scottish stroke audit
DESCRIPTION
Scottish Stroke Audit. 3rd National Meeting 7th Dec 04. Welcome. NHS QIS funded audit - Oct 02 - 05 Original plan - 6 to 10 hospitals Impact of CHD & Stroke strategy NHS QIS standards and visits. Program. Comparisons between hospitals Control charts - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Scottish Stroke Audit
3rd National Meeting7th Dec 04
Welcome
• NHS QIS funded audit - Oct 02 - 05• Original plan - 6 to 10 hospitals• Impact of CHD & Stroke strategy• NHS QIS standards and visits
Program
• Comparisons between hospitals • Control charts • Demonstration of real time data capture
system• Audit of swallow screening• Update on “MCNs on the Web”
How can these data help improve patient care?
• Identify variation in “performance” and to raise questions about cause of variation
• Identify methods which increase performance?
• Highlight services requiring more investment or re design
Reasons for variation in “Performance”
• Method of collection data• Definitions, case ascertainment and audit period
• Method of analysing data• Which numerator and denominator? • Chance• Actual performance of service
Some statistical terms
• Proportions (%)• 95% confidence intervals • Means and medians• Inter quartile range
Proportions
• Numerator / Denominator = Proportion• 100 patients admitted• 60 enter stroke unit• Proportion is 60/100 = 0.6 or 60%• We have had problems with denominators• NHS QIS ask % admitted SU within 1 day• Is denominator 60 or 100?
Denominators
• If admit 100 stroke patients• 60 enter the stroke unit• therefore 60% managed in a stroke unit• if half get into stroke unit within a day• % admitted to SU <1day = 50% or 30%• NHS QIS want 30% figure
95% confidence intervals• Measure the proportion entering your stroke
unit once• Calculate the 95% Confidence intervals• Measure the proportion a further 100 times
and one would expect 95 estimates to lie within the 95% confidence intervals.
Effect of sample size
No. instroke unit
No. ofstrokes
admitted
% instroke unit
95%confidenceintervals
12 20 60 36 - 81%
60 100 60 50 - 70%
300 500 60 56 - 64%
A normal distribution
02468
101214161820
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Mean = 10Median = 10
Length of stay in Days
No. ofpatients
Length of stay
Mean = 10Median = 10
02468
101214161820
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Length of stay (days)
No of people.
Mean = total no. of days / total no. of peopleMedian = LOS where half the people have longer ones and half shorter ones
A skewed distributione.g. length of stay in acute stroke unit
02468
101214161820
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Mean = 7.3Median = 6
Days
No.
A very skewed distributione.g. delay to CT scan
02468
101214161820
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Mean = 4.9Median = 3
Days
No.
Quartiles (quarters)
02468
101214161820
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Mean = 10Median = 10
Days
No.
Interquartile range (IQR)(half the patients are included)
Comparisons between hospitals
A few hospitals which are currently collecting data are not included
because too few data are available.
Inpatients
Data collection periods vary
• Longer period will provide more patients and more precise estimates
• Longer period will include older data• Recent short period will not include patients
still in hospital - therefore may give biased estimates
Variable data collection times
RIE, Edinburgh 12 monthsWGH, Edinburgh 12 monthsNinewells 6 monthsAberdeen (ARI) 12 monthsAyr 3 monthsCrosshouse 3 monthsPaisley (RAH) 21 monthsInverclyde (IRH) 15 months
No. of admissions available for analysis – Group 1
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
RIE WGH Ninewells ARI
All ptsStroke pts
Ninewells estimates will have wide Confidence intervalsso differences are more likely to be due to chance
No. of admissions per year Group 1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
RIE WGH Ninewells ARI
Stroke pts
At Ninewells may be missing cases - not identified orsimply not yet discharged
0100200300400500600700800
Ayr
Crossh
ouse
Inver
clyde
RAHDGRI
All ptsStroke pts
No. of admissions available for analysis – Group 2
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Ayr Crosshouse Inverclyde RAH DGRI
Stroke
No. of admissions per year – Group 2
No. of admissions per year – Group 3
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Hairmyres Monklands Wishaw Falkirk Stirling
Stroke
No. of admissions per year -Group 4
0100200300400500600700800
Borders
St Joh
nsPert
h
Raigmor
eVH
QMH
Stroke pts
The estimate in your hand out for St Johns is incorrect
No. of admissions per year – Group 5
0102030405060708090
100
Oban VOL Shetland Western Isles
Stroke
Length of Stay in HospitalMean Median
Group 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
RIE WGH Ninewells ARIPatients with longer LOS in Ninewells not yet dischargedWhy is LOS shorter in ARI than Edinburgh??
Length of Stay in HospitalMean Median
Group 2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Ayr Crosshouse Inverclyde RAH DGRI
Length of Stay in HospitalMean Median
Group 2
Length of Stay in HospitalMean Median
Group 3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Hairmyres Monklands Wishaw Falkirk Stirling
Length of Stay in HospitalMean Median
Group 3
Two fold difference Monklands & Falkirk - why?
Length of Stay in HospitalMean Median
Group 4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
BGH St Johns Perth Raigmore VHK QMH
Length of Stay in HospitalMean Median
Group 4
Length of Stay in HospitalMean Median
Group 5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Oban VOL Shetland Western Isles
Length of Stay in HospitalMean Median
Group 5
Imprecise estimates because small numbers
Shetland a different model of service?
Proportions admitted to Stroke Unit – Group 1
0102030405060708090
100
RIE WGH Ninewells ARI
Note the 95% CI vary with amount of data collected
77 beds 42 beds
18 beds
Proportions admitted to Stroke Unit – Group 2
0102030405060708090
100
Ayr Crosshouse Inverclyde RAH DGRI
Ayr & Crosshouse are doing well! - ? chance because only 3 month7.6-8.3 pts/SU bed/yr cf 14 pts/SU bed/yr in Inverclyde
35 beds 43 beds
16 beds30 beds
10 beds
Proportions admitted to Stroke Unit – Group 3
0102030405060708090
100
Hairmyres Monklands Wishaw Falkirk Stirling
24 beds24 bed
25 beds 30 beds
15 male
Proportions admitted to Stroke Unit – Group 4
0102030405060708090
100
Borders St Johns Perth Raigmore VH QMH
17 beds
15 beds
8 beds
0 beds
21 beds
14 beds
Proportions admitted to Stroke Unit – Group 5
0102030405060708090
100
Oban VOL Shetland Western Isles
6 bedsVariable
Mean Delay in accessing SU – Group 1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
RIE WGH Ninewells ARI
Mean Delay in accessing SU – Group 2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Ayr Crosshouse Inverclyde RAH DGRI
Mean Delay in accessing SU – Group 3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Hairmyres Monklands Wishaw Falkirk Stirling
Mean Delay in accessing SU – Group 4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Borders St Johns Perth Raigmore VH QMH
X
Mean Delay in accessing SU – Group 5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Oban VOL Shetland Western Isles
X
Proportion of admission in Stroke Unit – Group 1
0102030405060708090
100
RIE WGH Ninewells ARI
X
Reflects delay in admission% entering SU and exit from SU before discharge
Proportion of admission in Stroke Unit – Group 2
0102030405060708090
100
Ayr Crosshouse Inverclyde RAH DGRI
Proportion of admission in Stroke Unit – Group 3
0102030405060708090
100
Hairmyres Monklands Wishaw Falkirk Stirling
Proportion of admission in Stroke Unit – Group 4
0102030405060708090
100
Borders St Johns Perth Raigmore VH QMH
X
Proportions of admission in Stroke Unit – Group 5
0102030405060708090
100
Oban VOL Shetland Western Isles
X X
Proportions scanned – Group 1
0102030405060708090
100
RIE WGH Ninewells ARI
Scanned<=2days<=7days
ARI seem to be having problems getting scans
Proportions scanned – Group 2
0102030405060708090
100
Scanned<=2days<=7 days
Delays in Ayr and Crosshouse
Proportions scanned – Group 3
0102030405060708090
100
Scanned<=2 days<=7 days
Proportions scanned – Group 4
0102030405060708090
100
Scanned<=2 days<=7 days
Raigmore and Victoria Hospital Kirkaldy having problems
Proportions scanned – Group 5
0102030405060708090
100
Oban VOL Shetland WesternIsles
Scanned<= 2 days<= 7days
Shetland understandably not scanning all patientsWestern Isles have excellent access to CT
Proportion of ischaemic stroke given aspirin within 2 days
Group 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
RIE WGH Ninewells ARI
Aspirin
Does ARI perform well because they don’t bother to wait for CT?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Ayr Crosshouse Inverclyde RAH DGRI
Proportion of ischaemic stroke given aspirin within 2 days–
Group 2
May be bad luck because of small numbers but odd given excellentaccess to SU & CT - are they giving an alternative antiplatelet drug?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Hairmyres Monklands Wishaw Falkirk Stirling
Proportion of ischaemic stroke given aspirin within 2 days–
Group 3
Proportion of ischaemic stroke given aspirin within 2 days–
Group 4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Borders St Johns Perth Raigmore VH QMH
Proportion of ischaemic stroke given aspirin within 2 days–
Group 5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Oban VOL Shetland Western Isles
Proportion of ischaemic stroke discharged on secondary prevention
Group 1
0102030405060708090
100
RIE WGH Ninewells ARI
AntithromboticStatinBP
X
Ninewells get most patients on triple therapy
0102030405060708090
100
AntithromboticStatinBP
Proportion of ischaemic stroke discharged on secondary
prevention - Group 2
Proportion of ischaemic stroke discharged on secondary
prevention - Group 3
0102030405060708090
100
AntithromboticStatinBP
Proportion of ischaemic stroke discharged on secondary
prevention - Group 4
0102030405060708090
100
Borders
St Joh
nsPert
h
Raigmor
eVH
QMH
AntithromboticStatinBP
VHK and QMH stand out
Proportion of ischaemic stroke discharged on secondary
prevention - Group 5
0102030405060708090
100
Oban VOL Shetland Western Isles
Statins not used in Western Isles
Proportions of pts with ischaemic stroke and AF discharged on
Warfarin – Group 1
0102030405060708090
100
RIE WGH Ninewells ARI
WarfarinAntiplatelet
X
Very varied use of warfarin in AF
0102030405060708090
100
Ayr Crosshouse Inverclyde RAH DGRI
Proportion of ischaemic stroke in AF given Aspirin or
Warfarin– Group 2WarfarinAntiplatelet
Where columns add up to >100 then combination used?
Proportion of ischaemic stroke in AF given Aspirin or
Warfarin– Group 3
0102030405060708090
100
Hairmyres Monklands Wishaw Falkirk Stirling
WarfarinAntiplatelet
? ?Something odd about data from Lanarkshire
Proportion of ischaemic stroke in AF given Aspirin or
Warfarin– Group 4
0102030405060708090
100
Borders St Johns Perth Raigmore VH QMH
WarfarinAntiplatelet
Proportion of ischaemic stroke in AF given Aspirin or
Warfarin– Group 5
0102030405060708090
100
Oban VOL Shetland Western Isles
WarfarinAntiplatelet
Proportion of ischaemic stroke in AF given Aspirin or
Warfarin– Group 5
1 patient !
Discussion
Neurovascular clinics
No. of Neurovascular Clinic patients available for analysis
0100200300400500600700800900
1000
RIEW
GH
Ninewell
sAyr
Crossh
ouse
Inver
clyde
RAHDGRI
St Joh
nsVHK
QMH
Straca
throOban
Diagnoses in Neurovascular clinic
010203040506070
RIEW
GH
Ninewell
sAyr
Crossh
ouse
Inver
clyde
RAH
StrokeTIAEyeOther
Diagnoses in Neurovascular clinic
010203040506070
DGRI
St Joh
nsVHK
QMH
Straca
throOban
StrokeTIAEyeOther
Median delay from referral to assessment (days)
01020304050607080
RIEW
GH
Ninewell
sAyr
Crossh
ouse
Inver
clyde
RAHDGRI
St Joh
nsVHK
QMH
Straca
throOban
% seen within 14 days of referral
0102030405060708090
100
RIEW
GH
Ninewell
sAyr
Crossh
ouse
Inver
clyde
RAHDGRI
St Joh
nsVHK
QMH
Straca
throOban
Delays from Assessment to Duplex (days)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
RIEW
GH
Ninewell
sAyr
Crossh
ouse
Inver
clyde
RAHDGRI
St Joh
nsVHK
QMH
Straca
throOban
MeanMedian
St Johns reported 3 year data - now sortedNinewells & RIE get Duplex before clinic and only few patients
Delays from Assessment to Brain scan for stroke (days)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
RIEW
GH
Ninewell
sAyr
Crossh
ouse
Inver
clyde
RAHDGRI
St Joh
nsVHK
QMH
Straca
throOban
MeanMedian
In some places scans are obtained before clinic
Delays from Assessment to Echo for stroke/TIA (days)
01020304050607080
RIEW
GH
Ninewell
sAyr
Crossh
ouse
Inver
clyde
RAHDGRI
St Joh
nsVHK
QMH
Straca
throOban
MeanMedian
XX X
Treatment of Definite Ischaemic events with aspirin
0102030405060708090
100
RIEW
GH
Ninewell
sAyr
Crossh
ouse
Inver
clyde
RAHDGRI
St Joh
nsVHK
QMHOban
At eventAssessmentRecommended
% of Definite Ischaemic events treated with Clopidogrel
0
5
10
15
20
25
Treatment of Definite Ischaemic events with aspirin & dipyridamole
01020304050607080
Mean delays from Last event to surgery (days)
1
10
100
WGH RAH DGRI
Conclusions
• We have seen considerable variation in the processes of care
• We need to understand these to strive to provide the best possible service for all
• No hospital can be complacent - there is room for improvement everywhere
Mean delays from Assessment to Duplex (days)
0.1
1
10
100
Mean
Treatment of Definite Ischaemic events with dipyridamole
01020304050607080
At eventAssessmentRecommended
Treatment of Neurovascular clinic patients with definite ischaemic
events with BP lowering
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
RIEW
GH
Ninewell
sAyr
Crossh
ouse
Inver
clyde
RAHDGRI
St Joh
nsVHK
QMHOban
At eventAssessmentRecommended