Mll,Δφ, MT)
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
44 Chargino Neutralino Chargino Neutralino LimitsLimitsmSUGRA: M(χ±)≈M(χ0
2) ≈2M(χ01)
“3l-max”• M( l ) > M(χ0
2)• No slepton mixing
Limits : σxBR < 0.2 pb M(χ±
1)>116 GeV/c2
“Heavy Squarks”• M(χ±)≈M(χ0
2)≠3M(q)σxBR < 0.2 pbM(χ±
1)>128 GeV/c2
“Large m0”• M(l)>>M(χ02 ,χ±)
No sensitivity
~~
Analyses being updated with 1 fb-1
A0=0
~~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~~
~mSugra
optimisticscenario
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
45 Chargino Neutralino Chargino Neutralino LimitsLimitsmSUGRA: M(χ±)≈M(χ0
2) ≈2M(χ01)
“3l-max”• M( l ) > M(χ0
2)• No slepton mixing
Limits : σxBR < 0.2 pb M(χ±
1)>116 GeV/c2
“Heavy Squarks”• M(χ±)≈M(χ0
2)≠3M(q)σxBR < 0.2 pbM(χ±
1)>128 GeV/c2
“Large m0”• M(l)>>M(χ02 ,χ±)
No sensitivity
~~ A0=0
~~ ~
~
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~~
~mSugra
optimisticscenario
M(slep)>>M(neutralino)=> 2Bodies decay
region
3rd lepton too softOnly LS
analysessensitive
Neutralino decay invisible to neutrinos
3 Bodiesdecay region
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
46 Summary and Outlook:Summary and Outlook:Chargino Chargino and and Neutralino Neutralino in in mSugramSugra
TRILEPTONS SIGNAL:• CDF and D0 analysed first half of data and observed no excess :(• Set limit already beyond LEP results ! (although model dependent )• 1.5 fb-1 of data collected and ready to be analysed• With 4-8 fb-1 by the end of RunII we should be sensitive to Charginomasses up to ~250 GeV and σxBR ~ 0.05-0.01 pb !!
Ellis, Heinemeyer, Olive, Weiglein,
hep-ph\0411216
Favouredby EW
precisiondata
nownow
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
47 Susy Susy at the LHC !at the LHC !• Will generally be found
fast!• But SUSY comes in very
many flavours• Hints from the Tevatron
would help on searchpriorities, e.g. tanβ large:
3rd generationimportant(τ’s, b’s)
R-parity is violated No ET
GMSB models: Photons important
Split-SUSY: Stable charged
hadrons
Can setup triggersaccordingly
up to 2 TeV
up to 2.3 TeV
up to 2.8 TeV
Inclusive searchSTATISTICAL
reach only
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
48 Susy Susy at the LHC !at the LHC !• Will generally be found
fast!• But SUSY comes in very
many flavours• Hints from the Tevatron
would help on searchpriorities, e.g. tanβ large:
3rd generationimportant(τ’s, b’s)
R-parity is violated No ET
GMSB models: Photons important
Split-SUSY: Stable charged
hadrons
Can setup triggersaccordingly
up to 2 TeV
up to 2.3 TeV
up to 2.8 TeV
Inclusive searchSTATISTICAL
reach only
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
49 Production Cross-sections at the LHCProduction Cross-sections at the LHC
• In mSugra: squark-gluino
dominate (jets+metchannel)
• Direct productioncross-sections small But could be the only
way to observe SUSY ifquark-gluinos areheavy ! (“focus point”)
• In other regionstrileptons signalenhanced from squark-gluino cascade
χ02 χ±1
∼ ∼
T. Plehn, PROSPINO
σ(pb)
mass(GeV/c2)
3,000eventsin 3fb-1
300keventsin 3fb-1
SUSY σ(pb) vs sparticlemass(GeV/c2) for √ s=14 TeV
But also : 6x106 Zs, 2.4x106 t-antitop and
150,000 WZ !
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
50
Depends on:Observable:
Mass measurement at the LHCMass measurement at the LHC• Mass constraints• Invariant masses in
pairs Missing energy Kinematic edges
Limits depend on angles betweensparticle decays
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
51 Building on leptonsBuilding on leptons……
• Other possibilities with leptonsignatures in mSugra:Jets+MET+leptons -> mass of the
sparticles in the cascadeLike-sign dileptons -> still sensitive to
chargino-neutralino but also on gluino pairproduction ! (no jet veto)
R-parity violating scenarios
8th May 2006 Giulia Manca, University of Liverpool
52 ConclusionsConclusions
• Chargino-neutralino are the goldendiscovery model at the Tevatron !
• Hints from the Tevatron can givedirections to the LHC
• At the LHC, chargino-neutralinoproduction crucial in study the propertiesof the new sparticles as their masses (butonly mSugra considered)
•• Exciting times to comeExciting times to come !!